Military Review

The occupation of the Baltic continues

62



The next division of the US armed forces, equipped with Stryker armored personnel carriers, arrived in Lithuania on January 11. Approximately 130 military personnel from the 2 Cavalry Regiment of the 3 Division of the US Army, based in Vilseck (Germany), were deployed to the Lithuanian city of Karmelava. It is not the first time that our neighbors are hosting “guests from NATO” - this is the ninth dispatch of American troops to Lithuania.

By the end of the week, the total number of US military personnel arriving to conduct joint exercises will reach a total of 170 people.

It is known that the Baltic States had previously been one of the most peaceful and military-stable regions. However, the situation changed dramatically when US interest in this region increased.

In the past two years alone, the military presence of NATO and the United States in the Baltic countries has rapidly increased. In total, the contingent of the Alliance, deployed in the countries of the region, has over a thousand military personnel, hundreds of heavy equipment and about a dozen aircraft.

It should be noted that the commander of US ground forces in Europe, Lieutenant General Ben Hodges at the final press conference 2015 of the year confirmed plans to build warehouses of heavy military equipment in the Baltic States and Eastern Europe by the end of 2016. The United States plans to deploy military equipment in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Romania and Bulgaria, and by the year 2017 in Hungary.

By the way, the implementation of these plans will be nothing but a direct violation of the NATO-Russia Founding Act of 1997 of the year, which states: “In the present and foreseeable conditions, the alliance will carry out its collective defense and other tasks through ensuring the necessary compatibility, integration and reinforcement potential, rather than through the additional permanent deployment of significant combat forces. ”

In addition, an increase in military presence in the Baltic States not only undermines stability on the continent, but also violates fundamental international treaties (in particular, the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe). It is noteworthy that the US Air Force instructors are drawing on strategic exercises to develop training tasks for the use of nuclear bombs of Polish and Baltic pilots, thereby violating the 1 article of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty weaponswhich reads: “Each of the States parties to this Treaty possessing nuclear weapons undertakes ... and not to transfer to anyone any nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, as well as control over such weapons or explosive devices, directly or indirectly” .

At the same time, the statements of some Lithuanian authorities about the need to deploy NATO ground bases in Eastern Europe personify a policy to destroy international law.

It's no secret that being an ally of the United States is a deal with the devil, which takes into account only his own interests. Baltic provocative policymakers should understand that by steadily increasing the military presence of NATO countries on the territory of their states, they are fueling an open conflict between NATO and Russia. Evidence of this can serve the intentions of Poland and the Baltic countries to petition at the upcoming NATO summit in Warsaw to open Allied military bases on their territory in violation of the Russia-NATO agreement.

Eloquent statements by the head of the Polish Foreign Ministry, Witold Vashchikovsky, "We want NATO parts to be based in Poland." The press officer of the commander of the Lithuanian armed forces Mindaugas Neymontas also supported the policy of Poland to deploy NATO forces on its territory on a permanent basis: “This is necessary for security. There will be no improvement in our region, so it will be a deterrent. ” In accordance with the statement of Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves, the deployment of NATO military bases on the territory of this state is "necessary for protection from neighboring Russia."

Not surprisingly, the result of such a policy of confrontation and the escalation of tension in the region was Russia's consideration of the Baltic states as a military adversary and the object of a first military strike in the event of armed confrontation with the Alliance. It is obvious that in the event of an open armed conflict between Russia and NATO, the Baltic States will become a proving ground for hostilities. In this case, the countries of this region will not care who wins - the victory of either side will mean chaos and destruction for the Baltic States.

Multilateral cooperation with the neighboring countries, the demilitarization of the territory of the Baltic states and the maintenance of peace - this is the vector of policy that would provide guaranteed security for the countries and ordinary people of the Baltic region. However, the politicians of the Baltic states stubbornly refuse to understand this and, by their actions together with their NATO allies, demonstrate to the whole world: “When they say guns, the laws are silent.”
Author:
Originator:
http://www.belvpo.com/ru/63313.html
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sasha 19871987
    Sasha 19871987 15 January 2016 12: 18 New
    +6
    The occupation of the Baltic continues
    the Balts are only happy, their slavish thinking ... and they have the most terrible form of slavery, for they think that they are free ...
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 15 January 2016 12: 28 New
      16
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      the balts are only happy

      Slaves, they are slaves everywhere, even in the Baltic states, even in Poland, even in Ukraine. In the Baltic states the same picture. repeat
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 15 January 2016 12: 29 New
      +6
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      the balts are only happy

      They are six, these current descendants of Gediminas and Vytautas. The Great Baltic Dream - to be the main swineherd at the manor of the German baron. Well, or, as in current realities, the senior groom on the ranch of the American rich.
      1. Dam
        Dam 15 January 2016 14: 08 New
        +9
        And they are not descendants. You confuse the Litvinians (present Belarusians) with the people of Zhmud, whose Lithuanians are the heirs
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 15 January 2016 15: 25 New
          +4
          Quote: Damm
          And they are not descendants. You confuse the Litvinians (present Belarusians) with the people of Zhmud, whose Lithuanians are the heirs

          This is not me confusing. It is they who consider themselves as such, namely the descendants of the Great Lithuanian Princes. The emblem of present-day Lithuania is the emblem of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. And it doesn’t bother anyone.
          1. Dam
            Dam 15 January 2016 21: 45 New
            +1
            Plagiarism is generally characteristic of peoples who do not have a more or less intelligible history of their own. Look at Galitsaev, all the ancestors of the Cossacks found where the brain of Karl is?
    3. Al_oriso
      Al_oriso 15 January 2016 12: 39 New
      0
      It is obvious that in the event of an open armed conflict between Russia and NATO, the Baltic states will turn into a combat training ground. In this case, the countries of this region will not care who will prevail - the victory of either side will mean chaos and destruction for the Baltic states.

      Apparently, the real real existence of the Baltic is so bleak that its rulers are ready to sacrifice their countries and peoples in the hope of something better (ironic).
    4. bocsman
      bocsman 15 January 2016 12: 56 New
      +3
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      the Balts are only happy, their slavish thinking ... and they have the most terrible form of slavery, for they think that they are free ...

      They don’t think anything. Over the past few years, words about freedom and independence have practically disappeared from their press. So they understand that they do not have independence, and it wasn’t. But they also understand that over the past twenty years, being under the protectorate of the West, they have done so much nasty things and the only way they can go is to prison or to the block. So they are trying to extend their miserable existence. But because of the poverty of the mind, they again do everything to accelerate their decline.
    5. Maxom75
      Maxom75 16 January 2016 01: 49 New
      0
      but in my opinion everything is much simpler there, at least the elite is more likely to be ruled by a passion for money, authorities and a banal fear that their dealings will emerge. The people were stupidly intimidated and duped by threats of destruction by the eastern hordes. The ignorance of the people and the fear instilled by the authorities are the guarantee of the liars' long power.
  2. cheap trick
    cheap trick 15 January 2016 12: 25 New
    +6
    some are only glad that they are sitting in the Sejm! and those who get the job, the rest are not very happy! I tell you as a resident of Vilnius in the past! in the absence of work, people are happy to get at least something. And whatever they met with flowers, I can surprise you, under the American embassy constantly Yankee rallies go home!
    ps and these are not Russian residents, mostly Lithuanians!
  3. SAM 5
    SAM 5 15 January 2016 12: 29 New
    +2
    Ben Hodges at the final press conference of 2015 confirmed plans to create heavy military equipment warehouses in the Baltic countries and eastern Europe by the end of 2016

    Chukhna wants to become target number 1.
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 15 January 2016 12: 40 New
      +8
      Quote: SAM 5
      Chukhna wants to become target number 1.

      In principle, they have long been the No. 1 target
      Russia began to consider the Baltic states as a military adversary and the object of the first military strike in the event of an armed confrontation with the Alliance. It is obvious that in the event of an open armed conflict between Russia and NATO, the Baltic states will turn into a combat training ground. In this case, the countries of this region will not care who will prevail - the victory of either side will mean chaos and destruction for the Baltic states.
  4. iouris
    iouris 15 January 2016 12: 30 New
    0
    US military units in the FSU and BVS countries are needed for propaganda, so the word "occupation" is not appropriate.
    The introduction of troops is not necessary, it is enough to place the right people in several key positions, control financial institutions and indirectly influence the ideological views of certain groups of the population, for example, through history.
    1. gergi
      gergi 15 January 2016 12: 34 New
      +1
      This is occupation.
      1. Schulz
        Schulz 15 January 2016 14: 15 New
        0
        Quote: gergi
        This is occupation.

        You don't even know the meaning of the word "occupation".
  5. gergi
    gergi 15 January 2016 12: 30 New
    +3
    Yes, they have nothing to rejoice at; they were really scared. Living in fear is not ice! A clear illustration of the truth - you do not want to feed your army, you will please someone else's. Crushed and raped uebaltia. Cities are empty, the gene pool is scattering. They think that they were planned to be minced first.
  6. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 15 January 2016 12: 40 New
    +1
    The owners have arrived while they are just looking closely, but over time they will become jealous of slaves and estates, the names in local languages ​​will disappear, you will only speak English and shortly "yes sir, sir", and when you begin to remember that they were once states, and even earlier -could laugh and celebrate the holidays when they wanted and not with the permission of the master.
  7. FIREMAN
    FIREMAN 15 January 2016 12: 41 New
    +2
    To paraphrase the famous phrase of the Macedonian king Philip II: "A Hammer laden with gold will take any fortress, especially if there are donkeys in it." Nothing has changed since the time of the conquistadors and Columbus - beads, glass, and this ends, as history has shown, usually with reservations. Wait and see.
  8. Dimontius
    Dimontius 15 January 2016 12: 42 New
    +2
    Well, how do you like? we return the status of a great power! The stump is clear that pressure is on all fronts, from the oil-budget to the military-political and sports-tolerant. I give hand to the cutoff that the whole headquarters - 100 people are sitting and thinking how to squeeze us on all fronts. And this is natural, otherwise each country could declare its exclusivity (not in the American sense). It’s just that the whole world needs to prove its status in practice (not to be confused with status 6 laughing ). As the saying goes, "then we will live," because money loves peace and stability, and having withstood all this pressure, it’s worse than ever to imagine (well, except for a hot conflict) the world will run to us with its investments at a tremendous speed. Because all around the world there is "overconsumption", and we have a great future with our resources. I just want to be an optimist at a time like this. repeat
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 15 January 2016 13: 27 New
      +2
      Quote: Dimontius
      Well, how do you like? we return the status of a great power!

      That's right, the people, apparently, have already forgotten how our "rulers" looked into the mouths of the Yankes advisers and fed the people with their legs and fairy tales, to the drunken dances of Yeltsin .... It's good that they were smart enough to get out of this, although with the consequences of only one privatization for a long time to struggle.
      1. iouris
        iouris 15 January 2016 13: 31 New
        0
        Have you already jumped off? I have not read the official statements.
        1. dvina71
          dvina71 15 January 2016 17: 02 New
          0
          Quote: iouris
          Have you already jumped off? I have not read the official statements.


          And I always thought that this manifests itself in the logic of events .. Was wrong .. yes?
          1. iouris
            iouris 16 January 2016 00: 14 New
            0
            The result is important, but its tendency or, as official propaganda denotes it. In addition, if it seems to you that everything is clear in politics, then the goal of propaganda has been achieved. It will be clear only in 30-50 years (if we have them).
  9. Vadim Zhivov
    Vadim Zhivov 15 January 2016 12: 45 New
    +1
    Didn’t want to be a showcase, be a jerk .... Forcibly glad you won’t .... HANG wassat
  10. lysyj bob
    lysyj bob 15 January 2016 12: 45 New
    +4
    They gave independence to a people who do not know anything about it. These people used it according to the old genetic memory - they stupidly changed their owner. Now they bark at the old owner. And so it will always be like them. There are peoples who do not need independence and statehood, they you need a master, and the more he tears them, the more they shout with delight about independence. Artificially created states on the territory of residence of such peoples are not viable, with rare exceptions. Mongols, in a word.
  11. Naum
    Naum 15 January 2016 12: 47 New
    +5
    Russophobia is a terrible disease! Even deadly: "to spite" Russia I will take and end up ... "All these" sprotlands "have never had a full-fledged statehood, at least for a considerable time. So, semi-colonies under someone's protectorate. At best. Hence the inferiority complexes, who are trying to “overcome” by creating the image of an “enemy.” “Ah, Pug! ..!
  12. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 15 January 2016 12: 47 New
    +2
    It is known that the Baltic States had previously been one of the most peaceful and military-stable regions. However, the situation changed dramatically when US interest in this region increased.

    Against the background of Russophobia and the lack of military potential, the Baltic states rushed into NATO, not realizing that neither Russia nor NATO needed them.
    NATO needed another training ground in Europe, they got it, and some Baltic states, like people, are garbage for them.
  13. viktor561
    viktor561 15 January 2016 12: 48 New
    0
    And what are the Balts? - so a fragment of the Scythians? - Yes, no wimps - even compared to Finland - the former part of the Russian Empire - they are simply zero - a cowardly and unsuitable people
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 15 January 2016 17: 04 New
      +2
      Quote: viktor561
      cowardly and unsuitable people

      Here you are in vain .. The scientist is stubborn and rather brave. And certainly not cowards.
    2. iouris
      iouris 16 January 2016 00: 23 New
      0
      There is no such nation - "Balts". And there is no such country. Learn geography. "Scythians and Asians" - this is about Russians, written by the poet Blok.
      Estonians and Finns are Finno-Ugric peoples. Latvian and Lithuanian languages ​​belong to the Indo-European language group.
      The people do not stand in power anywhere. Power is seized by very narrow, united groups of policy makers in the United States. Russophobia of these individuals is a manifestation of phobias about the threat of their leading role in conducting, in fact, anti-people’s politics and at the same time the political order of the owners.
  14. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 15 January 2016 12: 50 New
    +1
    The Great Baltic, we must pay tribute to them, is notable for its unhurried leisurely constancy - all this audience sits vozle parashi for 300-400 years and does not twitch, only now the exacerbation has begun recently, but psychiatrists will figure it out ...
  15. bytkeev
    bytkeev 15 January 2016 12: 51 New
    0
    Yes ... the times have passed when the Baltic states (the Grand Duchy of Lithuania) pursued an independent policy ... now they will dictate their will
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 15 January 2016 13: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: bytkeev
      Yes ... the times have passed when the Baltic states (the Grand Duchy of Lithuania) pursued an independent policy ... now they will dictate their will

      They were not great on their own, there was a Polish-Lithuanian principality or the speech of the Commonwealth, they made conquests, there was a Russian-Lithuanian state, and they themselves rushed to where they would not kill ...
      1. FIREMAN
        FIREMAN 15 January 2016 13: 15 New
        +6
        Wait, there was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (ON), everything was fine until the gentry, who had gathered at Vitebsk in 1562 for a field Diet, demanded that the King and Grand Duke Sigismund II August “establish a joint diet with the Poles so that they could elect the king together "have common protection, jointly seismic and the right to use the same thing." On the other hand, the larger Polish gentry sought to annex the Principality as an appendage to Poland in order to obtain new lands and posts for themselves. There was even a proposal to replace the name “Lithuania” with the name “New Poland” (http://www.gistoryja.ru/vtoraya-polovina-XVI-konec-XVIII-v/7-prichiny-obrazovan

        ija-rechi-pospolitoj.php).
        In addition, the main reason for the Union of Lublin was the difficult foreign policy situation of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Livonian War. Poles agreed to provide military assistance only subject to the signing of the state union. Poles benefited from the inclusion of land on. In addition, the Catholic Church of Poland had a certain interest in expanding spheres of influence.
        The reason for the crisis of the Commonwealth is the right to “liberum veto” which allowed even one deputy of the Sejm to veto the royal law. Thus, the king could not decide anything. Here is a typical example of Eurapian liberalization.
        Summarizing, the Commonwealth itself drove itself into crisis, primarily due to greed and the fact that there was no unity of government, enrichment of the nobility was paramount.
    2. lysyj bob
      lysyj bob 15 January 2016 13: 03 New
      +2
      Previously they were called "Zhmudins" and their country was Zhmud. They have nothing in common with those Lithuanians, or rather the Lithuanians. A fragment of that principality, rather, Belarusians and Poles.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  16. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 15 January 2016 12: 55 New
    -3
    miserable hyena balts
    1. cheap trick
      cheap trick 15 January 2016 14: 18 New
      +1
      probably every 5 minutes you open to look how much + you thought to get for your bastard))))
      1. The comment was deleted.
  17. cheap trick
    cheap trick 15 January 2016 13: 00 New
    +5
    and interestingly, about 99% have never been in it, for example in Lithuania! but to offend the whole nation so immediately a bunch of experts! and you come, and it’s strange to be surprised that there’s a special good attitude towards the Russians. Roll up on the palanga in the summer, everyone will speak Russian exactly! For 45 years of my life in Lithuania, I never heard anyone get out of Lithuania, etc. so Before insulting, think about whether you are doing it right, and whether it is culture! Thanks for your attention.
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 15 January 2016 13: 05 New
      +3
      But not arrested as a former occupier? Examples of veterans ... No, I don’t want to talk about the whole people, but if he suffers such power ... or very timid? Ukrainians are also so fearful ...
      1. cheap trick
        cheap trick 15 January 2016 14: 12 New
        +1
        No, I am a Lithuanian citizen, I have a passport, a residence permit, I speak the language, etc. I just moved to live in London, I work under a contract.
  18. Aitvaras
    Aitvaras 15 January 2016 13: 07 New
    -5
    Disagree with the Author. The agreement on non-deployment of bases signed between Russia and NATO is already outdated. Now the geopolitical situation is different. After all, today, for example, the agreements concluded between Napoleon and Alexander I. The agreement was concluded when the theory of Mr. Dugin "Russian World" was only a myth ... Well-known Russian politicians did not demand the return of the Russian borders at the beginning of 1917. G. Zhirinovsky, Vice Speaker of the State Duma of Russia, did not present territorial claims to Lithuania, i.e. the return of "Stalin's gifts" - Vilnius and Klaipeda. And we do not believe in Mr. Putin's peace-loving statements that "we do not need a foreign land". At the beginning of 2014, on Russian TV, Putin deliberately spoke a lie, stating that "the annexation of Crimea is not considered," and later, in his comments about doc. the film about the annexation of Crimea to Russia, he told in detail how and when everything was prepared.
    We are in Lithuania in 1940. , we’ve got a good lesson. If there had been an Anglo-French expeditionary force in Lithuania then it would have been impossible for any annexation of the USSR.
    1. iouris
      iouris 15 January 2016 13: 29 New
      +4
      History teaches that it teaches nothing.
      As for the Anglo-French expeditionary force in Lithuania in 1940, excuse me, this is complete nonsense: only German occupation was shining in Lithuania. In 1940, France is a colony of the Reich and England is preparing for the invasion. Only the USSR could defeat Hitler.
      Today, Lithuania is a transit territory and an aerodrome zone.
      After 1945, Lithuania had statehood as part of the USSR. By the way, where is thanks for Comrade Stalin for Vilnius and Klaipeda and something else?
      1. Aitvaras
        Aitvaras 15 January 2016 13: 57 New
        -1
        I agree that these are my fantasies. As Mr. Putin said about "grandmother and grandfather ..." but there are some reasons to dream up. For example, an Anglo-French landing was planned to Finland in 1940 to help the Finns in the fight against the USSR, but they made peace earlier. If in 1938, in Britain, there would have been no "chamberlains" but "drawing", then perhaps there would have been no "shame of Munich." With all the consequences. And we "thanked" Comrade Stalin in 1939, everything was on On the basis of the friendship treaty concluded on July 12, 1920, Soviet Russia recognized Vilnius as the capital of Lithuania and after the USSR resolutely supported Lithuania in all its conflicts with Poland and Germany, including on the Klaipeda issue.
        1. iouris
          iouris 16 January 2016 00: 37 New
          0
          Everyone is now busy rewriting history and fantasies about it, because they think that the future can be rewritten. Here you are no exception. I understand that Lithuania is not the best place to study real history. However, since capital rules - there are probably no such places anywhere.
          I would very much like to see the French in 40-degree frost. By the way, only French pilots fought in the Normandie-Niemen squadron. And not just one mechanic. Is it clear why?
          The war with Finland, no matter how it ended, in 1940 could not be canceled on May 9, 1945 - not on that scale. For me, it would be better if Poland captured Berlin in 1936, and did not participate in the division of Czechoslovakia.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Moore
      Moore 15 January 2016 13: 35 New
      +4
      Quote: Aitvaras
      We are in Lithuania in 1940. , we’ve got a good lesson. If there had been an Anglo-French expeditionary force in Lithuania then it would have been impossible for any annexation of the USSR.


      You are just like the Georgians in 2008 - they also all expected that now the Americans would come and defeat everyone with Mishiko’s enemy. What hangover in the 40th was supposed to have some kind of corps there? You have been written off and will be written off more than once. Here is an excerpt from a speech by Sir Winston Churchill on October 1, 1939:

      The fact that the Russian armies were to stand on this line was absolutely necessary for Russia's security against the Nazi threat. Be that as it may, this line exists and the Eastern Front is created which Nazi Germany does not dare to attack. When Mr. Ribbentrop was called to Moscow last week, he had to find out and accept the fact that the implementation of Nazi plans in relation to the Baltic countries and Ukraine should be finally stopped ...

      Of course, they dared to attack, but they didn’t take off the start from the eastern borders of Estonia (there are doubts that the Germans would have entered the Baltic states if it weren’t for the USSR?), But from western Lithuania.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  19. uav80
    uav80 15 January 2016 13: 08 New
    0
    This is a usual rotation, earlier the Americans had already announced that they would withdraw the Abrams because they have poorly established themselves in the vast expanses of the Baltic states, and the Strikers will be driven in all of them ...
    1. iouris
      iouris 15 January 2016 13: 38 New
      +1
      We need such military equipment so that Dali's feed could get through the hatch. And "Abrams" or "Stryker" is not important.
      Does anyone think that this technique plays a role? Then explain why Turkey, the NATO member with the largest army, has not eliminated the Russian base in Syria?
  20. Gray 43
    Gray 43 15 January 2016 13: 14 New
    +3
    How many civilian objects did the invaders build? The Soviet "occupiers" invested with might and main in the development of the republics, and these do not want to build anything, apparently, that's why they are loved
  21. gamer
    gamer 15 January 2016 13: 16 New
    +2
    Quote: cheap trick
    and interestingly, about 99% have never been in it, for example in Lithuania! but to offend the whole nation so immediately a bunch of experts! and you come, and it’s strange to be surprised that there’s a special good attitude towards the Russians. Roll up on the palanga in the summer, everyone will speak Russian exactly! For 45 years of my life in Lithuania, I never heard anyone get out of Lithuania, etc. so Before insulting, think about whether you are doing it right, and whether it is culture! Thanks for your attention.

    I am in Lithuania very often, and I will say that there is plenty of arrogance among most Lithuanians! Either they pretend that they don’t understand Russian, or they do a huge favor Talking with you! But when you come to Russia, you’re ready to get into w ... pooh without soap !!!
  22. gamer
    gamer 15 January 2016 13: 21 New
    +6
    Quote: Aitvaras
    Disagree with the Author. The agreement on non-deployment of bases signed between Russia and NATO is already outdated. Now the geopolitical situation is different. After all, today, for example, the agreements concluded between Napoleon and Alexander I. The agreement was concluded when the theory of Mr. Dugin "Russian World" was only a myth ... Well-known Russian politicians did not demand the return of the Russian borders at the beginning of 1917. G. Zhirinovsky, Vice Speaker of the State Duma of Russia, did not present territorial claims to Lithuania, i.e. the return of "Stalin's gifts" - Vilnius and Klaipeda. And we do not believe in Mr. Putin's peace-loving statements that "we do not need a foreign land". At the beginning of 2014, on Russian TV, Putin deliberately spoke a lie, stating that "the annexation of Crimea is not considered," and later, in his comments about doc. the film about the annexation of Crimea to Russia, he told in detail how and when everything was prepared.
    We are in Lithuania in 1940. , we’ve got a good lesson. If there had been an Anglo-French expeditionary force in Lithuania then it would have been impossible for any annexation of the USSR.

    And this corps would run ahead of you to Russia, fleeing the Wehrmacht troops love
    1. _my opinion
      _my opinion 15 January 2016 19: 32 New
      0
      Quote: igorek
      Quote: Aitvaras
      Disagree with the Author. The agreement on non-deployment of bases signed between Russia and NATO is already outdated. Now the geopolitical situation is different. After all, today, for example, the agreements concluded between Napoleon and Alexander I. The agreement was concluded when the theory of Mr. Dugin "Russian World" was only a myth ... Well-known Russian politicians did not demand the return of the Russian borders at the beginning of 1917. G. Zhirinovsky, Vice Speaker of the State Duma of Russia, did not present territorial claims to Lithuania, i.e. the return of "Stalin's gifts" - Vilnius and Klaipeda. And we do not believe in Mr. Putin's peace-loving statements that "we do not need a foreign land". At the beginning of 2014, on Russian TV, Putin deliberately spoke a lie, stating that "the annexation of Crimea is not considered," and later, in his comments about doc. the film about the annexation of Crimea to Russia, he told in detail how and when everything was prepared.
      We are in Lithuania in 1940. , we’ve got a good lesson. If there had been an Anglo-French expeditionary force in Lithuania then it would have been impossible for any annexation of the USSR.

      And this corps would run ahead of you to Russia, fleeing the Wehrmacht troops love

      I agree with you, given the fact that after Hitler's invasion of Poland, France and England began to fight with Germany ... they only fought so to speak in a peculiar way: the former occasionally shot from the fortifications of the Maginot line, and the latter dumped tons on the Germans leaflets (and this was motivated by the desire to do no harm to the civilian population of Germany and its property) ... and the Poles were so glad that France and England came out to defend them ...
  23. viktor561
    viktor561 15 January 2016 13: 29 New
    +1
    Howls - sprats do not buy and tourists do not go - that's their whole economy - fu!
    1. iouris
      iouris 15 January 2016 13: 41 New
      +2
      Forget about sprats.
      Lithuania’s problem is that nobody needs Lithuania as a competitor. We need very cheap resources.
  24. Sausuolis
    Sausuolis 15 January 2016 14: 05 New
    -6
    In one, you are right — the military will have more and more — especially a unit of the Lithuanian military.
    1. FIREMAN
      FIREMAN 15 January 2016 14: 46 New
      +4
      Sausuolis LT December 18, 2015 13:24 | The first batch of Mistral 3 anti-aircraft missiles arrived in Estonia
      Conflict in only one of the Baltic countries is unlikely, so add 8000 Latvian volunteers and 5000 military personnel and 7000 Lithuanian shooters, 5000 volunteers and 12 military.
      It’s clear from the numbers that there can’t be any attack on their part, but in the case of defense, the enemy will easily break them.

      This is one of your previous comments.
      we will have more and more military - especially the unit of the Lithuanian military.

      I now have two questions:
      1. I just don’t understand why a 12 army + 000 riflemen = 7000 commanders - this is so accepted by NATO standards belay ?
      Volunteers You also try to collect FSA throughout Europe, where they carry out park and household works.
      2. There are more technicians, it’s good. What do you think there, nobody can see her movements and places of deployment? You are deeply mistaken. And where it is, but probably where it stood under the USSR.
      It’s just that sometimes you wonder about the invincible Baltic states. American shooter brought lol , probably written off with a SIGNIFICANTly developed resource of trunks (after Iraq or Afghanistan), so it’s cheaper not to drag back. You at least have specialists in its maintenance and the necessary tool to check this: well, there are drafts, impassable calibers, documentation in your native language, so that everything is clear, and you know the subtleties of the translation.
      When the equipment is given to you, at least the compression in the cylinders is measured, otherwise judging by the color of the equipment in the photo, the life of the engines has been greatly developed.
      1. Sausuolis
        Sausuolis 15 January 2016 15: 08 New
        -2
        about 5000 commanders, nikerta did not understand.
        If there are problems with the perception of the text, I explain:

        There are rotational military allies + there is a technology for storage left shtob back and forth not to drive. probably understand yes?
        The technique is American, they crawl it. In which case, I think they will not object if we will use it.
        Have additional questions formed?
        1. FIREMAN
          FIREMAN 15 January 2016 18: 54 New
          0
          5000 military personnel

          Based on the comment, I thought it was the staff of your ministry of defense. If so, then the sickly STAFF is there with you.
          I'll tell you this, all these fittings of Javelins, used Hummers, etc. - it's all good, the fact that the "Armata" below in the comments to burn gathered is also understandable. Okay, let's imagine that hostilities suddenly began, you are essentially the first line of defense, if I understand something in this matter. Well, what do you think countermeasures against you have not been worked out, most likely a preemptive strike on storage and storage sites with cruise missiles. At this time, you will start to panic among the civilian population - the roads are clogged, the equipment is partially destroyed and cannot leave the storage places. I would also send DRG to your rear beforehand (under the guise of tourists) I would destroy the communication lines as much as possible and turn on the electronic warfare devices at several points in order to cut out cellular and any other communications. First of all, you would run to save your family, and not to your home part. The weapon in the unit is in the gun, the cartridges are separate, the control is lost, until the "javelins" are transferred from the warehouses ... etc. the initiative has been intercepted by the other party. You will simply not be able to deploy a full-fledged defense even within a day or two. Thus, your task according to the plan of NATO is to heroically die, well, this is your choice. There is a lot of controversy, I'm not the General Staff, there are plans for you.
  25. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 15 January 2016 14: 37 New
    +4
    Quote: Sausuolis
    we will have more and more military - especially the unit of the Lithuanian military.

    And what are you happy about the "Lithuanian army", that with the arrival of the amers they became one hundred percent suicide bombers. When you did not have NATO troops, then there was at least not a big chance in the event of a conflict between Russia and NATO to at least somehow survive, now there is no such chance at all , I repeat once again, now you are all 100% suicide bombers, a bargaining chip, a consumable. So you can rejoice, a large army, a large rocket.
    1. Sausuolis
      Sausuolis 15 January 2016 15: 17 New
      -4
      And who hammered into your head INTO we are not going to defend our Motherland with some kind of ephemeral purpose of "surviving" ??
  26. Cobra77
    Cobra77 15 January 2016 15: 09 New
    +2
    Yes, yes, occupy me completely! laughing This is the Baltic states, what is there to expect - independence? It’s difficult to call them countries, so territorial units ....
    1. Sausuolis
      Sausuolis 15 January 2016 15: 24 New
      -3
      What are you witty.
  27. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 15 January 2016 15: 44 New
    +1
    Quote: Sausuolis
    And who hammered into your head INTO we are not going to defend our Motherland with some kind of ephemeral purpose of "surviving" ??

    And, what if it weren’t for the American troops, we don’t need anyway from you, you need to dirty your hands, it hurts a lot of honor, but now it’s ephemeral, not ephemeral, but there will be no chance to survive, and most importantly why? oh yes, you zeeuropa, horseradish you will understand, democratized by the very tonsils, alright, puff on, just don’t tear the panties.
  28. rus-5819
    rus-5819 15 January 2016 16: 50 New
    +3
    US interest in this region has increased.

    It would be necessary to send a dozen Iskander missiles additionally, Russia also has its own interests there.

    Looking at the map: Small bug, and it smelly !!!
    Painful dwarf loser complex.
  29. Sasha_Sar
    Sasha_Sar 15 January 2016 16: 54 New
    +5
    You look at the Baltics and you are amazed. We mean "occupiers" to them, with the whole union we built industry, nuclear energy, etc. for them. And Europe and the USA are "liberators" for them. And what did Europe and the United States do for the Baltics, what did they build? Do they think the States will feed them forever? Settled by "refugees" from Africa and the Middle East and "good-bye America Oh ..."
    1. Sausuolis
      Sausuolis 15 January 2016 17: 03 New
      -5
      The whole world, only Russia and a couple of great ones (Ossetia, North Korea, Transnistria ... who are you friends there) are very smart.
      Look in the mirror. The same Lithuania itself with all its oil lags behind in the economy. Rive your Armats, and we will burn them if you turn up.
      1. dvina71
        dvina71 15 January 2016 17: 20 New
        +3
        Quote: Sausuolis
        Look in the mirror. The same Lithuanians with all their oil lag behind in the economy


        Uh .. it turned out that state employees did not spend 1 trillion rubles that year .. well, they didn’t. Putin is not very happy ..
        At the current rate of 13.5 billion dead presidents. The budget of Lithuania in 15g 9.5 billion eureka .. still have questions about greatness?
      2. gamer
        gamer 16 January 2016 16: 28 New
        0
        Hey, clown! What is your economy ??? fool
  30. Cobra77
    Cobra77 15 January 2016 17: 57 New
    0
    Quote: Sausuolis
    The whole world, only Russia and a couple of great ones (Ossetia, North Korea, Transnistria ... who are you friends there) are very smart.
    Look in the mirror. The same Lithuania itself with all its oil lags behind in the economy. Rive your Armats, and we will burn them if you turn up.


    Ohhh Great Lithuanian Vatnikov Anilator laughing
    I understand you will burn Lighters Zippo, Armata because cardboard, Ukrainians will not let lie.

    How old are you, baby? 18 at least have already? Can you tell me if you live in Lithuania, or how did you move the right Balts to more bread places?
  31. Cobra77
    Cobra77 15 January 2016 18: 02 New
    +1
    Quote: Sausuolis
    What are you witty.


    Go learn Russian, boy! You look useful, as you grow up, not only to show Baltic patriotism in Russian forums ...
    1. _my opinion
      _my opinion 15 January 2016 19: 43 New
      +1
      Quote: cobra77
      Quote: Sausuolis
      What are you witty.


      Go learn Russian, boy! You look useful, as you grow up, not only to show Baltic patriotism in Russian forums ...

      as our class teacher said a long time ago: "he spoke poorly, spoke Russian poorly"
  32. Pete mitchell
    Pete mitchell 15 January 2016 18: 55 New
    +7
    I do not agree with the title of the article - you can occupy it by force, but the fact that it itself fits under .., I hope the children do not read. This is not an occupation, this is another word, who will help to formulate? : -?
  33. 31rus
    31rus 15 January 2016 21: 39 New
    0
    Dear, without total control on the ground, NATO can collapse, that's why everywhere and everywhere "Russia is the aggressor" and the obligatory presence on the ground to support the "democratic government"
  34. neo1200
    neo1200 15 January 2016 22: 27 New
    0
    The American presence in the Baltic countries is more propaganda than military. Despite all the statements about the greatness of the United States that its president makes, the Americans are not ready for a big war with Russia.
  35. Gerhard
    Gerhard 16 January 2016 08: 28 New
    0
    It's no secret that being a US ally is a deal with the devil

    in Lithuania they think otherwise, but in the Russian Federation are they already going to free the "oppressed"?
    In addition, an increase in the military presence in the Baltic States not only undermines stability on the continent.

    and actions in Crimea and Donbass mean "do not undermine"?
    At the same time, the statements of some Lithuanian authorities about the need to deploy NATO ground bases in Eastern Europe personify a policy to destroy international law.

    can this sovereign right of Lithuania decide? Or is it not profitable for Russia to undermine everything at once?
    Why am I? And besides, it all looks like an excuse for a new war ...