For flight tests preparing a new training aircraft CP-10

Specialists of Design Bureau aviation Technologies ”is preparing a lightweight single-engine jet trainer SR-10 for flight factory tests, enterprise director Maxim Mironov told Interfax-AVN.

“In the very near future, the stage of factory flight tests of the CP-10 aircraft will begin. In December, 2015, the first prototype machine has already completed two flights, having spent in the air 40 and 20 minutes, respectively, ”Mironova newspaper quoted as saying MIC.

“The tests will last about three months,” said the director. “The time needed to complete the CP-10 flight test with at least 20 test flights will largely depend on the weather.”

According to him, the car will be in demand by the military. “The Russian Air Force needs a lightweight single-engined two-seat training aircraft as an intermediate vehicle between a promising aircraft with a Yak-152 piston engine and a combat training Yak-130,” Mironov said.

Developer Help: “CP-10 is made according to the normal aerodynamic design with one turbojet engine. Take-off weight of the aircraft: the maximum - 2700 kg, normal - 2400 kg. The aircraft will have a maximum flight speed of up to 900 km / h and a flight speed of 700 km / h. The maximum range of a half – ta is 1500 km, the practical ceiling is 6000 m ”.

Comments

[Mountain shooter]

Quite light and cheap. All the same, the Yak 130 is almost an attack aircraft. And this one, and even with such an original wing - just right.

[Darkmor]

But why do we need the reverse sweep of the wing on a training aircraft?
I would understand if we had a serial fighter with the same wing, for the peculiarities of avionics and maneuvering which would need a similar training aircraft.

[Yak-3P]

controllability is much better, and this is necessary on a flying school desk ... you just weren’t in the sky .. spend money --- fly at least 20 minutes and you will understand that the parachute is for the custodians

[Susul]

Features of avionics and aircraft behavior are programmed in the on-board computer of the training aircraft.

[Conscience]

then it’s going to be in a series or in Syria

[RDX]

Reverse sweep improves maneuverability, most likely it will be used; for sports aerobatic teams, instead of YAKs, in addition to training purposes, this wing shape will be tested for practicality, for further implementation in advanced combat aircraft models. This is purely my personal opinion))) there are also sketches of aircraft with four wings)))

[Inok10]

Quote: RDX

Reverse sweep improves maneuverability, most likely it will be used; for sports aerobatic teams, instead of YAKs, in addition to training purposes, this wing shape will be tested for practicality, for further implementation in advanced combat aircraft models. This is purely my personal opinion))) there are also sketches of aircraft with four wings)))

.. reverse sweep there is only -10 .. and used for compactness, smart people explained ..

On December 25, 2015, without much publicity, at the Oreshkovo aerodrome (Vorotynsk, Kaluga Region), which previously belonged to the DOSAAF Training Aviation Center (now the Albatros Aero flying club), the first prototype of the lightweight two-seat training and sports trainer aircraft made its first flight SR-10, developed by Design Bureau Modern Aviation Technologies LLC (SAT Design Bureau, Moscow) under the direction of D.A. Kibetz. In the first flight, pilot test pilot Yu.M. Kabanov and pilot M. Mironov. The prototype is equipped with an AI-25TL engine (apparently used).

..

[Sweles]

and in Russian it was impossible to write TTX? Why should I translate the performance characteristics of our aircraft? Or did they immediately export this thing? It’s impossible to tell in more detail which engine, how much ours and not ours are there? They throw information like a bone to dogs ...

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Sveles

Information is thrown like a bone to dogs ...

The cold warrior is coming, no one will now spread the full performance characteristics of you. Rather, soon you will not receive this, which is in the article.

[Corsair0304]

Quote: Sveles

and in Russian it was impossible to write TTX?

Yes, please ... the photo is clickable.
Respect to the designers, they are trying something new, unusual. So maybe something will be created on the basis of the Su-47 "Berkut". It's still a good device, it's a pity that nothing else has been heard about it.

[inkass_98]

Quote: Corsair0304

something on the basis of the Su-47 "Berkut" will be created. It's still a good device, it's a pity that nothing else has been heard about it.

Not audible, because it was experimental, not serial. They flew around, tested the control features of the reverse sweep wing, decided not to bother so far.

[Sirocco]

Quote: Sveles

It is impossible to tell in more detail which engine, how many are ours and not ours?

You can why not.

So far, one AI-25TLSh twin-turbo jet engine with a thrust of 1850 kgf has been considered as a power plant, but the possibility of installing modern RD-1700 and AL-55I engines with a thrust of 1700-1760 kgf has been worked out. The aircraft control system is mechanical, with hydraulic booster. Depending on the requirements and financial capabilities of the customer, the information and control field of the cabin can be formed from both traditional electromechanical devices and modern multi-functional indicators. The crew of the SR-10 aircraft will be placed on highly reliable ejection seats of the K-36LT-3,5 type.

Everything else you want to know about is MYSTERY. ))))

[Sweles]

Quote: Sirocco

Everything else you want to know about is MYSTERY. )))

thank you for the information, but the secret is a vulgar word for those who want to seem more than they really are. I don’t understand what secret can be from this small plane, it’s not even a military one. Such planes in America every year create several pieces and do not make any secrets from this.
Or do they also want to hang weapons on him? You can not answer.

[Sirocco]

Well, why, I’ll answer, I really want to be more than it seems somewhat.))))

SR-10, developed by KB Modern Aviation Technologies LLC (SAT Design Bureau) - a team that recently recovered and managed to return to the sky - after almost a half-century break! - the famous jet aircraft A.S.Yakovlev Design Bureau Yak-30 and Yak-32. SR-10 stands for "jet aircraft with a sweep of the wing -10 °." Negative sweep along the leading edge is one of the main “highlights” of the aerodynamic layout of this aircraft, the construction of which, in principle, uses already tested and tested materials and technologies. This, according to developers, should reduce the technical risks when creating an aircraft. Due to the widespread use of modern composite materials in the design of the airframe, it was possible to significantly reduce the weight of the airframe and increase the resource.... Of course, to believe that a small "private" design team is able to create and launch an efficient modern jet aircraft flying at a speed of almost 900 km / h, and even more so that the military will buy it, is not easy.

A private company developing this aircraft. That is, at least, a trade secret.
Well, then, whether there will be dopa on it or not, don’t go to the grandmother, the military will.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Sirocco

Well, then, whether there will be dopa on it or not, don’t go to the grandmother, the military will.

Spreading my mind, I came to the conclusion:
1. This is a reliable means of control and adjustment of art fire and other shock systems;
2. You can’t imagine a better way to deal with UAVs! The rest is all expensive, and if not expensive, then in range / height it does not fit;
3. The load is small - only 300 kg ... only guerrillas in the mountains to drive. Nothing is said about REO. Radar? navigation (GLONAS / GPS)? EW? Well, there is every connection.
4. Berkut - LL, so I don't want to believe that such a powerful idea was simply abandoned! Apparently "Zyablik" is the first swallow in the series of aircraft with USC.
IMHO.

[faridg7]

Good old AI-25. Nothing will change, just as the cadets are cramming the albatross engine now, they will. Damn, I like this engine-Father flew on the Yak40, I remember he had several badges for an accident-free flight - 5000 hours, 7000, 14000 ... A reliable unit. here, of course, for a sports airplane, the throttle response (in my opinion) is not enough: 12 seconds is an eternity, but it is very reliable.
Oh, and it’s like they collected it in Ukraine. Will the piglet be put from there?

[Sirocco]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Quite light and cheap.

It would be good to bring it at a business class price, and to the general public, helicopters like Robinson, or Eurocopter, 2,4,6, local ones, and load factories, at least our UAZ, so to speak aviation to the masses. After all, small aircraft are buried here, and the price tags for imported aircraft, (SLA) are horse-drawn. This is the idea inspired by this crumb))))

[seti]

It is interesting that he has a wing like that of the Su-47 Golden Eagle. Apparently this is a plane as a cheap replacement for the Yak-130. After all, there are many flight clubs, not everyone trains combat pilots, there are civilian amateurs on all of Jacob's. And there is a need for such an aircraft.

[Misha Honest]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Quite light and cheap. All the same, the Yak 130 is almost an attack aircraft. And this one, and even with such an original wing - just right.

Handsome man! For some reason, the sparrow reminded me! I want this - to fly to the cottage. Dreams Dreams...

[meriem1]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Quite light and cheap. All the same, the Yak 130 is almost an attack aircraft. And this one, and even with such an original wing - just right.

It is no longer the original wing! Su = 37 BERKUT. Reverse sweep wing.

[DefakeR]

Here is the ideal option for a multi-functional drone :-) Only insert unmanned stuffing and weapon options and application tactics to calculate, yes, think through such a nice argument :-) :-) :-) and when did Tyumen fly under the Jatan flag? Pts interesting question ... chur chur mattress

[venaya]

An interesting aircraft, even a scheme with a reverse sweep of the wing is implemented.
I hope that its cost will be insignificant, which will be very useful for us now

[avt]

Quote: venaya

An interesting aircraft, even a scheme with a reverse sweep of the wing is implemented.

Yes - it looks cool, outwardly, even a pretty beautiful bird turned out, a kind of goldfinch sassy. Neat like that. We wish them good luck and serial production!

[Boa kaa]

Quote: avt

We wish them good luck and serial production!

I agree!
But here's an ambush: a manufacturing base? The old (in the sense of the former) - everything is clogged with SDO and work for export. And here are the composites, this is not a pound of raisins from saiki to be picked for you!
And dviglo can be more powerful to put, so that the thrust-to-weight ratio is close to 1! Then it will be "swallow"!

[avt]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

But here's an ambush: a manufacturing base?

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

Yes, and dviglo can be more powerful to put,

The ambush was still a big ambush as to where to do what and what to choose from. But really, the DOSAAF machine for training pilots and the Yak -130 are expensive for this;

[Wedmak]

Check out the reverse sweep of the wing. I have not seen such a scheme on any training aircraft.

[Proxima]

Quote: Wedmak

Check out the reverse sweep of the wing. I have not seen such a scheme on any training aircraft.

Who can enlighten, an airplane with a forward swept wing - this is already considered a "normal aerodynamic design"?

[Wedmak]

In my opinion this is a normal scheme - wings in front, tail with elevators at the back. Abnormal is a duck, tailless, wing and others.

[Susul]

This is a long-standing scheme, piston planes still flew with it, and you can also see it on some sports

[Hydrograph]

Normal (ordinary) A. s. - GO (stabilizer) is located behind (in flight) the wing. This scheme is most widespread due to a simple solution to the issues of longitudinal stability and longitudinal controllability in all flight modes.

[donavi49]

There is an extremely small angle, given that the aircraft is cheap and aluminum at 100%, strength should be ensured.

At the same time, at such a small angle, the question is still, why is this sweep, besides marketing? The Americans and Sukhoi experimented and gained advantages at a much larger angle, but even there the wings scattered, because the loads were beyond the limits of existing materials.

This aircraft is assembled at the Aircraft Unit under garage conditions, by students and enthusiasts. The issue of mass production at the Aircraft Unit without multi-billion infusions (in fact, to build a modern plant) is unrealistic, which means we need to look for a site.

[Wedmak]

At the same time, at such a small angle, the question is still, why is this sweep, besides marketing? The Americans and Sukhoi experimented and gained advantages at a much larger angle, but even there the wings scattered, because the loads were beyond the limits of existing materials.

I'm certainly not a pro in aerodynamics, but it seems to me and a small angle makes sense. For an example of small size, look at the PGO at SU-34. It would seem that small wings for such an aircraft do not solve anything. However, they allow you to keep control on takeoff and landing, and are directly involved in intensive maneuvering.
I remember with the reverse sweep of the wing, such a phenomenon as a stall of the air flow decreases. That is, the air does not go along the wing, but normally flows around it creating additional lifting force.

[Proxima]

[quote = Wedmak] [quote]
I remember with the reverse sweep of the wing, such a phenomenon as a stall of the air flow decreases. That is, the air does not go along the wing, but normally flows around it creating additional lifting force. [/ Quote]
Backward sweep has many advantages, but also many disadvantages. The main plus is phenomenal maneuverability. The main disadvantage is the very high load on the wing. Why do you think the program for the production of forward-swept aircraft SU-47 "Berkut" was curtailed? Yes, because it was at this time that variable thrust vectoring engines were created, greatly increasing the maneuverability of the fighter. Therefore, to show off with the creation of aircraft with a reverse arrow has lost ALL SENSE. The question is, why have they created an aircraft with such a sweep now? What plane are the cadets going to fly later? This is a completely different aerodynamics! Why should a cadet learn to fly an airship to fly an airplane?

[Wedmak]

Why do you think the program for the production of forward-swept aircraft SU-47 "Berkut" was curtailed? Yes, because it was at this time that variable thrust vectoring engines were created, greatly increasing the maneuverability of the fighter.

Yes, the program has been minimized. True, not only because of the appearance of engines with OBT. Namely, because of the destruction of the wing, there are really very heavy loads, stupidly there are no necessary materials for such a wing to serve for at least some long time. So when such ones appear, to make friends with the OB and the wing with the reverse sweep - we get a completely different type of aircraft. Aircraft will smoke on the sidelines.

The question is, why did you now create an airplane with such sweep?

Why not? On a light airplane it’s quite good for itself. And the angle is not so big, the loads were probably calculated.
Further questions are not for me at all. I am only discussing the very design of the aircraft. An interesting glider is how it will behave in flight and how it differs from the same L-39 in control.

[Corsair0304]

Quote: Wedmak

I have not seen such a scheme on any training aircraft.

Yes, arbitrarily:
MiG-ATKOS Training aircraft of the new generation with a reverse sweep wing. The UTS MiG-ATKOS variant is undergoing flight tests at the flight base in the LII of Zhukovsky. The reverse sweep wing was successfully used on the S-37 Berkut experimental aircraft. The MiG-ATKOS prototype was prepared for comparative tests with the MiG-AT base aircraft to assess the maneuverability characteristics.

[Wild_grey_wolf]

An advanced device, clear sky crew of such birds.

[Yak-3P]

handsome !!! I think the flying clubs will be happy with this .. they will give it .. 52nd and 55th already all regulations have passed a long time .. repairs for repairs .. "and I hunt to fly" !!!

[Wolka]

a good tactical substitute for Po-2 "Corn" ...

[donavi49]

Not. This is an ultralight type of the same Pampa or K-8, it’s only easier, without any weapons, to fly cleanly double.

However, the question is, is it necessary?

MO chose the classic and global scheme - Vint-Reaktiv and paid for contracts for the Yak-152 (albeit with a foreign engine) and Yak-130.

CP-10 does not climb here, because it is an airplane of the Yak-152 level in terms of training opportunities.

No, you can insert both CP-10 and a couple more types, but they are not needed, that is, a real training program requires 2 aircraft - basic training (MO chose the Yak-152) and thematic-in-depth (MO chose the Yak-130).

[DarkMatter]

As far as I know, this plane was precisely the competitor of the Yak-152, lost to him and now they (in KB) decided that now their plane is not a competitor, but is an intermediate link between the Yaks (152 and 130), and they are trying to sell it to the troops . I do not know if there really is a need with it. If before there was a lot of money and you could afford it, now I would choose the country's security and the purchase of really missing equipment, and not any twists and turns, unfortunately, because I would also like to support private developers.

the photo was good, maybe it can be sold to foreign natives, I don’t think much, and a beautiful view is sometimes more important for them

[donavi49]

Well, landing a cadet immediately on a reagent is somewhat innovative, and aviation does not like such sharp innovations. Therefore, it is obvious that the classic school desk Yak-152 won.

The question is, why do we need another intermediate plane? Now how - they are taught to fly, the basics of navigation, approaches, simple maneuvers, in general the basic course, on the Yak-52 (in the future, the Yak-152). Yak-130 retraining (the identity of the cabs with the Yak-152 will allow to shrink the retraining course) and the thematic, basic flight course.

Where is the CP-10 niche visible? Even if you take an optimistic flight twice as cheap as the L-39 flight hour, you will still have to retrain on the Yak-130 / L-39 for the full course. It will come out +/- the same as a result, if you break the course into 3 aircraft.

[Yak-3P]

Yes, they will not give the 130th for accounting .. expensive .. until

[Ros 56]

Quote: donavi49

Well, putting a cadet right on the reagent is somewhat innovative

First of all, you are mistaken. Everything depended on what school it is, in the sense of whom it is preparing. fighters or transporters. And they started on the L-29 and that's okay. Link to the photo, for some reason I can’t insert.

http://www.avsim.su/forum/uploads/monthly_08_2008/post-3220-1218476512
_thumb.jpg

[Yak-3P]

you with shoigu thumped ?? information offshoot ?? I am in heaven in any form .. the cadet is difficult to learn for the student .. and this is the desk .. onto the 52 handle on the loop with 2 hands you pull after the bell - you don’t understand ...

[donavi49]

So. Yak-52 will be, or rather will be in a new form - Yak-152. The question is about the CP-10 (he lost in the Yak-152 design-and-design competition) that Makhachkala wants to do after they build the Aircraft Unit for federal money.

[Yak-3P]

if they make a hydrach on the handle, he won’t be able to .. we’ll cut everyone on the air flight ..

[Aleks tv]

Quote: donavi49

CP-10 does not climb here, because it is an airplane of the Yak-152 level in terms of training opportunities.

I’m kind of not a pilot at all, but a simple Tankman, but let me put in my five cents

In a conversation with the flyers, it was said briefly - the YAK-130 is a complex machine. This is NOT a flying school desk.
The flying school desk (reactive) is still a Czech machine, so it needs a replacement.
I believe the words of my friend, PIC MIG-31.

[Yak-3P]

yes you Vasya !! yes no words .. you yourself corn .. on the cob .. don’t know don’t torment your fingers

[Aleks tv]

Quote: Yak-3P

yes you Vasya !! yes no words .. you yourself corn .. on the cob .. don’t know don’t torment your fingers

Comrade Smoke, you would use "quote", then it would be clear to whom you are addressing)))

I’m kind of just with humor, without any raids))).

[Ros 56]

Well, what’s it like that per person, well, you don’t know, it happens, but you’re on the cob. Laughing out loud.

[Ros 56]

Quote: Volka

a good tactical substitute for Po-2 "Corn" ...

Something I did not understand, what are you talking about? Or on New Year's holidays the movie was watched "Heavenly slug". Yes, Po-2 was a flying desk, and it was in operation for about 50 years, then it was replaced by the Yak-18, then the Yak-12, and finally the Yak-52, well, and then everything went well, and ASK switched to a miserable existence with outstretched hand. For example, in our club there are one and a half aircraft left, the golden years have passed, there is no such need for SR-10 now, if only to sell over the hill, there is simply no money. Yes, and pilots) no one trains DOSAAF instructors, there used to be the Volchansk school, then it was transferred to Zaporozhye, but what is there now, you all know. Yes, and the military schools cut down, our OVVAUL them. Alas, Polbina does not exist. By the way, Yuri Gagarin studied here. So the prospects for SR, I think, are rather vague.
The only thing that pleases, in spite of all the efforts of our government, by no means is it possible to kill the healthy desire of our designers, athletes and aviation sports enthusiasts in general to do this. Thin - poor, somewhere at his own expense, but men do not give up, and not only men. By the way, today I don’t remember what program on TV there will be a film about the World Champion in aerobatics Svetlana Kapanina, I personally saw what she can do, was with us, I had throat eggs rising from fear for her. Sorry, it's boiling.

[amt2011]

on yak 130, if desired, it was possible to carry out a combat mission))

[lilian]

The news is already somehow unexpected. For the first time I learned about the salette and not just another project, but already took off.
It remains to be hoped that they will not test as long as the Angara will be released soon.

[glasha3032]

A waste of money. During the competition for the supply of TCBs to the Russian Air Force, two devices were introduced — the MiG TCB and the Yak-130, so Yak won and one of the reasons for the win was the presence of 2 engines on the TRAINING TRAINING PLANE!

[Yak-3P]

You are a little far from accounting .. the more different types the better at mastering the flight business .. and 2 engines are not a panacea for flight accidents .. maybe it gives some head start but not for accounting

[FID]

And they will build this car at the Aircraft Unit factory in Dagestan ... Impressive!

[Aleks tv]

Quote: SSI

And they will build this car at the Aircraft Unit factory in Dagestan ... Impressive!

Good day, Sergey.
Glad to hear that.

How do you like this car in a nutshell?
And explain, pliz, the phrase about the aircraft unit.

[FID]

Quote: Aleks tv

And explain, pliz, the phrase about the aircraft unit.

They plan to build there, in Makhachkala ... the aircraft factories in Russia are over ... And the trainer is needed, there are few jet elok left, and it is good to prepare "first graders" on piston engines, and then jet plants are needed ... of another class, this is already a "desk" for future combat pilots, but for the Civil Air Fleet this is quite ...

[Aleks tv]

Quote: SSI

They plan to build there, in Makhachkala ... aircraft factories in Russia are over ...

Clear.

On CP-10 is also clear.
Thank you.

[Alex_59]

Quote: SSI

The Yak-130 is still an aircraft of a different class, it is already a "desk" for future combat pilots, but for the Civil Air Fleet this is quite ...

For GVF, this CP-10 is also not a horse oats. GVF would be better L-410, M-101 or IL-103. Location shoulder to shoulder and performance characteristics are more suitable for civilians, more familiar.

[WUA 518]

Quote: SSI

aircraft factories in Russia are over.

Serezha, Alexey I welcome. The fact is that this aircraft is positioned as a fully Russian assembly, which fits perfectly into the import substitution program. Another question is whether the problem of wing torsion deformations is solved at such a sweep angle.

[FID]

Quote: WUA 518

Serezha, Alexey welcome

Hello Sasha! Most likely, the speed will not be too big ... Well, yes, 0.85M is maximum, and operational - well, 0.6-0.7M ... Therefore, I think it will not twist much ...

[Aleks tv]

Hi Sanya!

Quote: WUA 518

Quote: SSI

aircraft factories in Russia are over.

Serezha, Alexey I welcome. The fact is that this aircraft is positioned as a fully Russian assembly, which fits perfectly into the import substitution program. Another question is whether the problem of wing torsion deformations is solved at such a sweep angle.

Quote: SSI

Well, yes 0.85M is maximum, and operational - well, 0.6-0.7M ... Therefore, I think it will not twist much ...

Wah, how are you, flying, it's complicated ...
We didn’t try to switch to caterpillars)))

Guys, with the upcoming RUSSIAN holiday.
Happy New Year!

[WUA 518]

Quote: Aleks tv

Happy New Year!

Support!

[FID]

Quote: Aleks tv

Guys, with the upcoming RUSSIAN holiday.
Happy New Year!

Mutually!!!

[Alex_59]

Well done for building an airplane. Only the rationale seems to me somewhat strained - "we need an aircraft between the Yak-130 and Yak-52/152". What is it needed for? Specially for this aircraft to invent a new stage of training? In Soviet times, the Yak-52 + L-29/39 did quite well. So, in the place of the Ministry of Defense, I would refrain from mass purchases, concentrating the main efforts on the Yak-130. And this airplane would be positioned as the simplest jet aircraft for ROSTO and would have purchased in small quantities (unless, of course, in our realities, at least some money can be found for this at all). The rationale here is not in the terrible need for this aircraft, but in the support of young people. It will pay off with interest - it is better to glue the plane in the garage than sniff glue.

[kugelblitz]

The reverse sweep is more likely made by weight distribution, i.e. to reduce the size. The aircraft itself is composite and lighter than the Yak-130 several times. It has only one engine, it is simpler avionics.
Conclusion: the aircraft is most likely intended for flying clubs, athletes and private owners, and this is another niche. Because not everyone can afford a half-attack aircraft

[pavelty]

I don’t understand why this plane is needed? What does the Ministry of Defense want to acquire? We have that training in three stages is conducted by I-152 / it is not clear what / Yak-130? And how do they want to launch it in a series? Enthusiastic cries are not very clear .. well, yes, the idea is interesting, but practical application ..

[chunga-changa]

A muddy story with this plane. It is unclear who, it is unclear where, it is unclear what, it is unclear why and immediately with access to the very top. I think all this will end in a strange way, as it begins.

[fzr1000]

The plane was created by enthusiasts, as in the 30s. The Makhachkala plant would like to produce it, but ... when everyone dismissed CP10, the Makhachkala residents helped as they could. Now, what they are offered the maximum is to become a subcontractor in its production.

[Maksus]

The amateurish question - what do pilots of transport and long-range bomber aviation learn to fly on? And what is our role as a training helicopter?

[KBR109]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

All the same, the Yak 130 is almost an attack aircraft.

Throw verbal balancing act. A plane with many points of suspension, however, is not an attack aircraft.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: KBR109

All the same, the Yak 130 is almost an attack aircraft.

Throw verbal balancing act. A plane with many points of suspension, however, is not an attack aircraft.

Follow the advertisement! (С)
Ours have already announced that they are ready to let in the Yak-130 as a light attack aircraft. They are waiting for foreign orders.

[Maksus]

I completely agree, this is still a combat training aircraft. Not the 2x local attack aircraft.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Maksus

it's still a combat training aircraft. And not a 2-seater attack aircraft.

This is so, but I’m saying that we are ready to produce the Yak-130 and as a light attack aircraft:
"As the head of the Air Force Department of Rosoboronexport Sergei Kornev said earlier, Russia may convert the Yak-130 into an attack aircraft, if foreign customers have such a desire. "If they ask for an attack aircraft, we have another sample, but if the client wants such an aircraft based on the Yak-130, then additional time and money will be required, but this is a feasible thing," said Kornev.
And here's another:
"Yak-130 is designed to teach piloting skills to cadets of flight schools and the solution of combat missions when operating on ground and air targets, characteristic of aircraft of 4 and 5 generations. The highly reliable integrated control system with the possibility of reprogramming makes it possible to prepare a pilot for the Su-30, MiG-29, F-16 and F-15, Rafale, Typhoon, F-35 aircraft.
http://vz.ru/news/2015/8/27/763448.html
So I personally do not see sedition in my previous judgment.
Best regards,

[Letnab]

in YouTube about this plane a bunch of videos, how it was created, for what.

[marshes]

I wanted to ask, I didn’t get a grasp of the comments, What engine on this unit? What production, and the final cost of the specimen, preferably in dead raccoons.