Military Review

Rogozin: the presence of Serbia’s strong ally “will calm any aggressor”

89
A strong military ally will defend Serbia and will not allow the repetition of the 1999 g scenario, reports RIA News Statement by Dmitry Rogozin, who arrived in Belgrade to participate in the Russian-Serbian Economic Cooperation Committee.




When Sputnik asked if Serbia could count on Russia’s help in the event of a possible repeat of the 1999 scenario of the year when Yugoslavia (later split into Serbia and Montenegro) was bombed by NATO, the Russian deputy prime minister replied: “Having a strong military power - an ally of Serbia reassure any aggressor. "

“Of course, now Russia is not Russia 1999 of the year. And the president is different, and the people in power are different. Yes, and our army, our aerospace forces, probably, you see, demonstrate in Syria that Russia has already moved to another, major league, ”he explained.

According to Rogozin, “if Yugoslavia had a system in 1999 that was similar to the C-300 complex, there would have been no such tragedy as the virtually unresponsive execution of the country when using high-precision long-range weapons».

“And the Serbs had nothing to answer. The Serbian army was determined to fight, fight with the enemy, but with the enemy of the previous generation. And that is why no one decided to conduct a ground operation either in Kosovo or in any other part of Yugoslavia. Because they knew that the Serbs would fight for every house, ”said the Deputy Prime Minister. “Therefore, the NATO countries chose to be shot as darts in darts, and Serbia could only respond with the old air defense systems.”

According to him, Moscow is ready to supply weapons to Serbia.

“Russia is ready to supply all weapons systems not prohibited for export, but our specialists must determine what is optimal for Serbia and, second, what the Serbs can really afford for money,” said Rogozin.

“Many questions are caused by what kind of armaments NATO countries have near Serbia. The information that the shock systems will appear in the neighbors of the Serbs does not cause optimism, ”he said.

A Russian official recalled that neighboring Croatia intends to acquire strike weapons. “The question arises: against whom? Against whom in the region is a rocket system being acquired with a radius of 270-300 kilometers (this radius does not extend beyond the borders of countries neighboring Croatia)? ”

At the same time, Rogozin stressed that possible Russian supplies should not be perceived by neighbors as steps directed against them. "Not. This is (weapon) for Serbia, it is not against someone, ”he added.

Earlier it was reported that Serbia received a request for defensive armament, which is currently being considered by the Russian side.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vend
    Vend 12 January 2016 17: 32
    18
    A subtle hint of fat circumstances
    1. meriem1
      meriem1 12 January 2016 17: 38
      +4
      Quote: Wend
      A subtle hint of fat circumstances

      Yeah! Kosovars there tremble finely !!!
      1. cniza
        cniza 12 January 2016 17: 44
        24
        If only the little brothers did not wag their tail, but decided and firmly adhered to their line.
        1. bort4145
          bort4145 12 January 2016 18: 27
          +4
          It is not necessary to identify the state (government of the country) and the people. Their interests are not always the same. wink
          1. Xergey
            Xergey 12 January 2016 23: 41
            0
            Nevertheless, we are stepping on the same rake, all the little brothers and the government are the only traitors, they themselves chose if they should betray, then you can help, and now they want silk panties in the EU and not in customs union, it already was.
        2. APASUS
          APASUS 12 January 2016 18: 40
          +9
          Quote: cniza
          If only the little brothers did not wag their tail, but decided and firmly adhered to their line.

          And the Serbs don’t wag their tail, they pray for Russia there. They have their own three traitors, their own Gorbachev and company ...........
          1. Your friend
            Your friend 12 January 2016 18: 43
            -1
            Quote: APASUS
            Quote: cniza
            If only the little brothers did not wag their tail, but decided and firmly adhered to their line.

            And the Serbs don’t wag their tail, they pray for Russia there. They have their own three traitors, their own Gorbachev and company ...........

            They don’t really pray:
            http://ruserbia.com/politics/3780-serby-predpochitayut-vstupleniyu-v-es-soyuz-s-
            rossiej
            1. bort4145
              bort4145 12 January 2016 18: 55
              +2

              People are different, and the media have learned how to make up the "necessary" report correctly.
            2. Dryuya2
              Dryuya2 12 January 2016 23: 30
              0
              Rogozin - interview
            3. APASUS
              APASUS 13 January 2016 19: 02
              0
              Quote: Your friend
              Quote: APASUS
              Quote: cniza
              If only the little brothers did not wag their tail, but decided and firmly adhered to their line.

              And the Serbs don’t wag their tail, they pray for Russia there. They have their own three traitors, their own Gorbachev and company ...........

              They don’t really pray:
              http://ruserbia.com/politics/3780-serby-predpochitayut-vstupleniyu-v-es-soyuz-s-

              rossiej

              You saw a lot of such posters, many peoples expressed their support to us at a simple everyday level after a downed plane in Syria ???
        3. Alexey Boukin
          Alexey Boukin 12 January 2016 19: 00
          0
          Quote: cniza
          If only the little brothers did not wag their tail, but decided and firmly adhered to their line.

          A perfectly logical question arises: do we need the Serbs? He is the most important in this situation.
        4. kubanec
          kubanec 12 January 2016 19: 25
          10
          ------ If only the little brothers do not wag their tail -------- LET THE BROTHERS DO NOT "FORCES" THEY SHOULD GIVE CONFIDENCE THAT RUSSIA WILL NOT THROW THEM AS IN 99
    2. vyinemeynen
      vyinemeynen 12 January 2016 18: 07
      +1
      But the Serbs had nothing to answer.
      of course nothing, they themselves refused in 1999 to buy our C300 EVEN IN DEBT (in long installments) !!!
      1. Your friend
        Your friend 12 January 2016 18: 16
        +2
        Quote: vyinemeynen
        But the Serbs had nothing to answer.
        of course nothing, they themselves refused in 1999 to buy our C300 EVEN IN DEBT (in long installments) !!!

        In the elections, Serbs vote for pro-European parties, and therefore for NATO membership, which bombed them. It's funny that our clowns are again going to defend the "brothers" (and the Serbs ask us to defend them, or are we again getting into our own business?), As in 1914, I hope everyone remembers how it ended.
        1. bort4145
          bort4145 12 January 2016 18: 25
          +1
          If you talk like that, then can we say all the inhabitants of the USSR voted for the collapse of their country?
          1. Your friend
            Your friend 12 January 2016 18: 29
            0
            Quote: bort4145
            If you talk like that, then can we say all the inhabitants of the USSR voted for the collapse of their country?

            Quote: bort4145
            If you talk like that, then can we say all the inhabitants of the USSR voted for the collapse of their country?

            Do you want to call into question the results of the Serb vote for pro-European parties?
          2. AID.S
            AID.S 12 January 2016 18: 46
            +5
            Quote: bort4145
            If you talk like that, then can we say all the inhabitants of the USSR voted for the collapse of their country?

            At least in the presidential election of the RSFSR on 12.06.91, 45 million voted for Yeltsin, and then there was a collapse ...
            1. bort4145
              bort4145 12 January 2016 18: 54
              0
              In-in, the main thing is "to drive correctly over the ears" - "people are eating". Ukraine is a close and living example.
        2. lukke
          lukke 12 January 2016 18: 33
          +1
          It's funny that our clowns are again going to protect the "brothers"
          Yeah, again on the same rake. And then the leader will change and ... And that’s not even the point - we don’t have allies who live distantly from our civilization, so ... fellow travelers are mutually beneficial in the short term.
          Rogozin recently shot with the Serbian security forces (here you can envy everything as you like - he can’t get out of shooting ranges and has two award trunks for some merit), retired military officers quietly smoke aside .. so he probably had the idea to revive the Pan-Slavic brotherhood . Only all this we went through
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. bort4145
        bort4145 12 January 2016 18: 30
        +8
        But the Serbs had nothing to answer.
        of course nothing, they themselves
        And what would you say to the Afghans who supported the USSR, but did Shevarnadze and Co. say nothing to the request to take at least their families when our troops were withdrawn? What would you say to the fact that when NATO pulled the Serbia of the Russian Federation nothing real, at the state level, did it? Are these questions to the people or to that government?

        And it’s good that it’s right now wink Well, really want to hope.
        1. Your friend
          Your friend 12 January 2016 18: 33
          -6
          Quote: bort4145
          And what would you answer to the Afghans who supported the USSR, but did Shevarnadze and Co. keep silent about the request to take away at least their families during the withdrawal of our troops?

          What does the Afghans have to do with it?
          Quote: bort4145
          What would you answer to the fact that when NATO pulled the Serbia of the Russian Federation nothing, it did nothing at the state level?

          What should I answer? Serbia was neither our ally then, nor now, with what fright the Russian Federation was supposed to do something?
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 12 January 2016 18: 46
      +5
      Even in the dreary situation in which Serbia found itself in 1999, the Serbs could have survived - after 3 months of intense bombing, the democrats had already seen an acute shortage of humanitarian bombs and missiles, and a bloody ground operation against people with a 500-year-old tradition of guerrilla warfare today's western creatures the gut is thin - these are not fanatical Nibelungs from the Wehrmacht. But here, on behalf of the EBN, the peacekeeper Chernomyrdin rushed to Belgrade and persuaded Milosevic to surrender to the grace of the good civilized democratic victors from NATO. What this mercy turned into is well known.
      But the thing is the past, and as for the present time, the very fact of the presence of the S-400 is a wonderful prevention against the peddlers of democracy
    4. valokordin
      valokordin 12 January 2016 19: 45
      +2
      Quote: Wend
      A subtle hint of fat circumstances

      And in 1999 Russia could help Yugoslavia if the country did not have a treacherous leadership that was ready to bend to the United States and NATO and lick, and Primakov’s turn, although he was praised, was a demonstration of political impotence.
    5. Wolverine
      Wolverine 12 January 2016 23: 07
      0
      Yeah, gentlemen the assessors have broken the ice ... (Twelve chairs)
    6. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 13 January 2016 09: 10
      0
      It is necessary to help, or rather not for free, but to sell weapons to all those who suffer from US expansion and arbitrariness so that they can protect themselves from their military aggression.
  2. Persistent
    Persistent 12 January 2016 17: 34
    12
    You need to be a three-core president to find time for everything. But does he even rest OUR Vladimir ???
    1. kurs66
      kurs66 12 January 2016 17: 39
      11
      The position is not one to rest))) The homeland is in danger, the rest will wait;)
      1. Sober
        Sober 12 January 2016 18: 09
        +2
        Quote: kurs66
        Homeland is in danger, rest will wait

        The real president of his country.
      2. Persistent
        Persistent 12 January 2016 18: 18
        +2
        The position is not one to rest))) The homeland is in danger, the rest will wait;)

        You're not right !!! SUCH President needs rest to live longer and bring more benefits to Russia !!!
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 12 January 2016 17: 40
      +4
      Quote: Persistent
      You need to be a three-core president to find time for everything. But does he even rest OUR Vladimir ???

      You, true, did not notice, but there is no word in this material about Vladimir. And he is unlikely to be personally involved in the implementation of the contract for the supply of defensive weapons to Serbia - he will put a maximum signature on the decision.
      You should not be such an enthusiastic loyal subject. It looks silly.
      1. Sober
        Sober 12 January 2016 18: 10
        +3
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        It looks silly.

        It’s regrettable that it’s stupid for you.
      2. Persistent
        Persistent 12 January 2016 18: 37
        -1
        It looks silly.

        It is foolish to talk like you !!! "maximum signature under the decision will put" laughing laughing laughing fool Not so simple about the signature of an amateur. This is not Boriska drunk ....
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 12 January 2016 18: 44
          0
          Quote: Persistent
          It’s regrettable that it’s stupid for you.

          Quote: Persistent
          Not so simple about the signature of an amateur. This is not Boriska drunk ....

          "Do not make yourself an idol" - have you heard such a commandment?
          1. Persistent
            Persistent 12 January 2016 18: 47
            0
            "Do not make yourself an idol" - have you heard such a commandment?

            Thank ! I heard !! Therefore, my judgments about the deeds of everyone I write about.
          2. Mavrikiy
            Mavrikiy 12 January 2016 20: 52
            +1
            And, YOU have heard: "do not judge, let you not be judged"
            1. Persistent
              Persistent 13 January 2016 20: 20
              0
              And, YOU have heard: "do not judge, let you not be judged"

              Judgments and your judgments are different things, well-read you are mine !!!! fool laughing
    3. meriem1
      meriem1 12 January 2016 17: 40
      0
      http://politikus.ru/video/43891-putin-nikogda-ne-spit.html

      Putin never sleeps. And so far .. you can sleep peacefully!
      1. WINovikov
        WINovikov 12 January 2016 19: 33
        +3
        Or maybe he always sleeps? Otherwise, why such a mess in the country. All constitutional norms have been violated: the right to housing, the right to free medical care, the right to education (what is passed off as education is). And the "guarantor" is silent, which means either he is sleeping, or everything suits him.
        1. Mavrikiy
          Mavrikiy 12 January 2016 21: 00
          +1
          Something you have painfully categorically turned out: "it means either he is sleeping, or everything suits him." Maybe he is not sleeping, maybe not everything suits him. Or maybe the time has not come to deal with the Livanovs. I think you can hardly see from the sofa, however, as well as me.
          And I beg grandpa to spit out the cigarette, you see, you won't need "free medical aid".
    4. nemec55
      nemec55 12 January 2016 18: 34
      +6
      You need to be a three-core president to find time for everything. But does he even rest OUR Vladimir ???

      Deflection not counted wassat
      You, true, did not notice, but there is no word in this material about Vladimir.
      1. Persistent
        Persistent 12 January 2016 18: 44
        -3
        Deflection not counted

        Before whom ?? Before you ?? Here everyone expresses his opinion. I personally don’t get paid for it.
  3. Alexez
    Alexez 12 January 2016 17: 38
    +6
    Croatia has already been invited to NATO and Montenegro ...
    Serbs, it's time to think!
    1. g1v2
      g1v2 12 January 2016 17: 48
      15
      Serbia will also be in NATO, despite all the kisses on the gums. And in my opinion the fact that we did not defend them was the only right decision. Yugoslavia was no friend to us, and even now it is not. But the Serbian elites are eager in the EU and NATO. And last year, the Minister of Defense of Serbia made a whole speech about a strategic alliance with America. They bent them easily and they did not strongly resist this, but why protect someone who is not ready to fight for his land? Well, only if it is profitable for us. I personally don’t see any benefit - the same Montenegro won’t even have access to the sea. hi
      1. The black
        The black 12 January 2016 18: 06
        +6
        oh, how would you like you to make a mistake in your forecast, but .... I have to agree with you ... sad
      2. Your friend
        Your friend 12 January 2016 18: 19
        0
        Quote: g1v2
        Serbia will also be in NATO, despite all the kisses on the gums. And in my opinion the fact that we did not defend them was the only right decision. Yugoslavia was no friend to us, and even now it is not. But the Serbian elites are eager in the EU and NATO. And last year, the Minister of Defense of Serbia made a whole speech about a strategic alliance with America. They bent them easily and they did not strongly resist this, but why protect someone who is not ready to fight for his land? Well, only if it is profitable for us. I personally don’t see any benefit - the same Montenegro won’t even have access to the sea. hi

        This is the national Serbian sport, when it squeezes - yelling to Russia "help, brother", and as soon as it lets go, they immediately become European people and spit on Russian barbarians. It is strange that we are led to this every time. (((
  4. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 12 January 2016 17: 39
    +1
    Honestly twofold opinion, both about the article and the Serbs. Sometimes you just want to ask, we will help you, we will not give weak insults! But you don’t act like a certain Turk, don’t you hit us in the back? And don’t believe the answer ! because we were betrayed too often, and they will betray us more than once, and we will forgive again, we are Russia.
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 12 January 2016 17: 44
      +3
      Well, Serbs, unlike the Turks, are civilized people, and do not dream of dreams of the revival of the Ottoman Empire. As for the betrayal, we left them alone with NATO in the 99th.
      1. Sober
        Sober 12 January 2016 18: 13
        +2
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        we left them alone with NATO in the 99th.

        Exactly! And they believed and waited for us, they knew that we would always turn our shoulders. They believed and hoped. Only our shoulder then bent to the ground.
      2. Your friend
        Your friend 12 January 2016 18: 24
        -5
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        Well, Serbs, unlike the Turks, are civilized people, and do not dream of dreams of the revival of the Ottoman Empire. As for the betrayal, we left them alone with NATO in the 99th.

        Serbs dream of Greater Serbia, like the Bulgarians of Greater Bulgaria (only Wishlist did not grow). Both those and others more than once on this burned with their Yugoslavia, the Balkan wars.
        Why on earth did Russia have to help them in 99.?
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 12 January 2016 21: 39
        +1
        I humbly ask you to excuse me for intruding on a lively discussion, but I could not restrain myself.
        I agree with you, and I would like to add, so that the opponents can be more understandable, if where wrong, then please generously forgive.
        "civilized people", I think all people are civilized. It's just that civilizations are different. There is Teretsk "wild civilization", why wild, because it does not look like us. Serbs, it seems to me, are practically us, but in different geographic and historical conditions. Despite all the cataclysms, we have always had regions where it was calm and where you could concentrate and take a breath (the exception is a citizen, so she is, "so that everyone"). The advantages of immense spaces to the disadvantages of off-road and disorder. If there is a war, then either in your garden or in your neighbor's. At this point, the mentality is shoulder to shoulder with a neighbor, and once again you will not look askance at the enemy and you will not say an extra word.
        As stated below, both Serbs and Bulgarians demand restoration of justice from comrades, but you refuse to Turks. Comrades, Greeks, give up Cyprus and Constantinople, and the destitute Poles, and we finally "collect our spans and crumbs." Globally civilized Germany is silent, but re-published "Mein Kampf" and dreams of "the economy of the regions." The same peace book, I have not read, "but I condemn." As for the United States, they do not need foreign lands for themselves, so rent for 50-100 years is enough. So I propose to close the topic of the revival of empires, since it is impossible to close it.
        Ugh, again long and boring.
    2. Sharapov
      Sharapov 12 January 2016 17: 45
      +4
      I agree, but the Serbs - they are - both ours and yours when you need to dance. At least sell armaments on a prepaid basis, and then write off your debts again ...
    3. Woodman
      Woodman 12 January 2016 17: 51
      +8
      In any case, the Serbs did not fight against us, unlike the same Bulgarians.
  5. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 12 January 2016 17: 45
    +5
    Not only Serbia, but also any other country.

    CSTO, after all, is not a piece of paper. It is doubtful that the United States will risk democratizing a member of the CSTO.

    And Yugoslavia, I remember, at one time asked to join the Union State. And the decision of the Duma, I remember, was about this. Why is there no Yugoslavia? And, I remembered, because the state criminal did not comply with the decision of the State Duma.
  6. cniza
    cniza 12 January 2016 17: 47
    +6
    When Sputnik asked if Serbia could count on Russia’s help in the event of a possible repeat of the 1999 scenario of the year when Yugoslavia (later split into Serbia and Montenegro) was bombed by NATO, the Russian deputy prime minister replied: “Having a strong military power - an ally of Serbia reassure any aggressor. "


    And where did the rest of the republic go?
    1. KBR109
      KBR109 12 January 2016 18: 18
      +3
      With tongue removed. Stunning illiteracy of journalists and not the first time. Six union republics and two autonomous territories.
      1. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 12 January 2016 21: 39
        0
        Everything is correct. In the SFRY (the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which until the beginning of the 60s was called the FPRY, there were 6 republics. And two autonomous regions, which were simultaneously subjects of the SFRY and parts of Serbia. In 1992, after the collapse of the SFRY , the FRY was formed - the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia as part of Serbia and Montenegro. It was sometimes unofficially called Little Yugoslavia or (ironically) “Serbia.” The autonomous regions of Serbia were no longer subjects of the federation, they were only autonomous parts of Serbia. the confederate State Commonwealth of Serbia and Montenegro, which soon ceased to exist.By the way, the other 4 republics argued that the FRY had no right to call itself Yugoslavia.
    2. Your friend
      Your friend 12 January 2016 18: 27
      0
      Quote: cniza
      When Sputnik asked if Serbia could count on Russia’s help in the event of a possible repeat of the 1999 scenario of the year when Yugoslavia (later split into Serbia and Montenegro) was bombed by NATO, the Russian deputy prime minister replied: “Having a strong military power - an ally of Serbia reassure any aggressor. "


      And where did the rest of the republic go?

      Yugoslavia disintegrated twice. In 1990 and in 2003 ..
      1. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 12 January 2016 21: 44
        0
        The first time in 1941, it was recreated in 1944-1945, the second time it actually broke up in 1990-1991, formally in 1992. And at the beginning of the XNUMXs, Little Yugoslavia split from two republics, which was first called the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and then the State Commonwealth of Serbia and Montenegro.
    3. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 12 January 2016 21: 31
      0
      They are now independent states.
  7. Wiruz
    Wiruz 12 January 2016 17: 51
    +2
    Hmm, but it would have been much easier if Serbia had access to the sea ...
  8. AleBors
    AleBors 12 January 2016 17: 55
    +3
    Yeah .. Any ally, such is as long as it is beneficial to him. The only thing I want to hope for is that the Serbs are brothers of faith to us .. It's still a transpersonal relationship ..
    1. satelit24
      satelit24 12 January 2016 18: 18
      0
      They are actually blood brothers! And, in religion, all power is from God! Therefore, many priests under the Germans (at one time) left! Partisans hunted for such then to pay off in full!
      1. WINovikov
        WINovikov 12 January 2016 19: 39
        -3
        And Joseph Broz Tito gave out the location of the partisan detachments. Read Shmakov "The Conspirators".
        1. Siberian
          Siberian 12 January 2016 21: 04
          +3
          And Joseph Broz Tito was not a Serb (he is a Croat). And Yugoslavia (the state) was the most independent from the USSR, and did not obey Stalin, and at that time we did not clutter (Yugoslavia - the USSR). And Kosovo became Albanian for a reason, and did not want to host a NATO base.
          And for that matter, we threw Tajiks with the collapse of the union and Ossetians, you know a lot about the wars that they had immediately. But we all only knew about the Chechen wars. Meanwhile, planes with refugees (in slippers and dressing gowns) arrived in our cities, planes with some children, whom their parents sent to nowhere (not to relatives and friends), but simply thrust them into the plane and they flew where they would fly, and there- as you have to. In the early 90s, Ossetians didn’t want to go into their compartment in their fast train, his neighbors were Georgians (I can’t, I say, forgive, we had a war, they killed my brother), we looked at him: raving, what kind of war? For us, it ended in 1945. They left the Kyrgyzs (quite, not at all belligerent), between them with the Uzbeks, feuds over water came, and much more.
          Errors must be corrected. Yes, loyalty is bought, won and the world hasn’t invented anything else. It has always been so, and it will be so.
          And about the money ... Psychologists say: what you have taken, mentally say goodbye to this. Give - well, do not give (which is also possible) - also not a tragedy. Just as with the release of hostages - they are considered dead a priori. Money too. They will take our weapons - they will ensure our presence at our place (maintenance, updating, technical support, training), and, in the end, any manufacturer and seller is wasted on advertising events.
        2. Ganssh
          Ganssh 12 January 2016 21: 07
          0
          "do not read the Soviet press in the morning"
          and also "there is no truth in the news, but there is no news in the truth"
          minus for just believing paper.
      2. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 12 January 2016 22: 13
        0
        Well, by blood, we are Croats and Slovenes, and Bosnian brothers.
  9. Ivan Ivanovich
    Ivan Ivanovich 12 January 2016 17: 56
    +2
    "This (weapon) is for Serbia, it is not against someone," he added. Good phrase ...
  10. WE ARE MAKING
    WE ARE MAKING 12 January 2016 17: 56
    +2
    The presence of a brain in the leadership of Serbia can determine the presence of a strong ally in it.
  11. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 12 January 2016 17: 58
    0
    A strong military ally will protect Serbia and prevent the repetition of the 1999 scenario, RIA Novosti reports a statement by Dmitry Rogozin, who came to Belgrade to participate in the Russian-Serbian committee ECONOMIC cooperation.

    Yes, this clown only needs to be used. Arrive, drive the wave out of the blue. It seems that he didn’t threaten anyone and did not promise anything, but the devil will hurt him, which may follow his words! A kind of starter balloons. Young Zhirik.
    .
  12. Konstantin 121
    Konstantin 121 12 January 2016 18: 07
    +2
    "No. This (weapon) is for Serbia, it is not against anyone, ”he added.


    Yeah, just like the NATO missile defense. Rogozin is making fun again.
  13. Signaller
    Signaller 12 January 2016 18: 11
    0
    Gavrilo Principle probably turned over in his coffin from such words. Personal opinion. I do not impose.
  14. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 12 January 2016 18: 11
    +3
    Unfortunately, as practice shows, most countries for some reason think that if they yap on the orders of the United States, they will immediately begin to live as happily as the Americans. This will not happen, even in theory; nobody will share their benefits.

    But even the minority of countries that prefer a reliable ally (as a guarantor against democratization) to the false promises of the Western leaders who are lying around, in various vile ways (bribery and intimidation) find themselves under the rule of people who do not meet the aspirations of the population (that is, illegitimate). An example of this is the history of Montenegro. It would seem that if everything is there for NATO, hold a referendum. They don’t want where I come to the logical conclusion that the population is just against NATO and Dzhukanovich - a liar, a thief and an autocrat, such as Pol Pot.

    Little of! Even those countries that seem to establish normal relations with Russia (not relations of satrap and vassal, but relations of equal parties) suddenly find themselves forcibly democratized, and again all sorts of sadists come to the leadership. An example is Bulgaria. All South Stream construction permits have been issued. Where is it conceivable that the issued permit be canceled? Is this such a tradition of the rule of law ?.

    In place of Bulgaria, Hungary, Montenegro, Greece, I would personally say this - at first like you, the vile bourgeoisie, stop eating grouse, and raise our economy up your level, and then I will execute the decisions of all European Commissioners. And so that there is no blasphemous desire to democratize and homosexualize by force, enter into a military alliance with Russia. There is no point in the EU if some people dig pineapples, while others work for the former as sewers. If some build hydroturbines, while others even close the last bicycle factories. Something like this.
  15. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 12 January 2016 18: 16
    +6
    In ancient Rome, the word "ally" meant a controlled territory, which is ordered - then you will do. I don’t think that we need friends, partners, allies and other brothers. If you want a weapon, give me money or political gain. If you want protection, it's the same. Any our gesture of goodwill is perceived by EVERYONE without exception as weakness. Zadolbali it already.
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 12 January 2016 22: 15
      0
      In ancient Rome, the "allies" had a very high status and had real autonomy.
  16. vobels
    vobels 12 January 2016 18: 19
    +4
    We must wait for what the Serbs themselves say, and not just Rogozin.
  17. raid14
    raid14 12 January 2016 18: 20
    +1
    When did the presence of an ally or allies stop the US and NATO?
    The world has changed, Russia is different, it is clear that it is different, it was only too late to understand when NATO actually stopped at our gates.
    When we talk with the United States on equal terms, only then we can make such promises, otherwise it’s a cheap show-off which is more expensive than the American dollar.
  18. SMICKER
    SMICKER 12 January 2016 18: 28
    +3
    Helping an ally is necessary - this is a matter of honor if we have declared the right-wing movement to unite around Russia. Everything in the world is mutual, and if this is not done, we will remain at the trough! It is important to understand how and how we can help? Time will tell.
  19. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 12 January 2016 18: 58
    +1
    But what about their plans to join the EU and NATO? After all, both the EU and NATO at the "request" of the Serbian "people" can speed up this process.
  20. salad
    salad 12 January 2016 19: 17
    +2
    Serbs are brothers and they need help! at least they don’t scream as an enemy !!
  21. salad
    salad 12 January 2016 19: 18
    +2
    Serbs are brothers and they need help! they at least as PUKRy do not yell that the Russian enemy !!
    1. RUSS
      RUSS 12 January 2016 21: 12
      +2
      Quote: salat
      Serbs are brothers and they need help!

      I figured that the Serbs from European nations are, in my opinion, those who have never attached us or fought with us.
  22. WINovikov
    WINovikov 12 January 2016 19: 21
    +1
    Not in the subject, but ... LADY would do well to lose weight! It looks strange against the background of the crisis in Russia.
    1. Siberian
      Siberian 12 January 2016 21: 07
      +2
      To be completely honest, I haven’t noticed a single person who has lost weight during the crisis. So DAM keeps up with the country
    2. gergi
      gergi 12 January 2016 23: 23
      0
      Do not he lose weight, let him rushing. That heights, that the shyrta is beautiful. The truth, may burst, well, we’ll grieve, but what would happen without it.
  23. Massik
    Massik 12 January 2016 21: 20
    0
    Yugoslavia also had a strong ally, but that did not help her ...
  24. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 12 January 2016 21: 40
    +1
    Serbs, you still can’t sit on two chairs and you have to make a choice: either on parcels in the EU, or Serbian Autonomy as part of Russia. In the second case, much will have to be decided together, but not a single western dog will even dare to bark in your direction.
    And then the Bulgarians squirmed ... In short, choose.
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 12 January 2016 22: 20
      0
      They have their own state, why should they be autonomous? Neither the Russian Federation nor Serbia needs this. By the way, there are five autonomies left in the Russian Federation: four districts of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, ChAO and one oblast, the Autonomous Okrug. Only the Chukotka District and the Jewish Region are directly included in the federation. Nenets Autonomous Okrug through Arkhangelsk, and Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug through Tyumen Oblast. The republics have not been autonomies for a long time.
      1. Ajent cho
        Ajent cho 13 January 2016 00: 18
        0
        They have their own state, why should they be autonomous?
        I said above why. They do not even have access to the sea - they will devour it. But if management is from the outside - the chances of survival and preservation of identity increase.
        However, this is only my opinion and my own view from the outside.
        Again, do not forget how in the West they relate to Orthodoxy ...
  25. gergi
    gergi 12 January 2016 23: 20
    +1
    My personal opinion. Brothers constantly pound, and Russia does not ask permission, but when they begin to tamper with them, we must pull them out of the ram and wash them with our blood. Enough already, you need to appreciate your blood.
  26. tehnokrat
    tehnokrat 12 January 2016 23: 57
    +1
    And what, in fact, of this - to sell the S-300 to the Serbs?
    The Croats sold their S-300s off, they set something else for themselves, and the Serbs, what is worse?
    Of all the fragments of Yugoslavia, Serbia is nevertheless closer to us. Maybe people will not allow it before joining NATO! A year before the election.
    Or so: "nothing personal, only business!"
    Although the word "Serbia" is warming somehow for the soul ...
  27. liza1999
    liza1999 13 January 2016 01: 20
    -2
    Someone here wrote about the Serbs as about brothers nev ... s, who never, but never ... Only unbearable mutual love to the grave ... Do you even discover the Internet and read about the Serbian SS brigades. At the same time, you will learn a lot about the "brothers". They even now see themselves in their heads in the EU. Remove the blinders from their eyes. They found the brothers ...
  28. iouris
    iouris 13 January 2016 01: 47
    +1
    First, a government controlled by Moscow would have to be brought to power in Belgrade.