Military Review

NATO: Moscow is mistaken about alliance promises

81
Statements that NATO promised Russia not to expand to the East "do not correspond to reality", therefore, there are no contradictions in strengthening the alliance, Deputy Organization Secretary General Alexander Vershbow wrote on his Twitter account on Monday.




“Russia says that NATO promised not to expand. But this is simply not true. Every nation has the right to choose its alliances. Open Doors = historical success, ”Vershbow quotes RIA News.

He also noted that Moscow mistakenly perceives the alliance as a threat. “NATO’s missile defense is not directed against Russia, and they know it. This is a growing missile threat outside Europe. ”

NATO representative Oana Lungescu wrote something similar on the social network. "Geography and nuclear physics weapons make the threats of Russia from the alliance impossible, ”she believes.

Earlier, Sergey Lavrov reminded that the alliance, indeed, did not take "legal obligations not to expand to the East", but gave Moscow such promises orally. Nevertheless, "NATO was not just saved, but began to move to the East," he said.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
81 comment
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. yurii p
    yurii p 12 January 2016 08: 37 New
    20
    the country of LIES and genocide confirms its policy, FALSE is the basis of the life of Tan.
    1. Dembel77
      Dembel77 12 January 2016 08: 42 New
      22
      “Russia says that NATO promised not to expand. But this is simply not true.
      Yeah! It is interesting! Well, let Gorbachev come here quickly, let him repeat - how it was. He will not let lie. Or give ...?
      1. Temples
        Temples 12 January 2016 08: 53 New
        13
        “The geography and physics of nuclear weapons makes the alliance’s threats to Russia impossible,” she said.

        Darling Ohana forgot to add that both Chemistry and Fizra and the Singing of nuclear weapons do not pose a threat either. But Labor, Literature and History refrain from commenting. wassat
        1. Kostyar
          Kostyar 12 January 2016 10: 03 New
          +7
          Russia says NATO promised not to expand.

          Just do not make a sucker from Russia! Like, well, you’ve promised ..... .....! The playwrights are gayrope !!! It is about the fact that there were verbal agreements between the leaders of that time !!!
          And your holey position is clear, take your word for homosexuals - do not respect yourself, blame yourself, if that ..... !!!!!
        2. Skif83
          Skif83 12 January 2016 13: 51 New
          0
          ... the threat of Russia from the alliance is impossible
          doing standing on b / d / "Satan", and her modern relatives.
          Well, to some extent, because of their location, this is geography, but what does physics have to do with it ...
          Maybe amery something new in nuclear physics nadybal ...?
      2. Al_oriso
        Al_oriso 12 January 2016 09: 06 New
        17
        Earlier, Sergey Lavrov reminded that the alliance did not take “legal obligations will not expand to the East”, but made such promises to Moscow verbally. Nevertheless, “NATO was not just preserved, but began to move to the East”

        Russia also did not promise anyone that it would not expand to the west ...
        1. krot
          krot 12 January 2016 09: 41 New
          +4
          is it like this, "The geography and physics of nuclear weapons makes the threat of Russia from the alliance impossible" ??? Nonsense is complete! Armed to crush us, albeit not by war but psychologically! But it was not there...)
          1. arane
            arane 12 January 2016 10: 08 New
            +2
            Quote: krot
            is it like this, "The geography and physics of nuclear weapons makes the threat of Russia from the alliance impossible" ??? Nonsense is complete! Armed to crush us, albeit not by war but psychologically! But it was not there...)


            Did she herself understand what she said? This is something new in geography and physics!
            1. 72jora72
              72jora72 12 January 2016 12: 56 New
              0
              Did she herself understand what she said? This is something new in geography and physics!
              New science --- nuclear geography belay
        2. Diana Ilyina
          Diana Ilyina 12 January 2016 10: 47 New
          +9
          Quote: Al_oriso
          Russia also did not promise anyone that it would not expand to the west ...


          This is true! Crimea - Russia, Alaska - Russia, ALL Russia, except Kosovo, Kosovo - Serbia! Although why do we need Finns, Poles, Balts and Bandera ?! To put parasites on your neck again ?! I propose to limit ourselves to New Russia, Alaska, well, you can grab California!
          1. Red_Hamer
            Red_Hamer 12 January 2016 12: 08 New
            0
            Serbs themselves are called Russian))
          2. edge
            edge 12 January 2016 12: 19 New
            0
            Quote: Diana Ilyina
            I propose to limit ourselves to New Russia, Alaska, well, you can grab California!

            and if Ireland is accepted into the community, finally, it will be gorgeous (all British queens will rotate in the crypts of the boulder)
      3. andre
        andre 12 January 2016 09: 11 New
        0
        That's right, promise to marry, this does not mean to marry !!!
      4. vlad66
        vlad66 12 January 2016 09: 15 New
        41
        Quote: Dembel 77
        Yeah! It is interesting! Well, let Gorbachev come here quickly, let him repeat - how it was. He will not let lie. Or give ...?

        He will say, "The process has begun, restructuring new thinking"
        1. Platonich
          Platonich 12 January 2016 09: 32 New
          11
          Dumbhead, seized power and buried all the achievements of the Soviet people,.
          1. edge
            edge 12 January 2016 12: 21 New
            +1
            Quote: Platonitch
            Dumbhead, seized power and buried all the achievements of the Soviet people,.

            he didn’t break, and he was gradually led to the desired result using all means of influence. In short, this bird of their flight
        2. Mikhail Krapivin
          Mikhail Krapivin 12 January 2016 11: 49 New
          +3
          Quote: vlad66
          Quote: Dembel 77
          Yeah! It is interesting! Well, let Gorbachev come here quickly, let him repeat - how it was. He will not let lie. Or give ...?

          He will say, "The process has begun, restructuring new thinking"


          Here explain to me how, knowing the proverb “God marks the huck” it was possible to put this marked one at the head of such a country?
          1. edge
            edge 12 January 2016 12: 27 New
            0
            Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
            knowing the proverb "God marks the huck" it was possible to put this marked at the head of such a country?

            By the time it began to be developed by the tsruushniki, he held some small position in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, he was noticed, calculated and led. The KGB had no right to interfere in the affairs of the Central Committee, and the echidna crawled out
        3. bort4145
          bort4145 12 January 2016 12: 17 New
          0
          Duc Gorbachev still that "will give" winked
      5. Sober
        Sober 12 January 2016 09: 21 New
        +3
        Quote: Dembel 77
        He will not let lie. Or give ...?

        You see, the Shnobel laureate, after all!
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. Aleksander
        Aleksander 12 January 2016 09: 53 New
        +1
        Quote: Dembel 77
        Yeah! It is interesting! Well, let Gorbachev come here quickly, let him repeat - how it was. He will not let lie. Or give ...?


        What can this loshara say? How was he thrown as the last dbl?
      8. Pete mitchell
        Pete mitchell 12 January 2016 12: 01 New
        +9
        Labeled as then he believed in everything, and now he will “bend”, he needs to live somewhere, but in Germany it’s more comfortable than in a country that was frankly taken away
        1. edge
          edge 12 January 2016 12: 33 New
          0
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          Labeled as then he believed in everything, and now he will “bend”, he needs to live somewhere, but in Germany it’s more comfortable than in a country that was frankly taken away

          they didn’t take him away, he handed us over: in vain was he lost in Reykjavik for a day, so that the FSO could not find
      9. edge
        edge 12 January 2016 12: 13 New
        +1
        Quote: Dembel 77
        Well, let Gorbachev come here quickly, let him repeat - how it was. He will not let lie. Or give ...?

        yeah, and where then and what will it exist for? This blotter in its place, or rather in the urn.
      10. The comment was deleted.
    2. cniza
      cniza 12 January 2016 08: 43 New
      +7
      What is the word of a gentleman they do not know and for them the concept of honor is not known.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 12 January 2016 09: 16 New
        +4
        What kind of "honor" is it ?! The pirate genes of the Anglo-Saxon colonialists have been making themselves felt in the blood of Americans for several centuries! Where did you see honest pirates?
        1. Azitral
          Azitral 12 January 2016 10: 09 New
          +4
          Merry Milkman - seen, Funny Ovaries - seen, wolves - vegetarians - seen. Honest Anglo-Saxons - no, I do not remember. Well, they don’t even hide that they will betray, sell, throw right away, as soon as it becomes even a little profitable ("there are no eternal allies, there are only eternal interests ...") - and all the same, there are always pink idealists who recklessly trust them again and again - I am mainly about the Poles. But about Gorbachev too.
        2. Pete mitchell
          Pete mitchell 12 January 2016 12: 15 New
          +8
          But what about Captain Blood? Sorry, he's a fictional character. Yes, the real characters of Anglo-Saxon politics never bother to abide by agreements, written or especially oral. We are looking for a ton of examples in history, especially in recent history: Ukraine before and after the coup, Syria, Libya Gaddafi ... Emperor Alexander III named allies of Russia and God’s forgiveness for partners, forgive me, president of the Taft dollar in 1910. How could everything be so simple, and let’s “breed” the collective farmer Gorbachev ...
          1. Sergelis
            Sergelis 12 January 2016 13: 22 New
            +1
            So Captain Blood was Irish
          2. Weyland
            Weyland 12 January 2016 21: 48 New
            0
            Quote: Pete Mitchell
            But what about Captain Blood? Sorry, he's a fictional character.


            - English dog!
            “Irish, for your information!” (from)

            I immediately recall the series “Captain Blood’s Good Luck”, the story “Blasphemy” - how Blood famously breds the Spanish Jew for the fact that he “threw” such a very positive and honest english slave trader ...
          3. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 12 January 2016 08: 47 New
      +2
      The fact that an agreement was not signed with the United States on the non-expansion of NATO to the east lies entirely with Gorbachev. And it convinces me more and more that he did it on purpose, and not in a fit of friendship. You do not have to be seven spans in your forehead to guess that the United States will not stop there. I can not imagine the same behavior of the current President Putin. As they say: feel the difference!
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 12 January 2016 08: 53 New
      0
      Quote: yurii p
      the country of LIES and genocide confirms its policy, FALSE is the basis of the life of Tan.

      Is this what comment is about ?? What are you doing? repeat
      To a troll who accidentally came in and didn’t even read what was written at all ???
    7. Pig
      Pig 12 January 2016 08: 58 New
      +4
      well, this is thanks to Gorbatom and Shvondernadze who "took the word" and surrendered unilaterally ...
      and now you won’t prove anything ... however, one fact can be proved with 100% probability:
      M.S. Gorbachev - traitor and agent of influence!
      those. The USSR didn’t fall apart “by itself” but was destroyed by a bunch of pro-American traitors in the top leadership
      1. BDRM 667
        BDRM 667 12 January 2016 09: 13 New
        +1
        Quote: Pig
        and now you won’t prove anything ... however, one fact can be proved with 100% probability:
        M.S. Gorbachev - traitor and agent of influence!


        Actually, only Hunchback will correct the grave.

        You only by your comment, in other words, expressed the attitude of the overwhelming number of ex-USSR citizens to this “figure”.

        Well, about the "evidence" ...

        It seems to me that with the strengthening of Russia, there is no longer any need for it to prove or justify anything. Other times have come. It became clear, first of all to ourselves, that they believe not in words, but in actions ...

        And for Action, has already dry powder in the flocks.
      2. Azitral
        Azitral 12 January 2016 10: 23 New
        0
        Everything is more complicated. Why did we find a sufficient number of traitors, but they do not? This, you know, is not only the reason for the weakness of the system, but also its sign. Adherents betray those who are considered the weakest, least promising. The USSR has always been a weakness and in the new Russia is a miserable, practically absent system of elite formation capable of promoting the most efficient and honest. No - a mechanism capable of:
        a) the bulk of entrepreneurs act in the interests of the country
        b) select officials according to their business qualities, not personal loyalty.
        blaming failures and catastrophes on “traitors” is the last thing, you can do this constantly, without trying to come up with anything.
    8. Bazilevs81
      Bazilevs81 12 January 2016 08: 58 New
      +1
      Maybe he really believes what he says)))))
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 12 January 2016 10: 50 New
        +2
        Quote: Bazilevs81
        Maybe he really believes what he says)))

        Believe that he believes, but does not think)))
        His phrase is "" "“Russia says that NATO promised not to expand. But this is simply not true. Every nation has the right to choose its alliances. Open Doors = Historical Success ”- Now it should be interpreted as the fact that the people of Crimea, using their historical right, have chosen an alliance with Russia !!!
        Cancel the sanctions "gentlemen" !!!!!)))))
    9. Finches
      Finches 12 January 2016 09: 03 New
      +8
      Europe repents and admits its mistakes only when the Russian army enters Paris or hangs a flag over the Reichstag ... In all other cases, Europe is always supposedly right ... laughing
    10. go21zd45few
      go21zd45few 12 January 2016 09: 20 New
      +3
      Mr. Vershbow, if my memory serves me right, then the NATO bloc was created in opposition to the USSR, which led to the creation of the Warsaw bloc as a response to the NATO bloc.
      In 1991, the USSR collapsed and the Warsaw block self-destructed. The threat to the west has disappeared, so why did the NATO bloc begin to expand east without a real threat from the east. By your actions you provoked the response of RUSSIA to strengthen its armed forces. If you forgot the story, then I remind you that Hitler also had a bloc against Russia, capturing all of western Europe and part of the Middle East, and where is it now? Who comes to us with a sword from the sword and dies. {Alexander Nevsky} You need to be friends with RUSSIA and not fight, you’ll break your teeth.
    11. Proxima
      Proxima 12 January 2016 09: 20 New
      -1
      Quote: yurii p
      the country of LIES and genocide confirms its policy, FALSE is the basis of the life of Tan.

      As already got these double standards. Then let them spread nuclear weapons. It’s “after all, the right of every state to choose which weapon it has.” Cheap demagogy for the naive.
      1. Azitral
        Azitral 12 January 2016 10: 28 New
        +1
        One of the options for some penultimate case: a promise to withdraw from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. As an exception, it is understandable (as with Kosovo) and with the goal of preserving Democracy somewhere in Egypt. Or Brazil. Or in Cuba.
  2. valday
    valday 12 January 2016 08: 39 New
    +4
    The honest word of the West is an empty phrase and is worth nothing.
    I hope that the current and subsequent rulers of Russia have the brains to never again take the word of the West.
  3. Woodman
    Woodman 12 January 2016 08: 39 New
    +9
    In relations with NATO, Moscow is mistaken in two cases: when NATO believes in the word and when it believes in the agreements signed with NATO.
    1. go21zd45few
      go21zd45few 12 January 2016 09: 26 New
      0
      Moscow is mistaken in all cases, the West cannot be trusted given the fact that it does not pursue an independent policy, but acts at the direction of Washington.
      All Western policies are based on lies and hypocrisy.
  4. SAM 5
    SAM 5 12 January 2016 08: 39 New
    +6
    However, the same trait (Vershbow) not so long ago stated: "Russia's policy forces the alliance to begin to consider the country not as a partner, but as an adversary" (literally)
  5. rafaelich
    rafaelich 12 January 2016 08: 40 New
    +1
    Open secret!..
  6. Same lech
    Same lech 12 January 2016 08: 41 New
    +2
    NATO: Moscow is mistaken about alliance promises


    Here's to you .... what
    So, following the similar logic of the promise of NATO and the USA, a mistake for MOSCOW too ...

    you are there in WASHINGTON with the logic of lies that you decide, or you contradict yourself ...

    once lied no longer trust .. so to you.
  7. A-Sim
    A-Sim 12 January 2016 08: 42 New
    +4
    "... all your contracts will not be worth the paper on which they are written ..."

    What to speak of "promises"?
  8. inkass_98
    inkass_98 12 January 2016 08: 42 New
    0
    What else can these gentlemen say? Only what they have been saying for more than 25 years is that they are white and fluffy, and Russia is Mordor and the reviving evil empire. Nothing new, and the bases around Russia are aimed exclusively at protecting it from aliens.
  9. nikolaij.w.78
    nikolaij.w.78 12 January 2016 08: 42 New
    +1
    These missile defense systems are being set up against an imaginary enemy, but for some reason around Russia. But they are now the first goals, the first frontier. soldier
  10. Flinky
    Flinky 12 January 2016 08: 43 New
    +4
    They have long been confused in the testimony.
  11. ded100
    ded100 12 January 2016 08: 43 New
    +2
    They’re all so white and fluffy, well, what to perceive as a threat !! Well, you do not be afraid of us, otherwise the plane flew over and the hysterics of the ship swam panic !! laughing
  12. brasist
    brasist 12 January 2016 08: 44 New
    0
    pee-pee-pee-pee-pee .... at the same time make serious faces and in fact go out stupid rye.
  13. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 January 2016 08: 51 New
    0
    NATO promised Russia not to expand to the East “not true”

    Here it is the essence of the snickering and lost sense of proportion of the West. Not when they will not go to normal relations with Russia. Therefore, as we lived surrounded by enemies, so we will live. We are not used to it, but the West just needs to understand that without cooperation with Russia they are a corpse.
  14. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 12 January 2016 08: 51 New
    0
    So it can tell us, they didn’t understand us, did we leave eastern Europe at that time? Lavrov-DB quotation again begs itself, but shh, it’s not possible here. The highly intellectual faces of NATO officials are especially touching.
  15. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 12 January 2016 08: 52 New
    +1
    It’s even better: “The knife in our hand is not a threat to you personally, but only an answer to a possible threat from your neighbors!”
    Verbiage fucking!
    Are they holding us for idiots?!?
    Ha ha ha !!!
    Three times!
  16. fzr1000
    fzr1000 12 January 2016 08: 54 New
    0
    I look at it all and think, why is this world so arranged now? Lying is worthless. To the whole Planet. And so every day. And then these Vershbow will go home, have dinner with their family, and kiss the children for the night. And they all seem to be decent. Himself in front of themselves, when they are sitting in the toilet alone, is not it a shame? Whom will they bring up? Why do they smoke our world? Also, you just need to sterilize so that this rubbish does not multiply. In our country, too, this "good" is.
    Evil and ammo are not enough for this mold.
  17. ratfly
    ratfly 12 January 2016 08: 55 New
    0
    The NATO officials immediately began to croak, they sensed that the feeding trough could be pushed back. They will tell the truth after the resignation, as is now customary in Europe.
  18. vmo
    vmo 12 January 2016 08: 55 New
    -1
    The country of LIES and genocide confirms its policy, FALSE is the basis of life of the country.

    Well, howl about Crimea? stop
  19. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 January 2016 08: 56 New
    +3
    NATO is such a "garage cooperative assembly" that legitimizes the presence of the occupying forces of the striped-eared hegemon. And it doesn’t matter absolutely what someone told and promised to anyone. "You are only to blame for what I want to eat!" What does some international law have to do with it? Striped ears speak very specifically - we have our own interests. They apply to THE WHOLE WORLD. And those who disagree can - either keep quiet in a rag, or howl from hopelessness - we will do what we consider necessary. And why are we surprised by attempts to “crush” Russia on all fronts? Russia is the only country in the world that can really repel the hegemony of mattress. Just because I managed not to surrender nuclear weapons in exchange for something "sweet".
    And it does not matter what the level of well-being of the people of Russia is. Now they will play this, trying to "knock out a chair from under Russia." But it seems to me that the second mistake will not be allowed for the stripe ears. They did not finish Russia during the EBN, they simply decided that already everything was already there! Economical. There will be no more options. If we will, they will dismember and, if possible, even ignite the Civil War, so that it does not rise anymore. And what happened in 1917, why it should not work out in 2017?
  20. Lawrence
    Lawrence 12 January 2016 08: 57 New
    0
    If NATO is a peace-loving organization, then why is it fighting around the world, fomenting war, creeping into the internal affairs of other states, overthrowing or trying to overthrow legitimate governments?
  21. amt2011
    amt2011 12 January 2016 08: 58 New
    -4
    what do they want let them do soldier
  22. tolian
    tolian 12 January 2016 09: 07 New
    0
    Soon we will become richer (everything goes to this, as it seems strange to someone) and in Latin America, in Alaska, we will create a missile defense belt against possible drug smuggling to Russia. There are enough countries willing to contribute to this. And the gentlemen themselves will not, I suppose, be against it.
  23. Colleague
    Colleague 12 January 2016 09: 13 New
    0
    To take them by the testicles and crush with pleasure - long and tedious.
  24. electrooleg
    electrooleg 12 January 2016 09: 14 New
    -1
    All right, this dude writes on Twitter. They want to get on the neck - this is forbidden to anyone. laughing
  25. An64
    An64 12 January 2016 09: 21 New
    +4
    I don’t understand our hysteria: "NATO is expanding, NATO is expanding ..." Yes, it is expanding. And expanding due to our former allies and friends. Can still look at yourself? Why did all the “friends” suddenly run out of the Warsaw Pact, from the Union? Or maybe they were never friends? Then why tear about this? In the same way, we convince others that sanctions themselves are harmful. Go explain to the neighbor that the tall fence he built covers the sun on his site, does he listen?
    That we look into everyone’s mouth and want everyone to be friends with us. In the end, one must realize one's self-sufficiency and one's significance. Your abilities and your abilities. You have to become yourself !!!
  26. sl22277
    sl22277 12 January 2016 09: 32 New
    +2
    All that Vershbow says is just a thrill designed for the Evrokhov. And in reality: NATO is working out real-life scenarios of waging war with Russia using American tactical nuclear weapons. We do not do this. Therefore, it is absolutely clear who is the aggressor and who is not. In addition, it is NATO that is deploying missile defense systems near Russia. Moscow is forced to respond to this. But NATO’s military infrastructure is approaching our borders, and not vice versa. As for NATO military exercises, they are offensive. An analysis of military plans and exercises shows that the NATO leadership plans and works out a war against Russia. These plans include the occupation of Kaliningrad, the destruction of the Black Sea Fleet, and the use of US tactical nuclear weapons for key purposes in Russia. ”
    Russia is not preparing for war with NATO, because all the exercises conducted by the Ministry of Defense are purely defensive in nature.
  27. Yak-3P
    Yak-3P 12 January 2016 09: 33 New
    +1
    Children of all radishes for the mutt keep chtol !!
  28. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 12 January 2016 09: 35 New
    +2
    Regarding the promises of NATO, only Tagged experienced illusions, normal people never believed their promises.
  29. Dam
    Dam 12 January 2016 09: 39 New
    +2
    Only the nuclear shield of the motherland makes these freaks bark from afar, and not attack
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. Altona
    Altona 12 January 2016 09: 57 New
    0
    ... you cannot negotiate with the West. On no matter. He can only agree with your demand, backed up by force and an unacceptable threat to him. Everything else is grinded and chewed - when quickly, when not very ...

    ----------------------------
    Words are not mine, quoted. Most likely the philosopher Ivan Ilyin.
  32. Viktor fm
    Viktor fm 12 January 2016 09: 57 New
    0
    At the slightest danger from NATO for Russia, European countries with nuclear weapons should be erased from this long-suffering land
  33. Altona
    Altona 12 January 2016 10: 03 New
    0
    ... The main attitude of Europe towards Russia: Russia is a mysterious, semi-barbaric "emptiness"; it must be “evangelized” or converted to Catholicism; “Colonize” and civilize; if necessary, it can and should be used for its trade and for its Western European purposes; and in other matters it must be weakened in every way. How?

    Involving her at a disadvantageous moment in the wars that were devastating for her; if possible, then by dividing it into small states; if possible, then by reducing its population; if possible, by planting revolutions and civil wars in it; and then by introducing into Russia an international “behind the scenes”, stubbornly imposing on the Russian people unbearable West European forms of the republic, democracy and federalism, its political and diplomatic isolation, relentless denunciation of its alleged “imperialism”, its imaginary “reactionaryness”, its “uncivilized” and "aggressiveness."
    ------------------------
    Ivan Ilyin is a Russian philosopher.
  34. Aleksander
    Aleksander 12 January 2016 10: 03 New
    +1
    the alliance didn’t take “legal obligations will not expand to the East”

    Did Russia take legal obligations on abandonment of its zone of occupation of Germanythat she was entitled to under the Potsdam agreement? Let them show! But nothing, all in words. If we move to the legal basis, then let Germany prepare bases for Russian troops. By the same decisions, legally, Germany has no right to have either an army or a war industry — let it be liquidated immediately.
    Lawyers dblny, damn it.
  35. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 12 January 2016 10: 10 New
    0
    A Russian person will not calm down until he teaches a foreigner to swear in Russian, and Word does not emphasize obscene words.
  36. Dimontius
    Dimontius 12 January 2016 10: 35 New
    +1
    I honestly say that I really want to bomb nuclear weapons against these tolerant, dumbhead freaks. so much so that they consider themselves to be the “pinnacle” of morality and democracy, that they not only make me sick, but turn me out of anger when I read such “sayings” of the European bureaucrats. So I want to ask, "Hey, ghoul, are you anyway who that is ??????????" and "Did you learn history at all, undergrowth?" am angry
  37. vobels
    vobels 12 January 2016 10: 49 New
    0
    ".. NATO's missile defense is not directed against Russia, .." Well, probably against Mongolia? The stars did not have an honest word or honor, and did not and never will be.
  38. Mercenary
    Mercenary 12 January 2016 11: 22 New
    0
    "NATO's missile defense is not directed against Russia, and they know it. It is a growing missile threat outside of Europe. ”
    Vershbow is on a protoponious road - if you say 300 times FALSE does it become true?
  39. Dimka999
    Dimka999 12 January 2016 11: 30 New
    0
    Just . I didn’t learn anything new for myself ....
  40. Lelek
    Lelek 12 January 2016 11: 40 New
    0
    “NATO’s missile defense is not directed against Russia, and they know it. It is a growing missile threat outside of Europe. ”

    Well, yes, tension is growing in Malaysia and Indonesia, so NATO is building up its structures in Poland and LaLes. Very logical and, most importantly, convincing. Tell this to your granddaughter, sir, she might be able to believe it. stop
  41. iouris
    iouris 12 January 2016 11: 55 New
    0
    In practical terms, “NATO expansion to the East” should be understood as taking control of the USSR’s raw materials under full control. Politically, there is an “igilization" of the commodity countries, i.e. the destruction of the sovereignty of states and depriving the population of bonuses from the sale of raw materials to the West.
  42. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 12 January 2016 12: 31 New
    0
    “Russia says that NATO promised not to expand. But this is simply not true .... - RIA Novosti quoted Vershbow as saying.

    The FASHINGTON SCAMS knew that the promises given to a fool who, by the will of fate, had appeared at the top of power and imagined himself a great politician, were NOT MANDATORY! Who then will seriously take the lamentations of this semi-literate labeled Judas, who has ruined a huge country, who can’t say two Russian words competently, so as not to be an object of ridicule!
  43. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 12 January 2016 12: 41 New
    0
    “... NATO spokesman Oana Lungescu:“ The geography and physics of nuclear weapons make the alliance’s threats to Russia impossible ”is utter nonsense.

    And yet ... At this stage of the West-USSR / Russia relationship, our leaders believed the oral promises of the West "not to expand east." They believed that they were dealing with gentlemen, but in fact, these "gentlemen" were, to put it mildly, deceivers.
  44. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 12 January 2016 13: 56 New
    0
    If NATO considers itself the most powerful military organization, then why should they expand?

    And why is expansion, in a strange way, not going towards Africa, but going towards Russia? And why are missile defense facilities being built on the border with Russia? Why not on the trajectory of mythical North Korean missiles? How will Euro missile defense protect the US from the terrible Kim Jong-un if its missiles fly over the Pacific Ocean? And Iran, if anything, will launch a missile strike against Israel; Does he want to sell gas to Europe, and not launch rockets? It can be seen that everything is sewn with white thread.

    And, most importantly, this specialist did not attend the 1990 negotiations; he has no right to judge what was promised and what was not.