Birthday with a bomb

67
Some people celebrate birthdays with a cake and candles, others - with a bomb and an explosion. Fortunately, the latter are in the minority. Unfortunately, these latter are politicians, confident that they are threatened by the whole world, and therefore it is necessary to stockpile thermonuclear bombs and blow them up, demonstrating their “power”. However, experts do not believe the North Korean "leader" who allegedly tested the hydrogen bomb. Some analysts from neighboring South Korea believe that it was an explosion of a conventional nuclear bomb, arranged for the birthday of Kim Jong-un (January 8).



Recall that in the morning of January 6, North Korea announced the successful testing of a hydrogen bomb. (About this bomb, adopted by the armed forces of the DPRK, in December last year, Kim Jong-un himself reported.) In the same statement, Pyongyang noted that he would not use a nuclear weaponif the sovereignty of the state will not be violated.

"Today, the first test of hydrogen weapons was successfully conducted," the newspaper announces the North Korean television announcer "Sight". Possession of "hydrogen weapons has become historical event "for North Korea, North Korean TV reported.

Traditional accusations were made against Washington. “As long as the United States does not abandon the hostile policy, neither the cessation of nuclear development, nor the dismantling of nuclear facilities by the DPRK will ever be possible,” the statement said.

“The army and the people of the DPRK will firmly increase the just forces of nuclear deterrence, both in quality and quantity, in order to reliably guarantee the future of the revolutionary course of Juche for all ages,” the publication quotes the statement.

Kim Jong-un called the bomb test an act of self-defense against the threat of the United States, reports Gazeta.ru with links to Reuters and CTC.

“The DPRK hydrogen bomb test is an act of self-defense to confidently safeguard peace on the Korean Peninsula and regional security from the threat of atomic war created by US-led imperialists,” said Kim Jong-un.

According to the North Korean leader, such tests are the legal right of his state.

The international community of action of Pyongyang condemned.

An alarming event called the bomb test by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. The 15 countries of the UN Security Council condemned the tests and called them a threat to peace and security.

Security Council presidency diplomat Elbio Rosselli told reporters that the Security Council had already begun working on a resolution that would set forth response measures against the DPRK. The diplomat recalled that the tests are a violation of previously adopted resolutions that banned Pyongyang from any actions related to the development of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.

Probably, the new resolution will provide for the introduction of additional economic sanctions against Pyongyang.

The IAEA Director General, Yukiya Amano, called the test a violation of UN Security Council resolutions.

The head of EU diplomacy, Federica Mogherini, said that the EU will work with the United Nations on the issue of nuclear testing in North Korea.

The White House, too, was alarmed. Washington reported that they will monitor the situation on the Korean Peninsula.

However, many experts note that the explosion in the DPRK and seismic vibrations do not correspond to the power of a thermonuclear charge. The power of the explosion was about six kilotons in TNT equivalent. It is believed that the test resembles the result of an atomic bomb explosion, similar to the one that was held in January 2013. Thus, North Korea either suffered a fiasco with a hydrogen bomb, or engaged in propaganda, passing the test of a "normal" nuclear bomb for an explosion of hydrogen.

Experts are skeptical about Pyongyang’s claims to test the hydrogen bomb. However, final conclusions can be made in a few days, when experts analyze air samples and examine data on the nature of seismic activity at the test site. Even such an analysis does not guarantee on 100% the credibility of the conclusions about whether a tested bomb was hydrogen or conventional nuclear. This is evidenced by the Deputy Director of the Eastern Institute - School of Regional and International Studies of the Far Eastern Federal University, Associate Professor Artem Lukin, whose opinion leads the site RIA News".

The intelligence of South Korea, openly voiced in the country's parliament, the agency said, show that the power of the explosion was about six kilotons in TNT. And the lower limit of the power of thermonuclear charges is hundreds of kilotons.

According to the expert on nuclear energy, Alexander Uvarov, the low power of the explosion can be explained by the unsuccessful testing of the hydrogen bomb. According to Uvarov, it is more likely that Pyongyang has tested a conventional nuclear bomb to test technologies for creating components of a full-fledged thermonuclear charge.

The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization said a "man-made explosion" had occurred in the DPRK. The head of the CTBTO reported notes "Moscow Komsomol"that the magnitude of the earthquake after the explosion was 4,85 (the magnitude of the tests in 2013 was 4,9, and after all in 2013, there was no talk of testing the hydrogen bomb).

According to the head of the organization Lassino Zerbo, who leads "BBC", it is too early to say that it was a nuclear test. Scientists will wait to see if radioactive particles have been released into the air. As Mr. Zerbo pointed out, it may take up to 50 days to detect outliers.

The former head of the administration of the staff of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, the former chief of the General Staff of the Strategic Missile Forces, first deputy commander of the Strategic Missile Forces Colonel-General Viktor Yesin believes that the North Koreans are trying to create a compact nuclear charge for installation on a combat missile.

“In this case, one can only argue that the test of an explosive nuclear device was carried out,” he said. "MK". - The fact that this is a full-fledged nuclear bomb is not at all a fact. Only nuclear weapons were directly tested - an explosive nuclear device based on, as we assume, either weapons-grade plutonium or weapons-grade uranium. This is an independent development of North Korea. Nobody helped her in this, the Koreans made it themselves. And this is not their first test, but the fourth, which indirectly proves that everything was done without any outside help. ”

“At the same time, we believe,” the general added, “that Pyongyang’s statement about the tests, as they call it, a thermonuclear bomb, does not correspond to reality, since, according to available information, North Korea simply does not have the necessary material and technical basis for producing such a charge.”

The expert recalled that the manufacture of the appropriate device requires a heavy water nuclear reactor, while the DPRK does not have such a reactor. Therefore, the “information of the North Korean media”, in the opinion of the general, is “what they want, which they pass off as real.”

The expert of the American research center RAND Bruce Benette told on the air of the BBC that, most likely, the DPRK's hydrogen bomb failed. Or maybe the “leader” lied altogether. Bruce Benetta quotes Gazeta.ru:

““ The explosion, which was supposed to occur during the activation of the hydrogen bomb, would be ten times greater than the explosion that actually happened.

So when Kim Jong-un speaks about the hydrogen bomb, he can lie, and in fact, Pyongyang just blew up a very powerful nuclear bomb.

Or the North Koreans tried to blow up hydrogen weapons, but they didn’t work at full capacity. ”


The Russian reaction to the North Korean test is well known. January 6 Russian MFA website M. Zakharova's comment appeared in connection with the statement of the DPRK government about testing the hydrogen bomb.

The text notes that Russia is carefully studying the statement of the DPRK about testing bombs and analyzing technical control data.

“If the fact of the test is confirmed,” the document says, “this will be Pyongyang’s new step towards the development of nuclear weapons, which is a flagrant violation of international law and existing UN Security Council resolutions.”

The Russian Foreign Ministry called on all interested parties to maintain maximum exposure. “We reaffirm our position in favor of a diplomatic settlement of the problems of the Korean Peninsula within the framework of the six-party negotiation process and the early launch of a dialogue aimed at creating a reliable system of peace and security in the region,” the commentary notes.

* * *


Birthday toys are given to the child. So Kim Jong-un received another toy from his devoted Juche teammates. Only not plastic, but deadly nuclear.

In the 21st century, when world politicians, one after another, demonstrate a reluctance to live in peace and a denial of international understanding, and terrorism is expanding and freely sweeping across the planet, the coming global catastrophe is becoming more and more obvious. The fire of the Third World War can ignite any spark - for example, the unsuccessful test of another powerful bomb in the DPRK with the consequences of radioactive contamination. "Reliable system of the world", which hopes the Foreign Ministry of the Russian Federation, on the Korean Peninsula will not be as long as the Pyongyang child is playing with bombs.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +24
    11 January 2016 06: 45
    And the northern ones are doing it right, in a bomb somehow calmer than without her darling, the collapse of the social bloc, the complete disregard of a foreign sovereignty by amers somehow make us look at world opinion at universal values ​​and other liberal nonsense. Well done now let the Americans think.
    1. +5
      11 January 2016 06: 52
      I can’t understand one thing - why do they need a hydrogen bomb?
      It is larger than nuclear, requires more sophisticated technologies, its power is often excessive.
      In order for the United States to be afraid of North Korea, they need to improve their weapons delivery systems, and not scare the whole world with the hydrogen bomb that they have on (in) the ground.

      This is at least stupid - because it provokes a preemptive strike. And we, the Russian Federation, will not be able to defend North Korea in such a context.
      In general, something the North Korean leader played with and lost touch with reality ...
      1. +9
        11 January 2016 07: 37
        I can’t understand one thing - why do they need a hydrogen bomb?


        Well, imagine a crowd of gopniks standing in front of you (USA, JAPAN, FRANCE, ENGLAND, AUSTRALIA, etc.)

        and so you roll out a three-inch cannon (hydrogen bomb) from behind and say who steps over the line he will part with life ...
        there is clearly no one who wants to try their luck ... and the flight of the American B-52 at the borders of the great kingdom of JUICE ... to be honest, it made me laugh ... clowning.
      2. +2
        11 January 2016 14: 14
        Quote: Darkmor
        I can’t understand one thing - why do they need a hydrogen bomb?
        It is larger than nuclear, requires more sophisticated technologies, its power is often excessive.

        Since the advent of nuclear weapons, until about the end of the 70s, there was a continuous increase in the nuclear arsenal. The characteristics of North Korean delivery vehicles clearly do not correspond to modern realities. They are unlikely to be able to create a missile with a small CEP in the near future. There remains one thing - to increase the charge power. All the countries of the "nuclear club" went through this in their time.
      3. -2
        11 January 2016 14: 46
        I can’t understand one thing - why do they need a hydrogen bomb?


        Do they have it? Along the way, the Chinese needed another crisis on the Korean Peninsula, so they asked for the Kims. Well, they are happy to try. The nuclear bomb no longer scares anyone, so they wrote up about the thermonuclear / hydrogen one. Next time they will say that they have curbed the "black hole" and will throw it right into fascington. In general, the actions of the kims are completely illogical, which means they are made to order.
      4. 0
        12 January 2016 11: 49
        Quote: Darkmor
        It is larger than nuclear, requires more sophisticated technologies, its power is often excessive.

        These are massive misconceptions:
        1. I would say not a hydrogen bomb, but a three-stage device. Because can be used isotopes of lithium and helium.
        2. The dimensions of modern three-stage devices are limited by the size of the second "nuclear" degree, and their dimensions practically do not differ from conventional nuclear bombs, while it is easier to obtain the required power.
        3. I have great doubts about the possibilities of industrial production of the required amount of isotopes of light elements by North Korea and the possibility of maintaining these ammunition in good condition for more than 3 years.
    2. +9
      11 January 2016 06: 57
      There will be no “reliable peace system” that the Russian Foreign Ministry hopes for on the Korean Peninsula as long as a Pyongyang child plays with bombs.
      Oleg! hi I strongly disagree, Pyongyang would have been rolled into a pancake ... and North Korea would have been "democratized."
      1. -6
        11 January 2016 08: 49
        Wrong conclusion about the game with bombs ... Who is there, on their birthday, with 26 Gauges saluted? Moreover, in this case the victims were real ...
        1. +6
          11 January 2016 09: 17
          Quote: Oprychnik
          Wrong conclusion about the game with bombs ... Who is there, on their birthday, with 26 Gauges saluted? Moreover, in this case the victims were real ...

          but well-deserved.
        2. +5
          11 January 2016 09: 54
          Moreover, in this case the victims were real ...
          ISIS, i.e., thugs, these are victims! That is, Chikatilo, Goering and the company, too?
        3. 0
          12 January 2016 02: 00
          Cry for them.
      2. +2
        11 January 2016 14: 50
        Well, the Chinese wouldn't allow it. After all, this is their "backyard". But actually, the Kims are right. Even simply launching a few nuclear bombs on its territory, which will hit the victorious Fashington Marines and their South Korean sixes, will already be a big help in defense for the remaining fanatics. You look, and democratizers will get tired of scattering radiation around. Moreover, everyone, from Russia and China to Japan, will be greatly dissatisfied with such a development of events near their borders.
    3. 0
      17 January 2016 09: 46
      So in case of any mess, their mattresses will be erased into powder with their YaS.
  2. 0
    11 January 2016 07: 02
    Another monkey with a nuclear grenade. They are justified only by the fact that the Americans will not go there precisely because they do not know exactly about the presence or absence of the North Koreans of nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles. According to indirect data, the threat of a response is quite real. So you have to endure such "undemocracy" near your Japanese possessions.
    1. 0
      11 January 2016 10: 37
      Why are our partners so afraid of Sev.Koreyu, and with DAISH are relaxed ..?
      Or maybe here lies our dangerous non-standard approach for them, when the DPRK launches one of our dove \ poplar with tattoo \ hieroglyphs on blocks by state ...
      The result will be immediately on the stock exchange and in our pocket ..!
      Then prove that it is not a DPRK rocket ... And you don’t even need to take anything to Havana.
      Just two AN-124 flew in, pulled under the cover of clouds and, while the rocket was flying, flew back ... laughing
      They will not start, without understanding, the war ..! And it will be: by their own methods and by themselves.
      It's time ... it's time to give them a knee in the ass.
      1. 0
        11 January 2016 12: 13
        A cow like AN-124 is easily tracked by radar. Here, cloudiness is not a hindrance. Now, if you assumed the quiet transport and deployment of a ground launcher ...
        Then, exactly, no one will prove anything.
        1. 0
          12 January 2016 11: 52
          Quote: abrakadabre
          A cow like the AN-124 is easily tracked by radar.

          The maximum detection range by patrols is about 500 km. I think the rocket that he drags will fly at least 4 times more.
    2. +4
      11 January 2016 21: 02
      "Another monkey with a nuclear grenade."
      It's strange. It looks like the enemy wrote. North Korea, despite all the threats and constant pressure, <remained loyal to its chosen ideals and sovereignty. How many countries in the world have their own, not imposed ideals, and have true sovereignty? And where do the previous, and not the next, "monkeys" who have a "nuclear grenade" rule? Is it Israel? USA, France, Pakistan, tell us where are the monkeys with nuclear grenades?
      The people of North Korea, experiencing constant deprivation, made a giant scientific and technological breakthrough. This whole story reminds me of the second half of the forties of the last century in the USSR. Devotion to ideals, willingness to go into deprivation for the sake of achieving the great goal of independence and freedom, only such a people and country are worthy of respect.
      And the people <who allowed themselves to be deceived and exchanged lofty ideals for a hundred varieties of sausage, whose army, having violated the oath, did not stand up to defend the constitutional order and fired at its own parliament, forever betraying and forever drunk presidents who is this? Or what is it?
  3. +6
    11 January 2016 07: 22
    North Korea’s hydrogen bomb is bad, but with today's western lawlessness, with the UN not working, everyone is looking for their own way to defend themselves ....
  4. +21
    11 January 2016 07: 30
    Judging by the content, this is an article by MK. The "logic" is characteristic of them.
    In fact, the DPRK has not fought since 1953, the United States during this time has conducted several dozen aggressive wars in all parts of the world. US military bases are located in South Korea and Japan (including carriers of nuclear weapons), the United States and South Korea are constantly conducting military exercises about borders of the DPRK (including with the participation of nuclear weapons carriers), the United States and its satellites impose and support "sanctions" against the DPRK. But with all this, according to the logic of the MK, it is "to blame" for the entire DPRK. It is North Korea that "undermines the world" and is "aggressor".
    What can I say ... Russia will never become a strong and rich country, at least capitalistic, at least socialist, at least some, if its key media will work for the interests of foreign powers (in this case, the USA), in this case, given the attitude towards us USA, we are just doomed ...
  5. 0
    11 January 2016 07: 30
    The Americans do not go far there, not only because Pyongyang has nuclear weapons. They are simply hung up without such nuclear weapons there, which will not seem enough. Otherwise, they would have been stuck long ago.
    1. 0
      11 January 2016 10: 25
      Quote: Ozhogin Dmitry
      Americans don’t go far there, not only because

      Quote: Ozhogin Dmitry
      Otherwise, they would have stuck long ago.

      Are you sir, brother of Pedalik Klitschko ??? your friend’s syllable hurts ...
      1. +1
        11 January 2016 21: 05
        But it's okay that the syllable is like that. The thought is traceable. And the thought is correct. And this is the main thing. As a rule, liberally wise thoughts are presented beautifully, are essentially false, and essentially harmful.
      2. -1
        12 January 2016 02: 15
        After "you" I forgot to put a punctuation mark nicknamed "comma", dropout. Read the primary sources: Primer, Buratino's ABC, etc. There is nothing to say on the topic - nikshni.
  6. -4
    11 January 2016 07: 41
    A nuclear explosion is not an F-1 blast, it cannot be overlooked (ours are silent) and if this test took place the reaction would be different I think that a powerful high-explosive bomb exploded and this fool who had no idea what a thermonuclear reaction said that a hydrogen bomb was blown up By the way, this is not good for us - the enemies got a reason to increase their military presence near our borders in the Asia-Pacific region
  7. -8
    11 January 2016 07: 42
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    There will be no “reliable peace system” that the Russian Foreign Ministry hopes for on the Korean Peninsula as long as a Pyongyang child plays with bombs.
    Oleg! hi I strongly disagree, Pyongyang would have been rolled into a pancake ... and North Korea would have been "democratized."

    Let us then all have nuclear weapons and sit on an even larger "powder keg" and be afraid that some dwarf state might use these weapons. It should remain only with those states that now have it in large quantities. Such toys cannot be trusted by everyone in a row - this is a huge responsibility for the safety of life on the entire planet.
    1. +4
      11 January 2016 09: 20
      Quote: chikenous59
      if then everyone will have nuclear weapons and we will sit on an even larger "powder keg"

      what, the example of Libya, Syria is not inspiring? but Eun-sees. What if we didn’t have a strong club? How long would you live?
      1. -11
        11 January 2016 10: 44
        It is time for ALL to get rid of nuclear weapons. This is understandable, it is a pity the world is ruled in most by the backroom inadequate.
    2. +5
      11 January 2016 12: 18
      The only inadequate on the planet who used nuclear weapons and who can’t be trusted in any way, to remind?
  8. +3
    11 January 2016 07: 57
    "Little Kim" does everything right because he wants to live, plus this is an opportunity to demonstrate to China that the UK is ready for battle and it will not be superfluous to get buns for it.
    But the States were a little late, they could crush the UK in the 90s, but now it is no longer an option, since the "teeth" cut through)))
    And about the sanctions: The northerners wanted to spit on them, how much they strangled, and they live.
    Well done in one word!)
    1. -1
      11 January 2016 21: 12
      "Little Kim" does everything right because he wants to live, "
      If the "kid ..." wanted to live on his own, there would be Gorby-2. And he wants the country of "Morning freshness" to live.
    2. +1
      11 January 2016 21: 16
      Quote: Krieg_XIII
      "Little Kim" does everything right because he wants to live, plus this is an opportunity to demonstrate to China that the UK is ready for battle and it will not be superfluous to get buns for it.
      But the States were a little late, they could crush the UK in the 90s, but now it is no longer an option, since the "teeth" cut through)))
      And about the sanctions: The northerners wanted to spit on them, how much they strangled, and they live.
      Well done in one word!)

      If oil had been strangled there for a long time - and since they wouldn’t touch him (Kim) and would not touch him, keeping him the status of a scarecrow with a nuclear cudgel - it is beneficial for mattresses in this quality
  9. +1
    11 January 2016 07: 59
    Now the merikatos will be completely borzoi with the southerners. And there - those who have weaker nerves.
  10. +5
    11 January 2016 08: 02
    Well, what should the Koreans do? You watch how the Americans tear to pieces one country after another
  11. +3
    11 January 2016 08: 10
    All right, success in their further development. Only 6 kilotons, and the Anglo-Saxon world has already managed to pile in his pants.
  12. +4
    11 January 2016 08: 18
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    .and the flight of the American B-52 at the borders of the kingdom of the great JUUCHE ... to be honest, it made me laugh ... clowning.

    Totally agree with you. The United States simply made it clear to South Korea once again that it was "always ready" to help and drove in a whole B-52. But you can't scare the DPRK with that. And the North Koreans remember 51-53 very well. therefore ready for anything. The only bad thing is that nuclear weapons are being tested near our borders (the Khasansky district of Primorsky Krai borders on the DPRK).
  13. -2
    11 January 2016 08: 43
    Quote: Darkmor
    I can’t understand one thing - why do they need a hydrogen bomb?
    It is larger than nuclear, requires more sophisticated technologies, its power is often excessive.
    In order for the United States to be afraid of North Korea, they need to improve their weapons delivery systems, and not scare the whole world with the hydrogen bomb that they have on (in) the ground.

    This is at least stupid - because it provokes a preemptive strike. And we, the Russian Federation, will not be able to defend North Korea in such a context.
    In general, something the North Korean leader played with and lost touch with reality ...

    In all this, only one good thing is that the new version of the agreement with the DPRK does not contain an article on assistance in the event of aggression. The bad thing is that all this will be on our borders and in the event of a nuclear conflict we will get to the full. And rainfall on our territory, and hundreds of thousands (millions) of refugees.

    Quote: The same Lech
    I can’t understand one thing - why do they need a hydrogen bomb?


    Well, imagine a crowd of gopniks standing in front of you (USA, JAPAN, FRANCE, ENGLAND, AUSTRALIA, etc.)

    and so you roll out a three-inch cannon (hydrogen bomb) from behind and say who steps over the line he will part with life ...
    there is clearly no one who wants to try their luck ... and the flight of the American B-52 at the borders of the great kingdom of JUICE ... to be honest, it made me laugh ... clowning.

    And the aforementioned USA, FRANCE, ENGLAND should understand "three-inch" (TNW) no? And they won't roll out more of them in return. Clownery with a B-52 flight? Rather, it’s a reaction to Kim’s clownery, when everyone already unanimously asserts that Russia, incl. that a nuclear charge was blown up, and he persistently continues to broadcast about a hydrogen bomb. There would be a thermonuclear charge - at such a depth of explosion, firstly, there would be a completely different magnitude, and secondly, there would be such an outburst that only a blind person would not see these tests.

    Quote: inkass_98
    Another monkey with a nuclear grenade. The only justification for them is that the Americans do not tuck in there precisely because they do not know exactly about the presence or absence of nuclear charges and delivery vehicles in the North Koreans.

    Do they need it? The Americans are well aware that those who are fanatically devoted to the Juche ideas will fight to the last and the losses from the Americans without the use of weapons of mass destruction will be very large. In addition, their ally, which is now a counterweight to the DPRK, will also be practically destroyed. The Soviet Union has been gone for a quarter of a century, and if there was a need, the Americans would have rolled the DPRK long ago. Iraq, incomparably stronger than North Korea was destroyed. But here the leftovers would also have to be fed. So, apparently, they counted, and found out that it is better not to touch this "reserve". But Kim is not profitable when they don't talk about him, when there is no food aid from both the UN and the United States.

    And the presence of a country like the DPRK even 20-30 nuclear charges in the absence of delivery systems and "ancient" aviation will not be a deterrent in which case
    1. +2
      11 January 2016 10: 27
      DPRK has more than enough means of delivery - they will reach all US bases in the region and Hawaii in range.
      1. +1
        11 January 2016 11: 52
        Which are covered by missile defense, and if it cannot hold back our massive blow, the DPRK will roll out small and primitive missiles without difficulty, even for us this missile defense is a danger, because of which our people constantly shout that the missile defense is against us and threatens our forces, and We are creating more and more effective means of overcoming missile defense.
      2. +1
        11 January 2016 13: 42
        Quote: Vadim237
        DPRK has more than enough means of delivery - they will reach all US bases in the region and Hawaii in range.

        There are really a lot of means of delivery for the DPRK, but only the US bases in the South Caucasus are guaranteed to be affected, with bases in Japan and the Philippines there may be problems.
        But it does not matter what is struck with a 100% guarantee, first of all, is Seoul. The complete destruction of the capital in any case makes sense for the South Caucasus aggression against the DPRK.
        It’s another matter that the USA makes decisions there and if they deem it necessary they can start a war regardless of the interests of the South Caucasus.
        1. +1
          11 January 2016 14: 50
          Missile defense cannot be saved from launching several hundreds of tactical missiles in South Korea from the North Korean side, but Seoul and the entire border area will be destroyed in the first half hour.
    2. +1
      11 January 2016 16: 31
      Old26
      But it’s not profitable for Kim when they don’t talk about him, when there is no food aid both from the UN and from the USA


      Dear “Old 26”, trust less (or better not believe at all) the Russian liberal media. After all, any normal, sane Russian who has not torn himself away from the people sees and knows that the liberal media are a bunch of Western podolosses, grant-eaters and Russophobes.
      Well, why repeat this crap about the ever-starving North Korea? Honestly speaking, they got these nonsense about Koreans dying of hunger, about North Korean dystrophics, who also (all without exception) are five centimeters lower than the South Koreans. Nonsense all this!
      North Koreans do not starve at all and their growth is normal and they eat normal, natural foods, unlike southerners, who, like us, are forced to consume a surrogate beetle and thereby poison their body. I will give illustrative arguments. This summer, the central orchestra of the Russian Defense Ministry under the direction of Major General Khalilov visited Pyongyang.
      During the joint (together with Korean musicians) performance of the march in honor of the commander Kim Il Sung, an orchestra of Korean girls is on a par with ours. As we see, they are by no means dystrophic and are not inferior in growth, perhaps, to our heroes.
      By the way, pay attention to how much attention and respect belonged to our orchestra.

      March of the military orchestra of the Ministry of Defense of Russia and the DPRK musicians in Pyongyang.

    3. -1
      11 January 2016 16: 46
      Old26
      But it’s not profitable for Kim when they don’t talk about him, when there is no food aid both from the UN and from the USA


      Dear “Old 26”, indeed in North Korea there was a difficult period caused by severe natural disasters and the consequences of the collapse of the socialist camp. There really was a famine, and people were dying. But let's not forget that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, our people were also in poverty and died a million a year.
      But, in North Korea, this difficult period has been overcome and people are provided with normal (not surrogate) food. Watch the video that you can buy in a Korean grocery store.

      TV DPRK: "Mansugyo shop" Meat and Fish ".


    4. +1
      11 January 2016 16: 54
      Old26
      But it’s not profitable for Kim when they don’t talk about him, when there is no food aid both from the UN and from the USA


      Dear "Old 26", this is how the collective farm near Pyongyang looks like in which natural (not surrogate) food is grown. In my opinion, this would be what the Russian village should look like. If you shugan liberal Russophobes from Russia, we will have such villages.

      Agricultural cooperative near Pyongyang.
      1. -1
        12 January 2016 04: 31
        And I work with Koreans, and besides them, there are no people willing. And I have never met worse workers! There are even colonels among their "captains" (foremen, foremen).
        And do not tell how everything is wonderful there, it would be all hurt would not go to work.
        1. 0
          12 January 2016 05: 16
          Quote: Login_Off
          And I have never met workers worse!

          Explicitly lying, most likely you forget to pay them money .. I had North Koreans and indeed captains and colonels, I didn’t have time to buy them everything necessary for the construction and repair of the repair, but the main thing was that they did a certain amount of work - if you like, they’ll settle down otherwise I don’t work, after I understood this simple algorithm I didn’t have any problems with them ..
          1. 0
            15 January 2016 03: 44
            Yes, I will not argue with you. :)
        2. -1
          12 January 2016 23: 40
          Login_Off
          And I work with Koreans, and besides them, there are no people willing. And I have never met worse workers! There are even colonels among their "captains" (foremen, foremen).
          And do not tell how everything is wonderful there, it would be all hurt would not go to work.


          Yes, everything is much simpler. These North Korean construction crews didn’t contract you for construction work for a piece of bread. These are the first North Korean entrepreneurs who came, so to speak, for a long ruble, or rather, for a dollar. Individual entrepreneurship in the DPRK is already allowed. So, they will earn dollars here, return home, exchange them for won and become rich (by Korean standards) people.
          There is something else interesting. That it is already possible to legally go to work abroad and calmly return.
  14. +7
    11 January 2016 09: 05
    Unfortunately, these latter are politicians who are confident that they are threatened by the whole world, and therefore they need to stock up on thermonuclear bombs and detonate them, demonstrating their "strength."

    Yes, yes, yes. Nobody threatened Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, Slobodan Milosevic. They just tried to negotiate with the world, and where are they now?
    1. +1
      11 January 2016 11: 56
      Especially Saddam Hussein attacked Iran, and fought with it for a bunch of years laughing
  15. -4
    11 January 2016 09: 35
    ... The "reliable peace system" that the Russian Foreign Ministry hopes will not be on the Korean Peninsula as long as the Pyongyang child plays with bombs.As well as his generals.
  16. -1
    11 January 2016 09: 59
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    Quote: chikenous59
    if then everyone will have nuclear weapons and we will sit on an even larger "powder keg"

    what, the example of Libya, Syria is not inspiring? but Eun-sees. What if we didn’t have a strong club? How long would you live?

    I believe that nuclear weapons are no longer toys. Someone will apply it and rush a chain reaction. The temptation to use will be in other countries. Any totalitarian regimes ruled by fanatics cannot be trusted with such a weapon. This is my personal opinion.
    The Russian leadership is in solidarity with the western. Nuclear weapons are the elite’s weapon to maintain world order. Our world is the jungle, and man still has animal instincts and will always kill or rob. So nature has created us like that. Someone will always suffer, someone will always be the loser.
    Do not forget the geographical location of Korea. It is very close to our borders. And if there begins a nuclear war, then we will suffer greatly from this. Do we need it? I think no.
    1. +1
      11 January 2016 10: 28
      It depends on how many atomic bombs explode there and the direction of the winds.
    2. +9
      11 January 2016 10: 33
      I believe that nuclear weapons are no longer toys. Someone will apply it and rush a chain reaction. The temptation to use will be in other countries. Such totalitarian regimes cannot be trusted with such weapons.

      Those. For "democratic" regimes such a weapon is just right. And the main thing is that the "stronghold of democracy" was the first to use it. And constantly rattles them. Yes, it shakes him so much that it constantly falls off somewhere, then in one place it will fall from the plane, then in another, then they search hard. And yet the "democrats" are so concerned about the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons. They just say that you don't invent your own nuclear weapons, we have already invented everything and are already bringing you our bombs, and since you do not know how to use them, there will still be our soldiers, airplanes, tanks, so that, God forbid, you yourself did not want to learn how to use these bombs and rackets.

      I wonder why one can, but not the other? If we hadn’t, where would we be now?
      The question is good:
      - You have oil (gas, gold, the Panama Canal, etc.), but there is no democracy, so we will bang you!
      - And we will defend ourselves and answer!
      - Eeee guys! And you can’t answer! This is a violation of all resolutions! Therefore, you are also to blame for this!
  17. +1
    11 January 2016 10: 12
    Quote: aszzz888
    Now the merikatos will be completely borzoi with the southerners. And there - those who have weaker nerves.

    It is unlikely that they will be very greyhound. Russia is close by, and we do not need this nuclear showdown. Everyone understands this.
  18. +1
    11 January 2016 10: 33
    Quote: Aleksander
    North Korea’s hydrogen bomb is bad, but with today's western lawlessness, with the UN not working, everyone is looking for their own way to defend themselves ....

    South, as a mongrel of the United States, constantly provokes conflict. They cannot leave the DPRK alone. What then remains to be done to the North? And, on Kim Jong-un, so much dirt and fables have been poured that it seems that is it all bad in the DPRK?
    1. cap
      +2
      11 January 2016 11: 12
      Quote: avva2012
      Quote: Aleksander
      North Korea’s hydrogen bomb is bad, but with today's western lawlessness, with the UN not working, everyone is looking for their own way to defend themselves ....

      South, as a mongrel of the United States, constantly provokes conflict. They cannot leave the DPRK alone. What then remains to be done to the North? And, on Kim Jong-un, so much dirt and fables have been poured that it seems that is it all bad in the DPRK?


      I don’t understand one thing, well, Koreans live what to climb to them. The Americans no longer know who to get into with their democracy. There are discords, refugees, and devastation around.
      Everywhere, wherever you put a finger on the card, they are star-striped everywhere. Obama the peacemaker has twisted such a thing, there isn’t enough fingers to bend on his hands. They have specially chosen the Muslim president as a colored person to smear and blame for the dirt 100 years after. And he behaves like suck on dismantling. The truth smiles less often than before. It seems that he understood, but he won’t be able to win back.
      1. 0
        11 January 2016 14: 55
        This year, the "peacemaker" in the United States will be replaced, whether there will be Clinton - the one that is crazy, or Trump - the one that the businessman does not throw words to the wind.
    2. +1
      11 January 2016 17: 03
      avva2012
      South, as a mongrel of the United States, constantly provokes conflict. They cannot leave the DPRK alone. What then remains to be done to the North? And, on Kim Jong-un, so much dirt and fables have been poured that it seems that is it all bad in the DPRK?


      Yes, the trick is that things are going well in the DPRK! And this is to our and foreign liberals like a rusty sickle in the balls. For the past thirty years, starting with Gorbachev’s “glasnost”, liberals have been instilling a mantra to us that they say that socialism is a dead end and does not withstand any competition with capitalism. Capitalism, the market and globalization - say, your bright future.
      As a result, we now slurp this capitalist "paradise" with a full spoon. But the DPRK, the only country from the entire former social camp, which did not fall for the sweet songs of Western liberals (due to the fact that they were timely weighed and prevented from germinating) and continued to build socialism.
      That's just their Korean socialism, without Marxism-Leninism, proletarian internationalism, the dictatorship of the proletariat and other ideological crap, which we once brought passengers in a sealed carriage. Juche ideas are generally simple: everything is for their people under the leadership of leaders who are flesh from the flesh of their own people.
      DPRK, continuing to build its Korean socialism, overcame the catastrophe in which it was not through its own fault and now has tremendous achievements in construction, industry, science and culture. Here, for example, how to build in the DPRK.


      NEW CONSTRUCTIONS IN DPRK

    3. 0
      11 January 2016 17: 14
      avva2012
      South, as a mongrel of the United States, constantly provokes conflict. They cannot leave the DPRK alone. What then remains to be done to the North? And, on Kim Jong-un, so much dirt and fables have been poured that it seems that is it all bad in the DPRK?


      Not bad things in North Korea and with electronics. The DPRK does not import, but it itself produces televisions, cell phones, computers and other equipment.

      TV DPRK: "Brand of electronic goods of the DPRK -" Purynhanyl ".
    4. +1
      11 January 2016 17: 20
      avva2012
      South, as a mongrel of the United States, constantly provokes conflict. They cannot leave the DPRK alone. What then remains to be done to the North? And, on Kim Jong-un, so much dirt and fables have been poured that it seems that is it all bad in the DPRK?


      And this, the newly built temple of science and technology in Pyongyang

      Temple of Science and Technology

      1. 0
        11 January 2016 20: 39
        Interestingly, the DPRK with energy supply solved the problem.
        1. -1
          11 January 2016 21: 23
          Vadim237
          Interestingly, the DPRK with energy supply solved the problem.


          There is a problem with electricity. The country is booming, there is not enough electricity. Without the construction of a nuclear power plant, the problem cannot be solved.
          1. 0
            11 January 2016 21: 46
            And tidal power plants can ride there.
    5. +3
      11 January 2016 17: 38
      avva2012
      South, as a mongrel of the United States, constantly provokes conflict. They cannot leave the DPRK alone. What then remains to be done to the North? And, on Kim Jong-un, so much dirt and fables have been poured that it seems that is it all bad in the DPRK?


      The situation with music in the DPRK is very good. North Korean music easily interrupts the so-called South Korean musical wave, which is being actively promoted in the West. Tickets from the hands to the concert of the ensemble "Moranbon", which was to be held in Beijing on December 10, cost two thousand dollars! For Pugachev and Kirkorov they have never given so much and will not.
      Soloist of "Moranbon". KPA captain, singer, athlete, Komsomol member and just a beauty.


      Full concert of the ensemble "Morabon"
  19. +1
    11 January 2016 11: 01
    Quote: Andrew NM
    I believe that nuclear weapons are no longer toys. Someone will apply it and rush a chain reaction. The temptation to use will be in other countries. Such totalitarian regimes cannot be trusted with such weapons.

    Those. For "democratic" regimes such a weapon is just right. And the main thing is that the "stronghold of democracy" was the first to use it. And constantly rattles them. Yes, it shakes him so much that it constantly falls off somewhere, then in one place it will fall from the plane, then in another, then they search hard. And yet the "democrats" are so concerned about the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons. They just say that you don't invent your own nuclear weapons, we have already invented everything and are already bringing you our bombs, and since you do not know how to use them, there will still be our soldiers, airplanes, tanks, so that, God forbid, you yourself did not want to learn how to use these bombs and rackets.

    I wonder why one can, but not the other? If we hadn’t, where would we be now?
    The question is good:
    - You have oil (gas, gold, the Panama Canal, etc.), but there is no democracy, so we will bang you!
    - And we will defend ourselves and answer!
    - Eeee guys! And you can’t answer! This is a violation of all resolutions! Therefore, you are also to blame for this!

    One is possible, and the other is not, because we live according to the laws of the jungle, you need to understand this.
    Do not look at the world through pink glasses. He who is stronger enjoys such privileges. Small countries will never be allowed to live in peace. They will always be robbed and torn. Such a peculiar natural selection.
    They will not be able to live well, otherwise there will be so many of us on the planet that no resources will be enough to continue life. Rejoice that we are a huge, great country and have nuclear weapons. To all small countries such as the DPRK, it is useless. And with him and without him they will be squeezed, robbed, etc. And the presence of nuclear weapons in the DPRK will only worsen the consequences of conflicts.

    We do not live in paradise, where everything is quiet, smooth, sweet. We live on a limited plot of land where resources are limited. The strongest survives. And the strongest is not interested in the appearance of competitors, hence the war. The world will always fight, without it in any way. It is very good that we, Russia, are ready for this.
    1. +3
      11 January 2016 11: 47
      One is possible, and the other is not, because we live according to the laws of the jungle, you need to understand this.


      Here I am about that.
      "Provide capital with 10% profit, and the capital agrees to any use, at 20% it becomes lively, at 50% it is positively ready to break its head, at 100% it violates all human laws, with 300% there is no crime for which it does not would venture to go, at least under pain of the gallows "

      Is that familiar? In order to not touch the little ones, they have to look for options, even suicidal, i.e. if they climb to them, then they will pull along. Another point is the mentality of the state. Well, if the state, for example, is a monarchy, and have been living there for hundreds of years, is this a reason for intervention? Especially if they don’t touch anyone around? Iran attacked over the past many years? And the mentality of the aggressor. Anglo-Saxons captured and robbed their entire history, not stopping at the destruction of the population.
  20. 0
    11 January 2016 11: 08
    Quote: Vadim237
    It depends on how many atomic bombs explode there and the direction of the winds.

    North Korea borders our territory. Who will take risks by letting everything drift away, expecting that only one bomb will explode there and the wind will carry radiation away from Russia? I think there are no such idiots in the government.
    1. 0
      11 January 2016 15: 07
      Judging by the directions of air flows, most likely nuclear clouds will go to China and refugees will flood into China, not a single atomic bomb will explode - a dozen or more. What government are you talking about? In the event of such an emergency as nuclear pollution in Russia, our Ministry of Emergency Situations and the Russian Chemical Forces storage facilities have long been prepared, including in the territory of neighboring states.
  21. 0
    11 January 2016 11: 44
    Would there be any hints about the presence of nuclear weapons at Milosevic, Hussein, Gaddafi would have put up to them staffers? It is clear that it is not worth giving out to everyone in a row, but sometimes even unsuccessful trials serve as a good vaccine against the desire to democratize another country.
    1. +1
      11 January 2016 11: 54
      Yes, they would have bombed anyway. If ours is constantly afraid of various global attacks, with missile defense, then such countries will not be able to create a sufficient number, enough advanced missiles to survive a disarming strike, followed by beating off the remnants by missile defense forces.
      1. 0
        11 January 2016 15: 13
        Now there will not be any disarming strike - with the launch of enemy missiles, rockets in the mines will also take off.
    2. 0
      11 January 2016 15: 11
      Iraq began nuclear research - but did not succeed, in the 80s the object where the research was carried out was destroyed, in 91 the war began and in the 2000s Iraq was finally finished off.
  22. 0
    11 January 2016 12: 13
    The intelligence of South Korea, openly voiced in the country's parliament, the agency said, show that the power of the explosion was about six kilotons in TNT. And the lower limit of the power of thermonuclear charges is hundreds of kilotons.

    One of the leading experts says that the monitoring data and statements of the DPRK fully correspond to the scenario of the explosion of a device that has a small power output, but emits an excessive amount of gamma rays. Peter Pry, an expert on pulsed electromagnetic weapons, told WND that the explosion was actually a test of such a device. Pry said that Pyongyang's latest test followed three others, each in the range of 10 kilotons or less. It was a "different kind of hydrogen bomb", a neutron bomb, or a weapon with enhanced radiation, such as a super-EMP weapon.
    Such a weapon is, in fact, "a very low yield hydrogen bomb, which typically has an output of 1 to 10 kilotons, like a North Korean device," he said.
    Something, I, South Korea can not believe it.
    1. 0
      11 January 2016 15: 18
      And you believe - in the USA and Great Britain there are such hydrogen bombs, for example, the thermonuclear warhead W 80 with variable power from 5 to 150 kilotons.
  23. +3
    11 January 2016 19: 08
    All the same, we sometimes have amazing people. Here, in this case, the author is trying to question the right of the people of North Korea by all means available to him to ensure their own security. Here is the irony about the birthday of the leader of this country and sarcasm, and all to the heap. Including even some reverence before the USA. And angry philippics against the DPRK. Let's remember something. First of all, who are the closest neighbors of the DPRK? Are these states friendly to her or openly hostile to her? Japan possesses powerful and modern armed forces, and according to some reports it possesses both nuclear weapons and their means of delivery.
    The army of South Korea is also modernized and is among the ten largest armies in the world in number.
    Interestingly, the DPRK has reason to worry about its own security? Regardless of the nature of the regime in Pyongyang, ideology and economics — is there any reason to be afraid of your neighbors on the basis of your own bitter and bloody experience throughout the 20th century?
    Secondly, at least the DPRK unleashed a war or a military conflict? And Japan? And the US "beacon of democracy"?
    As far as we know, not a single Korean bomb has fallen on the Japanese islands, let alone the United States. Not a single Japanese or US civilian was killed by a Korean soldier. And nevertheless, they constantly talk about the "North Korean threat", under the pretext of which they are building up arms along the perimeter of the DPRK and pursuing a policy of economic blockade of this country for decades. Not to mention the fact that Japan also has territorial claims to its former colony ...
    Although, soon the media will erase the inconvenient historical truth from people's memory and turn everything upside down. Over there, in Ukraine, they are already cursing their own heroic past and extolling the Nazis and murderers, and those who killed their grandfathers. They would have shouted "Heilgitler", but so far Germany is not ready to encourage them in this.
  24. 0
    11 January 2016 21: 07
    Quote: abrakadabre
    A cow like AN-124 is easily tracked by radar. Here, cloudiness is not a hindrance. Now, if you assumed the quiet transport and deployment of a ground launcher ...
    Then, exactly, no one will prove anything.

    Any degree of hostility has a moral side. If we reach the state of "quiet transportation and deployment of a ground launcher ...", and then also "fired under the cover of clouds", destroying a couple of cities with residents, and they think about the DPRK ... Who are we ourselves, we will be ?
  25. 0
    13 January 2016 21: 04
    Quote: Vadim237
    Missile defense cannot be saved from launching several hundreds of tactical missiles in South Korea from the North Korean side, but Seoul and the entire border area will be destroyed in the first half hour.

    The DPRK does have several hundred tactical missiles. That's just the number of PUs themselves is much less (about 10 times)

    Quote: Gong3
    Dear “Old 26”, trust less (or better not believe at all) the Russian liberal media. After all, any normal, sane Russian who has not torn himself away from the people sees and knows that the liberal media are a bunch of Western podolosses, grant-eaters and Russophobes. Well, why repeat this crap
    about the continuously starving North Korea?

    Alexander! And I wrote somewhere about the famine in the DPRK? It was in the 90s (famine), but food supplies from the UN, and from the United States, and from China, and a number of other countries nonetheless exist.

    Quote: Vadim237
    And you believe - in the USA and Great Britain there are such hydrogen bombs, for example, the thermonuclear warhead W 80 with variable power from 5 to 150 kilotons.

    Vadim. Do not confuse thermonuclear munitions with variable power and munitions with increased radiation output. W-80 just with variable power. Americans neutron had the following charges:
    W-70 mod. 3 (for BR "LENS". Power 0,75 kt)
    W-70 mod. 4 (for BR "LENS". Power 1,25 kt)
    W-79 mod. 0 option Y1 (203-mm artillery shell. Power 0,1 kt)
    W-79 mod. 0 option Y2 (203-mm artillery shell. Power 0,7 kt)
    W-79 mod. 0 option Y3 (203-mm artillery shell. Power 1,1 kt)
    W-82 mod. 1 (155 mm artillery shell. Power 0,7kt)

    Now they are no longer in the arsenals. Our experts nevertheless come to the conclusion that a bomb with the addition of isotopes was tested, i.e. almost dirty