He was right, in Moscow, and in general in Russia, everyone understood this, from the bottom up. Therefore, the Maidan in Russia has become impossible, so the rating of President Vladimir Putin, who personified, including Antimaydan, soared up at an unimaginable height.
We will never forgive Bandera neo-Nazis, and we will not forget the provocative role of Washington, however, there is no evil without good: their Kiev pogrom became a vivid lesson and a warning to Russia.
Kiev Maidan became a litmus test for all of our own “banderlogov”, he put a sort of Bandera stamp on all Makarevich and Shenderovichi. Before that, they were just belolentochniki, and after Kiev Maidan they became accomplices of Bandera neo-Nazis - feel the difference! Moreover, a part of the Russian ultranationalists suddenly showed a Bandera grin in the Azov and Aidar regions in the Donbas who had risen against the neo-Nazis!
Today it becomes clear that 22 February 2014 of the year in Kiev on Euromaidan started the Third World War, the United States and its closest satellites against Russia, in a hybrid form, because the atomic weapon makes a hot military conflict between the US and Russia suicidal. Only for this reason ... Although, there are strategists in Washington who are ready to take the risk of a heated military conflict. They are building a missile defense system and reasoning publicly about a possible lightning-fast global strike against Russia.
As in the 1941 year, the enemy suddenly attacked, took advantage of an insignificant, in general, excuse, just a delay by President Yanukovych of the Euro-Association of Ukraine, and made a coup in Kiev, brought pro-American puppets to power. In fact, the United States, capturing Ukraine in a hybrid form, repeated Hitler’s success in 1941, and turned it into his colony and foothold. The euphemism "external control of Ukraine", which is used by political scientists, is just the politically correct name of the colony.
However, the struggle for Ukraine did not end there; it became a battleground when, in response to the neo-Nazi "revolution of dignity", the Russian spring flourished in the South-East of Ukraine. Then Russia successfully counterattacked the United States in the Crimea and the Donbas.
Today, Washington supports Bandera only as an anti-Russian government, and it is held thanks to its support. Jeffrey Payette, the US ambassador in Kyiv, recently had the folly of saying this publicly on the Prime Time program on the Ukrainian First National Channel: “Kharkiv and Odessa will never return to Russia — Ukraine has already“ defeated Vladimir Putin. ”
Payette gives out for the "victory" success in the first battle, but it has happened before. In fact, the hybrid world war is just beginning; in the 2016 year we will see its next stage. The financial and economic problems of the United States are becoming aggravated, and therefore the desire to write them off to world war is becoming more and more tempting for "world elites." Unfortunately, the negative scenario of the growth of a hybrid war in the world is more likely.
Probably, it will start with the fact that the Minsk agreements will fall, one way or another, it is unclear only when? Another question: how will the celebration of the second anniversary of the coup in Kiev 22 of February end, that is, what final form will the Bandera regime in Ukraine take? Will President Poroshenko sweep away the second stage of the neo-Nazi “revolution of dignity” that ideological Bandera talk about, or will Poroshenko be able to push through his own “non-ideological” dictatorship by clearing out all Bandera Forester activists? This will be the famous Rubicon, the transition through which will take place in less than two months ...
In general, there are no coincidences of such magnitude as the victory of the neo-Nazi revolution in Kiev and the establishment of US colonial rule in Ukraine. For example, the Second World War could have taken a different, more sinister character, if Russia-the USSR had resisted, on the whole, on the borders in 1941 the year after Hitler’s strike, and there would have been no retreat to Moscow itself.
Then the anti-Hitler coalition might not have formed, on the contrary, the United States and England would most likely have sided with Hitler against the "Stalinist aggression" that threatened a "civilized Europe." This conclusion comes in later discussions about the course of the war A.A. Zinoviev, a Soviet dissident philosopher who fought in the Great Patriotic War on a flying tank "IL-2."
Similarly, if Russia had firmly responded to the coup in Kiev in 2014, sent troops to Ukraine, today there would be a tough confrontation with the collective West. Without responding toughly on Bandera’s seizure with the support of the United States to most of Ukraine, Russia maintained a balance in the world, and with this the possibility of creating an anti-American coalition.
Rather, coalitions against the elite group of American neo-cons who were neo-Trotskyists, today led by H. Clinton, using America’s power to establish their domination in the world by inciting the World permanent and pro-communist revolution according to the recipes of Leon Trotsky. Under the guise of the spread of democracy in the world. It is not by chance that the White House is called the Washington Regional Committee! Here, an ally of Vladimir Putin is US presidential candidate Donald Trump, and the part of the nationally oriented American ruling class behind him who does not want to throw America into the furnace of the world permanent revolution.
Judging by the New Year's statements of Moscow, which calmly reacted to the energy blockade of the Crimea, which supported the prolongation of the Minsk agreements, its strategy towards Ukraine at the beginning of the 2016 year remains the same. It was expressed earlier by Vladimir Putin: there will be no war with Ukraine. Moscow continues to bet that the colonial Bandera-American regime will collapse under its own weight. Bandera Krajina must, on her own Svidomo skin, feel all the delights of an Euro-association ...