In Syria, the legendary Russian weapons that destroyed hundreds of tanks are still used.

37
This complex for many years inspired genuine fear on the tankers of the whole world. Still: in the wars that occurred on our planet in the last fifty years, this weapons destroyed thousands of armored vehicles. It's about the famous "Baby". Currently, these anti-tank missiles are used by the opposing sides in Syria.

Anti-tank missile systems (ATGM) "Baby" began to enter service in the 1963 year. In total, more than 300 thousand missiles were fired. It was reported that their cost price during production was only 500 rubles per unit.

Syrian troops were among the first recipients among the countries outside the Warsaw Pact. And, although it is believed that the baptism of these weapons took place in Vietnam, the most massive use of them took place during the 1973 war of the year. By this time, there were specialized anti-tank units armed with these complexes in the Syrian units.

The "little ones" were an unpleasant surprise for the Israeli tankers, they easily hit both the American M-48 and M-60, as well as the modernized Centurions. In total, according to various sources, from 800 to 1000 Israeli were disabled on the Syrian and Egyptian fronts tanks, about half of them - on the account of "Baby". In the tank museum in Kubinka there is an Israeli M-60, the tower of which was pierced by such a missile.
By the way, after this war, Israel, which seized a large number of these anti-tank complexes, adopted them.
After the battles of 1973, "Baby" was used in the wars in Angola and Mozambique, during the conflict of Ethiopia and Somalia. Not without this complex in Kampuchea, and during the border conflict between China and Vietnam.

Iran and Iraq, fighting against each other, also actively used “Babies” in bloody battles. The Iraqi army used these complexes in 1991 and 2003.

Production of these missiles was established in the former Yugoslavia. Not surprisingly, during the civil war, the Yugoslav versions of these weapons were from the opposing sides.

The territory of the former Soviet Union also did not go without these anti-tank systems. On their account - the war in Nagorno-Karabakh, the events in the Donbas.

In Syria, the legendary Russian weapons that destroyed hundreds of tanks are still used.

BMP-1 Ukrainian army with ATGM "Baby"

During the new war in Lebanon in 2006, with the help of the “Babies”, Hezbollah fighters successfully hunted for Israeli infantry.
There are two versions of "Baby": with a manual and semi-automatic control system. The rocket itself is quite compact, its length is just 86 cm. And the weight, depending on the modification, is slightly less or more than 11 kg.

Flight speed, by today's standards, is relatively small - 120 m / s. As a result, the maximum range in 3 km is overcome somewhere in 26 seconds. A big disadvantage is the large dead zone: 400 - 500 m. The armor penetration, depending on the modification, from 400 to more than 500 mm at an angle of 0 °.

The Syrian army used this controlled anti-tank weapon during the civil war in Lebanon. True, basically, not to defeat armored vehicles, which the forces opposing the Syrians had relatively little, but to destroy fortified strongholds and other structures.

In the course of repelling the Israeli invasion of Lebanon 1982 of the year, the use of the “Tiny” was not so successful, since the enemy’s tanks received dynamic protection, which the monoblock combat unit of these missiles could no longer overcome.



In the course of the civil war in Syria, the opposing sides also began to use the ATGM data. Moreover, the storage period of these missiles has long expired, but they are still usable. According to some reports, the militants received part of such anti-tank systems from the countries of the former Yugoslavia and the states that were part of the Warsaw Pact.

Of course, it is very difficult to hit the “Baby” tank equipped with dynamic protection, but it is quite possible to disable the T-55, T-62 or BMP-1 from the opposing sides. In addition, this rocket can destroy sniper nests, fortified positions and other targets. Given that the Syrians, thanks to the help of the USSR, have accumulated thousands of such missiles, we will receive information about their use for a long time.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    27 December 2015 06: 30
    I did not expect it, "Baby" is alive and works wonderfully well.
    1. ICT
      +4
      27 December 2015 08: 34
      Quote: sharp-lad
      works wonderfully.



      I haven’t seen new videos with her for a long time, but a couple of years ago they often flickered


    2. -7
      27 December 2015 19: 54
      I didn’t expect the "Baby" to be a Russian weapon.

      The author, as it should be correct. The country of production of the USSR.
      1. +3
        5 January 2016 11: 57
        Quote: gladcu2
        The author, as it should be correct

        Do you want more correct? if you please - it was developed in the Kolomna Mechanical Engineering Design Bureau - let's say located in central Russia, as well as the modern version of the modernization of previously released complexes - "Malyutka-2".
        Quote: gladcu2
        The country of production of the USSR.

        Somewhat wider - Poland, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, China, Iran, North Korea. laughing


        There are two versions of "Baby": with manual and semi-automatic control system Well, as it were, there are much more versions of the baby, 9M14, 9M14M have manual guidance, 9M14P, 9M14P1 missiles also work in semi-automatic mode - BUT only when used with equipment equipped with guidance equipment, when used in a wearable version, they also use only manual guidance. In addition, there is a variant of factory modernization of previously launched missiles in Malyutka-2 with cumulative, thermobaric or tandem warheads, but judging by the available videos and photos, old 9M14 / 9M14M missiles with manual guidance are used in Syria.
  2. +2
    27 December 2015 07: 08
    What an affectionate name! As they called, so she flew!
    1. +1
      27 December 2015 15: 07
      Here is what I dreamed about today (the holy truth - in shock itself) - to the article! Although it is strange - I have never seen them alive ....
  3. +1
    27 December 2015 08: 06
    There was a place for this "Baby" in modern wars! Truly, a tenacious thing! good
    1. 0
      27 December 2015 10: 27
      So these anti-tank systems modernized.
  4. +1
    27 December 2015 08: 30
    Well, why not. A good, successful and reliable weapon has been in service for decades. And there are many such samples in Russia and abroad.
  5. +4
    27 December 2015 10: 11
    "Babies" became an unpleasant surprise for Israeli tankers, they easily hit both American M-48 and M-60, and modernized "Centurions". In total, according to various sources, from 800 to 1000 Israeli tanks were put out of action on the Syrian and Egyptian fronts, about half of them were on the account of the "Baby".
    We stock up on beer and popcorn. Now experts from Israel will catch up. laughing
    1. ICT
      +3
      27 December 2015 11: 09
      Quote: Termit1309
      out of order from 800 to 1000 Israeli tanks,


      The English journalist, an eyewitness to the battles, wrote: “Thanks to the anti-tank missiles“ Baby ”, a simple Syrian peasant, who had settled in the trench, was equal to a tank,
      with deadly firepower. ”
      1. +7
        27 December 2015 11: 56
        I don’t know how ordinary Syrian peasants were taught, but in the mid-1970s, in the Airborne Forces training in Gaizhunai in Lithuania, on a special simulator "Malyutki" (not in combat, but in almost ideal conditions), drive the "bunny" that depicted the glowing tail of a rocket into the "target" was not an easy thing to do. Although the English journalist knows better.
    2. +5
      30 December 2015 18: 00
      "" Babies "became an unpleasant surprise for Israeli tankers" ///

      And what? It's true. They argue how much is hit, but the fact that
      the Egyptians knocked out the Baby (ATGM fairly large caliber - 125 mm)
      quite a few tanks during counterattacks of Israeli tankers
      against the Egyptians crossing the Suez Canal in 1973.
      The Egyptians formed special anti-tank groups. At the head of each was
      necessarily an officer. They acted boldly and professionally.
  6. +2
    27 December 2015 10: 30
    And what is this talking about? About the power of the Soviet military-industrial complex, the talent of Soviet designers and engineers, the foresight of the leadership.
  7. +1
    27 December 2015 11: 02
    legendary russian weapon
    Maybe still Soviet? let's be more honest
    1. 0
      24 January 2016 12: 32
      Yes, RUSSIAN as if you would not like to! Also, soon jumping up in unison with the Ukrainians ...
  8. +1
    27 December 2015 11: 59
    Actually, why not. Still, this is + to ground forces, and this is now very, very important. The Russian Ministry of Defense undoubtedly gives tremendous support from the air, but this is only half the battle after all. It is necessary to destroy the IG, until they began to explode their own in our homeland. Personally, I do not want to wait for such prospects. I’ll go to Syria as a volunteer if they take me. And there, I will help than I can. I think it will be right.
  9. +2
    27 December 2015 12: 05
    There both Mig21 and Mig23 fly, and Russia let them go under the knife, but it was possible to upgrade
    1. +1
      27 December 2015 12: 34
      And why do we need outdated aircraft at the end of the 80's? Here, the purely 4 generation becomes meat on the battlefield, and even the 3 aircraft of the 50 generation, and even more so.
      1. 0
        27 December 2015 13: 37
        It would be possible to sell, because we had more than a thousand of them. And the modernized instant 23 could have fought with the 4th generation. And so, they just let everything go. In the USA, all the old stuff is stored at the US Air Force Davis-Monten and not only, but we have everything in the trash
        1. +1
          27 December 2015 17: 57
          Those who have money will not buy obviously outdated equipment. Whoever doesn’t - either buys for nothing from the countries of the former ATS, or does not buy at all. And upgrading the MiG-21 Bison costs a little less than the MiG-29, so the choice is clear. In the US, Davis-Montin is partially used for technical cannibalism for flying aircraft, plus they have long storage periods for equipment. So, if you search, both the T-34, IS, and MiG-15 are on the BHVT. Only the quality of storage is naturally worse.
      2. +2
        27 December 2015 20: 04
        Forest

        MiG-25, speed 3000 km / h. World record altitude of 37400 m in 1972. Issued in the amount of 3000 units.

        SR-71 Flight Speed ​​3300 km / h. Issued a half dozen, too lazy to look at wikipedia.

        For an instant-25 3000 ordinary combatant pilots flew. On the SR-71, specially trained pilots with an understudy.

        This is about Soviet technology.

        Quite nothing to himself. Some gliders could be upgraded. Although of course the spare parts base requires the availability of production facilities.
        1. +2
          28 December 2015 12: 09
          Instead of the MiG-25 there is the MiG-31, which is less capricious, has the ability to carry a larger set of weapons and electronics, which can not be delivered with any modernization. The glider is designed for some time of operation. Our MiG-29 is falling apart, what can we say about old cars.
  10. +3
    27 December 2015 13: 07
    At my enterprise that way, 40 years ago, they made batteries for the "Babies", and to this day, hulls float up with batteries. And live more or less (powered). That was the quality.
    1. +2
      27 December 2015 14: 17
      A good and long-lived complex largely due to its simplicity and unreliability, as well as the fact that the ATGM missile could be placed at a distance (albeit not large) from the operator and in cases of "retaliatory strike" his chances of not being hurt increased.
      Until recently, Iran produced a modernized "Baby" called I-RAAD-T with a semi-automatic guidance system and a missile with a tandem warhead.

      1. +2
        28 December 2015 13: 32
        The licensed "Malyutka-2M" was developed in the early 90s, Kolomna.
  11. +1
    27 December 2015 15: 00
    For their time, the Sagers were a great weapon.
  12. +1
    27 December 2015 16: 03
    the Chinese have something similar, but not in the direction of modernization, but in the direction of "collective farm" copying, the video is walking on the internet, I remember even there aiming along the line was)))

    (but modern developments are of course also available)
  13. +11
    27 December 2015 19: 29
    "Baby" in skillful hands is a terrible weapon, accurate and powerful enough. But in the skillful! This manually controlled and rather slow weapon could be "lowered" to the target from above to the bottom. Not like the Javelins, of course, but he himself got into a target tank in the engine compartment from above on a bet. The skill, of course, was atrocious, and piloting a rocket - on autopilot - but if you shoot about a hundred ... most of all, non-standard descents "got" - until you catch it, until you put it in the sight ... was rather weak. The optimal distance is 3 km. At this distance, you can target which part of the tower to hit. Well, at 2 meters you only have a couple of seconds to "catch" the rocket with the joystick and bring it into the target contour, but there you have to do it without a sight - by sight. You won't be able to lean out of the car into the hatch - you can't reach the joystick, but from the remote control it's a nice thing.
    And most importantly, she is not afraid of any electronic warfare. It is controlled by wires, does not give itself out by any nodes, and it is possible to direct it "by eye", without any sight. And if the tank emits a smoke screen, you can hit along the contour or at the intended meeting point - the hit is more likely than the new, automatic ones.
    Personally, I would modernize it, install the simplest video camera, a webcam. True, the projectile rotates, so the image needs to be stabilized, but with such a video camera it would be a cheap and deadly king of the battlefield. For 30 seconds you soar over the field, choosing a target, and you "bite" from above to choose from!
    1. +1
      27 December 2015 20: 10
      Mountain shooter

      Baby, direct fire system. Tank arrow on the thermal imager system will calculate. You’ll still prepare for launch.

      Now relevant system, fired and reeled off. Like an old, good RPG. Well, or something else more modern. When the target is not necessary to follow.

      By the way the question. And the wires do not cling to the bushes?
      1. +5
        27 December 2015 21: 45
        The wires are unwound from the projectile ahead of time, therefore, not tight and the bushes are not a hindrance. If the tank fires a thermal imager at each infantryman and clicks from the cannon, it will click. And more ATGM itself does not betray itself. You sit in a trench with a remote control in your hands, a pipe above the parapet. Starting cable - 50 meters. There is a shell on the container lid, waiting for launch, cold, because of the bushes, nothing "shines" what else is needed. And if he had a TV camera, he would have raised it higher to improve visibility, and a falcon, from above. 120 meters per second is not so little, but on a dive it will be much more. No, the good old "Baby" has proven its worth. He still shoots. In terms of reliability, it is almost RPG-7. It would be turned into a kind of kamikaze drone - cheap and deadly.
        1. +1
          28 December 2015 13: 28
          About the wires. “The first 'impact on the history' of this rocket is connected with the cable. The fact is that at first the thinnest stranded wire was braided from high-quality Chinese silk. However, relations with China have changed, and one could not count on large supplies of strategic raw materials.
          The search for a substitute was feverish, but the solution was found only when at the next meeting. The invincible saw on one of the functionaries of the Central Committee an imported nylon shirt ... Which was immediately requisitioned in favor of the native defense industry. After appropriate tests, a government decree was adopted on the purchase of synthetic fiber production facilities.
          And in Soviet stores, domestic tight-fitting women's tights appeared ... "1960 Maybe a bike.
          1. 0
            28 December 2015 13: 39
            I searched. Indeed, in the late 60s, Soviet industry finally mastered the production of this ladies' accessory - tights began to be produced in Belarus, at the Brest Hosiery Plant
    2. +4
      28 December 2015 01: 32
      In 1982. at the Totsk training ground, in the process of practical firing from guns (being a PVAIU cadet), we were shown the combat launches of "Malyutok" by trained conscripts. They have six months or a year of service behind them. Their goals are real - tanks shot by more than one generation of ATGM operators (from T-34-85 to T-54 or others, sometimes it was difficult to determine). Then it was ATGM! Probably, there were 4-6 launches on targets at a distance of about 500-2000m, everything was right on target. We were brought to see the results - a fresh hole from rust is easy to distinguish. By the way, there were hits from above (I think this is the highest "aerobatics" of the operator! Then he himself made about 30 launches on the simulator, but ... Indeed, it is quite difficult to get into (I never). And then some notion began to appear that we have to do it, but the introductory lessons are over (not our profile) .Therefore, we need to learn the materiel, train on it and we will succeed even on these "oldies".
  14. 0
    28 December 2015 05: 18
    a wonderful racket for the adversary, the main thing is to show army ingenuity and this little thing will again prove itself from the most unexpected side ...
  15. 0
    5 January 2016 11: 30
    A very successful complex turned out, more than once will prove itself.
  16. 0
    6 January 2016 13: 47
    Good stuff. Can anyone have a control panel?
  17. +3
    9 January 2016 21: 48
    Quote: gladcu2
    I didn’t expect the "Baby" to be a Russian weapon.

    The author, as it should be correct. The country of production of the USSR.


    And what .... under the USSR, Martians worked in defense research institutes and factories? Zadolbali these emigrants ... blamed and wailing all Russian and Soviet. In Russian, however. Well, write already in Naglosak. We translate if that.
    1. 0
      10 January 2016 18: 52
      u nasia u chinaa mnaga ochschen russkiy weapon