Media: Iran sends Air Force aircraft to Syria to fight Daesh (ISIS)

141
Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Rai, citing its own sources in military circles, writes that the Iranian Air Force is going to join the strikes against the militants of the so-called Islamic State (DAISH). According to the source of the publication, we are talking about military aircraft, which Iran plans to deploy on one of the airfields in the province of Homs.

Media: Iran sends Air Force aircraft to Syria to fight Daesh (ISIS)


In the same edition it is reported that the first flights in Syria to the aircraft of the Iranian Air Force will be made in conjunction with Russian fighters, attack aircraft and bomber aircraft.

Meanwhile, Vladimir Kozhin, an assistant to the president of Russia for military-technical cooperation, told the press that Russia had begun supplying C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to the Iranian side. TASS quotes Vladimir Kozhin:

Contract in action, deliveries have begun.


As you know, earlier Russia declared its unwillingness to implement the contract for the supply of the C-300 air defense system to Iran, since a resolution was passed against Iran prohibiting it from selling weapon. But the thing is that the resolution forbade selling Tehran offensive weapons, to which C-300 has nothing to do. Therefore, the decision of then-President Dmitry Medvedev to curtail the contract implementation program caused a strong reaction not only in Iran, but also in Russia itself.
141 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +62
    3 December 2015 15: 47
    But we are waiting for these comrades with open arms. I hope they do not let you down.
    1. +12
      3 December 2015 15: 48
      Yeah the Persians will help))
      1. +35
        3 December 2015 15: 49
        Works ANTINATOVSKY ALLIANCE.

        It would also be nice to connect Iraq to this process.
        Three countries, plus Syria itself, is already a fist.
        1. +8
          3 December 2015 15: 54
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          Works ANTINATOVSKY ALLIANCE.

          It would also be nice to connect Iraq to this process.
          Three countries, plus Syria itself, is already a fist.



          It seems like a common focal point is already working in Baghdad.
        2. avt
          +25
          3 December 2015 16: 07
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          Works ANTINATOVSKY ALLIANCE.

          In which EVEN SYMBOLICALLY AS COOKIES, and just one cook, there is not officially ANY CSTO member, especially from those countries practicing Islam for which this is a real threat. Or seriously believe that it will cost? They think that those tons of diplomatic mail that were delivered via Manas, the US isn’t enough for everyone? Of course, the Armenians strained on the border with Turkey, well, there they serve in the Russian Armed Forces on a contract basis.
          1. +14
            3 December 2015 16: 38
            Quote: avt
            None of the CSTO member

            Alas, unfortunately, the CSTO today is only Russia and the countries of the bridgehead. One does not have to wait for any effective effective support measures even from Belarus (a super ally).
            P.E. An anti-NATO alliance (in this region) can be created only with those who have something to lose and who cares.

            Again, what does anti-NATO mean - I mean by this concept, actions that are different from the actions of the Western coalition (more effective actions).

            It would be nice if Iraq also involved its aircraft.
            1. jjj
              +7
              3 December 2015 18: 40
              So they joined the CSTO so that Russia would defend them. Which is generally logical and from a historical point of view
              1. +2
                3 December 2015 19: 25
                Quote: jjj
                So they joined the CSTO so that their Russia defended. Which is generally logical and from a historical point of view

                Cool. And then they join NATO so that America can protect them, if you follow your logic? But in Afghanistan and Iraq, they pretend that they are fighting, not only the Americans, but also a number of NATO countries. I remember in Afghanistan even some prYnts lit up. So isn't it time for our "allies" from the CSTO to subdivide them?
                1. +2
                  3 December 2015 19: 46
                  Quote: Rostov
                  And then they join NATO, so that America defends them, if you follow your logic?

                  Of course. The lion's share of the costs is borne by mattress covers. All these Lithuanians, Bulgaria, etc. needed to vote "FOR".
                  1. +1
                    3 December 2015 20: 05
                    Quote: zennon
                    The lion's share of the expenses are mattresses

                    And in the CSTO, who bears the lion's share of the costs? Really "soyuznichki"?
                    Quote: zennon
                    All these lithuania bulgaria etc. needed to vote "FOR"

                    Well, we have, as you wrote "all these", they can't even say" FOR ".
                    1. +2
                      3 December 2015 23: 12
                      Quote: Rostov
                      And in the CSTO, who bears the lion's share of the costs? Really "soyuznichki"?

                      So what are we arguing about? We completely agree with each other. Putin made a common economic space at the insistence of the military. They said that it would be good for defense. But in fact, heaps of these "buy" floods into the country brought only dirt, drugs At the same time, they did not contribute to the strengthening of the defense in the least. None of them offered a shoulder in Syria. They could at least pay part of the costs of ammunition, fuel and lubricants, etc. No, international terrorism does not concern them. The politics of Minsk surprises. Their citizen died. during the explosion of our plane over Sinai. DAISH took responsibility for the terrorist attack, and dad put his tongue in his ass. At mattress mattresses, their vassals take on at least part of the costs. Russia alone is plastered. "Soyuznichki" are not like a shoulder, they are also a leg to us will be substituted at a difficult moment, and we let them in, allow them to earn and take out a lot of money from the country.
            2. +3
              3 December 2015 19: 47
              and how can Belarus help with the fact that there is no ground operation? There from the fleet there are no more than 10 modernized flashes of 29 and that’s all, and pilots fly by for a couple of hours a year.
              and the rest of the CSTO members did not even show moral solidarity with the Russian Federation, and this is a disturbing and sad fact, we can count on ourselves.
              1. +7
                3 December 2015 23: 24
                Quote: tilovaykrisa
                and how can Belarus help with the fact that there is no ground operation?

                He answered above. To pay part of the costs of the operation. For example, fuels and lubricants. Maybe it was food and some ammunition. I remember the Mongols did not send troops to Europe, but helped as they could. During the four years of the war, 485 thousand horses were delivered to the Soviet Union - "Mongol ". According to other sources, a little more than 500 thousand. At the same time, they were paid off-net for their debts to the USSR. This help was priceless! Mongolia during the same years delivered almost 500 thousand tons of meat to the USSR. 800 thousand half-mongering Mongols, exactly as much as the population of the MPR then, gave us a little less meat than the United States! From the Mongolian steppes the whole strategic war warfare went to our country - wool. Wool is, first of all, soldier's overcoats, without which it is impossible to survive in the trenches of Eastern Europe even in the summer. From the USA 54 thousand tons of wool came to us then, from Mongolia - 64 thousand tons. Every fifth Soviet overcoat in the years 1942-45 was “Mongolian.” Even Mongolia was an important source of leather raw materials and furs. Deliveries of fur coats, fur hats, mittens and felt boots began already in the first military autumn. By November 7, 1941, several Soviet infantry divisions from reserves preparing for a counter-offensive near Moscow were fully equipped with Mongol winter uniforms. This is an almost impoverished, sparsely populated country! They bow low to them! And here is Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan ... Where are they ?!
          2. +11
            3 December 2015 16: 41
            And right, where are our Belarusian and Kazakhstani brothers? Why does no one even in VO ask this question? I would like to read sane analytics on this topic ...
            1. +25
              3 December 2015 16: 49
              They are brothers from the word TAKE .., America will show them a gingerbread and dump everything in kind ...
              1. +2
                3 December 2015 16: 53
                But how everyone gathers in one place, and everyone with weapons and everyone will fight

                Some foreboding is not good.


            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +9
              3 December 2015 16: 59
              Quote: Andrew
              And right, where are our Belarusian and Kazakhstani brothers?

              Well, Kazakhstan is always silent, but Belarus is now vouchers for our holidaymakers in Turkey, and Lukashenko himself speaks to Erdogan in friendship.
              1. -11
                3 December 2015 17: 30
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                and Lukashenko himself is explained in his friendship to Erdogan.

                Maybe you do not need populist statements? negative You still say that they sleep together. It sounds low.
                Belarus does not tear a vest about a superpower, unlike us and the USA.
                1. +10
                  3 December 2015 17: 34
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  Maybe you do not need populist statements?

                  Should I give you a link to the recent statement by Lukashenko, which he made after the downing of Sushka, about great friendship?
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  You still say that they sleep together

                  This is populism!
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  Belarus does not tear a vest about a superpower, unlike us and the USA.

                  What a good Belarus and what a bad Russia. crying
                  1. -6
                    3 December 2015 17: 40
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    What a good Belarus and what a bad Russia.

                    For some reason, people in Belarus live better. But Russia is not bad, no. It's just that we are rarely lucky with kings. It's a shame, but I see that in relation to his people the same Putin before Lukashenko as before China ....
                    P.S. Remember how "ours" squeezed the gas transmission system of Belarus from him. Not so long ago. News releases are still on YouTube. Honestly with an ally?
                    1. +14
                      3 December 2015 17: 59
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      For some reason, people in Belarus live better. But Russia is not bad, no.

                      Well, it would be strange with the corresponding territory (2 by 2 meters) to live worse than Russia.
                      Not having the problems and challenges that Russia has.
                      Being behind Russia is only the status of an ALLIANCE of Russia how many times saved Lukashenko from the development of the orange scenario (and indeed from any possible aggression). In the West, they perfectly understood that there was no sense in rolling the barrel to the Old Man for the hard dispersal of the demonstration, followed by Russia.
                      1. +5
                        3 December 2015 18: 15
                        That's right, but ..
                        Quote: _Vladislav_
                        Not having the problems and challenges that Russia has.

                        They do not have the same resources. Such resources.
                        In the West, they knew perfectly well that to roll a barrel on Old Man for the hard dispersal of the demonstration
                        And there were hard overclocking? Batik has a lot to learn in working with the opposition. He has Gazprom TNT and does not contain Echo Matz. hi
                      2. +1
                        3 December 2015 19: 05
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        And there were hard overclocking? Batik has a lot to learn in working with the opposition. He has Gazprom TNT and does not contain Echo Matz.

                        All this would not have made any sense if he (Old Man) had been accused of tyranny and crimes against humanity, of being undemocratic, and then NATO troops would have been brought in. And here TNT and the ECHO of Moscow and the daredevils with bulk ..... And why? hi
                        Russia, all Russia is my friend.)

                        Believe me, Old Man plays beautifully because he, unlike his Ukrainian colleagues, has such an opportunity. And not because he is a good player.
                    2. +5
                      3 December 2015 19: 05
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      People for some reason live better in Belarus

                      It is always surprising when a person with the flag of the Russian Federation writes on behalf of the Belarusian people. People live there in different ways and to live like in Russia people really plow there. Of course there are positive aspects, but they live there no better, rather differently.
                      Iran probably shouldn’t get involved directly in the war, they are too nervous about it in Israel. It would be better if we were given a military base for a year, it would be real help !!
                    3. +3
                      4 December 2015 00: 26
                      Ingvar 72, dear, go live in Belarus, find out how well people live there, then write. It’s clean there, cranes go around the fields for harvesters, etc., but in the material sense, oh how tough it is. And I’m not saying that it’s bad, living in good does not lead, but you can’t even compare it with Russia. My mother worked all her life, she has a long experience - her pension is almost 2 times the average salary in Belarus, plus all sorts of utility and other benefits, she now lives alone and has about a quarter left from her pension, eats everything she wants and gets all the medicine, and now, he says, he would live and live. I used to help her financially, including, and now only with household chores and gifts, and she regularly gives grandchildren and grandchildren from retirement. Something like this. Go, live with the Old Man, and then I write all sorts of nonsense. And if you go there as a tourist - like in Egypt, the average Russian is there as a millionaire.
                    4. +1
                      4 December 2015 05: 40
                      Quote: Ingvar 72

                      People for some reason live better in Belarus

                      1.Live there no better
                      2. Half of the budget of Belarus is our loans (gifts), subsidies, etc.
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      Putin to Lukashenko as to China ....

                      Yeah lol
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      Honestly so with an ally?

                      And the damned Maskals wanted to "squeeze" the pipe from the Ukrainians.
                      Igor, are you suddenly blind?
                    5. 0
                      4 December 2015 10: 54
                      what nonsense? salaries in factories 8-10 thousand rubles on our money. The standard of living in Belarus is 1.5 times lower than in Russia.
                2. +4
                  3 December 2015 18: 43
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  Belarus does not tear a vest about a superpower, unlike us and the USA.


                  So if the Old Man behaves in such a way, what kind of vest is he for? Only a nightie, very light blue.
          3. +9
            3 December 2015 17: 52
            Quote: avt
            Yes, just one cook, there is not officially ANY CSTO member, especially from those countries practicing Islam for which this is a real threat. Or seriously believe that it will cost?
            It will not cost, avt, this bowl will not blow. But there is no need to compare the dense coalition of NATO with the legacy of perestroika and dashing times. I'm talking about the Collective Security Treaty Organization. In the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the armies of our friendly countries are under our nuclear umbrella and the protection of the airborne forces reserve. In the event of an attack on one of these countries, the Russian paratroopers will be the first to fly and join the battle. But in the case of an attack on Russia, it is not necessary that the Kazakh paratroopers fly to attack the Kuril Islands and enter the battle. Such functions are not required of them. so that they protect their land. And Russia, as the heaviest body, keeps them in the orbit of its politics. Given what changes and cataclysms happened in the post-Soviet space, I consider this alignment to be a good result. Regarding political statements --- yes it would be nice, but then they will be hit by sanctions .. And they have neither oil nor gas. Therefore, this is the situation. Forgive me for that, but it is a given.
            1. avt
              0
              3 December 2015 18: 14
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              But there is no need to compare the dense coalition of NATO with the legacy of perestroika and dashing times. I'm talking about the CSTO.

              No. NO! This is a matter of principle! No one demands direct military action from them. USA has a coalition of 61 states, but how many are fighting ??? and what is the bottom line ???? Sitting vectors are sorting out, shuffling from their multi-vector policy. Since the times of the sailing battleships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, he saved Sultan Mahmud by entering the Sea of ​​Marmara and landing troops, and then - thank you, went to the nafik Happy New Year.
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              .A Russia, as the heaviest body, keeps them in the orbit of their politics.

              No. Naive misconception.
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              .As for political statements --- yes it would be nice, but then they will be hit by sanctions

              Who exactly will hit them with sanctions in a political speech against ISIS ?????? wassat request
            2. 0
              3 December 2015 23: 20
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              but then they will be hit by sanctions .. And they have neither oil nor gas. Therefore, this is the situation. Forgive me for that, but it is a given.

              Think correctly, dear, Putin’s pragmatic, otherwise we can’t be right now, otherwise they will scatter who are now formally with us.
        3. +3
          3 December 2015 16: 33
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          _Vladislav_ Today, 15: 49 ↑
          Works ANTINATOVSKY ALLIANCE.

          It would also be nice to connect Iraq to this process.
          Three countries, plus Syria itself, is already a fist.


          "Katz offers to surrender ..." (c)
          1. EFA
            +5
            3 December 2015 17: 25
            That's probably better;)
        4. +2
          3 December 2015 16: 43
          It is necessary that the air defense of Syria should work, so that only the planes of those countries that have been given the go-ahead by the government of Syria can cross the border. Without this, "surprises" are possible.
          1. +6
            3 December 2015 17: 00
            Quote: TVM - 75
            It is necessary to earn Syrian air defense

            To our great regret, the air defense of Syria practically "died" - a large number of stationary posts of air defense missile systems and radars were destroyed. Many air defense servicemen went to fight the terrorists in the infantry as ordinary soldiers.
        5. +9
          3 December 2015 16: 57
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          Three countries, plus Syria itself, is already a fist.

          Quote: shooter18
          Yeah the Persians will help))

          Quote: venaya
          I hope they do not let you down.

          No, well, I understand the approval that Iran will join, it’s understandable, but there’s one thing. Soon there will be a traffic jam in the sky of Syria, how many countries each of which has its own interests. The Syrian funnel of warriors draws more and more more forces and countries. Question, how will it all end ???
          We don’t know with what orders the NATO planes will fly, but to provoke in such a heap a small air collision, like two fingers ... to wet. Then it will follow as if by notes.
          1. +2
            3 December 2015 17: 18
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            We don’t know with what orders the NATO planes will fly, but to provoke in such a heap a small air collision, like two fingers ... to wet. Then it will follow as if by notes.

            With whatever orders NATO members did not fly there, WE need allies. And not such as Belarus or Kazakhstan (which if anything, as they say: "we will stand shoulder to shoulder if necessary"), but such as Iran, Iraq, Syria (not in word, but in deed). The set is small, but still a set (in this region, respectively).

            Unfortunately, Iraq is not yet active enough, but I think it is a matter of time.
            Hypothetical, for NATO, it is not very easy to deal with Russia, but it is even more difficult to deal with it if it has allies.

            As I said earlier, a combination of superiority is a belt consisting of Syria, Iraq, Iran + Russia's capabilities. And that is doable.
            1. +5
              3 December 2015 17: 37
              Quote: _Vladislav_

              As I said earlier, a combination of superiority is a belt consisting of Syria, Iraq, Iran + Russia's capabilities. And it is feasible

              There is no longer any belt, there is no longer a civilian warrior in Syria who would not have sponsored the parties. The war dragged on and the sponsors of Russia (Assad) -USA (ISIS and others) got down to business Now the warrior takes on a completely different character with an incomprehensible end to everyone.
              1. +2
                3 December 2015 17: 46
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Now the warrior takes on a completely different character with an incomprehensible end to everyone.

                A little bit of analysts all over the world miscalculated, for a couple of thousand kilometers. They all assumed that something similar would happen in the Donbass, and it happened in Syria.
                1. +2
                  3 December 2015 18: 55
                  Quote: _Vladislav_
                  They all assumed
                  Analysts speculate, but GDP disposes.
              2. +2
                3 December 2015 17: 55
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Now the warrior takes on a completely different character with an incomprehensible end to everyone

                The end will be one for ISIS (Daesh). Everyone has already understood this, therefore the French, British, Americans have become more active. The goal is also obvious - to take part in the post-war division of the "oil pie". Assad will certainly not be able to move them. Russia and Iran will not allow. But to get hold of some sort of autonomy, for example, for the Kurds, it's easy.
        6. +6
          3 December 2015 16: 58
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          Works ANTINATOVSKY ALLIANCE.

          It would also be nice to connect Iraq to this process.
          Three countries, plus Syria itself, is already a fist.

          God forbid. This only saddens one moment. That our CSTO allies do not itch. It seems like allies.
          Armenia offered bases and support, and even then, there was more fierce hatred for the Turks.
          1. +3
            3 December 2015 17: 19
            Quote: NEXUS
            That our CSTO allies do not itch. Like allies.

            Well, Armenia is understandable, although they survive at our expense. Belarus has no money, they also live at our expense. Kazakhstan, I don’t know. Who else is there? Be that as it may, we still have to solve all the problems.
            1. 0
              3 December 2015 17: 36
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Belarus has no money, they also live at our expense

              For yours especially. Sanya, it’s good to drive a blizzard, if Belarus has Russia, then no more than Ukraine. This is at the moment, and in numbers. No one has canceled the payment for transit. And gas discounts are not so big when compared with the price of gas to Germany.
              But if you think about it, is there such a big price for an ally on the western border?
              1. 0
                3 December 2015 18: 50
                Ingvar, what a fierce mastrubal passion for Old Man? Maybe you don’t need to do that? We are not psychiatrists or sexopathologists.
                1. 0
                  4 December 2015 12: 19
                  Quote: Tatarus
                  Ingvar, what a fierce mastrubal passion for Old Man?
                  There is nothing to drive what you do not know. Romanov won half the budget of Belarus out of pocket. laughing
                  Quote: Tatarus
                  We are not psychiatrists or sexopathologists.

                  The patients? belay Freud Do you have a handbook?
              2. +2
                3 December 2015 19: 03
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Is there such a big price for an ally
                An ally for money is not completely reliable, not even completely reliable, given the Fed prints money.
              3. 0
                4 December 2015 00: 33
                Belarus without Russia will be blown away instantly, either to go to our allies or repair the toilets in Poland (the Poles themselves are much higher - they will repair the toilet in London)
              4. 0
                4 December 2015 05: 43
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                For yours especially. Sanya, it’s good to drive a blizzard, if Belarus has Russia, then no more than Ukraine

                Half of the budget is subsidized from Russia.
            2. +7
              3 December 2015 18: 37
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Kazakhstan, I don’t know.

              I can tell you. It is the policy of the viewer to sit like a monkey on a palm tree when the lions are fighting on the ground. But provided that if Kazakhstan is attacked, then Russia will not go anywhere and will help us.
              Recently, a friend graduated from a Kazakh academy called the National Defense University. When I came to help him write his dissertation, I saw a training map in which Russia was the aggressor, and Kazakhstan was repelling the attack. And such training and combat tasks are posed to almost all students. I would not be surprised if this is also present in real combat documents. Kazakhstan, of course, is not a "wolf in sheep's clothing", but it is for sure a rat.
          2. +5
            3 December 2015 18: 21
            Quote: NEXUS
            That our CSTO allies do not itch. Like allies.
            Armenia offered bases and support, and even then, there was more fierce hatred for the Turks.
            And what claims to the Armenians ..? You yourself say that .. Armenia offered bases and support .. Should they send an expeditionary force to the Middle East? Will they send it, and who will hang over its Karabakh divisions and squadrons? Army General Vasya Pupkin ? A need to hang, because. In recent years, the Russian Federation has supplied Azerbaijan and the S-300 with the latest tanks and a bunch of other goodies. Whatever you say, business deals were faultless in their profitability, but here's the thing ... now the Armenians can’t remove a single battalion from the demarcation line. in this situation, form an expeditionary battalion for Syria or strike from all barrels along the Turkish border. They will strike and send when the enemy trample on their land. And they have no more resources. They keep the border --- fighters from both sides die on the border every week, very tense atmosphere.
        7. +1
          3 December 2015 17: 26
          It would also be nice to connect Iraq to this process.
          The affairs of the Iraqis are small, the IS controls a hefty piece of this country, plus the Kurds in the most oil-bearing regions are essentially autonomous from the center and are closely supported by American, English and German instructors. Free Kurds ... this is where NATO puts its air strikes to support the actions of the ground army Iraqi Kurdistan and its special forces units (by force to a reinforced company).
        8. +2
          3 December 2015 17: 33
          This is what they write.

          http://warfiles.ru/show-101822-v-siriyu-perebrasyvayut-120-rossiyskih-samoletov-
          russkie-budut-obsluzhivat-iranskie-eskadrili.html
          1. +2
            3 December 2015 17: 38
            Quote: Sega66
            This is what they write.

            Now a lot of what they write.
          2. 0
            3 December 2015 17: 41
            Quote: Sega66
            This is what they write.

            http://warfiles.ru/show-101822-v-siriyu-perebrasyvayut-120-rossiyskih-samoletov-

            russkie-budut-obsluzhivat-iranskie-eskadrili.html


            Well .... if true - it’s very positive.
        9. +1
          3 December 2015 18: 48
          This is the right move of the United States and everyone else should see the Russian coalition in action!
        10. +1
          3 December 2015 19: 02
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          It would also be nice to connect Iraq to this process.
          Three countries, plus Syria itself, is already a fist.

          Woke up? Iraq has long fought with Isis.
        11. +1
          3 December 2015 19: 57
          I just don’t understand why Iran cannot work from its air bases. Or is it to show that in the event of a conflict with the Turks in Syria, we will not be alone?
      2. +5
        3 December 2015 16: 12
        And what do you dislike about the Persians.
        1. avt
          +6
          3 December 2015 16: 32
          Quote: Vadim237
          And what do you dislike about the Persians.

          We like everything, because it once again confirms the rule that Alexander III brought out - "Russia has two allies, its Army and Navy, all the rest will take up arms against us at the first opportunity", but with spoons, if everything goes well, come running will not forget .And the Persians ... at the beginning of the conflict, they already answered our requests - "let's go exactly as long as Russia is ready to go," they keep their word on the campaign, well, they also beat off their interest - not without this. They did not move to simply designate that we are not at war with the Sunni world, just not even to fight - to designate and knock out the trump card that they were spinning against us, well, for the connection with Iran, they tried to sew a case. Well, nothing - we will cope with prayer.
          1. +1
            3 December 2015 17: 45
            Quote: avt
            Well, never mind - we’ll manage to pray.

            The Togliatti prayed and drove off. wink
      3. +3
        3 December 2015 16: 27
        Quote: shooter18
        Yeah the Persians will help))

        At this historical moment, we are in the same boat.
    2. +14
      3 December 2015 15: 49
      Quote: venaya
      But we are waiting for these comrades with open arms.

      Why not fly now, when we set up air defense systems in Syria.
      1. +2
        3 December 2015 15: 51
        At least the task of the Americans to destroy the infrastructure of Syria will be complicated
    3. Darkoff
      +8
      3 December 2015 15: 54
      If only their plane was not shot down by anyone. For example, Israel is near its border.
      Persians will not indulge in sanctions.
    4. +2
      3 December 2015 15: 56
      It is necessary to deliver there dozens of three Escanders there, so that it is more convincing.
    5. Tor5
      -1
      3 December 2015 15: 56
      Well done, our traditional friend!
      1. +1
        3 December 2015 16: 09
        Quote: Tor5
        Well done, our traditional friend!



        Not a friend but a partner.
        1. +1
          3 December 2015 18: 53
          Quote: Denis Obukhov
          Not a friend but a partner.


          Well, yes ... not a girl, but an object. Not a favorite, but a subject
    6. +12
      3 December 2015 16: 04
      Quote: venaya
      But we are waiting for these comrades with open arms. I hope they do not let you down.

      Persians will at least bomb what they need and fight with whom they need.
    7. +6
      3 December 2015 16: 11
      The best scenario is if the Iranians assume the functions of the ground forces. The Syrian army has already been exhausted and it does not have enough strength to carry out large-scale offensive operations. Well, our task is to equip the Syrian air defense systems with air defense systems (S-300 for example) as soon as possible, calmly continue to observe how glorious US aces and their allies will feel Syrian sky.
    8. 0
      3 December 2015 21: 09
      ours in syria
    9. 0
      3 December 2015 21: 10
      our guys in the area of ​​Palmyra bully
      1. 0
        4 December 2015 01: 56
        Apparently from the MTR ...
    10. -1
      3 December 2015 23: 39
      In my opinion, the article is similar to a fiction published in the yellow press. What kind of aircraft is Iran ready to fly in Syria? They for their needs need to change the rarity and buy new samples after the sanctions. In addition, for the Russian Federation, repairing and servicing equipment of one kind is more efficient. Tugging the Iranian Air Force is not very effective. America and Israel will immediately shout that the new coalition of the Russian Federation and Iran no longer has a desire to use precision weapons. Militants fear the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, whom Iran is not in a hurry to send to Syria in the right quantity, trying to work not directly. Now, in addition to what is happening in Syria, Iraq is important, both for the United States and for the Russian Federation with Iran.
    11. +2
      4 December 2015 09: 24
      Quote: venaya
      But we are waiting for these comrades with open arms. I hope they do not let you down.



      Don't overdo it with hugs. After the end of the "Syrian epic", Iran will want to be the strongest in the region. And this is not quite part of Russia's plans.
  2. +4
    3 December 2015 15: 48
    In the same edition it is reported that the first flights in Syria to the aircraft of the Iranian Air Force will be made in conjunction with Russian fighters, attack aircraft and bomber aircraft.



    Well, that help arrives, SSHA will definitely write in boiling water.
    1. +3
      3 December 2015 15: 55
      Quote: cniza
      In the same edition it is reported that the first flights in Syria to the aircraft of the Iranian Air Force will be made in conjunction with Russian fighters, attack aircraft and bomber aircraft.

      Well, that help arrives, SSHA will definitely write in boiling water.

      From what? Ancient "Phantoms", F-5 and F-14, the very first MiG-29? The United States does not stop the S-400 and Su-27/30 deployed in Syria, what will they scare the Iranian planes that survived the Iran-Iraq war?
      1. +7
        3 December 2015 16: 03
        Their aircraft are not particularly needed (our Su 24 is also not the first freshness), the very fact of more active participation.
        1. +5
          3 December 2015 16: 14
          Iran's strike aircraft consists of Soviet-made aircraft. These are 34 Su-24 bombers, 37 Su-22 attack aircraft (all are in storage pending modernization) and 13 Su-25. All Su-25 are part of the Air Force KSIR.http: //topwar.ru/54800-armiya-irana-samaya-eklektichnaya-v-mire-podrobn


          ee-http-ruspltru-world-armiya-irana-samaya-eklektichnaya-v-mire-11400html.html
          Let them join, Russia will certainly help with spare parts, there will be no extra bombs on the head of DAISH militants.
      2. +1
        3 December 2015 18: 55
        Quote: 0255
        US does not stop placed in Syria S-400 and Su-27/30


        Stop it. And if you think and weigh, you will understand why you are wrong.
      3. +1
        3 December 2015 19: 47
        Quote: 0255
        What scare them the Iranian planes that survived the Iran-Iraq war?

        Ancient Iranian planes will help us morethan no planes at all from our "allies" in the CSTO.
        1. 0
          3 December 2015 19: 53
          Quote: Rostov
          Quote: 0255
          What scare them the Iranian planes that survived the Iran-Iraq war?

          Ancient Iranian planes will help us morethan no planes at all from our "allies" in the CSTO.

          Here you are right too sad
    2. +1
      3 December 2015 15: 55
      Well, that help arrives, SSHA will definitely write in boiling water.

      I’m still curious what Israel will say :)
      1. +4
        3 December 2015 16: 01
        ? And, what he has to say, the question here is not in Israel - you can’t envy the poor people behind the fence, but what Saudis and Qatar will answer! This is an abomination, the main opponents of Iran and Russia at the moment, who sponsored a wave of Shiite killings in Kenya and Bangladesh?
      2. +4
        3 December 2015 16: 36
        Quote: serg1970
        serg1970 Today, 15: 55 ↑
        Well, that help arrives, SSHA will definitely write in boiling water.
        I’m still curious what Israel will say :)


        Who will ask him in this situation ... the Jews now silently observe only remains ...
        1. +4
          3 December 2015 18: 04
          Quote: 341712


          Who will ask him in this situation ... the Jews now silently observe only remains ...

          as I understand it, the Iranians through the deputy National High School of Russia, which we had yesterday and the day before yesterday, were instructed not to approach closer than 50 km to our borders. And let them fly.
      3. avt
        +4
        3 December 2015 16: 59
        Quote: serg1970
        I’m still curious what Israel will say :)

        So, I’ve already noted more than once - the US has wound up so that for the first time practically came into contact between the Tsakhal and the IRGC, and now the Iranian Air Force. That is, in fact the referee only Russia request one has only to turn away, or to think - bosom friends cling to each other in Adam's apple.
        Quote: 341712
        Who will ask him in this situation ...

        No. A huge delusion bordering on stupidity !!! No. This is a serious topic! Israel by military power is a key player in the region and uses power in its interests without delay and troubles on any polites! You have forgotten that it’s a real nuclear state that DOES NOT SIGN a single convention on nuclear weapons in terms of proliferation and use, but like India.
        1. 0
          3 December 2015 17: 20
          Let the Iranians drop the infantry, it will be more useful. As the course of the operation shows, everything on the ground is decided by the "Kalash" and not by cruise missiles.
  3. bad
    +3
    3 December 2015 15: 49
    In the same edition it is reported that the first flights in Syria to the aircraft of the Iranian Air Force will be made in conjunction with Russian fighters, attack aircraft and bomber aircraft.
    this is more like a coalition ... although the Iranians are cunning ... they were waiting for us to deploy air defense ... laughing
  4. +4
    3 December 2015 15: 49
    this is already good. Iran is consolidating as our ally. Interaction is being established in the air and a powerful air defense system is being deployed in two countries. NATO will now do the same, but in quantitative terms, the advantage is still in our direction. Now the main thing on earth is not to slow down. Well, continue to work with Iraq and the Kurds ...
  5. +4
    3 December 2015 15: 49
    Therefore, the decision of the then president Dmitry Medvedev to curtail the contract execution program caused a stormy reaction not only in Iran, but also in Russia itself
    Yes, I don’t remember a single popular decision of Medvedev ... In my opinion, he is not in his place .... It would be nice if he himself understood this ...
    1. +5
      3 December 2015 15: 52
      It’s sometimes impossible to understand him even now as prime minister. It seems to be time for him to relax.
      1. 0
        3 December 2015 15: 58
        The president doesn’t think so, maybe he knows better from above?
        1. +1
          3 December 2015 16: 11
          Quote: lis-ik
          The president doesn’t think so, maybe he knows better from above?

          Maybe better. Or maybe they trust Medvedev to voice unpopular decisions ... Who knows ...
    2. +3
      3 December 2015 16: 26
      Medvedev and understand these are mutually exclusive concepts))) although there is no complete certainty that this was his initiative, maybe this is a mistake or a maneuver of GDP?
    3. +1
      3 December 2015 16: 48
      Do you seriously think that he made decisions without the knowledge and approval of the prime minister?
    4. +3
      3 December 2015 17: 07
      Quote: Roman1970
      Yes, I don’t remember a single popular decision of Medvedev ... In my opinion, he is not in his place .... It would be nice if he himself understood this ...

      You, colleague, about the LADY, think too well, in his "iPhone" the "understood" function is completely absent. laughing
      But you can’t remember it, at least one popular solution, for DAMA didn’t have, not only popular, just competent solutions, not a single one.
      Something like that, colleague. hi
    5. 0
      3 December 2015 19: 10
      In my opinion, he is not in his place .... It would be nice if he himself understood this ...

      But what's the difference in whose place he is?
      The main place is good!
  6. +3
    3 December 2015 15: 53
    Brotherhood in arms is planned, that's good!
  7. dyksi
    +1
    3 December 2015 15: 54
    If this is true, then it’s good, we need allies in Syria, the Westerners, so that they don’t especially flirt there, it is generally advisable to gradually squeeze them out of it, otherwise the communications of the cities will bomb, and not ISIS.
  8. +4
    3 December 2015 15: 55
    With friends is always more fun, even in battle ..
  9. +3
    3 December 2015 15: 55
    Exactly. And the porridge is brewing steeper and steeper. Iranian pilots shoulder to shoulder with ours ... I can’t even believe it.
  10. +2
    3 December 2015 16: 03
    Damn, where all this darkness of motley aviation finds so many goals there? Everyone flies over poor Syria without a bottle (С-400) can’t figure it out ... laughing
  11. +1
    3 December 2015 16: 05
    Well, let them fly. We need allies.
  12. +5
    3 December 2015 16: 05
    This is a whistle.

    But yesterday: The British parliament has authorized airstrikes on the positions of militants of the Islamic State terrorist group in Syria.

    And the Germans there too.

    We have fun merrily celebrate the new year.
    1. +3
      3 December 2015 16: 15
      Still, the Chinese would fly there and Syria will turn into the most interesting country for bombing for the Air Force of the whole world.
    2. +1
      3 December 2015 18: 04
      Did the Johns and Hans really smell something? Are they afraid of not having time to divide the Syrian-Iraqi "pie"? Or because of a puddle, the Fass command came in? But what about the svidomye - again barked out of place? Damn, some questions!
  13. +2
    3 December 2015 16: 06
    If everything goes well, which I really want to believe in, a coalition to fight gangs is gradually gathering! This was what we had to start from the beginning. If only everything would have ended just as beautifully as a victory. But it did not flow to other countries of the region, to Libya and beyond ..
  14. +2
    3 December 2015 16: 07
    Everyone is hammering Isil. Only someone is fighting for real, and someone is pretending. In this case, the Iranian Air Force is desirable allies, not to mention experience.
    1. +2
      3 December 2015 16: 22
      Here, it’s quite possible that the main thing is not the quantity and quality of airplanes (while Iran has a rather low one since the fleet is hopelessly outdated), namely, its participation on the side of our country in the coalition that we formed. And the fact that Iran supported the LAW GOVERNMENT of Assad and not puppets of the West from the FSA.
      And as for Israel, it has long been clear that the destruction of Syria is beneficial to him (all the more so now he pumps oil cheaply from Turkey to buy it from terrorists), the chaos in the region is beneficial to him, death and destruction are beneficial to him, because he makes money from it.
      1. +1
        3 December 2015 16: 48
        Syria’s fleet is also not new, at least you can plan joint flights, although it’s difficult, but you can try to achieve results.
        1. 0
          3 December 2015 17: 13
          Quote: Alexander 3
          Syria’s fleet is also not new, at least you can plan joint flights, although it’s difficult, but you can try to achieve results.

          Indeed, both our country and Iran and Syria and all sane forces will undoubtedly try to achieve the main result, and the result is the defeat of terrorism.
      2. +3
        3 December 2015 17: 01
        Quote: quilted jacket
        What about Israel a long time ago

        Well, what a padded jacket and does not write in koment Israel is a waste day.
        1. +5
          3 December 2015 17: 05
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Well, what a padded jacket and does not write in koment Israel is a waste day

          What's the problem? After all, Israel is located in the Middle East near Syria and this is directly related to it.
          1. +4
            3 December 2015 17: 55
            Quote: quilted jacket
            After all, Israel is in the Middle East near Syria

            And in a state of war.
            1. +3
              3 December 2015 18: 22
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              And in a state of war.

              By the way, in the main "fighter for democracy" Israel, they were already alarmed and "wept" apparently worried that their protégé terrorists from Al-Nusra would offend lol
              Defense Minister Moshe (Boogie) Ya'alon promised to show "zero tolerance" for airspace violations in the Golan Heights.
              http://cursorinfo.co.il/news/novosti1/2015/12/03/ministr-oboroni-poobeshal-nulev

              uyu-terpimost-k-vrazheskim-samoletam-nad-golanami /
  15. +1
    3 December 2015 16: 11
    As they say: may Allah keep them - so it seems?
    1. +1
      3 December 2015 16: 21
      Allah is one - and great, but the prophets of the Iranians - Shiites -
      others. Because of this, the bloody massacre of the Sunni-Shiite war is boiling.

      IS and was formed in 2008 "in protest" from the fact that they came to power in Iraq
      Shiites. And then there’s Shiite Iran with planes ... This is how to splash into the fire
      gas to put it out.
      1. +3
        3 December 2015 17: 51
        "but the prophets of the Iranians - Shiites -
        others. "
        This is already something new !!) Is it possible for more details? And who are they in the prophets?
      2. +4
        3 December 2015 18: 00
        Quote: voyaka uh
        IS and was formed in 2008 "in protest" from the fact that in Iraq came to power
        Shiites.

        Isn't that funny to you yourself? Al-Qaeda also appeared in protest? And what did your "beloved" Hamas come from, you see, also in protest, against Israel's seizure of the Palestinian territories? I don't put a minus, otherwise some of your people have a phobia, they gutar as if I minus, seeing the Israeli flag lol . Probably ill what crying But nothing, in Israel, good medicine will be treated. Yes
        1. 0
          3 December 2015 23: 42
          Quote: Victor-M
          some of your people have a phobia, they’re walking like I’m minus, seeing the Israeli flag. Probably ill

          Oh, and even a Jew sent me in PM that people are talking about me the same way as about you. I wanted to answer him, but by then they had already banned him. crying
      3. avt
        +1
        3 December 2015 18: 30
        Quote: voyaka uh
        IS and was formed in 2008 "in protest" from the fact that they came to power in Iraq

        wassat Yah !? And Baghdadi became such by name and influence immediately after leaving American prison, well, as many Islamist leaders from Guantanamo have been released. It’s not prisons, but West Point branches! laughing And to blame .... Shiites! LwassatAnd did they come to power? Or maybe they put them in Baghdad behind a fence in the Green Zone? Don't you want to refresh the events there in dynamics after the invasion and capture of Baghdad by the USA?
        Quote: voyaka uh
        And then there’s Shiite Iran with planes ... This is how to splash into the fire
        gas to put it out.

        That's what I’ve been talking about for a long time
        Quote: 3officer
        - The US has enticed so that for the first time practically entered into contact between Tsahal and the IRGC, and now also the Iranian Air Force

        In fact, "fighting" with the Shiite arc "USA CREATED IT! And in this version, the next move is the "Turkic spring", well, according to the theory of Comrade Trotsky about permanent revolution, whose fans really rule from overseas. And in this case, for them in the State Department, Israel is a suitcase without a handle. What they are timidly voicing so far For example, the "peacemaker" Nobel Khuseynovich has already declared the need to bring Israel into the 1968 borders. It is impossible to understand this otherwise than an invitation to self-destruct. So the Levant can actually boil even steeper and sharper ... with a nuclear seasoning.
  16. +3
    3 December 2015 16: 14
    So what is it? The Germans on their "Tornado" could not fly, and the Iranians on their lame filly did they come? Original!
  17. +1
    3 December 2015 16: 16
    Quote: triglav
    Well, let them fly. We need allies.

    Well, it’s just not clear that the Persians could bomb terrorists from the territory of northern Iraq. There are also oil refining targets, and towers and tanks on the Iraqi-Turkish border. Yes, and there are plenty of military targets. Why send aviation to Syria now you need to provide there. We would smash from the West Persians from the East. hi
    1. +2
      3 December 2015 16: 31
      Quote: fa2998
      Well, it’s just not clear, the Persians could bomb terrorists from the territory of northern Iraq.

      In Iraq they bombed there more than once they shot their planes. But all the same, the deployment of their Air Force in Syria is more a step in supporting our country and Assad. Moreover, their intelligence tools are very limited in comparison with ours, and here we will represent them.
    2. +1
      3 December 2015 16: 57
      The big difference is that in Syria ours will give out bombs and they will do maintenance, or maybe upgrade something, and all this, of course, without payment, which I, without any irony and sarcasm, am glad ... hi
  18. +1
    3 December 2015 16: 17
    Iran will be much more useless if it sends additional forces to the IRGC and the regular army to the east of northeast Syria.
  19. 0
    3 December 2015 16: 22
    Are you planning a big batch?
    1. +3
      3 December 2015 17: 02
      Quote: vitaliy.rnd
      Are you planning a big batch?

      No, the maximum within planet Earth.
      1. 0
        3 December 2015 17: 19
        It would be nice if only Turkey were treated.
  20. 0
    3 December 2015 16: 43
    Someone will tell you, and China thinks to act, something is not heard, even moral support I do not remember ....
    1. +2
      3 December 2015 17: 53
      Sitting by the river, waiting for the corpse)
  21. +2
    3 December 2015 17: 00
    "Everything is confused in the Oblonskys' house."
    Russia really needs to prohibit the flight in the airspace of the ATS of all small shaves, the USA, etc. etc. There really should fly in addition to the Russian Aerospace Forces Air Force Iran Air Force SAA.
    1. +2
      3 December 2015 17: 03
      Quote: Mig-31
      There really should fly in addition to the Russian Aerospace Forces Air Force Iran Air Force SAA.

      It is reported that about twenty Iranian Air Force combat aircraft are relocated to the Tiyas airbase, located in the desert between Homs and Palmyra. Earlier, military specialists and engineers arrived at this air base, who partially restored the infrastructure of the military airfield.
      In addition, search and rescue squads of the Russian Aerospace Forces on Mi-8AMTSh and Mi-24P helicopters were deployed at the Tiyas airfield.
      In the coming days, the Iranian contingent will already be able to begin carrying out combat missions to escort and cover Russian bombers in the sky over Syria and launch attacks on terrorist positions.
      http://military-informant.com/airforca/iran-perebrosil-v-siriyu-okolo-dvadtsati-
      boevyih-samoletov.html
      1. 0
        3 December 2015 17: 09
        Quote: quilted jacket
        In the coming days, the Iranian contingent will be able to begin performing sorties to escort and cover Russian bombers in the sky over Syria

        We will have strong photos of our TU-95, accompanied by the Iranian F-14, now there will be now SU-24, SU-25, SU-34 with a similar escort.
      2. 0
        3 December 2015 17: 48
        It is reported that about twenty Iranian Air Force combat aircraft are relocated to the Tiyas air base, located in the desert between Homs and Palmyra. Our, as I understand it, will not be able to cover all directions. Does the division of labor begin?
  22. +1
    3 December 2015 17: 04
    good news. if it is confirmed that the Syrians received the 300th systems and that it will be possible to fly only by agreement with the Syrian side, then it will be just wonderful.
  23. +1
    3 December 2015 17: 20
    It was born in my head suddenly, to music from Indian cinema based on the immortal song "Jimmy, Jimmy, ayy yayay yayay!":

    Daish, daish! daish daish!
    daish.dayish! daish, daish!
    Milk America
    And you milk Turkey.

    But too played too
    Suck it in Russia
    And suck at Syria,
    And suck Iran.

    Daish daish! bad boy!
    Daish daish boy bad boy!
    We will squeeze out five hundredth
    On Sir Syri's pimple!

    Ah daish daish!
  24. +1
    3 December 2015 17: 23
    I think it’s easier - we’ll have enough experience, then it will be handy in Iraq.
    In other words, this is assistance to Iran from Russia and Syria, and not vice versa.
  25. +5
    3 December 2015 17: 23
    Most importantly, Iran believed us and respects us.The first flights in Syria, the Iranian Air Force planes will make together with Russian fighters, attack aircraft and bombers. And then after we didn’t deliver C-300 to them, the sediment remained. It was a shame for ours. Given the psychology of the eastern man, they forgave us and trust us. Regarding Iran, this is very good.
    1. +3
      3 December 2015 17: 33
      Quote: avva2012
      And then after we didn’t deliver the S-300 to them, the sediment remained. I was ashamed of ours.

      So it’s kind of already started?
      Deliveries of S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran have already begun, said Vladimir Kozhin, assistant to the president of Russia for military-technical cooperation (MTC).
      http://vz.ru/news/2015/12/3/781689.html
      It was reported that Iran will receive systems in the S-300PMU-2 version
      http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/2495603
      1. +2
        3 December 2015 17: 44
        Well, that's relieved.
    2. 0
      3 December 2015 18: 48
      Honestly, Iran is Turkey.
      He does not respect anyone except himself.
      A year ago, the Turks were our best friends who supposedly help break through the sanctions blockade and furnish everything with the South Stream.

      But how did it turn around ...

      And so in Turkey with all of them they threw our enemies as well as us.

      This is my humble opinion based on my vision of history.
  26. +1
    3 December 2015 17: 28
    Quote: venaya
    But we are waiting for these comrades with open arms. I hope they do not let you down.

    All came to the aid of the French, Germans, Saxons, Yankees in the presence of these assistants, I sincerely fear the possibility of a setup from the "Partners". provoke an air defense complex to work on the target, and here an ally is in the line of fire. I feel the "Partners" are up to something
  27. +1
    3 December 2015 17: 35
    Quote: subbtin.725
    Quote: shooter18
    Yeah the Persians will help))

    At this historical moment, we are in the same boat.


    I agree, I agree. But we are actively rowing like a slave in the galleys, and the Iranians climbed onto our shoulders and spreading our arms outstretched, they actively convince us that they are a sail.
    1. +2
      3 December 2015 17: 49
      Quote: Signifer
      But we are actively rowing like a slave in the galleys, and the Iranians climbed onto our shoulders and spreading our arms outstretched, they actively convince us that they are a sail.

      Nonsense, the Iranians have long and actively fought in Syria and Iraq and Yemen against terrorism, but who really "sail" is the United States, the EU, Israel, CA, Turkey and some other "figures" who shout out how good they are and how they are against terrorism and themselves from under the counter help them with weapons and money to buy from them oil and so on.
    2. Darkoff
      0
      3 December 2015 18: 18
      To be honest, everyone climbed. All strive to cling.
      But, on the other hand, this is a sign of the imminent end of Daesh.
    3. 0
      3 December 2015 20: 08
      Quote: Signifer
      we are actively rowing like a slave in the galleys, and the Iranians climbed onto our shoulders
      If the Iranians had been earlier than covering up their wives, children and the elderly, they, I think, would have fought there before us. But you row, excuse me for distracting. wink
  28. 0
    3 December 2015 18: 43
    Quote: DarkOFF
    If only their plane was not shot down by anyone. For example, Israel is near its border.
    Persians will not indulge in sanctions.


    What will they do interestingly? Put the remains of their decrepit Air Force on the Israeli border? As if this did not result in the bombing of the territory of Syria with the fuselages of Iranian aircraft.
    Although it seems to us from this worse. Maybe the Persians then we have planes and weapons to buy them.
    1. -1
      3 December 2015 19: 00
      Quote: Abrekkos
      What will they do interestingly?

      They will make their feasible contribution to the fight against terrorism, because, as you know, Iran and Hezbollah are irreconcilable enemies of terror, in contrast to Israel, for example, which has already sent representatives to Turkey to agree on how it would be better to support Daesh, Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda together with Erdogan and other fanatics and bandits, and possibly how to shoot down planes and shell those who are fighting this evil.
      The representative of the Israeli Foreign Ministry for the first time since 2010 paid an official visit to Turkey
      Aviv Shir-On, deputy director general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry, head of the European countries department, visited Turkey a few days ago, where he met with senior representatives of the foreign ministry and members of parliament.
      http://newsru.co.il/mideast/03dec2015/mid_204.html

      Clearly, there is already an open cobbling together of the Israel-Turkey alliance.
      1. +1
        3 December 2015 19: 20
        Quote: quilted jacket
        Contribute to the fight against terrorism

        This is yes.
        But I meant that the Iranian Air Force in its current form, with all the courage and diligence, will be able to do against the Israeli Air Force and Air Defense?

        As for the alliance, my doubts, however.
        It’s just that Israel has always helped its enemies fight each other.
        Otherwise, he cannot survive.
        While the Arabs beat each other, Israel breathes evenly.
  29. 0
    3 December 2015 20: 29
    Russia should take its Eurasian, "middle" place between the West and the East if it is possible to achieve a stable peace in the BV.
  30. 0
    3 December 2015 21: 55
    Iran is the allies of Russia. Fact!
  31. +1
    4 December 2015 02: 04
    Iran needs experience for their Air Force ...