Military Review

Russia supplied the party of Nurs to Iraq

23
Russia supplied the Iraqi army with a batch of unguided high-armor-piercing missiles that will be used for strikes against IS from Iraqi military helicopters Mi-28HE, Mi-35М and Mi-171, reports MIC with reference to the military department of the country.




"A batch of 80-mm NURS of a new type has been received from Russia, which will be effective in the fight against armored targets," the department said.

Help newspaper: “Mi-35M and Mi-28NE helicopters are delivered to Iraq as part of contracts concluded in 2012-2013 for the sale of 28 Mi-35M and 15 Mi-28NE. Mi-171 helicopters were delivered to Iraq under a contract concluded in 2009 between Ulan-Ude aviation factory and one of the UAE companies. This contract stipulated that the Iraqi army would be the final recipient of 20 helicopters. According to reports, the United States paid for this deal. "
Photos used:
commons.wikimedia.org
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Irokez
    Irokez 27 November 2015 11: 12 New
    +6
    This is not enough. It is necessary to transfer more helicopters and planes from warehouses and storage so that this DAESH is bombed more.
    1. Tor5
      Tor5 27 November 2015 11: 15 New
      +2
      And not only shells - it is necessary to deliver delivery vehicles in larger quantities.
      1. vyinemeynen
        vyinemeynen 27 November 2015 11: 18 New
        +7
        This Abrams Igilovsky probably fuck.
        1. Al_oriso
          Al_oriso 27 November 2015 12: 30 New
          +1
          Iraq is very useful to us in case of what.
          1. Temples
            Temples 27 November 2015 13: 13 New
            0
            In which case? smile

            Better without a case.
            Agreed - fulfilled.
            And so on.
            Without any cases.
    2. Name
      Name 27 November 2015 11: 32 New
      +2
      Quote: Irokez
      This is not enough. N

      Well, little, little, but a start has been made, the main thing is that we began to relate to everything that is happening with us as a serious event. And to the children of Moses, - what your Menachem Schneerson says is wrong. Beware of indulging this madman. The pitchfork has not been canceled ...
    3. vodolaz
      vodolaz 27 November 2015 13: 41 New
      0
      Iraq asks Washington less and less, which pleases.
  2. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 27 November 2015 11: 12 New
    +5
    Shells of increased armor piercing. Do dushmans have many tanks wound up? They seized all the Iraqi army depots?
    1. venaya
      venaya 27 November 2015 11: 24 New
      +6
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Shells of increased armor piercing. Do dushmans have many tanks wound up? They seized all the Iraqi army depots?

      The Turkish army still has tanks. I think for them and need shells of increased armor-piercing.
      1. castle
        castle 27 November 2015 12: 20 New
        -10
        In! NURS with any armor-piercing, when used from helicopters, are effective only when used against a large number of armored vehicles, compactly concentrated in a small area. This is the first.
        The second - Iraq has already fought with Iran, and after the war of 1980 - 1988, the differences between these states did not decrease. Now Russia is arming both Iraq and Iran. Incidentally, during the Iran-Iraq war, the USSR supplied both weapons and advisory instructors to both Iran and Iraq. And now a new “friend” buyer in Russia has appeared - Saudi Arabia. And Saudi Arabia is the mortal enemy of Iran. And besides, Iran does not consider ISIS to be its enemy. And the Russian Chechens are Sunnis. And they have a love for Turkey and Saudi Arabia, but not for Iran.
        Now, get out!
        And further! Not every faction that opposes Assad’s "family" is ISIS. Yes! There is a difficult situation.
        1. Anatole
          Anatole 28 November 2015 05: 58 New
          0
          Everything is mixed up, horses are people.
          Quote: hrad
          And besides, Iran does not consider ISIS to be its enemy.
          Iran is Shiites, maybe the Persian ethnic group has no complaints and “igilos,” but ISIS Shiite apostates do not even consider people as religious jihad. The IRGC is not even taken prisoner.
          Quote: hrad
          And further! Not every faction that opposes Assad’s "family" is ISIS.
          On the rights of CEP? lol This is east! No, well, there simply doesn’t exist a line where you can draw out which group and under what conditions it changes color, swear it one by one, the chameleon in the best traditions of “walk the field”. The SSA fight with, as they say, ISIS bargains, and conduct joint operations with them. Thousands of gangs and units interact and are mutually absorbed depending on the theater of war. Today they are ISIS, tomorrow under the Taliban or under the guise of a "moderate opposition" they get moderate weapons and again moderately flow into any convenient one. As long as there are those interested in the destruction of Syria, weapons will flow like a river, including religious ones. Those who are fooled will not kill for the sake of the state and creation, this is religious fanaticism. Legally, they are criminals destroying the state, and there, as you like, call any abbreviations. All mechanisms and rights to eradicate them in the hands of justice in the person of the State.
          Quote: hrad
          And the Russian Chechens are Sunnis. And they have a love for Turkey and Saudi Arabia, but not for Iran.
          We have almost all Sunita Muslims in all regions of Russia. This is one of our main state-forming religions. Allah is one, and his residence is not in (Turkey or Saudi Arabia) and the Muslims of Russia are also themselves sufficient under the sky, without signs from the Turks and Saudis. And since 2000, love and tomatoes have ended, the second Chechen company has clearly shown this. Shoulder to shoulder, the Chechens and the Armed Forces were knocking out the Turks and Saudi radicals from their land. They faded back to Turkey and now they are sitting there, "the Caucasus emirates" are trolling.
          The Ba'ath party which the United States led by Saddam collapsed is the same as the Ba'ath party in Syria led by Assad. This is one of the problems in the settlement with the Kurds at Assad. If Saddam hadn’t sniffed with the USA in the 80s and 90s and hadn’t wagged his back then Iran wouldn’t have a “holivar”. Very indicative examples are Gaddafi, Yanukovych.
    2. bordos
      bordos 27 November 2015 14: 55 New
      0
      igil actively uses the practice of hanging armored plates on various vehicles, turning them both into armored vehicles and into delivery vehicles for explosive devices with suicide bombers to positions and roadblocks.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  3. Polite Moose
    Polite Moose 27 November 2015 11: 18 New
    +8
    The Turks brought tanks to the border with Syria. Iran received armor-piercing NURSs.
    Just like: "... The ambassador has a medallion, Shpak has a tape player. I am tormented by vague suspicions ..."
    And I have hopes. wink
    1. Nick Nick
      Nick Nick 27 November 2015 11: 31 New
      +3
      Iraq got .... and hosted there you know who ...
      1. Polite Moose
        Polite Moose 27 November 2015 12: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: Nick Nick
        Iraq got .... and hosted there you know who ...


        Like Krylov: "The monkey has become weak with old eyes ..." did not consider.
        Of course, NURSY in Iraq will also work, but it would be better in Iran.
        Just rejoiced ... sad
  4. alex-pmr
    alex-pmr 27 November 2015 11: 31 New
    +3
    [quote = Polite Elk] Turks brought tanks to the border with Syria. Iran received armor-piercing NURSs.

    Not Iran, but Iraq
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 27 November 2015 11: 34 New
    +2
    If each shell finds its target, that’s good.
  6. samoletil18
    samoletil18 27 November 2015 11: 38 New
    0
    Interestingly, and the participation of the Russian videoconferencing will not be requested?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 27 November 2015 12: 23 New
      0
      It has long been requested. A month ago.
      1. ded-mazai
        ded-mazai 27 November 2015 12: 57 New
        0
        But the Americans reassured them
  7. Coconut Tima
    Coconut Tima 27 November 2015 11: 49 New
    +3
    I would like to hear other news! Russia supplied the Syrian Kurds ATGM, MANPADS and so on and so forth
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 27 November 2015 11: 57 New
      +2
      All this will not go officially - through Iran.
    2. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 27 November 2015 14: 08 New
      +1
      Quote: coconut tim
      I would like to hear other news! Russia supplied the Syrian Kurds ATGM, MANPADS and so on and so forth



      Oh yeah! So we are waiting, so we are waiting for this news! And the followers of the Kurdish Workers' Party shot down another Turkish military helicopter (plane), .... the Turkish soldiers ... on the move ...
  8. Belousov
    Belousov 27 November 2015 12: 04 New
    0
    Another thing is curious. Explain to me the amateur: States paid for Russian weapons?!? Looks like something completely bullshit. Or is it impossible to use American shells constructively in our systems?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 27 November 2015 12: 28 New
      +1
      Well, it’s wise to buy equipment with standard weapons, and not to fasten Hydra to Mi-171.

      Theirs comes with standard weapons.

      There is now actively spending, the other day for the first time they showed Mi-28NE with 4 NURS units operating in Baiji, where the IS again launched a massive attack, repelled the dominant mountain Makhin and TPP.
    2. Alexvl
      Alexvl 27 November 2015 12: 39 New
      0
      They are more expensive and more complicated.
    3. Anatole
      Anatole 28 November 2015 06: 06 New
      0
      It was the Iraqis who ordered our weapons with experience in use since the days of the USSR. The main emphasis on the ease of development and use. Because pilots and service personnel are local, then they were the "beneficiaries" in preference.