Russia supplied the party of Nurs to Iraq

Russia supplied the Iraqi army with a batch of unguided high-armor-piercing missiles that will be used for strikes against IS from Iraqi military helicopters Mi-28HE, Mi-35М and Mi-171, reports MIC with reference to the military department of the country.

"A batch of 80-mm NURS of a new type has been received from Russia, which will be effective in the fight against armored targets," the department said.

Help newspaper: “Mi-35M and Mi-28NE helicopters are delivered to Iraq as part of contracts concluded in 2012-2013 for the sale of 28 Mi-35M and 15 Mi-28NE. Mi-171 helicopters were delivered to Iraq under a contract concluded in 2009 between Ulan-Ude aviation factory and one of the UAE companies. This contract stipulated that the Iraqi army would be the final recipient of 20 helicopters. According to reports, the United States paid for this deal. "

Comments

[Irokez]

This is not enough. It is necessary to transfer more helicopters and planes from warehouses and storage so that this DAESH is bombed more.

[Tor5]

And not only shells - it is necessary to deliver delivery vehicles in larger quantities.

[vyinemeynen]

This Abrams Igilovsky probably fuck.

[Al_oriso]

Iraq is very useful to us in case of what.

[Temples]

In which case?

Better without a case.
Agreed - fulfilled.
And so on.
Without any cases.

[Name]

Quote: Irokez

This is not enough. N

Well, little, little, but a start has been made, the main thing is that we began to relate to everything that is happening with us as a serious event. And to the children of Moses, - what your Menachem Schneerson says is wrong. Beware of indulging this madman. The pitchfork has not been canceled ...

[vodolaz]

Iraq asks Washington less and less, which pleases.

[oleg-gr]

Shells of increased armor piercing. Do dushmans have many tanks wound up? They seized all the Iraqi army depots?

[venaya]

Quote: oleg-gr

Shells of increased armor piercing. Do dushmans have many tanks wound up? They seized all the Iraqi army depots?

The Turkish army still has tanks. I think for them and need shells of increased armor-piercing.

[castle]

In! NURS with any armor-piercing, when used from helicopters, are effective only when used against a large number of armored vehicles, compactly concentrated in a small area. This is the first.
Second, Iraq has already fought with Iran, and after the 1980-1988 war, the differences between these states did not diminish. Now Russia is arming both Iraq and Iran. By the way, during the Iran-Iraq war, the USSR supplied both weapons and advisers-instructors to Iran and Iraq. And now Russia has a new "friend" - buyer - Saudi Arabia. And Saudi Arabia is Iran's mortal enemy. And besides, Iran does not consider ISIS its enemy. And the Russian Chechens are Sunnis. And they have love for Turkey and Saudi Arabia, but not Iran.
Now, get out!
And further! Not every group that opposes the Assad "family" is ISIS. Yes! There is a difficult situation.

[Anatole]

Everything is mixed up, horses are people.

Quote: hrad

And besides, Iran does not consider ISIS to be its enemy.

Iran is Shiites, maybe there are no claims and "igils" to the Persian ethnic group, but ISIS does not even consider the Shiites apostates for people, there is simply a religious jihad. The IRGC is not even taken prisoner.

Quote: hrad

And further! Not every group that opposes the Assad "family" is ISIS.

On the rights of CEP? This is east! No, well, there simply does not exist a line where it is possible to delineate which grouping and under what conditions changes its color, swear allegiance to one or the other, a chameleon in the best traditions of "walk the field". The FSA are barking with, as they say, the "ISIS" burghers, conducting joint operations with them. Thousands of gangs and formations interact and are mutually absorbed depending on the theater of operations. Today they are "ISIS", tomorrow under the "Talibs" or under the guise of "moderate opposition" they receive moderate weapons and again moderately flow into any convenient one. As long as there are those interested in the destruction of Syria, weapons will flow like a river, including religious ones. The fooled will not kill for the sake of the state and creation, this is religious fanaticism. Legally, they are criminals destroying the state, and then call them whatever you want with any abbreviations. All mechanisms and rights for their eradication are in the hands of justice represented by the State.

Quote: hrad

And the Russian Chechens are Sunnis. And they have a love for Turkey and Saudi Arabia, but not for Iran.

We have almost all Muslims are Sunites, in all regions of Russia. This is one of our main state-forming religions. Allah is one, and his registration is not in (Turkey or Saudia) and the Muslims of Russia are also sufficient under the sky, without instructions from the Turks and Saudis. And since 2000, love and tomatoes ended, the second Chechen company clearly showed this. Shoulder to shoulder, the Chechens and the RFSRF drove the Turks and Saudi radicals out of their land. They fled back to the Tutsiya and now they are sitting there, trolling with the "Caucasus imarats".
The Baath party, which was destroyed by the US led by Saddam, is the same as the Baath party in Syria led by Assad. This is one of the problems in the settlement with the Kurds in Assad. If Saddam hadn’t sniffed at the United States and wagged his backside in the 80-90s, then Iran would not have gotten a "holivar". Examples of Gaddafi and Yanukovych are very indicative.

[bordos]

igil actively uses the practice of hanging armored plates on various vehicles, turning them both into armored vehicles and into delivery vehicles for explosive devices with suicide bombers to positions and roadblocks.

[Polite Moose]

The Turks brought tanks to the border with Syria. Iran received armor-piercing NURSs.
Just like: "... The ambassador has a medallion, Shpak has a tape recorder. I am tormented by vague suspicions ..."
And I have hopes.

[Nick Nick]

Iraq got .... and hosted there you know who ...

[Polite Moose]

Quote: Nick Nick

Iraq got .... and hosted there you know who ...

As in Krylov: "The monkey became weak with his eyes in old age ..." I did not consider.
Of course, NURSY in Iraq will also work, but it would be better in Iran.
Just rejoiced ...

[alex-pmr]

[quote = Polite Elk] Turks brought tanks to the border with Syria. Iran received armor-piercing NURSs.

Not Iran, but Iraq

[rotmistr60]

If each shell finds its target, that’s good.

[samoletil18]

Interestingly, and the participation of the Russian videoconferencing will not be requested?

[donavi49]

It has long been requested. A month ago.

[ded-mazai]

But the Americans reassured them

[Coconut Tima]

I would like to hear other news! Russia supplied the Syrian Kurds ATGM, MANPADS and so on and so forth

[Vadim237]

All this will not go officially - through Iran.

[Mikhail Krapivin]

Quote: coconut tim

I would like to hear other news! Russia supplied the Syrian Kurds ATGM, MANPADS and so on and so forth

Oh yeah! So we are waiting, so we are waiting for this news! And the followers of the Kurdish Workers' Party shot down another Turkish military helicopter (plane), .... the Turkish soldiers ... on the move ...

[Belousov]

Another thing is curious. Explain to me the amateur: States paid for Russian weapons?!? Looks like something completely bullshit. Or is it impossible to use American shells constructively in our systems?

[donavi49]

Well, it’s wise to buy equipment with standard weapons, and not to fasten Hydra to Mi-171.

Theirs comes with standard weapons.

There is now actively spending, the other day for the first time they showed Mi-28NE with 4 NURS units operating in Baiji, where the IS again launched a massive attack, repelled the dominant mountain Makhin and TPP.

[Alexvl]

They are more expensive and more complicated.

[Anatole]

It was the Iraqis who ordered our weapons with experience in use since the days of the USSR. The main emphasis is on ease of learning and use. Because the pilots and maintenance personnel are local, and they were the "beneficiaries" of the preferences.