In China, passed the next test shock hypersonic aircraft

70
China conducted the sixth test hypersonic weaponscapable of breaking through the US missile defense system and delivering a nuclear strike, reports Look with reference to The Washington Free Beacon.

In China, passed the next test shock hypersonic aircraft
Artistic image of a hypersonic aircraft

“The super-fast weapon known as the DF-ZF was launched using a ballistic missile from Shanxi Province in central China,” the publication said.

According to the publication, "the device separated from the launch vehicle at the upper limits of the atmosphere, and then planned down, hitting the target in western China - at a distance of several thousand kilometers from the launch site."

The flight of the device was recorded by the US military. According to them, "DF-ZF was flying at a speed exceeding 5 Mach."

According to the newspaper, the launch took place on November 23 - on this day Beijing closed the air service for about an hour.

According to unofficial sources, the maximum speed of the device can reach 10 Mach.

"The speed and maneuverability allows DF-ZF to overcome the American missile defense system, which is designed to counter non-maneuverable missiles," concludes The Washington Free Beacon.
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    27 November 2015 09: 41
    5 mach is how much?
    1. +3
      27 November 2015 09: 45
      Google to help you
    2. +4
      27 November 2015 09: 45
      "How much is 5 swings?" ......... Five sound speeds.
      1. +9
        27 November 2015 10: 19
        Anecdote about swings:

        - Abrasha, I gave a blunder!
        “Sarah, who is Mahu who lives a floor above?”
        - no, I lost my wallet!
        - Oh Sarah, you'd better give Mahu!
    3. +4
      27 November 2015 09: 46
      5 sound speeds
    4. +4
      27 November 2015 09: 46
      330 m / s x 3600 seconds = 1188 km.x 5 max = 5940 km. in hour.
      330 m / s the speed of sound propagation in the air, exceeding the barrier is the max.
      1. +3
        27 November 2015 09: 56
        different speeds of sound at different altitudes, it all depends on density, 330 is ideal near the ground, so the flight speed was about 6-7000 km / h in the upper layers
    5. +3
      27 November 2015 09: 51
      it's a little over five kilograms ... belay
    6. +5
      27 November 2015 10: 02
      Gandelman (1) IS Today, 09:41
      5 mach is how much?
      At sea level, the speed of sound is 340 m / s or 1225 km \ h
      at an altitude of more than 11 km 1 max = 295 m / s or 1062 km / h
      Multiply in place of you?
      And on the account of the Chinese shock hypersonic aircraft. So, I have one version about this. Our agreement with the United States has a ban on anti-ship ballistic missiles. So the Chinese appeared on arms. Which was demonstrated in their last parade in Beijing. I think that the Chinese could not do without our help there. But the tests of this device, they are already on the basis of warheads from anti-ship ballistic missiles sculpt themselves.
      1. +1
        27 November 2015 11: 09
        Yes, they say all our technologies, they just decided to secure China upstairs, they also have a rod for it. Intelligence reported that there was little time left for the Big Boom.
        1. 0
          27 November 2015 12: 34
          In the year 2010-2011, the article was in a military journal (I don’t remember which one) that our Chinese and I jointly developed the Chinese analogue of the S-400 ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        27 November 2015 12: 07
        Quote: Observer2014
        Multiply in place of you?

        They attacked a person. And he just does not know what the Mach number is.
    7. 0
      27 November 2015 10: 23
      almost 6000 km / h
    8. +1
      27 November 2015 10: 26
      Quote: Gandelman
      5 mach is how much?

      almost like a "bug" downhill on the fourth! wassat
    9. 0
      27 November 2015 13: 42
      331m / s x 5
    10. 0
      27 November 2015 19: 45
      Quote: Gandelman
      5 mach is how much?

      Young man, open the physics textbook on the corresponding page, at the same time read in advance what physics is. Recruits will be fucked, damn it !!
  2. +3
    27 November 2015 09: 42
    China is developing serious bullshit! what
  3. +3
    27 November 2015 09: 44
    So it’s also possible for us to be crazy. what
    1. +9
      27 November 2015 09: 49
      As life has shown, even the Turks can shit at us.
      1. +1
        27 November 2015 10: 13
        Even the Turks, I never doubted that they would be crazy! I just thought when and how, in addition to economic sanctions, we will answer!
        1. 0
          27 November 2015 12: 36
          They have enough economic sanctions above the roof! After half a year, Erdogan themselves will be demolished ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +7
    27 November 2015 09: 49
    While the world is on the brink of an abyss, the Chinese are licking themselves under the tail and go about their business! Nothing concerns them ... good position!
  5. 0
    27 November 2015 09: 52
    Is a ballistic missile warhead not a hypersonic device? Some fly with cosmic speeds.
    Ducks are everything, "Po Pekeski". A maneuvering warhead can be passed off as anything.
  6. -12
    27 November 2015 09: 53
    and they don’t need weapons. they will buy half a country from us for 30 silver coins.
    1. -5
      27 November 2015 10: 03
      What is the truth piercing gentlemen minusers?
      1. +8
        27 November 2015 10: 10
        Quote: Not a zombie
        and they don’t need weapons. they will buy half a country from us for 30 silver coins.

        Run from Russia before it is sold-Run!
      2. 0
        27 November 2015 15: 52
        they are hardworking people !!! and their hands grow where necessary))
    2. +4
      27 November 2015 10: 17
      Didn’t you take on a lot to speak for half the country?
      Speak for yourself!
      1. +5
        27 November 2015 10: 20
        Quote: sa-zz
        Speak for yourself!

        This is our liberal opposition, sold with giblets, yelling that everyone will be sold soon.
      2. +4
        27 November 2015 10: 28
        Our local authorities can sell anything and land along with the infrastructure of the population and you in addition - only you will find out later.
        1. +1
          27 November 2015 12: 11
          Quote: Vadim237
          Our local authorities can sell anything and land along with the infrastructure of the population and you in addition - only you will find out later.

          Here is a strange "Not a zombie" wrote essentially the same thing and got a bunch of minuses. The policy of double standards on the forum?
  7. +5
    27 November 2015 09: 54
    After the Turks, one shouldn’t really trust anyone ...
  8. +1
    27 November 2015 09: 58
    True, the device weighed 1000 kg, and before landing there were 5 :).
  9. 0
    27 November 2015 09: 59
    Quote: jarome
    The fifth generation fighter was also made, advertising went, etc., but in the end they bought a Su-35 ...
    What, like BE, gives rise to a little doubt in the statements of China. But this cannot be ignored.

    you can draw anything)
  10. +1
    27 November 2015 09: 59
    How interesting is China so successful in hypersound, if it itself cannot make a reliable engine for aircraft? And it also buys from us the S-400
    1. +1
      27 November 2015 10: 30
      How interesting is China so successful in hypersound, if it itself cannot make a reliable engine for aircraft? And it also buys from us the S-400

      Most likely due to Free fall acceleration this is the vector sum of two terms: gravitational acceleration caused by gravity, and centrifugal acceleration associated with the rotation of the Earth, which is about 10 m / s². Ballistic missile rises to a great height and went to the coordinates on the engines that will allow you to further increase speed plus provide maneuvering.
      1. 0
        27 November 2015 12: 13
        Quote: sa-zz
        centrifugal acceleration,

        There is no such thing in physics. Open the textbook for the fifth grade and read (Soviet is better)
        1. 0
          27 November 2015 12: 27
          In modern physics, there really is no definition of centrifugal acceleration and its trajectory. This is the problem for creating a completely new principle of operation of aircraft in particular engines. Already there is a layout and there is a justification for these processes, but you simply cannot have it !! ??? It remains only to break through the concrete brains of the old thinkers.
          1. 0
            28 November 2015 19: 02
            Quote: gridasov
            and you just can’t have this !!?

            Not with me, but in general. There is a concept of centripetal acceleration, which makes a body move in a circle: the force of gravity or the reaction of support. It is the force directed against the vector of this acceleration that is called "centrifugal" the body presses on the support or stretches the suspension. What are the problems with the engines? There is simply no such thing as centrifugal force, but there is a reaction of a support or suspension.
            1. 0
              28 November 2015 21: 39
              Read Schauberger and expand your knowledge of motion - their types, dimensions, vectors. Try to explain to yourself. what is "reaction" There is no definitive definition for every word and term. Therefore, only mathematics enables a person to master the language of numbers, understandable to everyone and everyone and not only on this planet.
              1. 0
                29 November 2015 05: 50
                Quote: gridasov
                Therefore, only mathematics allows a person to master the language of numbers understandable to everyone and everyone

                I am not a mathematician and have no higher education. Why should I read a book where I understand one word out of five? I said what I remember from the course of school physics and let someone throw a stone at me who says that it was different. You begin to get mad and flaunt your type of erudition. Yes to health. You can assume that the Earth is flat and the sun revolves around it.
                PS Do not look for difficulties where everything is simple.
                1. 0
                  29 November 2015 13: 14
                  In general, the criterion that I allow myself to say what I think is the topic of the article under discussion. If you know the methods and ways to overcome the destructive phenomena at ultrahigh speeds, then I will listen to your opinion. If you know simple methods for achieving these speeds and the essence of the technical solutions themselves, then please. I personally bow to your genius. Therefore, you own the topic and understand the key fundamentals of what to understand the phenomenon, means to master the method of mathematical analysis of complex and differently dynamic associated processes, it means to own methods for solving other algorithmic problems. And if you do not own the topic, then I do not blame you. But what right do you have to shut my mouth personally and give advice?
                  I will say directly for me personalities do not exist and I don't give a damn about that. We need ideas and solutions to the assigned tasks, and not the solution of problems problems "in the nose". All smart people see that a lot of money is being spent, thousands of people are working, but the matter does not budge. No one is able to overcome the elementary boundaries of destruction of a rotating met. disk. What to say about the problems on the propellers and in the turbines. Etc
  11. +6
    27 November 2015 10: 03
    News: Erdogan said that if the Russians take down a TURKISH plane over the territory of SYRIA, he will regard this as aggression. To go nuts! And what are the Turks doing over Syria?
  12. +2
    27 November 2015 10: 25
    Quote: Rezistant
    China has such an ancient history that all the others are for them a "temporary phenomenon", and some are just a "temporary inconvenience". So, of course, one can hope for the solidarity of China, but one should not expect it seriously.

    I agree, the Chinese are still "friends".
  13. Riv
    0
    27 November 2015 10: 44
    Well, if you think about it with your head, then any ICBM in the active phase of the flight gives the warhead a speed close to the first space speed, which is several times greater than "Mach 5 speed". That is, the warhead falls at hypersonic speed anyway.
    I did not understand what outstanding the Chinese have achieved?
    1. +1
      27 November 2015 11: 19
      It dives into the upper atmosphere, where missile defense, by definition, cannot reach that speed and maneuvers. The missile defense also moves in space no faster than a warhead, but Americans believe that they can calculate the point of meeting with the warhead and missile defense. So, this is the SDI in a new guise and cut. The missile defense system will not work for them, Europe and the USA will be destroyed.
      1. 0
        27 November 2015 14: 31
        On "Bulava", if I'm not mistaken, they are exactly like that. On the Yars, it seems, too. Hypersonic blocks accelerated by ICBMs and controllably falling due to the atmosphere.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. +4
    27 November 2015 11: 22
    This is a text for stupid ones. If a ballistic missile raised some shapeless mass to the upper layers of the atmosphere and let it go, then it will just fly to the surface of the Earth. So the Chinese are solving the problem of not achieving speed, but the problem of ensuring that the device does not melt. Where are all the engine solutions here? Where are the solutions to achieve high speeds?
    1. 0
      27 November 2015 11: 31
      The Chinese most likely did not bother with the scramjet, but put on this hypersonic warhead a conventional solid-fuel accelerating engine.
      1. -1
        27 November 2015 11: 40
        Obviously! Everything says that. that they do not own, so to speak, a "school" that is capable of solving such problems. Therefore, they waste money on projects that, in fact, by their decisions, have long been achieved by other countries.
  15. 0
    27 November 2015 11: 50
    5 Makhov and "planned" somehow does not sound)) fell stupidly ??
    1. 0
      27 November 2015 12: 14
      It is necessary to be more tactful in expressions. Still, the comrades worked and invested considerable money.
      With all this, there are problems with understanding physical processes, and all the more unattainable to manage them. And the proposed solutions conflict with classical theories.
  16. 0
    27 November 2015 12: 11
    Normal maneuvering warhead. Well, why give big names and scare ourselves.
  17. 0
    27 November 2015 12: 17
    It just occurred to me. Any ballistic missile gives the warhead almost the first cosmic speed, which is much more than 5 Machs. Perhaps the Chinese are trying to make a lighter rocket with a warhead speed of only 5 Machs, and then get the warhead to make pancakes like stone on water in the atmosphere, each time changing the angle of rebound, and thus reaching the goal in the United States.
    1. 0
      27 November 2015 12: 36
      In space, yes, in the atmosphere, warheads are braked up to 5 max and uncontrollable they can be intercepted. Here the warhead makes small twists in the program, it is much more difficult to intercept it, in fact, after each turn you need to recalculate the trajectory and launch a new missile defense.
  18. 0
    27 November 2015 12: 26
    Let the Americans fear, not us, so even the Chinese.
    1. 0
      27 November 2015 13: 21
      Quote: chunga-changa
      Let the Americans fear, not us, so even the Chinese.

      What about us? Stopped afraid, like you’re used to or haven’t started yet laughing
  19. 0
    27 November 2015 13: 36
    I do not see the expediency of using this "bullet" ...
  20. 0
    27 November 2015 14: 08
    I already wrote on another site. But it’s not
    strike aircraft
    it's a warhead. Fell in supersonic (Sorry, of course in hypersound) with a maneuver. But you can’t call it a flight. I do not detract from the merits of the Chinese, but journalists, as always ....
  21. 0
    27 November 2015 22: 55
    Quote: Tiger4
    they are hardworking people !!! and their hands grow where necessary))

    Nobody argues with this. But in order to create a truly hypersonic aircraft, not only hands are needed, developments are needed, a school is needed, technology is needed. It is one thing to equip a certain planning warhead with a rocket engine, quite another hypersonic ramjet. This is about the same as the Chinese anti-ship ballistic missile. There is no necessary radar, the characteristics of what is not consistent, however, in the desert they drew a silhouette and hit it twice. And it is not clear before drawing or after. And an aircraft carrier is not a contour, always standing motionless ... So here. It looks like another Chinese fake. And the publication itself already so many times betrayed that there was no faith

    Quote: Azitral
    On "Bulava", if I'm not mistaken, they are exactly like that. On the Yars, it seems, too. Hypersonic blocks accelerated by ICBMs and controllably falling due to the atmosphere.

    And on that, and on another NUBB (uncontrolled warheads). An attempt was made to make a controlled unit in the USSR. But he didn’t go into the series, because in comparison with the usual block it was several times larger.
    If everything goes well (tests), then perhaps we will get a controlled hypersonic unit on the upgraded version of the 35th missile and, in the future, on the Sarmat ...