Syrian Ambassador in Moscow: “We consider any actions of foreign forces in Syria without coordination with official Damascus and outside the coalition with the Russian Federation as acts of aggression”

47
Syria’s ambassador to the Russian Federation, Riad Haddad, said that the Syrian people welcomed the assistance provided by Russia in the fight against terrorism. At the same time, the head of the Syrian diplomatic mission in the Russian Federation notes that official Damascus will consider any actions of foreign armed forces on its territory as acts of aggression if these actions are not coordinated with the Syrian authorities and are not conducted as part of a coalition with Russia.

Syrian Ambassador in Moscow: “We consider any actions of foreign forces in Syria without coordination with official Damascus and outside the coalition with the Russian Federation as acts of aggression”


Interfax quotes the statement of the Syrian ambassador:
Any force, any country that claims to counter terrorism in Syria, must coordinate with the Syrian government army and the Syrian government, and this also applies to France. Any actions without coordination with the Syrian government are considered aggression against the country. A very important point: any force or country that coordinates its actions with Russia automatically coordinates them with the Syrian government. From the very beginning of the crisis, Russia has led international efforts to eliminate terror, and therefore the Syrian government agrees that Russia is coordinated with any country in this area. This will be considered automatic coordination with the Syrian army.


Meanwhile, the Syrian government army and militia backed aviation The Russian Aerospace Forces continues to advance in various provinces of the country. For example, a large number of militants of the so-called “Islamic State” were killed in the province of Suweida, who tried to hide from air strikes and artillery in one of the villages - in the homes of local residents. Precise attacks took the terrorists by surprise at the moment when they tried to move from the settlement of Al-Qasr to the village of Al-Hakf.

According to the news agency SANA, in the town of Erich (Idlib Province) army units destroyed a group of militants from 15 people, in which was one of the leaders of the Idlib cell "Dzhebhat al-Nusra". Prior to the platoon, militants of the terrorist organization “Junud al-Aqsa” were liquidated in the province of Hama. Among those killed was the field commander of the gang.

The Syrian army continues its offensive in the provinces of Aleppo, Lattakia, Damascus and others.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +35
    20 November 2015 14: 21
    because there is nothing for the Westerners to do there ... brave NATO guys have already shown where they are present, there is a drug of rape and an increase in crime ...
    1. +24
      20 November 2015 14: 25
      For a long time it was necessary at the UN to raise the issue of aggression from the United States and the coalition. We would support.
      1. +17
        20 November 2015 14: 29
        Any power, any country ... and France, this also applies. Any action without coordination with the Syrian government is considered aggression against the country.
        I have the same question - why should this note be sent to the UN? After all, this really contradicts the UN Charter! Why do not they seek the truth on this issue? Putin has long said that these Westerners are outlawed there, and even there is no rustle!
        1. +27
          20 November 2015 14: 31
          The Syrians are bolder. This is good, it means ours seriously support Syrian statehood.
          1. +4
            20 November 2015 14: 35
            Quote: Wend
            The Syrians are bolder. This is good, it means ours seriously support Syrian statehood.

            Right off the tongue! A very necessary statement and tough! Otherwise, Western jackals, as usual, rush to the section of the killed prey ... Although Victory is still far away and the road is thorny and dangerous! God bless Syria and Russia!
            1. +4
              20 November 2015 14: 47
              Any action without coordination with the Syrian government is considered aggression against the country.

              Accordingly, the Syrians on their land can legally blame everyone, including the mattress.
              And especially the French were shown the place.
              And then the French are completely insolent, they do not see the coast.
              They argue as if Syria is part of the French territory.
              1. +5
                20 November 2015 14: 58
                Quote: Temples


                And then the French are completely insolent, they do not see the coast.
                They argue as if Syria is part of the French territory.



                French women, French women - sent their unfinished aircraft carrier to Syria - again, as after the Second World War, they want to be among the winners, although they initially fought on the dark side (this also applies to Syria).
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. +3
                  20 November 2015 19: 33
                  Even in May forty-fifth the Germans noticed those wishing to cling to someone else's glory
              2. +4
                20 November 2015 15: 03
                Quote: Temples
                Accordingly, the Syrians on their land can legally blame everyone, including the mattress.

                Yes, no Assad will bring down. With this solitaire, he will become history the next day. He is not a suicide.
                Quote: Temples
                the French were shown the place

                But whoever didn’t tell anyone there - it’s important to have the means and strength to implement the declarations.
        2. +4
          20 November 2015 14: 33
          Quote: Baikonur
          Any power, any country ... and France, this also applies. Any action without coordination with the Syrian government is considered aggression against the country.
          I have the same question - why should this note be sent to the UN? After all, this really contradicts the UN Charter!



          There, the United States will kill everything, and the United States has not paid attention to the UN for a long time. How to make
          Any action without coordination with the Syrian government is considered aggression against the country.

          How to reinforce this?
          1. +4
            20 November 2015 14: 43
            X-101 and C-400 wink
            ....., .............. ..
            1. +5
              20 November 2015 14: 46
              Quote: Lance
              X-101 wink
              ....., .............. ..



              I am for! fellow
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. -1
            20 November 2015 21: 59
            To plant a "Poplar" grove in Syria, otherwise the world "democrats" cannot be stopped.
          3. 0
            20 November 2015 21: 59
            To plant a "Poplar" grove in Syria, otherwise the world "democrats" cannot be stopped.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        20 November 2015 15: 31
        What do you think the UN has a master? I assume the answer is obvious ...)))) request
      3. +7
        20 November 2015 15: 39
        Quote: Kil 31
        For a long time it was necessary at the UN to raise the issue of aggression from the United States and the coalition. We would support.

        We would support, here China would keep silent as always, and Washington’s pins would raise a howl
        1. +1
          20 November 2015 16: 27
          Quote: 79807420129
          For a long time it was necessary at the UN to raise the issue of aggression from the United States and the coalition. We would support.

          The United States has a veto; prior to your discussions, strictly speaking, they don't give a shit.
      4. 0
        20 November 2015 17: 47
        which UN? It has sunk into oblivion. And ub.lyud.kov there sitting for a long time it's time to put on a stake am
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +2
      20 November 2015 14: 42
      and hit the brazen black face
  2. Tor5
    +4
    20 November 2015 14: 24
    This is a very correct statement! He came without demand or invitation - that means - the enemy!
  3. +7
    20 November 2015 14: 24
    if these actions are not coordinated with the Syrian authorities and will not be carried out within the framework of a coalition with Russia.

    Clear position. The rest are illegal. It's time to play by the rules.
  4. +1
    20 November 2015 14: 25
    Respect and recognition can only be earned by actions.
  5. +2
    20 November 2015 14: 25
    Riad Haddad correctly listened to S. Lavrov's message
  6. +3
    20 November 2015 14: 26
    Strongly said. Apparently our pilots really pour in and where they should.
  7. +4
    20 November 2015 14: 26
    And now how will the coalition of democratizers (wrestlers with igil with two years of experience) be classified?
    1. +5
      20 November 2015 14: 29
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Well and what is it? And now how will the coalition of democratizers (wrestlers with igil with two years of experience) be classified?


      As always. Partners damn it. And their hands will be shook and stretched. )))
  8. +1
    20 November 2015 14: 30
    And rightly so! It’s high time to announce this to the whole world, including from the UN rostrum.
  9. 0
    20 November 2015 14: 31
    That's right. If only they kept and listened.
  10. +6
    20 November 2015 14: 32
    It is a pity that this is stated by the Syrian ambassador in Moscow, and not the UN secretary general.
  11. +8
    20 November 2015 14: 32
    The main thing is to officially warn in advance that all unauthorized aircraft crossing the Syrian airspace will be destroyed ... International law in this case is on the side of Syria. Yes, and the presence of modern air defense systems (I believe that the S-300 has already been delivered) sober up many
    1. +6
      20 November 2015 14: 34
      Quote: alex-pmr
      The main thing is to officially warn in advance that all unauthorized aircraft crossing the Syrian airspace will be destroyed ... International law in this case is on the side of Syria. Yes, and the presence of modern air defense systems (I believe that the S-300 has already been delivered) sober up many

      And who will bring down Americans, Israelis, Turks and others?

      These statements have sounded and what ?.
      1. +3
        20 November 2015 14: 41
        And who will bring down Americans, Israelis, Turks and others?

        The "moderate opposition" will be given the mandate ... the boomerang will return to the one who launched it! lol
      2. +2
        20 November 2015 14: 52
        Quote: Frigate
        And who will bring down Americans, Israelis, Turks and others?

        These statements have sounded and what ?.

        I'm interested too. No, well, the note is expected and fits into diplomatic logic. And then what? Words, notes, protests? The French ambassador to the Russian Federation openly made it clear today that they are not going to reckon with Assad.
        1. +4
          20 November 2015 15: 54
          Quote: U-96
          The French ambassador to the Russian Federation openly made it clear today that they are not going to reckon with Assad.


          Therefore, the Syrian ambassador retreated half a step behind our back. The French with Russia will have to coordinate and coordinate their actions anyway. The war is serious and considerable forces are involved in it. You will not be able to act independently. And here for all "partners" such an "ambush" has been agreed with the Russian Federation - that means they have agreed with Assad, regardless of whether you recognize him or not.
          As the saying goes: "I like it - I don't like it. Eat it, my beauty."
          1. +1
            20 November 2015 16: 19
            Quote: Polite Elk
            Therefore, the Syrian ambassador half a step behind us and retreated.

            beautifully said)
            Quote: Polite Elk
            The French and Russia will have to coordinate and coordinate their actions in any way.

            well, this is clear without a Syrian statement. He just gave carte blanche to the French, while preserving his face)
  12. +1
    20 November 2015 14: 32
    A coalition of aggressors, damn it. Syria does not need your "values".
  13. +1
    20 November 2015 14: 36
    Quote: keel 31
    For a long time it was necessary at the UN to raise the issue of aggression from the United States and the coalition.

    Well, what are you? After all, who orders the music, the girl and dances. Who "feeds" the UN, he creates disorder in the world.
  14. +1
    20 November 2015 14: 37
    Well done ambassador, to interpret intervention in the territory of Syria in a different way, without the knowledge of the authorities, but you can’t call occupation!
  15. +2
    20 November 2015 14: 39
    So the Americans obeyed, as if they were worried about someone's sovereignty.
    1. -3
      20 November 2015 15: 07
      Quote: dvg79
      So the Americans obeyed, as if they were worried about someone's sovereignty.

      Maybe you don’t obey, but they strain and you have to change diapers, that's for sure.
  16. +2
    20 November 2015 14: 40
    The good news is a hint to everyone who did NOT take part on the side of the Syrian pro-government forces that they were explicitly NOT expected and did NOT want to see, and the approval process could be paused indefinitely. Russia WITHOUT external intervention MUST have time to completely reverse the course of the war in favor of Damascus. So turn it around so that ANY western resources and means would NOT have followers and fighters. That one would be simply terrible for the animal, and the second simply would not be, it will hide the desert ... half a year and nothing but sand from above.
    Sorry, Riad Haddad can’t put a couple of likes ... good
  17. +4
    20 November 2015 14: 42
    I also think what kind of nonsense it is when, like democracies bomb another with the sauce of fighting terrorism? So recently there were terrorists in France, let's declare it a nursery and we will weave calibers!
  18. His
    0
    20 November 2015 14: 45
    Allies to the end.
    1. +2
      20 November 2015 17: 32
      Syria / Russia, Moscow / Damascus: do I think these names are consonant with one?
  19. +2
    20 November 2015 14: 45
    therefore, the Syrian government agrees that Russia should coordinate with any country in this area. This will be considered automatic coordination with the Syrian army.

    It would not be bad, or rather, correctly from the point of view of international law, to make such statements officially, on behalf of the country, at the UN rostrum, preferably with the adoption of relevant resolutions.
    And so - this is so far only a statement by the ambassador ...
    1. 0
      20 November 2015 14: 51
      And so - this is so far only a statement by the ambassador ...

      Test ball!
  20. +1
    20 November 2015 14: 52
    Each statement of this level of persons should be supported by resources and actions. Let's see ... in theory, they should get some of the Eurosec or penguins out today.
  21. +3
    20 November 2015 14: 54
    I read the title of the article and I almost lost my eye. Nevermind I think the Syrians raised their self-esteem. Agreements from France and the rest are required. Yeah, I think so. The Americans fled and the coats of coordination agree. And then in the ambassador’s words I read how is correcto you need to coordinate your actions: "... any force or country that coordinates its actions with Russia, automatically coordinates them with the government of Syria ..."
    Such a statement should have been made for a long time. And then they lit, you know, there is a passage yard. And we (the Russian side) will somehow figure out who will be allowed into Syria with the "AGREED" stamp on their foreheads, and who will not.
  22. +1
    20 November 2015 14: 56
    Very reasonable and correct words. Whoever disagrees with them, let him sit at home and feed the refugees.
  23. 0
    20 November 2015 15: 09
    That's how many such very good statements in the history of Russia. Today they are friends, while Russia helps them, and the day after tomorrow, when the foreign policy situation has changed, it is possible to get a spit from a former friend forever. The Austrians under Nicholas 1, the Bulgarians under Nicholas 2, the Chinese under Stalin ... Who is next? Understand correctly, comrade officers, I do not cry out for the nations, but the top leadership. It’s just another, well, very good person once again said very correct words, but how many of those words have already been spoken ... And things are still there.
  24. Stepan stepanovich
    0
    20 November 2015 15: 12
    Any actions without coordination with the Syrian government are considered aggression against the country. A very important point: any force or country that coordinates its actions with Russia automatically coordinates them with the Syrian government.

    Right, but not convincing.

    Better this way:
    Russia has leased Syria 10 complexes S-300PMU-1. Any actions without coordination with the Syrian government are considered aggression against the country. A very important point: any force or country that coordinates its actions with Russia will automatically coordinate them with the Syrian government.
  25. +1
    20 November 2015 15: 18
    A very important point: any force or country that coordinates its actions with Russia automatically coordinates them with the Syrian government.

    This means that Russia will command the parade!
  26. 0
    20 November 2015 15: 22
    Strongly and timely said the Syrian ambassador! Just a question: WILL HEAR those whom the ambassador addresses? That's the question.
  27. +3
    20 November 2015 15: 29
    In an amazing world we live, however. In a world where you need to explain on your fingers that "war"there is aggression without the consent of the official authorities.

    This is obvious, what is there to explain. But no, some, exceptional, they perverted international law so that previously understandable postulates were leveled to everyone.

    Although, when viewed more broadly, activity hegemons and in other areas it is characterized by the same thing - the destruction of the original meaning of any institutions.

    What is sovereignty? Yeah this is when the government licks the anus to the hegemony - it is immediately sovereign.
    What is democracy? Ah, well, this is when the government, again, is loyal to the hegemon. There are no claims to Saudi Arabia regarding democracy (although the Sharia acts there), but then around some claims against any country whose point of view is at least slightly different from the State Department.
    What is family? Voluntary union of man and woman? Haha, no matter how! This is a blasphemous unnatural symbiosis of homosexuals.
    Who is she "Mama"? It "parent number 1". am
    What "triumph of democracy"? This is a humanitarian bombing!" am
  28. 0
    20 November 2015 16: 06
    Everything is correctly said by the Ambassador.
    Previously, they could not afford to say words in their defense.
    The West has been rushing Syria for many years, and if Russia didn’t solve the issue in time for chemical weapons, then there would be no one to help.
    And now quietly you need to restore your sovereignty (territorial, political, economic).
    And grateful Syrians will remember Russia for a very long time.
    And God forbid (in all its manifestations) that Syria would become a center for the development of the world in the Middle East.
  29. 0
    20 November 2015 16: 20
    We consider any actions of foreign forces in Syria without coordination with official Damascus and outside the coalition with the Russian Federation as acts of aggression

    So what? Assad declares war on the same France?
    1. 0
      20 November 2015 16: 42
      Quote: traveler
      So what? Assad declares war on the same France?

      No, of course. This is not a case for Bellie.
    2. +1
      20 November 2015 22: 08
      France has already received its war on its own territory in response to its own idiocy and the complete denial of its own interests!
  30. -1
    20 November 2015 16: 25
    you might think someone is interested in his opinion ...
  31. 0
    20 November 2015 16: 58
    Timely statement. However, France played an important role in the war against Libya and Syria, thereby contributing to the strengthening of DAES (b?). The French, if they realized and corrected themselves, could find goals in Turkey. Of a lot there. And our cruiser will cover.
  32. +1
    20 November 2015 17: 01
    Quote: Temples
    Any action without coordination with the Syrian government is considered aggression against the country.

    Accordingly, the Syrians on their land can legally blame everyone, including the mattress.
    And especially the French were shown the place.
    And then the French are completely insolent, they do not see the coast.
    They argue as if Syria is part of the French territory.

    Phantom pains. Syria was French.
  33. +1
    20 November 2015 20: 40
    Just yesterday, a video about the French in Syria caught my eye.
  34. 0
    20 November 2015 23: 45
    Well and blasphemy from such statements? anyway, to hit the western plane that appeared over Syria, let's say, it’s unlikely in principle ..
  35. 0
    21 November 2015 09: 02
    the ambassador is right, no one has canceled international law ...
  36. 0
    21 November 2015 14: 34
    Words and deeds.
    Sometimes disagree with Wishlist wassat