Military Review

End of market

60
The economic war between the superpowers becomes global


For the United States, the economy has long been the arena of struggle to achieve the goal outlined in the national military strategy - the new world order under American leadership. Russia can respond to the threat asymmetrically.

That the United States and its allies use the price of oil as weapon, not a secret. “The Petroleum Economic War (EV) against the Soviet Union,” says Norman, “ensured such success that this strategy is now being used against large geopolitical enemies with the goal of breaking into their political system. Multinational banks are equivalent the fleetbecause they are capable of projecting a force with powerful destructive potential. "

Something more dangerous


Expert Saul Sanders testifies: “For more than 40 for years, the United States and its allies have fought a formidable enemy armed to the teeth - from nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles to the world's best propaganda and subversive network. But the United States and the West secretly began to affect the numerous vulnerabilities of the Soviet autocratic economy. Perhaps that is why only a few people in Russia foresaw the extreme vulnerability that led to a sudden explosion. ” Considering the situation of the growing Russian threat in the context of economic confrontation, Sanders notes: "This is not a return to the Cold War, but in a sense it can even be something more dangerous."

A few years ago, the American online edition of Politico published an article entitled "The Pentagon Prepares for Economic War." In it, in particular, it was told about the first war game, focused not on bullets and bombs, but on how hostile countries can cause targeted damage to the American economy. It was also said about the elaboration of global scenarios that would allow the US to change the balance of forces in its favor by destructively affecting the economic systems of the adversary countries. All this was carefully studied by representatives of the US military and intelligence community.

The current confrontation is conducted mostly in secret. This permanent state, where there is no difference between war and peace, covers all spheres of existence of states and peoples. This is the new way of life. Economics and politics become weapons, subject to the single goal of dismantling states through destruction, including economic sovereignty.

According to globocrats, individual economies should become slave units of the monster state. Planting an open, borderless market The United States National Military Strategy (NAF) marks as one of the key objectives of the military.

In the States there is the Institute of Economic Warfare (IEV), which is part of the American Center for Democracy. It was created by neo-cons, one of the leading ideologues of which former Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Pearl, nicknamed the Prince of Darkness, gave the following assessment: "The IEM always anticipates the next threat."

Since Russia has been declared the main threat and target for extermination in the US NAF by Russia, we will need to protect ourselves from such aggression. This does not mean that we should exclude traditional war (TV) from the sphere of attention. It's time to go beyond narrow approaches. We need both strategies: symmetrical defensive and asymmetrical offensive (preventive), based on surprise, unpredictability. And here an important place is occupied by the economic component.

The Bloomberg editorial says: “It's time to spread the war to other fronts.” K. Morris states: “As tensions increase between Russia and the United States, it becomes more and more obvious that the EW between the two superpowers has begun. This battle is now taking on a global scale. ”

The extent of manipulation

The country's defense capability directly depends on the economy. EV is aimed at delivering an irreplaceable blow to the defense potential of the state - the object of the attack, depriving it of the opportunity to repel the aggression.

End of marketIn the British Encyclopedia (the most complete and oldest universal encyclopedia) the following definition is given: EE is the use or threat of using economic means against a country in order to weaken its economy and thus reduce its political or military power. EV also includes the use of appropriate means capable of forcing the adversary to change his policy or behavior or to undermine his previously normal relations with other countries. Such common means include a trade embargo, boycotts, sanctions, manipulation of tariffs, freezing of assets, suspension of aid, a ban on investment and other capital movements, and expropriation. This should also include the denial of access to the necessary physical, financial and technological resources or other blocking of gaining profit from trade, or deriving benefit from financial and technological agreements with other countries.

All this is point punches. But there are also weapons of mass economic destruction (OMEU).

Sanders writes: “The weaknesses of Russia are much more obvious now. In contrast to the Soviet era, present-day Moscow sought and, to a certain extent, achieved integration with the world economy ... The Russian leadership ignored the recommendations of advisers who warned about the growing impact of EV being led by the West. ”

The absorption of national economies by the world system in the process of integration with the subsequent elimination of economic sovereignty is the OMEU of the states in the course of the modern global confrontation.

The manipulation of the global financial system with the aim of blocking the adversary’s access to cash and credits for the development of production in general and the military-industrial complex in particular should also be attributed to the OMEA. In short, this is called financial manipulation and financial terrorism.

Among the components of financial terrorism is the material support of various extremist organizations (for example, ISIS), as well as participation in drug trafficking and other forms of smuggling, which requires the involvement of banks specializing in the laundering of criminal money. This plows the armed forces and intelligence services of the West in order to raise money for secret subversive operations.

Dubbing migration


The OMEA is also called mass migration organized artificially and provoked in one way or another, which is intended to create a pretext for the beginning of an armed intervention and to provide support from world public opinion.

Thus, to form the basis for NATO aggression, militants from the Kosovo Liberation Army, on pain of death, expelled Kosovo Albanians from their homes and drove them to the border, where Western correspondents with cameras were already assembled. Journalists recorded a crisis that required “humanitarian intervention,” which began with the support of the duped world community.

What is happening today with mass migration from combat areas is the same provocative course aimed at inciting mass discontent of the population with the invasion of visitors. With the help of the same media, the situation can be brought to a boil, and then the public consciousness will readily accept war as the desired factor of “liberation”. After all, on television constantly show footage of how refugees are attacking the police, refuse from the proposed products and medical care.

Already appointed and the main culprit in this crisis - Russia. For example, Czech Defense Minister Martin Stropnitsky said that it is the Russian Federation that organizes, coordinates and finances the current invasion across the borders of the Balkan states into European countries of Muslims, men of military age. “The Russian Federation,” says Stropnitsky, “does not want the unity and cohesion of the European Union. I do not foresee that the current invasion of migrants will end soon. ”

The same fables, citing certain intelligence sources, are repeated by the new Minister of Defense of Hungary, Istvan Simichko. According to him, Russia is financing and organizing the transportation by bus of a large number of Muslims, men of draft age.

Presumably, it refers to the invention of Russian buses, which are able to swim in the Mediterranean. After all, it is from there, from the territories controlled by the Americans and their vassals, the main stream of migration comes.

Hungary and the Czech Republic were not in confrontation with us, in many matters they even identified themselves. And if all of a sudden the heads of the defense departments of these states act sharply anti-Russian, it means that the provoked migration crisis is meant to embroil our countries, to turn even those who are neutral, into enemies of the Russian Federation.

It is not surprising that, following the accusations of Russia in organizing an Islamic invasion of Europe, there are calls by some American analysts to immediately prepare for the inevitable hostilities against the Russian Federation.

Hierarchical and network approaches


EV covers not only the state level, but penetrates the society. In the strategic documents of the Pentagon, the main target of the modern war is declared the population of the country - the object of attack. Manipulating the behavior of people, influencing their consciousness, forcing dissatisfaction with the financial situation - all this can lead to devastating consequences. Economic losses and casualties as a result of the corresponding aggression can be many times greater than the physical losses in the course of traditional war.

A large-scale EV has been launched against Russia. It uses the entire arsenal of tools: from surgical strikes of high-precision economic weapons on individual targets to the global impact of the OMEU. But if EV is being waged against us, then it is necessary not only to defend ourselves, but also to win. Losing it leads to a deliberate surrender to TV.

Here a problem arises due to the fact that we have two opposing approaches to understanding such threats. This is due to the presence of two views on the economy as a whole. One is hierarchical, focused on monocentrism and the leading role of the state. The other is networked, aimed at fragmentation, economic separatism and management polycentrism with the main role of global structures and reducing state participation in the economy, because it interferes with an open market. As for such characteristics as fragmentation and economic separatism, their extreme manifestations were well defined by Canadian expert and director of international service High Alert Investment Management Ltd Ronald Holland, listing the following US goals for Russia: vassal dependence, territorial division and development of zones of influence.

The network economy is a departure from state responsibility for development. It is worth noting that the global crisis of the year 1929 was successfully overcome precisely when the market was limited or when it was completely abandoned.

At the center of the hierarchical model is an enterprise that provides industrial production and state sovereignty. In the center of the network - a bank associated with transnational financial structures, with all the ensuing consequences. So, Holland cites as an example the situation in Greece, clearly demonstrating that even in electoral democracy, whose citizens demand change, nothing like this can happen, because all politicians are subject to influential circles of foreign banks.

The proponents of these two approaches have different ideas about eh, threats and vulnerabilities that the adversary can use in its conduct. The fact that for some - a threat, for others - an advantage. What some view as a vulnerability, others consider it an achievement.

With the coexistence of such dualism, it is impossible to win in EV. Moreover, it will lead to defeat and to the surrender to TV. Need to be determined. Moreover, time is not just short, it is no longer critical.

Victory pledge


It may be objected that certain international treaties signed by Russia will not allow this choice to be made. In response, it is worth remembering the following words of Pyotr Stolypin: “The state can, the state is obliged, when it is in danger, to adopt the strictest, most exceptional laws in order to protect itself from disintegration. It was, it is, it will always and always. This principle is in human nature, it is in the nature of the state itself. When the house is on fire, gentlemen, you break into other people's apartments, break doors, break windows. When a person is sick, his body is treated, poisoning it with poison. When a killer attacks you, you kill him. This order is recognized by all states. There is no legislation that would not give the government the right to suspend the flow of the law when the state organism is shaken to its roots; which would not give him the authority to suspend all norms of law. This, gentlemen, is the state of necessary defense ... There are fateful moments in the life of a state, when state necessity is above law and when it is necessary to choose between integrity of theories and integrity of the Fatherland. ” In the conditions of war, all legal principles must be subordinated to the laws of defense of the Motherland and victory.

American analyst Christopher Martenson writes: “The United States has unleashed the EE against Russia. The situation is becoming more tense and has every chance of developing into something much bigger and more deadly than it appears in the Western press. If it looks like war, acts like war, smells like war, then it must be war. And everyone should be concerned about these events. ”

Of course, separate measures of economic impact for military purposes were applied in stories many times, but only now they took shape in the system, in the theory that became the basis of modern global confrontation.

To counteract this, Russia needs its own EW strategy. It must be offensive because defense does not ensure victory. And offensive direction is provided with a hard-willed course to preserve economic sovereignty while neutralizing vulnerabilities that can be used by the enemy and become threats.

According to Holland, President Putin and Russia will withstand this attack on the sovereignty of the country. EV will end in a dead end, because we can not be subdued by invasion. Let's hope that happens.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/28046
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avvg
    avvg 18 November 2015 15: 17 New
    +4
    The more they beat us, the stronger we become and we gather our strength and defend ourselves. In life, always like that!
    1. cniza
      cniza 18 November 2015 15: 32 New
      +1
      Quote: avvg
      The more they beat us, the stronger we become and we gather our strength and defend ourselves. In life, always like that!



      So many institutions are studying how to deal with us, but they have not understood the principle of the vitality of Russia. wink
      1. Temples
        Temples 18 November 2015 15: 37 New
        14
        The more they beat us, the stronger we become

        Well, I do not.
        I am not a masochist. Let someone else beat.
        We are strong by Faith.
        God has given us patience.
        But patience has a limit.
        A Russian rebellion is a terrible thing. It will not seem to anyone.
        1. U-96
          U-96 18 November 2015 15: 47 New
          +1
          Quote: Temples
          A Russian rebellion is a terrible thing. It will not seem to anyone.

          in fact, the classic, speaking of "meaningless and merciless", had a slightly different meaning)
      2. Sterlya
        Sterlya 18 November 2015 16: 47 New
        +1
        Is there some more. What does not kill us makes us stronger.
        1. Weyland
          Weyland 18 November 2015 20: 51 New
          0
          Quote: Sterlya
          What does not kill us makes us stronger.


          That which did not kill us will bitterly regret it - then now what our turn! am
          Charles 12th, Napoleon and Hitler are witnesses to this!
        2. The comment was deleted.
      3. marinier
        marinier 18 November 2015 17: 35 New
        +7
        In my opinion, the life-sustainability of Russia, in its Peoples.
        The population of this great country. In its unity, there is a lifespan. In the West, it’s long been understood,
        and tryuchiutsia to bring discord. An example of Ukraine brought to that
        example.
      4. 31R-US
        31R-US 18 November 2015 18: 05 New
        0
        That's right, therefore, the majority lives starving, so that they do not start to fatten, so that the pedigree does not deteriorate. recourse
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. iouris
      iouris 18 November 2015 16: 36 New
      +3
      It would be nice to understand that you are being beaten, or rather, strangled in the arms, and to understand how you got to such a life and what to do.
      West is one. The West considers everyone else as its own resource, uses all the others, first of all, to extract excess profits. The West has arrogated to itself the right and carries out total planning and management of everything through advanced technologies.
      The market is long over. This was written by Lenin in a fundamental study of capitalism, "Imperialism, as the highest stage of capitalism" on the eve of World War I, which is an example of research based on the analysis of statistical data.
    4. Riv
      Riv 18 November 2015 16: 54 New
      +5
      That which does not kill tempers? Well then, worms and hemorrhoids will make us the most.
    5. Million
      Million 18 November 2015 19: 43 New
      +3
      It's bad when some high-ranking officials hit us in the back
  2. Altona
    Altona 18 November 2015 15: 20 New
    20
    Medvedev with Ulyukaev, Siluanov and Nabiulina would be removed, it would have been easier ... These people do not contribute to improving things in the economy ...
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 18 November 2015 15: 25 New
      +8
      ... it is worth recalling the following words of Peter Stolypin:
      “The state can, the state is obliged, when it is in danger, to adopt the most stringent, most exclusive laws in order to protect itself ...


      I want to hear Putin say:
      “Being in a state of EV, the state, in order to protect itself from decay, adopted the most stringent, most exclusive laws against ... (a list of what prevents us from developing our economy, depending on the interests of the peoples of Russia) "
      1. Sura
        Sura 18 November 2015 15: 53 New
        +8
        And not only Stolypin, they forgot Stalin and his economy, which was opposed to the whole of Europe and, after all, they won ... so that there is experience and there is no need to be afraid. angry
        1. UralMan
          UralMan 18 November 2015 16: 27 New
          +2
          Quote: Sura
          And not only Stolypin, they forgot Stalin and his economy, which opposed the whole of Europe and, after all, won ... so that there is experience and we should not be afraid

          Yeah ... you would still remember Kutuzov ....
          first passed, and then drove the French
          Stalin- at first he shot, began to build, didn’t flabber near Moscow, pissed off the backyard, washed the filthy legs in the Volga ... well, and then how they gave it ... right up to Berlin ... well, there we were in the Reichstag too.
          I will not talk about Stolypin ....
          --------------------------
          What to rejoice ....
          First, in the face of my de mo, I really do not want ...
          Then we heroically launder ... I notice with my Russian blood
          ----------------------
          When we stop thinking, hindsight?
          ----------------
          And you say opposed
          Geyropa always wanted to enslave us
          And then we defend ourselves
          It's time to think already ...
          -------------
          Right did the GDP ... you have to beat the neighbor behind his fence
          1. Sura
            Sura 18 November 2015 18: 51 New
            +1
            Yeah, the fifth column stirred ... It hurt.
            And, most importantly, WE says, he is responsible for all of Russia at once.
            And we don’t forget anyone and Grozny, and Peter, and Suvorov, and Kutuzov and all our ancestors, and we beat you, we will beat and we will beat. And, as Stalin shot ALL, then EVERYONE lay down with one rifle for three in a three-ply and Suddenly turned out to be in Berlin, you forgot to add, you saw it yourself, well, or you personally knew the daughter of an officer who personally saw everything confidentially told you everything, then fled to the United States closer to democracy from repression.
            1. UralMan
              UralMan 18 November 2015 20: 20 New
              0
              Quote: Sura
              And we don’t forget anyone and Grozny, and Peter, and Suvorov, and Kutuzov and all our ancestors, and we beat you, we will beat and we will beat. And, as Stalin shot ALL, then ALL lay down with one rifle for three in a three-ply

              ------------
              And why are you so happy and who you pout and puff out your cheeks.
              Rejoice ... how they sailed to the sea by the blood of the people to Berlin?
              Who will you beat?
              Your reflection in the mirror?
              Scamps on a swamp, hanging a label ... WE ARE FOR PEOPLE
              Is this the fifth column?
              Yes, I personally like a drum, all this and all this gang of brothers.
              ------------
              All of you are the guardians of the homeland.
              Take away your pride.
              And do not put your bones in the three-ply.
              Enough already ... to be proud of stupidity.
              And remember and honor the HEROES and SONS of the fatherland to give.
              And nobody argues about this.
              Think broader and think ahead.
              1. Sura
                Sura 18 November 2015 20: 35 New
                -3
                Gee ... gee ... gee phrases, phrases, phrases. Rotten intelligentsia laughing
                1. UralMan
                  UralMan 20 November 2015 17: 35 New
                  0
                  Quote: Sura
                  Gee ... gee ... gee phrases, phrases, phrases. Rotten intelligentsia

                  You yourself whose servants will be?
                  Gee ... Gyshnik ...
                  Batrachek ... gypsy
    2. bubla5
      bubla5 18 November 2015 15: 37 New
      0
      So it’s necessary to coordinate with the State Department, and not with clowns
    3. Flinky
      Flinky 18 November 2015 15: 42 New
      0
      And who to replace? Here you, wise guy, will sit in Siluanov’s chair? Will you show us what? But I’m sure that the offended Siluanov will not begin to harm?
      1. gunya
        gunya 18 November 2015 16: 06 New
        +7
        Flinky (4) SU

        And who to replace? Here you, wise guy, will sit in Siluanov’s chair? Will you show us what? But I’m sure that the offended Siluanov will not begin to harm?


        Who to replace?
        Offhand: Glazyev, Boldyrev. Both have experience in senior government agencies. And if you look more carefully, then there are others.
        And “offended” in the appropriate place for fresh air and physical exercise. Especially "persistent" to hand over "Friendship-2".
      2. bubla5
        bubla5 18 November 2015 17: 15 New
        +3
        I would have sat down so old I dangle around the capital's brothels and live at the expense of the people
    4. Shark Lover
      Shark Lover 18 November 2015 15: 43 New
      +3
      The Zaitsevs, Perdyukaevs, Sirunaevs, Naebulins, etc. will appear. This is all the proteges, they will tear them down, they will put others. Puppeteers need to “torment” them a little. Who are they? Those who have loot, financiers, come from the 90s.
    5. Maxom75
      Maxom75 18 November 2015 15: 47 New
      22
      We have people in the economic bloc who are thinking: How would I fulfill all the obligations without affecting my pocket? So they come up with schemes as simple as the world: But should we take citizens from us? I always resent the fact that Rosneft, Gazprom are asking for money for a new flow from the budget. I do not understand, these companies belong to 51% of the state, and to 49 other private individuals and companies. So should be thrown off in the proportion of 51% of states 49% of other owners. Why should I pay their future income as a tax payer? Why every year they raise tariffs for everything, referring that they have an investment program, and what do I have to do with it? Do you want to invest? Invest from your considerable income) every year they pay 10-15 billion dollars in dividends). Pay less dividends, and develop a company for the savings, what do I have to do with it?
    6. U-96
      U-96 18 November 2015 15: 53 New
      +1
      Quote: Altona
      Medvedev with Ulyukaev, Siluanov and Nabiulina would be removed, it would have been easier ...

      why would it become easier? This is akin to revolutionary primitivism - down, and that’s it. Recalls the trilogy about Maxim, the dialogue between Maxim and Comrade Sverdlov - was the company treasurer? on the keys, you'll be the Minister of Finance ...
    7. Gardamir
      Gardamir 18 November 2015 16: 07 New
      +1
      Medvedev would be removed from Ulyukaev, Siluanov and Nabiulina
      And with whom will the president work, who appointed them and is completely satisfied with them?
  3. Vityok
    Vityok 18 November 2015 15: 22 New
    +5
    Quote: avvg
    The more they beat us, we become stronger.

    When they beat you must give back! angry
  4. slizhov
    slizhov 18 November 2015 15: 22 New
    +6
    In my opinion, everything related to aggression in the first place, the United States, around the world,
    all this is connected with the ECONOMIC PARTY, with the redivision of the world, to take, grab, select and ... RICH !!! IS NOT IT AN ECONOMY?
    All these clubs also work for an alliance of countries that, through coercion, can achieve better economic heights.
    That's just the song Nightingale sung ...
    The dollar no longer has those prospects, it is no longer a highlight, to which everyone tried to reach with his five.
    Yes, and the authority of both NATO and the United States, well ... so melted under the sunshine of our actions, both in Ukraine and Syria, that the ice block is rapidly rushing to the volumes MANDIDELY ... !!! :)
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. volot-voin
    volot-voin 18 November 2015 15: 24 New
    11
    End of the market

    Peace be upon him, aspen stake in the body smile The market is certainly not going anywhere, but a one-sided partnership with one goal must be completed. First of all, national interests, and then international rules.
  7. sa-zz
    sa-zz 18 November 2015 15: 30 New
    +2
    Good article. Thank.
  8. A-Sim
    A-Sim 18 November 2015 15: 32 New
    +5
    "... while you look at the left hand, the right hand and performs ALL FOCUS."
  9. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 18 November 2015 15: 35 New
    +4
    "The economic war between the superpowers is gaining global scale" ////

    What super powers?
    If it was written: "cold war between the superpowers" - it would be clear:
    the author implies the USA and Russia.

    What about the economic? USA and China, probably. The "heavyweights" of their GDP (Gross Product) are approximately equal.
    Russia is currently economically “lightweight”.

    Chinese general battle - 2nd Silk Road. Freeway High-Speed ​​Railway and highway from
    Pacific to the Atlantic Ocean. Built so far only to the Persian Gulf.
    American General Battle - The Pan-Asian Partnership Agreement (Trans-Pacific Partnership), recently signed. But not yet ratified.
    Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru,
    United States, Vietnam, New Zealand
    China is not included in it.
    And the Pan-Atlantic Trade Union (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership - TTIP)
    Signed (only as a memorandum) in 2015.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 18 November 2015 16: 00 New
      +4
      And your list is not an offensive plan? The number of countries in it is not an indicator. Fingers alone do not solve anything without a brain. Say they are not controlled? Is globalization not a takeover? Each country has a narrow specialization. All is led by one country. Are all countries developing freely? And some countries do not collapse as competitors? Around Israel, several countries (enterprises) have already been destroyed. The process goes very violently and with gangster methods.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 18 November 2015 16: 09 New
        -1
        "Globalization is not a takeover?" ////

        Globalization is a unique opportunity to sell
        any product manufactured in your country, to any
        country of the world. Quickly, without bureaucracy, bribes, customs duties.

        It would be that to sell wink .
        1. Andrey_K
          Andrey_K 18 November 2015 16: 48 New
          +6
          The flip side of the coin is financial expansion.
          With the help of finance, the one who has a lot of money more will easily take all the profits from the one who "profitably sold his goods."
          To do this, he does not need to produce anything - it is enough to have more money than anyone and ... globalization.
        2. 34 region
          34 region 18 November 2015 19: 07 New
          +4
          Globalization is a narrow specialization. Country breakdown by enterprise principle. Country-well, country-resort, country-bananas ... And the head is Washington.
        3. UralMan
          UralMan 18 November 2015 20: 35 New
          +1
          Quote: voyaka uh
          "Globalization is not a takeover?" ////

          Globalization is a unique opportunity to sell
          any product manufactured in your country, to any
          country of the world. Quickly, without bureaucracy, bribes, customs duties.

          It would be that to sell wink .

          --------
          you would notice everything to the Jews and teach everyone ...
          you always know better ...
          also we are not stitched together
          Let’s figure it out - push and shogo quick
        4. komel
          komel 18 November 2015 23: 59 New
          +1
          So it is possible to sell on the global market, however, certain countries have imposed sanctions against the Russian Federation. Against the German auto industry, the United States in its market found a method to adjust the terms of trade. Banks of several EU countries pay fines by the American for non-compliance with their laws. Globalization under the control of one separate country is not a blessing, but the surrender of competitive industries. In Europe, they are going to sign an agreement with the USA, but ordinary people are not told its meaning, where huge corporations will win, and people will be told about saving measures. Why is globalization better than national? When in each country they decide with whom and how to trade.
        5. kush62
          kush62 19 November 2015 04: 17 New
          +1
          voyaka uh Yesterday, 16:09 ↑
          "Globalization is not a takeover?" ////

          Globalization is a unique opportunity to sell
          any product manufactured in your country, to any
          country of the world. Quickly, without bureaucracy, bribes, customs duties.

          It would be that to sell


          Current globalization is an attempt to shove first of all the goods of the USA and its allies, and crush the rest. Which, in my opinion, is confirmed by the article.
      2. DobryAAH
        DobryAAH 18 November 2015 17: 30 New
        +1
        Around Israel, several countries (enterprises) have already been destroyed. The process goes very violently and with gangster methods.

        Israel is quietly sitting, that he should speak, there is a brawl between neighboring states, this is at hand. And the defragmentation of the states around, too. It is easier to deal with gangs than with Hezbola, catching fish in troubled waters. Again, IG sells cheap gasoline. Uncle Sam set up his vassals in BV on this matter.
        Israel seems to have nothing to do with it.
    2. 34 region
      34 region 18 November 2015 16: 03 New
      0
      Collectivization in NATO, WTO, the European Union just happened?
      1. U-96
        U-96 18 November 2015 16: 12 New
        0
        Quote: 34 region
        Collectivization in NATO, WTO, the European Union just happened?

        but what does it have to do with it? The meaning of the comment
        Quote: voyaka uh
        What about the economic? USA and China, probably. The "heavyweights" of their GDP (Gross Product) are approximately equal.
        Russia is currently economically “lightweight”.
        not who controls these 12 TTP signatories.
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 18 November 2015 16: 39 New
          0
          And why then, in your opinion, Vietnam or Peru
          signed up for an agreement? They were not forcibly driven.
          They have cheap labor, Americans are duty free
          they will not be able to prohibit them from selling with great profit
          their goods in the USA. A contract does not allow any
          trade "fences". Americans look strategically -
          don’t interfere in small things, then there will be a return profit -
          buy a Boeing airliner, for example.
          1. 34 region
            34 region 18 November 2015 19: 12 New
            +5
            Americans look strategically! There is no market. Such Danays with free cheese. In 90, we, too, seemed to voluntarily sell enterprises (to obtain modern technologies). Thanks, we got it. And no one forced us.
    3. DobryAAH
      DobryAAH 18 November 2015 17: 19 New
      +1
      The economic war between the superpowers is gaining global scale ////

      What super powers?
      If it was written: "cold war between the superpowers" - it would be clear:
      the author implies the USA and Russia.
      Well, probably even the economic potential should not be measured in dollars. If we measure it, then in units, kWh, the number of services, in physical units, in the level of education and science, as well as in the strength of the army and the military-industrial complex, they are a continuation of the economy.
      States stand with a military club and the dollar with a wild debt did not die.
      But according to these indicators, Russia is the supreme power, to have a little shade only in certain areas.
  10. Batia
    Batia 18 November 2015 15: 35 New
    0
    This article must be read and remembered by our liberals.
    1. U-96
      U-96 18 November 2015 16: 16 New
      +5
      Quote: Batia
      This article must be read and remembered by our liberals.

      always amuse such comments about the inclusion of an article in the list of obligatory reading by liberals. Kindergarten, by golly. And the essay read .... laughing
  11. Kolka82
    Kolka82 18 November 2015 15: 37 New
    +2
    Czech Minister of Defense Martin Stropnitsky said that it is the Russian Federation that organizes, coordinates and finances the current invasion across the borders of the Balkan states into European countries of Muslims, men of military age.

    Did he hear about the Dead Sea? Does anyone know who killed him? wassat
    1. DobryAAH
      DobryAAH 18 November 2015 17: 34 New
      +1
      Did he hear about the Dead Sea? Does anyone know who killed him? wassat
      Will they blame us again?
      1. U-96
        U-96 18 November 2015 19: 54 New
        0
        Quote: Good AAAH
        Will they blame us again?

        no, there are enough job seekers laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  12. Tanysh
    Tanysh 18 November 2015 15: 40 New
    0
    The diagnosis is clear. Who will write the prescription and when?
  13. nord62
    nord62 18 November 2015 15: 41 New
    +8
    Fair article! History fully confirms this. The assassination of Stolypin and World War I was unleashed because of fear of the growing economic power of the Russian Empire (economic data for 1913 in any history textbook). And then, the most economically developed countries of the West have chosen the policy of neocolonialism, in other words INEORABILITY (the proof is the principles of globalization, when the entire money supply and economic resource is concentrated in several states, but in fact in financial families). It is urgent to carry out not only import substitution, but also to move science NOT DEPENDENT from the West, but only using their discoveries. The economy should rely on OWN resources (a negative example is the supply of components from Dill). It is necessary to use your own intellectual, financial, economic potential (providing protection from defectors and traitors). Unfortunately, the CIS economy is moving very weakly in this direction, if not to say - it is treading water in place, thereby allowing the West to strike.
  14. trantor
    trantor 18 November 2015 15: 49 New
    -3
    I want Stolypin!
    1. woron333444
      woron333444 18 November 2015 16: 44 New
      +9
      Drive to the Far East, there they give a hectare
  15. aba
    aba 18 November 2015 16: 06 New
    13
    They may object to us that certain international treaties signed by Russia will not allow us to make this choice.


    No, that's not the point. For more than 20 years of new history, Russia has so successfully integrated into the global economy that people who made a fortune already prefer the prosperity of the world economy to the detriment of their state, especially since they have already prepared warm places for their asses outside of Russia. Where not to go - housing, abroad, children abroad, being treated abroad, etc. And what can connect them with Russia? Today, this is only one thing - the ability to quickly increase their capital, if this opportunity suddenly decreases or completely disappears, then these elites will completely leave Russia.
  16. roskot
    roskot 18 November 2015 16: 18 New
    +4
    It must be offensive, because defense does not provide victory.

    Exactly. You must be the first to throw pebbles into the garden. Let them bother. We will not be good for the West and the USA.
  17. Winter cherry
    Winter cherry 18 November 2015 16: 18 New
    -1
    Yes, okay, Russia has always raked out of difficulties. We are scared, but we are not afraid.
  18. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 18 November 2015 16: 20 New
    +3
    EV will end in a dead end

    this is the most important error. Such wars end with the death of one of the opponents.
  19. plotnikov561956
    plotnikov561956 18 November 2015 16: 20 New
    11
    The economic policy of Comrade Stalin was aimed at a specific goal and result. Therefore, they tested nuclear weapons at 49. Gagarin flew at 61. What we have now in Russia's economic policy ... is the Nanai theater with the struggle of boys. Listen to iPhone ... and His ministers. I don’t even want to swear. Idiocy of a universal scale. Gogol is resting with the "Examiner"
  20. capitosha1rang
    capitosha1rang 18 November 2015 16: 33 New
    +9
    Embargoes, sanctions, manipulation of energy prices, or food. Any other restrictions on anything. Something we do not know?
    Passed, passed, and again - passed!
    And we live!
    We are all Russians.
    And how do "saws" / "chewers" of different levels and rank live! Power engineer MosMetro caught on a bribe of 16 million rubles! With a monthly income of 1,5 million rubles. The bribe taker is smaller, smaller. I also got caught, which means I turned on the bait like a hungry perch, swallowed the “provocation” with bait, hook and even a fishing rod!
    It is not the embargo, sanctions and manipulation of energy prices that are dangerous for Russia - they haven’t seen it that way, but the unprecedented filling (even during the time of Mr. Saltykov-Shchedrin) of government structures with officials who are very keen on money. In the smallest city, the most "worn out" head of the housing department - and he is holding an unofficial tender - whoever pays the most will "roll back" to him personally for, say, cleaning the house territory, replacing the light bulbs and further, further ...
    We all live in this, our country, and we can’t expect another (I don’t need the Turkish coast!) And we all know and understand that the main enemy of modern Russia is inside it, these are many of those who have the right to sign - permitting or prohibiting . In life, they can be good comrades too; they love their families.
    In fact, this is the 90's generation. When money, and especially the dollar, became both the goal of life and the driving force of the new management community, based on old and, above all, family ties (the so-called administrative resource).
    Now, when the generation of scarab beetles changes, Russia will have no equal in the ability to determine whether to impose or abolish sanctions, embargoes, satisfying its energy prices, whom to chide kindly, and whom to really unfasten.
  21. anfil
    anfil 18 November 2015 17: 00 New
    +1
    According to Holland, President Putin and Russia will withstand this attack on the sovereignty of the country. EV will end in a dead end, because we can not be subdued by invasion. Let's hope that happens.

    Let them read the classics or ask A.S. Pushkin, he knows everything!
    ADDRESSERS OF RUSSIA

    What are you noisy about, folk-like?
    Why anathema threaten you Russia?
    What angered you? unrest in Lithuania?
    Leave: this is a dispute between the Slavs,
    Home, old dispute, weighted by fate,
    A question that you will not solve.

    For a long time among themselves
    These tribes are at war;
    More than once bowed under a thunderstorm
    Theirs, then our side.
    Who will stand in an unequal dispute:
    Puffy Lyakh, il true Ross?
    Will Slavic streams merge in the Russian sea?
    Will it run dry? here is the question.

    Leave us: you have not read
    These bloody tablets;
    It’s incomprehensible to you, alien to you
    This is a family feud;
    The Kremlin and Prague are silent for you;
    Pointlessly seduces you
    Fights of desperate courage -
    And you hate us ...

    For what? answer: for whether
    What is on the ruins of flaming Moscow
    We did not recognize the brazen will
    Who were you trembling under?
    For the fact that they plunged into the abyss
    We are idol over kingdoms
    And redeemed with our blood
    Europe, freedom, honor and peace? ..

    You are formidable in words - try in practice!
    Or the old hero, deceased on his bed,
    Unable to screw up your Izmail bayonet?
    Is the Russian tsar already powerless to speak?
    Or should we argue with Europe new?
    Il Russian weaned from victories?
    Or a little of us? Or from Perm to Tauris,
    From the Finnish cold rocks to the flaming Colchis,
    From the shocked Kremlin
    To the walls of immobile China,
    Shiny bristles,
    Will not the Russian land rise? ..
    So send us to us, Vitia,
    His angry sons:
    There is a place for them in the fields of Russia,
    Among the coffins that are not theirs.
    1. iouris
      iouris 18 November 2015 18: 38 New
      0
      With all due respect to those present and the author of the poems - how much can you? This poem is probably being used for the hundredth time.
  22. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 18 November 2015 17: 11 New
    +3
    What was, it will be; and what has been done will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun. "
    Ecclesiastes
    "The former assistant to the head of the Federal Property Management Agency, Alexander Nistratov, who is suspected together with ex-officials of the presidential administration of the Russian Federation in embezzlement of 3,5 billion rubles, has been put on the international wanted list. According to sources in the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Gazeta.Ru was checked at the same time. Moscow region to persons whose initials and surnames coincide with well-known VIP persons: lawyer Heinrich Padva, president of the Enlightenment publishing house Vladimir Uzun and businessman Boris Zingarevich and others. Http: //www.gazeta.ru/social/2015/11/18/ 7891331.shtml
  23. miroag
    miroag 18 November 2015 17: 12 New
    +3
    Quote: capitosha1rang
    Now, when the generation of scarab beetles changes, Russia will have no equal

    At the same time, the generation that remembers the strong power (USSR) and wants to see Russia strong will be replaced. It seems to me that today's passionarity comes from this reserve. If he is gone, will there remain a passion stock? And if it does not exist, then the transition of society to passivity and, as a consequence, the weakening of Russia will become quite real.
  24. goblin xnumx
    goblin xnumx 18 November 2015 17: 19 New
    +6
    it’s ridiculous to listen to your babble about the device and state policy — until there is personal responsibility and the principle of the inevitability of punishment — nothing will change — damn it — you’re almost military people on the site — you yourself remember — the soldier broke his shovel — didn’t follow the order for working with the ground — he what- a sergeant’s position with an omission or to give birth to a new shovel and “in the morning I come and go nuts”? - or did the company go home in the evening, state of emergency in the company and those who are higher and higher up to the regimental will answer for this? (I don’t know Guys, I slept, they misled me, Serdyukov)) - how would Nitak receive both the responsible and the company and all the higher-ranking persons who ask them, aren’t they? - hence the tradition to follow orders and monitor their implementation, but what do we see in power and government? - hence all the consequences
  25. yuriy55
    yuriy55 18 November 2015 17: 43 New
    +3
    About superpower and its shares per capita ...

    By GDP Russia ranks 15th ($ 1176,0 billion), exactly after Spain ($ 1230,2 billion)
    http://investorschool.ru/samye-bogatye-strany-mira-2015

    In terms of GDP per capita, Russia ranks 77th ($ 18100), exactly after Antigua and Barbuda ... and in Spain, which is at 47th place, this figure ($ 30100)
    http://nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/gdp-ppp

    Now tell me, fans of Ulyukaevschina and Silanovschina, as well as lovers of Nabiullinism, with what kind of good intentions and based on what fair distribution do these figures differ to such an extent?

    To me, a kind, intelligent and handsome man, in full bloom of strength, used to say:
    You can be considered a genius if you surround yourself with a crowd of idiots ... It's about how to choose between the "members" and "circles" of the government of one party.
    And once you have to make a choice: pull the strap further under a funny whistle and hoot, or search in the native expanses of someone smarter and disinterestedly, the guardian of the Russian state.
    yes
  26. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 18 November 2015 17: 51 New
    +4
    The article is wonderful, correct, necessary.
    It completely coincides with my understanding of what is happening, perhaps not only with mine.
    The question is how to make the country's economic bloc act on the side of the state, and not its enemies. Well, they don’t have any motivation to save the country. Maybe only Medvedev does not understand everything, he has elements of naivety, and the rest in the government consciously destroys the country in this economic war, they were taught by Western economists, they are obliged to follow the instructions of the IMF in order to receive encouragement and the title of best financiers.
    In the comments by type we all won, do not like. Yes, winning a fist fight is easier than an enemy acting from the underside, from behind, because of a dark angle.
    In the days of the Second World War they said that the victory was forged by the rear, i.e. Today it is necessary to protect the people of the country. What is the current government doing? I think it is necessary for the people to organize and defend themselves from economic shocks.
    I have a proposal - it is necessary to create and unite in consumer cooperatives, a certain analogue of what happened under the USSR. Membership fees will be the amount that will be spent on the purchase of the necessary equipment for organizing a small business. Everything needs to be carefully considered, but a mechanism for protecting the population from price lawlessness, unemployment, lack of money and poverty can be developed.
  27. leo3972
    leo3972 18 November 2015 18: 13 New
    +4
    It is necessary to rewrite the Constitution of the Russian Federation and remove all American democratizers from there !!
  28. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 18 November 2015 18: 20 New
    +2
    There is no need for enemies with our government, just chatter instead of business.
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. nail
    nail 18 November 2015 19: 24 New
    +4
    Good article. What kind of sovereignty are we talking about if our government complies with all the economic and financial recommendations of American advisers, which we also pay. The government has only difficulty translating from English into Russian. Not so long ago there were St. Petersburg and Moscow Economic Forums. The whole government together with liberals was in St. Petersburg, where they swore to continue market (capitalist) reforms. Progressively-minded scientists, industrialists gathered at Moscow, where they announced the ways to get out of this dead end, into which the liberals drove us. I will not retell the entire forum, but it’s also clear to the hedgehog that we will be full of guts with this government.
  31. Buffalo
    Buffalo 18 November 2015 19: 57 New
    +3
    "Hungary and the Czech Republic were not in a confrontation with us, in many matters they even solidified."

    The Hungarians (Magyars) suffered a crushing defeat from the Red Army near Voronezh during the Great Patriotic War. Their 20th army was almost completely destroyed, along with the personal regiment of Adolf Hitler (the regiment where he had previously served). This is the largest defeat of the Magyar army. The Czechs have a huge "tooth" on us, since the "Prague Spring". So, these are satellite nations, omission nations. Friends in misfortune. Near Voronezh, the Red Army was ordered not to take the Magyars captive, due to the particular cruelty on their part, in relation to our civilian population. Their corpses were not buried for a long time, and when they were buried, they were only lightly sprinkled with earth, so that on sandy soils, their bones were washed out to the surface after some time. As a student, in the second half of the 70s, I personally kicked them at the institute training ground, where we were taught tactical techniques. Also Italians, they were beaten a lot near Voronezh. - There were fierce battles, about 600 of our soldiers died, the city passed from hand to hand three times. The battles were comparable to the battles near Stalingrad. And only because they didn’t attract the title of Hero City to the city, where many defense enterprises were established after the war.
  32. Stelth1985
    Stelth1985 19 November 2015 05: 58 New
    +1
    The meaning of the article is simple, either a market or a planned economy. But it is not clear that the market is an absolute absence of clear laws and their implementation. It is an environment for the cultivation of traitors and enemies of the people. When a person considers grandmothers and considers how much he will make a profit, there can be no talk of any kind of joy for the Motherland. Such people have no homeland. The state is obliged to manage the main institutions in the country. If all these institutions of power are given to the looting of traitors, then after a while the country will not. And it is not always a question of physically eliminating it and eliminating the people as a species. It is enough to stupefy Bosch with cool phones, cool cars, fur coats, expensive trinkets of various kinds and people will forget themselves. PEOPLE will turn into POPULATION! That is a herd! These are no longer people, but animals that only want to satisfy their base needs and have completely forgotten the highest ideals and the very meaning of life and the universe! When a people falls to this, then it already does not have a right to exist. It must be wiped off the face of the Earth, since there is zero use from it. Infections are darkness. Environmental damage guaranteed. That is what the West is trying to bring us. We were always told about this in Soviet times. The problem is that the majority of the people are apolitical and believe that this does not concern them. TOUCHES! And how, for the war is aimed precisely at such weak people, because strong people cannot be broken morally, spiritually, physically. I hope I have not forgotten to describe briefly.

    For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!