Kerry: Assad buys oil from IG

121
US Secretary of State John Kerry called Bashar Assad a magnet for terrorists and accused him of buying oil from the "Islamic State", reports RIA News.



"The situation is such that it was he (Asad) who became for them (the terrorist groups in Syria) a magnet ... Asad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS"- said the state secretary at the meeting of foreign ministers in Vienna.

The meeting devoted to the Syrian problem, was held on Saturday. It was attended by representatives of almost 20-ti states (including Russia), the European Union, as well as international organizations.

Stepping out to the journalists at the end of the negotiations, Kerry said that the parties had agreed to take measures to ensure a cease-fire in Syria.

“We agreed to take all measures to ensure that all parties, including those countries that are present here in Vienna, firmly adhere to the cease-fire. Each side that maintains or influences or equips someone on the battlefield has achieved a cease-fire. We also agreed that pressure would be exerted on the parties to give up weapons (from the supply of weapons to the opposing forces) ", Said John Kerry.
121 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +25
    15 November 2015 09: 04

    "We agreed to take all measures to ensure that all parties, including those countries that are present here in Vienna, adhere to the ceasefire." The Americans themselves did not open fire on the barmaley, they only supplied them with weapons
    1. +47
      15 November 2015 09: 07
      Mr. Kerry is illogical ... Why should Assad buy oil if his country is completely isolated? To whom to sell it, to Russia? (we have our own sea, like Iran) Here France is buying up cheap oil in Libya ..
      1. +13
        15 November 2015 09: 12
        Jim talk about the illogicality! It's ridiculous!
        1. -31
          15 November 2015 09: 19
          Nothing funny. I see this as a proposal by Russia to buy oil there, and instead of a devastating military campaign, to fix things in a torn economy.
          Why fight, if you can build a robust design?
          1. +3
            15 November 2015 09: 35
            Quote: Angro Magno
            I see this as a proposal by Russia to buy oil there, and instead of a devastating military campaign, to fix things in a torn economy.
            Why fight, if you can build a robust design?

            How? Worldwide, the volume of accumulated oil reached 2 billion barrels, the market does not have the demand that was previously
            1. -3
              15 November 2015 11: 38
              If we consider the issue from the point of view of the huckster, which Kerry is clearly at heart, then Putin should give the order to terminate the operation as soon as possible, reduce the export of Russian oil itself, and in return begin to huckle Syrian oil, thereby delaying the date of the inevitable collapse of the economy. And the collapse of our economy is prophesied for this year. So according to Kerry and other tough analysts, Putin has one and a half months left.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. -3
                  15 November 2015 13: 04
                  Kindly, your knowledge of economics amazes me. I dream, someday, to reach at least the foot of the everest of your wisdom.
                  And further. Tell me about the quality of oil, I beg. I always thought that oil has three qualities - solid, liquid and gaseous. But you clearly know more.

                  I have always been pleased by people mentioning Petrosyan. For me, this is the most important marker of a highly intellectual person. I am happy that one of them paid attention to me.
                  1. +3
                    15 November 2015 20: 29
                    Quote: Angro Magno
                    I always thought that oil has three qualities - solid, liquid and gaseous.

                    * Dear *, you don’t need to think, you need to coward. What you listed is not quality, but STATE of oil. Go ..... you learn lessons. fool
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. -6
            15 November 2015 10: 23
            Quote: Emulty
            As I saw the headline, I only got one phrase in my head: "morons, fucking!".
            It’s the same as if Stalin would buy ammunition for the Soviet army from Nazi Germany. Logic is just a wagon.

            It's weird. But a week ago I asked a question, why did Assad and the aerospace forces not bomb ISIS oil and wires - no one answered me
            1. +2
              15 November 2015 10: 38
              Quote: atalef
              Strange.

              Alexander
              give a comment winked
              otherwise Inter "will not take expensive lies"
              http://lystok.com/rf-poboyalas-atakovat-vvs-izrailya-pozvoliv-im-nanesti-aviauda
              r-po-aeroportu-damaska-3250
              1. -4
                15 November 2015 10: 56
                Quote: Dryuya2
                Quote: atalef
                Strange.

                Alexander
                give a comment winked
                otherwise Inter "will not take expensive lies"
                http://lystok.com/rf-poboyalas-atakovat-vvs-izrailya-pozvoliv-im-nanesti-aviauda

                r-po-aeroportu-damaska-3250

                On this occasion, I have already commented, we have agreements with the Russian Federation - they have their own interests, we have our own - no one interferes with each other
            2. +4
              15 November 2015 10: 44
              You can bomb. only then in the adjacent territories will all power plants be installed with the help of which energy water is delivered to residents and to the fields. so this is a shot in the leg
              1. -2
                15 November 2015 10: 54
                Quote: Saber
                You can bomb. only then in the adjacent territories will all power plants be installed with the help of which energy water is delivered to residents and to the fields. so this is a shot in the leg

                Never seen a crude oil power plant
                1. +1
                  15 November 2015 18: 40
                  Have you seen a distillation column? Well, at least you can imagine a moonshine still?
            3. +9
              15 November 2015 11: 00
              You are somehow strange. Why bomb the infrastructure?
              This is to restore then for a lot of money.
              1. 0
                15 November 2015 11: 09
                Quote: McLooka-MacLeod
                You are somehow strange. Why bomb the infrastructure?
                This is to restore then for a lot of money.

                Well, to listen to you - we must continue to give them the opportunity to receive money.
                1. +1
                  15 November 2015 20: 14
                  they receive money from other sources
            4. +4
              15 November 2015 11: 06
              Quote: atalef
              why Assad and the videoconferencing do not bomb ISIS and ISIL wires - no one answered me

              Private property is inviolable, ISIS just "borrowed" these objects and uses them by bombing them, which means then to restore at their own expense, someone is reluctant to get money
              1. -8
                15 November 2015 11: 09
                Quote: sa-ag
                Private property is inviolable, ISIS just "borrowed" these objects and uses them by bombing them, which means then to restore at their own expense, someone is reluctant to get money


                Graceful delirium hi
                1. +4
                  15 November 2015 11: 19
                  Quote: atalef
                  Graceful delirium

                  offer your nonsense, maybe it will be delusional? :-)
                  1. -6
                    15 November 2015 11: 35
                    Quote: sa-ag
                    Quote: atalef
                    Graceful delirium

                    offer your nonsense, maybe it will be delusional? :-)

                    private property in a war that Assad respects?
                    Well, chesslovo, you live in an alternative universe, maybe there are lawsuits for bombed apartments and lost property already being prepared there?
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                  3. +10
                    15 November 2015 11: 54
                    Quote: sa-ag
                    Quote: atalef
                    Graceful delirium

                    offer your nonsense, maybe it will be delusional? :-)

                    As I understand it, comrades from Israel have put me on a blacklist as a whole coder ...! Fear! bully This is very amazing ... laughing bully I do not see them, well, thank God! It's easier to breathe ...
                    1. -3
                      15 November 2015 13: 17
                      Quote: MIKHAN
                      As I understand it, comrades from Israel have put me on a blacklist as a whole coder ...! Fear! This is very lavish ... I do not see them, well, thank God! It's easier to breathe ...

                      Happy early wink
                      1. 0
                        15 November 2015 19: 45
                        Will you calculate by IP?
                    2. 0
                      15 November 2015 19: 44
                      Welcome to our club.
              2. +5
                15 November 2015 14: 15
                Quote: sa-ag
                Quote: atalef
                why Assad and the videoconferencing do not bomb ISIS and ISIL wires - no one answered me

                Private property is inviolable, ISIS just "borrowed" these objects and uses them by bombing them, which means then to restore at their own expense, someone is reluctant to get money

                Actually, there are VERY many misunderstandings here! The USA and its allies did NOT bomb ISIS infrastructure at all, allowing them to earn money: oil fields, bridges, oil carrier caravans, etc. Our bombing began - the bridge over the Euphrates was bombed, but not to dust, but carefully, from the edge, so that it could be restored quickly. And the columns with oil carriers also bombed a couple of times, although there are a fair amount of them every day. It seems that last week the French oil fields bombed (if this is true, of course), and here is the reason for the attacks.
                In general, everything is straightforward, as in Libya - they are fighting, planes bombing, shooting, and they both extracted and extracted oil, and even increase production. And the transfer of crafts from one hand to another does not at all mean the cessation of production.
                It seems that someone strictly instructed you to play war games there, but do not bother grandmothers with serious uncles! what hi
                1. 0
                  15 November 2015 14: 17
                  Or in other words, do not affect the interests of the United States and you will be happy)
                2. +2
                  15 November 2015 18: 08
                  Most likely, the oil infrastructure is not touched by needles just because it should become a bargain in the near future. Here the question should be who contributed to the victory over the villain, but only the villain is the main controller of the black oil market, created far from yesterday and belonging for the most part to the one who roofs and feeds the spiteful villager, even allowing you to have your share of profit. The speculatively low prices of smuggled oil play a role in its world value. very significant harm to countries where the important role of supporting the economy is trading in the world market with black gold, which is divided. If you see, find out, predict, predict, and better find out which global payment system and through which banks money smuggling goes, then it will draw the master of all this is the Sabbath, and the conclusions will need to be made by everyone, otherwise things are full of seams.
              3. +1
                15 November 2015 14: 48
                During the world wars, the warring parties also did not very quickly bomb each other, especially military ....
                1. +2
                  15 November 2015 14: 57
                  Quote: Karlovar
                  During the world wars, the warring parties also did not very quickly bomb each other, especially military ....


                  Are you seriously ?
                  Attacks on oil wells, refineries and oil depots were, however, very successful, and made a big contribution to the overall collapse of the German economy at the end of the war. The main headache of the Minister of Arms Production A. Speer was the bombing of oil facilities; however, this happened quite late, when Germany was already defeated anyway. Nevertheless, it is fair to say that the campaign of bombing oil facilities significantly reduced the duration of the war, thus saving a significant number of human lives

                  so one example closer to the topic.
                  1. +5
                    15 November 2015 17: 09
                    Quote: atalef
                    made a big contribution to the overall collapse of the German economy in the end War.

                    Moreover, factories in the area of ​​responsibility of the USSR were bombed)).
            5. +6
              15 November 2015 11: 26
              Quote: atalef
              and why Assad and the videoconferencing do not bomb the oil exploration and wires of ISIS - I never answered

              Well, you’re not a stupid kind of nation (but rather a prudent one) and you have to figure everything out and calculate for the future.
              So Assad and I are not as stupid as it turns out, and we understand that bombing is easy (this is not our method), and then when we recover it, it will be necessary to restore and pour money. It's simple, but in order not to sell oil you just need to shoot oil tankers and beat buyers on the hands.
              I hope there will be no more stupid questions.
              1. -7
                15 November 2015 11: 38
                Quote: Irokez
                It's simple, but in order not to sell oil you just need to shoot oil tankers and beat the hands of buyers. I hope there will be no more stupid questions.

                Of course it will be, to shoot tankers as you will? Probably a high-precision weapon, the FAB is somehow complicated, I'm not talking about the cost of an hour of an airplane flight - so destroying an oil tanker with oil (financially) will cost more than this tanker with oil costs, you’ll be swept by each run.

                We are talking about money wink
                Not stupid you say laughing
                1. +11
                  15 November 2015 11: 52
                  and so, it will cost more to destroy an oil tanker with oil (financially) than this oil tanker with oil costs, you’ll be tired of running after each.

                  Well, tankers that all the time on the road and the road. They, that do not stand still, are rotting and cannot be tracked from the drone and covered in a standing position.
                  Think Atalef Think and Don't Ask Silly Questions. If only you personally needed you, you would have done so knowing that the oil tower is yours in the future.
                  1. -2
                    15 November 2015 12: 42
                    Quote: Irokez
                    Well, tankers that all the time on the road and the road. They, that do not stand still, are rotting and cannot be tracked from the drone and covered in a standing position


                    Does this reduce the cost of their destruction? Of course, I understand that you think that they all gather together, enclose the area with parking lights, draw a huge cross in the center, with an inscription in Russian - BOMB HERE !!

                    Quote: Irokez
                    Think Atalef Think and Don't Ask Silly Questions. If only you personally needed you, you would have done so knowing that the oil tower is yours in the future.

                    Yes, I’m just doing Tim.
                    1. +5
                      15 November 2015 14: 14
                      Does this reduce the cost of their destruction?

                      Of course. This is not a bombing plant or an oil rig. There is no means of transportation - there is nothing to export oil. Not only current expenses are important, but also future ones (solve the first-class task in the complex of its understanding).
                      I praise you on the right track. The economy must be economical.

                      Yes, I’m doing just that.

                      This makes me happy. Now the next task is to learn to think logically. Discard the eastern logic of the God-chosen people and study again according to the new principles of the logic of the current time. Remember Russia, feel its logic (hint).
                      Dare Atalef dare.
                      1. -5
                        15 November 2015 14: 45
                        Quote: Irokez
                        Of course. This is not a bombing plant or an oil rig.

                        it’s harder to find a new coaster, harder than a new tower or factory. belay

                        Quote: Irokez
                        Not only current expenses are important, but also future ones (solve the first-class task in the complex of its understanding).

                        I don’t understand what are you trying to prove to me? What, in order to stop selling ISIS oil, to bomb a tower or plant, is much harder than chasing each truck separately? fool
                        Quote: Irokez
                        This makes me happy. Now the next task is to learn to think logically. Discard the eastern logic of the God-chosen people and study again according to the new principles of the logic of the current time. Remember Russia, feel its logic (hint

                        steal a box of vodka, sell half the price, and drink the money? - do you mean that? laughing
                      2. +4
                        15 November 2015 15: 45
                        I don’t understand what are you trying to prove to me?

                        It’s not to prove, but to suggest that you don’t need to build a bomb (you don’t need to use this mind), you need to look for other ways, and you have rested factories and towers as if you don’t understand ...

                        steal a box of vodka, sell half the price, and drink the money?

                        This is to Ukraine, through their national channels, turn to Kolomoisky and others like them.

                        Emoticons return back - this is just for you.
              2. +3
                15 November 2015 19: 33
                Quote: Irokez
                Quote: atalef
                and why Assad and the videoconferencing do not bomb the oil exploration and wires of ISIS - I never answered

                Well, you’re not a stupid kind of nation (but rather a prudent one) and you have to figure everything out and calculate for the future.
                So Assad and I are not as stupid as it turns out, and we understand that bombing is easy (this is not our method), and then when we recover it, it will be necessary to restore and pour money. It's simple, but in order not to sell oil you just need to shoot oil tankers and beat buyers on the hands.
                I hope there will be no more stupid questions.


                I agree with you Irokez

                Having removed the economic stimulus, in theory, the militants would have gone ..., well, as having removed the shit, annoying flies would have gone. So removing all oil-producing facilities, as well as the entire industry, it would seem that they would have left. And here it is not, for having done this, these militants themselves would be sent to other industrial countries. Like termites, their mother! Well done Russia and clever at their Head, soak termites and everything that is connected with them. True today with you.
            6. +8
              15 November 2015 11: 52
              Quote: atalef
              Quote: Emulty
              As I saw the headline, I only got one phrase in my head: "morons, fucking!".
              It’s the same as if Stalin would buy ammunition for the Soviet army from Nazi Germany. Logic is just a wagon.

              It's weird. But a week ago I asked a question, why did Assad and the aerospace forces not bomb ISIS oil and wires - no one answered me


              I answer !!! Restore ecology and crafts who will ??? And cutting ISIS from oil is easy. Stop her buying Turkey and others like them. Block accounts that are not controlled by Assad! Does it not seem strange to you that as soon as the Syrian army began to advance towards the northern border (the border with Turkey) and the Russian aerospace forces actively earned there, did the Turks yell about the no-fly zone? This is not even a rebus !!! Everything is on the surface. Facts are added to the ticker automatically. You don’t even have to think.
              1. -6
                15 November 2015 13: 25
                Quote: meriem1
                I answer !!! Restore ecology and crafts who will ???

                This is what Assad cares most about right now belay
                Quote: meriem1
                And cutting ISIS from oil is easy. Stop her buying Turkey and others like them

                those. Are you ready to put this in the hands of Turks interested in oil?
                In general, I somehow thought that it was the interest of Assad and Russia - to deprive ISIS of funding
                Quote: meriem1
                So the Turks screamed about the no-fly zone? This is not even a rebus !!!

                I don’t understand one thing? Who controls the process? Wailing Turks or Assad with the VKS?
                Quote: meriem1
                Facts are added to the ticker automatically. You don’t even have to think

                It is necessary, why ISIS’s oil fields are not bombed, who can physically prevent this?
            7. +4
              15 November 2015 15: 22
              And what is strange ?????? In your opinion, it is better to bomb first and then free and rebuild?
              1. -7
                15 November 2015 15: 35
                Quote: Otshelnik
                And what is strange ?????? In your opinion, it is better to bomb first and then free and rebuild?

                Actually, then generally shoot at ISIS, some of them are citizens of Syria, and adults, with education and specialty --- do not mind? While the new ones grow, they learn how much time will pass?
            8. -1
              15 November 2015 17: 02
              Quote: atalef
              why Assad and the videoconferencing do not bomb ISIL and wires ISIS

              It was reported that the VKS bombed the columns of ISIS fuel trucks. But this measure is necessary - in order to prevent ISIS from refueling the equipment. And bombing oilfields is firstly environmental pollution (remember the fires of 600 pieces of oil wells in Kuwait), and secondly, saving on bombs. And then there will be no need to spend money on restoring the oil infrastructure - it will still be useful to Syria after the destruction of ISIS. The United States also did not bomb Hitler's military factories, where they had previously invested their money.
            9. +1
              15 November 2015 17: 04
              Quote: atalef
              why Assad and the videoconferencing do not bomb ISIL and wires ISIS

              Perhaps they want to reduce the cost of restoring production?))
            10. mvg
              -1
              15 November 2015 18: 09
              Maybe because they also then restore these mines? And the equipment is mainly western. And we have sanctions .. There is hope that we take whole ..
              PS: Why does the NATO "coalition" not bomb? Are you worried about the environment?
              1. +1
                15 November 2015 19: 22
                Quote: mvg
                There is hope that we take it whole ..

                seriously? Hope? Yes, they even blew up the monuments, and the oil towers will save for Assad, of course, ISIS’s best friend?
            11. +1
              15 November 2015 20: 12
              and coalition forces bombed them for 3 years ?. maybe Assad himself asked? this is what no infrastructure
          2. +3
            15 November 2015 10: 31
            Quote: Emulty
            I saw the headline,

            but I have this (to put it mildly, I don’t like it)
            Going to reporters at the end of the negotiations, Kerry said that the parties agreed to take measures to ensure a ceasefire in Syria.

            this is what it turns out will give the "shaitans" to leave - to lick their wounds, rearm, etc. ??????
            but what about "we came, not to help Assad, but to fight the terrorists" - or is there "blackmail" by the Donbass ?????
            muddy this is a matter of politics negative
      2. +13
        15 November 2015 09: 58
        Everyone is buying oil from the IG. And Assad, and Erdogan, and Iraq, and all neighboring states. The reason is simple and banal is the price. In the case of Assad, all oil refining capacities are under his control, and he does not control most of the fields. But the war and the economy of this very oil need oh how much. It’s just that Kerry only says that it’s profitable if he lands on Erdogan or Iraq in this way, the United States will have problems, and running into Assad is their favorite pastime.
      3. +2
        15 November 2015 10: 27
        Assad really buys. There is an indirect scheme, but he has nowhere to go. Vicious circle. He has no other actually. Until control is restored.
      4. +2
        15 November 2015 10: 34
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Illogical Mr. Kerry ...

        what kind of logic can we talk about ?! it's just diplomacy
        A diplomat is a person who openly says things that he does not think.
        (Giovanni Guareschi)
      5. +1
        15 November 2015 10: 41
        Entered the role of Jim Carrey from "Bruce Almighty" and still lives in it !!!
        one word !
      6. +4
        15 November 2015 11: 22
        Hello dear!
        Well, if Assad, buys oil from igil.
        That hoofed-Obama buys marijuana in Amsterdam.
        And what thesis is more obsessed
        They will decide for you dear Forum4ane !!!
        1. 0
          15 November 2015 14: 20
          Quote: marinier
          Well, if Assad, buys oil from igil.
          That hoofed-Obama buys marijuana in Amsterdam.
          And what thesis is more obsessed

          Judging by the fact that you, Entoni, have been instructed with minuses, someone really believes that Assad buys ISIS oil, and Obama does not indulge in marijuana!
          True, judging by the behavior of Obama, there is not marijuana, but smacks of something more picky!
          1. +1
            15 November 2015 19: 22
            Good time of the day, Dear!
            Judge everything. You're right.
            Logs4no.
      7. +5
        15 November 2015 11: 34
        the parties agreed to take measures to ensure a ceasefire in Syria.


        What some vague suspicions of trying to save the IG when he outlined kirdyk. Like freeze until better times? This means that a large territory of Syria, together with infrastructure and supplies, will be under terrorists. Strange as that. belay
      8. +1
        15 November 2015 11: 55
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Illogical Mr. Kerry ..

        ---------------------
        In the key "Assad must leave" Kerry is quite logical, although he himself does not notice that in public his "logic" looks like a fur inside ...
        1. +2
          15 November 2015 14: 56
          This is not logic, these are continuous Wishlist ...
      9. +1
        15 November 2015 13: 26
        Quote: MIKHAN
        ) Here France is buying up cheap oil in Libya ..


        The main buyer of oil from IS is Turkey (buys at a price of $ 15-25 per barrel), to which IS is actually a gift. At the same time, Turkey is a NATO member, i.e. his "son of a bitch" for the US and the EU, who can not be touched (there are bases and jump airfields). Thus, IS is a natural supplier of NATO, which pays for IS services. Here is such a parsley. Yes
      10. 0
        15 November 2015 14: 42
        It's simple. Kerry has diarrhea, including verbal diarrhea .... Diarrhea is a symptom of an imbalance in the digestive tract and not only, diarrhea can be hysterical ...
    2. +5
      15 November 2015 09: 09
      Kerry's statements only confirm the correctness of Lavrov’s statement. Assad buys raw materials from the enemy and thereby strengthens it? Well this is unlikely. Another verbiage of the head of the State Department.
      1. +16
        15 November 2015 09: 15
        Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS

        Spherical debil in vacuum ....
        1. 0
          15 November 2015 15: 27
          The terrible thing is that huge power is in the hands of such idiots !!
      2. +8
        15 November 2015 09: 44
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Assad buys raw materials from the enemy and thereby strengthens it?

        Did Kerry stand nearby and personally counted the money? laughing
        1. +2
          15 November 2015 13: 44
          Quote: Egoza
          Did Kerry stand nearby and personally counted the money?


          Hello Lena.
          Here (for the State Department) the main thing is to crow, and there - at least don't dawn. "Test tube" syndrome.
          Vaughn, despite the common REAL threats, Clintonsha immediately burst out declaring Russia and China the main threats to the United States. In short, the "trilateral commission" of which the Clinton clan is a member is in action.
          (cry.)
      3. +1
        15 November 2015 10: 35
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Assad

        Assad feel
    3. +12
      15 November 2015 09: 18
      In Kerry’s old half-fool, it seems that two medical institutions are led by a psychiatric hospital and a nursing home, it’s scary that this one is vested with power, it will do more and how many people still have to die due to the fault of these striped cattle.
      1. +7
        15 November 2015 09: 23
        We would better remember how the Turks quite openly buy penniless oil from the IG ...
    4. +1
      15 November 2015 09: 34
      Quote: Svyatogor
      I do not understand something, ISIS can no longer be wet?

      Are you visually impaired or headache? Where did you see ISIS representatives at a meeting in Vienna ???
      PS Again, a "stupid" comment and a bunch of pluses to it!
      1. BMW
        +1
        15 November 2015 09: 47
        Quote: Author
        We also agreed that pressure would be exerted on the parties to renounce weapons (from supplying weapons to the opposing forces) ”

        Here, either the translation is inaccurate, or officially admitted that the ISs are supplying weapons.
        Was there a reaction to this phrase or not
      2. +1
        15 November 2015 10: 23
        Quote: Homo
        Where did you see representatives of ISIS at a meeting in Vienna ???

        Qatar was there? If there was, then they are these same representatives of the IG.
        1. 0
          15 November 2015 15: 52
          Quote: Sid.74
          Qatar was there? If there was, then they are these same representatives of the IG.

          You are an adult (I hope). Do not put everything in a heap. There are people representing the state (having the right to sign), and that was the subject of discussion. And who is lobbying for someone, this is completely different.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    5. mihasik
      +6
      15 November 2015 10: 00
      Quote: Svyatogor
      I do not understand something, ISIS can no longer be wet? The Americans themselves didn’t open fire on barmaley, only they were supplied with weapons

      The Americans simply recognized at the official level that ISIS is their project and now the United States officially fits in for them.
      In this regard, the question. But is this not a confirmation that the towers of Gemini, the USA themselves, were blown up to justify terror around the world?
    6. Tor5
      0
      15 November 2015 10: 58
      A very, very strange, unsubstantiated statement.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      15 November 2015 09: 49
      As in kindergarten, by God they themselves buy through the Turks, and they bring everything down to Assad. Mediocre nonsense and a point.
    2. mihasik
      0
      15 November 2015 12: 28
      Quote: iza top
      Kerya Assad mixed with Erdogan

      In the photo with Lavrov, the first word in his quote is also abusive or not tolerant according to the interpretation of the VO admins. At least when writing it, it is automatically translated as not smart).
      Although there is a clear definition of this "dirty" word:
      What is a “moron” and what does it mean? The meaning and interpretation of the term in dictionaries and encyclopedias:
      The psychological dictionary.
      Moron stupid, stupid. A person suffering from congenital mental underdevelopment - oligophrenia (in a relatively mild degree). And if in short, moron.
      Although right now the Admins for some reason missed it as it is),
  3. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 05
    Someone is lying !!!! Definitely!
  4. +4
    15 November 2015 09: 06
    ravings of a madman. Did he even understand what he said?
    1. +5
      15 November 2015 09: 13
      Quote: asadov
      Did he even understand what he said?

      The classics of the genre: "Accusation of the innocent and rewarding of the uninvolved" do not change their principles.
    2. +1
      15 November 2015 09: 18
      Quote: asadov
      ravings of a madman. Did he even understand what he said?

      This one knows what he says .... Look here .. [media = http: //cs627516.vk.me/v627516958/358b4/lSaRbmUQCOo.jpg]
  5. +6
    15 November 2015 09: 08
    It’s like in the Donbass, the militias, that is, the Russian troops are firing themselves.
  6. +1
    15 November 2015 09: 08
    The Americans provide weapons to the IG.
  7. +4
    15 November 2015 09: 09
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Mr. Kerry is illogical ... Why should Assad buy oil if his country is completely isolated? To whom to sell it, to Russia? (we have our own sea, like Iran)

    So it’s purely Amer’s - to shift the blame on another. What they themselves sin (and Turkey for sure), Assad is blamed for that.
    1. +3
      15 November 2015 09: 11
      Quote: mamont5
      So it’s purely Amer’s - to shift the blame on another.

      Typical infantilism and low mind ...
  8. +3
    15 November 2015 09: 10
    All Caliphate oil exports go through Ceyhan. No other route exists for purely technical reasons - this is the only pipeline network available to the Caliphate ... Yes, and if it does, then why, then, in the year of bombing, the US and its allies did not bomb a single oil field !?
    1. 0
      15 November 2015 11: 13
      Quote: AlexTires
      Yes, and if it sells, then why then in the year of bombing the United States and the Allies did not bomb a single oil field !?

      Bombed
      The allies struck 13 airstrikes on 12 modular oil refining complexes in the territory of Syria on Syria. The results of the bombing are estimated, but now we can say that they were successful, reports Interfax.

      Islamists use oil refineries to process petroleum products and then sell them on the black market. The capacity of the complexes is estimated at 300-500 barrels per day. According to various estimates, the Islamic State receives a daily profit of up to $ 2 million.


      Read more on NTV.Ru: http://www.ntv.ru/novosti/1220936/?fb#ixzz3rXuHf2if

      this is a year ago.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  9. +4
    15 November 2015 09: 10
    Quote: asadov
    ravings of a madman. Did he even understand what he said?

    Psaki used to rave more, but now paranoia spread to the boss ... Marazmatik ... am
  10. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 12
    Kerry has been sick with psaking for a long time: a complete discrepancy between reality!
  11. +2
    15 November 2015 09: 13
    Who did not understand, Kerry had in mind that this is the prerogative of the states to buy oil from ig ..
  12. +1
    15 November 2015 09: 14
    This Kerry is sick in her head, there’s nothing more to add. wassat fool
    1. +3
      15 November 2015 14: 05
      Quote: igor1981
      This Kerry is sick full head


      What did you want from a former hippie? Aged? -yes, stupid? - yes - it’s time to rest.
  13. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 15
    Keri, you lied !!!!
  14. +1
    15 November 2015 09: 16
    ... Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS "just some kind of" buy-sell "Kerry himself understands what he says crying
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +10
    15 November 2015 09: 20
    Here the Americans are lighting up. Assad buys oil from ISIS, the message is clear - Syria is financing terrorists. Still a little and Assad Americans will accuse of organizing ISIS .............. laughing
  17. +1
    15 November 2015 09: 21
    Someone buys oil, but this is definitely not Assad. The mattress covers are completely lying.
  18. +5
    15 November 2015 09: 22
    It seems not from a hangover, but nifiga did not understand in the morning that Kerry said:
    ...Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS...

    So sells or buys?

    ... the parties agreed to take measures to ensure a ceasefire in Syria ... Each party that supports or has an influence or supplies someone on the battlefield has achieved a ceasefire. We also agreed that pressure would be exerted on the parties to renounce weapons (from the supply of weapons to the opposing forces...

    Not only did he directly say that the countries present at the meeting supply arms and influence the warring parties (that is, fan the war against the legitimate government - they don’t deliver weapons to Syria), it’s also the feeling that the igilovites were present at the meeting and he I agreed with them. About the ceasefire. And then, comrades igilovtsy, live peacefully: you are a peaceful state recognized by all in the world, we won’t shoot at you, and you don’t shoot at us. request (sarcasm)
    No, I really think badly in the morning.
  19. +1
    15 November 2015 09: 26
    Do not make noise. For the classic says that Americans have the right to be stupid. And clinical liars, apparently, too. All this fits into the outline of American democracy, but outside the United States it is completely not perceived. fool
  20. +8
    15 November 2015 09: 27
    There is a big bazaar in Syria. Merchants come to the territory occupied by IS, buy oil products there, go to the territory controlled by Assad and sell. Such a scheme, knowing the eastern mentality, is quite possible. To accuse Assad of such trade is a blatant lie. But westerners do not need to strain the remnants of their brain. They said - "chipmunk - bird" - let it fly! Told Kerry that Assad finances IS - a gentleman should be taken at his word. Theater of the absurd!
  21. +1
    15 November 2015 09: 28
    I remember how in 2013, some experts and journalists encouraged the public that the coming to replace Clinton, such a "specialist in the East" as Kerry, inspires optimism. And where did he go, this optimism? Probably to the same place as the belief in the Shnobel Peace Prize, awarded in absentia to another "dove of the world" or "blue world".
    I remember how this optimist said in January 2013: - "The level of proposals made by Yanukovych is still insufficient for reforms." Where is Yanukovych, where are the reforms and where is Ukraine?
  22. +2
    15 November 2015 09: 30
    There is only one conclusion: Americans and corporations will never go off the rails of building chaos. At stake is control of world wealth. The United States (as the base of corporations) will not refuse the opportunity to parasitize. This is Khazaria of the XNUMXst century. And only Svyatoslav managed to deal with the Khazars in a simple, grandfathering way - complete destruction. And there is no other way.
    1. 0
      15 November 2015 15: 08
      The whole joke is that in the United States at the helm and feeders and sit the descendants of the residents of the Khazars ....
  23. +2
    15 November 2015 09: 31
    The article is not complete. Lavrov’s answer is not voiced here. And he said, in fact, everyone knows who and how much is buying oil from the IG. Presumably, he had in mind primarily Turkey, but did not voice it before the meeting of the 20 matches in Antalya.
  24. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 31
    (Assad) became a magnet for them (terrorist groups in Syria)


    Yeah. Then Parisalso
  25. +4
    15 November 2015 09: 35
    Kerry is a professional liar who puts everything upside down. This scumbag is a living embodiment of Satanism.
    He is trying to blame Assad for what the United States is committing - in collaboration with ISIS.
    And the mistakes and inability to lead the country, the political impotent Obama, he is trying to ascribe to Hafez al-Assad.
    His task is to demonize the leader of Syria, who cannot win the war.
    1. 0
      15 November 2015 15: 11
      Moreover, this technique, adopted by the Anglo-Saxons, was not invented by the Anglo-Saxons, but by their "advisers" ....
  26. +4
    15 November 2015 09: 36
    I. What happens? We successfully bombed ISIS, the Syrians are advancing and conquering more and more territories, and here it is on you .... a truce! fool This is probably for that. so that many could escape, but very much the "shitheads" were able to reform. Well, not absurd? recourse
    1. +1
      15 November 2015 09: 52
      Quote: afrikanez
      I. What happens? We successfully bombed ISIS, the Syrians are advancing and conquering more and more territories, and here it is on you .... a truce! fool This is probably for that. so that many could escape, but very much the "shitheads" were able to reform. Well, not absurd? recourse

      Like in Donbass last summer. Only exactly the opposite. There were "terrorist-separatyst" against the "legitimate" junta, but here there was a "progressive moderate opposition" against the "illegitimate" Assad.
    2. 0
      15 November 2015 10: 19
      "Strategy, however ..."
    3. 0
      15 November 2015 15: 12
      In the Donbass with a Debaltsev boiler, the same story was ....
  27. +3
    15 November 2015 09: 37
    Well, why is it not clear? Oil fields are now at the IG. If you accept the ceasefire, Syria will never get them and their territory back, and the IS will dig up new bases and arrange a new revolution somewhere else with oil money. That would somehow incite them to Qatar, so that their own owners would be bitten.
  28. +5
    15 November 2015 09: 37
    Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS

    In Kerry, a brechet !!! The whole world knows that the USA and Turkey are the main buyers of oil from ISIS!
  29. +3
    15 November 2015 09: 39
    Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS, ”the Secretary of State said at a meeting of foreign ministers in Vienna.


    Nonsense is complete, from the beginning I would have thought, and then talked.
    1. 0
      15 November 2015 10: 21
      Carrie and co have long been "bullshit" ...
  30. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 40
    “We agreed to take all measures to ensure that all parties, including those countries that are present here in Vienna, adhere to the ceasefire. Each side that supports or influences or supplies someone on the battlefield has achieved a ceasefire. They also agreed that pressure would be put on the parties to renounce weapons (to supply the opposing forces with weapons), ”said John Kerry.
    It seems he didn’t drink, but ISIL read a friend and brother. Kerry's head doesn’t hurt or spin. fool
  31. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 41
    Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS "

    It is necessary to blurt out this.
    Bashar al-Assad, Russian aircraft repaired you kerosene from us buy nada yes
  32. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 43
    And what to do when, first of all, the "babakhs" cut, cleared the country, seized oil-bearing regions, areas with electric substations, cut off the supply of water, food, etc.? Therefore, you have to buy everything that is captured and electric energy as well. Not only that, in order to at least somehow maintain contact with the occupied areas, salaries are paid to officials in the occupied territories. The country is a well-oiled mechanism, with transport logistics and interdependence, and everything is being done so that the civilian population has at least minimal access to food, fuel, energy supply, Syria lives. Bashar leads a more loyal policy than the same "Ukrainians" at Nenko.
  33. +1
    15 November 2015 09: 47
    Quote: AlexTires
    ... Yes, and if it sells, then why, then, in a year of bombing, the United States and its allies did not bomb a single oil field !?

    Yes, for the same reason that Dresden was bombed in the 45th, and not some ball-bearing factories. request
  34. +1
    15 November 2015 09: 49
    Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS - said the Secretary of State
    He also called Obama an earthworm, ”said Mowgli. Already do not know what to come up with. We switched to fairy tales.
  35. +2
    15 November 2015 09: 49
    We have long been waiting for the United States to start shaking with a test tube .... And here it is.
    1. 0
      15 November 2015 15: 17
      This time in the test tube there will be a certain dark oily liquid ... She will shake ... who is their Minister of Defense today?
  36. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 53
    I didn't get it. What is this ceasefire? Carrie suggests we stop killing terrorists? Apparently I felt sorry for my "kids". Not for that raised.
  37. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 54
    “The situation is such that it was he (Assad) who became a magnet for them (terrorist groups in Syria) ...”
  38. 0
    15 November 2015 09: 55
    maybe Assad and the terrorist attacks in France to blame ??
    1. 0
      15 November 2015 15: 18
      I won’t be surprised if something like that blurs ...
  39. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      15 November 2015 11: 35
      "You washed your hands from the blood devil ..?"

      Blood is not washed ...
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. +2
    15 November 2015 10: 02
    Quote: Baikonur
    Jim talk about the illogicality! It's ridiculous!

    the main problem of coconuts, they still think that around are idiots. It used to work, since people were really stupid, admiring America.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  42. 0
    15 November 2015 10: 11
    Quote: yushch
    Everyone is buying oil from the IG. And Assad, and Erdogan, and Iraq, and all neighboring states. The reason is simple and banal is the price. In the case of Assad, all oil refining capacities are under his control, and he does not control most of the fields. But the war and the economy of this very oil need oh how much. It’s just that Kerry only says that it’s profitable if he lands on Erdogan or Iraq in this way, the United States will have problems, and running into Assad is their favorite pastime.


    ???????????????? new kerry?
    1. 0
      15 November 2015 15: 20
      Parents gave him the wrong name, I had to call Jimmy ...
  43. +3
    15 November 2015 10: 14
    Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS

    Interesting situation. I can directly see how Assad, trading in the east, sells IG oil at a lower price, and then buys from them at an inflated price. Otherwise, what is the use of IG. Only an American could blurt out such stupidity, and a European could enthusiastically pick it up and smash it further.
  44. -2
    15 November 2015 10: 34
    everyone buys oil from the igil, there’s nothing personal, just business. everyone needs oil, the cheaper - the better. igil gives the best price.
    and Kiev from the Donbass coal is not shipped?
    war is war, but you always want to eat. but you need money to eat, you won’t be fed up with humanitarian columns alone, especially since you don’t eat much ammunition.
  45. 0
    15 November 2015 10: 50
    it’s hard to imagine Assad with a bag of dough behind him and an ibliss going to the nearest oil rig to bargain for each barrel of oil for military equipment. But pin. to dos is easier. their tankers pump oil from Iraq pipelines.
  46. -1
    15 November 2015 10: 57
    Well, and that the United States purchased from Russia after 1917 the looted and blood-soaked values ​​(gold, antiques, etc., etc.) of individuals and churches. Assad buys its own oil from the Syrian fields captured by the Iglovtsy.
  47. 0
    15 November 2015 11: 16
    "We agreed to take all measures to ensure ... that the countries present here in Vienna adhere to the ceasefire." wink
    So, probably, according to the mattresses, the statement following the meeting should look like.
  48. The comment was deleted.
  49. 0
    15 November 2015 12: 29
    Quote: sa-ag
    Quote: Angro Magno
    I see this as a proposal by Russia to buy oil there, and instead of a devastating military campaign, to fix things in a torn economy.
    Why fight, if you can build a robust design?

    How? Worldwide, the volume of accumulated oil reached 2 billion barrels, the market does not have the demand that was previously

    So what? With a consumption of 100 million barrels per day, this is a 20-day supply. If something sways - he will leave.
  50. +1
    15 November 2015 12: 29
    igil pops, Americans save
  51. 0
    15 November 2015 13: 35
    Whose cow would moo, yours would be silent! am It's too late to fold...
  52. 0
    15 November 2015 13: 43
    Kerry uses heavy substances...
  53. The comment was deleted.
  54. 0
    15 November 2015 15: 27
    And Kerry, it turns out, has read Gogol.... Vaughn, like the phrase from The Inspector General, “The non-commissioned officer lied to you, as if I had flogged her; She's lying, by God she's lying. She flogged herself,” he changed his face.
  55. 0
    15 November 2015 15: 47
    Another invention of the United States in order to pour an extra bucket of dirt on Assad.
    And Syrian oil most likely goes to Turkey and Israel (and through them possibly to Europe) as the main defenders and sponsors of the bandits operating there.
  56. 0
    15 November 2015 16: 25
    There is only 1 “sensation” in the article - trading in cheap oil. But the author did not mention the “elephant”.
    The Syrians have been given 18 months to write a new Constitution and prepare for elections. Assad really haunts the Merikos
    How can elections take place after a ceasefire in territory now controlled by IS?
  57. 0
    15 November 2015 17: 11
    Dumb is even dumber. Judging by their statements, one can put an equal sign between the title of their film and the essence of US policy. Well, it’s funny to listen to the right word.
  58. 0
    15 November 2015 18: 50
    "Assad sells oil, buys oil from ISIS," the secretary of state said. Are you a moron Carey, decide, the President of SYRIA, BASHAR ASAD, is selling oil or buying oil??. Another pearl "Kerry said that the parties agreed to take measures to ensure a ceasefire in Syria." To do this, it is necessary to destroy the source of all ills on a planetary scale, lice and their mongrels. and finally, lice Israel and their mongrels are trying to pin all their crimes on the respected BASHARA ASADA. Well, the question is when will the world tribunal on the crimes committed by these civilizers-sewers
  59. 0
    15 November 2015 19: 19
    US Secretary of State John Kerry accused Bashar al-Assad of buying oil from the Islamic State.
    Whose cow would moo: In 1942, the US Standard Oil Corporation traded fuel with Germany through neutral Switzerland and the fuel intended for the allies was received by their enemy. See http://www.sdelanounih.ru/charlz-xajem-torgovlya-s-vragom-kak-amerika-pomogala-g


    itleru /
    Or is Kerry acting on the proverb “what is permitted to Jupiter is not permitted to the bull”?
  60. The comment was deleted.
  61. +1
    15 November 2015 20: 29
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: McLooka-MacLeod
    You are somehow strange. Why bomb the infrastructure?
    This is to restore then for a lot of money.

    Well, to listen to you - we must continue to give them the opportunity to receive money.

    Very revealing two views on one problem.

    Interestingly, do our new patriots know that during the Second World War there was more destruction from the Soviet army than from the Germans? We even have a saying: “Beat your own so that strangers will be afraid.”
    That is, for that country of ours there were fundamental things that could not be the subject of discussion or bargaining. Victory at any cost! Any...

    Now there are no restrictions for discussion and trade... Everything is determined by benefit.

    I don't even give ratings, it's pointless. It’s just that our country at this historical moment exists simultaneously in at least two realities.
    Look now, some are proud of any success of the country, while others immediately count the money how much it cost us. These realities will never unite into something common.

    Personally, I don’t like both of them, one is boring, the other is annoying at the price, and everywhere on top sits a beast hungry for money or power (there is a slight difference).
    But if I had to choose, like our grandfathers at 41, then I would go for the Reds. Moreover, at first I felt what the Reds were, and only much later was I able to formulate why. I like their dreams and therefore there is timid hope... But the other side has nothing ahead, emptiness...
    After all, why did the USSR launch the first cosmonaut into space? It is clear that the United States, which profited from the war, could have done this before without much strain. But it just didn't occur to them...
  62. 0
    15 November 2015 20: 59
    Quote: Peresvet_613
    Kerry uses heavy substances...

    I would like to continue - digging from him for such a matter from different countries. And all from leaders.
  63. 0
    16 November 2015 03: 29
    I don’t know why they smoke like that in America. But the fool is definitely crying for them.
    God grant Lavrov patience, otherwise listening to such nonsense every day and trying to somehow negotiate with the obvious clients of the ward for the “violent” is still a lot of work.
  64. 0
    16 November 2015 07: 23
    An instructive event occurred during the period of “perestroika” - an interview was organized on TV with Margaret Thatcher, leading political commentators at the time. Our “monsters of political review” tried to explain something to the “Iron Lady” about Soviet international policy, seemingly well-reasoned, but like “waves on a breakwater.”
    “There are two points of view in the world: “mine” and “wrong”!!!”

    And now - like Zadornov....