Military Review

RF can supply Saudi Arabian weapons for $ 10 billion

96
Currently, Russian companies are working on a package of contracts for the supply of Saudi Arabia weapons for $ 10 billion, which should be prepared for the visit of the head of state al-Saud, reports RIA News message newspaper "Vedomosti".




“King of Saudi Arabia Salman ibn Abdel-Aziz al-Saud may visit Moscow in late November and a package of contracts for the supply of up to $ 10 billion to the Russian kingdom is already being prepared for his visit”- said in a statement.

The publication reminds that "the head of the Ministry of Defense of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, who visited the Army-2015 forum and the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, became interested in the Iskander tactical missile system."

Earlier, the head of Rosoboronexport, Anatoly Isaikin, stated that the company "considers the countries of the Persian Gulf as promising partners in the field of military-technical cooperation." According to the director general, these “countries are currently assessing which technology, European, American or Russian, is most needed by their armed forces.”
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. fox21h
    fox21h 11 November 2015 11: 23 New
    54
    Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.
    1. Bombardier
      Bombardier 11 November 2015 11: 26 New
      30
      Better directly ISIS (without intermediaries in the form of CA) - they will pay .. wassat
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 11 November 2015 11: 38 New
        19
        Capitalism is his mother! Che wonder!
        "There is no crime that capital would not have committed for profit!"
        (Karl Marx, Capital)
        And our "capitalists" liberalists do not shun anything at all, explaining this as good for the state!
        There is no question of honor at all!
        1. bulvas
          bulvas 11 November 2015 11: 43 New
          11
          Quote: Baikonur
          Capitalism is his mother! Che wonder!
          "There is no crime that capital would not have committed for profit!"
          (Karl Marx, Capital)
          And our "capitalists" do not shun anything! There is no question of honor at all!


          Will it be better if the capitalists of other countries sell?

          Are we so generous and rich that we are ready to give the contract and profit to the USA, China, Israel?

          They will make a profit in the form of taxes.
          Their specialists will receive an incentive for development
          Their intelligence will gain control on weapons

          Will it be better?

          1. mihasik
            mihasik 11 November 2015 11: 56 New
            0
            Quote: bulvas
            Will it be better if the capitalists of other countries sell?
            Foreign state will receive profit in the form of taxes
            Foreign specialists will receive an incentive for development
            Foreign intelligence will gain control on weapons
            Will it be better?


            They already wrote here. So sell immediately, directly to ISIS and our instructors in addition, so that our planes are shot down! No, but what ?!
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 11 November 2015 12: 04 New
              +6
              Quote: mihasik
              They already wrote here. So sell immediately, directly to ISIS and our instructors in addition, so that our planes are shot down! No, but what ?!


              What to sell ISIS? Iskanders?

              And then shoot down planes?

              Who has not realized that besides Russia there are other arms suppliers in the world

              To give them the market - in today's conditions, is tantamount to betrayal and sabotage







              1. mihasik
                mihasik 11 November 2015 12: 13 New
                +5
                Quote: bulvas
                ut already written. So sell immediately, directly to ISIS and our instructors in addition, so that our planes are shot down! No, but what ?!

                What to sell ISIS? Iskanders?

                And the Iskanders will go, and why not? On the aviation base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria, "whack", eh? We ourselves write in TTX-100% defeat of the target, “Iskanders” do not go astray. The Russian Federation will sell them to SA, the SA will sell them to Qatar and the USA, and they will deliver them to ISIS and voila!) Hello, base of the air forces! Money doesn't smell, right?
                For example, in the Second World War it would have looked cool: Stalin would have sold Hitler a batch of Katyushas and T-34 tanks. S * ka, the people’s brains turned upside down. The Saudis sponsored the attacks in Russia, and Russia is selling weapons to them in gratitude!
                1. bulvas
                  bulvas 11 November 2015 12: 20 New
                  -1
                  Quote: mihasik
                  And the Iskanders will go, and why not? Money doesn’t smell, right? It would be cool for example in the Second World War: Stalin would sell Hitler a batch of Katyushas and T-34 tanks. S * ka, the people’s brains turned upside down. The Saudis sponsored the attacks in Russia, and Russia is selling weapons to them in gratitude!



                  That some part
                  people's brains turned upside down
                  and have not yet taken their place - that's right.

                  Fortunately, today these issues are solved by people more adequate.

                  Just in case: there is such a thing - the economy.
                  It must be profitable.
                  Without this, there is no army, no weapons, no pensions.

                  If there is none of this, there is no country




                  1. mihasik
                    mihasik 11 November 2015 12: 32 New
                    +2
                    Fortunately, today these issues are solved by people more adequate.
                    Just in case: there is such a thing - the economy.
                    It must be profitable.
                    Without this, there is no army, no weapons, no pensions.
                    If there is none of this, there is no country

                    So I propose to the “adequate” people: sell ISIS directly. Earn money for the economy "babos" and a mountain of corpses in addition! People will appreciate your economic benefit.
                2. just exp
                  just exp 11 November 2015 12: 30 New
                  +2
                  but tell me - how many weapons did Russia sell to Saudi Arabia?
                3. kaluganew
                  kaluganew 11 November 2015 12: 31 New
                  +6
                  Do not make up. A strike by iskanders on the base of our flyers means a retaliatory strike, including tactical nuclear weapons. This is direct aggression. The Saudis are not so dumb to live with a lot of money, and then go to the dustbin of history.

                  ISIS babahs need birds, MANPADS and other toys, not complex systems. They are already getting them from sponsors.

                  If a contract is being worked out with the Saudis, then there are non-proliferation decisions. Here, many write about the greed and stupidity of our traders, forgetting that economic ties and interests are the best "glue" between states.

                  Here, another danger flashes, the transfer of US technology. But I sincerely doubt that they do not know the performance characteristics of our products that will be sold to the Arabs. So not a bad deal)
                  1. mihasik
                    mihasik 11 November 2015 13: 07 New
                    +1
                    Quote: kaluganew
                    Do not make up. A strike by iskanders on the base of our flyers means a retaliatory strike, including tactical nuclear weapons. This is direct aggression. The Saudis are not so dumb to live with a lot of money, and then go to the dustbin of history.

                    Yah?
                    And direct sponsorship of terrorist attacks in the Russian Federation was not considered direct aggression? How did the Russian Federation respond? What retaliation? It’s only in the cinema that the terrorist bases in Qatar are spread by our “Swans”).
                    And if the CA sells them to the United States (by the way, who can stop them), and they put them in ISIS, how did Polish and Czech tanks supply the USA with banderlogs in Ukraine? For whom will the Russian Federation "answer"? And will he answer at all? Medvedev here has already stated that the Third World War in the XNUMXst century is impossible. Those. there will be no "answers" if our "watering" begins? And you are talking about some kind of "retaliatory" attacks, especially TNW.
                    1. kaluganew
                      kaluganew 11 November 2015 16: 50 New
                      +1
                      Right We are so clogged. They didn’t give Georgia the teeth, and is Crimea now flying the flag of Ukraine too? And the North wind did not blow in the east of Ukraine.

                      It’s not always possible to play with a saber, sometimes you need to play the fool.

                      A fart in the form of Czech tanks helped the Ukrainians a lot?

                      Could this be the reason why there is not enough MANPADS in the Baboons yet?

                      And the fact that the SA sponsored the war in Chechnya and owes us a favor - I agree 100%. But we also fought with the Germans at one time ....
                4. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 11 November 2015 14: 07 New
                  0
                  Do not write nonsense, nor whoever heavy armored vehicles, much less the PTRC ISIS will not deliver, maximum ATGM and MANPADS.
                5. Altona
                  Altona 11 November 2015 14: 15 New
                  -1
                  Quote: mihasik
                  And the Iskanders will go, and why not? On the aviation base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria, "whack", eh? We ourselves write in TTX-100% defeat of the target, “Iskanders” do not go astray. The Russian Federation will sell them to SA, the SA will sell them to Qatar and the USA, and they will deliver them to ISIS and voila!) Hello, base of the air forces! Money doesn't smell, right?

                  ------------------------
                  You are really describing an extraordinary case. Such offensive weapons are hardly sold, secondly, there is a list of weapons, the supply of which is limited, thirdly, the Saudis are probably interested in some kind of aircraft and armored vehicles. And the warriors of them are awful. As for ISIS, his army is a workers' and peasants’s, he’s not able to maintain sophisticated equipment ... The captured Abrams cannot master, what can I say ...
                6. nazar_0753
                  nazar_0753 11 November 2015 15: 47 New
                  +1
                  I would like to immediately write for people noted by a special mind.
                  Firstly, with regard to the strike at the air base - from a practical point of view it is impossible. Our designers and manufacturers, as I dare to consider, are by no means fools to rivet export complexes without a certain kind of bookmarks. If the Saudis get it wrong to randomly shoot at the Khmeimim base, for a start the missile simply will not work for its intended purpose (if there are systems that can transmit a signal at a sufficient range, and judging by the air defense cover, there will be no problems with such systems). And then these oil barrels can be grabbed by the horns for a direct attack on the Russian Federation.
                  Secondly, the option of transferring IG complexes is absurd, it is approximately similar to the situation “scratch behind the left ear with the right foot”.
                  A) thugs will not be able to master such a complex complex, this is not AK-74, not Katyusha, and not even T-55;
                  B) even assuming that terrorists can use the Iskander (and we remember that it will not reach the target), it will not be difficult to determine which country gave the complex to terrorists and trained them in management if you are over 10 years old and you Do not suffer from Down syndrome. And this is a direct aiding of the groups officially recognized by the UN as terrorist.
                  Thirdly, the characteristics of the export option are greatly reduced, often several times, therefore, the threat of Russia from this complex tends to zero.
                  Fourth, the flow of money into the economy has always been extremely important. Moreover, the money received (for the most part, I hope) will probably go to the same defense orders. Using a comparison that is close to you, we sell 50 pieces of BT-2 to produce 25 pieces of T-34 for ourselves. I don’t think that now the authorities would often and for a long time want to get into the people’s pockets, swaying discontent. And how else to get us full-fledged OTRK?
                  In general, I believe that the sale of Iskander-E, provided that the majority of the proceeds go to orders for the defense industry or other government purposes, is only a plus.
                  Best regards hi
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. atalef
                atalef 11 November 2015 12: 22 New
                +2
                Quote: bulvas
                It has not even come to anyone's knowledge that besides Russia, there are other arms suppliers in the world. To give them the market is in today's conditions tantamount to betrayal and sabotage.

                so why not sell Poroshenko or Georgia? Or the Taliban?
                1. kaluganew
                  kaluganew 11 November 2015 12: 33 New
                  0
                  with the listed persons we fought with no Saudi
                2. bulvas
                  bulvas 11 November 2015 12: 40 New
                  +2
                  Quote: atalef
                  so why not sell Poroshenko or Georgia? Or the Taliban?



                  They don’t have money for weapons, but they, unlike real buyers, don’t ask, but what we ask for - gas, coal - we sell
                  1. atalef
                    atalef 11 November 2015 12: 45 New
                    +1
                    Quote: bulvas
                    Quote: atalef
                    so why not sell Poroshenko or Georgia? Or the Taliban?



                    They don’t have money for weapons, but they, unlike real buyers, don’t ask, but what we ask for - gas, coal - we sell

                    And if it were?
                  2. atalef
                    atalef 11 November 2015 12: 45 New
                    +2
                    Quote: bulvas
                    Quote: atalef
                    so why not sell Poroshenko or Georgia? Or the Taliban?



                    They don’t have money for weapons, but they, unlike real buyers, don’t ask, but what we ask for - gas, coal - we sell

                    And if it were?
                    1. bulvas
                      bulvas 11 November 2015 12: 58 New
                      -2
                      Quote: atalef
                      And if it were?



                      Imagine yourself
            2. Mahmut
              Mahmut 11 November 2015 12: 07 New
              +7
              Everything is correct. That's right. For 10 billion to sell to the Saudis, for 5 billion to Yemen, for 15 billion to Iran. And let the devils have fun. And they only know how to pump oil.
          2. bornikrub
            bornikrub 11 November 2015 12: 18 New
            0
            And what will be the “honor” in Hebrew?
            1. Uncle VasyaSayapin
              Uncle VasyaSayapin 11 November 2015 18: 28 New
              0
              I don’t know how to translate it, but in my life I think it’s gesheft. Who has the loot, he is in honor.
          3. DMB_95
            DMB_95 11 November 2015 12: 35 New
            +2
            It would be better if we help with weapons to Yemen, which is now fighting with the Saudis. And if possible, then at the "request" of Yemen it is necessary to bomb Saudi Arabia in the same way as bombing ISIS. It is not necessary to think about profit. This is War, damn it. ISIS is supported only by Saudi support. The Saudis have been feeding and arming the Caucasian terrorists for about 20 years. Fuck them fucking without compromise. Otherwise, the Arab world does not win.
          4. Norman_Pitkin
            Norman_Pitkin 11 November 2015 12: 41 New
            +2
            Exactly! Without a “left” sale, it’s not clear to anyone, the state has neither money for new projects for the army, nor for intelligence, so that it would be armed with sophisticated intelligence gadgets, talented cyber specialists and so on ... It wasn’t a big deal in oil, gas and give private hands! For these riches of the country (including these) our grandfathers shed blood on the Second World War, and tossed billions of units! am If only 51%, but 75% would have made a controlling stake, then there would have been more money coming to the state treasury !!! Soon the army will also become private, and reconnaissance .... and there the special services will buy it! negative Communism may indeed be utopia, but capitalism is no less utopia! And the new, wise "... isms" have not yet been invented request
            1. 34 region
              34 region 11 November 2015 13: 16 New
              +1
              Cannibalism. fool
          5. mav1971
            mav1971 11 November 2015 14: 30 New
            +1
            Quote: bulvas


            Will it be better if the capitalists of other countries sell?

            Are we so generous and rich that we are ready to give the contract and profit to the USA, China, Israel?

            They will make a profit in the form of taxes.
            Their specialists will receive an incentive for development
            Their intelligence will gain control on weapons

            Will it be better?


            The most important condition is not written in the article.
            A deal can only take place if ours remove Assad.
            Otherwise, there will be no transaction.
            neither on 10 lard, nor on 1 dollar.
            To the Saudis, our weapons did not fight at all.
            They have everything built on NATO standards. The technique is American and NATO.
            It’s impossible for them to use our weapons in any way in full format.

            so it's just a bribe for Assad’s head.

            And if ours surrenders Assad and concludes a deal, then the Sauddis, if they buy it, will immediately give it to what was Syria or Afghanistan or Africa.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. g1v2
          g1v2 11 November 2015 11: 50 New
          +8
          Not for profit, but for markets. KSA was in 4th place in the procurement of weapons, if my sclerosis does not fail me. This is a large market that feeds Europeans and the United States. To tear off a piece on it is very good. Moreover, a direct war between us is unlikely to be in the foreseeable future. Plus, the Saudis pay for Egypt, with whom we are now friends and to whom we also sell weapons. Plus - Iran, in connection with the strengthening of the Saudis, can also buy weapons from us. The Middle East arms race, if it exists and if we supply arms to both sides, can seriously raise our military industrial complex and reduce the cost of arms production for us, because the larger the party, the lower the cost of an individual product. It would be necessary for the Hussites to throw something through Iran, so that the Saudis order more technology.
          Plus, the Saudis are at enmity with Qatar, and that one has obviously gone too far. Well, it is possible that sooner or later the Saudis will recognize defeat in Syria and either withdraw the remnants of the nusra or stop sponsoring it.
          1. Per se.
            Per se. 11 November 2015 12: 43 New
            +1
            Quote: g1v2
            Not for profit, but for markets.
            Sales markets ... I repeat on the topic, if the United States, with which we love to measure the percentage of sales, make the primary purchases for its army, giving it priority, then we have priority in work on export deliveries. It turns out, already by the residual principle, it’s okay for everything, if they were selling the latest technology, at least for gold, then no, the despicable dollar does not directly work so indirectly on the US economy. Finally, the States do not sell everything, such combat aircraft, such as the F-22 or F-117, are supplied only for the US Army, and this is not the only weapon that is closed for export, there are countries to which the States will not sell weapons, so as it is already a question of the policy and national security of their country. The Saudis are direct allies of the United States. Do our merchants understand this from defense or are they absolutely on the drum, if only they would pay "greens"? A new sample will not have time to appear, they are already looking for a foreign buyer. You fill your army first, then sell the surplus. Now it’s not so, with the bourgeoisie, the enthusiasm of creativity and money is developing, the old-fashioned people of the Soviet Union will leave, and then even cooperation with India or crafty China will not help much, they will sell what the old people created. The same China, already for the clones of Su-27 and C-300, had to show a muzzle, and they already had C-400 and Su-35, it’s not enough, they are creating competition. Profit, money, here and now, but does something miscalculate in the future? Arms deliveries should primarily ensure the security of their country, and how profitable it can be, should be decided after. Drove "buy-sell" to the defense, the legacy of Soviet science and technology, how to sell raw materials, it feels like they would have sold to Hitler during the war, would have been profit.
            1. F.Vastag
              F.Vastag 11 November 2015 13: 05 New
              +1
              Everything is true. Friend, during the Second World War "Isaikins and Rosoboronexport" and Hitler (Fascist Germany) would be delivered weapons (if Grandmothers Payed (Dollar Green) - THERE (after) for Them: GRASS NOT GROW)
            2. g1v2
              g1v2 11 November 2015 14: 35 New
              -3
              The USA buys everything on credit - their debt ceiling is constantly growing. We cannot afford this, and it’s not worth it. F22 and F117, as far as I remember, are discontinued, and few would buy them because they are expensive. But f35 states vtyuhivayut whoever can. WE HAVE TOTAL 3 HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES THAT MAKE PRODUCTS FOR EXPORT CORRECTLY AND SUPPLY CURRENCY - COSMOS, NUCLEAR POWER ENGINEERING AND MIC. So here we need to strengthen our positions and crush our competitors. In addition, everyone knows that export systems are always truncated compared to those that go to mo. As for the su35, so we are going to switch to the t50 in the coming years, aren't we? As for the c400, well, because we are selling it, it seems, like with old missiles, and those distant ones that were specially designed for it are still not even accepted. Of reasons for panic just do not see it. Yes, and for the same iskander. The export version will definitely have missiles with a range of not more than 500 km, and what actually range of our missiles we can only guess because the agreement on short and medium-range missiles has not been canceled yet. request
        4. Tra-ta-ta
          Tra-ta-ta 11 November 2015 11: 56 New
          +2
          For the sake of profit!
          In December - to repay debts ..
          Better than once again in the pocket of the people ..
        5. nik39reg
          nik39reg 11 November 2015 12: 25 New
          +2
          Guys, what a panic? The sale of weapons, all the more so, provides for the delivery of basic equipment and truncated combat parameters. No one will fully sell weapons in those performance characteristics that are supplied to their own army. Especially when selling to the side, I think ours are well aware that they sold, and there are certain levers to neutralize this weapon in the event of a threat of its use against us.
        6. attuda
          attuda 11 November 2015 13: 00 New
          -2
          And our "capitalists" liberalists do not shun anything


          Well, the weapon is OUR ...
          Keep your enemies closer to your friends ...
          Who knows where there is a CHipsik installed in our weapons, which they will simply forget to inform the sheikhs of Arabia ...
          Sell, then they know why they’re doing
          now is not the 90s ...
        7. Uncle Joe
          Uncle Joe 11 November 2015 15: 31 New
          +1
          Quote: Baikonur
          And our "capitalists" liberalists do not shun anything at all, explaining this as good for the state!
          There is no question of honor at all!
          The nuance is that such contracts are not concluded without the approval of the head of state wink
      2. mihasik
        mihasik 11 November 2015 11: 53 New
        0
        Quote: Bombardier
        Better directly ISIS (without intermediaries in the form of CA) - they will pay .. wassat

        Exactly!) Oil!)))
        And then on the Russian "Passengers" begin to crap!
      3. Nick
        Nick 11 November 2015 13: 03 New
        +1
        Quote: Bombardier
        Better directly ISIS (without intermediaries in the form of CA) - they will pay .. wassat

        The SA helps Egypt with weapons, with which we have recently had very close relations.
    2. kil 31
      kil 31 11 November 2015 11: 27 New
      +3
      The publication recalls that "the head of the Ministry of Defense of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, who visited the Army 2015 forum and the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, became interested in the Iskander operational-tactical missile system."
      Interest in what? Do they have it or is it still interesting to buy it?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 11 November 2015 11: 29 New
        14
        The people, but cheer up, immediately hurray URA screaming new contracts and demand to conclude more, almost as a gift. Ask-get hi
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 11 November 2015 11: 33 New
          +3
          The people, but cheer up, immediately hurray URA screaming new contracts and demand to conclude more, almost as a gift. Ask, get hi


          Monster you ALEXANDER why pick in a sore spot .... smile
          Yes, and you still need to check the message, maybe this is again a classic throw-in and bred .... and some funny guys are driving us by the nose.
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 11 November 2015 11: 27 New
      +4
      Quote: fox21h
      Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

      Qatar... hi
      1. Nikoha.2010
        Nikoha.2010 11 November 2015 11: 29 New
        -1
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        Qatar... hi

        Andrey Yuryevich Zdarova! hi drinks
      2. sannych
        sannych 11 November 2015 11: 29 New
        +9
        Yes, even a catheter ... lol Enemies cannot be armed.
        1. Jack-b
          Jack-b 11 November 2015 11: 50 New
          -1
          They will not send Iskanders to Syria. Spend money on the Iskanders - less will be left on financing terrorists. The only place they can use these Iskanders now is in Yemen. Also, of course, bad, but there may be some kind of ext. conditions of a contract. And on the other hand, pulling the Saudis to their side is also worth a lot. And everything goes to this.
          1. DenZ
            DenZ 11 November 2015 12: 17 New
            +2
            They will not send Iskanders to Syria
            Is not a fact. Today they will not send, tomorrow they themselves may attack Syria. These dogs apparently do not care about any international law there. They are gangsters in fact.
            1. Jack-b
              Jack-b 12 November 2015 06: 44 New
              0
              Quote: DenZ
              Is not a fact. Today they will not send, tomorrow they themselves may attack Syria. These dogs apparently do not care about any international law there. They are gangsters in fact.

              Fact. Iskander is not Kalashnikov. You just can’t hand it over to militants. It is necessary to drag trained military personnel. And for this you need a very good foundation, which is not. They will not drag such a decision through the UN Security Council; ours will veto it. Assad will not attack them, so they won’t be able to send them the type “in response” either. And to support the militants, this again will need to be discussed, and first of all, with the Russian Federation, because suddenly the VKS inadvertently banged this expensive toy at the border crossing. They are dogs or bandits, it’s sideways. They are not q iots. This is also a fact. And to drag the Iskanders bought in the Russian Federation to Syria, where our VKS work without our approval, is pure idiocy. States bomb Syria only for the simple reason that they do not touch Assad. To bomb the Syrian army they have a thin gut. Sly weapons to the militants toss it yes, and they themselves are at war with Assad. So are the Saudis. Weapons will be thrown to the militants, and it will not be enough to drag their military men with iskander diapers.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. DMB_95
            DMB_95 11 November 2015 12: 47 New
            +2
            As long as they have a sea of ​​cheap oil, they will have enough for Iskander, ISD support, and a direct war with Syria. And our planes will be shot down by our weapons if there are g / nids ready to sell it.
          4. mihasik
            mihasik 11 November 2015 13: 38 New
            +3
            Quote: Jack-B
            On the other hand, pulling the Saudis to their side is also worth a lot. And everything goes to this.

            Gee-gee!)) Do you know the Saudis so well?) Or are you just dreaming?
            1. Jack-b
              Jack-b 12 November 2015 06: 54 New
              0
              Why should I dream? I state the facts. The Saudis have become much more in contact with the Russian Federation. And politically and economically and militarily. Where are the dreams here? Solid reality.
    4. Tor5
      Tor5 11 November 2015 11: 27 New
      +6
      It’s somehow strange, because they are far from friends to us. Or "money doesn't smell"?
      1. GRAY
        GRAY 11 November 2015 11: 38 New
        0
        Quote: Tor5
        It’s somehow strange, because they are far from friends to us. Or "money doesn't smell"?

        I don’t see a particular problem. They have money, if we don’t sell it, others will sell it.
        1. Mera joota
          Mera joota 11 November 2015 12: 01 New
          -1
          Quote: GRAY
          I don’t see a particular problem. They have money, if we don’t sell it, others will sell it.

          It is understandable, principles, political interests and allies go by the wayside when a magic song sounds

          Money, money, rubbish,
          Forgetting peace and laziness
          Make money make money
          And the rest is rubbish!
        2. 34 region
          34 region 11 November 2015 12: 05 New
          0
          It's like, the more they spend money on our weapons, the less they will have. So they will have to raise the price of oil. And we need this increase. So it turns out?
          1. GRAY
            GRAY 11 November 2015 12: 44 New
            +1
            Quote: 34 region
            oil price. And we need this increase. So it turns out?

            Yes, nothing to do with oil prices.
            It’s just that there are two ways to deal, while the Saudis, in any case, get what they want, regardless of whether Russia earns this or not. There is no point in refusing them, our military-industrial complex lives off foreign orders, in addition, a refusal of the “spite for frostbite my ears” type will only lead to a deterioration in relations between our countries, and it will not be possible to prevent the strengthening of the CA from the word "nothing."
        3. goblin xnumx
          goblin xnumx 11 November 2015 12: 28 New
          +2
          with such words, some in Chechnya were selling weapons - probably the same logic was- and do not say that these are different things in different situations
          1. GRAY
            GRAY 11 November 2015 13: 13 New
            +1
            Quote: Leshy74
            with such words, some in Chechnya were selling weapons - probably the same logic was- and do not say that these are different things in different situations

            That’s what I’ll say.
            Tell me at least one state that sold weapons to the Chechens legally. All their weapons were obtained illegally.
            Saudi Arabia has no such restrictions.
        4. mihasik
          mihasik 11 November 2015 13: 41 New
          +1
          Quote: GRAY
          I don’t see a particular problem. They have money, if we don’t sell it, others will sell it.

          They’ll sell it for sure, but the problem is not the Iskanders).
          1. GRAY
            GRAY 11 November 2015 14: 09 New
            +2
            Quote: mihasik
            They’ll sell it for sure, but the problem is not the Iskanders).

            Recently, there was an article, Americans are either Czech or ATACMS Poles.
            According to its characteristics, this system is very close to the Iskander export version.
            The world is big and many different things are made in it.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Buffalo
      Buffalo 11 November 2015 11: 27 New
      +1
      The export option is always worse than what we have.
      1. Alexey Lobanov
        Alexey Lobanov 11 November 2015 12: 34 New
        +1
        Quote: Bison
        The export option is always worse than what we have.

        I completely agree with you, plus to this - also the ability to influence flight missions for missiles, plus - also GLONASS (I just don’t know, is it possible to use GPS and GLONASS on the same electronic base?). The point is that hardly anyone can use these complexes against us or our interests.
      2. DMB_95
        DMB_95 11 November 2015 12: 53 New
        +1
        Yes, the export option is worse - it will not reach Moscow. And our military base in Syria will be erased from the ground .. Weapons to sell to direct enemies - think what you offer.
        1. Buffalo
          Buffalo 11 November 2015 13: 06 New
          0
          What are you saying?!
          - That's the pike, so that the crucian would not doze off!
          1. DMB_95
            DMB_95 11 November 2015 13: 42 New
            +2
            If you consider yourself a crucian, do not arm pikes ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. atalef
              atalef 11 November 2015 14: 03 New
              +1
              Quote: DMB_95
              If you consider yourself a crucian, do not arm pikes ...


              it would be more correct with at to.
    7. Same lech
      Same lech 11 November 2015 11: 29 New
      +6
      Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.


      This is a business ... as they say nothing personal in this vein and the MEDVEDEV government works ... from which I have a steady burp formed after their reforms.
      1. almost demobil
        almost demobil 11 November 2015 11: 45 New
        +4
        We will not sell, immediately mattress covers or other "partners" will pop up. But at least we will get the dough and we will know exactly what types of weapons we will deal with. Again, it is not easy that the Saudis buy from us and not from them, another injection in the ass.
    8. demon1978
      demon1978 11 November 2015 11: 40 New
      +5
      Quote: fox21h
      Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.



      In a previous article, many pointed to the inevitable presence of “bookmarks” in sophisticated foreign-made equipment.
      This case is what is different ??? !!! request
    9. Gorjelin
      Gorjelin 11 November 2015 11: 43 New
      -3
      Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.


      I agree, but in general, what's the difference, they will buy it anyway, even better with us.

      The only thing that technology can get to them. It is hoped that everything will be thought out here.
      1. 34 region
        34 region 11 November 2015 12: 09 New
        0
        So technology is not part geometry! And they themselves seem to be only selling oil. There is no time to develop your technologies.
        1. Gorjelin
          Gorjelin 11 November 2015 14: 31 New
          +1
          And they themselves seem to be only selling oil. There is no time to develop your technologies.

          1. They have wonderful friends who have time for technology.
          2. Details can be measured if desired, see China. and technical solutions to steal.
    10. just exp
      just exp 11 November 2015 11: 46 New
      0
      1 these contracts have been concluded and are being concluded for about 10 years, IMHO they will also be concluded further.
      2 we will not sell (and IMHO there will be no sale), the states will sell, that is, they will have weapons in any case.
      3 if we sell, the bookmarks will be ours, the states will sell, the bookmarks will be state ones.
    11. mihasik
      mihasik 11 November 2015 11: 50 New
      +1
      Quote: fox21h
      Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

      And what is there to understand, money does not smell. How did they manage in Chechnya? Some warriors are at war with the "Basmachi", and the second to these "Basmachi" almost officially sell our weapons, so that we are soaked with our own weapons.
    12. vell.65
      vell.65 11 November 2015 11: 59 New
      0
      And what kind of weapons will be delivered is not specified. no
    13. DOMINO100
      DOMINO100 11 November 2015 12: 00 New
      0
      grandmas don't smell like a friend! Saudis arm against Qatar.
    14. Wellych
      Wellych 11 November 2015 12: 06 New
      +1
      Judging by how this news is actively being pushed everywhere - and watching a reaction quite programmed for it - I put my skimmer on - that this is a low-grade stuffing either of already irrelevant or obviously false information.
      1. just exp
        just exp 11 November 2015 12: 24 New
        +1
        here in this news they somehow don’t mention that what the Saudis are going to buy here they have already “bought” ten times. as soon as they want to bribe Russia they offer the type of purchase, after six months everything subsides.
    15. The comment was deleted.
    16. Sergey Medvedev
      Sergey Medvedev 11 November 2015 12: 09 New
      0
      Quote: fox21h
      Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding


      You are absolutely right in the current state of affairs. Well, if the Saudis change their position on Syrian and other issues? After all, the article says that these proposals are being prepared for the visit of the Saudi king to Moscow. He was clearly going to offer us something in exchange for a contract. After all, we are already acting together on the oil issue - by joint efforts we are strangling the shale revolution in the USA. In general, I will draw conclusions based on the results of the Moscow visit of the Saudi king.
      1. just exp
        just exp 11 November 2015 12: 26 New
        +1
        in exchange for a contract, they will offer us to surrender Syria. they already came with these contracts a bunch of times.
      2. atalef
        atalef 11 November 2015 12: 43 New
        0
        Quote: Sergey Medvedev
        He was clearly going to offer us something, in exchange for a contract

        the money.
        You understand that there is no problem for Saudi to buy weapons from anyone and any number.
        And certainly Russian weapons have enough analogues in the world.
        Well, then think over. who should offer whom to whom in this situation

        Quote: Sergey Medvedev
        After all, we are already acting together on the oil issue - by joint efforts we are strangling the shale revolution in the USA.

        As if from such efforts the world itself would not go
      3. atalef
        atalef 11 November 2015 12: 43 New
        0
        Quote: Sergey Medvedev
        He was clearly going to offer us something, in exchange for a contract

        the money.
        You understand that there is no problem for Saudi to buy weapons from anyone and any number.
        And certainly Russian weapons have enough analogues in the world.
        Well, then think over. who should offer whom to whom in this situation

        Quote: Sergey Medvedev
        After all, we are already acting together on the oil issue - by joint efforts we are strangling the shale revolution in the USA.

        As if from such efforts the world itself would not go
    17. The comment was deleted.
    18. atalef
      atalef 11 November 2015 12: 20 New
      +1
      Quote: fox21h
      Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

      This is just a business.
      Nothing personal . as they say.
      Somehow everything turned upside down recently
      In late February, Saudi King Abdullah made an extremely harsh statement to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for not consulting the Arab countries before vetoing a UN Security Council resolution requiring the resignation of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

      The uncompromising position of Moscow clearly prevents the Persian sheikhs from realizing their own geopolitical interests in the Middle East region. Acting under the guise of complying with high moral and international standards, Riyadh sends weapons and money to the Syrian opposition through Sunni allied tribes in Iraq and Lebanon. Earlier, Saudi Arabia also played an important role in the Libyan conflict, secretly sending militants to the country and supplying arms and ammunition to the rebels under the guise of “humanitarian aid”

      Or do I not understand something?
    19. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 11 November 2015 12: 33 New
      +1
      I hope that we will live to see a time when Russia will be proud of selling exclusively peaceful goods abroad, and not military weapons and property, which theoretically can be used against its own.
    20. His
      His 11 November 2015 12: 56 New
      0
      I agree. We listen to Satanovsky.
    21. Maxom75
      Maxom75 11 November 2015 13: 05 New
      +1
      It is necessary to make program bookmarks so that the rocket returns to the launch site and sends greetings from the "Russians")))
  2. RuslanNN
    RuslanNN 11 November 2015 11: 25 New
    +3
    The Arabs understood who was the boss in the house.
    1. Nikoha.2010
      Nikoha.2010 11 November 2015 11: 30 New
      0
      Yes, one of your comments on the whole VO is correct! (There is a handsome one) Ruslan, Salam brother!
    2. cniza
      cniza 11 November 2015 11: 31 New
      0
      Quote: RuslanNN
      The Arabs understood who was the boss in the house.



      And now let them line up and don’t be afraid to whom we sell weapons, the main thing is the link to our standards and the future market perspective. Well, if suddenly, you have to fight them ... this will not be the biggest problem.
      1. Nikoha.2010
        Nikoha.2010 11 November 2015 11: 38 New
        -1
        Victor, who are you for?
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 11 November 2015 11: 34 New
      +2
      Quote: RuslanNN
      The Arabs understood who was the boss in the house.

      And who?
      1. Hello
        Hello 11 November 2015 11: 36 New
        +9
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And who?

        The Freemasons wassat
        1. Nikoha.2010
          Nikoha.2010 11 November 2015 11: 39 New
          0
          Ilya Shalom, you didn’t play current!
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 11 November 2015 11: 52 New
          +1
          Quote: Hello
          The Freemasons

          And when will you take power in the Gas Sector? You control the whole world, but you can’t curb a lousy patch of land, shame wassat
          Quote: Nikoha.2010
          Sanya Zdarova!

          Quote: Nikoha.2010
          Sanya Zdarova!

          Serega hello hi
          1. Hello
            Hello 11 November 2015 12: 09 New
            +2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And when will you take power in the Gas Sector? You control the whole world, but you can’t curb a lousy patch of land, shame

            The last piece of the free world. fellow
          2. Nikoha.2010
            Nikoha.2010 11 November 2015 16: 23 New
            0
            Quote: Nikoha.2010
            Sanya Zdarova!

            Sasha, good to see you! And now, what kind of greeting are the cons?
        3. just exp
          just exp 11 November 2015 12: 27 New
          0
          no, they just lose.
      2. Nikoha.2010
        Nikoha.2010 11 November 2015 11: 36 New
        -2
        Sanya Zdarova!
        1. The comment was deleted.
      3. atalef
        atalef 11 November 2015 12: 32 New
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: RuslanNN
        The Arabs understood who was the boss in the house.

        And who?

        Money, Alexander, money.
        Hi !!
    5. The comment was deleted.
  3. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 11 November 2015 11: 26 New
    +4
    the Saudis, like rabid ones, buy weapons everywhere where they are not later, and the Yemeni robbers easily destroy everything from them. It looks like a circus.
    1. just exp
      just exp 11 November 2015 11: 47 New
      0
      VSU2 (the text is too short so I write - your advertisement could be here)
  4. Good_Taxist
    Good_Taxist 11 November 2015 11: 26 New
    0
    They’ll have an anchor .... pu, not a weapon for 10 lard - the Basmachi will come to bargain - Syria, Assad ....
    Let's see "who whom" !!!
  5. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 11 November 2015 11: 26 New
    +3
    RF can supply Saudi Arabian weapons for $ 10 billion
    pistols "macro" and only used ...
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 11 November 2015 11: 30 New
      +2
      pistols "macro" and only used ...


      and a cartridge for every prince ... so that they shot themselves.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 11 November 2015 14: 12 New
        0
        Yes, they will soon bite each other over the throne.
    2. kil 31
      kil 31 11 November 2015 11: 38 New
      +1
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      RF can supply Saudi Arabian weapons for $ 10 billion
      pistols "macro" and only used ...

      The Makrov pistol will not be sold, a very secret weapon. Even we don’t talk about him. Do not shoot the hut. hi laughing
  6. JonnyT
    JonnyT 11 November 2015 11: 26 New
    0
    yes, the sales plan must be implemented ....... I hope the weapons will be put in such a way that it does not help the Saudis
  7. Buffalo
    Buffalo 11 November 2015 11: 27 New
    0
    Change of owner, from the USA to the Russian Federation?
  8. Vitaminchik05
    Vitaminchik05 11 November 2015 11: 27 New
    +2
    Trying to give a bribe? Passed even under Medvedev ....
  9. Grigorievich
    Grigorievich 11 November 2015 11: 28 New
    +1
    Money doesn’t smell, but you need to earn money. They won’t buy from us, they will buy from others.
  10. apro
    apro 11 November 2015 11: 28 New
    0
    In my opinion, I know why the Airbus fell in Egypt.
  11. kagorta
    kagorta 11 November 2015 11: 29 New
    -3
    We must act like Degolev-Mitterrand France. Sell ​​almost everything to everyone. If only there were grandmas. If someone cannot be shipped, then they must be allowed to steal, as with boats commissioned by Israel.
  12. Engineer
    Engineer 11 November 2015 11: 31 New
    +2
    Yes, our defense industry may be big money, but I’m afraid that this weapon will then be directed against our friends in the BV.
  13. andrei332809
    andrei332809 11 November 2015 11: 32 New
    +1
    and the Saudis are not afraid that after such zigzags they can begin to democratize?
  14. msm
    msm 11 November 2015 11: 34 New
    0
    Keyword "can"That dad can. And here, and."can not" may be...
  15. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 11 November 2015 11: 39 New
    +2
    Well, of course, 10 billion. Sauds at least bought something from us ?! As we are going to supply S-300 to Iran, immediately the Saudis show interest in our military-industrial complex. They’ve already thrown it - there’s nothing to talk about with such customers ...
  16. Aksakal_07
    Aksakal_07 11 November 2015 11: 42 New
    -1
    We can and should sell weapons to everyone (the market is the market). You just need to have “bookmarks” in electronic blocks to turn off the system if the buyer, in violation of the contract, begins to use this weapon for other than the “intended use”.
    1. 0255
      0255 11 November 2015 12: 10 New
      +3
      Quote: Aksakal_07
      We can and should sell weapons to everyone (the market is the market). You just need to have “bookmarks” in electronic blocks to turn off the system if the buyer, in violation of the contract, begins to use this weapon for other than the “intended use”.

      Sale of “Iskanders” to the Saudis - consider selling them to the Americans, American specialists will clearly not refuse to study Russian missiles, along with “bookmarks” in electronics.
      Is Iskander easier to sell immediately to the United States without intermediaries in the person of the Saudis? And also sell the Su-35 without intermediaries in the person of the UAE?
  17. DMB3000
    DMB3000 11 November 2015 11: 42 New
    0
    Quote: Bison
    The export option is always worse than what we have.

    usually the opposite
  18. Irbis77
    Irbis77 11 November 2015 11: 43 New
    +3
    the states are dropping tons of weapons and ammunition, but apparently it will not be so long, now the militants will have to buy from the Russians since they are used to our weapons, but in general what happens ??? everyone knows who sponsors the Basmachi, but apparently our state no longer has sources of replenishment of gold and foreign exchange reserves. well, not Che if the Syrians are crushed with our weapons, well, not so if they throw us to the Caucasus through Georgia, in general, great news. Interestingly those who signed the contract for their loved ones are not afraid ??? or are they not made of meat and bones?
  19. Not served
    Not served 11 November 2015 11: 43 New
    +2
    Since this sheikh is not in his own water, there they now generally have a complete mess with the authorities. Apparently a contract for the prospect that the weapon will fall into safe hands))))
  20. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 11 November 2015 11: 43 New
    +3
    “Considers the Gulf countries as promising partners in the field of military-technical cooperation»

    Yes, cooperation, if you look carefully, something else. We give them weapons for money and possibly for some oral obligations. They are us militants with whom we must fight. We probably don’t know much or don’t want to tell us.
  21. askort154
    askort154 11 November 2015 11: 44 New
    +3
    And what will Iran say to this ?!
  22. Mercury
    Mercury 11 November 2015 11: 57 New
    +1
    It is necessary to gather sadomites in Europe and hold a geyparad in Dubai, or whatever they have in Mecca and shoot everything in eichdi, well, the reaction of the Saudis. And another year the West only wakes up to think how the Saudis plant democracy and the Saudis buy weapons from us to fight the democrats
  23. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 11 November 2015 12: 05 New
    0
    Apparently the Yemeni rooster is already very close to the little head of this diesel fuel king ....
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. a-cola
    a-cola 11 November 2015 12: 07 New
    +2
    I think there’s nothing to throw poop about. Everything is written with a pitchfork on the water. Going - doesn’t mean buying. And if they sign the agreement, which also takes time, in three years they will only deliver the products. I think during this time in Syria everything will end. And if it does not end, then our falcons will gouge it all out of heaven, and our directors will still sell it, well, etc. Well, it’s not MANPADS that they are going to sell, I hope. Saudis, if not with us, will buy from mattresses. And for us now, the export of high-tech goods is extremely important. Why be shy then? Mattresses are not shy ...
  26. vladimirw
    vladimirw 11 November 2015 12: 10 New
    +1
    “The head of the Ministry of Defense of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, who visited the Army 2015 forum and the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, became interested in the Iskander operational-tactical missile system.”
    And then in Damascus, like a fuck ....
  27. AID.S
    AID.S 11 November 2015 12: 17 New
    0
    Conversations will remain conversations, protocols of intent, protocols of intent. Nothing will be sold to the Saudis. And on the Internet, another article will appear - "The Russian Federation can put in the SA ...."
  28. Stepan stepanovich
    Stepan stepanovich 11 November 2015 12: 18 New
    0
    On the photo "What a disgusting erysipelas" (c)
  29. Don
    Don 11 November 2015 12: 18 New
    +1
    Dushonki commercial while ruling Russia !!! And try to justify them with all sorts of fairy tales, which you yourself do not believe in !!!! To the families of passengers killed in Egypt, these excuses tell Herods !! THIS do you call cooperation ??? For such a COOPERATION, even a bullet is a pity for you! Nothing more to say.
  30. engineer74
    engineer74 11 November 2015 12: 20 New
    0
    They didn’t work with American weapons in Yemen, did you decide to try with Russian? Oh well... wink
    Actually, the Saudis link such contracts to political conditions, so let's see what happens to bargain for the country of "Victorious Wahhabism" ...
  31. IAlex
    IAlex 11 November 2015 12: 22 New
    +2
    This is an indicator of following national interests. Instead of putting $ 10 billion worth of armaments at Yemen’s expense so that he would drown Arabia in the blood and the price of oil soared to compensate not only for these $ 10 billion, but also much more, our embezzlers decided that it’s more pleasant to steal $ 10 billion than watch out hell knows whose interests. In principle, the Saudis fellows blew up our plane, additionally arming ISIS, lowering the price of oil and offering idiots to solve the problem of pigs planted by them for 10 billion dollars. I would still wipe about such idiots and wipe my feet ...
  32. Army soldier2
    Army soldier2 11 November 2015 12: 24 New
    +2
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    RF can supply Saudi Arabian weapons for $ 10 billion
    pistols "macro" and only used ...


    Or maybe they can drop freely falling bombs on 10 billions by the Air Force?
  33. Taygerus
    Taygerus 11 November 2015 12: 33 New
    0
    sell weapons of course it is necessary, but no more than some wedges, etc. and not to the detriment of our interests in this region, and also not for dollars, but only for gold
  34. F.Vastag
    F.Vastag 11 November 2015 12: 43 New
    +1
    “The Russian Federation can supply Saudi Arabia with weapons worth $ 10 billion ...” And Saudi Arabia MAY (and will do THIS) transfer this to Ross itself. Weapons to the United States of America (its closest partner and accomplice in the Arab World) - for the Study (by the States) and the Antidote Ross to Weapons from the United States and NATO forces. In general, we have an Analytical department that Recommends (gives instructions) with Which countries You can trade Our Arms (NOT TO THE detriment of the National Security of our RUSSIA), but with Any - In No Case (Under no circumstances). We are trying to sell the SU-35 to the UAE Emirates - which in our own Army is practically nonexistent, now it is S. Arabia. And why not then sell Our ISIS Weapons and its militants - after all, the Saudis (Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and other Arab Sheikhs and Monarchies) are the MAJOR SPONSORS of ISIS (and the Frostbroken Muslim Terrorist Zealots), just like them (and Clans like Bin Laden) Sponsored Mujahideen Fuckers in Afghanistan (in 1979-1989) against our guys. With countries such as S. Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea, Japan, NATO bloc countries (that is, countries that are TOTALLY TOTALLY under the Cap of the States (CIA and Pentagon) - IT IS NOT ALLOWED TO TRADE Arms (Russian Weapons ) - since they (these countries - Lackeys and Lizoblyuda USA) will transfer it to 100% America (for Study) and ALL This will turn back then against US (Russia). Money-Loot completely Cover Eyes-Zenki to our Traders (Isaikin and Oboronexport) from Defense (On the principle of “Money Doesn't Smell”). Then both S-400 and our Topoli strategic missiles, etc. — also deliver to the Saudis to the Arabs. But what, they don’t get any money (oil) from the Hens - They’ll pay (if It’s NOT important with whom to trade weapons: “If only they Paid”)
    1. msm
      msm 11 November 2015 13: 07 New
      +1
      We generally have an Analytical Department that Recommends (gives directions)
      Namerek: kickbacks, loot, foreign real estate and other delights
  35. Vecheslavvl
    Vecheslavvl 11 November 2015 12: 53 New
    0
    Saudis are not friends. Fighters - not really. Tricky and treacherous. And they need weapons luxurious. Gilding, leather, comfort. Here is a weapon and sell. With design from the best fashion designers. And add pretty blondes to the product promotion team.
  36. Gunther
    Gunther 11 November 2015 13: 05 New
    0
    We need to supply them with “modified” missile systems, so that we don’t need to shoot down anyone, they fly on the control center from our satellite)))
    But seriously, I agree with fox21h.
  37. sieras
    sieras 11 November 2015 13: 15 New
    +1
    as they say, 10 billion is a net profit. take the cost and it turns out not 10 but what 2. that is, for 2 billion profits, are they ready to deliver weapons to terrorists? why last? and what kind of Saudi is it?
  38. EFRSTR
    EFRSTR 11 November 2015 13: 19 New
    +1
    They have not yet answered for the USSR. For the dead from the Wahhabis. They won’t buy anything, all this whistle. Distraction and looks like a bribe for 321. They sit under the wing of a striped one and think of themselves as decisive with impunity. Russia did not give Mistral, the United States and Israel will never sell weapons to a potential adversary.
  39. Yakut14
    Yakut14 11 November 2015 14: 09 New
    +1
    Think of it! These Saudis can easily turn our weapons against us, although they will be sold out of the way, except for the S-300. But still!!! I do not approve!
  40. Vadim237
    Vadim237 11 November 2015 14: 22 New
    0
    A good deal will be - unless of course it is true - 680 billion rubles, whatever you say, a good investment in our military industrial complex and not only, but at the expense of all fears that these weapons will go to ISIS, as long as this contract starts to be fulfilled and finished, ISIS will this time will be gone.
  41. mamont5
    mamont5 11 November 2015 14: 24 New
    0
    Quote: fox21h
    Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

    That's right, of course. But ... let's hope that our leadership and IT take into account that by the time it will be necessary to transfer weapons (and this is 2-3 of the year) this donkey (SA) will already die.
  42. mav1971
    mav1971 11 November 2015 14: 55 New
    +1
    Fuss about 100500 million posts about selling or not selling ...
    Only now no one climbed to see the existing equipment of the Sauddites.
    All weapons are fresh.
    All productions of the USA and the countries of NATO.
    Accordingly, all tactics, logistics, and security are based on NATO standards and are built up.
    Will there be a place in a completely different, unfamiliar technique for 10 lards, and is this a big contract?
    Not found. I assure you.
    Except in the case of the creation of Sauddites in the army of relatively new units. not related to the existing army, such as Chinese short and medium range BRs.
    In addition to EW and OTR - they have nothing to take. And NATO’s OTP is developing rapidly. EW - hardly sold to the Sauddites.
    Accordingly, this is a stuffing about 10 lards - a bribe for Assad's departure. and that’s it.
    Is Assad 10 Lard worth? Or not?
    Moreover, it must be understood that 10 is the final amount - scatter it on the costs of materials, the mandatory use of NATO components and components, and you get the amount of income 10 times less. And that is likely less will go to the salaries of real Russian manufacturers.
    You can not argue further. wink
  43. marinier
    marinier 11 November 2015 15: 00 New
    0
    Good time of the day, yep!
    In my opinion, they’re trading in a brazen and tedious way. The question is, with whom ?, the terms of the transaction,
    subject of bargaining, form of payment. In aggregate, if folds passia,
    will start a deal. In this situation, the buyer is more delicate about bi
    not entirely predictable in their behavior. But as the old woman is said to be
    a bail, namely in the most severe form, he will discuss the terms of the transaction, for example: not
    not under any pretext use purchased weapons against the most immediate, indirect
    friends of RUSSIA !!! ", who will discuss in detail who ?! If the purchased goods are suddenly discovered by igil, dzabhat-an-nusra, etc., etc., or a structure related to them, then
    RUSSIAN Federation, will be considered as a hostile step, hostile
    g-tva! When this excuses type excuses overlooked, whistled, kidnapped, not parsed !!! And in view of the warning, a salvo of Caliber will be used, if it doesn’t reach, the extension continues with the help of the Iskander.
    I assure you, mrs, no one for these mongrels will not be on our side (NATO).

    P.S. Suvazhenie to you!
    1. F.Vastag
      F.Vastag 11 November 2015 16: 04 New
      0
      Imagine, We (Russia - RosoboronExport) sell Weapons for $ 10 billion (ISKANDERS) to Saudi Arabia (Saudis) - and They Transfer (or Sell) It to You (NATO Countries, for example, Holland (you have the Netherlands flag) and the USA ) You just Tear This Weapon Off the Cogs (thoroughly study It (our Missiles) Weaknesses and Create Your Own Weapons (in Europe and the USA AGAINST Us (Russia) and our Iskanders. In FIG (WHY PEOPLE) IT IS NECESSARY for us to make this deal with Played the National Security Against Our Russia by the Devil (Saudis), but you (in order to earn Babla Money) do not sell the Weapons of NATO Countries (Holland or the USA), for example, to China, Iran and North Korea (because it can be used against you - NATO troops ). Why We (Russia) should Trade with Fully controlled (USA and NATO) countries (lackeys and satellites) such as: Saudi Arabia, Japan, or South Korea. With respect to you (as a resident of the NATO country - our potential enemy)
      1. marinier
        marinier 11 November 2015 19: 24 New
        0
        You just imagine WE (The Corrupting West-NATO, vsia ne4ist)
        By the time we know TTC, these weapons.
        In figs, this is unnecessary to us (cogs, screws, washers, gaskets).
        Uvazaemaia, I ask for a design, I don’t know your
        gender.
        Based on your surface analysis of my stats,
        I conclude: you do not come to the military caste of RUSSIA "
        : You do not have the concept of intelligence "
        : You are also without understanding about the embargo ES on
        higher arrears rates
        us".
        With respect to you as a Citizen of a friendly country,
        and sung to me drowsy lyubimoy
        RUSSIA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  44. guzik007
    guzik007 11 November 2015 16: 07 New
    +1
    Maybe they know better upstairs, but if it turns out that it was they who attached little hands to our plane? How will the Kremlin make excuses for the people? Or does the loot still win?
    1. KnightRider
      KnightRider 11 November 2015 18: 40 New
      0
      Quote: guzik007
      Maybe they know better upstairs, but if it turns out that it was they who attached little hands to our plane? How will the Kremlin make excuses for the people? Or does the loot still win?

      The little hands made the Qatari special services (Satanovsky)
      Regarding the sale of CA weapons and the subsequent resale of the United States, and then the IG ... do you even seriously believe that you write? You moderate your imagination, or else the Iskanders shooting at our air base in Latakia seem to you. It's funny to read, like adults are all men ... fool laughing
  45. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 11 November 2015 20: 26 New
    0
    Quote: mihasik
    The Saudis sponsored the attacks in Russia, and Russia is selling weapons to them in gratitude!

    So after all, there is one rollback in 10% of the amount - 65 billion rubles! You what! Who will refuse such a piece in their pocket?
    ... "at 300% profit - there is no crime that he would not risk, at least under the threat of the gallows."
    K. Marx "Capital"
    Or do you not know our officials?
  46. Urri
    Urri 11 November 2015 20: 43 New
    0
    I see, since the time of “Kursk” the price tag has not changed.
  47. gammipapa
    gammipapa 11 November 2015 21: 11 New
    +1
    But they don’t want to buy Gazprom from us? or it sounds much more blasphemous than selling them advanced weapons.
    And we also have many beautiful women.