RF can supply Saudi Arabian weapons for $ 10 billion

Currently, Russian companies are working on a package of contracts for the supply of Saudi Arabia weapons for $ 10 billion, which should be prepared for the visit of the head of state al-Saud, reports RIA News message newspaper "Vedomosti".

“King of Saudi Arabia Salman ibn Abdel-Aziz al-Saud may visit Moscow in late November and a package of contracts for the supply of up to $ 10 billion to the Russian kingdom is already being prepared for his visit”- said in a statement.

The publication reminds that "the head of the Ministry of Defense of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, who visited the Army-2015 forum and the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, became interested in the Iskander tactical missile system."

Earlier, the head of Rosoboronexport, Anatoly Isaikin, stated that the company "considers the countries of the Persian Gulf as promising partners in the field of military-technical cooperation." According to the director general, these “countries are currently assessing which technology, European, American or Russian, is most needed by their armed forces.”

Comments

[fox21h]

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

[Bombardier]

Better directly ISIS (without intermediaries in the form of CA) - they will pay ..

[Baikonur]

Capitalism is his mother! Che wonder!
"There is no such crime, which would not have gone capital for the sake of profit!"
(Karl Marx, "Capital")
And our "capitalists" liberals generally do not disdain anything, explaining this by the benefits for the state!
There is no question of honor at all!

[bulvas]

Quote: Baikonur

Capitalism is his mother! Che wonder!
"There is no such crime, which would not have gone capital for the sake of profit!"
(Karl Marx, "Capital")
And our "capitalists" do not shun anything at all! There is no question of honor at all!

Will it be better if the capitalists of other countries sell?

Are we so generous and rich that we are ready to give the contract and profit to the USA, China, Israel?

They will make a profit in the form of taxes.
Their specialists will receive an incentive for development
Their intelligence will gain control on weapons

Will it be better?

[mihasik]

Quote: bulvas

Will it be better if the capitalists of other countries sell?
Foreign state will receive profit in the form of taxes
Foreign specialists will receive an incentive for development
Foreign intelligence will gain control on weapons
Will it be better?

They already wrote here. So sell immediately, directly to ISIS and our instructors in addition, so that our planes are shot down! No, but what ?!

[bulvas]

Quote: mihasik

They already wrote here. So sell immediately, directly to ISIS and our instructors in addition, so that our planes are shot down! No, but what ?!

What to sell ISIS? Iskanders?

And then shoot down planes?

Who has not realized that besides Russia there are other arms suppliers in the world

To give them the market - in today's conditions, is tantamount to betrayal and sabotage

[mihasik]

Quote: bulvas

ut already written. So sell immediately, directly to ISIS and our instructors in addition, so that our planes are shot down! No, but what ?!

What to sell ISIS? Iskanders?

And the Iskanders will go, why not? On the air base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria "mock", eh? Themselves write in the performance characteristics-100% defeat of the target, "Iskander" do not go astray. The Russian Federation will sell them to the CA, the CA will sell them to Qatar and the USA, and they will supply them to ISIS and voila!) Hello, the VKS base! Money doesn't smell, does it?
It would have looked cool, for example, in WWII: Stalin would have sold a batch of Katyushas and T-34 tanks to Hitler. Bitch, in general, the people's brains turned over. The Saudis sponsored terrorist attacks in Russia, and Russia sells weapons to them in gratitude!

[bulvas]

Quote: mihasik

And the Iskander will go, why not? Money doesn't smell, does it? It would have looked cool, for example, in WWII: Stalin would have sold a batch of Katyushas and T-34 tanks to Hitler. Bitch, in general, the brains of the people turned over. The Saudis sponsored terrorist attacks in Russia, and Russia sells weapons to them in gratitude!

That some part

people's brains turned upside down

and have not yet taken their place - that's right.

Fortunately, today these issues are solved by people more adequate.

Just in case: there is such a thing - the economy.
It must be profitable.
Without this, there is no army, no weapons, no pensions.

If there is none of this, there is no country

[mihasik]

Fortunately, today these issues are solved by people more adequate.
Just in case: there is such a thing - the economy.
It must be profitable.
Without this, there is no army, no weapons, no pensions.
If there is none of this, there is no country

So I suggest to "adequate" people: sell directly to ISIS. Earn for the economy "babos" and a mountain of corpses to boot! People will appreciate your economic benefits.

[just exp]

but tell me - how many weapons did Russia sell to Saudi Arabia?

[kaluganew]

Do not make up. A strike by iskanders on the base of our flyers means a retaliatory strike, including tactical nuclear weapons. This is direct aggression. The Saudis are not so dumb to live with a lot of money, and then go to the dustbin of history.

ISIS babahs need birds, MANPADS and other toys, not complex systems. They are already getting them from sponsors.

If a contract is being worked out with the Saudis, then there are decisions on nonproliferation. Here many write about the greed and stupidity of our traders, forgetting that economic ties and interests are the best "glue" between states.

Here, another danger flashes, the transfer of US technology. But I sincerely doubt that they do not know the performance characteristics of our products that will be sold to the Arabs. So not a bad deal)

[mihasik]

Quote: kaluganew

Do not make up. A strike by iskanders on the base of our flyers means a retaliatory strike, including tactical nuclear weapons. This is direct aggression. The Saudis are not so dumb to live with a lot of money, and then go to the dustbin of history.

Yah?
And direct sponsoring of the SA terrorist attacks in the Russian Federation was not considered direct aggression? How did the RF CA answer? What kind of retaliation? It is only in the movies that the terrorist bases in Qatar are being spread by our "Swans").
And if the CA sells them to the United States (by the way, who can stop them), and ISIS supplies them, how did the Polish and Czech tanks supply the United States to banderlog in Ukraine? For whom will the RF "answer"? And will he answer at all? Medvedev has already stated here that the Third World War is impossible in the XNUMXst century. Those. "otvetki" will not be if our "wet" will begin? And you're talking about some kind of "retaliatory" strikes, especially tactical nuclear weapons.

[kaluganew]

Right We are so clogged. They didn’t give Georgia the teeth, and is Crimea now flying the flag of Ukraine too? And the North wind did not blow in the east of Ukraine.

It’s not always possible to play with a saber, sometimes you need to play the fool.

A fart in the form of Czech tanks helped the Ukrainians a lot?

Could this be the reason why there is not enough MANPADS in the Baboons yet?

And the fact that the SA sponsored the war in Chechnya and owes us a favor - I agree 100%. But we also fought with the Germans at one time ....

[Vadim237]

Do not write nonsense, nor whoever heavy armored vehicles, much less the PTRC ISIS will not deliver, maximum ATGM and MANPADS.

[Altona]

Quote: mihasik

And the Iskanders will go, why not? On the air base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria "mock", eh? Themselves write in the performance characteristics-100% defeat of the target, "Iskander" do not go astray. The Russian Federation will sell them to the CA, the CA will sell them to Qatar and the USA, and they will supply them to ISIS and voila!) Hello, the VKS base! Money doesn't smell, does it?

------------------------
You are describing some absolutely transcendent case. Offensive weapons of this kind are unlikely to be sold, secondly, there is a list of weapons whose supplies are limited, and thirdly, the Saudis are probably interested in some aircraft and armored vehicles. And the warriors of them are awful. As for ISIS, its army is a workers 'and peasants', complex equipment is not able to service ... The captured Abrams cannot be mastered, what can we say further ...

[nazar_0753]

I would like to immediately write for people noted by a special mind.
Firstly, with regard to the strike at the air base - from a practical point of view it is impossible. Our designers and manufacturers, as I dare to consider, are by no means fools to rivet export complexes without a certain kind of bookmarks. If the Saudis get it wrong to randomly shoot at the Khmeimim base, for a start the missile simply will not work for its intended purpose (if there are systems that can transmit a signal at a sufficient range, and judging by the air defense cover, there will be no problems with such systems). And then these oil barrels can be grabbed by the horns for a direct attack on the Russian Federation.
Secondly, the option of transferring IG complexes is absurd, it is approximately similar to the situation “scratch behind the left ear with the right foot”.
A) thugs will not be able to master such a complex complex, this is not AK-74, not Katyusha, and not even T-55;
B) even assuming that terrorists can use the Iskander (and we remember that it will not reach the target), it will not be difficult to determine which country gave the complex to terrorists and trained them in management if you are over 10 years old and you Do not suffer from Down syndrome. And this is a direct aiding of the groups officially recognized by the UN as terrorist.
Thirdly, the characteristics of the export option are greatly reduced, often several times, therefore, the threat of Russia from this complex tends to zero.
Fourth, the flow of money into the economy has always been extremely important. Moreover, the money received (for the most part, I hope) will probably go to the same defense orders. Using a comparison that is close to you, we sell 50 pieces of BT-2 to produce 25 pieces of T-34 for ourselves. I don’t think that now the authorities would often and for a long time want to get into the people’s pockets, swaying discontent. And how else to get us full-fledged OTRK?
In general, I believe that the sale of Iskander-E, provided that the majority of the proceeds go to orders for the defense industry or other government purposes, is only a plus.
Best regards

[atalef]

Quote: bulvas

It has not even come to anyone's knowledge that besides Russia, there are other arms suppliers in the world. To give them the market is in today's conditions tantamount to betrayal and sabotage.

so why not sell Poroshenko or Georgia? Or the Taliban?

[kaluganew]

with the listed persons we fought with no Saudi

[bulvas]

Quote: atalef

so why not sell Poroshenko or Georgia? Or the Taliban?

They don’t have money for weapons, but they, unlike real buyers, don’t ask, but what we ask for - gas, coal - we sell

[atalef]

Quote: bulvas

Quote: atalef

so why not sell Poroshenko or Georgia? Or the Taliban?

They don’t have money for weapons, but they, unlike real buyers, don’t ask, but what we ask for - gas, coal - we sell

And if it were?

[atalef]

Quote: bulvas

Quote: atalef

so why not sell Poroshenko or Georgia? Or the Taliban?

They don’t have money for weapons, but they, unlike real buyers, don’t ask, but what we ask for - gas, coal - we sell

And if it were?

[bulvas]

Quote: atalef

And if it were?

Imagine yourself

[Mahmut]

Everything is correct. That's right. For 10 billion to sell to the Saudis, for 5 billion to Yemen, for 15 billion to Iran. And let the devils have fun. And they only know how to pump oil.

[bornikrub]

What is “honor” in Hebrew?

[Uncle VasyaSayapin]

I don’t know how in translation, but in my life I think it’s "gesheft". Whoever has the loot is honored.

[DMB_95]

It will be better if we help Yemen with weapons, which is now fighting the Saudis. And if there is a possibility, then at the "request" of Yemen it is necessary to bomb Saudi Arabia in the same way as we bomb ISIS. It is not necessary to think about profit here. This is War, damn it. ISIS only holds on to Saudi support. The Saudis have been feeding and arming Caucasian terrorists for 20 years. Get the fuck out of them without compromise. There is no other way to win in the Arab world.

[Norman_Pitkin]

Exactly! Without selling "to the left" it is not clear to whom, the state has no money either for new projects for the army, nor for exploration, so that it is armed with sophisticated intelligence gadgets, or talented cyber specialists, and so on ... private hands to give away! For these riches of the country (including these), our grandfathers shed their blood in the Second World War, and turn over billions of units! If only 51%, but 75% would have made a controlling stake, then there would have been more money coming to the state treasury !!! Soon the army will also become private, and reconnaissance .... and there the special services will buy it! Communism may indeed be a utopia, but capitalism is no less a utopia! And new, wise "... isms" have not yet been invented

[34 region]

Cannibalism.

[mav1971]

Quote: bulvas

Will it be better if the capitalists of other countries sell?

Are we so generous and rich that we are ready to give the contract and profit to the USA, China, Israel?

They will make a profit in the form of taxes.
Their specialists will receive an incentive for development
Their intelligence will gain control on weapons

Will it be better?

The most important condition is not written in the article.
A deal can only take place if ours remove Assad.
Otherwise, there will be no transaction.
neither on 10 lard, nor on 1 dollar.
To the Saudis, our weapons did not fight at all.
They have everything built on NATO standards. The technique is American and NATO.
It’s impossible for them to use our weapons in any way in full format.

so it's just a bribe for Assad’s head.

And if ours surrenders Assad and concludes a deal, then the Sauddis, if they buy it, will immediately give it to what was Syria or Afghanistan or Africa.

[g1v2]

Not for profit, but for markets. KSA was in 4th place in the procurement of weapons, if my sclerosis does not fail me. This is a large market that feeds Europeans and the United States. To tear off a piece on it is very good. Moreover, a direct war between us is unlikely to be in the foreseeable future. Plus, the Saudis pay for Egypt, with whom we are now friends and to whom we also sell weapons. Plus - Iran, in connection with the strengthening of the Saudis, can also buy weapons from us. The Middle East arms race, if it exists and if we supply arms to both sides, can seriously raise our military industrial complex and reduce the cost of arms production for us, because the larger the party, the lower the cost of an individual product. It would be necessary for the Hussites to throw something through Iran, so that the Saudis order more technology.
Plus, the Saudis are at enmity with Qatar, and that one has obviously gone too far. Well, it is possible that sooner or later the Saudis will recognize defeat in Syria and either withdraw the remnants of the nusra or stop sponsoring it.

[Per se.]

Quote: g1v2

Not for profit, but for markets.

Sales markets ... I repeat on the topic, if the same USA, with which we are so fond of measuring the percentage of sales, make primary purchases for their army, giving it priority, then we have priority to work on export deliveries. It turns out that, according to the leftover principle, everything is fine, if only they were selling the latest technology, so even for gold, no, the despicable dollar continues to work not directly so indirectly for the US economy. Finally, the States do not sell everything, such combat aircraft as, for example, the F-22 or F-117 are supplied only for the US Army, and these are not the only weapons closed for export, there are also countries to which the States will not sell weapons, so as it is already a matter of politics and national security of their country. The Saudis are direct allies of the United States. Do our traders understand this from defense, or are they absolutely on the drum, if only the "green" was paid? Before a new sample appears, a foreign buyer is already looking for it with us. You saturate your army first, then sell the surplus. Now, not very much, with bourgeois, the enthusiasm for creativity and for money is developing, the old people of the Soviet school will leave, and then even cooperation with India or crafty China will not help much, they will sell what the old people created. The same China already had to show the gun for the clones of the Su-27 and S-300, but they already had the S-400 and the Su-35, it was evident that they were creating competition. Profit, money, here and now, but for the future is anything calculated? Arms deliveries must first of all ensure the security of their country, and how profitable it can be, must be decided after. The "buy-sell" broke into the defense, the legacy of Soviet science and technology, how raw materials are sold, it feels like they would have sold Hitler during the war, there would have been a profit.

[F.Vastag]

That's right Friend, during the Second World War, "Isaykiny and Rosoboronexport" and Hitler (Nazi Germany) -weapons would be supplied (if only Grandma Paid (Green dollars) - AND THERE (after) for Them: GRASS DO NOT GROW)

[g1v2]

The USA buys everything on credit - their debt ceiling is constantly growing. We cannot afford this, and it’s not worth it. F22 and F117, as far as I remember, are discontinued, and few would buy them because they are expensive. But f35 states vtyuhivayut whoever can. WE HAVE TOTAL 3 HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES THAT MAKE PRODUCTS FOR EXPORT CORRECTLY AND SUPPLY CURRENCY - COSMOS, NUCLEAR POWER ENGINEERING AND MIC. So here we need to strengthen our positions and crush our competitors. In addition, everyone knows that export systems are always truncated compared to those that go to mo. As for the su35, so we are going to switch to the t50 in the coming years, aren't we? As for the c400, well, because we are selling it, it seems, like with old missiles, and those distant ones that were specially designed for it are still not even accepted. Of reasons for panic just do not see it. Yes, and for the same iskander. The export version will definitely have missiles with a range of not more than 500 km, and what actually range of our missiles we can only guess because the agreement on short and medium-range missiles has not been canceled yet.

[Tra-ta-ta]

For the sake of profit!
In December - to repay debts ..
Better than once again in the pocket of the people ..

[nik39reg]

Guys, what a panic? The sale of weapons, all the more so, provides for the delivery of basic equipment and truncated combat parameters. No one will fully sell weapons in those performance characteristics that are supplied to their own army. Especially when selling to the side, I think ours are well aware that they sold, and there are certain levers to neutralize this weapon in the event of a threat of its use against us.

[attuda]

And our "capitalists" liberals do not shun anything at all

Well, the weapon is OUR ...
Keep your enemies closer to your friends ...
Who knows where there is a CHipsik installed in our weapons, which they will simply forget to inform the sheikhs of Arabia ...
Sell, then they know why they’re doing
now is not the 90s ...

[Uncle Joe]

Quote: Baikonur

And our "capitalists" liberals generally do not disdain anything, explaining this by the benefits for the state!
There is no question of honor at all!

The nuance is that such contracts are not concluded without the approval of the head of state

[mihasik]

Quote: Bombardier

Better directly ISIS (without intermediaries in the form of CA) - they will pay ..

Exactly!) Oil!)))
And then on Russian "Passengers" will start to shit!

[Nick]

Quote: Bombardier

Better directly ISIS (without intermediaries in the form of CA) - they will pay ..

The SA helps Egypt with weapons, with which we have recently had very close relations.

[kil 31]

The publication reminds that "the head of the Ministry of Defense of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, who visited the Army-2015 forum and the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, became interested in the Iskander tactical missile system."

Interest in what? Do they have it or is it still interesting to buy it?

[Alexander Romanov]

The people, but cheer up, immediately hurray URA screaming new contracts and demand to conclude more, almost as a gift. Ask-get

[Same lech]

The people, but cheer up, immediately hurray URA screaming new contracts and demand to conclude more, almost as a gift. Ask, get hi

Monster you ALEXANDER why pick in a sore spot ....
Yes, and you still need to check the message, maybe this is again a classic throw-in and bred .... and some funny guys are driving us by the nose.

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: fox21h

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

Qatar...

[Nikoha.2010]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

Qatar...

Andrey Yuryevich Zdarova!

[sannych]

Yes, even a catheter ... Enemies cannot be armed.

[Jack-b]

They will not send Iskanders to Syria. Spend money on the Iskanders - less will be left on financing terrorists. The only place they can use these Iskanders now is in Yemen. Also, of course, bad, but there may be some kind of ext. conditions of a contract. And on the other hand, pulling the Saudis to their side is also worth a lot. And everything goes to this.

[DenZ]

They will not send Iskanders to Syria

Is not a fact. Today they will not send, tomorrow they themselves may attack Syria. These dogs apparently do not care about any international law there. They are gangsters in fact.

[Jack-b]

Quote: DenZ

Is not a fact. Today they will not send, tomorrow they themselves may attack Syria. These dogs apparently do not care about any international law there. They are gangsters in fact.

Fact. Iskander is not a Kalashnikov. You can't just give it to the militants. It is necessary to drag professional trained military personnel. And for this you need a very good reason, which does not exist. They will not push through such a decision through the UN Security Council, ours will veto there. Assad will not attack them, so they cannot send in response. And to support the militants, this will again have to be discussed, and first of all with the Russian Federation, because suddenly the Aerospace Forces inadvertently crashed this expensive toy at the border crossing. They are dogs or bandits, this is a side. They are not even dots. This is also a fact. And to drag Iskander purchased in the Russian Federation to Syria, where our VKS work without our approval, is sheer idiocy. The United States is bombing Syria only for the simple reason that it does not touch Assad. They have no guts to bomb the Syrian army. Slyly to plant weapons for the militants, yes, but they themselves are writing to fight with Assad. So are the Saudis. Weapons will be planted on the militants, and it will not be enough to drag their soldiers with Iskander diapers there.

[DMB_95]

As long as they have a sea of ​​cheap oil, they will have enough for Iskander, ISD support, and a direct war with Syria. And our planes will be shot down by our weapons if there are g / nids ready to sell it.

[mihasik]

Quote: Jack-B

On the other hand, pulling the Saudis to their side is also worth a lot. And everything goes to this.

Gee-gee!)) Do you know the Saudis so well?) Or are you just dreaming?

[Jack-b]

Why should I dream? I state the facts. The Saudis have become much more in contact with the Russian Federation. And politically and economically and militarily. Where are the dreams here? Solid reality.

[Tor5]

How strange, because they are far from our friends. Or "money doesn't smell"?

[GRAY]

Quote: Tor5

How strange, because they are far from our friends. Or "money doesn't smell"?

I don’t see a particular problem. They have money, if we don’t sell it, others will sell it.

[Mera joota]

Quote: GRAY

I don’t see a particular problem. They have money, if we don’t sell it, others will sell it.

It is understandable, principles, political interests and allies go by the wayside when a magic song sounds

Money, money, rubbish,
Forgetting peace and laziness
Make money make money
And the rest is rubbish!

[34 region]

It's like, the more they spend money on our weapons, the less they will have. So they will have to raise the price of oil. And we need this increase. So it turns out?

[GRAY]

Quote: Region 34

oil price. And we need this increase. So it turns out?

Yes, nothing to do with oil prices.
There are simply two situations, while the Saudis get what they want anyway, regardless of whether Russia makes money on it or not. There is no point in refusing them, our military-industrial complex lives off foreign orders, in addition, a refusal of the type "to spite my mother's frostbite ears" will only lead to a deterioration in relations between our countries, and the strengthening of the SA cannot be prevented by the word "in any way".

[goblin xnumx]

with such words, some in Chechnya were selling weapons - probably the same logic was- and do not say that these are different things in different situations

[GRAY]

Quote: Leshy74

with such words, some in Chechnya were selling weapons - probably the same logic was- and do not say that these are different things in different situations

That’s what I’ll say.
Tell me at least one state that sold weapons to the Chechens legally. All their weapons were obtained illegally.
Saudi Arabia has no such restrictions.

[mihasik]

Quote: GRAY

I don’t see a particular problem. They have money, if we don’t sell it, others will sell it.

They will definitely sell, but here's a problem, not Iskander).

[GRAY]

Quote: mihasik

They will definitely sell, but here's a problem, not Iskander).

Recently, there was an article, Americans are either Czech or ATACMS Poles.
In terms of characteristics, this system is very close to the export version of the Iskander.
The world is big and many different things are made in it.

[Buffalo]

The export option is always worse than what we have.

[Alexey Lobanov]

Quote: Bison

The export option is always worse than what we have.

I completely agree with you, plus to this - also the ability to influence flight missions for missiles, plus - also GLONASS (I just don’t know, is it possible to use GPS and GLONASS on the same electronic base?). The point is that hardly anyone can use these complexes against us or our interests.

[DMB_95]

Yes, the export option is worse - it will not reach Moscow. And our military base in Syria will be erased from the ground .. Weapons to sell to direct enemies - think what you offer.

[Buffalo]

What are you saying?!
- That's the pike, so that the crucian would not doze off!

[DMB_95]

If you consider yourself a crucian, do not arm pikes ...

[atalef]

Quote: DMB_95

If you consider yourself a crucian, do not arm pikes ...

it would be more correct with at to.

[Same lech]

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

This is a business ... as they say nothing personal in this vein and the MEDVEDEV government works ... from which I have a steady burp formed after their reforms.

[almost demobil]

We will not sell, mattress covers or other "partners" will immediately hurry up. But at least we will get the dough and we will know exactly what types of weapons we will deal with. Again, it is not just that the Saudis are buying from us and not from them, another injection in the ass.

[demon1978]

Quote: fox21h

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

In the previous article, many pointed to the almost INEVITABLE presence of "bugs" in complex foreign-made equipment.
This case is what is different ??? !!!

[Gorjelin]

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

I agree, but in general, what's the difference, they will buy it anyway, even better with us.

The only thing that technology can get to them. It is hoped that everything will be thought out here.

[34 region]

So technology is not part geometry! And they themselves seem to be only selling oil. There is no time to develop your technologies.

[Gorjelin]

And they themselves seem to be only selling oil. There is no time to develop your technologies.

1. They have wonderful friends who have time for technology.
2. Details can be measured if desired, see China. and technical solutions to steal.

[just exp]

1 these contracts have been concluded and are being concluded for about 10 years, IMHO they will also be concluded further.
2 we will not sell (and IMHO there will be no sale), the states will sell, that is, they will have weapons in any case.
3 if we sell, the bookmarks will be ours, the states will sell, the bookmarks will be state ones.

[mihasik]

Quote: fox21h

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

And what is there to understand, money does not smell. How did they manage in Chechnya? Some warriors are at war with the "Basmachs", and the second are almost officially selling our weapons to these "Basmachs" so that ours are "soaked" with these weapons.

[vell.65]

And what kind of weapons will be delivered is not specified.

[DOMINO100]

grandmas don't smell like a friend! Saudis arm against Qatar.

[Wellych]

Judging by how this news is actively being pushed everywhere - and watching a reaction quite programmed for it - I put my skimmer on - that this is a low-grade stuffing either of already irrelevant or obviously false information.

[just exp]

here in this news as it is not mentioned that what the Saudis are going to buy here, they have "bought" ten times. as soon as they want to bribe Russia, they offer such a purchase, after six months everything subsides.

[Sergey Medvedev]

Quote: fox21h

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding

You are absolutely right in the current state of affairs. Well, if the Saudis change their position on Syrian and other issues? After all, the article says that these proposals are being prepared for the visit of the Saudi king to Moscow. He was clearly going to offer us something in exchange for a contract. After all, we are already acting together on the oil issue - by joint efforts we are strangling the shale revolution in the USA. In general, I will draw conclusions based on the results of the Moscow visit of the Saudi king.

[just exp]

in exchange for a contract, they will offer us to surrender Syria. they already came with these contracts a bunch of times.

[atalef]

Quote: Sergei Medvedev

He was clearly going to offer us something, in exchange for a contract

the money.
You understand that there is no problem for Saudi to buy weapons from anyone and any number.
And certainly Russian weapons have enough analogues in the world.
Well, then think over. who should offer whom to whom in this situation

Quote: Sergei Medvedev

After all, we are already acting together on the oil issue - by joint efforts we are strangling the shale revolution in the USA.

As if from such efforts the world itself would not go

[atalef]

Quote: Sergei Medvedev

He was clearly going to offer us something, in exchange for a contract

the money.
You understand that there is no problem for Saudi to buy weapons from anyone and any number.
And certainly Russian weapons have enough analogues in the world.
Well, then think over. who should offer whom to whom in this situation

Quote: Sergei Medvedev

After all, we are already acting together on the oil issue - by joint efforts we are strangling the shale revolution in the USA.

As if from such efforts the world itself would not go

[atalef]

Quote: fox21h

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

This is just a business.
Nothing personal . as they say.
Somehow everything turned upside down recently

In late February, Saudi King Abdullah made an extremely harsh statement to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for not consulting the Arab countries before vetoing a UN Security Council resolution requiring the resignation of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The uncompromising position of Moscow clearly prevents the Persian sheikhs from realizing their own geopolitical interests in the Middle East region. Acting under the guise of complying with high moral and international standards, Riyadh sends weapons and money to the Syrian opposition through Sunni allied tribes in Iraq and Lebanon. Earlier, Saudi Arabia also played an important role in the Libyan conflict, secretly sending militants to the country and supplying arms and ammunition to the rebels under the guise of “humanitarian aid”

Or do I not understand something?

[Max_Bauder]

I hope that we will live to see a time when Russia will be proud of selling exclusively peaceful goods abroad, and not military weapons and property, which theoretically can be used against its own.

[His]

I agree. We listen to Satanovsky.

[Maxom75]

It is necessary to make software bookmarks so that the rocket returns to the launch site and sends greetings from the "Russians")))

[RuslanNN]

The Arabs understood who was the boss in the house.

[Nikoha.2010]

Yes, one of your comments on the whole VO is correct! (There is a handsome one) Ruslan, Salam brother!

[cniza]

Quote: RuslanNN

The Arabs understood who was the boss in the house.

And now let them line up and don’t be afraid to whom we sell weapons, the main thing is the link to our standards and the future market perspective. Well, if suddenly, you have to fight them ... this will not be the biggest problem.

[Nikoha.2010]

Victor, who are you for?

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: RuslanNN

The Arabs understood who was the boss in the house.

And who?

[Hello]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And who?

The Freemasons

[Nikoha.2010]

Ilya Shalom, you didn’t play current!

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Hello

The Freemasons

And when will you take power in the Gas Sector? You control the whole world, but you can’t curb a lousy patch of land, shame

Quote: Nikoha.2010

Sanya Zdarova!

Quote: Nikoha.2010

Sanya Zdarova!

Serega hello

[Hello]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And when will you take power in the Gas Sector? You control the whole world, but you can’t curb a lousy patch of land, shame

The last piece of the free world.

[Nikoha.2010]

Quote: Nikoha.2010

Sanya Zdarova!

Sasha, good to see you! And now, what kind of greeting are the cons?

[just exp]

no, they just lose.

[Nikoha.2010]

Sanya Zdarova!

[atalef]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Quote: RuslanNN

The Arabs understood who was the boss in the house.

And who?

Money, Alexander, money.
Hi !!

[dchegrinec]

the Saudis, like rabid ones, buy weapons everywhere where they are not later, and the Yemeni robbers easily destroy everything from them. It looks like a circus.

[just exp]

VSU2 (the text is too short so I write - your advertisement could be here)

[Good_Taxist]

They’ll have an anchor .... pu, not a weapon for 10 lard - the Basmachi will come to bargain - Syria, Assad ....
Let's see "who will win" !!!

[Andrey Yuryevich]

RF can supply Saudi Arabian weapons for $ 10 billion

pistols "makrova" and only used ...

[Same lech]

pistols "makrova" and only used ...

and a cartridge for every prince ... so that they shot themselves.

[Vadim237]

Yes, they will soon bite each other over the throne.

[kil 31]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

RF can supply Saudi Arabian weapons for $ 10 billion

pistols "makrova" and only used ...

The Makrova pistol will not be sold, a very secret weapon. They don't even talk about him here. Do not fire the hut.

[JonnyT]

yes, the sales plan must be implemented ....... I hope the weapons will be put in such a way that it does not help the Saudis

[Buffalo]

Change of owner, from the USA to the Russian Federation?

[Vitaminchik05]

Trying to give a bribe? Passed even under Medvedev ....

[Grigorievich]

Money doesn’t smell, but you need to earn money. They won’t buy from us, they will buy from others.

[apro]

In my opinion, I know why the Airbus fell in Egypt.

[kagorta]

We must act like Degolev-Mitterrand France. Sell ​​almost everything to everyone. If only there were grandmas. If someone cannot be shipped, then they must be allowed to steal, as with boats commissioned by Israel.

[Engineer]

Yes, our defense industry may be big money, but I’m afraid that this weapon will then be directed against our friends in the BV.

[andrei332809]

and the Saudis are not afraid that after such zigzags they can begin to democratize?

[msm]

Keyword "can"Dad can. And here, and"can not" may be...

[Stirbjorn]

Well, of course, 10 billion. Sauds at least bought something from us ?! As we are going to supply S-300 to Iran, immediately the Saudis show interest in our military-industrial complex. They’ve already thrown it - there’s nothing to talk about with such customers ...

[Aksakal_07]

It is possible and necessary to sell weapons to everyone (the market is the market). You just need to have "bookmarks" in the electronic blocks to turn off the system in case the buyer, in violation of the contract, starts to use this weapon for other purposes.

[0255]

Quote: Aksakal_07

It is possible and necessary to sell weapons to everyone (the market is the market). You just need to have "bookmarks" in the electronic blocks to turn off the system in case the buyer, in violation of the contract, starts to use this weapon for other purposes.

Sale of Iskander missiles to the Saudis - consider the sale of them to the Americans, American specialists will obviously not refuse to study Russian missiles, along with the "tabs" in electronics.
Is it easier to sell Iskanders directly to the United States without intermediaries in the form of the Saudis? And also sell the Su-35 without intermediaries in the person of the UAE?

[DMB3000]

Quote: Bison

The export option is always worse than what we have.

usually the opposite

[Irbis77]

the states are dropping tons of weapons and ammunition, but apparently it will not be so long, now the militants will have to buy from the Russians since they are used to our weapons, but in general what happens ??? everyone knows who sponsors the Basmachi, but apparently our state no longer has sources of replenishment of gold and foreign exchange reserves. well, not Che if the Syrians are crushed with our weapons, well, not so if they throw us to the Caucasus through Georgia, in general, great news. Interestingly those who signed the contract for their loved ones are not afraid ??? or are they not made of meat and bones?

[Not served]

Since this sheikh is not in his own water, there they now generally have a complete mess with the authorities. Apparently a contract for the prospect that the weapon will fall into safe hands))))

[rotmistr60]

“Considers the Gulf countries as promising partners in the field of military-technical cooperation»

Yes, cooperation, if you look carefully, something else. We give them weapons for money and possibly for some oral obligations. They are us militants with whom we must fight. We probably don’t know much or don’t want to tell us.

[askort154]

And what will Iran say to this ?!

[Mercury]

It is necessary to gather sadomites in Europe and hold a geyparad in Dubai, or whatever they have in Mecca and shoot everything in eichdi, well, the reaction of the Saudis. And another year the West only wakes up to think how the Saudis plant democracy and the Saudis buy weapons from us to fight the democrats

[Mama_Cholli]

Apparently the Yemeni rooster is already very close to the little head of this diesel fuel king ....

[a-cola]

I think there’s nothing to throw poop about. Everything is written with a pitchfork on the water. Going - doesn’t mean buying. And if they sign the agreement, which also takes time, in three years they will only deliver the products. I think during this time in Syria everything will end. And if it does not end, then our falcons will gouge it all out of heaven, and our directors will still sell it, well, etc. Well, it’s not MANPADS that they are going to sell, I hope. Saudis, if not with us, will buy from mattresses. And for us now, the export of high-tech goods is extremely important. Why be shy then? Mattresses are not shy ...

[vladimirw]

"The head of the Ministry of Defense of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, who attended the Army-2015 forum and the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, became interested in the Iskander operational-tactical missile system."
And then in Damascus, like a fuck ....

[AID.S]

Conversations will remain conversations, protocols of intent - protocols of intent. Nothing will be sold to the Saudis. And another article will appear on the Internet - "The Russian Federation can deliver to the CA ...."

[Stepan stepanovich]

In the photo "What a disgusting mug" (c)

[Don]

Dushonki commercial while ruling Russia !!! And try to justify them with all sorts of fairy tales, which you yourself do not believe in !!!! To the families of passengers killed in Egypt, these excuses tell Herods !! THIS do you call cooperation ??? For such a COOPERATION, even a bullet is a pity for you! Nothing more to say.

[engineer74]

They didn’t work with American weapons in Yemen, did you decide to try with Russian? Oh well...
Actually, the Saudis link such contracts with political conditions, so let's see what the country of "Victory Wahhabism" can do ...

[IAlex]

This is an indicator of following national interests. Instead of putting $ 10 billion worth of armaments at Yemen’s expense so that he would drown Arabia in the blood and the price of oil soared to compensate not only for these $ 10 billion, but also much more, our embezzlers decided that it’s more pleasant to steal $ 10 billion than watch out hell knows whose interests. In principle, the Saudis fellows blew up our plane, additionally arming ISIS, lowering the price of oil and offering idiots to solve the problem of pigs planted by them for 10 billion dollars. I would still wipe about such idiots and wipe my feet ...

[Army soldier2]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

RF can supply Saudi Arabian weapons for $ 10 billion

pistols "makrova" and only used ...

Or maybe they can drop freely falling bombs on 10 billions by the Air Force?

[Taygerus]

sell weapons of course it is necessary, but no more than some wedges, etc. and not to the detriment of our interests in this region, and also not for dollars, but only for gold

[F.Vastag]

"The Russian Federation can supply Saudi. Arabia with weapons worth $ 10 billion ..." And Saudi Arabia CAN (and will do THIS) transfer this to Ross. Weapons to the United States of America (its closest partner and accomplice in the Arab World) - for Study (by the States) and the Antidote to Ross Weapons by the United States and NATO forces. In general, we have an Analytical Department that Recommends (gives instructions) with which countries it is possible to trade in our weapons (not to the detriment of the national security of our RUSSIA), but with any - in no case (under any circumstances). We are trying to sell the SU-35 to the United Arab Emirates - which is practically nonexistent in our own Army, and now it is S. Arabia. Why not then sell Our Weapons to ISIS and its militants - after all, the Saudis (Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and other Arab Sheikhs and Monarchies) are the MAIN SPONSORS OF ISIS (and the Frostbitten Muslim Fanatics-Terrorists), just like they (and Clans like Bin Laden) Sponsored the Mujahideen Thugs in Afghanistan (in 1979-1989) against our guys. With Countries such as S. Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea, Japan, NATO countries (that is, countries that are COMPLETELY under the Cap of the States (CIA and Pentagon) - IT IS NOT ALLOWED TO TRADE Arms (Russian Arms) ) - since they (these countries are the Holly and Lizoblyuds of the USA) will transfer it 100% to America (for Study) and ALL This will then turn against the US (Russia). Money-Salvage completely blocked the Zenky-Eyes of our Torgos (Isaykin and Oboronexport) from Defense (According to the principle - "Money Does Not Smell"). Then the S-400 and our strategic rockets "Topoli", etc. - also supply the Arabs-Saudis. And what, they have money (oil): It is NOT important with whom to trade weapons: "If only they paid")

[msm]

We generally have an Analytical Department that Recommends (gives directions)

Namerek: kickbacks, loot, foreign real estate and other delights

[Vecheslavvl]

Saudis are not friends. Fighters - not really. Tricky and treacherous. And they need weapons luxurious. Gilding, leather, comfort. Here is a weapon and sell. With design from the best fashion designers. And add pretty blondes to the product promotion team.

[Gunther]

We need to supply them with "modified" missile systems, so that they do not need to be shot down, they flew around the control center from our satellite)))
But seriously, I agree with fox21h.

[sieras]

as they say, 10 billion is a net profit. take the cost and it turns out not 10 but what 2. that is, for 2 billion profits, are they ready to deliver weapons to terrorists? why last? and what kind of Saudi is it?

[EFRSTR]

They have not yet answered for the USSR. For those killed by the Wahhabis. They won't buy anything, whistle it all. A distraction and looks like a bribe for 321. They sit under the wing of the striped and from impunity they think they are decisive. The Mistrals were not given to Russia, and the US and Israel will never sell weapons to a potential enemy.

[Yakut14]

Think of it! These Saudis can easily turn our weapons against us, although they will be sold out of the way, except for the S-300. But still!!! I do not approve!

[Vadim237]

A good deal will be - unless of course it is true - 680 billion rubles, whatever you say, a good investment in our military industrial complex and not only, but at the expense of all fears that these weapons will go to ISIS, as long as this contract starts to be fulfilled and finished, ISIS will this time will be gone.

[mamont5]

Quote: fox21h

Damn, you still put Kater, I understand everything, but selling weapons to countries that are also preparing terrorists against us is beyond my understanding.

That's right, of course. But ... let's hope that our leadership and IT take into account that by the time it will be necessary to transfer weapons (and this is 2-3 of the year) this donkey (SA) will already die.

[mav1971]

Fuss about 100500 million posts about selling or not selling ...
Only now no one climbed to see the existing equipment of the Sauddites.
All weapons are fresh.
All productions of the USA and the countries of NATO.
Accordingly, all tactics, logistics, and security are based on NATO standards and are built up.
Will there be a place in a completely different, unfamiliar technique for 10 lards, and is this a big contract?
Not found. I assure you.
Except in the case of the creation of Sauddites in the army of relatively new units. not related to the existing army, such as Chinese short and medium range BRs.
In addition to EW and OTR - they have nothing to take. And NATO’s OTP is developing rapidly. EW - hardly sold to the Sauddites.
Accordingly, this is a stuffing about 10 lards - a bribe for Assad's departure. and that’s it.
Is Assad 10 Lard worth? Or not?
Moreover, it must be understood that 10 is the final amount - scatter it on the costs of materials, the mandatory use of NATO components and components, and you get the amount of income 10 times less. And that is likely less will go to the salaries of real Russian manufacturers.
You can not argue further.

[marinier]

Good time of the day, yep!
In my opinion, they’re trading in a brazen and tedious way. The question is, with whom ?, the terms of the transaction,
subject of bargaining, form of payment. In aggregate, if folds passia,
will start a deal. In this situation, the buyer is more delicate about bi
not entirely predictable in their behavior. But as the old woman is said to be
a bail, namely in the most severe form, he will discuss the terms of the transaction, for example: not
not under any pretext use purchased weapons against the most immediate, indirect
friends of RUSSIA !!! ", who will discuss in detail?! If the purchased weapons are suddenly found at the isis, dzabhat-an-nusra, etc., etc., or a structure related to them, then
RUSSIAN Federation, will be considered as a hostile step, hostile
g-tva! When this excuses type excuses overlooked, whistled, kidnapped, not parsed !!! And in view of the warning, a salvo of Caliber will be used, if it doesn’t reach, the extension continues with the help of the Iskander.
I assure you, mrs, no one for these mongrels will not be on our side (NATO).

P.S. Suvazhenie to you!

[F.Vastag]

Imagine, We (Russia - RosoboronExport) sell Weapons for $ 10 billion (ISKANDERS) to Saudi Arabia (Saudis) - and They Transfer (or Sell) It to You (NATO Countries, for example, Holland (you have the Netherlands flag) and the USA ) You just Tear This Weapon Off the Cogs (thoroughly study It (our Missiles) Weaknesses and Create Your Own Weapons (in Europe and the USA AGAINST Us (Russia) and our Iskanders. In FIG (WHY PEOPLE) IT IS NECESSARY for us to make this deal with Played the National Security Against Our Russia by the Devil (Saudis), but you (in order to earn Babla Money) do not sell the Weapons of NATO Countries (Holland or the USA), for example, to China, Iran and North Korea (because it can be used against you - NATO troops ). Why We (Russia) should Trade with Fully controlled (USA and NATO) countries (lackeys and satellites) such as: Saudi Arabia, Japan, or South Korea. With respect to you (as a resident of the NATO country - our potential enemy)

[marinier]

You just imagine WE (The Corrupting West-NATO, vsia ne4ist)
By the time we know TTC, these weapons.
In figs, this is unnecessary to us (cogs, screws, washers, gaskets).
Uvazaemaia, I ask for a design, I don’t know your
gender.
Based on your surface analysis of my stats,
I conclude: you will not come to the military caste of RUSSIA "
: You have absolutely no understanding of intelligence "
: You are also without understanding about the embargo ES on
higher arrears rates
us".
With respect to you as a Citizen of a friendly country,
and sung to me drowsy lyubimoy
RUSSIA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[guzik007]

Maybe they know better upstairs, but if it turns out that it was they who attached little hands to our plane? How will the Kremlin make excuses for the people? Or does the loot still win?

[Knight Rider]

Quote: guzik007

Maybe they know better upstairs, but if it turns out that it was they who attached little hands to our plane? How will the Kremlin make excuses for the people? Or does the loot still win?

The little hands made the Qatari special services (Satanovsky)
Regarding the sale of weapons to the SA and the subsequent resale of the United States, and then IS ... do you even seriously believe what you are writing? You suppress your imagination, or else "Iskanders firing at our airbase in Latakia" seem to you. It's funny to read, like adults are all men ...

[16112014nk]

Quote: mihasik

The Saudis sponsored the attacks in Russia, and Russia is selling weapons to them in gratitude!

So after all, there is one rollback in 10% of the amount - 65 billion rubles! You what! Who will refuse such a piece in their pocket?
... "with 300% profit, there is no such crime that he would not risk, even if only under penalty of the gallows."
K. Marx "Capital"
Or do you not know our officials?

[Urri]

I see that the price tag has not changed since the time of the Kursk.

[gammipapa]

But they don’t want to buy Gazprom from us? or it sounds much more blasphemous than selling them advanced weapons.
And we also have many beautiful women.