Igor Konashenkov: "The US State Department, talking about the actions of aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria, is based on fakes of Internet live-guns"

53
The Russian Defense Ministry commented on a statement by a spokesman for the American embassy in Moscow, in which he said that about 80% of Russian attacks aviation in Syria, allegedly not targeted at militants (ISIS). The American gave an interview to one of the Russian media. The official representative of the main military department of the country Igor Konashenkov said the following about the statement of the American "diplomat":

We carefully read the interview by the spokesman for the US embassy in Moscow, William Stevens, published on the website of one of the Russian publications, with assessments of the effectiveness of the actions of the Russian air group in Syria.

This publication is certainly a rare journalistic success. Still, not every day you manage to read this. Just childish naivety.
Now, essentially.

For a week now we have been watching the active “pushing” of someone’s “conclusion” through the Reuters agency that allegedly 80% of Russian air strikes were “not aimed at ISIS objects”. So here everything is clear. By the way, they commented on this misinformation to them reasonably, on the day of its appearance.

But regarding his phrase: “Russian aviation beat against opposition positions, including its moderate portion,” there are questions.

Do we consider the militants of ISIL, “Jabhat-en-Nusra” and “Jaish-al-Fath”, cutting their heads to their captives with the same ecstasy, also “opposition”, but a little immoderate? We are waiting for a response from Mr. Stevens.


Igor Konashenkov: "The US State Department, talking about the actions of aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria, is based on fakes of Internet live-guns"


Then Igor Konashenkov describes those from the American embassy "information" with a capacious word:

And it’s not at all clear how an employee of the US embassy in Moscow can make statements on behalf of the US State Department on the basis of some fakes published online gadgets such as the Syrian Human Rights Protection Network. Yes, to assert that they are trustworthy.

We kindly ask Mr. Stevens to spend a little of his precious time, contact the staff of the relevant US departments. They will tell him, maybe, about this organization.

He himself imagines the life time allotted to any "human rights activist" in the territory controlled by ISIS or other equally irresponsible "oppositionists"?

Although it is not surprising. After all, there are pictures of official US officials with ISIL executioners.


For your information:
"Zhivopyrka" (Dictionary Ushakov) - a place where the constant crowd of people, noise, scandals.

Recall that in recent times a lot of fakes have appeared in the Western press that Russian aviation "is bombing the wrong ones, not so and not there", that peaceful Syrians allegedly die from bombs. The Defense Ministry’s comment on Facebook puts a dot over the “i” about such bogus publications and their real sources.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    30 October 2015 13: 44
    they get all the information on the "censor" and in "YouTube", and intelligence too.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +16
      30 October 2015 13: 46
      Nobody canceled the information war. There is only one recipe - to tell the truth. Talk a lot. This is the only way to dispel the fog of lies of the Western media. Lavrov and a company from the Foreign Ministry are well aware of this.
      1. +5
        30 October 2015 13: 48
        He himself imagines the life time allotted to any "human rights activist" in the territory controlled by ISIS or other equally irresponsible "oppositionists"?
        Represents, because of this, he is in Moscow, and not in Aleppo. And as I understand it, this is his work in the diplomatic corps, in order to constantly maintain this degree with the local opposition.
      2. +2
        30 October 2015 13: 48
        The recipe is one - to tell the truth.
        Living creatures, living creatures, living creatures! Who cares!
        The truth is always alone!
        That said Pharaoh!
        He was very smart
        And for this he was called:
        TUTANHAMON.
        (V. Butusov, group "Nautilus-pompilius")
        1. avg
          +5
          30 October 2015 14: 05
          "The US State Department, when discussing the actions of the Russian Aerospace Forces' aviation in Syria, is based on fake Internet snakes."

          Exactly, the Internet bastard and the diplomat-smacker.
      3. +5
        30 October 2015 13: 55
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Nobody canceled the information war.

        Somehow very slippery the author said: "he gave an interview to one of the Russian media."
        I think that this is RBC, the Ear of Matzah, Novaya Gazeta or Vedomosti - some of them, others hesitate to publish this.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      4. 0
        30 October 2015 14: 04
        duck have long tongues and bald with lies !!!
      5. +8
        30 October 2015 14: 05
        Special thanks to Comrade Konashenkov for the "ZIVOPYRKA". Yes
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. +17
        30 October 2015 14: 17
        I wish I could help Lavrov.
      8. The comment was deleted.
      9. 0
        31 October 2015 01: 41
        Well, Konashenkov vaasche krosssaffcheg! I firmly put him on the level of Lavrov — such a concrete and informed one, the general has not been in his place for a long time — both in the language of agility and in the matter of debate! Bravo, Igor! And the Syrian operation is just brilliantly carried out
        1. 0
          31 October 2015 06: 23
          he lit up in Syria, giving comments at our base.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +24
      30 October 2015 13: 48
      Personally, I imagine all of these Internet experts-gimp somehow
      1. 0
        30 October 2015 17: 38
        ........ uh ....... but how does it talk ????
    5. +6
      30 October 2015 13: 48
      Review of the situation in Syria on October 30, 2015
    6. +2
      30 October 2015 13: 49
      But does it make sense to justify oneself and answer tricks? After all, all but fanatics and idiots, and so it is clear where the fakes and where not. And those who want to believe in all nonsense - will believe in him ...
      1. +3
        30 October 2015 13: 57
        In my opinion it has. If the country's ambassador disseminates information, then this is the position of his country. Official. Even if it is not laughing On any sneeze of any ambassador there should be our powerful bunch. There is no other way. The same goes for the largest news agencies ("independent"). It is imperative to answer in this manner - ironic.
        1. +3
          30 October 2015 14: 43
          Quote: anderles66
          If the country's ambassador disseminates information, then this is the position of his country.

          And if the official representative of the embassy cannot confirm the accuracy of the information provided, then it must be kicked out of the host country for activities incompatible with diplomatic at 24 hours.
      2. +1
        30 October 2015 14: 03
        Of course, you need to answer, those who are smarter (if there are any) in Europe and the USA will understand what’s what, and those who don’t understand for them this is actually being done. The information war, look at European cartoons on Putin, so they imagine us.
    7. +5
      30 October 2015 13: 51
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      And with intelligence too.

      But well done Konashenkov!
      Is Flamebear a U.S. intelligence or State Department?
    8. +4
      30 October 2015 13: 56
      This clown - William Stevens, in addition to being the press secretary of the US Embassy in Russia, also maintains a blog on "Echo of Moscow" and apparently is the curator of all liberal national treacherous media! He always hangs out with the poor, and feeds them with grants. Therefore, he tries in every possible way to harness himself into this dregs, so to speak by personal example: "Lie, do as I do!" laughing
    9. +2
      30 October 2015 14: 46
      No wonder the CIA turned from a normal intelligence service into a bunch of bloggers, with an almost complete absence of agents, because it's easier!
    10. 0
      30 October 2015 17: 37
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      they get all the information on the "censor" and in "YouTube", and intelligence too.

      He got ahead of it and took it off the tongue, this is exactly what was born in my head in the middle of the article.
      I really hope that this is just a public pump for morons. For, if it is serious, then Dulles spins like a spinning top in a coffin, terrified by successors.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +2
    30 October 2015 13: 49
    I wouldn’t have the Internet, I’d live peacefully. How much shit would have passed by.
  4. +3
    30 October 2015 13: 52
    Now, if you disconnect the entire Internet for a month, then the guys from the State Department and the CIA have nothing to report to their godfather and satellite.
  5. +1
    30 October 2015 13: 53
    and if this Amerikos was offered to fly to SU as observing the fall of bombs at a position. well, in flight he would land this screamer on 100 kg ammunition and send him to determine the accuracy of the bombing.
  6. +4
    30 October 2015 13: 53
    Guys, the dog barks - the caravan is coming!
    We need to continue to do our own right thing and look less at the verbal diarrhea of ​​Western mongrels and their owners. We know the truth, what's what, and their trepidation is designed for their electorate, which successfully hangs noodles on their ears. Personally, my opinion is that all this hysteria (the so-called information war) is done in order to keep Western residents from taking off their pink glasses for a longer time, because uncertain shouts sound that they are simply (to put it mildly) deceived.
    The truth is on our side. You just need to do your job and wait for the whole world to stir from the fall of Western ideals. And do not help them save face - they are not worth it (proved by history) hi
    PS And for a reminder, about the truth, it does not interfere with constantly poking the "white and fluffy" Western muzzle into their own openable sewage and catching on contradictions. People believe the evidence, not the unsubstantiated "we think so" and their "reliable" sources
  7. +4
    30 October 2015 13: 57
    Yes, pendotrolls even get money for money. Isn't it time to hold a free promotion - "yankee go home!"
  8. +2
    30 October 2015 14: 00
    I suspect that the “media”, which was interviewed by Mr. Stevens, is either “Rain” or “echo” 2 in the form of “Echoes from him.” Other media would not have turned to this source.
  9. +6
    30 October 2015 14: 01
    Quote: Rurikovich
    Guys, the dog barks - the caravan is coming!
    We need to continue to do our own right thing and look less at the verbal diarrhea of ​​Western mongrels and their owners. we know the truth, what's what, and their trepidation is designed for their electorate, which successfully hangs noodles on their ears.

    Yes, Putin and our Foreign Ministry behave like that ..! And such behavior of Russia, oh, how enrages Western politicians ..))))
  10. +3
    30 October 2015 14: 02
    I would like to emphasize the rich vocabulary of the representative of the RF Ministry of Defense. A lot of words - different and offensive, to torment translating. "Amen the heavens will not be abundant"! I remember in "Comedy" there was a good scene with Kharlamov about the translator lol
    1. 0
      31 October 2015 06: 27
      And through the phrase add "Yoshkin cat", Yokorny Babay "... and so on. Let the rest of their brain burst.
  11. 0
    30 October 2015 14: 03
    The louder the barking, the closer the target. laughing
  12. +1
    30 October 2015 14: 03
    statement by a spokeswoman for the American embassy in Moscow

    Quietly and calmly, this "secretary" should be asked to leave the territory of Russia in connection with activities that do not correspond to the position held. He can explain to the Russian authorities some aspects of American policy, but to draw conclusions, let alone openly slander about Russia's actions, I believe he has no authority.
    It was still not enough that under the guise of a foreign embassy on our territory there were self-appointed evaluators of our own position and actions in the world. Embassies have slightly different tasks.
    And in the place of the Ministry of Defense it would not be worth making excuses. This is the matter of the Foreign Ministry ... 24 hours to get ready, and "come on, goodbye"
  13. +2
    30 October 2015 14: 03
    These gentlemen simply do not know our Russian law "FOR THE BAZAAR SHOULD BE RESPONDED"
  14. 0
    30 October 2015 14: 04
    Goodwin, great and terrible, is getting ready to bend. After all, each exceptional has its own impossible mission. In the states, it’s to show the whole planet what kind of shit you DON’T NEED to be. The planet will take into account their merits.
  15. +1
    30 October 2015 14: 09
    Why is this exculpatory policy regarding the armed Syrian opposition? Is it really impossible to draw an analogy that when our planes are allowed to drop a couple of dozen containers on the territory of the states of America to support its armed opposition, then there will be talk about making claims. How is this generally understood: armed opposition to government forces or to whom?
  16. 0
    30 October 2015 14: 09
    It’s necessary when Obama arrives in Russia or somehow summons to introduce him not Mr. President, but the President of the country of liars in power of killers for the sake of oil, the first of the homodril of the American continent Mr. Obama
  17. 0
    30 October 2015 14: 10
    Yes, it’s time for them to cut the Internet cable so that they don’t talk much.
  18. +1
    30 October 2015 14: 31
    Everything is clear with the "snickers", but why does the USA dislike peaceful excavators so much? Or was the movie "Transformers" based on real events in the United States?
  19. +1
    30 October 2015 14: 33
    "..This publication is, of course, a rare journalistic success. Still, not every day you manage to read this. Straightly childish naivety .." Well done Konashenkov! As an argument and with a sense of venomous humor, an answer is prepared. And there would be more of our Russian offensive terms, so that the Bosko would break with the translation.
  20. +2
    30 October 2015 14: 36
    Quote: hydrox
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    And with intelligence too.

    But well done Konashenkov!
    Is Flamebear a U.S. intelligence or State Department?


    They stand each other. I wonder where is that line when they stop, when their Faberge will be in the hands of the IG?
  21. +1
    30 October 2015 14: 37
    Ukraine is the big Zhivopyrka. laughing
  22. +1
    30 October 2015 14: 55
    Social networks - the main source of information of the State Department, has long been known.
  23. 0
    30 October 2015 15: 12
    The United States dropped to the level of Poroshenko, which has been breeding for the second year ...
    A country that thrashes only with its tongue, but at the same time possesses, as everyone choirs say, huge potential in everything, is NEVER ALREADY HOLD.
    ANY FORK, A DESIRE TO CONSTANTLY DRAIN THE WORDY GARBAGE IN THE MEDIA, says that, having fallen to this, ALREADY NEVER RISE.
    You need to lose with a MUCH MORE DEFINITELY than even when you come out the winner.
  24. 0
    30 October 2015 15: 15
    Nevertheless, it must be said that the advance of the Syrian troops is terribly slow and chaotic. The threat from the capital (Damascus) has not been removed! Not a single large city has been cleared so far! Are the Syrians waiting for the Cossacks? Or is there no one to tell them?
  25. +2
    30 October 2015 15: 16
    Konashenkov - not just well done, but also, it turns out, well-read, erudite, apparently has not a bad education. Honestly, I didn’t hear about the gingerbread (I thought it was his personal dislike)) In general, it’s not just a talking head, comrade general ...
  26. +1
    30 October 2015 15: 37
    EPRST, I didn’t even know a word like that - "Zhivopyrka". Thanks to the general. smile
  27. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 58

    Someone he reminds me of. wink
    1. 0
      30 October 2015 16: 42
      A bit like each other. (See - No comment)
  28. +3
    30 October 2015 16: 24
    Quote: g1v2
    Someone he reminds me of. wink



    Elusive with a good education. wink
  29. 0
    30 October 2015 16: 24
    New word PAINT! Everyone recognized him.
  30. 0
    30 October 2015 16: 34
    I really want to, but do not order to speak out. -This is a US democracy. I hope that soon all this will collapse and the time will come to discuss and solve all problems.
  31. +1
    30 October 2015 16: 38
    I read at Kassad, laughed for a long time. John Kirby enchanting dolba.b speaks on the subject of the bombing of the air forces. State Department spokesman John Kirby, to a correspondent’s question, Gayane Chichakyan, does the United States have any evidence that the Russian Air Force has attacked a hospital in Syria, said it wouldn’t bring them.
    “We saw some media reports about this. And they heard certain groups of Syrians talking about it. I can say that we also have other operational information that leads us to the conclusion that the Russian strikes are directed not only against the IS - they cause collateral damage to some civilian infrastructure. We saw some information that makes us believe that Russian military aircraft hit the hospital, ”Kirby explained. At the same time, the director of the operational management of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Dominic Stillhart, said that the organization’s employees working in Syria could not confirm such serious accusations from the West against Russia.

    On a proposal to share evidence, the official representative of the State Department replied that he could not do this. The journalist noted that these are very serious accusations and the mere reports from an unnamed source in this case are clearly not enough. “Can you provide something more reliable?” She asked. “I think I just did it,” Kirby replied. “I said that we have information that leads us to believe that this is so.” “I'm not going to talk about it. I am not going to share intelligence from this rostrum. You asked me a direct question, I gave you a direct answer: we have reasons to believe in it, ”said a representative of the US State Department.

    “But Russia denies that this happened. These are very serious accusations, Chichakyan emphasized. - Do not you think that it is necessary to present evidence to the world community. You say that the US government believes that Russia has hit the hospitals. But where is the evidence? ” “I already said: we have information that leads us to believe that they did it,” John Kirby replied, adding again that he would not specify this statement. When asked who the source of this information is, the representative of the American department said that he had already answered this question "as honestly as he could."
    1. 0
      30 October 2015 16: 48
      I'm very glad I noticed. They are probably in agony and will "blurt out" any misinformation.
  32. 0
    30 October 2015 17: 39
    During World War II, 80% of US and British air strikes were carried out on cities with civilians (purposefully destroying the population and urban structure) and nothing prevents them from considering themselves "heroes and sole winners" in the bloodiest war of humanity.
  33. 0
    30 October 2015 17: 44
    I don’t understand: why do we take so seriously what the Americans will say? They listened to them for the sake of interest, took note that they said so and quickly forgot everything. And then we do it our way.
  34. 0
    30 October 2015 18: 45
    on the site of one of the Russian publications
    But isn’t it easier to just take and close such publications and take journalists under the guardianship of the FSB? Let it be cardinally effective.
    1. 0
      30 October 2015 22: 20
      Why close? Addresses, passwords and sponsors so that people know "their heroes". But in essence, Kirby from the State Department said, "the Russians bombed a hospital in Syria, we recorded it from a satellite, but this is a military secret and we will not show it." Well done. Likewise, we can state- We recorded the transfer of MANPADS by the Americans to the guys from ISIS, but if a NATO plane is shot down over Syria- We cannot publish the pictures, a military secret.
  35. 0
    30 October 2015 23: 56
    Quote: vovanpain
    I wish I could help Lavrov.

    And Shnurov as a translator!
  36. 0
    31 October 2015 01: 04
    Facebook has become Facebook