Military Review
Sign in Sign up

State Department: Before Convening the INF Committee, it is necessary to conduct Russian-American negotiations

36
Convening an intergovernmental commission on compliance with the INF Treaty will not bring results, you first need to hold bilateral Russian-American talks on this topic, reports RIA News statement by the representative of the bureau of control and compliance with agreements on arming State Department Blake Narendra.




“In the current environment, our (US) assessment is such that initially a bilateral approach could be more effective. We can reconsider our point of view in some respects ",
said Narendra.

In recent months, Moscow and Washington have increasingly accused each other of creating weaponssubject to the Treaty.

According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the specialized bilateral consultations that took place on September 11 in Moscow did not bring any results, since "Washington did not provide satisfactory answers to Russian questions."
Photos used:
newsgeorgia.ge
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. fox21h
    fox21h 28 October 2015 10: 30 New
    +9
    Walk the forest our dear "partners"
    1. Vladimyrych
      Vladimyrych 28 October 2015 10: 33 New
      +1
      They won’t go. It’s not profitable for them. And it’s profitable which thread to impose on us another killer agreement.
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 28 October 2015 10: 38 New
        14
        Quote: Vladimir
        They won’t go. It’s not profitable for them. And it’s profitable which thread to impose on us another killer agreement.

        But only in this case, an agreement with America will be beneficial to us. Oh dreams, dreams.
        1. veksha50
          veksha50 28 October 2015 10: 45 New
          +3
          Quote: vovanpain
          . Oh dreams, dreams.



          Hmm ... So, to get this uncle Obama’s hut, the means of INF will not be required ...
          We have enough funds to carry out a renovation in this hut ...
          1. Baikonur
            Baikonur 28 October 2015 10: 53 New
            +3
            to carry out European-style repair in this hut ..

            Better - RUSSIAN REPAIR! -
            ... we will destroy
            To the ground, and then
            We are ours, we will build a new world ...
            ("International")
        2. AdekvatNICK
          AdekvatNICK 28 October 2015 10: 49 New
          +5
          so much better
          1. podpolkovnik
            podpolkovnik 28 October 2015 10: 59 New
            +4
            Quote: AdekvatNICK
            so much better

            So - it’s also good ...
    2. milann
      milann 28 October 2015 10: 36 New
      +2
      Well, they know better from the State Department cellar.
    3. Finches
      Finches 28 October 2015 10: 36 New
      12
      In general, I think that all, or a very large part, of the agreements signed by Mikhail Raisovich should be reviewed and denounced, since the Stavropol combine was not guided by the national interests of the country when it was concluded! I would even say that was guided by the interests of another country!
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 28 October 2015 10: 44 New
        14
        Quote: Finches
        In general, I think that all, or a very large part, of the agreements signed by Mikhail Raisovich should be reviewed and denounced, since the Stavropol combine was not guided by the national interests of the country when it was concluded! I would even say-guided by the interests of another country!

        I support, especially here on such products, Washington, already sprayed with boiling water when it forced the hunchback to destroy them.
        1. veksha50
          veksha50 28 October 2015 20: 11 New
          0
          Quote: vovanpain
          when he forced the hunchback to destroy them.


          Under Gorbatov they were developed and put on combat duty ... But already a drunken pipe collector gave them under the knife ...

          PS I said - under Hunchback, but this is not thanks, but contrary to him ...
    4. marlin1203
      marlin1203 28 October 2015 10: 48 New
      +5
      What negotiations can happen?! .. after Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine? .. let's be honest with ourselves and with others. What is happening now is a quiet, creeping war. It’s already pointless to limit ourselves in armaments, all the more so because for a number of types of military and technical equipment we are bypassing our “partners”, or at least not inferior. And this is also a resource in international politics.
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik 28 October 2015 11: 42 New
        +1
        Quote: marlin1203
        What negotiations can be?! .. after Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine? ..

        I agree, but, unfortunately, negotiations are likely to be.
    5. Andrea
      Andrea 28 October 2015 11: 00 New
      0
      Quote: fox21h
      Walk the forest our dear "partners"
      If you believe our politicians, Russia has rigorously fulfilled and is fulfilling all international treaties (and who should we believe? what not the State Department, so many feces result from these).
      From this we can draw an empirical conclusion - the states definitely violate the agreement and, to cover up the dirty ass, blame Russia. It has always been ...
      That means a true, direct path to the taiga. laughing
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 28 October 2015 12: 35 New
        0
        The USA doesn’t need ground-based medium-range missiles in Europe; do they have Ohio submarines with cruise missiles, Virginia, Los Angeles, destroyers, what prevents the United States from installing nuclear warheads on cruise missiles and launching it from the sea in case of war?
        The only thing the United States can’t get our cities and military facilities, as before, when they had Pershing 2, which had a flight time of 5 minutes, but the United States is developing hypersonic weapons that can deliver a nuclear warhead to the target in the same 5 minutes in the European part of Russia, it will be enough for them only to hang the rocket to the plane, take off and can be launched over the territory of Europe.
  2. prabiz
    prabiz 28 October 2015 10: 33 New
    +6
    Agree with the Americans - do not respect yourself!
  3. rumiigo
    rumiigo 28 October 2015 10: 33 New
    0
    "Partners" seems to be a little zabz ... and
    1. DMoroz
      DMoroz 28 October 2015 10: 35 New
      +1
      "... We can reconsider our point of view in some respects,"

      That’s what Salute Caliber does laughing
      Although the Caliber itself is a cruise missile, not related to ground-based missiles, therefore it does not fall under the INF Treaty.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 28 October 2015 10: 34 New
    +1
    Mericatos swelled, and rang out after Caliber? laughing
  5. Altona
    Altona 28 October 2015 10: 35 New
    +4
    And why should we negotiate alone with Washington? China has rolled out a rather big cart of missiles to the parade, India probably has the same one, probably someone else too ... The balance in the region should be for our security, our INF (ground-based) states are not threatened, at least directly, geographically .. .
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 28 October 2015 10: 48 New
      +1
      Quote: Altona
      The balance in the region should be for our safety, Our INF (ground-based) states are not threatened by states


      Hmm ... That is, provided that they were sitting at home ... And they then have the bases how many close by, around us ???

      So this is a double and triple dishonest game ...
      It would be if they had a team of the whole team on the football field, and from our team - one libero and an empty net ...
  6. Scoun
    Scoun 28 October 2015 10: 36 New
    +4
    Dear readers of the magazine "Spark" ... for how many years we have been observing.

    “Washington did not provide satisfactory answers to Russian questions”.

    The wolf listens and eats.

    So we need to act not from the principle of speaking, but from the standpoint of national interest.
    PS.
    And fortunately, there are such advances.
  7. vladnn2015
    vladnn2015 28 October 2015 10: 38 New
    +3
    Quote: rumiigo
    slightly zabz ... and

    Underestimating the enemy is the worst thing that can happen!
    1. Tra-ta-ta
      Tra-ta-ta 28 October 2015 10: 55 New
      0
      Underestimating the enemy is the worst thing that can happen!
      Here is the comment on the topic:
      1. Siberia 9444
        Siberia 9444 28 October 2015 14: 43 New
        0
        I agree with you, and the transfer of three tanks and 100 infantrymen, this is also alarming for the Roberts to throw dust in their eyes, but gradually build strength near our borders.
  8. ivan bogomolov
    ivan bogomolov 28 October 2015 10: 39 New
    +1
    Neher agreed with them or something to discuss, let Gorbachev agree with them, he does it well. negative
  9. BOB044
    BOB044 28 October 2015 10: 40 New
    +4
    They are cunning USA. They deceive the partner that Bick Mage to eat.
  10. dmi.pris
    dmi.pris 28 October 2015 10: 41 New
    0
    With whom to talk? With deaf-deaf-mute? ABM let them liquidate (they won’t do it) -that's the main condition .. They naturally refuse, then follows a completely legitimate demarche from our side (there are medium-range missiles and much more). Yes and remind that the drunken ensigns Ivanovs are still alive, ready to always throw boots on the control panel ...
  11. veksha50
    veksha50 28 October 2015 10: 43 New
    +2
    "In recent months, Moscow and Washington have increasingly accused each other of creating weapons that fall within the scope of the Treaty ..."

    And they will continue to blame ... the United States is playing a speckled deck, Russia is again trying to play honestly ...
    With a sharpie you need to cheat, with the aggressor - aggressively ...

    These bilateral talks are intended only to once again lull Russia and quickly pull the blankets over the states ...

    They have no faith and should not be ...
    1. rf xnumx
      rf xnumx 28 October 2015 10: 53 New
      14
      Quote: veksha50
      They have no faith and should not be ...
      The credit of trust is fully exhausted ..
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. V.ic
    V.ic 28 October 2015 10: 55 New
    +1
    Yes, let the negotiations, only our conditions: dissolve NATO, shoot Piglet, Yaytsenyukha, cleanse the territory of Ukraine, stop the Sabbath in the Middle East.
  14. provincial
    provincial 28 October 2015 10: 59 New
    0
    They say "Obama wrote a statement and personally turned to V. Putin to obtain Russian citizenship"
    1. roskot
      roskot 28 October 2015 11: 55 New
      0
      What's again? Last time not accepted?
      And they say that he has been working for Russia for a long time. Not?
  15. Lelek
    Lelek 28 October 2015 10: 59 New
    0
    “In the current situation, our (USA) assessment is such that an initially bilateral approach could be more effective. We can reconsider our point of view in some respects. ”

    Again the same games by the same rules. In general, all arms reduction treaties should apply to all countries possessing weapons of the type under discussion, and the satillites in whose territories these weapons are located remain aside (and there is only one gang-watering can). stop
  16. cniza
    cniza 28 October 2015 11: 00 New
    +2
    Negotiations should be normal, but there will be no more concessions.
  17. inferno_nv
    inferno_nv 28 October 2015 11: 40 New
    0
    They will always be wrong! It may be enough to pay attention to their babbling from behind puddles. We live on our land and we don’t crawl towards them with our charter, but they can easily come to us, do it - do it, do we need it? am
  18. roskot
    roskot 28 October 2015 12: 00 New
    0
    What concessions can be in today's fight. Show the weakness - they will devour.
    American jackals are just waiting for this.
  19. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 28 October 2015 12: 21 New
    0
    Again, the star-stripes wanted to "steer" on the "road" the reduction of the INF Treaty, because without them nothing would be decided! But the emergence of this question is connected with the unilateral withdrawal of the United States from the ABM Treaty and the environment of Russia with its missile defense systems, which (by their own admission) can be used as launchers for the INF too! Here it is necessary to add that many states (which do not are in the Agreement) there are already INF and in large quantities! And now, having received a painful “click” on their “long nose”, which “they stick in where even the dog did not stick, screamed for convocation, etc. etc., it seems to me that Russia is already tired of these barren and useless meetings and all kinds of regular “negotiations”, which the United States usually “put with a big device” on your decisions! Calm down or just “heal” the gentlemen from a disease called “international lawlessness”, otherwise God forbid someone “heals you”
  20. AlexTires
    AlexTires 28 October 2015 13: 11 New
    0
    Great military strategists purely formally consider RSD only by name. But for the intended purpose, the missile defense system, which is located in Europe, and maybe in the Baltic states and Ukraine, is the same RSD.
  21. mamont5
    mamont5 28 October 2015 14: 23 New
    0
    Quote: fox21h
    Walk the forest our dear "partners"

    There is nothing for them to clog our forest.