Western journalist presents a selection of facts about the attacks of the US Army on civilian objects.

35
Western edition The Intercept It came out with a John (Yon) Schwartz material on how many times American forces attacked civilian targets during military operations. Schwartz cites many facts of this kind. One of these is a blow to a baby food factory in Baghdad in 1991. Then the Americans declared that they had struck due to the fact that Saddam Hussein used the plant to produce biological weapons. As it turned out later, the company did not produce any weapons. Washington made no official apologies.

Western journalist presents a selection of facts about the attacks of the US Army on civilian objects.


In the same 1991 year, Schwartz writes, an American bomber struck a bomb shelter in which civilians were hiding from an airstrike. Then more than 400 civilians died from American bombs.

In the 1999 year, as a result of the bombing of Yugoslavia, the F-15 aircraft launched missiles on the train. 14 people died, a few dozen were disabled. The Pentagon, trying to explain itself, announced that the train was moving at such a speed that the pilots, who had mistakenly fired the guided missiles, simply did not have time to react. It turned out that the US military lied, deliberately increasing the speed of video recording three times.

In 1999, the United States attacked a television center in Belgrade, killing 16 civilians.

There were also attacks on industrial enterprises in Sudan, which (enterprises) had nothing to do with terrorist groups, attacks on offices of various media outlets, including Al-Jazeera in Baghdad, and the shooting of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan from a helicopter. About Vietnam and can not speak ...

Now - and rocket bombardment of the Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz.

There are not enough facts for one, but for a dozen tribunals!
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +34
    8 October 2015 14: 31
    Someone decided to publish the truth in the West? It seems to me that the election campaign in the USA has reached a new level.
    1. jjj
      +16
      8 October 2015 14: 37
      The Americans also shied at the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. The story is dark there, the participation of special services has surfaced. China agreed to hush up the case
      1. +17
        8 October 2015 14: 46
        To paraphrase Cato Elder: Washington must be destroyed !!!
      2. +14
        8 October 2015 15: 42
        Have you forgotten about the "twin towers" on September 11? It has long been clear whose hands it was ...
      3. 0
        8 October 2015 23: 44
        Quote: jjj
        There are not enough facts for one, but for a dozen tribunals!

        What are the 10 tribunals? Are you kidding me? it will be right to say to several thousand tribunals
    2. +10
      8 October 2015 14: 38
      Lost the downed Iranian Airbus A300 in 1988.
      1. +5
        8 October 2015 15: 42
        In this way, the Americans tried to hide the secret of the absorbing cover of the F-117 aircraft that fell into the hands of the Chinese. Believe me, this is not a fake. There are a lot of secrets in these bombings of Yugoslavia, the actual losses of the NATO troops, the throw at Pristina. I already wrote about these secrets. Unfortunately Our countries also removed a lot about the operations and aviation of Yugoslavia and the Western countries. The NATO troops clearly didn’t want the whole world to know how they managed it. Why didn’t I hide our officials? In the specialized literature, I didn’t get through much.
    3. +14
      8 October 2015 14: 51
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Someone decided to publish the truth in the West?

      Why did they publish a lot of truth? Basra was burned with white phosphorus along with the inhabitants. If everything is dripped, there are hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people killed and this is only in the last 10 years.
      1. +1
        8 October 2015 21: 12
        Quote: Alexander Romanov

        Why did they publish a lot of truth? Basra was burned with white phosphorus along with the inhabitants. If everything is dripped, there are hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people killed and this is only in the last 10 years.

        What about depleted uranium shells and bombs?
    4. +3
      8 October 2015 14: 57
      Do you think someone read this article over the hill? crying an unpopular resource outside the zombie system. This is so, they say, we have freedom of speech - roll it off! And you will persevere - bury crying
  2. +13
    8 October 2015 14: 31
    And here is another Western journalist who wrote about the Russian army
    https://russian.rt.com/article/121685 wink
    Quote:
    "Expectation: the barracks is a barn or barracks in a penal camp from Solzhenitsyn's books.

    Reality: The barracks resembles a dormitory at US universities.


    One of the main reasons why I have not achieved anything in the army is my mentality or, better to say, the psychology of a lone wolf. It was unpleasant for me to stand in a huge common shower room next to the naked guys, like me. Therefore, I was pleasantly surprised that both shower taps and toilets are located in separate booths. Before the trip, I imagined the army toilet in the form of a concrete shed with a cesspool, but it turned out that everything was very decent, even privacy was respected. If all the Russian barracks have such conditions, then this greatly facilitates the service.
    The beds were very comfortable.
    There were 3 washing machines and a water filter in the barracks. There was a kettle too. But we didn’t have time at all to use it: we were busy all day - from lifting to hanging up.
    The soldiers of our unit told me that the living conditions here are very good, but in other barracks they are not much worse. "
    1. +6
      8 October 2015 14: 43
      Quote: Sith Lord
      And here is another Western journalist who wrote about the Russian army
      https://russian.rt.com/article/121685

      Thank you, Sergey, the article is funny. Tim Kirby, well done.
  3. +7
    8 October 2015 14: 32
    Yes, American warriors do this on purpose - in these cases, attacks on peaceful objects, they are one hundred percent sure that there are no MANPADS! But at military installations - not a fact! The majority is fighting not for the Motherland, but for grandmothers and future citizenship - and the dead do not need citizenship for the dead, so they dump where their deadly burden does not fall, the main thing is far from the front line!
    1. +2
      8 October 2015 17: 42
      I also came across information that Americans are paid for the number of departures, and not for the final result of each departure
  4. +1
    8 October 2015 14: 36
    God will punish them.
  5. 0
    8 October 2015 14: 41
    Just some kind of moral.
  6. 0
    8 October 2015 14: 42
    or stupid or scum !!!
  7. +4
    8 October 2015 14: 47
    crying Goodbye John (Yon) Schwartz, you were an honest man, let the earth rest in peace. You are not alone there are other truth-seekers and will continue your work crying
  8. +1
    8 October 2015 14: 52
    They have such tactics. Intimidate, bring chaos and fish in troubled waters. And all this from generation to generation. Time is showing. Living in a lie.
  9. +2
    8 October 2015 14: 55
    Remember, as in Hot Heads: If you fail to destroy the nuclear power plant, strike at secondary objects - this is the Pantomime School and the Accordion Factory.
  10. 0
    8 October 2015 15: 04
    The Western edition of The Intercept came out with material from John (Jon) Schwartz, dedicated to how many times American troops attacked civilian targets during military operations. Schwartz cites many similar facts.


    An interesting article, really hardly expected from the Western press. But there are still in the original articles and quite interesting comments, in many respects quite a bit different from the comments on any of our sites.
  11. +5
    8 October 2015 15: 12
    ISIS asked NATO to return the American bombing.
    1. +1
      8 October 2015 20: 51
      Quote: EvgTan
      ISIS asked NATO to return the American bombing.

      Are they more tolerant? Or take off without bk? Maybe they just don’t take off !? And I understand that they fly, but they don’t drop bombs but gifts, Santa Claus is bad !!! And it’s precisely because of the sobering of Hercules that I didn’t bring any gifts ...... de ... b ... b.
  12. +2
    8 October 2015 15: 12
    Quote: Max_Bauder
    God will punish them.

    I don't remember which of the science fiction writers said - "God either does not exist, or he is indifferent" ...
    In the light of recent events, this is very similar to the truth.
    1. +2
      8 October 2015 16: 08
      Quote: Karas
      In the light of recent events, this is very similar to the truth.

      Not only in light of recent events. God hid at all times. There were crusades and the Inquisition. Yes, and closer to us - World War II, for example. On the buckles of the Nazis was: God is with us. Yes, and the states believe that God gave them indulgence for bombing civilians.
      1. +1
        8 October 2015 18: 19
        from what is written on the buckles, or who shook the air with this name. the existence of God cannot be proved or disproved. And everyone will be responsible for their own affairs, words, thoughts.
  13. +2
    8 October 2015 15: 22
    Without a doubt, this is someone's pre-election move ... And after all this they are trying to "yap" at Russia? Russia has notified all military attachés, they are showing footage after the attacks on terrorists, showing an example of how to fight terrorism! Add to the hospital Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Vietnam, etc ... A decent list will be obtained. Can the UN Security Council be indicative of raising the question of the need to establish a tribunal for these crimes? And ask the guilty ones who gave orders to the US military!
  14. 0
    8 October 2015 15: 27
    We sober-minded people, regardless of the nation and political platform, know all this, the main thing is to convey to the zombie population of the United States, Canada, England, Australia, etc., etc. ...
  15. 0
    8 October 2015 15: 28
    I don’t remember that the POCKET tribunal judged the real criminal. They condemn only those who are objectionable to Americans and their lackeys. The idea is good, but at the moment it is not feasible.
    1. 0
      9 October 2015 00: 03
      It was Stalin who insisted on Nuremberg. USA and England he was not needed.
  16. +3
    8 October 2015 15: 32
    Shakespeare wrote in the 14th century: under the rags, an innocent sin is visible, and the mantle hides everything. Rich America can do anything, shut up everyone’s mouth and do its dirty deed.
  17. +1
    8 October 2015 15: 45
    Have you forgotten about the "twin towers" on September 11? It has long been clear whose hands it was ...
  18. 0
    8 October 2015 15: 52
    Quote: boris-1230
    under the rags an innocent sin is visible, and the mantle hides everything


    So you need to dress them in rags and then ... "but dress him in rags - you will pierce them with reeds (" King Lear ")"
  19. +1
    8 October 2015 16: 29
    They have already bombed themselves at the tribunal. The time will come and they will be asked.
  20. +1
    8 October 2015 16: 40
    American bombs carry democracy and occasional casualties only water the young tree of democracy sprouting in countries with totalitarian regimes. Do not worry citizens, everything is OK!
  21. +2
    8 October 2015 18: 47
    In Afghanistan, over 10 years of hostilities, there are dozens of such examples. No wonder Karzai drove the Americans.
  22. +1
    8 October 2015 20: 30
    The hypocritical Americans again stuck in a lie!
  23. 0
    8 October 2015 20: 51
    Enough and one tribunal, but brought to the well-deserved punishment of those responsible.
  24. 0
    8 October 2015 23: 49
    Hmm ... Bullshit!