Military Review

Washington is trying to attract the Russian Federation to the Western coalition against the IG

40
At the moment, cooperation on Syria with Moscow is only to ensure that hostilities in the country "do not come into conflict," RIA News statement by the representative of the US administration Josh Ernest.



"Now we are talking only about the involvement of the Russian Federation in the broad international coalition, Said Ernest. - In addition, our cooperation is limited to the fact that military actions (the United States and Russia in Syria) do not conflict. ”

He stressed that the strategic cooperation could not be discussed "as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State".

Recall, from September 30, at the request of Bashar al-Assad, the Russian Aerospace Forces began to launch targeted attacks on IS facilities in Syria. From the beginning of the operation, the Russian aviation has already inflicted more than 110 hits.
Photos used:
http://www.arms-expo.ru/
40 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. tronin.maxim
    tronin.maxim 8 October 2015 08: 27
    +22
    “Now we are only talking about attracting the Russian Federation to the broad international coalition.
    No, we don’t need such comrades!
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 8 October 2015 08: 30
      +21
      Thank you, we will handle it ourselves when this vulture was a bear comrade.
      1. Tanker55
        Tanker55 8 October 2015 08: 41
        +4
        Dear partners from America-Wonderland, we are doing what we always do and always did. In my opinion, this proposal came from Russia to the countries of the planet Earth from the beginning and it does not make sense to attract us to the Western coalition, we are all doing it right. Thank you. Join and help.
      2. Kostyar
        Kostyar 8 October 2015 08: 48
        +2
        into a broad international coalition

        Forgot to add: to the composition of the broad international coalition of BREAKERS !!!
        And it’s not as wide as they dream .....
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 8 October 2015 08: 36
      +10
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      No, we don’t need such comrades!

      It's just that Americans are now in the background, and they want to be the first.
      1. Varyag_1973
        Varyag_1973 8 October 2015 08: 53
        +1
        Coalition?! What kind of coalition ?! This is the one that is de * bil-overgrowth and its 60 jackals de * bilenos ?! Not robots, goose pig ....., I'm sorry, the bear is not a comrade to a tattered cock!
    3. little girl15
      little girl15 8 October 2015 08: 37
      +2
      How to understand? To drain B. Assad? To bomb hospitals and civilians? Well, there is no way for us with these "comrades".
    4. USSR 1971
      USSR 1971 8 October 2015 08: 41
      +2
      Come on, who would have thought? They invite us. If not for our aerospace forces and the Caspian flotilla, we would not be very interesting. Thank you for noticing and paying attention. It is not very positive to enter into a coalition with those who regularly "through a tragic mistake" bombard civilian objects and hospitals. Substitute n ..... sy, they are masters of this. It's better to do it yourself.
      Well, they are enemies for Russia, enemies, whoever pretends to be.
    5. Penetrator
      Penetrator 8 October 2015 08: 43
      +1
      strategic cooperation cannot be discussed "as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State."

      Pubic lice ran in, as if they were poured with kerosene. Aviation, in this case laughing But seriously, it seems that "our Western partners" do not know how to react to the current situation. Moreover, Russia constantly presents surprises - who was expecting the strike of the Kyrgyz Republic from the Caspian Sea? What else will these cunning Russians come up with? Pichalka ...
    6. Finches
      Finches 8 October 2015 08: 48
      +1
      Indeed! Well, them on ..., these "allies"! You will contact them and, forever, as in our glorious cinema it turns out:"How to fill up a Messer or" Foker "- so to fill up - so this is us, but how ...", public relations, but a grandmother cut down, so it's the Anglo-Saxons!
    7. Blondy
      Blondy 8 October 2015 09: 00
      +3
      In fact, Russia acts in accordance with international law, at the request of the leadership of a sovereign state, and it is invited to join an international gang that calls itself a coalition.
      1. tongilguk
        tongilguk 8 October 2015 11: 08
        0
        They do not even invite us, but they demand that we contribute to their coalition:

        as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the "Islamic State"


        And what is expected of us to contribute to this coalition?
      2. tongilguk
        tongilguk 8 October 2015 11: 09
        0
        They do not even invite us, but they demand that we contribute to their coalition:

        as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the "Islamic State"


        And what is expected of us to contribute to this coalition? To pay a membership fee for entering the coalition?
    8. marlin1203
      marlin1203 8 October 2015 09: 29
      0
      There is nothing to "sew a caftan to the sleeve". They do nothing and want to "enter paradise" on our hump.
    9. Vend
      Vend 8 October 2015 09: 34
      0
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      “Now we are only talking about attracting the Russian Federation to the broad international coalition.
      No, we don’t need such comrades!

      We ourselves can handle it. So the Syrians went on the offensive, Iran imposed a ban on negotiations with the United States.
    10. sherp2015
      sherp2015 8 October 2015 13: 59
      0
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      “Now we are only talking about attracting the Russian Federation to the broad international coalition.
      No, we don’t need such comrades!


      Based on the last "friendly" relations with the United States, when it showed its pig face, we must understand that there can be no common affairs with this dastardly state education
  2. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky 8 October 2015 08: 29
    +10
    while Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State

    A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?
    1. adept666
      adept666 8 October 2015 08: 33
      +12
      A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?

      No, this is to inform the "partners" of the place and time of attacks on the positions of the terrorists, so that they would quickly evacuate them from there before the strike of our Aerospace Forces and now the Navy smile
      1. Alexei
        Alexei 8 October 2015 08: 55
        +1
        Quote: adept666
        A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?
        No, this is to inform the "partners" of the place and time of attacks on terrorist positions,

        And also mark patrol routes, and constantly report on all movements of the Syrian army.
    2. hydrox
      hydrox 8 October 2015 08: 36
      +2
      Quote: Rokossovsky
      A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?


      No, it's to defend the one who bombed this hospital.
    3. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 8 October 2015 10: 00
      +1
      Quote: Rokossovsky
      A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?

      They still have a good shadow fight
  3. ibu355yandex.ru
    ibu355yandex.ru 8 October 2015 08: 29
    +1
    "Now we are talking only about attracting the Russian Federation to a wide international coalition," Ernest said. "Colleagues and partners, Russia does not need a war that has been stretched out for years, and with its shameful end. We now have a completely different military doctrine!
  4. kostyan77708
    kostyan77708 8 October 2015 08: 31
    +1
    There are comrades who are not comrades at all to us. laughing This is me about KALitsii mattresses and others like them))
  5. hydrox
    hydrox 8 October 2015 08: 33
    +2
    Interestingly, I understand the coalition as an organization with certain common goals, objectives and ways to solve them, but most importantly, with understandable ACTION to achieve these goals.
    So far, not only coincidences, but even contact between the goals, tasks and actions, we and the Yankees have not and BEING CANNOT be, if we want to remain leaders in the struggle against the unipolar world and have international authority.
  6. asadov
    asadov 8 October 2015 08: 36
    +1
    What for? Singing to someone else's tune? We are not tame and do not eat with our hands.
  7. Darkoff
    Darkoff 8 October 2015 08: 36
    +1
    A coalition is possible only under the leadership of the Russian Federation and after the revision by amers of their goals in Syria. The US has already demonstrated its failure.
  8. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 8 October 2015 08: 36
    +9
    Class! A gang of punks led by bandits is trying to draw into its ranks the only (!!!) country that makes a real contribution to the fight against terrorists, which this gang is covering up. Circus Dow.nov
  9. lopvlad
    lopvlad 8 October 2015 08: 37
    +4
    They want to put Russia in their own worth of US-controlled rams.
    Join the Russian coalition that has shown its effectiveness in just a week.

    Again they want to steal a victory from Russia.
  10. afrikanez
    afrikanez 8 October 2015 08: 39
    +3
    And who gave the amers the right to create any kind of coalition, if no one asked them about it. Let first they ask permission at the UN and then create it. And even more so, we should not be drawn into all kinds of illegal coalitions.
  11. Landwarrior
    Landwarrior 8 October 2015 08: 39
    +1
    The United States needs Russia only so that in the event of something, it would be someone to blame hi
  12. Erg
    Erg 8 October 2015 08: 40
    +1
    I catch myself thinking that the international "coalition" is simply getting underfoot.
  13. ssn18
    ssn18 8 October 2015 08: 44
    +2
    These are exceptional clever men. fool Who is it and who should join the coalition? I would like to answer with the words of S. Lavrov, breaking the Internet, but I'm afraid the moderators will not like it. laughing
  14. SPB 1221
    SPB 1221 8 October 2015 08: 46
    +2
    Wow, to attract Russia. They are prosecuted, and Russia can be politely asked! Although the question arises, who to join there? And if she joins, so I’ll have to bomb these mirages in the desert with these m / u / d / a / c / a / m /, as they have been doing this for a whole year!
  15. vicdoc63
    vicdoc63 8 October 2015 08: 46
    +2
    As a famous character (Gena crocadil) used to say: "Thank you, don't. You have a lot to do anyway."
  16. aszzz888
    aszzz888 8 October 2015 08: 47
    +1
    The latest statements of the mericatos in the media that they do not want to conflict with us, only in the air, so as not to create situations that could lead to the death of pilots. For more, they do not agree. But all the info coming from them changes every day, and several times a day. Like that weather vane in the wind! wassat
  17. SALLAK
    SALLAK 8 October 2015 08: 53
    +1
    A coalition means doing business and breeding smaller "brothers" ... And what has the United States to lose, anyway they sit across the ocean, refugees will not come ... And so money is cut and Europeans are drowned ...
  18. Flinky
    Flinky 8 October 2015 09: 01
    +1
    And we need it, your coalition?
  19. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 8 October 2015 09: 02
    +1
    When did common sense prevail in mattress? They always made "round" eyes and muttered something about universal human values. There is no reason to discuss a card game with cheaters.
  20. Vadimsh
    Vadimsh 8 October 2015 09: 03
    0
    Well, as usual, someone else’s thoughts were to be given out for their own, and what was not invited before
  21. YaMZ-238
    YaMZ-238 8 October 2015 09: 06
    0
    There is nothing to drag us into your HOLE! Then you will get out of figs !!! Russia is excellent and can cope alone, as the long history of the state proves.
  22. Sauron80
    Sauron80 8 October 2015 09: 10
    +1
    Quote: USSR 1971
    Well, they are enemies for Russia, enemies, whoever pretends to be.

    This is the most important thing not to forget, and to consider any proposal of theirs through the prism of fraud and betrayal - that is, where they can throw us in each case.
  23. Oman 47
    Oman 47 8 October 2015 09: 15
    +1
    The Russian Federation has its own coalition - the one that is "Coalition-SV". hi

    And anyway: WITHOUT SOAPY SUGAR SWEET.
  24. pia
    pia 8 October 2015 09: 29
    0
    But does our Great Russia need their coalition? The SGA, as always, is striving to divide the winning pie. What in the First, what in the Second World War was. Want to take part in the destruction of the IHL? Or grab your piece of OUR Victory? What can they offer us? How to destroy hospitals, excavators and wedding processions?
    Do you want to participate - ONLY on our terms.
  25. Thomas
    Thomas 8 October 2015 09: 36
    +1
    Washington is trying to attract the Russian Federation to the Western coalition against the IG

    In the meantime ...
    "The US Congress passed a bill with provisions on the provision of military assistance to Ukraine.
    We are talking about the possibility of transmitting to Kiev intelligence information and deliveries of various types of weapons: anti-tank weapons, mortars, systems that are served in battle by crew / crew, as well as ammunition, grenade launchers, and small arms. Counter-battery radars, “unmanned tactical aerial surveillance systems”, secure communications and electronic warfare can also be transmitted. In addition, it is allowed to spend funds on training “the armed forces and other security forces of the government of Ukraine” (http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2420263.html).
    Other resources are already discussing the timing of a new offensive in the Donbass.
    And how is it possible, after all this, to talk about something with the United States?
  26. Born in USSR
    Born in USSR 8 October 2015 09: 37
    0
    They also bombed a motorcycle near the terrorug. Those sadness how to fight now. In general, they are going ON THE SHOWING SOMETHING BATTLE HOPAK.
  27. Afinogen
    Afinogen 8 October 2015 09: 38
    +1
    It’s not difficult to understand what they want. Then they will say that, under our strict guidance, the terrorists were finished. No, bomb the excavators further, only yourself. lol
  28. Pupon63
    Pupon63 8 October 2015 09: 44
    0
    Quote: tronin.maxim
    No, we don’t need such comrades!

    In World War II, they were allies! And what came of it? No really! Enough! And now, apparently, they still want to command us, and then lay a bunch of "successes" of the coalition on the shoulders of Russia! And we already have our allies!
  29. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 8 October 2015 09: 54
    +1
    Such friends for x "th and the museum ...
  30. kizhe
    kizhe 8 October 2015 10: 33
    0
    Better to buy a car from us. Sponges roll up.
  31. renics
    renics 8 October 2015 11: 18
    0
    (He stressed that strategic cooperation cannot be talked about “as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State). facilities or hospitals with doctors without borders. Spending huge finances of taxpayers on this in vain and are outraged by the fact that the country's infrastructure is already beginning to collapse.
  32. Wolka
    Wolka 8 October 2015 11: 46
    +1
    Well, and why the heck goat button accordion ...
  33. teron
    teron 8 October 2015 12: 00
    +2
    And how to join them if they are there illegally?