Washington is trying to attract the Russian Federation to the Western coalition against the IG

At the moment, cooperation on Syria with Moscow is only to ensure that hostilities in the country "do not come into conflict," RIA News statement by the representative of the US administration Josh Ernest.




"Now we are talking only about the involvement of the Russian Federation in the broad international coalition, Said Ernest. - In addition, our cooperation is limited to the fact that military actions (the United States and Russia in Syria) do not conflict. ”

He stressed that the strategic cooperation could not be discussed "as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State".

Recall, from September 30, at the request of Bashar al-Assad, the Russian Aerospace Forces began to launch targeted attacks on IS facilities in Syria. From the beginning of the operation, the Russian aviation has already inflicted more than 110 hits.
Photos used:
http://www.arms-expo.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. tronin.maxim 8 October 2015 08: 27 New
    • 22
    • 0
    +22
    “Now we are only talking about attracting the Russian Federation to the broad international coalition.
    No, we don’t need such comrades!
    1. vovanpain 8 October 2015 08: 30 New
      • 21
      • 0
      +21
      Thank you, we will handle it ourselves when this vulture was a bear comrade.
      1. Tanker55 8 October 2015 08: 41 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Dear partners from America-Wonderland, we are doing what we always do and always did. In my opinion, this proposal came from Russia to the countries of the planet Earth from the beginning and it does not make sense to attract us to the Western coalition, we are all doing it right. Thank you. Join and help.
      2. Kostyar 8 October 2015 08: 48 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        into a broad international coalition

        Forgot to add: to the composition of the broad international coalition of BREAKERS !!!
        And it’s not as wide as they dream .....
    2. Alexander Romanov 8 October 2015 08: 36 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      No, we don’t need such comrades!

      It's just that Americans are now in the background, and they want to be the first.
      1. Varyag_1973 8 October 2015 08: 53 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Coalition?! What kind of coalition ?! This is the one that is de * bil-overgrowth and its 60 jackals de * bilenos ?! Not robots, goose pig ....., I'm sorry, the bear is not a comrade to a tattered cock!
    3. little girl15 8 October 2015 08: 37 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      What do you mean? Merge B. Assad? Bomb the hospital and civilians? Well, we really have no way with these "comrades".
    4. USSR 1971 8 October 2015 08: 41 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      C'mon, who would have thought? They invite. If it were not for our VKS and the Caspian flotilla, we would be somehow not very interesting. Thank you for noticing, paid attention. To enter into a coalition with those who regularly “by tragic mistake” bomb civil facilities and hospitals is somehow not very positive. Substitute n ..... sy, they are masters at that. Better somehow yourself.
      Well, they are enemies for Russia, enemies, whoever pretends to be.
    5. Penetrator 8 October 2015 08: 43 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      strategic cooperation cannot be discussed “as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State”.

      Pubic lice ran in, as if they were poured with kerosene. Aviation, in this case laughing But seriously, it seems that "our Western partners" do not know how to respond to this situation. Moreover, Russia constantly presents surprises - who was expecting the strike of the Kyrgyz Republic from the Caspian? What else will these treacherous Russians come up with? Pichalka ...
    6. Finches 8 October 2015 08: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Indeed! Well, they are on ..., these "allies"! You will contact them and, forever, as in our glorious movie it turns out:"How to messer up or" Foker "fill up - so fill up - this is us, but how ...", public relations, but a grandmother cut down, so it's the Anglo-Saxons!
    7. Blondy 8 October 2015 09: 00 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      In fact, Russia acts in accordance with international law, at the request of the leadership of a sovereign state, and it is invited to join an international gang that calls itself a coalition.
      1. tongilguk 8 October 2015 11: 08 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        They do not even invite us, but they demand that we contribute to their coalition:

        as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State


        And what is expected of us to contribute to this coalition?
      2. tongilguk 8 October 2015 11: 09 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        They do not even invite us, but they demand that we contribute to their coalition:

        as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State


        And what is expected of us to contribute to this coalition? To pay a membership fee for entering the coalition?
    8. marlin1203 8 October 2015 09: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      There is nothing "to sew a caftan to a sleeve". They don’t do anything and want to "enter paradise" on our hump.
    9. Vend 8 October 2015 09: 34 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      “Now we are only talking about attracting the Russian Federation to the broad international coalition.
      No, we don’t need such comrades!

      We ourselves can handle it. So the Syrians went on the offensive, Iran imposed a ban on negotiations with the United States.
    10. sherp2015 8 October 2015 13: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      “Now we are only talking about attracting the Russian Federation to the broad international coalition.
      No, we don’t need such comrades!


      Based on the latest "friendly" relations with the United States, when it showed its pig face, we must understand that there can be no common business with this vile state education
  2. Rokossovsky 8 October 2015 08: 29 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    while Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State

    A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?
    1. adept666 8 October 2015 08: 33 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?

      No, it is to tell the “partners” the place and time of the attacks on the positions of the terrorists, so that they promptly evacuated them from there before the strike of our air forces and now the Navy smile
      1. Alexei 8 October 2015 08: 55 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: adept666
        A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?
        No, it’s telling the "partners" the place and time of the attacks on the positions of the terrorists,

        And also mark patrol routes, and constantly report on all movements of the Syrian army.
    2. hydrox 8 October 2015 08: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Rokossovsky
      A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?


      No, it's to defend the one who bombed this hospital.
    3. Nyrobsky 8 October 2015 10: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Rokossovsky
      A constructive contribution - is this a hospital?

      They still have a good shadow fight
  3. ibu355yandex.ru 8 October 2015 08: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “Now we are only talking about attracting the Russian Federation to the wide international coalition,” Ernest said. “Colleagues and partners, Russia doesn’t need a war stretched out for years, with its shameful end. We now have a completely different military doctrine!
  4. kostyan77708 8 October 2015 08: 31 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    There are comrades who are not comrades at all to us. laughing This is me about KALitsii mattresses and others like them))
  5. hydrox 8 October 2015 08: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Interestingly, I understand the coalition as an organization with certain common goals, objectives and ways to solve them, but most importantly, with understandable ACTION to achieve these goals.
    So far, not only coincidences, but even contact between the goals, tasks and actions, we and the Yankees have not and BEING CANNOT be, if we want to remain leaders in the struggle against the unipolar world and have international authority.
  6. asadov 8 October 2015 08: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    What for? Singing to someone else's tune? We are not tame and do not eat with our hands.
  7. Darkoff
    Darkoff 8 October 2015 08: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    A coalition is possible only under the leadership of the Russian Federation and after the revision by amers of their goals in Syria. The US has already demonstrated its failure.
  8. Reserve buildbat 8 October 2015 08: 36 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Class! A gang of punks led by bandits is trying to draw into its ranks the only (!!!) country that makes a real contribution to the fight against terrorists, which this gang is covering up. Circus Dow.nov
  9. lopvlad 8 October 2015 08: 37 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    They want to put Russia in their own worth of US-controlled rams.
    Join the Russian coalition that has shown its effectiveness in just a week.

    Again they want to steal a victory from Russia.
  10. afrikanez 8 October 2015 08: 39 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    And who gave the amers the right to create any kind of coalition, if no one asked them about it. Let first they ask permission at the UN and then create it. And even more so, we should not be drawn into all kinds of illegal coalitions.
  11. Landwarrior 8 October 2015 08: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The United States needs Russia only so that in the event of something, it would be someone to blame hi
  12. Erg
    Erg 8 October 2015 08: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I catch myself thinking that the international "coalition" is simply getting underfoot.
  13. ssn18 8 October 2015 08: 44 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    These are exceptional clever men. fool Who is it and who should join the coalition? I would like to answer with the words of S. Lavrov, breaking the Internet, but I'm afraid the moderators will not like it. laughing
  14. SPB 1221 8 October 2015 08: 46 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Wow, to attract Russia. They are prosecuted, and Russia can be politely asked! Although the question arises, who to join there? And if she joins, so I’ll have to bomb these mirages in the desert with these m / u / d / a / c / a / m /, as they have been doing this for a whole year!
  15. vicdoc63 8 October 2015 08: 46 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    As the famous character used to say (Gena crocadile): "Thank you, don’t. You already have a lot to do."
  16. aszzz888 8 October 2015 08: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The latest statements of the mericatos in the media that they do not want to conflict with us, only in the air, so as not to create situations that could lead to the death of pilots. For more, they do not agree. But all the info coming from them changes every day, and several times a day. Like that weather vane in the wind! wassat
  17. SALLAK 8 October 2015 08: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Coalition, it means running a business and raising smaller “brothers” ... And what the United States has to lose, it’s all over the ocean, refugees will not sail ... And money is being cut and Europeans drowned ...
  18. Flinky 8 October 2015 09: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And we need it, your coalition?
  19. Mountain shooter 8 October 2015 09: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    When did common sense prevail among mattresses? They always made "round" eyes and muttered something about universal values. With cheaters, why not discuss a card game.
  20. Vadimsh 8 October 2015 09: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, as usual, someone else’s thoughts were to be given out for their own, and what was not invited before
  21. YaMZ-238 8 October 2015 09: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There is nothing to drag us into your HOLE! Then you will get out of figs !!! Russia is excellent and can cope alone, as the long history of the state proves.
  22. Sauron80 8 October 2015 09: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: USSR 1971
    Well, they are enemies for Russia, enemies, whoever pretends to be.

    This is the most important thing not to forget, and to consider any proposal of theirs through the prism of fraud and betrayal - that is, where they can throw us in each case.
  23. Oman 47 8 October 2015 09: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Russian Federation has its own coalition — the one that is Coalition-SV. hi

    And anyway: WITHOUT SOAPY SUGAR SWEET.
  24. pia
    pia 8 October 2015 09: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But does our Great Russia need their coalition? The SGA, as always, is striving to divide the winning pie. What in the First, what in the Second World War was. Want to take part in the destruction of the IHL? Or grab your piece of OUR Victory? What can they offer us? How to destroy hospitals, excavators and wedding processions?
    Do you want to participate - ONLY on our terms.
  25. Thomas 8 October 2015 09: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Washington is trying to attract the Russian Federation to the Western coalition against the IG

    In the meantime ...
    "The US Congress passed a bill with provisions on the provision of military assistance to Ukraine.
    We are talking about the possibility of transmitting to Kiev intelligence information and deliveries of various types of weapons: anti-tank weapons, mortars, systems that are served in battle by crew / crew, as well as ammunition, grenade launchers, and small arms. Counter-battery radars, “unmanned tactical aerial surveillance systems”, secure communications and electronic warfare can also be transmitted. In addition, it is allowed to spend funds on training “the armed forces and other security forces of the government of Ukraine” (http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2420263.html).
    Other resources are already discussing the timing of a new offensive in the Donbass.
    And how is it possible, after all this, to talk about something with the United States?
  26. Born in USSR 8 October 2015 09: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They also bombed a motorcycle near the terrorug. Those sadness how to fight now. In general, they are going ON THE SHOWING SOMETHING BATTLE HOPAK.
  27. Afinogen 8 October 2015 09: 38 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It’s not difficult to understand what they want. Then they will say that, under our strict guidance, the terrorists were finished. No, bomb the excavators further, only yourself. lol
  28. Pupon63 8 October 2015 09: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: tronin.maxim
    No, we don’t need such comrades!

    In the second world were allies! And what came of it? No, really! Enough! And now apparently they want to command us as well, and then lay a bunch of “successes” on the shoulders of Russia! And we already have our allies!
  29. MATROSKIN-53 8 October 2015 09: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Such friends for x "th and to the museum ...
  30. kizhe 8 October 2015 10: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Better to buy a car from us. Sponges roll up.
  31. renics 8 October 2015 11: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    (He emphasized that strategic cooperation cannot be discussed “as long as Russia refuses to make a constructive contribution to our broad coalition against the Islamic State.) Ordinary hypocrisy, even if in the USA they are outraged as Americans and the coalition fights ISIS bombing uninhabited facilities or hospitals with doctors without borders. Spending huge taxpayers finances on it and are indignant at the fact that the country's infrastructure is already beginning to collapse.
  32. Wolka 8 October 2015 11: 46 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, and why the heck goat button accordion ...
  33. teron 8 October 2015 12: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And how to join them if they are there illegally?