Tests of the blinding station of the enemy will begin this month.

33
Testing of the equipment created by the defense industry complex (part of Rostec) for “blinding” enemy ships will begin in 2 weeks on the frigate Admiral Fleet Soviet Union Gorshkov ", reports RIA News a message from a representative of the corporation.



According to the interlocutor, “the station is designed to suppress the visual-optical and opto-electronic channels of aiming observation (including night-vision devices) of small weapons and melee weapons. "

“At the frigate Admiral Gorshkov, state tests will now take place - they will begin approximately in two weeks,” he said.

“This ship station is intended for installation on surface ships of the second class, including landing craft, hovercraft, hydrofoil ships, various boats,” said a representative of the corporation. - several stations are put on frigates, their range depends on external weather conditions ".

“You can make such a station for the Ground Forces, some modification is needed. We are already doing this work, ”the source said, stressing that“ the effect of this device does not cause an irreversible effect on human vision. ”

“There is a Vienna Convention whereby a person who is not armed with optics cannot be blinded to irreversible action. If you hit with high-end optics, then there may already be consequences, ”he explained.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    6 October 2015 16: 58
    Marine "Khabina". It's good.
    Dark glasses in the eyes of the partner and do with him, Che Hosh.
    1. +14
      6 October 2015 17: 01
      "Eyepiece". And NATO will come up with some hellish name for this thing again. wassat
      1. mihasik
        +23
        6 October 2015 17: 30
        Quote: Oznob
        "Eyepiece". And NATO will come up with some hellish name for this thing again. wassat

        Judging by our fans in military circles to come up with original names for military equipment, it would be more likely something like: "Pansies").
        1. +3
          6 October 2015 17: 39
          Cat Basilio.
          1. jjj
            +1
            6 October 2015 18: 07
            And the day of triffids will come
          2. 0
            6 October 2015 18: 30
            Mole, Fog.
        2. 0
          6 October 2015 18: 25
          Quote: mihasik
          Quote: Oznob
          "Eyepiece". And NATO will come up with some hellish name for this thing again. wassat

          Judging by our fans in military circles to come up with original names for military equipment, it would be more likely something like: "Pansies";).

          "Go to Kiev and ask (who Panikovsky was before the revolution)."
          what Longish, but in the wickedness of the day. laughing
          1. mihasik
            0
            6 October 2015 18: 56
            Quote: Vasek
            "Go to Kiev and ask (who Panikovsky was before the revolution)."

            I was in Kiev in 2012, I liked it, I even wiped Ponikovsky’s boot), but now something isn’t pulling there).
      2. +2
        6 October 2015 18: 57
        "Glazanage @ punatyatel" .....
    2. 0
      6 October 2015 19: 27
      Alternatively, they could adapt Krasukha-4 to the marine version, the jamming range is up to 300 kilometers, it can also work on satellites in orbit (I read it on the Internet, I can’t presume to confirm the reliability of the last statement).
    3. +1
      6 October 2015 20: 37
      Quote: Irokez
      Marine "Khabina". It's good.
      Dark glasses in the eyes of the partner and do with him, Che Hosh.

      No. This naval "Compression" is a former laser tank of the son of the USSR Defense Minister Ustinov. Not a bad constructor by the way. Nature did not rest on her son. He seems to have died of a heart attack, it's a pity. The principles are different, not electronic warfare. Not just blind - it destroys optics and electronics. The Chinese in troubled times stole our documentation, now they are armed with several tanks "compression" a few because the very expensive ones did not go en masse to the army for the same reason, they only mastered two. The fact that they put on the ships is very pleasing, the efforts of Soviet designers and workers, as well as the fabulous expenses of the USSR budget for its creation, were not in vain, and the memory of the general designer.
    4. +1
      6 October 2015 21: 55
      Well, like, but I was fucking staring))))
  2. +3
    6 October 2015 17: 00
    Quote: Novel 1977
    At the Northern Fleet, the Admiral Kuznetsov BS is also preparing for a military campaign, which at the end of November with the updated air group and possibly with the Admiral Gorshkov will also leave for Mediterranean ...

    An interesting coincidence, or an incorrect assumption?
    1. +2
      6 October 2015 23: 09
      Quote: MainBeam
      An interesting coincidence, or an incorrect assumption?
      Are you talking about the author’s blunder?
      This ship station is designed for installation on surface ships second class,
      Confused ranks and classes ... ???
      I want to say that ships of the second rank can also be ACE-CLASS! I really want this to happen to the new frigates!
      1. 0
        7 October 2015 06: 07
        Russian peoples became "Russians", ships instead of ranks began to be divided into "classes", BODs became "frigates", patrol ships became "corvettes", it remains to wait when the sailors will be converted into someone, like everything else ... This makes life more understandable and simpler, or, on the contrary, are they confused so that it is easier to fool the next generations? Although, no wonder - since the end of the century such a system has been established.
        1. 0
          7 October 2015 09: 15
          Since there is a VKS - aerospace forces, it is necessary to do sea-cosmic forces already. Moreover, the station (ISS) for them in orbit for a long time ...
          And if you want, we will make space-sea forces. The same abbreviation will be sickly - CCM
  3. +7
    6 October 2015 17: 04
    Eyes are hard ... On the other hand, we are not, life is like that.
  4. VP
    +5
    6 October 2015 17: 05
    What does "close combat" and "small arms" have to do with it?
    Are you going to board boarding?
    1. +1
      6 October 2015 23: 34
      Quote: VP
      Are you going to board boarding?

      No ... At the last frontier of air defense, they are dazzling optical GOS RCC. RLK they will clog EW stations. MZA and SAM air defense will try to knock down on approach, Devices for jamming (PK-2; 10; 16; LK-101) - take them away from the side ...
      And all this is called the air defense of the NK with the enemy's IOS.
  5. +4
    6 October 2015 17: 08
    Now they won't even look through binoculars ... Batten down the windows - you have an "Aegis", though sometimes it also fades - well then, only in the latrine.
    1. 0
      7 October 2015 09: 19
      To the touch! Just touch.
  6. +1
    6 October 2015 17: 10
    Quote: MainBeam
    Quote: Novel 1977
    At the Northern Fleet, the Admiral Kuznetsov BS is also preparing for a military campaign, which at the end of November with the updated air group and possibly with the Admiral Gorshkov will also leave for Mediterranean ...

    An interesting coincidence, or an incorrect assumption?

    Time will tell, but something, in my opinion, does not attract coincidence.
  7. +9
    6 October 2015 17: 14
    "Tests of the station "blinding" the enemy"...

    Was it worth it to test the station’s capabilities so loudly ???

    Still, they did the right thing in Soviet times, when all the latest developments were secret ...

    Firstly, it will turn out-not get the effect that they wanted to achieve ...

    Secondly, let it be a "pleasant surprise" for the enemy ...
    1. 0
      6 October 2015 17: 19
      Quote: veksha50
      "Tests of the station "blinding" the enemy"...

      Was it worth it to test the station’s capabilities so loudly ???

      Still, they did the right thing in Soviet times, when all the latest developments were secret ...

      Firstly, it will turn out-not get the effect that they wanted to achieve ...

      Secondly, let it be a "pleasant surprise" for the enemy ...


      Well, if they’re shining, then they’ve already tested in classified mode. Pull the enemy will catch up and control the tests .... getting on the brain))))
      1. +1
        6 October 2015 18: 29
        Quote: meriem1
        Well if they shine

        So it's time to light up the "development".
  8. +7
    6 October 2015 17: 17
    Quote: Oznob
    "Eyepiece". And NATO will come up with some hellish name for this thing again. wassat

    Pansies would sound beautiful)
  9. +5
    6 October 2015 17: 24
    “There is a Vienna Convention whereby a person who is not armed with optics cannot be blinded to irreversible action. If you hit with high-end optics, then there may already be consequences, ”he explained.

    There is and much is forbidden! But this never prevented the globalists, with their Washington godfather, from using prohibited weapons, such as cluster bombs! Or a recent example, when Svidomo punishers from the ATO bombed Novorossia with phosphor bombs, and Western zealots of shit democracy got water in their mouths! So we must be prepared that, in which case, all types of prohibited weapons will be used against us and therefore we must develop EVERYTHING ourselves!
  10. +1
    6 October 2015 17: 28
    Undermining a small nuclear charge high in the atmosphere and all blind and deaf ... Radars and all the electronics in a landfill. And then something seems much cooler, judging by the description. good
    1. +1
      6 October 2015 23: 46
      Quote: Tatar 174
      Undermining a small nuclear charge high in the atmosphere and all blind and deaf ...
      Communications and radar will probably sit down (and not all bands), but I wouldn’t say this about the EMV optical range ... Well, ionization will lead to the northern lights ... it will be brighter! bully
  11. -3
    6 October 2015 18: 16
    How glad we are for this message ........ fellow good drinks
    And if the analogue is on the enemy's ship? How will we react to this? Before we "invent" something, claiming that we will fuck them all ... tear, sorry, "blind" would be appropriate to think about our sailors. And not only about them. Russia is not a super-duper country that can do something that others cannot. Physics cannot be fooled. And if the adversary gives the same task, create a blinding weapon. We will also rejoice ...

    In general, all these innovations must be controlled or banned. Like weapons of mass destruction and the like. For it does not kill, but makes a person crippled (blind) for life. It would be good in this situation, if only we could create this. But alas. Others can do it too. And that means that it will be worse for us. So joy is not appropriate here
    1. +1
      7 October 2015 00: 04
      Quote: Old26
      Russia is not a superfood country capable of doing something that others cannot.
      Volodya, I don’t recognize you today!
      Russia is capable, unlike other countries, * to look beyond the horizon *. We will pull up the industrial base and group "A" - and no states with Europe will follow us!
      Quote: Old26
      it does not kill, but makes a person crippled (blind) for life.
      On the ship, on a combat alert, everyone is sitting at * battened down * combat posts. A maximum of 2-3 people (running post pr, lion boards, central control center) stare at the periscopes. The rest are * watching TV *, and the * Chameleon * optics are a flash (radiation) ... and it becomes a "light filter".
      And now, they say, * nano * generally does miracles ... True, it is "behind the scenes". And Chubais (the redhead) has nothing to do with it: even he cannot stop technical progress.
      IMHO.
  12. +1
    6 October 2015 18: 37
    For those who begin to screech about this - do not look at us and you will not lose sight
  13. 0
    6 October 2015 18: 52
    How much the sea battle of the optical channel depends, I think there is too little data for a real discussion.
    1. +1
      7 October 2015 00: 13
      Quote: APASUS
      How dependent is the naval battle of the optical channel

      Modern naval battle is an overseas affair! Aviation and anti-ship missiles are the long arm of the fleets. Optical channel - a self-defense channel for AIA, a guidance channel for anti-ship missiles, a channel for central control and additional reconnaissance. It is to this extent that it depends on the optical channel.
  14. 0
    6 October 2015 19: 10
    visual-optical and optical-electronic channels for aiming observation (including night vision devices) of small arms and melee weapons

    I wonder why such a thing on ships?
  15. +3
    6 October 2015 19: 59
    In addition to blinding, you must put in a stunning system, so as not to hear their cries about blinding.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +1
    6 October 2015 20: 56
    This is not HIBINS or BEAUTY. This naval "Compression" - a former super-secret laser tank of the son of the USSR Defense Minister Ustinov. Not a bad constructor by the way. Nature did not rest on her son. He seems to have died of a heart attack, it's a pity. The principles are different, not electronic warfare. It doesn't just blind - it destroys optics and electronics. The Chinese in troubled times stole our documentation, now they are armed with several tanks "compression" a little because the very expensive ones did not go into the army en masse for the same reason they mastered only two. The fact that they put on the ships is very pleasing, the efforts of Soviet designers and workers, as well as the fabulous expenses of the USSR budget for its creation, were not in vain, and the memory of the general designer.
    1. 0
      14 October 2015 22: 11
      as I read today about one of our weapons - "They just took it out" from under the cloth, "they removed it under the USSR, but now they got it." And the most unpleasant thing for NATO and other enemies is that the weapons of the Soviet defense industry are still extremely dangerous
  18. 0
    14 October 2015 21: 58
    Thank you, I didn’t know about the Vienna Convention