Iraqi Prime Minister: Baghdad does not object to Russian aviation strikes against militant positions

77
Iraqi Prime Minister Heydar al-Abadi said in an interview with Al Jazeera that the government does not mind the attacks of the Russian aviation according to the positions of the militants of the Islamic State, emphasizing that “he sent a request to Moscow about this,” reports "Lenta.ru".



According to him, such an appeal to “all with a view to confronting the IG” is in the sphere of interests of Iraq.

On September 30, the Russian Aerospace Force began inflicting pinpoint airstrikes on militant positions of the Islamic State terrorist organization. The aviation group of the Russian Federation participating in the operation consists of 50 helicopters and airplanes, including Su-24M, Su-25 and Su-34.

In the first three days, the Russian pilots made more than 60 sorties, attacking IG objects over 50.
77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    5 October 2015 08: 25
    The appeal in triplicate. rooks do not care where to pest pests ..

    http://pavel-shipilin.livejournal.com/487714.html
    1. +10
      5 October 2015 08: 33
      I wonder where the breakthrough of money that the United States poured into Iraq and its army happened. True, their stability in the region was not at all interesting.
      1. +53
        5 October 2015 08: 37
        Quote: vodolaz
        I wonder where the breakthrough of money that the United States poured into Iraq and its army happened. True, their stability in the region was not at all interesting.


        For money poured into Georgia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia were acquired. for the money poured into Ukraine, Crimea has already been acquired and bargaining is underway for the rest ... for the money poured into Syria, the Air Force base in Latakia has already been acquired ... I can’t say what they will get in Iraq .. America is a generous soul .. laughing
        1. +17
          5 October 2015 08: 44
          Iraqi Prime Minister Heydar al-Abadi said in an interview with Al-Jazeera that the government does not object to attacks by Russian aircraft on positions of Islamic State militants, stressing that "a request for this was sent to Moscow," the Tape reports. .RU".
          Well, now things have gone, let those wishing to receive help from Russia in the queue are recorded as if they were going to see a doctor. We will cure everyone! With hot iron we will burn out the terrorist infection! And it’s better to do this away from our borders.
        2. +3
          5 October 2015 09: 38
          Quote: vorobey
          America is a generous soul ..

          Long live the sponsors and patrons of arrogant Saki origin !!! Hooray!!! laughing
        3. +2
          5 October 2015 10: 44
          Iraqi Prime Minister Heydar al-Abadi said in an interview with Al-Jazeera TV that the government does not object to attacks by Russian aircraft on positions of Islamic State militants, stressing that "he sent a request to Moscow"
          Base point for the fleet in the Persian Gulf and not any problems with help.
        4. 0
          5 October 2015 10: 50
          There are a lot of things in Iraq, there were enough of our investments there before the defeat of Gaddafi, a return with interest. Yes drinks
          1. +1
            5 October 2015 13: 39
            There are a lot of things in Iraq, there were enough of our investments there before the defeat of Gaddafi, a return with interest.
            Gaddafi in Libya, although both there and there are our investments.
          2. 0
            5 October 2015 13: 43
            Quote: duche
            There are a lot of things in Iraq, there were enough of our investments there before the defeat of Gaddafi, a return with interest. Yes drinks

            FAQ - what other Gaddafi?
            1. +1
              5 October 2015 14: 00
              Quote: rrrj
              Quote: ducheThere are a lot of things in Iraq, there were enough of our investments there before the defeat of Gaddafi, a return with interest. FAQ - what other Gaddafi?


              A ghost walks around Europe ...
        5. +1
          5 October 2015 14: 01
          Quote: vorobey
          Quote: vodolaz
          I wonder where the breakthrough of money that the United States poured into Iraq and its army happened. True, their stability in the region was not at all interesting.


          For money poured into Georgia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia were acquired. for the money poured into Ukraine, Crimea has already been acquired and bargaining is underway for the rest ... for the money poured into Syria, the Air Force base in Latakia has already been acquired ... I can’t say what they will get in Iraq .. America is a generous soul .. laughing


          Ask Barack to sponsor the 2018 World Cup?
      2. +8
        5 October 2015 08: 38
        Quote: vodolaz
        I wonder where the breakthrough of money that the United States poured into Iraq and its army happened. True, their stability in the region was not at all interesting.

        Let us believe old McCain's word:
        If we talk about the fighters trained by the Department of Defense [USA], then there are only 4-5 of them left, which increases the cost of training each up to 8-9 million dollars.
        1. +11
          5 October 2015 08: 45
          It seems to me that our main task now is to help Assad, and when his troops start driving terrorists out of the country, then ours will be able to strike at ISIS in Iraq. And now we are not able to disperse our forces, "after two birds with one stone" you know what happens. So, as much as we all would not like the success of our air force in Iraq, I think this should be postponed. We still have too many things to do in Syria.
          1. +6
            5 October 2015 08: 50
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            It seems to me that our main task now is to help Assad, and when his troops start driving terrorists out of the country, then ours will be able to strike at ISIS in Iraq. And now we are not able to disperse our forces, "after two birds with one stone" you know what happens. So, as much as we all would not like the success of our air force in Iraq, I think this should be postponed. We still have too many things to do in Syria.

            Good morning Sanya in a nearby branch posted an analysis of Jacob Kedmi ...

            we don’t have to intervene inside ... there the Iraqis and Iranians will be raiding the earth ..
            http://pavel-shipilin.livejournal.com/487714.html Свергая Саддама где у власти были Сунниты Американцы привели Шиитов к власти подложив сами себе свинью...
            1. +2
              5 October 2015 09: 21
              Quote: vorobey
              Good morning Sanya in a nearby branch posted an analysis of Jacob Kedmi ...

              we don’t have to intervene inside ... there the Iraqis and Iranians will be raiding the earth ..

              Good afternoon, namesake!
              I understand that we will not be present on earth. But we must not forget that we are far from our country, and to deliver even ammunition, we need time, and we need it very much, while in Syria. I am not opposed to a strike on Iraq, but at the moment I think that spraying is not right. I can imagine what the technicians now have, and if Iraq is added, then we will have to increase the number of sorties and accordingly their work will increase by an order of magnitude. I'm not talking about the pilots themselves. In general, I think it’s not yet time to work on two fronts. hi
              Thanks for the link!
            2. +1
              5 October 2015 10: 37
              Intervening in a conversation. No, what the States wanted, they got it. Headache in Europe, China and Russia. Not to mention the peoples of Libya, Iraq and Syria.
              1. +1
                5 October 2015 11: 31
                Quote: NordUral
                No, what the States wanted, they got it. Headache in Europe, China and Russia. Not to mention the people of Libya, Iraq and Syria


                a headache is treated, with own hemorrhoids it is more difficult ... they themselves acquired it both internal and external ...
          2. +3
            5 October 2015 08: 53
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            W. Here when his troops begin to drive terrorists out of the country, then ours will be able to hit ISIS in Iraq.

            You feel sorry for the bombs.
            1. +1
              5 October 2015 09: 26
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              You feel sorry for the bombs.

              I do not mind, because I do not have them! smile Are you sure that we have enough of them to bomb Iraq as well? I understand that they were brought to Syria with a reserve, but they hardly counted on Iraq yet. Maybe now, at this very moment, we are bringing in - and this is the time. So you shouldn't wave a saber ahead of time - "the giraffe is big, he knows better!"
              1. +1
                5 October 2015 09: 47
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                I understand that they were brought to Syria with a margin, but it was unlikely that they were counting on Iraq so far.


                current coordination center for some reason in Iraq .. Sanya hi
                1. +1
                  5 October 2015 13: 36
                  Quote: vorobey
                  current coordination center for some reason in Iraq .. Sanya

                  The coordination center in Iraq, and the decision is made in Moscow. hi
        2. 0
          5 October 2015 22: 26
          Quote: Tusv
          Let us believe old McCain's word:
          If we talk about the fighters trained by the Department of Defense [USA], then there are only 4-5 of them left, which increases the cost of training each up to 8-9 million dollars.

          what are they, 4 terminators did? wassat
      3. +6
        5 October 2015 08: 53
        Quote: vodolaz
        I wonder where the breakthrough of money that the US poured into Iraq and its army happened.

        Offshore should be sought.
        And so judging by the map, will we reach Iraq from our territory? For example, from Armenia winked
      4. +2
        5 October 2015 09: 10
        There is a Vangard asset management company called. The trash of the whole backstage. That's where you need to look for this money. A lot of things done by phasington (without whitewashing this cube) are created by emissaries of this company on behalf of phashington. So they happen to the CIA and other troubles. Yes, and put on their money to us, what you are right about is
        Quote: vodolaz
        True, their stability in the region was not at all interesting.

        They were interested in there "quite the opposite"
      5. +2
        5 October 2015 09: 37
        Quote: vodolaz
        I wonder where the breakthrough of money that the United States poured into Iraq and its army happened. True, their stability in the region was not at all interesting.

        What stability ??? belay If they are interested in anything, it is global instability, but it can be fraught with instability, which can cover any stability. wassat Nevermind scalamburil! laughing
      6. 0
        5 October 2015 10: 34
        The interest of the States was and is in the creation of a huge zone of instability with its overflowing to Europe, Asia and Russia.
    2. +3
      5 October 2015 08: 58
      No, well, Iraq, like Syria, had its own aviation and rather big ones! Where did you go! IS THE MONEY AMERICAN? All the same, the fine mechanism of the army - "started up" a little, underfunded and that's it, nothing flies, does not drive and does not shoot properly ...
      1. +1
        5 October 2015 09: 41
        Quote: marlin1203
        No, well, Iraq, like Syria, had its own aviation and rather big one! Where did it go!

        The Iraqi Air Force suffered heavy losses back in 1991, what was left was destroyed on the ground in 2003.
    3. +8
      5 October 2015 09: 05
      I liked the comment there.

      About "moderate and simple terrorists" read on the Internet;

      "As a well-known journalist of the leading publication of the exclusive and democratic West, having asked permission from the editorial office, he called the General Staff of the Russian Ministry of Defense with the question:
      - How do you distinguish between ordinary terrorists and moderate ones during the bombing in Syria?
      The girl switched me to the duty officer, who very politely explained:
      - Even before the start of the military operation in Syria, a decisive decision was made at the General Staff of the Russian Defense Ministry. The essence of this decision is our traditional desire for Russia to strictly abide by the principles of legality and justice. So now, all of our ammunition is divided into two categories: ordinary and moderate. Against ordinary terrorists, we use exclusively conventional ammunition. And against moderate terrorists, we use exclusively moderate ammunition. So don’t worry, we take into account the moderation of some of the terrorists and treat them fairly.
      After these words, it became much easier for me. But I still clarified:
      “Do you really use mild ammunition against moderate terrorists, is that true ?!”
      The interlocutor replied:
      - The word of the Russian officer!
      I felt very good. To bring final clarity, I asked:
      - Tell me, how much do your conventional ammunition differ from the moderate ones?
      - Our conventional ammunition differs from moderate ammunition, exactly as much as ordinary terrorists in Syria, differ from moderate terrorists: they are painted with a different paint, in lighter and more moderate colors - the officer answered and hung up. "
      1. 0
        5 October 2015 22: 32
        Quote: anfil
        - Our conventional ammunition differs from moderate ammunition, exactly as much as ordinary terrorists in Syria, differ from moderate terrorists: they are painted with a different paint, in lighter and more moderate colors - the officer answered and hung up. "

        wisely answered, Well done! laughing laughing laughing
    4. +1
      5 October 2015 09: 10
      It is necessary from the beginning in Syria to finish later for Iraq!
      1. 0
        5 October 2015 10: 41
        So these gangsters will cross from Syria to Iraq and wherever else they can. Water them immediately and everywhere, but only in conjunction with the armies of Syria and Iraq. And with the Kurds, giving them weapons and ammunition.
    5. 0
      5 October 2015 09: 16
      So let Russia be officially asked about it. Let's consider. Yes, only the government in Iraq is a puppet of the "moderate opposition".
      1. 0
        5 October 2015 10: 43
        The moderates also want to live. But ISIS and its tail have already set fire to them, all the more so since there are many officers of the old Iraqi army in it who don’t have any friendship for the present.
    6. 0
      5 October 2015 22: 23
      Of course, in Iraq there will be goals in the form of warehouses and training and management bases, and main goals. Otherwise it will not be good if ISIS will be supplied from there in Syria
  2. +2
    5 October 2015 08: 27
    Well, the fact that "does not mind" is just understandable, BUT "petition" would be official with a request for HELP indicating the reasons for dissatisfaction with the actions of the "coalition from fascinatington" ...
    1. +4
      5 October 2015 08: 31
      Dumb, to be honest. Iraq is an American plot, at least the United States thinks so. We can get a terrible pain in the neck ... I hope that the Russian leadership calculated all such risks. We'll see.
      1. +1
        5 October 2015 08: 34
        Quote: Penetrator
        Iraq is an American plot, at least the United States thinks so.


        Iranian plot ... Iranian ... Now Shiites rule there, unlike Saddam ..

        The Americans planted a pig for themselves ..
        1. +1
          5 October 2015 09: 49
          Quote: vorobey
          Quote: Penetrator
          Iraq is an American plot, at least the United States thinks so.


          Iranian plot ... Iranian ... Now Shiites rule there, unlike Saddam ..

          The Americans planted a pig for themselves ..

          Exactly - what a pig! The Americans pay money, and the Iranians rule there building a Shiite state in many respects on Iranian patterns for US money. bully
  3. +11
    5 October 2015 08: 28
    Well, it looks like the prime minister of Iraq will wait for a color revolution, the stripes will go out for poop, they will get another kick and where? In the country they occupied.
  4. +6
    5 October 2015 08: 28
    ISIS is gradually starting to play a Russian entertaining game called "The Search for the Fifth Corner."
    1. +5
      5 October 2015 08: 30
      Quote: Barboskin
      ISIS is gradually starting to play a Russian entertaining game called "The Search for the Fifth Corner."


      No dear sir .. the game is called "Carousel" laughing
      1. +5
        5 October 2015 08: 45
        Quote: vorobey
        No dear sir .. the game is called "Carousel"

        "Carousel, carousel, who had time, that pissel. Take a ride on our Carousel" - you truly say
        1. +6
          5 October 2015 08: 57
          Quote: Tusv
          "Carousel, carousel, who had time, that pissel

          Quote: vorobey
          ... the game is called "Carousel"

          In our childhood, the game was "Catch me a brick" The essence of the game in short, who did not have time to dump, received a brick along the ridge laughing
          Here's something similar happening now.
          1. +3
            5 October 2015 09: 13
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            In our childhood, the game was "Catch me with a brick" The essence of the game in short, who did not have time to dump, got a brick along the ridge. Here's something similar is happening now.


            Well, Russian bast shoes also have many different names and varieties - baseball for example ...

            so all these are variants of the same game in essence ..
            1. +1
              5 October 2015 09: 25
              Quote: vorobey

              Well, Russian bast shoes also have many different names and varieties - baseball for example ...

              No Sanya, the game was about a real brick from the nearest building, of which there were many then. Reds were in demand, they were easier and throwing them was easier ..... not everyone managed to get down laughing
              1. +2
                5 October 2015 18: 01
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                . Reds were in demand, they were easier and throwing them was easier ..... not everyone managed to get down


                yes ... moderator with a harsh childhood .. laughing
                1. +1
                  5 October 2015 18: 26
                  Quote: vorobey
                  . moderator with a harsh childhood ..

                  And we played Indians in the country feel With selpo tomahawks wassat There were incidents of suturing stupid recourse
              2. +1
                5 October 2015 18: 01
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                . Reds were in demand, they were easier and throwing them was easier ..... not everyone managed to get down


                yes ... moderator with a harsh childhood .. laughing
      2. +4
        5 October 2015 09: 23
        Quote...
        No dear sir .. the game is called "Carousel" laughing

        Well yes, we remember! wassat
    2. +3
      5 October 2015 08: 48
      More like "Russian Roulette" with a full reel.))) laughing
      1. +2
        5 October 2015 09: 15
        Quote: ivan bogomolov
        More like "Russian Roulette" with a full reel.))

        The boys from Al Nusra play "Russian Roulette" with such pistols ... and you don't need to spin the drum winked
  5. +2
    5 October 2015 08: 28
    Even if they do not bomb it will scare))))))))) laughing
  6. +4
    5 October 2015 08: 29
    In case of success of our efforts, but no other was given, Russia will gain a foothold in this region for a long time ..
  7. +2
    5 October 2015 08: 33
    now if there is anything, it will not be "Desert Storm" from the Yankees ...
  8. +3
    5 October 2015 08: 35
    For so many years the United States has been "saving" the world from ISIS. Ukraine has been "saving" Europe from Russia for 1,5 years. There is something in common in their "nobility"!
    1. +1
      5 October 2015 09: 02
      Quote: Reptiloid
      There is something in common in their "nobility"!

      This is common - management from one interested center.
  9. +5
    5 October 2015 08: 35
    From Putin's speech to the UN General Assembly:

    To begin with, I believe it is extremely important to help restore state structures in Libya, give support to the new Iraqi government, and provide comprehensive assistance to the Syrian government

    It has already begun in Syria. And this is at the end of the list, there is also "to begin with" and "extremely important" is.
    So the Prime Minister of Iraq listened attentively.
    Something Libya is silent.
    1. +2
      5 October 2015 08: 47
      In Libya, you first need to help state structures to restore (build), and they will not be silent.
    2. 0
      5 October 2015 10: 48
      And there are two "states" and both of the former "rebels", the same that our guys are bombing now. They are dumb to ask and scared, suddenly ours and them at the same time will be demolished.
  10. +1
    5 October 2015 08: 38
    Iraqi Prime Minister Heydar al-Abadi said in an interview with Al-Jazeera that the government does not object to attacks by Russian aircraft on militant positions
    This is somehow not serious, like "get-together" men gathered in a bathhouse and decided not to mind with a beer, not "comme il faut", however. In international law, everything is clearly laid down, how and which body of the country asks for help from another country. This is only in " 404 "ministers print decrees on Facebook, but they are happy with each other.
    1. +2
      5 October 2015 08: 44
      Quote: 2224460
      This is somehow not serious, like "get-together" ... In international law, everything is clearly described, how and which body of the country asks for help


      There it says a little further: "
      stressing that "I sent this request to Moscow"
      ".
      A request from the prime minister is no longer a bargain.
      Although, in fact, it is not known what exactly in this request is indicated ...
  11. +1
    5 October 2015 08: 50
    the government does not object to attacks by Russian aviation on the positions of the militants of the “Islamic State”

    This, one might say bluntly, is a slap in the face for the United States for their contribution to the "democratization" of Iraq. In Washington, the leadership, including the military, began to have a nervous tick and pressure increased. Now the whole world will talk about the inability of the United States to solve specific problems. And what will happen next?
  12. +3
    5 October 2015 08: 59
    Quote: Volka
    now if there is anything, it will not be "Desert Storm" from the Yankees ...


    I suggest "Arctic Fox", as an option: "Big Arctic Fox"
  13. +2
    5 October 2015 09: 19
    It seems that asking for Russian help in the form of air raids is becoming contagious or fashionable ...
    ... in this situation, it remains to wait for the North American Indians =) to ask for bombing by terrorist occupants in Washington
  14. +1
    5 October 2015 09: 22
    Lavrov hinted at politeness and here is the result. It is necessary to water on all toilets. But, I think, the mattress will start trading, who will work in what toilets. Market, damn it.
  15. +1
    5 October 2015 09: 47
    If you leave the "abscess" somewhere, the problems with ill health in the world will persist.
    And that means that government forces in Iraq should also be helped.
  16. 0
    5 October 2015 09: 56
    Americans made porridge. It will take a long time to disentangle.
  17. 0
    5 October 2015 10: 05
    Quote: SRC P-15
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    You feel sorry for the bombs.

    I do not mind, because I do not have them! smile Are you sure that we have enough of them to bomb Iraq as well? I understand that they were brought to Syria with a reserve, but they hardly counted on Iraq yet. Maybe now, at this very moment, we are bringing in - and this is the time. So you shouldn't wave a saber ahead of time - "the giraffe is big, he knows better!"

    On the other hand, I think the intensity of the bombing will subside. Because a couple of days more "processing" and ISIS will start scattering through the cracks and the warehouses will be made so small that you will find hell.
  18. 0
    5 October 2015 10: 07
    An official invitation is needed from Iraq. Plus a place of deployment, elaboration of logistics, elaboration of cover and defense. So the thing is not fast.
  19. 0
    5 October 2015 10: 16
    There is one more “good news” in this for our people in the capitalist manner. What we have always put in front of the United States is that our munitions factories are provided with work.
    Put in quotation marks, because the news is double. We are not animals like the USA to enjoy the war and rub our raking hands. But, nevertheless, the economy has a place to be.
  20. +1
    5 October 2015 10: 28
    Iraqi Prime Minister: Baghdad does not object to Russian aviation strikes against militant positions
    Thank you, of course, but an unpleasant surprise awaits us in Iraq: by that time, the Nundos would recover and prepare a trap. While we are not quite strong, our main trump card is surprise. I am sure that the General Staff of the Russian Federation has already thought everything out in this regard.
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. 0
    5 October 2015 12: 28
    Quote: vodolaz
    I wonder where the breakthrough of money that the United States poured into Iraq and its army happened. True, their stability in the region was not at all interesting.

    Half of them were plundered in the United States, half of the rest - in Iraq, and the rest was flushed down the toilet.
  23. 0
    5 October 2015 12: 47
    Well, for starters, you need to finish in Syria and then so that everyone who bombed Russia like that is dumped from Iraq!
  24. +2
    5 October 2015 12: 51
    Quote: duche
    There are a lot of things in Iraq, there were enough of our investments there before the defeat of Gaddafi, a return with interest. Yes drinks


    In fact, Gaddafi was in Libya. Hussein is not confused?
  25. 0
    5 October 2015 14: 12
    the government does not mind the attacks of Russian aviation
    and who needs it? Russia or all the same to Iraq? if iraq, then be so kind as to ask nicely. and only then can this option be considered. Russia may also not object if Iraq shares oil with it.
    1. 0
      5 October 2015 16: 32
      You are mercenary sir .. and without it we just have to be there .. explain for a long time .. if you go to a blunt thing, you’ll cut a chip
  26. -1
    5 October 2015 16: 26
    was teghenan-43- tehran forever tongue
  27. 0
    5 October 2015 21: 39
    Quote: udincev
    Quote: Reptiloid
    There is something in common in their "nobility"!

    This is common - management from one interested center.

    Here's how it turns out: I visited today in one place, then in another and thought - I did not think of it. Yes, indeed, having developed one model, the United States follows it. And when I wrote a comment, I thought about lies, that everything is sewn with white thread - and that: they think no one understands, or vice versa - do not care at all. Sincerely.