Russian Foreign Ministry: Russia will assess the possibility of applying air strikes on positions of ISIL in Iraq, if it receives an official appeal from Baghdad

48
RIA News Today it is disseminating a statement from the Russian Foreign Ministry, which says that if the Iraqi authorities make a formal request to conduct an air operation against ISIL militants, Russia will consider such an appeal. The report says that the Russian Federation, when considering, will take into account the political and military expediency of such measures.

RIA News cite a statement by the Director of the Department for New Challenges and Threats of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, Ilya Rogachev:

Either we will have a corresponding appeal from the government of Iraq, or a resolution of the Security Council, the adoption of which depends crucially on the will of the government of Iraq. If there are such sufficient grounds, both political and military expediency will be assessed.

Recall that on the eve of September 30, the Russian Aerospace Forces began to apply aviation attacks on terrorist positions in Syria. According to the Ministry of Defense, Russian military pilots destroyed the militants' headquarters, a depot with weapons and ammunition, and several military facilities belonging to the so-called Islamic State. With the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, the Syrian army liberated several settlements north of Homs.

Russian Foreign Ministry: Russia will assess the possibility of applying air strikes on positions of ISIL in Iraq, if it receives an official appeal from Baghdad

A map with approximate marks of airstrikes in Syria, published on Twitter.com/Radicalenzyme

In the liberal environment, we already said that at the points marked on the map, "for sure there is no ISIS", but there is a "Syrian free army". I wonder how these gentlemen, lying on their sofas, determine where ISIS is, and where it is not? Or who prompts? ..

And it has literally just become known that the Prime Minister of Iraq, Haider Al-Abadi, stated that although he did not discuss with Vladimir Putin the question of the participation of the Russian Aerospace Forces in the operation against ISIL, he would have welcomed it if Russia had started such an operation.
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +37
    1 October 2015 17: 50
    Oops! Not just that the Federation Council approved the use of the RF Armed Forces not only in Syria, but outside the Russian Federation!
    And then yesterday (Evening with Solovyov) the liberals began to stink: "When the Federation Council began to give permission for the use of the army only in Ukraine! And here What? Putin wants to take over the whole world ??? Aaa? How will the" civilized countries "look at us? ! "
    Dry your snot! Everything goes according to plan!

    More Iraq, Libya! The Afghan Taliban are already on the border with the Tajiks!
    1. +23
      1 October 2015 17: 53
      Baghdad, by the way, may ask, they are not very happy with their democrats there.
      1. +50
        1 October 2015 17: 57
        Iraq then yes, ate democracy.
      2. +5
        1 October 2015 18: 02
        Baghdad, by the way, may ask


        I don't think "Baghdad" is Iraqi. If they ask, we should keep in mind who "put" these rulers there. Why do we need American puppets? (well, if only the interests temporarily coincide. So you also need to remember that it is TEMPORARY)
        1. +6
          1 October 2015 18: 27
          Quote: dauria
          If they ask, we should keep in mind who "put" these rulers there. Why do we need American puppets?
          The goal is ISIS! Well, we remember the second front of the Second World War and Lend Lease. And I think that the leadership of the Russian Federation has no illusions about this hi
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +3
          1 October 2015 18: 46
          dauria
          I don't think "Baghdad" is Iraqi. If they ask, we should keep in mind who "put" these rulers there. Why do we need American puppets? (well, if only the interests coincide temporarily.

          When a bandyuk is grabbed by the throat, it’s not up to the memories of who your boss is! Who put you in a chair ... you think more about how to stay alive ... who will help ...
          And temporary are fellow travelers ..or not ... it's already secondary! The primary thing is that the IS terrorists will have nowhere to hide ... and universal evil will be destroyed! And they’ll hide with their masters in Qatar ... we will find a legitimate opportunity and get them there ..
        4. +1
          1 October 2015 19: 51
          Well, given that the owners of the Baghdad authorities seem to be in the state, but you want to sit on a chair, they may temporarily and do not give a damn about housekeeping orders. And here we can have a thread for them from air raids. Pure commerce. No sentiments, vows of eternal love and friendship. Received an advance - flew in, worked out, flew away - received the remainder. Not even the money itself, but preferences for our companies in Iraq, for example.
        5. 0
          1 October 2015 19: 51
          Well, given that the owners of the Baghdad authorities seem to be in the state, but you want to sit on a chair, they may temporarily and do not give a damn about housekeeping orders. And here we can have a thread for them from air raids. Pure commerce. No sentiments, vows of eternal love and friendship. Received an advance - flew in, worked out, flew away - received the remainder. Not even the money itself, but preferences for our companies in Iraq, for example.
        6. +3
          1 October 2015 20: 28
          Quote: dauria
          Baghdad, by the way, may ask


          I don't think "Baghdad" is Iraqi. If they ask, we should keep in mind who "put" these rulers there. Why do we need American puppets? (well, if only the interests temporarily coincide. So you also need to remember that it is TEMPORARY)


          Can you imagine what amer’s pattern gap will be: Russia is bombing ISIS in Iraq with American money (money in advance).
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +20
      1 October 2015 17: 53
      It would be nice if the CSTO Air Force and BRICS joined, and maybe Egypt and Algeria.

      So, 30 September 2015 missile and bomb strikes were carried out on 8 targets in three provinces for which it was committed 20 sorties. Three regions are absolutely clearly localized - the north of the province of Homs (Rastan and Telbisa), the north of the province of Hama (Kafr Zita and Latamna) and the border of both provinces in the east (east of Salamia).

      The fourth was Idleb province, where government troops suffered a heavy defeat in the summer. Our North Syria (Aveppo, Raqqah, Khasaka Ave.) ours, perhaps, will not touch because the Americans working from the Turkish Incirlik air base dominate here.

      In general, with the forces at the disposal of the Russian contingent, it is hardly possible to act equally effectively throughout Syria. Difficulties can arise when flying over the provinces of Deir ez-Zor and Deraa (Americans, Jordanians, and French fly here). Therefore, the Russian zone of influence is limited to the provinces of Latakia, Hama, Homs, Damascus and, possibly, Idleb (although the Americans did not specifically agree to the latter).

      1 October 2015 Russian aviation has inflicted no less 30 strokes according to the positions of the militants - the Jisr al-Shugur region (Idleb avenue). While the military are doing their job, politicians are doing theirs. Lavrov said that the bombing was "exclusively ISIS facilities," although Jisr al-Shugur is the Islamist Jaysh al-Fatah coalition.

      1. +6
        1 October 2015 18: 16
        Quote: Sith Lord
        although Jisr al-Shugur is the Jaysh al-Fatah Islamist coalition.


        Shaw, you’re playing a bit for a minute here, yet there’s no shame or conscience laughing


        Quote: Sith Lord
        Lavrov said that "only ISIS facilities are being bombed"
      2. +7
        1 October 2015 18: 26
        Judging by the mass of gas emissions from manholes in the underground passages, there were no living. This is called efficiency.
    4. +11
      1 October 2015 17: 54
      The Russian Foreign Ministry, which states that if the Iraqi authorities formally request an air operation against ISIS, Russia will consider such an appeal.

      The Saudis confirmed accuracy ... and Ukraine too .... laughing bully Allah Akbar.... hi
      1. +9
        1 October 2015 18: 47
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Allah Akbar....

        (Having reproached and crossed three times): Truly, akbar, my son! drinks
    5. +6
      1 October 2015 18: 08
      Of course not just like that!
      They have already announced in a liberal environment ...

      Liberators need to be collected and sent to the territory of ISIS, let them be "protected" there!
      1. +3
        1 October 2015 18: 13
        Ours are already there. 01.10.2015/13/52 politikus.ru XNUMX:XNUMX - Russian military experts arrived in Iraq to fight ISIS. Russian intelligence officers arrived in Baghdad to work in the information center to combat ISIS, which will collect intelligence.

        Source: http://politikus.ru/events/59178-01102015-vtoroy-den-voennoy-operacii-rf-v-sirii
        .html
        Politikus.ru
        1. -1
          1 October 2015 18: 27
          What? And in Iraq too? !!! Never mind the news! And pull? The focal point is one thing, and to drive ISIS also in Iraq ... The step is wide, the pants would not break
          1. +7
            1 October 2015 18: 50
            Quote: W L A D
            but to drive ISIS also in Iraq ... The step is wide, the pants would not break


            here the reaction of ISIS fighters is interesting now ... the good news in the desert flies fast and the bad news even faster ...
      2. +9
        1 October 2015 18: 31
        Quote: Skif83
        Liberators need to be collected and sent to the territory of ISIS, let them be "protected" there!

        no, my friend, the liberals must be disavowed precisely in their own country, in Russia, for it is here that they most of all crap and poison the air. they won’t go to igil, they’ll go straight to the yesh, we are working with you, and they are already with money grants from the State Department, but in general you are right, off the bastards. do not like Russia? -Well b..b on ... th from my country, what would you not stink here.
    6. 0
      2 October 2015 03: 21
      Kakly already shrink from understatement.
  2. jjj
    +8
    1 October 2015 17: 50
    As you can see, the development of events was not long in coming
    1. +2
      1 October 2015 17: 54
      Quote: jjj
      As you can see, the development of events was not long in coming

      Could it be that the Arabs can’t be trusted, they won’t be able to take off. I would love to see Chinese flyers or land explorers, and they are in no hurry to help. It seems like allies at the moment.
  3. +13
    1 October 2015 17: 53
    If this happens (the request of the Government of Iraq), it will be the most sonorous slap on the mattress of this century, after September 11th. I would have deserved it. But hardly. There will be a bust.
  4. -1
    1 October 2015 17: 56
    Something seems to me that the US puppets in Iraq will not ask for Russian help.
    1. +9
      1 October 2015 17: 59
      Quote: Walk
      Something seems to me that the US puppets in Iraq will not ask for Russian help.

      the Center was already opened there, where representatives of the General Staff of four countries exchange information and plan strikes.
      1. +4
        1 October 2015 18: 33
        Quote: Sith Lord
        I plan blows.

        Freudian reservation. laughing I would be happy for you!
    2. +5
      1 October 2015 18: 04
      Here is the last paragraph

      "And literally it just became known that Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said that although he did not discuss with Vladimir Putin the issue of the participation of the Russian Aerospace Forces in the operation against ISIS, but would welcomeif Russia started such an operation. "
      1. 0
        1 October 2015 20: 23
        Quote: Tatarus
        Here is the last paragraph

        Many people comment simply without reading it plainly ... here it is often, but to blurt out and "+" to earn.
        1. 0
          1 October 2015 22: 39
          It was the same in Syria. First, someone blurted out something. Three days began to bombard the tortoise.
    3. +2
      1 October 2015 18: 27
      It's hard to say, but the Foreign Ministry just doesn’t make such statements ...
    4. 0
      1 October 2015 22: 37
      I think in the near future they will ask. Iraq said it could ask, Russia replied that if asked, it would help. It was the same with Syria. At the beginning, they voiced the possibility that they might ask ...
  5. +2
    1 October 2015 17: 56
    Syria, Iraq ... Then what is Libya? There really is no legitimate government. We will see.
  6. +4
    1 October 2015 17: 57
    Permission is almost there.
    October 2015 CNN
    CNN: Iraqi Prime Minister invited Russia to help with the terrorists and him:
    After a series of airstrikes that Russia inflicted on the positions of the Islamic State in Syria, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said that Baghdad would welcome any help on its territory, CNN reports. In fact, the politician invites Russia, the channel’s correspondent notes.
    And do not forget about the Anti-Terrorism Information Center created in Iraq.
  7. +2
    1 October 2015 17: 58
    The first pancake with a bun, if so))
  8. +4
    1 October 2015 17: 58
    Harnessed so harnessed. Not just a troika of trotters, but some kind of express train. Does it seem that there are specific intentions to move the United States, or a slight trolling of our "partners"? Events are developing rapidly.
  9. +3
    1 October 2015 18: 00
    ISIS needs to be beaten on all fronts.
  10. +2
    1 October 2015 18: 01
    Quote: Ribald
    In fact, the politician invites Russia, the channel’s correspondent notes.

    We need an official request from the Iraqi side.
  11. +11
    1 October 2015 18: 03
    statement by the Russian Foreign Ministry, which states that if the Iraqi authorities formally request an air operation against ISIS, Russia will consider such an appeal. It'll be cool. We have another base and the whole world striped mixed with guano. The invaders can’t do anything, but we said we came to protect you. You can understand the Iraqis. They understand that ISIS squeezed out of Syria will go to them in full force. There is only one thing left, to spit on the advisers of the invaders and make the right decision. Will they be able (that is, will) allow them.
    1. +3
      1 October 2015 18: 44
      But then Turkey gets in, which Erdogan certainly does not count on. We will see.
  12. +7
    1 October 2015 18: 06
    It is high time to put all these liberal sofa "experts" categorically broadcasting about what they have no idea about. The air will be cleaner. Oh, sorry there is no comrade Stalin ...
  13. +10
    1 October 2015 18: 16
    Sobitiya is going so swiftly that it’s only time to turn around. Americans, having made an acidic family, are yelling that they aren’t bombing like the Kelos in Go.v. but they have left their pants full of panic. A slap in the face, but if it’s not worth chasing after 2 rabbits.
    1. +5
      1 October 2015 18: 30
      What are two hares? One region, one adversary, one operation.
  14. +2
    1 October 2015 18: 21
    I would not be in a hurry to immediately enter Iraq. For a start, we need to analyze the departures that have already taken place and make corrections.
  15. +2
    1 October 2015 18: 25
    There is no sense from liberalists. One stink for any reason.
    His business trip to the Middle East
  16. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 29
    Especially for the respected author, who apparently doubts the intellectual abilities of the people around him, there are maps with the positions of the free Syrian army and ISIS. An example of one of these cards: http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/869/iyqr662.jpg
    For me, it’s even good that they’re bombing the SSA’s positions; they are much more dangerous for Assad’s troops than ISIS at the moment.
    1. +4
      1 October 2015 18: 54
      judging by the map, the situation is bad ... so far
      1. +1
        1 October 2015 22: 37
        Quote: Makarov
        judging by the map, the situation is bad ... so far

        Almost a third of the country is a desert, in the captured part of the country the entire industrial structure and population are located along the Efrat, Khabur River. Another part of almost 20% is not controlled at all.
        The situation is certainly sad, but not critical.
        I think that when they start to seriously press ISIS our "partners" will start helping them with weapons and information.
        1. 0
          2 October 2015 10: 14
          Well, you, my friend, if there was a critical situation, I would say so - well ... well, and so the RF arrived in time ...
  17. -1
    1 October 2015 18: 29
    How enraged are these "Recall .....". They talk for a day, they also remind me. News is two lines, but reminders are 22nd.
  18. +5
    1 October 2015 18: 44
    Either we will have a corresponding appeal from the government of Iraq, or a resolution of the Security Council, the adoption of which depends crucially on the will of the government of Iraq. If there are such sufficient grounds, both political and military expediency will be assessed.


    I would like to draw the attention of colleagues who advocate "exporting our participation" to the "last sea" to one important aspect, namely the economic component. We need to soberly assess our financial capabilities, and no matter how tempting the desire to solve everything in one fell swoop, we must calculate everything very carefully.
    And the armies of Iraq and Syria have cardinal differences, which is no less important.

    Well, that's the type of opinion. Yes hi
    1. +3
      1 October 2015 19: 19
      Your concern is clear We need to soberly assess our financial capabilities., along with this, ISIS trawls oil for 20 bucks, on the world markets because of this, prices fall dramatically (it buys at bargain prices through dummies Merika. Russia, due to these prices, is losing revenue, including to the budget. The control of this region guarantees the equalization of prices with all the consequences ...... States lose everything !!!
      1. +2
        1 October 2015 19: 38
        Quote: dima-fesko
        Your concern is understandable. It is necessary to soberly assess our financial capabilities, along with this, ISIS trawls oil for 20 bucks, on the world markets prices drop off because of this (buying up Merick at bargain prices. Russia is losing revenue because of these prices, including in the budget .. The control of this region guarantees the alignment of prices with all the consequences ...... States lose everything !!!

        Dima, yes, no doubt. You are right, but these will be the results. (God forbid!) We are now, far from in the most prosperous financial condition.

        This is how it is. hi
  19. +10
    1 October 2015 18: 47
    Who, when and by what state defined the legal concept and existence of a certain "Syrian Free Army"? On behalf of which state does it speak, who is its authorized representative, who represents it officially, what is the composition of its bodies and how do they comply with the norms of international law?
    One of the branches of the rebel terrorists, but under the leadership of the United States! And it is not a fact that it is the United States, through intermediaries in the region, that will not begin to supply them with air defense systems.
  20. +1
    1 October 2015 19: 03
    If Russia knocks Igil out of the oil producing regions, the price of oil will creep up, as the s and their allies, the Britons, will not be able to enrich themselves at the expense of free oil. Bucks days will be numbered. That's what the Anglo-Saxons are afraid of, that's what panic is about.
  21. +2
    1 October 2015 19: 39
    Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said disappointed with US support in the fight against the Islamic State.

    http://rusvesna.su/news/1443712884

  22. +2
    1 October 2015 19: 57
    Comrades, the state of the Syrian and Iraqi armies should be taken into account. If the Syrians are ready to fight to the last and have already demonstrated this repeatedly, then the situation with the Iraqis is still more deplorable. The control structure is virtually absent, there are no normal units either, the situation with weapons is also not so hot. Here at least the Syrians on earth are clearing everything, but in Iraq, who will be clearing?
  23. 0
    1 October 2015 20: 11
    RIA Novosti cites a statement by the Director of the Department for New Challenges and Threats of the Russian Foreign Ministry Ilya Rogachev:

    Either we will have a corresponding appeal from the government of Iraq, or a resolution of the Security Council, the adoption of which depends crucially on the will of the government of Iraq. If there are such sufficient grounds, both political and military expediency will be assessed.
    And that's okay. Piping hot. well, so as not to relax "partners" laughing
  24. 0
    1 October 2015 22: 21
    Iraq has its own good Air Force, including modern Mi-28NE, Mi-35M, F-16 ... But if they ask for help, we will help
  25. 0
    2 October 2015 12: 37
    Said by our one important thing. Until Iraq officially, formally asks, we will simply observe and discuss. That would not be in the future statements about the treacherous invasions of our air forces and unreasonable bombing. And the official invitation will be. For soon ISIS will begin to spread from Syria to neighboring territories. And if you don’t begin to pinch him there, then it will be bad for everyone. The fact that America and the European coalition stands for contacts with us is purely in order to remove ISIS from under our attacks in advance. So it’s worthwhile to warn when the planes started bombing.