Automated electronic jamming complex "Resident" ZVO suppressed UAV during the exercise "Union-2015 Shield"

13
The head of the press service of the Western Military District, Colonel Oleg Kochetkov said in an interview with Interfax-AVN that the electronic warfare units (EW) of the district successfully suppressed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) of the conditional enemy using the Zhitel radio automated jamming complex during the second stage joint operational maneuvers "Union Shield-2015".



“According to the plan of the exercise stage, the conditional enemy used unmanned aerial vehicles for reconnaissance of the advancing units of the regional grouping of troops of the Union State and determining the direction of the main attack of the troops. The “Resident” jamming stations determined the frequencies of control and information transfer of the UAV of the conditional enemy, and broke off the communication channels by setting up radio interference, ”the Military Industrial Courier quotes him.

Kochetkov emphasized that the unit’s military personnel had to carry out the assigned tasks in rather difficult air conditions, while creating interferences, the operators should not interfere with the actions of our UAVs and aviation.

According to him, the observers present at the test site evaluated the actions of the EW military personnel as successful. The practical actions stipulated by the program of the second stage of the exercises “Union-2015 Shield” are being worked out simultaneously on the territory of three military ranges in the north-western regions of the Russian Federation.

In total, over 8 thousand people participate in maneuvers, as well as about 400 units of various military and special equipment, including about 100 tanks and 80 aircraft for various purposes. The exercises will last until September 16, 2015.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    15 September 2015 05: 42
    Eh ... Good technique! All so green and beautiful. Let the adversaries scratch their turnips.
    1. +1
      15 September 2015 06: 24
      Our EW tools are the best in the world, no doubt !!!
      1. +6
        15 September 2015 06: 39
        .... no, not yours, but ours !!!! wink
    2. +3
      15 September 2015 06: 31
      Here is the news from the exercises “Shield of the Union-2015” good
      And then some are not in bite and complain that the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation do not have joint exercises.
      And I say that:
      The exercises are held constantly, the last 15 years, starting in 2001. General republican (including with the participation of the Russian military) in the fall, September-October, depending on the year.
      At the Ashuluk firing range, our air defense also conduct firing in conjunction with the Russian military, probably in general since 1998.
      Now (in 2015) they are only being completed or have already been completed, there was a story on news from the Republic of Belarus that there were about 400 military personnel.
      In the Pskov region they have just begun, about 1300 military personnel (officers, warrant officers, soldiers) are participating from the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus
    3. 0
      15 September 2015 08: 48
      Now the "residents" of Russia will be able to intercept drones.
  2. +2
    15 September 2015 05: 46
    This is another argument in favor of efficiency and low cost ...
    And yet they do work !!! fellow
  3. +6
    15 September 2015 06: 00
    This is how much we still do not know ... Well, and the "target" induction missile defense system for the protection of helicopters, fighters and tanks. And medium-range EM weapons, capable of extinguishing UAVs from a distance of "Sosny" or initiating warheads of the KR. And compact EMBCs based on cesium iodide in a standing magnet, which Westerners cannot do, not knowing how to defeat breakdown at high power. They make huge 907 kg of boNba on a "standing wave" with a radius of 150 m, when the weight and size characteristics of a standard Onyx warhead, if our scheme is inserted there, will suffice for an 800 m radius ... , special communications and the banking system of, say, little Israel, and take out the warheads, since the Jews say they have no nuclear weapons.
    And, most importantly, carried away by geolocation, potential friends hit a bolt on normal GOS - IK, RL, sprite infrared optics operating at long range. Leaving this, at best, ATGMs (well, RVV and SAM - by itself). And in the conditions of jamming satellites, and only on missiles in case of a conventional war, only our missiles will fly at point-moving targets.
    Know passive partners and are afraid.
  4. -2
    15 September 2015 06: 38
    an unfinished UAV was left to go into autonomous mode, to detect the source of interference, the good thing was most likely not far away and to launch a missile strike on it :-) Well, this is just a matter of the near future
  5. 0
    15 September 2015 07: 33
    And the name is what !!! RESIDENT laughing
    Who comes up with an interesting name)))? "Flower" flower bed in the artillery has long become a byword, where in the army do not look everywhere interesting names! wink
  6. -3
    15 September 2015 07: 35
    Interference stations "Resident", determined the frequency of control and transmission of information of the UAV of a conditional enemy, and broke the communication channels by interfering with radio interference, "the Military Industrial Courier quoted him as saying.

    HREF? wink

    Kochetkov stressed that the unit’s servicemen had to perform assigned tasks in rather difficult conditions of the air situation, while creating interference, the operators should not interfere with the actions of our UAVs and aviation.

    No, not an MFC. During the hostilities, the enemy will not make such indulgences and stupidly broadcast on the same frequency. There will be frequency hopping and even with an antenna with a controlled radiation pattern. Try drowning it.
    1. +4
      15 September 2015 08: 25
      Quote: professor
      Yes, even with an antenna with a controlled radiation pattern. Try drowning it.


      The jamming station does not jam the antenna ..... it itself puts the directional sheet of the radio interference beam diagram on the UAV, overloading and drowning out its receiving path, and the interference frequency stupidly repeats from the frequency at which the UAVs are trying to control .... Change, do not change ...
      Plus surprises that are not mentioned here, i.e. after drowning out the main channel, an attempt is made to intercept control at reserve frequencies, to which UAVs are switched automatically, having detected interference on the main ....
      1. 0
        15 September 2015 10: 17
        Quote: RusDV
        The jamming station does not jam the antenna ..... it itself puts the directional sheet of the radio interference beam diagram on the UAV, overloading and drowning out its receiving path, and the interference frequency stupidly repeats from the frequency at which the UAVs are trying to control .... Change, do not change ...

        Seriously? It's like if I look through binoculars, and you blind me at the back of my head with a flashlight. Where is the jamming station located? Where is the drone? And where is the Dronov antenna pointed? wink



        Quote: RusDV
        Plus surprises that are not mentioned here, i.e. after drowning out the main channel, an attempt is made to intercept control at reserve frequencies, to which UAVs are switched automatically, having detected interference on the main ....

        What are the backup frequencies for frequency hopping? What are you talking about? request
        1. +1
          15 September 2015 21: 40
          well, you’re just like a sickle in patriotism, it’s impossible to stifle subtle spiritual matters with technical facts laughing
  7. 0
    15 September 2015 16: 51
    I would like to wish only one thing: more electronic warfare equipment in the troops. Thanks to our designers and staff operating this technique for your work!