On the RAE-2015 presented reconnaissance "Lynx"

At the Nizhny Tagil exhibition presented military reconnaissance machine "Lynx", created by the Rubtsovsk branch of "Uralvagonzavod", says the agency Messenger of Mordovia.


On the RAE-2015 presented reconnaissance "Lynx"


"BRM" Lynx "is designed to conduct military intelligence as part of special units. Thermal imaging and radar equipment allows the crew of the vehicle at any time of the year and day, in conditions of limited optical visibility, to monitor the terrain, to search and detect various targets, including camouflaged and moving objects, ”the material at the exhibition says.

The thermal imager is able to see at night on 3 km, radar detects people at a distance of up to 4 km, and technology - up to 10-12 km.

The machine has “navigation and orientation equipment, electronic computer for information processing, communication facilities and data transmission”. On board there is also a hardware for classifying speech and digital information.

The crew consists of: “the commander of the reconnaissance, the commander of the machine, the operator-gunner, the navigator, the computer, the mechanic-driver, the wireless telegraph operator” - the whole 6 man.



It is reported that the BRM "has an 450 horsepower engine, the maximum speed on the highway is 70 km / h, the speed afloat is 10 km / h, the cruising range on the highway is 600 km, armament: 2-72 automatic gun mm, PKT machine gun 30 mm, gun ammunition - 7,62 shots. " The total combat weight of the vehicle is about 500 tons. In the case there are two loopholes for firing from small weapons.

“Despite the fact that BRM was created back in the 90-s, it still has quite high tactical and technical characteristics and may be of interest to foreign customers,” concludes the publication.

Photos used:
http://vestnik-rm.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Stalker.1977 14 September 2015 12: 37 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    Whatever the day, the premieres, joyfully become on the soul.
    1. Truth 14 September 2015 12: 45 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      NATA is getting out, showing how many people might trample on the beast against us, but we show from which we will mow this crowd.
      1. ASK505 14 September 2015 13: 18 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9
        Quote: Truth
        can lope against a nation against us,

        Victor, how many classes do you have behind you? There are no such words in the Russian language: "lope", "trample". Read more and write less. Do not embarrass yourself.
    2. Now we are free 14 September 2015 12: 47 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The car is not bad, but I personally would like to see the "Stalker" as a BRM in the Russian army (See photo)
      Although this machine has two significant obstacles:
      1) BRM "Lynx" has a very large unification with BMP-3, and it (BMP-3) is likely to be the main BMP of the Russian army before the arrival of Kurganets.
      2) "Stalker" the brainchild of the Union, but the Belarusian military-industrial complex and not Russian sad which may complicate its stream production and operation, especially in the light of global import substitution.
      1. PAM
        PAM 14 September 2015 14: 04 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        "Stalker" does not swim, so the role of a scout in our high-water expanses is doubtful.
      2. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 15: 12 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Now we are free
        The car is not bad, but I personally would like to see the Stalker as a BRM in the Russian army


        Dear Iskander, and share, if it does not complicate, from what motives and, accordingly, tactical and technical characteristics, you recommend having this type of equipment in the intelligence units of the RF Armed Forces as a combat reconnaissance vehicle.
      3. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 16: 04 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Now we are free
        The car is not bad, but I personally would like to see the Stalker as a BRM in the Russian army


        No, Iskander, it’s not at all suitable for reconnaissance, the caliber of the guns is weak and all kinds of missiles are not enough. You won’t go with such intelligence.

        Of course, I'm sorry for the sarcasm, but when I asked you to explain your point of view, I saw two deleted comments. If it’s interesting, for almost six years he commanded a detailed reconnaissance, hence the question arose, because the machine is not adapted to intelligence absolutely.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. lukke 14 September 2015 12: 48 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      BRM-3 "Lynx" was first introduced ten years ago, also to me the premiere)
      1. NEXUS 14 September 2015 17: 36 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: lukke
        BRM-3 "Lynx" was first introduced ten years ago, also to me the premiere)

        Interestingly, will there be a reconnaissance vehicle from the Kurganets, Boomerang or Armata families? ... and preferably with an uninhabited tower. hi
    6. War and Peace 14 September 2015 12: 50 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Mo cannot live without a lynx ...
    7. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 15: 35 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Stalker.1977
      Whatever the day, the premieres, joyfully become on the soul.


      Andrey, unfortunately I will upset you. The car is old, the beginning of development was the end of the 80s, it was adopted in my opinion (I don’t know this for sure) in 93-95. But this is not the most important thing, the base of the car is good and the timing is not so important.
      But with the "stuffing" there is trouble. In the mid-80s, I had a BRM and BRM-1k in my company, the first one in the role of the radar was the SBR-3 station, on the second PSNR-5 and now we are looking at the article

      The radar detects people at a distance of 4 km, and equipment - up to 10-12 km.


      the data to become completely coincide with the data of PSNR-5, and a little better for a person than SBR-3.
      I will not even consider the rest, a person who has not encountered will not be interested. Just for only one type of reconnaissance equipment, which is very important for the BRM, by the way, I can tell you that this "premiere" in my heart is not joyful.
      For information: for exercises and other serious events they took a car from artillerymen in a platoon of the artillery division control, so the name came out of my head.
      PS For the sake of objectivity, judging by the second photo, the range finder and thermal imaging device are better than in the 80s.
      1. GRAY 14 September 2015 15: 47 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Vladimir 1964
        a thermal imaging device is better than in the 80s.

        On the BRM and BRM-1k it was not at all.
        1. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 16: 19 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: GRAY
          On the BRM and BRM-1k it was not at all.


          Sergey, and I won’t argue, of course it wasn’t. I saw this on this one. I had a portable night vision device, I don’t remember the name, healthy, heavy and useless. But LPR-1, I already had portable ones, as many as 2 pieces. On the radar fixated.
          Like that.
          Thanks for the comment, it’s always nice to talk to a knowledgeable colleague.
          1. GRAY 14 September 2015 17: 01 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Vladimir 1964
            On the radar fixated.

            completely coincide with the data of PSNR-5,

            On the "Lynx" and this is, well, maybe a little doped, so the characteristics and the same.
            1. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 22: 35 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: GRAY
              On the "Lynx" and this is, well, maybe a little doped, so the characteristics and the same.


              Sergey, therefore, I did not understand the situation with the showing of the “new” BRM. Judging by your comments, remember how the PSRD worked. In my company, two people knew what a "strobe" was (a platoon commander - Kiev VOKU and a student as a radio telegraphist (expelled from the Kiev Civil Aviation Institute), but only a student could really use it. And now I’m supposedly presented with a new machine with equipment from “the pea king” "and I read comments like
              Krasava, we are waiting for the series.


              PS I don’t know, remember, but the ERRS device was also included in the kit. Was it also interesting to install it on the latest machine?
  2. vovanpain 14 September 2015 12: 43 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Krasava, we are waiting for the series.
    1. GRAY 14 September 2015 14: 50 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: vovanpain
      Krasava, we are waiting for the series.

      In 1995, adopted by the Armed Forces of Russia.
  3. DIVAN SOLDIER 14 September 2015 12: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Hmm straight "new."
  4. Watchdog 14 September 2015 12: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Sandy camouflage theme repeat
  5. Corsair0304 14 September 2015 12: 47 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The BMP-3 is very similar, only without a 100 mm gun. Unification is a great thing.
    1. woron333444 14 September 2015 12: 51 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      base with BMP-3 one
  6. Sergey Vladimirovich 14 September 2015 12: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “Despite the fact that the BRM was created back in the 90s, it still has quite high tactical and technical characteristics and may be interesting to foreign customers”

    From this we must conclude that this machine is not provided for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation? In the 90s there were no funds, and now is morally old? Well, provided that for the native "invincible and legendary" there is a newer version of the BRM, with better characteristics and, it would be nice, on some unified platform (such as "Armata", as an example), then you can be glad for the developers - work and the efforts of the 90s will begin to bear fruit.
    1. olega 14 September 2015 13: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I wonder whose electronics on it?
      From whose components?
      Whose elemental base?
      1. GRAY 14 September 2015 15: 05 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: olega
        I wonder whose electronics on it?
        From whose components?
        Whose elemental base?

        There is no time to look now, but in terms of composition there is what:
        Radar reconnaissance of moving ground targets 1RL133-1 "Credo-M"
        Horizontal viewing angles - sector 240 degrees
        Radar lift height on the boom - 1 m
        It is possible to install on a tripod at a distance of up to 20 m from the BRM-3K

        Day and night observation devices:
        - 1PN61 "Pecheneg" - active-pulse monitoring device, passive observation, observation with laser illumination, determining the range to the target;
        - 1PN71 "Manual-2" - thermal imaging monitoring device;

        Laser rangefinder 1D14 "Fauna", located in a rotating dome. Viewing angles horizontally - sector 60 degrees.

        Radiation and chemical reconnaissance device PRHR.
        Military chemical reconnaissance device VPHR.

        Navigation equipment:

        Navigation equipment TNA-4-6.
        On-board computer 1V520.
        Semi-automatic gyrocompass 1G50 with a sensitive element on a magnetic suspension.
        Surveying information is digitally issued.
        Coordinator 11129.
        Duplicate tools - orientation sight and tower reading devices.
    2. KBR109 14 September 2015 13: 02 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Intelligence machine on the ARM platform? You think before speaking. negative
  7. olega 14 September 2015 12: 55 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Quote: Truth
    NATA is getting out, showing how many people might trample on the beast against us, but we show from which we will mow this crowd.

    They showed you a single copy, and you think that our entire Army has already been stuffed with them and the soldiers have been trained ...
    Well do not make me laugh !!!
    If the production of all the new products that are shown by quilted jackets at the exhibitions loads our remaining plants, then their capacities for mass production will simply not be enough, even if they work in 3 shifts.
    Previously, it was necessary to take care of the rearmament of the Army, and not when Serdyukov pokramsil Army and our defense industry was blown away.
    Road spoon for dinner ...
  8. olega 14 September 2015 12: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It was created back in the 90s ...
    Well ... most likely the development started back in the Union ...
    That's the same everywhere ... no matter how the "market reformers" of the Union and its economy have been scolding, for the time being we are strenuously suppressing the inheritance inherited from the Soviet Authority, THANKS a lot more for it, that by inertia, due to the energy of its momentum, we can at least to roll and not be ashamed in front of the World.
  9. erased 14 September 2015 12: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The car is far from new. Although good. But now it is worth doing BRM on the basis of Kurganets. In order to unify the middle class infantry with the main combat vehicle. The T-15 is too heavy for reconnaissance.
  10. Old26 14 September 2015 13: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    Krasava, we are waiting for the series.

    Pancake. The car has been in service for 20 years. What the hell is the "performance" at the exhibition
  11. VohaAhov 14 September 2015 13: 04 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Stalker.1977
    Whatever the day, the premieres, joyfully become on the soul.

    As for the "premiere," I would not argue. The machine was adopted by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in the distant 1995. It is possible that it was modernized, only then it can be called a novelty.
  12. over 14 September 2015 13: 11 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    I want that. For fishing and hunting and to drive to the country laughing
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. roskot 14 September 2015 13: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    BRM was created back in the 90s, it still has quite high tactical and technical characteristics and may be of interest to foreign customers ”,

    Apparently she was put up that it might be of interest to foreign customers.
  15. Izotovp 14 September 2015 14: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Judging by the instruments, the observations were modernized. The base is good, enough monitoring devices, communications and computing power to upgrade. But the location of the antenna on the front bevel is embarrassing, cut it off with your own fire from a machine gun or gun.
  16. shtraib 14 September 2015 14: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Again slanting 2a72, how much can you stumble over this rake.
    1. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 15: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: shtraib
      Again slanting 2a72, how much can you stumble over this rake.


      Artyom, and what’s “oblique” in her. With the use of thermal processing, they verified it, and if you didn’t shoot down bushes and canopies with the barrel, then in the short burst mode (no more than 5-7 shots) per kilometer, the tank puts all shells (BT) with a dispersion circle of 50 cm radius in the target. It’s enough .
      So that's it.
      1. shtraib 14 September 2015 17: 16 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Watch the shooting with the BTR-82 as she puts

        1. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 19: 09 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: shtraib
          Watch the shooting with the BTR-82 as she puts

          Artem, as I understand the answer for me. Well, let's argue.
          The article about the BRM, the tracked vehicle, respectively, with a wider base, with a higher mass and the most interesting thing is the torsion bar suspension, which does not swing the short burst of the 30-mm gun (and that the burst is short, I clearly argued in the previous comment). Now the BTR, all indicators related to the BMP, it (BTR) is lower, plus a softer suspension and a high center of gravity. And practice shows that the BTR-70 even reveals KPVT in long bursts.
          So I think your claim to accuracy 2A72 is not entirely objective, because it’s tactless to compare different types of weapons.
          1. shtraib 14 September 2015 22: 22 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Exactly the case in the platform? The module doesn’t move on the video, but the barrel is sausage in all directions
            1. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 23: 34 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: shtraib
              Exactly the case in the platform? The module doesn’t move on the video, but the barrel is sausage in all directions


              Artem, well, look, the barrel is sausage after the projectile leaves the barrel, and very slightly, the rate of fire is the lowest. At this pace, I think that with APCs you can achieve good accuracy.
              I didn’t find the BTR-82A, so I can only assume based on the operating experience of 70 and 80. But I am well acquainted with the BMP-2, I served 6 years directly on them. That's why I got hooked with you that I had no problems with this gun, I mean accuracy.
              Here it is like that.
              1. shtraib 15 September 2015 13: 07 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Visually, the next shot is fired before the barrel oscillation ends.
                The BMP-2 is 2a42, which differs significantly from this. By the way, there are no questions to her.
  17. Zomanus 14 September 2015 15: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The machine is purely for reconnaissance and target designation. The weapon, as I understand it, is purely for self-defense and is used as a last resort. The most important thing here is the peepers, which allow you to detect the target and aim more powerful things at it.
    1. Vladimir 1964 14 September 2015 15: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Zomanus
      The machine is purely for reconnaissance and target designation. The weapon, as I understand it, is purely for self-defense and is used as a last resort.


      Think correctly, Alex, correctly.
  18. Zaurbek 14 September 2015 15: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    For 2A42, the tower must be changed, probably. And she is not released. Or another in diameter.
  19. wild weld 14 September 2015 16: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But is it needed now? It’s not easier to hang equipment on BMP3
  20. ingenera 14 September 2015 17: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Judging by the speed afloat, water cannons? Such an “iron” cannot be dispersed by rewinding tracks up to 10 km / h.
  21. van zai 14 September 2015 23: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Stalker.1977
    Whatever the day, the premieres, joyfully become on the soul.

    I read koment and ... fell. My friend! Yes, this is a technique of the times of the USSR, and every little person interested in military equipment knows about it. So google to help you, go in for self-education, and do not smack nonsense the next time. Regards to the community.