Military Review

Ministry of Defense: climate weapons do not exist

45
Create and use globally climatic weapon impossible, said Vladimir Udrish, head of the hydrometeorological service of the Russian Armed Forces. He writes about it Rossiyskaya Gazeta.




"World experience shows that the global nature of the impact is impossible, since it requires very high energy and costs." On a global scale, this is impossible. "- said Udrish.

But a local effect on the weather is possible. In particular, military meteorologists "are capable of causing hail or avalanches," he noted.

“We actively used this while ensuring security during the Olympic Games in Sochi. There, for example, avalanches were made, ”the head of the service said.

“Talk about the fact that Russia has and is actively using climate weapons, has been going on for a long time. For example, when in February this year, unprecedented snowfalls and severe frosts fell on the northeastern states of the United States three times, the CIA hurried to suspect Russia that it brought down bad weather on America, using the "secret climate weapon", the newspaper writes.

Meanwhile, the CIA itself is engaged in such developments, although the amount of funding is kept secret. According to Russian experts, the work of the CIA and the Pentagon in this direction is carried out according to closed budget items.

“The project involves the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, the Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and NASA. In particular, we are talking about limiting the flow of sunlight to the Earth by spraying special particles in the stratosphere, managing solar radiation and moving clouds, ”explains the publication.

“In case of successful completion of these research works and the creation of climate weapons, the main tasks for it can be the economic destabilization of certain countries through provoking large-scale droughts or monsoon rains and tornadoes. Such natural disasters can cause anti-government protests and even regime change. ”, - says famous Russian expert Igor Korotchenko.

The WG recalls that the UN resolution of 1977 prohibits "the use of environmental change technologies for hostile purposes." The United States ratified the relevant international treaty in 1978.

Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. valday
    valday 31 August 2015 11: 10 New
    +14
    Today global application is impossible, and tomorrow it will be possible. Technology does not stand still. And climate weapons will be the most effective weapons of the future.
    1. Now we are free
      Now we are free 31 August 2015 11: 48 New
      +3
      Ministry of Defense: climate weapons do not exist
      And right there: But a local effect on the weather is possible. In particular, military meteorologists "are capable of causing hail or avalanches," he noted.

      Well, the Gakona training ground in Alaska is also just for calling hail or for avalanches ...

      (Photo "Clickable")
    2. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 31 August 2015 11: 55 New
      +6
      Quote: valday
      Today global application is impossible, and tomorrow it will be possible. Technology does not stand still. And climate weapons will be the most effective weapons of the future.


      The devil is simply trying to convince everyone that he does not exist. I do not believe, for example, that in Syria it was very successful for several years of drought, and then suddenly the armed opposition appeared and at the same time, the Hilary yelled that Assad must be abruptly removed. That is, we are fooled, but in the meantime, some people are working quite calmly with climate change technology.
    3. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 31 August 2015 11: 57 New
      +2
      Zhirinovsky does not agree ...... laughing
    4. maxxdesign
      maxxdesign 31 August 2015 13: 45 New
      +1
      climate weapons will be the end of our whole ball! You can create a super-weapon, but subjugate and control this climate weapon - lie!
  2. andrei332809
    andrei332809 31 August 2015 11: 11 New
    +30
    how does it not exist? are they there in the Moscow region, do not watch ren-tv? bully
    1. BMP-2
      BMP-2 31 August 2015 11: 20 New
      +13
      I recalled: a case told by Molotov. Stalin once asked one of the leaders of the weather service what their accuracy of forecasts was. He, cautious and not wanting to look like a bouncer, said: -Honestly, it is small, Comrade Stalin. Based on the testimony of existing instruments and our experience, only 40%. Then Stalin, thinking, said: -And vi (a feature of Stalin’s pronunciation) say the opposite, then the accuracy will be 60%!

      It seems that nothing has changed in 70 years ...
      1. WKS
        WKS 31 August 2015 11: 28 New
        +4
        And who is burning forests around Baikal now?
        1. BMP-2
          BMP-2 31 August 2015 11: 49 New
          +2
          Meteorologists?
        2. 020205
          020205 31 August 2015 12: 08 New
          +3
          Yeah american intelligence laughing Our swindler burns everything out there, they will forbid us to accept fires when the scorched forest ends
          1. alexng
            alexng 31 August 2015 12: 16 New
            +1
            Empty water bottles are the main arsonist of forests. Personally, I saw in 1979 (there were such huge fires) as grass ignites from a bottle.
      2. Ze Kot
        Ze Kot 31 August 2015 23: 28 New
        0
        Quote: BMP-2
        I recalled: a case told by Molotov. Stalin once asked one of the leaders of the weather service what their accuracy of forecasts was. He, cautious and not wanting to look like a bouncer, said: -Honestly, it is small, Comrade Stalin. Based on the testimony of existing instruments and our experience, only 40%. Then Stalin, thinking, said: -And vi (a feature of Stalin’s pronunciation) say the opposite, then the accuracy will be 60%!

        It seems that nothing has changed in 70 years ...


        Now they cannot guess at all. And it would seem, 50 to 50 ... And still by.
  3. RuslanNN
    RuslanNN 31 August 2015 11: 17 New
    +15
    Does not exist. If by chance a tornado rinses off half of America, we are out of business!
    1. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer 31 August 2015 11: 55 New
      +2
      And why is it suddenly a similar article? Those. if in the near future partners will have natural disasters, then Lavrov will send them to read VO - they said that we had nothing to do with it!
      Yes, in all five disasters. Or six? Shoigu needs to be clarified ...
  4. gudgeon
    gudgeon 31 August 2015 11: 19 New
    +13
    World experience shows that global impacts are impossible, because it requires very high energies, costs. "On a global scale, this is impossible

    “AC games are a waste of time. No one will ever use it.” T. Edison.

    And what !?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Weyland
      Weyland 1 September 2015 22: 26 New
      0
      Quote: gudgeon
      T. Edison
      - a great plagiarist, and no more (unlike Tesla)! In addition, the goon and the bastard - precisely because of this, not only lost the “current war”, but also dishonored his name as a worthy heir to Dr. Guillotin!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 31 August 2015 11: 19 New
    +5
    military meteorologists “capable of causing hail or avalanches”

    Well, let's say avalanche gathering is safely caused by anti-avalanche service in the Caucasus. And on the global use of "climate weapons" you probably need to agree with a specialist.
  6. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 31 August 2015 11: 21 New
    +9
    I think it is. If they say "no", it means it is sure to be there. A joke of the unknown: "The Russian winter always helped the Russian Army ---- in the War with Napoleon, with Hitler. And in the NUMX, the Russian Winter has already attacked the United States !!" ""
    1. BMP-2
      BMP-2 31 August 2015 11: 43 New
      +3
      By the way, a good idea: I’ll go to my wife and say that menopause weapons do not exist! laughing
  7. tuts
    tuts 31 August 2015 11: 23 New
    +7
    In terms of ???
    In the 1960s, climate-friendly weapons helped the Americans cut off supplies to the North Vietnamese army and ruin the sugarcane crop in Cuba. The UN later banned the use of weather for military purposes, but recent media reports suggest that the CIA is continuing to study these technologies.

    From March 1967 to July 1972, US forces spent about $ 3 million annually on a top secret operation in Southeast Asia. Its goal was to extend the monsoon rainy season and flood the so-called Ho Chi Minh trail - a complex system of communications between North and South Vietnam through the territory of neighboring Cambodia and Laos, operating during the Vietnam War, Gizmodo.com reports.
    According to reports, in 5 years, about 2 thousand sorties were completed.
    The main idea of ​​the project was to disperse rain clouds in certain areas of the area by spraying silver iodide, thereby causing prolonged rains. Silver iodide is practically insoluble in water due to its crystalline structure. It exists in three well-known varieties that vary with temperature. The introduction of a small amount of iodide causes the formation of foci of condensation in the clouds, thereby causing precipitation.
    The use of silver iodide for climate control was actively investigated before the start of the Vietnam War. So, the company General Electric together with the US Department of Defense conducted similar experiments since the early 1960s.
    The famous American meteorologist James Roger Fleming in his book Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control notes that it is still not clear how successful the operation was from a military point of view, however, according to some reports, the use of silver iodide allowed increase the annual rainfall in the region by about 7 times.

    Original news RT in Russian:
    http://russian.rt.com/article/78106
  8. roskot
    roskot 31 August 2015 11: 23 New
    +4
    Does not exist.

    And it is suspicious to me that Primorye floods every year and the taiga burns every year.
    The time will come - we will know.
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 31 August 2015 11: 36 New
      +1
      Quote: roskot

      And it is suspicious to me that every year Primorye floods and every year the taiga burns

      This is all the tricks of amers! fellow Only they also flood their cities (New Orleans) and tornadoes are regularly chased - as if for the sake of excuse, so that they would not be thought of. But we know that you won’t be fooled !!! am
  9. engineer74
    engineer74 31 August 2015 11: 23 New
    +6
    Ministry of Defense: climate weapons do not exist

    Now for sure, Yellowstone will explode! wink
    1. Stanislas
      Stanislas 31 August 2015 13: 48 New
      +1
      Quote: engineer74
      Now for sure, Yellowstone will explode!
      Before this, it is still necessary to make a statement that there is no tectonic weapon.yes
      1. engineer74
        engineer74 31 August 2015 18: 43 New
        +1
        This will be officially announced by the Chief of Staff of the Tectonic Forces! wink A couple of days before ...
  10. Eustace
    Eustace 31 August 2015 11: 23 New
    +1
    It seems to me that NATO used climate weapons during the bombing in Yugoslavia.
  11. zao74
    zao74 31 August 2015 11: 25 New
    +8
    Once they say "does not exist", then the development has come to an end.))
  12. Loner_53
    Loner_53 31 August 2015 11: 31 New
    +2
    The WG recalls that the UN resolution of 1977 prohibits "the use of environmental change technologies for hostile purposes." The United States ratified the relevant international treaty in 1978.

    I doubt the sincerity of the mattress and the UN has already shown itself, especially recently
  13. Merlin
    Merlin 31 August 2015 11: 37 New
    +1
    He rented a room with an old man. He served at the nuclear test sites at the Union, resigned as a lieutenant colonel. He was in Novaya Zemlya, Semipalatinsk. So he told a lot of interesting things. Most of the talk about super-secret weapon designs is myths and misinformation. In particular, stories about the neutron bomb "is an absolute myth. Never before has such a weapon been developed.
    1. gudgeon
      gudgeon 31 August 2015 11: 42 New
      +1
      Quote: Gyrfalcon
      particular stories about the "neutron bomb" is an absolute myth

      The neutron charge is structurally a conventional low-power nuclear charge, to which is added a block containing a small amount of thermonuclear fuel (a mixture of deuterium and tritium). When detonated, the main nuclear charge explodes, the energy of which is used to start the thermonuclear reaction. Most of the explosion energy when using neutron weapons is released as a result of a fusion reaction. The design of the charge is such that up to 80% of the explosion energy is the energy of the fast neutron flux, and only 20% is due to other damaging factors (shock wave, electromagnetic radiation, light radiation) .http: //dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki / 1058871

      S-ss! Just don't tell anyone else. It's a big secret! wink
      1. Merlin
        Merlin 31 August 2015 11: 49 New
        -2
        Are you a nuclear physicist? Or participated in the assembly of such devices? And about various articles on the Internet, I have already talked about myth-making and direct misinformation.
        1. gudgeon
          gudgeon 31 August 2015 11: 55 New
          +2
          Quote: Gyrfalcon
          Are you a nuclear physicist? Or participated in the assembly of such devices? And about various articles on the Internet, I have already talked about myth-making and direct misinformation.

          "Old Man" is certainly a more reliable source of information ...
          1. Merlin
            Merlin 31 August 2015 12: 04 New
            +1
            In this old man, I saw documents and photographs confirming that he was directly related to nuclear weapons tests. And you poke me articles from the Internet and your own speculations.
      2. nizrum
        nizrum 31 August 2015 12: 02 New
        +1
        Isn't that a thermonuclear bomb? repeat
        1. gudgeon
          gudgeon 31 August 2015 12: 23 New
          0
          Quote: nizrum
          Isn't that a thermonuclear bomb? repeat

          EU! good Only fans of mass conspiracy theories can not explain it ...
  14. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 31 August 2015 11: 43 New
    +1
    Quote: roskot
    Does not exist.

    And it is suspicious to me that Primorye floods every year and the taiga burns every year.
    The time will come - we will know.

    It’s sad that it was in the past century. I can’t say exactly those years. I was little when I lived in the Far East. Probably - always. There was simply no publicity. There were floods in my memories and in stories of adults --- always .And sacrifices --- also.
  15. DMB3000
    DMB3000 31 August 2015 11: 44 New
    +1
    oh, these tales ... oh, these storytellers ...
  16. veksha50
    veksha50 31 August 2015 11: 45 New
    0
    "through provoking large-scale droughts or monsoon rains" ...

    Well, THIS employees began to be used-experimented back in Vietnam ...

    And NITO will not tell us about the capabilities of the existing and even more so developed climate weapons, since this is information constituting a state secret ...

    And in the USA and in the USSR (I don’t know how in Russia) such weapons existed and improved all the time ... And this was far from expressed in dispersal of rain clouds or avalanches ...

    So both the UN Convention and the official’s speech are empty talk ...
  17. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 31 August 2015 11: 53 New
    0
    In response to Washington’s provocative statements about the use of climate weapons by Russia, it is proposed by a separate UN resolution to condemn the intervention of iron man in widespread armed conflicts, because the latter is a US citizen, invoicing the government for damages from "natural" disasters over the past 50 years (the first mention of railway station in March 1963 by writer and "eyewitness" Stan Lee) yes .
  18. Nitarius
    Nitarius 31 August 2015 12: 14 New
    0
    ))) NO SO NO .. Do not upset partners))
  19. shelva
    shelva 31 August 2015 12: 17 New
    +1
    The WG recalls that the UN resolution of 1977 prohibits "the use of environmental change technologies for hostile purposes." The United States ratified the relevant international treaty in 1978.
    When Americans were worried about UN bans even with their own ratification ?, they have long regarded this organization as pocket-sized.
  20. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 31 August 2015 12: 21 New
    +1
    Climatic weapons exist and are used. The so-called "microwaves" of HAARP in Alaska, Norway and Greenland, which supposedly serve to influence the ionosphere, are also used to heat the upper atmosphere and accelerate or decelerate ultra-high-speed air flows that move in the upper atmosphere, which leads to anticyclones, which hinder or vice versa, accelerate the movement of air masses in the lower atmosphere or create “corridors” through which these or those air masses escape, which leads to the removal of, for example, moist or dry air in the lower layers from one place to another. Thus, droughts or floods are caused.
  21. Cynic
    Cynic 31 August 2015 12: 46 New
    0
    The more hard they convince me of something, the more doubt. Well, at least _ Why deny that does not exist anyway ?!
  22. gridasov
    gridasov 31 August 2015 13: 05 New
    0
    But what to understand that such a weapon is not necessarily a statement of the Ministry of Defense?
  23. sv68
    sv68 31 August 2015 13: 28 New
    0
    got it !!! in mo stated that climatic weapons are currently not on sale !!! for personal use !!! who and why so distorted their statement ?? !! ??
  24. ZKB
    ZKB 31 August 2015 14: 05 New
    0
    what nonsense is a climatic weapon ... given the peculiarities of the climatic zones of Russia, we have so far the majority are unfavorable. and everywhere people live))) in addition, I think, creating such a weapon is more difficult than opposing it. regular fraud amers for the development of capital. An effective weapon is when the cost of its production is covered by its destructive factor. and this is nonsense from the category of flying saucers, invisible planes, superexoskeletons and other crap
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 31 August 2015 14: 20 New
      0
      Quote: ZKB
      An effective weapon is when the cost of its production is covered by its destructive factor.

      An interesting technique for presenting efficiency, so you can swipe at the introduction of self-sufficiency!
      Life truth _
      To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the pinnacle of martial art. To defeat the enemy without a battle is the summit.
  25. SUMRAK75
    SUMRAK75 31 August 2015 14: 34 New
    +2
    Yes, and so heaped up enough in nature ... when we finish the thread with nature, and she won’t understand the jokes, she will shake herself and sweep us away like germs.
  26. Burmistr
    Burmistr 31 August 2015 16: 54 New
    +1
    “World experience shows that global impacts are impossible, since it requires very large energies, costs.” On a global scale, this is impossible, ”said Udrish.


    Sly, offspring.
  27. Old26
    Old26 1 September 2015 08: 44 New
    -1
    Quote: tots
    In the 1960s, climate-friendly weapons helped the Americans cut off supplies to the North Vietnamese army and ruin the sugarcane crop in Cuba. The UN later banned the use of weather for military purposes, but recent media reports suggest that the CIA is continuing to study these technologies.

    The use of weather for military purposes (local) and climatic weapons - although this is close, but still not the same thing.
    Problems cause drought or rain - they are not. But to carry out global changes, to manage this process on a global scale - which, in essence, is a climate weapon - is not there. In general, the end of the 60s and the beginning of the 70s was fruitful for inventing new types of weapons: climatic, geophysical (tectonic) and others. And the work was mainly curtailed due to the fact that it was not possible to localize these effects in one place. No one knew what would result from the same impact.
    Of course, the NAARP range exists (as is the case here in the Volga region), but in order to influence the atmosphere, in order to cause global changes in a particular region, the impact of energies is required several orders of magnitude higher than the equipment of these complexes can provide.

    It’s the same with all the beloved explosions in the faults along the coast of the United States and explosions of nuclear weapons with the aim of causing a tsunami.

    Regarding the tsunami, scientists argue that this requires in-1 local exposure at specific points. In-2, energy should be several orders of magnitude greater than the most powerful ammunition. EMNIP figures were called about 70-100 gigatons (moreover, one-time and in one place)
    Explosions in the fault are also not predictable. Since the Earth is still a "living" organism, everything is interconnected, and as it was once written (fortunately by scientists, not journalists), it is completely impossible to predict what will happen. For example, by blowing up a nuclear hazard borehole in the region of China (at the bottom), you can cause a catastrophic earthquake in California and at the same time somewhere else, for example, where nothing ever happens, for example, in the Baltic Sea basin, or in the mountains of South America, or in the Alps .

    In addition to the disaster in California, the much-beloved explosion explosion in the San Anders Fault can cause a similar explosion somewhere in India, or in the Mediterranean-Black Seas.

    Therefore, it is still worth listening to the opinion of a specialist, and not be holier than the Pope himself, saying that "we know that it exists."

    Local influences - yes, they are possible, and local ones in time and place, and the given example of Vietnam is just such a local impact. But it required constant exposure to the weather in that area; a large number of sorties were carried out to plant clouds. A remote control and global, and this is what they call climate weapons fortunately impossible ...