US worried about Israel’s readiness to attack Iran

33
US worried about Israel’s readiness to attack Iran

The US leadership is seriously concerned about Israel’s readiness to strike at Iranian nuclear facilities. This was stated by a high-ranking source in the US State Department.

According to him, the “Cursor” writes, the Americans suspect that Israel will conduct a military action not agreed with them after the publication of the next IAEA report on Iran. The document, which should be released in November, states that Tehran has made significant progress in developing nuclear weapons.

To prevent war, the States are actively trying to convince the UN Security Council to introduce new, much tougher sanctions against Tehran. The White House believes that increased international pressure on Iran will force Israel to abandon its intention to solve the problem by military means.

Recall that on the eve of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once again reminded fellow citizens of the Iranian threat. According to him, Tehran, armed with a nuclear bomb, poses a great danger to the world as a whole and to Israel in particular.

Earlier, both American and Israeli leaders recognized that a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities would be essentially useless, since it would not be able to destroy them all at once. In addition, the United States fears that such an action would lead to the beginning of a large-scale war throughout the Middle East.

Iran began developing nuclear technology in the middle of the 1980s. Western countries accuse Iran of developing a nuclear weapon under the cover of a peaceful atomic program. Tehran rejects all allegations and states that a nuclear program is needed to meet the country's electricity demands. International mediators on the Iranian nuclear issue, together with the IAEA, are trying to get Iran to suspend uranium enrichment activities.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergh
    +5
    2 November 2011 15: 38
    Well, the Merikos are still those storytellers, again they are plotting something with a distant sight! They probably have a whole staff working on new scarecrows.
    1. +1
      2 November 2011 15: 43
      Even McCain last year asked about the consequences of a possible nuclear strike on Iran. answered in one word: `Armageddon`
    2. Tjumenec72
      +2
      2 November 2011 15: 51
      you see they don’t like that somewhere that is decided without them)
      ... one Jew got another)))
    3. Ivan35
      +1
      2 November 2011 16: 44
      I completely agree! Storytellers - or better to say, masters of lies and disinformation! Pendostan and Israel are one and the same - and all the talk about the alleged "drain" of Israel is an element of their info-war.
      Do not even hesitate - this is their joint info - action - perhaps preparing for a limited strike on Iran and Syria.
    4. Alex63
      -1
      3 November 2011 00: 46
      Israel climbed across the Old Man, so the amers are unhappy. Although Israel is flesh from the flesh of the United States. An apple from an apple tree ...
  2. cVM
    cVM
    +3
    2 November 2011 16: 22
    Yes, the consequences will be enormous, Iran is not Syria, but oil prices will rise for sure, the economies of developed countries and even developing countries cannot be eliminated, Iran should not be bombed, I don’t think Israel will do it
    1. itr
      +1
      3 November 2011 09: 38
      How sad nothing will happen Alone in the field is not a warrior Jackals will attack and tear in one flock
      They said the same thing about Iraq but you see for yourself what was
      They say that world wars will not be only local conflicts
      Just look at the number of countries participating in the conflict (purely global)
      every year I understand more and more that the USSR was a just state and I lived in it and it makes me happy
  3. +7
    2 November 2011 16: 22
    After this, the Iranians really need to accelerate work on the development of atomic weapons, Americans and Jews always, when they are going to peacefully bomb someone, raise a howl about "world security" Although they are the first to pose a threat to this world ...
  4. LESHA pancake
    +4
    2 November 2011 16: 23
    Pandora’s box is open. Now the Jews, looking at the death of Gaddafi, decided to drop the bright slogans of democracy to the Iranians in the form of bombs.
  5. 0
    2 November 2011 17: 09
    Yes, this is another provocation, previously agreed upon with Israel. And it was created so that the states could further crush Iran with their sanctions, etc. Only now they are acting as peacekeepers, allegedly fighting for peace in the Middle East.
    1. lightforcer
      0
      2 November 2011 20: 16
      Mahmoud himself is still a provocateur. This is how it feels for the Jews to listen to this.

      [img] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FckLO8HcNyo&feature=player_embedded [/ img]
    2. lightforcer
      +1
      2 November 2011 20: 20
      What is it like for Jews to listen to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FckLO8HcNyo&feature=player_embedded

      And if McCain becomes president in the USA and says the same about Russia, then what?
  6. -7
    2 November 2011 17: 32
    The Jews are doing the right thing, and Pakistan would also be gouging. Muslims with a nuclear bomb that a monkey with a grenade
    1. VALENOK
      -3
      2 November 2011 17: 49
      I completely agree while the Europeans are holding a lump in the world, and this is better than some kind of Kurdestan. We should not interfere with putting things in order with the wrong hands.
  7. +2
    2 November 2011 17: 47
    As I understand it, this is another trick for "reasonable" pressure on Iran. Like, in order to prevent a war unleashed by frostbitten Jews (crystal clear states aside), it is necessary to put pressure on Iran to save the world from a nuclear war. And even simpler: " you will support us, because we have good goals, or do not interfere with saving the world at least "
  8. 0
    2 November 2011 18: 31
    the Americans themselves podrabuzhdayut Israel for military aggression, in order to start another military operation in the Middle East, why should troops return home in Iran, too, need to get rid of the dictator and blame everyone on the poor unfortunate Israelis they live so poorly in the region, around them Arabs constantly oppress them if not the United States would have long wiped off the face of the earth, and watchmakers with hairdressers have increased all over the world
  9. Noni4
    0
    2 November 2011 18: 41
    To prevent war, the States will start a war.
  10. +2
    2 November 2011 18: 42
    The US leadership is seriously concerned about Israel’s readiness to strike at Iran’s nuclear facilities.

    That's how simple it is! And the US leadership is simply concerned ........... Now, if China or Russia tried to bomb Israeli nuclear facilities! That noise would be
  11. -1
    2 November 2011 18: 49
    Another action aimed at starting a war in the Middle East, Israel in this case is a puppet in the hands of the United States. and the United States has one task to crush all countries in the Middle East, to seize resources and take Russia into the ring.
  12. Patriot
    0
    2 November 2011 18: 51
    I think that the Amers are not at all concerned, but Israel itself is pushing aggression against Iran. But, it’s just not clear why this is happening? For, there are nicer living their Jewish-Masson Jewish relatives. Are they ready to sacrifice their lives for the sake of their aggressive plans ??? What do you think of this, Comrades? In general, how many times have you seen how impudently the USA is maintained by this impudent state, which, according to many, DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXIST.
    And what was the other day. When Unesco accepted Palestinian Autonomy into its ranks ... the United States completely covered up Unesco funding. And Israel accelerated the construction of new settlements on the territory seized from the Arabs.
    So, comrades, if we finally finish off our country, its army and industry, such a fate may await us. You just need to figure out what fate do you like best Indian or Arab-Palestinian?
  13. escobar
    0
    2 November 2011 19: 00
    One thing is clear, the Pindos in Libya will not stop. I am sure they have several options for maintaining financial and military-political hegemony in the world. And now information is being cast to probe the reactions of leading players.
  14. FreZZZeR
    0
    2 November 2011 19: 14
    Nobody is going to attack anyone, another duck so that you and I will be distracted from Syria. Israel and the United States have one policy, a witty step for the dumb!
  15. dred
    -2
    2 November 2011 19: 15
    The pendos as always plays a point.
  16. Cross
    -1
    2 November 2011 19: 15
    Well, yes ... they themselves make up plans for attacks at their headquarters, and then suddenly they "got worried" ... like conscience tortured, right? storytellers, she Gd ...
  17. 0
    2 November 2011 19: 20
    Something amers themselves do not even give a break. Something about them is growing!
  18. BOSS
    0
    2 November 2011 19: 27
    Israel alone will not trample on Iran, it is not Palestine and they understand it. On the Persians in the world there are too many countries tied up. In general, the Pindos again start to do something :) But the whole world is trying to convince that they are concerned about Israel, well done)))))
    1. lightforcer
      0
      2 November 2011 20: 07
      Why not? In 2008, after a five-day war, Russian troops discovered that Israel had prepared a springboard for an attack on Iran in Georgia. Here by the way I found interesting news:

      Israel refused the USA, war with Iran is approaching

      Israel is preparing to launch a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities, despite US objections.


      As reported today, April 18, by the London edition of The Times, Israel is carrying out numerous preparatory measures in order to be ready to strike at Iran within a few days, or even hours after receiving an order from the country's political leadership. As part of these activities, the army will conduct two large-scale civil defense exercises previously reported by Cursor. Officially, these exercises have nothing to do with the possibility of a military strike on Iran, but the British publication reports that their main purpose is to prepare citizens for possible retaliation from Tehran and its allies.


      An anonymous defense official told the British newspaper that in the event of a military strike against Iran, a simultaneous attack on at least 12 targets located at different points in Iranian territory would be required. Among the areas of possible attack is called Natanez, where enriched uranium is produced, Isfahan, where 250 tons of gas are stored in tunnels, and Arak, where plutonium is produced. According to experts, the distance to the targets is about 870 kilometers, and the Israeli Air Force practiced overcoming this distance. According to some estimates, the raids on convoys with weapons in Sudan were, in a way, a rehearsal for a possible attack on Iran.


      Let us remind you that the United States is strongly opposed to a possible Israeli strike on Iran. As Cursor previously reported, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said recently that "such a strike, as a last resort, will slow down the development of the Iranian nuclear program for 2-4 years, and the harm caused by such a step may outweigh the benefit."


      We add that US President Barack Obama is also actively reviewing American policy towards Iran, and in particular, he is ready to weigh the possibility of rejecting the requirement for this country to stop uranium enrichment before negotiations with the West begin. Israel, in turn, has repeatedly stated that they will not be ready to put up with a situation in which Iran will have nuclear weapons.


      It is expected that this issue (along with the Palestinian issue) will become crucial during the negotiations between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama. Recall that Obama intends to visit Israel in June, during the general election in Iran.


      You could publish it here, but its release date is 18.04.2009/XNUMX/XNUMX. That is, nothing has changed in Iran-Israel relations.
  19. 0
    2 November 2011 19: 35
    Forever Pindos than something concerned. Soon the pimple on the w ... Ksyushi Sobchak will bother them.
  20. Pol
    +1
    2 November 2011 20: 26
    Let us recall how the Pendos and Co (or rather Co and Pendos) invaded Libya. Raised the rats. Gaddafi hoped for the loyalty of Europe - "friends", and did not use harsh suppression of "riots" and did not put up resistance to NATO troops. And he could !!!
    (but even with all this, Muammar remained a real man!)
    In Syria and Iran, this scenario will not work! The United States and Israel know this. Therefore, they scream loudly about the axis of evil and about the nuclear program.
    But now they have been yelling for a long time !!! And climbed to Libya! (they didn’t wait there).
    As BOSS said, "Israel alone cannot trample on Iran." Of course not trample. Will not cope! The states do not need this either - terrorist attacks will be worse than the towers of a shopping center ...
    Moreover, Turkey has begun to create "gag".
    The USA is concerned - a good mine with a bad game !!!!
    The task of the pendos is to pit and wait, wait and take advantage !!!
    And if something goes wrong - "it's not us! We were worried"
    Although these bloodsuckers have everything calculated on 20 moves ....
  21. zczczc
    0
    2 November 2011 20: 51
    This is called buzz (noise) - you need to maintain noise when there is nothing to say.
  22. balabas
    0
    2 November 2011 21: 09
    "The Americans suspect that Israel will carry out a military action not coordinated with them after the publication of the next IAEA report on Iran." ------- really amused; this is simply not possible without American permission.
  23. +1
    2 November 2011 22: 13
    A very interesting question, the US is clearly more concerned that someone might start pursuing their military ambitions without their highest permission. many of their so-called "allies clearly want to break away from their control. War is not needed, but intentions are worthy of attention. Will there be more ....
    1. +1
      2 November 2011 22: 53
      Dear Alexander Borisovich, I will express my point of view - all the US statements were edited by the Israeli corrector, since the key posts in the US National Security Council ...... are correct. And you probably know about the representatives of the Federal Reserve System - a private shop with the right to print money
  24. kesa1111
    0
    3 November 2011 06: 50
    The United States does not need another war. Israel will have to grow wiser.
  25. specnazst
    +1
    3 November 2011 07: 00
    Israel just wants to be the best in "its" world
  26. Mikula
    +3
    3 November 2011 09: 27
    And can I, as a resident of Israel, express a different point of view. Namely, that Armageddon will be inevitable if Iran creates a bomb. Because the ayatols believe that Allah will protect them from the blow of retaliation and, having summed up nothing, they will use the bomb first. How do you like this scenario. Or do you think that Islamic fanaticism is also an invention of amers.
  27. Chamberlain
    +2
    3 November 2011 12: 53
    Faster let them start the war, damn it
    There is nothing to calf with muslims
  28. bober
    +2
    3 November 2011 16: 26
    pendos had to leave you with Germany at 41 and no help. you probably forgot that the USSR had an alliance with Germany, the so-called Molotov-Ribentrop Pact. And the restoration of the German military machine took place with the participation of the USSR. After 18 years, Germany could not have any then a meaningful army.
    and now Russia is, as it were, a peacemaker. In fact, Iran should be the most worried about Russia. You are wrong for them, if you remember, and they are not allies to you, it’s pleasant for you to deceive yourself
    1. 0
      4 November 2011 10: 57
      And you probably forgot that before the Molotov-Ribentrop Pact there were pacts: England-Germany and France-Germany, and that when the Germans captured Czechoslovakia, Poland did not give permission for the passage of Soviet troops.
  29. Mesniy
    0
    4 November 2011 10: 35
    It's time to destroy Iran, an extremely rotten state. I am ready to personally participate, I hate muslik.
  30. bober
    0
    4 November 2011 17: 50
    in fact, we must remember that Germany and the USSR shared Poland. Where do you think the captured prisoners of fire shot in Katyn came from? And this is a fraud that the union supposedly wanted to help Czechoslovakia. For example, Germany was an ally of the USSR.

    it’s just Russia’s time to decide who it is and not to fight for zones of influence and not to sow confusion in the world. I think it should be clear that Russia is not the most influential country in the world. Iran has its own sins, and Gaddafi was head over heels and therefore no one and didn’t defend it. It would have been bad form. Remember that the Americans in 86 bombed Libya simply and you will understand that the Gaddafs gave time for correction