Russian Foreign Ministry: under the pretext of complying with the INF Treaty, Washington is trying to control the Russian defense industry complex

76
Washington, urging Moscow to recognize the violations under the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, proposes to eliminate them in a “verifiable way”, that is, to actually put the Russian defense industry under control, which is not a serious approach, said Mikhail Ulyanov, Department of Foreign Affairs Director.

Russian Foreign Ministry: under the pretext of complying with the INF Treaty, Washington is trying to control the Russian defense industry complex
Launch of the P-500 cruise missile of the 9K720 "Iskander-M" tactical missile system

“We immediately expressed readiness to substantively discuss American concerns and asked for more specific information. The United States refused to do this, stating that we should already know what was going on. We were almost ultimately offered “to sprinkle ashes on our heads,” admit violations and eliminate them, moreover, in a “verifiable way”. It is not clear what kind of verification can be discussed if the previously existing verification mechanism in the framework of the INF have ceased to operate. It seems that the partners, without any legal basis, are seeking to establish control over our defense industry and test sites, ”
quotes Ulyanova ВПК.name.

“This, of course, is not serious. But the main thing is not even this, but the fact that it is impossible to build a full-fledged conversation on such an exotic by normal standards basis. All this causes a scandalous memory. history with "weapons mass destruction of Saddam Hussein, ”he said.

Earlier, US Assistant Secretary of State Rose Goethemuller said: “The United States found that the Russian Federation is violating its obligations under the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF): 500 km, and also not to possess and not produce launchers for such missiles. "

Ulyanov on this occasion explained that “at first, the American partners were confused in the testimony and it was difficult to understand what was going on, since various missiles were called“ trespassers ”, including the P-500 and PC-26”.

“Not immediately, but in the end, it became obvious that we are still talking about something else: about a certain cruise missile, which allegedly was tested a few years ago at a distance falling under the prohibition set by the INF Treaty,” the diplomat said.

This was confirmed by Goethemuller: “As we have established, the INF Treaty does not violate the P-500 rocket. Contrary to some opinions, the PC-26 ballistic missile is also not related to the INF Treaty. We are talking about a ground-based cruise missile with a range of 500 to 5500 km. We are sure that the Russian leadership knows which rocket we mean. ”
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +36
    6 July 2015 12: 21
    Enough for us the betrayal of the "spotted" and the stupidity of EBN. Until now, we cannot move away from the consequences of the criminal policies of the then rulers. We must do our job, produce the weapons that are necessary for guaranteed protection of Russia's security. Kidalov will no longer be !!!
    1. +18
      6 July 2015 12: 28
      An article of our forum member was here in the morning on this topic .. I completely agree with her! The United States is shaking us, but we’ll break through! We can’t leave yet, but in preparation we need to give an adequate answer!
      1. +21
        6 July 2015 12: 33
        We are talking about a ground-based cruise missile with a range of 500 to 5500 km. We are confident that the Russian leadership knows which missile we have in mind. ”

        - you see the gopher
        - Not
        - And I do not, but he is!
        1. +8
          6 July 2015 12: 57
          Well, downright immortal creation of Ilf and Petrov. Only Russia is not a "Union of Sword and Plowshare". Those gentlemen had to make scary eyes - and everything is ready - "Yes, we are doing, we are doing. And we are testing. And they wanted to deceive you. And the boss lives in the third entrance, into the yard and to the left. I can show you."
          In this tone, talk with your Baltic "allies", gentlemen of the overseas.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +2
          6 July 2015 13: 32
          The commander said: "Hamster." - and no gophers!
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. 0
          6 July 2015 20: 26
          Quote: Stalker.1977
          We are talking about a ground-based cruise missile with a range of 500 to 5500 km. We are confident that the Russian leadership knows which missile we have in mind. ”


          Who will already send these impudent Yankees to a cow in Opu? Maybe the Foreign Ministry will select the words diplomatically ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +8
        6 July 2015 12: 34
        Land-based SMD missiles are needed like air. But our "friends" should learn about them after their deployment. So that not one mouse squeaks ...
        1. +10
          6 July 2015 12: 50
          Quote: maxcor1974
          Land-based SMD missiles are needed like air. But our "friends" should learn about them after their deployment. So that not one mouse squeaks ...

          This is not about missiles, if you do not understand. Under the pretext of non-compliance with the INF Treaty, the Americans are trying to slam our missile industry.
          Although this is not surprising, the Americans have always acted this way, remember at least perestroika. It is surprising our inability to act proactively, to act with such clever schemes to undermine the military power of our "partners." non-proliferation of bacteriological weapons ". The Americans are building laboratories lately quite cheerfully ..........
          1. +3
            6 July 2015 15: 18
            And what about the ABM Treaty, from which the Yankees unilaterally withdrew, is that "the ram nachhal"?
            We are sure that the Russian leadership knows which rocket we have in mind

            In the place of the Russian leadership, I would answer: "We twisted you with your knowledge on the reproductive organ." However, it is impossible - "our geopolitical partners." I got this polite ...
      4. +1
        6 July 2015 20: 20
        Quote: MIKHAN
        but preparing to give an adequate answer

        The basic principle of US international military policy is to be the first to blame others for something that it has already violated. Therefore, a violation by the United States of the INF Treaty, as previously the ABM Treaty, and even earlier not the proliferation of nuclear weapons, should be considered a fait accompli and an adequate response prepared.
    2. +4
      6 July 2015 13: 08
      So at the helm, liberoids will easily go to a deal, especially if the grandmother gives it. Look, like in TTD newspaper racks, they publish different missiles and cars and do not sit in prisons.
      1. +1
        6 July 2015 14: 16
        It sounds like: you’re a thief, my friend, you stole from me, well, you know that you don’t have to make excuses, but since you justify yourself quickly return, well, something like that.
    3. +2
      6 July 2015 14: 59
      We need not only the betrayal of EBN, but the betrayal of the humpbacked one, who cut the BZHRK to please the mattresses. Pad.a.
  2. +15
    6 July 2015 12: 22
    Everything is good to cooperate with mattresses !!! There is only one answer to all their lies - a rocket according to the tonsils!
  3. +6
    6 July 2015 12: 22
    In response, Russia needs to accuse the United States of deploying nuclear bombs in Europe, and in response to their actions, deploy our nuclear forces in Belarus and Kazakhstan.
    And to establish a nuclear warhead on the calibers, let the Warsaw and halibuts around Europe cut circles.
    1. +3
      6 July 2015 12: 40
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      in response to their actions, deploy our nuclear forces in Belarus and Kazakhstan.



      The leaders of Belarus and Kazakhstan are not as stupid as the leaders of European countries ... Nobody will deploy nuclear weapons on their territory, making themselves targets in a future conflict ...

      Yes, we, in fact, do not need this, we have enough of our territory ...

      You just need to not even listen and not hear all these amer's claims, which they cannot even formulate, except as stupidly: "Russia is violating !!!" ...

      Along with the strategic nuclear triad, it is urgent (!!!) to return and develop operational-tactical nuclear weapons ... Only in this way can we make them unsure of applying their plan for a massive high-precision strike on the territory of Russia .... For the simple reason, that nuclear weapons - as targets - to track is much more difficult ...
      1. -2
        6 July 2015 12: 57
        Quote: veksha50
        Along with the strategic nuclear triad, it is urgent (!!!) to return and develop operational-tactical nuclear weapons ...

        I doubt that this will change anything. For example, the United States does not have enough money, they can quickly design a more modern model of the old Pershing-2 rocket. And then the flight time to Moscow will again be 5 minutes. Russia will have to work hard to produce enough medium-range missiles, given that the factories are now engaged in the production of strategic missiles and are 100% loaded.
        In addition, the United States already has a THAAD and a land variant of the Aegis, they were specially designed to intercept medium-range missiles.
        1. +1
          6 July 2015 13: 41
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          they can quickly design a more modern model of the old Pershing-2 rocket. And then the flight time to Moscow will again be 5 minutes.



          So they will place this advanced Pershing on the territory of Europe, and turn it into the same target for our nuclear weapons ... For THIS (!!!) reason, they are now touching on this issue ...

          And if you argue, how can you possibly not rearm the army and navy at all, for the simple reason that the Amers have more money and they will immediately find the antidote ???

          That's just because of the lack of money in our country, the development of nuclear weapons will now be the most effective countermeasure to the deployment of NATO forces in Europe ...
          1. -1
            6 July 2015 13: 56
            Quote: veksha50

            So they will place this advanced Pershing on the territory of Europe, and turn it into the same target for our nuclear weapons ... For THIS (!!!) reason, they are now touching on this issue ...

            And if you argue, how can you possibly not rearm the army and navy at all, for the simple reason that the Amers have more money and they will immediately find the antidote ???

            That's just because of the lack of money in our country, the development of nuclear weapons will now be the most effective countermeasure to the deployment of NATO forces in Europe ...

            In Russia, only missiles capable of intercepting medium-range ballistic missiles (C 500) at a decent distance are being created; the S-400 can only intercept medium-range missiles only at a distance of 60 kilometers. And the United States already has these missiles capable of operating at ranges of 200-500 km.
        2. 0
          6 July 2015 13: 48
          ... Russia will have to work hard to produce enough medium-range missiles, given that now the plants are engaged in the production of strategic missiles and are 100% loaded .....

          .... Actually, aircraft factories were involved in the production of the Kyrgyz Republic, including .... So to say, the load ..... hi
          1. 0
            6 July 2015 13: 52
            Quote: aleks 62
            .... Actually, aircraft factories were involved in the production of the Kyrgyz Republic, including .... So to say, the load .....

            It was about ballistic missiles of something like Pioneer, Pace C, Speed. Cruise missiles are mostly subsonic, hypersonic cr is still being created.
            1. 0
              6 July 2015 14: 18
              ..... Cruise missiles are mostly subsonic .....

              ...Well yes..... laughing .... Especially the "old lady" X-22 ..... And not only .... bully
              1. 0
                6 July 2015 14: 26
                Quote: aleks 62
                ... Well, yes ..... .... Especially the "old lady" X-22 ..... And not only ....

                Firstly, the X-22 is anti-ship, secondly heptyl (preparation for a combat mission takes a lot of time since it needs to be refueled), thirdly, the range is only 600 km, where should it be located in Kaliningrad? In the case of the first strike, theoretically it will fly somewhere to Poland, but in the case of a weapon of retaliation it does not fit, because of the long time it took to prepare the rocket. Yes, and the United States and NATO air defense / pro also do not sleep, along with aviation.
                1. 0
                  6 July 2015 15: 38
                  ... secondly heptyl ....

                  ..... belay .... Have you seen her at least once "live" ????? ..... Actually, a conversation about subsonic and supersonic topics .... And you always strive to "move out" somewhere .... request
                  1. 0
                    6 July 2015 18: 43
                    Quote: aleks 62
                    ... Have you seen her at least once "live" ????? ..... Actually, a conversation about subsonic and supersonic topics .... And you always try to "move out" somewhere ...

                    You mentioned the X-22 as a medium-range missile.
                  2. 0
                    6 July 2015 19: 50
                    Quote: aleks 62
                    . Have you ever seen her "live" ????? ..

                    As for heptyl, I was mistaken. TG-02 fuel (3rd middle hazard class) and AK-27I oxidizer. This does not change the essence, the rocket needs to be refueled before a combat mission. Solid rockets are much better in this regard.
                    1. 0
                      7 July 2015 11: 06
                      ..... As for heptyl, I was mistaken. ..... Solid propellant rockets are much better in this regard.

                      ..... good ...... Solid fuel have less energy, respectively range ..... The X-22 has a firing range of about 350 km, practical about 280 km .... But at what speed !!!!! .... Almost 3 Mach .... hi
      2. 0
        6 July 2015 15: 42
        Quote: veksha50
        Along with the strategic nuclear triad, it is urgent (!!!) to return and develop operational-tactical nuclear weapons ...


        I cannot agree with you Georgy. Just the case when the exit from the RIAC is only on hand - that's why they stink mercilessly, looking for an excuse ... An excuse to return their RIAC to Europe. They don't care about our RIAC, but we have them in Europe, the 5th point. Coming out of this contract is like death - the mattress is just waiting for it. Here ... Another question is that somewhere, like that, by someone (which mattress toppers suggest ...) is quiet. rivet products without noise and dust and fold for a "rainy day" ...
    2. 0
      6 July 2015 14: 19
      What for? Nuclear bombs on planes in Europe just fall within a short range, to prove that the states first violated and actually begin to develop this system and even do not need to place anyone anywhere, these bastards will begin to agree.
  4. +8
    6 July 2015 12: 23
    "American partners were confused in testimony"
    The phrase pleased the soul! Just like those under investigation ... Or, let them slowly get used to it ?! feel
  5. +1
    6 July 2015 12: 24
    Totally beached the coast.
  6. +9
    6 July 2015 12: 24
    Yeah:
    - show us one ...
    - what - "that"? ...
    - Well, what you yourself know ..
    Practically, A.Raikin’s humoresque
    1. +1
      6 July 2015 12: 35
      those that yesterday at 5 were such .....))))))))))))))))))))
      also not a bad humor
    2. +3
      6 July 2015 12: 42
      Quote: Moore
      Yeah:
      - show us one...
      - what - "that"? ...
      - Well, what you yourself know.



      Well, it’s a shame to take off your pants in public ... This is their norm ...
  7. +2
    6 July 2015 12: 24
    But h.r.en them all the way.
    In general, get out of all the agreements altogether and let them sit.
  8. +3
    6 July 2015 12: 25
    go there, don’t know where. bring it - not knowing what ....
  9. 0
    6 July 2015 12: 25
    "We are confident that the Russian leadership knows what kind of missile we mean" .... Directly some secrets of the Madrid court.
  10. +1
    6 July 2015 12: 26
    ... We are sure that the Russian leadership knows which rocket we have in mind ... What are you sick of?
  11. 0
    6 July 2015 12: 26
    I liked the phrase: "... you yourself know what this is about."

    And if we do not know then what? Will they send us their designs and then blame us? it will be interesting - just like in an old joke - cut off my tongue, I should see it!

    And if we even know - then what?
  12. +1
    6 July 2015 12: 27
    Again "partners". How infuriating it is. The Bryansk wolf is their partner.
    1. +1
      6 July 2015 12: 46
      Plus, in the light of the fact that they have generally supported the overthrow of all states, there is a proposal not to call them partners. And somehow it already sounds completely obscene.
  13. 0
    6 July 2015 12: 28
    We are confident that the Russian leadership knows which missile we have in mind. ”

    I guess that the Americans mean the X101 / X102 and the development of a shipable version of these cute little birds
    1. 0
      6 July 2015 12: 36
      These are air-based missiles. We are talking about the alleged planning and maneuvering warhead for Iskander. Rumors hit in the internet for them. range increases significantly.
      1. 0
        6 July 2015 12: 52
        Quote: Gogia
        We are talking about the alleged planning and maneuvering warhead for Iskander. Rumors hit in the internet for them. range increases significantly.

        It also says that the R-500 is not for Iskander.
        Just howl raised with the announcement of the x101 shipping option.
        American logic is "iron". The karable option is, yes, legal, but the installations can be removed and installed ashore, therefore, you will be breaking. Ayyayay, nizya
    2. +1
      6 July 2015 14: 54
      Hi!! gentlemen that are worried. Not so many years have passed and now you can see the subtle and ominous policy of the United States. For ten years there has been an information war to cover the deployment of the forward-based system of the Advanced Areas of the ABM. They left the Treaty. The USA knew perfectly well that Russia was simply not able to respond. DPRK and from Iran and POS and SYRIA that the memory is short. Under this noise, the regions were defined and everything became surprisingly quiet. You did not notice the threat of a missile attack suddenly ceased to be America's main problem. After the Libyan Revolution, a new company suddenly started where Russia becomes an obstacle to the American world. We did not listen to our liberals and chose Putin. Or memory tends to keep such little things in mind as not essential. We did not automatically approve any decision affecting our interests. Then the company began to convince all our neighbors of Russia's aggression. Our Russian propagandists are penniless they don’t stand. And the USA is definitely calculating it. We are constantly late; there are no clear goals. USA. The goals are very severe for us. The next step in the USA, once the discrimination company has already gained such momentum, is clear. Clearly place shock systems around the perimeter of our Motherland. Logic is the iron strike that those who have sheltered all the toys will know. The USA will equally negotiate with those who are guaranteed to have the opportunity to give such an answer that the United States itself will not seem a little. Pos USSR so far this is not. This makes the US rush to look for any imaginary threat from Russia. We are not too submissive and very uncomfortable, this is the main rebuke of TRUE DEMOCRATS. We will cope with others, and here we’ll misfire. Now the goal is that we are breaking and stop the USA from spreading democracy near us .
  14. +2
    6 July 2015 12: 29
    We are confident that the Russian leadership knows which missile we have in mind. ”


    In short, you yourself will determine what you are and where you are violating, and we will determine the punishment for you.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. 0
    6 July 2015 12: 29
    I wonder what kind of rocket they mean ???
    It looks something like this:
    -so you are a murderer, well, you know who you killed, well, you understand who we mean
  17. +1
    6 July 2015 12: 30
    Do not play the fool, America ...
  18. +1
    6 July 2015 12: 31
    Yes, culturally send them to the woods for firewood or to some river for water, let them go long and far. laughing
  19. +1
    6 July 2015 12: 31
    After the article, there is a simple desire to send them purely in Russian to ..y ... it was specifically said ... that Europe is secondary in order to ... not sit out for you in a puddle
  20. +2
    6 July 2015 12: 34
    To write an answer - please clarify which of the new fifteen types of cruise missiles you had in mind? The government is at a loss, cannot choose for itself.
  21. +3
    6 July 2015 12: 34
    All contracts are in the trash can. They lived normally, they didn't quarrel with anyone, they didn't bomb anyone, they didn't interfere with anyone, they didn't arrange Maidans in other countries. And we were not the first to start. The world now faces the threat of war more than ever. Not just wars. Nuclear war. And until the former "partners" come to their senses, missiles of various systems and ranges will appear like mushrooms after rain.
  22. +4
    6 July 2015 12: 35
    Remember the fate of Gaddafi, Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, they all yielded to the demands of the "world community." First a little, and then ...
  23. +5
    6 July 2015 12: 35
    Enough ...

    Since the end of the 80s (even before the collapse of the USSR) American "controllers" were already freely walking around our positional areas of combat units and military-industrial complex enterprises, and ours, traveling as if in exchange, were practically not allowed out of one base. ..
    From the end of the 80s they forced to cut the old P-12s first, and then it came to the Pioneers, and then the BZHRK (this is no longer the RIAC, but still) ...

    And so, when they "leveled", and the boorish behavior towards Russia began ...

    No control, no cuts !!! Three anchors to them in a hollow !!!
  24. 0
    6 July 2015 12: 43
    Forgive my ignorance, but as far as I know from the Russian Federation, cruise missiles are only sea and air based, and I only heard about land missiles from India and China ...
  25. +3
    6 July 2015 12: 44
    Send them an official note. The main thing to remember is that "poxer" is written together, and "poxer" is written separately.
  26. 0
    6 July 2015 12: 48
    Do you see the gopher? ”These observers at one time at the Votkinsk plant were fed up.
  27. 0
    6 July 2015 12: 50
    It is necessary to send Psaku to Peskov’s place !!! RIAC? I didn’t hear !!! wassat
  28. +1
    6 July 2015 12: 52
    In terms of the "ability" to present, the Americans can trace the same Down's thinking as the Ukrainians. Well, what is the pop, so is the parish!
  29. 0
    6 July 2015 12: 57
    We are talking about a ground-based cruise missile with a range of 500 to 5500 km. We are sure that the Russian leadership knows which rocket we have in mind


    So she flew to America! Like a plywood sheet over Paris. Only Obama's curls fluttered.
  30. +1
    6 July 2015 13: 04
    Give them a hand now so they grab at the elbow. And our answer to them with the right hand on the elbow, you send ....
  31. 0
    6 July 2015 13: 05
    Write them an answer, put it in a capsule, put the capsule in the R-500 gorovka ... And send them great greetings from Iskander-M by air mail!
  32. 0
    6 July 2015 13: 06
    If even the Russian leadership knows what kind of missile you have in mind, then you will decide and indicate exactly what you are hinting at, and that’s all the talk, it’s written on the pitchfork with water.
  33. 0
    6 July 2015 13: 11
    PSACISM in action! hi
  34. +1
    6 July 2015 13: 18
    Those. it turns out that they don’t really know what, but they are indignant! Well, tell me, how can one talk and negotiate with such people in general? This is complete insanity fool
  35. +3
    6 July 2015 13: 19
    As always. "She came up with it herself, she was offended, she quarreled, she made up herself." Behaving like a hysterical woman with PMS. "You are violating, we know! But we cannot prove it ... Once you are violating, you will prove your violations, and along the way, give all yours to us." Well, just some nonsense.
  36. 0
    6 July 2015 13: 34
    Miss Psaki. No really! She carried nonsense, but it was amusing nonsense and she carried her kindly ...
  37. +1
    6 July 2015 13: 38
    Yes, you went in three letters, the Yankees! And ours must silently produce everything from what is required for the defense of the country. And send everyone away. We do not climb anywhere and in Mexico we do not arrange Maidan.
  38. +1
    6 July 2015 13: 51
    the first thing to do is to grind less with your tongue and promote it to our politicians and the military (generals and admirals). And then as one of them blurts out, so at least take out the dead man. And our "sworn friends" only need this. On the basis of such statements, they build their "claims".

    Quote: maxcor1974
    Land-based SMD missiles are needed like air. But our "friends" should learn about them after their deployment. So that not one mouse squeaks

    And in return to get the same thing at our borders? We will not reach Washington with a medium-range missile, but they are even faster from the Baltic States to Moscow and St. Petersburg than Pershing from Germany once did.

    Quote: APASUS
    This is not about missiles, if you do not understand. Under the pretext of non-compliance with the INF Treaty, the Americans are trying to slam our missile industry

    Well, about slamming - it’s said too much, but putting it under power control is yes

    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    Russia needs to blame the United States for deploying nuclear bombs in Europe,

    So it’s not forbidden, what to blame?

    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    And to establish a nuclear warhead on the calibers, let the Warsaw and halibuts around Europe cut circles.

    But this is a DIRECT violation on our part. And who will be better off from this? Do we have many running these boats? In addition, if they can apply, only through TA. And this means that there will be very few 2-4 such missiles, no more.
    And our "sworn friends" VSHPU on nuclear boats, which will be more than we have ... And they will be able to release their BC much faster
    So NOT EXIT


    Quote: Alexey M
    In general, get out of all the agreements altogether and let them sit.

    I'm afraid that we will have to do this, not them. Their missiles will be minutes away from our capital, not ours from Washington

    Quote: Gogia
    We are talking about the proposed planning and maneuvering warhead for Iskander

    Fresh thought. It would be interesting to look at the planning and maneuvering Iskander warhead
    1. 0
      6 July 2015 14: 08
      Quote: Old26
      And this means that there will be very few 2-4 such missiles, no more.
      And our "sworn friends" VSHPU on nuclear boats, which will be more than we have ... And they will be able to release their BC much faster

      Why 2-4. On Varshavyanki there can be only: 18 torpedoes on racks + 6 in torpedo tubes, total 24 units.
  39. 0
    6 July 2015 14: 07
    Quote: Old26
    So it’s not forbidden, what to blame?

    Violation of the UN agreement that prohibits the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The United States not only places it in Europe, but also trains the pilot of countries that do not have nuclear weapons in use.
  40. +1
    6 July 2015 14: 48
    Divorce in the Anglo-Saxon scenario, of course, will not work. But for some reason, we always somehow justify ourselves on the audacity of the impudent Americans. How much thunder does it take to start being baptized?
  41. +2
    6 July 2015 15: 00
    Let them present evidence. And then as a woman, like "You yourself must understand why I am angry with you." They go to the stump with such statements, especially with a desire to control.
  42. +1
    6 July 2015 15: 32
    Quote: aleks 62
    ... Russia will have to work hard to produce enough medium-range missiles, given that now the plants are engaged in the production of strategic missiles and are 100% loaded .....

    Not just [b] plants [/ b], but [b] plant [/ b]

    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    Why 2-4. On Varshavyanki there can be only: 18 torpedoes on racks + 6 in torpedo tubes, total 24 units.

    And are you going to replace all of them with cruise missiles? See how many submarines are usually in the missile torpedo ammunition. Although this is their profile weapon

    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    Violation of the UN agreement that prohibits the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The United States not only places it in Europe, but also trains the pilot of countries that do not have nuclear weapons in use.

    Distribution, for that matter, implies transferring to the other side either the ammunition and its components, or technologies for creating such ammunition, or transferring control to the other side, while retaining the right of veto on the use of these weapons. Training has never been in the category of nuclear weapons proliferation. We likewise trained our ATS allies in the use of weapons of mass destruction, including and nuclear. However, this was not considered b] proliferation [/ b] of nuclear weapons
  43. 0
    6 July 2015 15: 38
    It’s interesting, and if you run it from the river, the sweat serves ground-based or not laughing
  44. 0
    6 July 2015 15: 39
    Everything is fine - we smile and wave - like the penguins of Madagascar - the main thing is that in fact these missiles are in order, and it is a matter of time to recognize the EBN and the traitors marked with traitors.
  45. 0
    6 July 2015 16: 47
    interesting logic: I don’t know what it looks like, what it is intended for, but we don’t need it because something is there, somewhere the Americans violate their repertoire
  46. +1
    6 July 2015 18: 17
    Quote: ArhipenkoAndrey
    What for? Nuclear bombs on planes in Europe just fall within a short range, to prove that the states first violated and actually begin to develop this system and even do not need to place anyone anywhere, these bastards will begin to agree.

    If you don’t understand what you are writing, I’ll try to explain. The agreement was called AGREEMENT ABOUT ROCKETS LESS AND MIDDLE RANGE.
    О ROCKETS. Moreover, land-based, and not sea or air. And how aircraft bombs violate this agreement is probably known only to you
  47. +1
    7 July 2015 00: 54
    Quote: bmv04636
    It’s interesting, and if you run it from the river, the sweat serves ground-based or not

    Interest Ask.
    If we are talking about ballistic missiles, then they can be placed on boats that are not submarines only on condition that their range is not more than 600 km. If we are talking about winged, they can be placed exclusively on warships, missile boats and submarines. And the range here is not limited. Voprso can stand if a missile having a range of over 500 km begins to be used on ground installations. Then this is a violation of the contract. And the mistakes and PR of our politicians and admirals is precisely in this