Military Review

"The war may begin in the summer"

102
"The war may begin in the summer"


Does Russia have the resources for a global confrontation with the North Atlantic Alliance?

Messages about the possible beginning of an armed global confrontation appear in the media with varying degrees of intensity. Another round of talk on the topic of the Third World War provoked Twitter posting by former leading analyst of the US National Security Agency John Schindler. The expert, citing a high-ranking NATO general, predicted that this summer the North Atlantic Alliance would be in a state of war "and, if lucky, it will not be nuclear."

In the appendix to Schindler's tweet, we can quote the recent statement by billionaire George Soros, who suggested that the world will plunge into the abyss of the Third World War due to a potential economic collapse in the PRC. According to the famous investor, Beijing will need an external threat to rally impoverished residents. In the global confrontation, as Soros argues, Russia will become an ally of the Middle Kingdom, and the United States will be the adversary.

Inside China itself also does not exclude the possibility of the Third World War. The leading newspaper, "Renmin jibao" in September last year, citing Professor Han Xudong, wrote that Beijing needed to prepare for an armed conflict that would erupt between the US and Russia because of the Ukrainian crisis.

Passions are also fueling American media, which regularly publish notes about the threat that comes from the Russian Federation and its likely military ally, the PRC. National Interest magazine editor James Cardin believes that the Russophobic campaign unleashed by journalists marks the revival of McCarthyism, which suggested a tough fight with any manifestation of sympathy for the USSR.

Now most of the information arrows, as Cardin noted, are flying towards Russia, which has embarked on an independent foreign policy and strengthening the power of the armed forces.

Russia is surrounded


The geopolitical situation, which is developing near the western borders of the Russian Federation, has deteriorated noticeably in recent years. In February, 2014, our country received at the border a large, aggressive, unstable and unpredictable state represented by Ukraine. Attempts to destabilize the political situation in a similar way are now being observed in neighboring Belarus.

Last week, the efforts of Kiev and Chisinau in the blockade turned out to be a group of Russian troops in Transnistria. At the same time, as the “Russian Planet” wrote, the unrecognized republic is in an extremely difficult economic situation and fears of escalating violence.

After Ukraine, another explosion in Europe is likely to occur in the Balkans. Macedonia, which was attacked by Albanian militants, is in acute political crisis. The opposition sabotages the work of the authorities and demands the resignation of the government. At the same time, the West exerts enormous diplomatic pressure on Serbia, which refused to impose anti-Russian sanctions.

Military expert, candidate historical Sci. Vadim Solovyov believes that Russia is once again confronting the whole world and it has no serious allies. “True, in Soviet times the situation was similar: there were only nominal allies and it would have been rash to rely on them in the event of a serious conflict,” the scientist stated.

However, despite the unfavorable conditions near our borders, experts are convinced that Russia will be able to withstand the global confrontation with the West. Also, military analysts are confident that there are no reasons for the start of large-scale hostilities now.

Permanent confrontation

Vadim Solovyov believes that the confrontation with NATO, which began in the times of the Soviet Union, never really ended. Nevertheless, the scientist believes that now there are no prerequisites, conditions and critical reasons for going all-in and using nuclear weapons. weapon.

According to Solovyov, the global war will certainly turn into a long and exhausting confrontation. In this regard, the expert admits the possibility of local, short-term conflicts, the solution of which will quickly flow into the political mainstream. “As the Prussian officer Clausewitz said, war is the continuation of politics,” said the scientist.

Vice President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Doctor of Military Sciences Konstantin Sivkov, in an interview with the observer of the Russian Planet, expressed the conviction that now NATO has no real reason to unleash hostilities against Moscow. “Russia has both military and economic opportunities to counter NATO forces. But the main thing is that Russia possesses nuclear weapons and can, if necessary, use them. This circumstance is alarming. America has never fought on its territory and the likelihood of a nuclear attack is very frightening, ”said Sivkov.

According to the analyst, the war will not happen, if only because NATO forces will need about three months to fully mobilize. “At best, the alliance will be ready for war only by September,” said Sivkov.

The devil is not so terrible as he is painted

The NATO forces, which include the 28 states, have about 4 million people in their ranks. Currently, in connection with the “Russian aggression”, the leadership of the alliance plans to increase its military presence in Eastern Europe. There is also the possibility of expanding the deployment of US missile defense elements near the borders of the Russian Federation.


Joint exercises of the Georgian and American military on the base in Vaziani in Georgia. Photo: Shakh Aivazov / AP


Despite the seeming power of the western “partners,” experts urge not to exaggerate the opportunities that the military-political bloc hostile to the Russian Federation has. “The armed forces of NATO are not as strong and steadfast as they seem. It does not make sense to analyze the combat power of the alliance as a whole, because the main role in it is played by the United States, ”said Vadim Solovyov.

The military analyst recalled that the European members of the alliance, acting with an eye on Washington, have not yet figured out how much to invest in the army and how to develop it. According to the scientist, Europeans are not motivated to invest in their armed forces. "Fulfillment of combat missions will still fall on the shoulders of the American army, and the rest of NATO will only be in the wings," explained Solovyov.

Konstantin Sivkov agrees with his colleague. “NATO has a nominal advantage in numbers and armaments, however, the level of combat readiness of military units is only 20%,” said the vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems.

Sivkov stated that the military spending of the member countries of the alliance is quite serious, but recently they have been reduced. “Military spending increased only Russia, China and North Korea. The NATO leadership in connection with the conflict in Ukraine is trying unsuccessfully to stimulate governments to increase defense budgets, ”said the expert.

“The supremacy of the alliance is not as great as is customary. Now NATO's efforts are focused mainly on solving problems of an economic, rather than a military nature. We see that NATO cannot cope even with pirates. Therefore, I believe that the alliance is not ready for a large-scale war, ”the scientist said.

Russia clears up Serdyukov's mistakes

In recent years, the Russian authorities have begun to pay great attention to the state of the military-industrial complex and the combat capability of the armed forces. Such a policy was expressed in a large-scale modernization and rearmament of the Russian army, the main stage of which will be completed by 2020 year. However, now the Russian military can boast of the arrival of new types of equipment and weapons.

Vice President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Doctor of Military Sciences Konstantin Sivkov believes that with the arrival of Sergei Shoigu, the armed forces of the Russian Federation really began to come in order. According to the expert, the main mistakes in the last five years were made under the leadership of Anatoly Serdyukov.

Sivkov attributed the disbandment to the mistakes of the ex-minister tank divisions, the destruction of the military education system, the elimination of the aircraft basing system. The problems that arose due to Serdyukov's unprofessionalism are now being solved by Shoigu.

Speaking of successes, Sivkov stressed that Russia has eliminated the backlog of weapons in the field of NATO. At the same time, some products of the domestic defense industry, such as air defense systems (C-300, C-400, C-500), tanks and aircraft, are significantly superior to their foreign counterparts.

Vadim Soloviev adheres to a similar point of view. The expert urged to continue efforts to form a contract army and modernize electronic equipment used by the armed forces. The main problem of military construction scientist called corruption.

“The fight against it is underway, but not intensively enough. The example of Vasilyeva and Serdyukov once again confirms this. There are forces in our country that can stifle financial scandals, ”stated Solovyov. In this regard, the expert called for the establishment of the strictest control over the expenditure of budgetary funds.
Author:
Originator:
http://rusplt.ru/world/voyna-mojet-nachatsya-uje-letom-17241.html
102 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Baikonur
    Baikonur 29 May 2015 18: 02
    +18
    Yes, and I have no doubt! At the expense of the warriors. Have to! Nits will not leave behind! Lord, Help, Protect Truth and Justice! Do not be afraid, people, Russians! SO NECESSARY!
    1. Victor the Great
      Victor the Great 29 May 2015 18: 08
      -15
      Strange, for some reason I do not even doubt that there will be no big war, it is simply not beneficial to anyone.
      You see, money and interests rule this world. Why should the West unleash a conflict if everything is excellent with the economy?
      Russia’s war, in which there is no a priori chance of victory, is all the more unnecessary.
      1. Hairy Siberian
        Hairy Siberian 29 May 2015 18: 21
        +24
        War between nuclear powers is impossible. Most likely they will loosen from the inside.
        1. Victor the Great
          Victor the Great 29 May 2015 18: 28
          +3
          That's what I'm talking about. For it will be conducted according to the principle "the whole world is in dust", i.e. war without the participation of the army.
          1. sent-onere
            sent-onere 29 May 2015 19: 26
            +4
            Quote: Victor the Great
            That's what I'm talking about. For it will be conducted according to the principle "the whole world is in dust", i.e. war without the participation of the army.




            Yes, enough horror to catch up, if the war will be - then in the current - information mode, save your nerves for currency jumps and new swamps.
            1. Talgat
              Talgat 29 May 2015 21: 04
              +2
              Quote: sent-onere
              Yes, enough horror to catch up, if the war will be - then in the current - information mode, save your nerves for currency jumps and new swamps.


              Once again I agree with you Saint Onere!

              Nuclear deterrence will prevent aggressors from openly attacking either Russia or China or their close allies

              Second, even if their missile defense is successful and there is hope for a "quick disarming strike" so that later the remnants of strategic nuclear forces can be shot down with their missile defense - both Russia and China have clearly shown what will happen in case of escalation and preparation for aggression - the two powers are very likely to simply a military alliance is already "hanging on the edge"

              So for now, the aggressors will have to be content with petty dirty tricks - but from all sides - from the Pacific Ocean to Europe and the Middle East
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 29 May 2015 21: 10
                +3
                Quote: Talgat

                Nuclear deterrence will prevent aggressors from openly attacking either Russia or China or their close allies

                unfortunately only to certain limits, in the end there were no use of chemical weapons in the Second World War, although it was not the ban that dominated, but the fear to get an answer, but without it the people were crushed with pleasure
              2. erema-erema
                erema-erema 29 May 2015 23: 44
                +3
                What I don't like about this is that they do "small" dirty tricks, and we clean up. Maybe it's time to change tactics. The best defense is offense.
                1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                  Vasilenko Vladimir 30 May 2015 07: 29
                  +1
                  Quote: erema-erema
                  The best way of defense is attack.

                  better air defense our tanks at their airfields? laughing
          2. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 29 May 2015 21: 00
            +2
            Quote: Victor the Great
            those. war without the participation of the army.

            it is debatable when in an earthquake-prone region for too long there is no earthquake it is very, very bad it will be all one, but much stronger
        2. Babr
          Babr 29 May 2015 18: 44
          +24
          "Russia surrounded"
          And not only from the outside, but also from the inside.
          "Russia is clearing up Serdyukov's mistakes"
          Forever switchman is to blame.
          Who set it up? Why put it?
          If Taburetkin is a random person, as Minister of Defense, does the government, and the country in general, are random?
          Taburetkin is a bone that people threw.
          Nibble.
          1. Victor the Great
            Victor the Great 29 May 2015 18: 55
            +2
            Quote: Babr
            ... this is a bone thrown to the people.
            Nibble.

            Well said, I will try to remember;)
        3. ATATA
          ATATA 29 May 2015 19: 54
          +6
          Quote: Hairy Siberian
          War between nuclear powers is impossible. Most likely they will loosen from the inside.

          What a naive Chukchi young man you are! smile hi
          War is horror from horrors, it is the worst crime. I would like to invent a substance or machine of such destructive power that any war at all would become impossible.
          Alfred Bernhard Nobel - Swedish chemist, engineer, inventor of dynamite.

          Sorry if that. hi
          1. Hairy Siberian
            Hairy Siberian 29 May 2015 20: 22
            +2
            Quote: ATATA
            What a naive Chukchi young man you are!
            War is horror from horrors, it is the worst crime. I would like to invent a substance or machine of such destructive power that any war at all would become impossible.
            Alfred Bernhard Nobel - Swedish chemist, engineer, inventor of dynamite.

            You just struck me as someone else’s mentality. The wise Nenets grandfather. hi
        4. Nick
          Nick 29 May 2015 20: 35
          +2
          Quote: Hairy Siberian
          War between nuclear powers is impossible. Most likely they will loosen from the inside.

          Well, repeating the fate of Ukraine is also not comme il faut.
        5. Drmadfisher
          Drmadfisher 30 May 2015 02: 45
          0
          war is possible, but only in the third territory
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 29 May 2015 18: 28
        +11
        Quote: Victor the Great
        You see, money and interests rule this world. Why should the West unleash a conflict if everything is excellent with the economy?

        In the West, namely the USA, Russia, in an alliance with India and China, is painfully stepping on its tail. Moreover, more and more money is leaving like sand from the hands of amers, and they really don’t like it. It’s because the USA understands that in years 10 they will lose everything its power, hegemony and authority, as well as their economy with such debts will not last long in the world. And there the collapse of the economy, hyperinflation and further on the list.
        Therefore, they will bite their teeth and claw for the old way of the world, if only to defend the unipolarity of the world. And at the same time, in the West, the presence of a nuclear arsenal in China, India and Russia, as a deterrent, is not particularly taken into account in this ever-increasing hysteria .And knowing that at the head of the Anglo-Saxon civilization are primarily TORGASHI, I think the Third World War should also be considered seriously, as one of the ways of developing the near future.
      3. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 29 May 2015 20: 58
        +6
        Quote: Victor the Great
        For some reason I don’t even doubt that there will be no big war, it is simply not beneficial to anyone.

        here is just a big question
        I would say that it is beneficial to many - with the United States, it is clear that debt cancellation and boosting its own economy, Europe also has its benefits in a possible war, the Yalta world collapsed is a fait accompli in Europe, a mass of territorial claims that are not resolvable in a peaceful way the Germans are surely eager for revenge and deliverance from American guardianship, it is not strange that war is also beneficial for Russia in the first place with the same territorial issues, plus the solution of internal problems, the only one who definitely does not win but rather lose is China
        The only thing that stops all this byga is nuclear weapons, but I'm not sure for a long time.
        there was no major military conflict that could have discarded the accumulated contradictions for too long, before Europe fought once every 20-30 years
        1. aksakal
          aksakal 30 May 2015 00: 26
          +7
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          And there the collapse of the economy, hyperinflation and further on the list.
          - I agree with the Nexus and Vasilenko.
          The collapse of the US economy is 100% death. The world in the United States is based on the SATURATED poverty of blacks and people of color. Yes, poverty, but it's well-fed - the Afro-American has something to devour and even have something to ride, albeit an old broken-down Buick. If this will not happen, something will begin that will not even be dreamed of in a nightmare. By the way, the civilized West called Soviet people savages, liberals - and even worse, but even in the hungry 90s, with the collapse of the USSR, the degree of interethnic contradictions in the countries of the former USSR did not exceed the critical mark, the very one behind which the terrible massacre of all against everyone. And in the "civilized" States such a massacre will begin. The West is civilized, where are we savages before it laughing
          In contrast to this scenario, the unleashing of a war by the West against Russia gives the unleashing war at least some chance of survival. Well, in any case, the West thinks so that there are some chances to win and repeat the wonderful enrichment, as happened with the United States in the second MV. We are wink we know that the West has no chance of winning even without the use of nuclear weapons. The Anglo-Saxons have loved to fight all their lives according to the principle "I kill you, but you don't!" The trick is that such a principle of war will not fail against Russia - Russia has something to shoot down "tomahawks" with, and it has its own "Tomahawks" no worse. This means that you will have to go into close military contact, and with this the Anglo-Saxon warrior is very bad.
          Therefore, the West has little choice - either to die without a chance at all in a terrible internal interracial war, or to try to defeat Russia - if the Chubais-Serdyukovs come to power in Russia, which cannot be ruled out, there is even a chance to win.
          So war is quite likely. They fought in the presence of nuclear weapons in Vietnam and in Korea (during the war in Korea, the United States had nuclear weapons), and nothing. And here the brave black marines are called soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and the Russian soldiers are called militia of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and forward and with a song. Both the USA and Russia are, as it were, not at work. The fact that the VSN and AFU had a lot of troops became stronger, the quantity and quality of weapons jumped up, and the level of organization of military operations itself became an order of magnitude higher - this is the third matter, all the same, Russia and the USA are out of business. In such a war, there will hardly be any winners, there will be a sort of tyagomotin with varying success, for neither side will risk daring to develop any local success into global success. But even such a scenario is fatal for the West - after all, such a war will not enrich it, and therefore, be an internal racial slaughter. In any case, time works for Russia.
        2. Victor the Great
          Victor the Great 30 May 2015 00: 30
          -7
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          I would say that it is beneficial to many - ....

          Developing countries have always started wars with great ambitions, and now let's see all the options:
          -USA, 30-year-old hegemon, which is already more than anything and completely satisfied. On the contrary, the presence of adversaries like Russia and China is beneficial to them in order to support the huge army and navy in battle
          -EU, well, not the mentality of modern Europeans to start a big war, many refused the army at all, the largest have it only on paper (more precisely, it’s simply not combat ready) and in case of war I wouldn’t be afraid of them.
          -Russia, well, not in that condition now Russia and our army with the fleet would start a big war.
          -China, a country with great ambitions and needs for territory and resources, which in the future (some 15-20 years from now) will be fully suitable for the role of aggressor in a big war, BUT now Celestial Empire still has a weak army tied to other people's technologies and without your experience.
          1. N-SKiy
            N-SKiy 30 May 2015 05: 49
            0
            Why are you so not literate and naive. You are by no means a black blogger or just a schoolboy
            1. Victor the Great
              Victor the Great 30 May 2015 07: 07
              0
              Quote: N-SKiy
              Why are you so not literate and naive. You are by no means a black blogger or just a schoolboy


              No, not a blogger, and no longer a schoolboy, just a sane person who knows firsthand the real combat effectiveness of our army.
              ...
              But it would not hurt you to learn the Russian language, albeit from the EU, but sit still on the domestic site ...
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 30 May 2015 07: 59
                +1
                Quote: Victor the Great
                But it would not hurt you to learn the Russian language

                and you would have a story when they switch to spelling it means the absence of arguments
                1. Victor the Great
                  Victor the Great 30 May 2015 14: 19
                  -2
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  and you would have a story when they switch to spelling it means the absence of arguments

                  And it would not hurt you to read that rudeness that I will comment on, maybe even then you will understand that they screwed up ...
                  1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                    Vasilenko Vladimir 30 May 2015 14: 27
                    -1
                    Developing countries have always started wars with great ambitions.
                    I commented on this is not knowledge of historical realities, and now if you consider yourself right, give historical examples for the last 300-400 years
                    1. Victor the Great
                      Victor the Great 30 May 2015 14: 38
                      -1
                      No, you commented on my comments about spelling mistakes to the person who called me a schoolboy, so here you are with your failed psychoanalysis about the absence of arguments screwed up-FACT ...
                      But so be it, I will answer your question:
                      -France, before Napoleon, quite an average state, needed new territories for economic growth and satisfaction of political influence
                      -1MV, Kaiser Germany was united not so long ago, but the world, raw material sources, and colonies were already divided, which forced a big war to begin.
                      -2MV, a similar situation as with 1MV.
                      1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Vasilenko Vladimir 30 May 2015 14: 50
                        -1
                        I told you about not knowing history, this is a fact
                        Quote: Victor the Great
                        -1MV, Kaiser Germany was united not so long ago, but the world, raw material sources, and colonies were already divided, which forced a big war to begin.

                        Well, I say no knowledge of history at what complete
                        in the first WW1 it was not only the Germans who started this pan-European "desire" and the preparation for it began almost in the 19th century

                        the second world problem is the same as now, with almost 100% coincidence, there was not so much a desire to capture new territories as a need to establish a new order after the collapse of the Versailles world

                        on your three extremely inaccurate calculations, I can bring a lot of European major conflicts that ruin your postulate to the smithereens
                      2. Victor the Great
                        Victor the Great 30 May 2015 15: 32
                        -2
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Well, I say no knowledge of history at what complete
                        in the first WW1 it was not only the Germans who started this pan-European "desire" and the preparation for it began almost in the 19th century

                        the second world problem is the same as now, with almost 100% coincidence, there was not so much a desire to capture new territories as a need to establish a new order after the collapse of the Versailles world

                        on your three extremely inaccurate calculations, I can bring a lot of European major conflicts that ruin your postulate to the smithereens

                        Preparations for war matured immediately after the unification of Germany, and that was back in the XNUMXth century.
                        And the rest, just the same, you demonstrate ignorance of history, and complete !!!
                        If you add to this also wild inattention, prejudice of opinion and, possibly, deceit, this explains your point of view ...
                2. MIKHALYCH1
                  MIKHALYCH1 30 May 2015 14: 30
                  0
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  Quote: Victor the Great
                  But it would not hurt you to learn the Russian language

                  and you would have a story when they switch to spelling it means the absence of arguments

                  They love it ..! bully They are always looking for "painful" points ...
                  1. Victor the Great
                    Victor the Great 30 May 2015 14: 40
                    0
                    Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
                    They love it ..! They are always looking for "painful" points ...

                    And what have you lost here ??? If you do bad things with your own eyes, I poke a comment, to which I replied with a remark
                    Quote: N-SKiy
                    Why are you so not literate and naive. You are by no means a black blogger or just a schoolboy


                    Aren't you ashamed after that, or is your conscience beyond the pink glasses breaking through?
                    1. MIKHALYCH1
                      MIKHALYCH1 30 May 2015 14: 52
                      0
                      Quote: Victor the Great
                      And what have you lost here ??? If you do bad things with your own eyes, I poke a comment, to which I replied with a remark

                      I’m just watching .. hi And you don’t need to get angry here ..!
                      1. Victor the Great
                        Victor the Great 30 May 2015 15: 34
                        0
                        You are watching too biasedly, and even chose the "dark side of power" ... ah, not good No.
              2. EGOrkka
                EGOrkka 30 May 2015 14: 57
                0
                Nobody here gave any obligations to anyone! Did Totenia teach Stoli? , or "whistling"? There are brains, argue with brains, but if your brain does not, your manuals will not help!
          2. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 30 May 2015 07: 29
            +1
            Quote: Victor the Great
            Developing countries have always started wars with great ambitions.

            to say the least
            wars begin not because the army is big or scarlet, strong or weak, but because the accumulated contradictions or unmet interests cannot be solved in another way
            Quote: Victor the Great
            , for the largest, it is available only on paper (more precisely, it is simply not combat ready) and in case of war I would not be afraid of them.

            to begin with, you have accurate data on the combat effectiveness of the Jewish armies, you are an expert in the field of armaments, I think not
            Quote: Victor the Great
            Russia, well, not in that condition, now Russia and our army with the fleet are about to start a big war.

            and Russia doesn’t need to start, it feels like you don’t know history (how the wars started), you don’t know how to analyze. Russia can simply be put in a situation where any action would mean war or loss of independence
            Quote: Victor the Great
            -China, a country with great ambitions and needs for territory and resources, which in the future

            Sorry, have you read hromchikhin ?!
            for china war, a great war is a collapse.
            their entire economy lives off trade termination of trade means a complete collapse in China a lot of internal hidden and not very conflicts
            1. Victor the Great
              Victor the Great 30 May 2015 14: 26
              0
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              to say the least

              Someone stuttered about the arguments ... well, I'm waiting for them.
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              to begin with, you have accurate data on the combat effectiveness of the Jewish armies, you are an expert in the field of armaments, I think not

              Not a specialist, but wrote a specialist opinion.
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              and Russia doesn’t need to start, it feels like you don’t know history (how the wars started), you don’t know how to analyze. Russia can simply be put in a situation where any action would mean war or loss of independence

              Well, yes ... the Georgian and Ukrainian conflicts started on their own, or with the help of Zaokien’s friends ... and Russia was forced to get involved, although STOP. Russia has nothing to do with it ... And the soldiers there are also not Russian dying.
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              for china war, a great war is a collapse.

              how to know how to know. China, even in the USSR, was able to Daman squeeze ...
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 30 May 2015 15: 26
                0
                Quote: Victor the Great
                Not a specialist, but wrote a specialist opinion.

                whom? give a full quote
                Quote: Victor the Great
                Well, yes ... the Georgian and Ukrainian conflicts started on their own, or with the help of Zaokien’s friends ... and Russia was forced to get involved, although STOP. Russia has nothing to do with it ... And the soldiers there are also not Russian dying.

                you contradict yourself
                Quote: Victor the Great
                how to know how to know. China, even in the USSR, was able to Daman squeeze ...

                Firstly, Domansky is not a peninsula, but an island
                secondly, it is not necessary to compare round with white and border conflicts with a full-scale war
      4. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 30 May 2015 04: 33
        +1
        Quote: Victor the Great
        You see, they rule this world

        There is one interesting video (I feel like I'm bored) pure fantasy and conspiracy theories however, maybe this ...
        1. Babr
          Babr 30 May 2015 05: 00
          +3
          I started to watch. But I want to share my principles.
          Believe everything and don’t believe anything.
          Passed by scooped up information, put it on the shelf, but do not forget.
          Found a similar one, compare. So you get to the truth. hi
          What about the cons? This is anger, more likely to yourself that you can’t convey your position
      5. Black_PR
        Black_PR 30 May 2015 06: 29
        -1
        Quote: Victor the Great
        Strange, for some reason I do not even doubt that there will be no big war, it is simply not beneficial to anyone.
        You see, money and interests rule this world. Why should the West unleash a conflict if everything is excellent with the economy?
        Russia’s war, in which there is no a priori chance of victory, is all the more unnecessary.


        They have far from excellent economics !!! And the best way to improve things is a small victorious war! Debts are written off, military orders revitalize the economy, jobs +, etc. etc. This was not the first time.
      6. larand
        larand 30 May 2015 07: 23
        +1
        Quote: Victor the Great
        Strange, for some reason I do not even doubt that there will be no big war, it is simply not beneficial to anyone.

        The current human civilization, accompanied by endless, bloody wars, based on the rule of law, strong and rich in relations between people and between countries will destroy itself. And this will be a cleansing for the planet that we have spoiled.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Victor the Great
          Victor the Great 30 May 2015 14: 31
          0
          Quote: larand
          The current human civilization, accompanied by endless, bloody wars, based on the rule of law, strong and rich in relations between people and between countries will destroy itself. And this will be a cleansing for the planet that we have spoiled.


          Yes, history consists of war and the endless thirst for the dominance of the strong over the weak, BUT the big war in the modern interpretation is armageddon, i.e. there is no dominance of some over others, therefore the very button, which actually is not there, will not be pressed at least from the instinct of self-preservation.
    2. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 29 May 2015 18: 35
      +7
      Forgive me, but the Russians (understand) is biomass. But every nation of Russia, whether it be Slavs, Chechens, Ingush, Buryats ... Together, power, but do not call them in the manner of ebn! Already begins to feel sick ....
    3. Bayonet
      Bayonet 29 May 2015 19: 19
      +6
      Quote: Baikonur
      ! At the expense of the warriors. Have to! Do not be afraid, people, Russians! SO NECESSARY!

      Only durak is not afraid of war! fool
    4. sent-onere
      sent-onere 29 May 2015 19: 26
      +1
      There will not be a hot phase of a global war in which our country will have to participate, in the near future. The immediate prospect is 5 years +. The strongest armies in the world that do not fall apart at the first powerful blow are Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and only after them come the USA, NATO (which includes Turkey), etc. The largest, strongest propaganda in the world is - USA, England, Israel.
      1. bocsman
        bocsman 29 May 2015 22: 18
        +1
        I absolutely agree with you. I just want to add. There is no American army. no NATO army and other. There are bare statistics on the number of weapons, equipment, manpower, plus a weightless PR of alleged victories. And real politicians understand that it’s impossible to fight these pseudo armies, let alone defeat them! Well, there’s a bunch of little things: natural disasters, man-made disasters, a mess in VO and how the United States copes with this, it shows the real situation.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    5. nycsson
      nycsson 29 May 2015 19: 29
      +5
      Quote: Baikonur
      Lord, Help, Protect Truth and Justice!

      Hope for God, but don’t be ill yourself .....
      Quote: Baikonur
      Russians!

      Maybe Russians? Russians ..... wassat wassat wassat Ugh ..... disgusting .... half a year I did not write anything and still do not write as much. The contingent has not changed ......
      1. asiat_61
        asiat_61 30 May 2015 01: 14
        +2
        I agree, I’ve never been a Russian, and I won’t, only Russians. Who doesn’t like, damn you.
      2. a housewife
        a housewife 30 May 2015 03: 09
        0
        And the rest of the peoples of Russia, you will enumerate completely ?! By the way, the word "Russians" once arose in the sense of "Russians" - the peoples who were part of the principality of Moscow, except for the Russians themselves. hi
    6. jktu66
      jktu66 29 May 2015 19: 45
      +3
      Yes, and I have no doubt! At the expense of the warriors. Have to! Nits will not leave behind! Lord, Help, Protect Truth and Justice! Do not be afraid, people, Russians! SO NECESSARY!
      do you earn plus signs? laughing As I do not open a new article, so often the slogan (toast?) From Baikonur at the beginning of comments laughing
    7. Xergey
      Xergey 29 May 2015 19: 54
      +1
      You are causing a panic, everything will be fine with us, and there won’t be any war, let’s break it off like Gruzinov and everything will end.)
    8. ATATA
      ATATA 29 May 2015 20: 18
      +7
      Quote: Baikonur
      Yes, and I have no doubt! At the expense of the warriors. Have to! Nits will not leave behind! Lord, Help, Protect Truth and Justice! Do not be afraid, people, Russians! SO NECESSARY!

      Did you go online to the madhouse?
      Do you even realize that you are writing?
    9. andj61
      andj61 29 May 2015 20: 59
      +2
      Quote: Baikonur
      Don’t be afraid people Russians!

      Hello from the 90s from EBN!
    10. Alex kruglov
      Alex kruglov 30 May 2015 23: 31
      0
      In general, Putin's behavior in the situation with the LPR and DPR and the Minsk Agreement is now painfully reminiscent of Stalin's behavior in May 1941. He also ordered "not to give in to provocations" and stubbornly ignored the Wehrmacht's apparent preparations for an offensive against the USSR. Of course, no sane person WANTS war. BUT! This does not mean being unprepared for war if it is inevitable. Attempts to appease in a situation where the enemy is methodically preparing for an offensive (which is what Ukraine is doing now on the orders of the Pentagon in Donbass) will not lead to anything good. It’s as if at night in a gateway a punks with knives meet you, and you say to them with a broad smile: "guys, let's live together! Let's drink some tea!" They have their intentions written on their faces and their brute force will stop them. Putin, at the suggestion of the fifth column of traitors that surrounded him, made a colossal strategic mistake in August 2014 - it was necessary in no case to stop the successful offensive of the LPR and DPR armies, but to completely defeat the entire Donbass group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and liberate at least Mariupol and Kharkiv and leave to the ethnic eastern border of Ukraine - the line Sumy - Poltava - Dnepropetrovsk - Zaporozhye - Melitopol. Then the Russian Foreign Ministry would be firmly on its feet in all negotiations. And now. And now we will have to fight back again, again with a lot of blood - and so on until the lessons are learned.
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 31 May 2015 06: 42
        -1
        Quote: Alex Kruglov
        recalls Stalin's behavior in May 1941. He also ordered "not to give in to provocations" and stubbornly ignored the Wehrmacht's apparent preparations for an offensive against the USSR.

        read less liberal "historians" tea is not the 90s
      2. Stanislas
        Stanislas 31 May 2015 06: 51
        +1
        Quote: Alex Kruglov
        stubbornly ignored the explicit preparation of the Wehrmacht for an attack on the USSR
        We have been preparing since the beginning of the 30s. Therefore, industrialization was carried out "with anguish", they knew that there was little time.
  2. Grandfather bear
    Grandfather bear 29 May 2015 18: 03
    -10

    What a war, yes ?!
    It is necessary to hold one more game in the 17 year, huh? And then the war is not schmain, yes?
    1. tanit
      tanit 29 May 2015 18: 40
      +9
      Quote: Grandfather Bear
      It is necessary to hold one more game in the 17 year, huh? And then the war is not schmain, yes?

      No, chapionate, adnaka, dawning. In 2018.
      And how to remember, but in detail, all the dirt spilled on the Sochi Olympics. Victory, if the grandfathers bears have forgotten. laughing
      - then you begin to treat grandfathers bears, to put it mildly, with understanding and sympathy. laughing hi
  3. saag
    saag 29 May 2015 18: 07
    +17
    "... The scientist named corruption as the main problem of military development."

    This is a problem not only of military construction, but of the state in general
    1. jktu66
      jktu66 29 May 2015 19: 47
      +7
      This is a problem not only of military construction, but of the state in general
      And not only Russia
  4. svp67
    svp67 29 May 2015 18: 07
    +13
    An expert, citing a senior NATO general, predicted that this summer the Alliance would be at war "and, with luck, it would not be nuclear."
    And this in a couple of days ... I will not have time to prepare everything. Well, as always. The war is on the verge, and we are not ready ...

    who suggested that the world will plunge into the abyss of the Third World due to a potential economic collapse in China.
    Yes, where now without China ... he is everywhere
    1. MIKHALYCH1
      MIKHALYCH1 30 May 2015 14: 47
      0
      Quote: svp67
      Yes, where now without China ... he is everywhere

      Everywhere .. Smoked knows that!
  5. Cat man null
    Cat man null 29 May 2015 18: 08
    +9
    Damn .. IMHO, the author is very reminiscent of Igor Kabardin (Kibalchish) known here.

    The same style, the same .. um .. the level of information content of the material.

    Since the rules forbid swearing, I’ll finish that, perhaps.

    Article minus, sorry ... blah blah blah .. "is there life on Mars, is there life on Mars .." request
    1. Pula
      Pula 29 May 2015 21: 51
      +1
      Absolutely the right thing ... drinks Information conflict is a big stir on the Exchange, which is exactly what the "sores" need. Money-air-money. bully
  6. firevvs
    firevvs 29 May 2015 18: 10
    0
    Well, let them try to start, raked out!
  7. sir_obs
    sir_obs 29 May 2015 18: 10
    +15
    You just need to clearly and clearly convey to the people of America and Canada at the same time that you can’t sit out overseas. He will certainly fly to them and the survivors will envy the dead. A full life will end forever. And then for them, war is always only a huge profit, this time it will be completely different. And then the tanks are counting, the ships ... it rolls with the Papuans. Why do I need melee fists if there is a good club. Immediately and smack. Pretend to be a nose, and even think about it.
  8. Snake831
    Snake831 29 May 2015 18: 11
    +3
    It’s not for nothing that the p.indos.y troops and equipment are shoved into the Baltic states! What would it be empty for all of them. Creatures.
  9. For New Russia
    For New Russia 29 May 2015 18: 14
    +1
    Are the US ready? Shaw directly and not to the creatures?
    1. narval20
      narval20 29 May 2015 19: 00
      +2
      "Ready", but as always - by someone else's hands.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 29 May 2015 18: 15
    +3
    "and, with luck, it won't be nuclear."
    And if you're not lucky ?! Shitty "roulette", sorry, it never reaches the "cowboys" ... fool
  11. fif21
    fif21 29 May 2015 18: 16
    +7
    "and if you are lucky it (the war) will not be nuclear. And if you are not lucky? And if the blow is struck at Fashington, as the main instigator? And if World War 4 will be with cudgels? Now, not 14 or 41 years, the mattress will not sit out overseas." And their hands, in the war unleashed by them, they can warm only in the literal sense of the word.
  12. sgazeev
    sgazeev 29 May 2015 18: 21
    +3
    NATO is dusting, fingering. Of 28 countries, the USA will fight, and that is in doubt.
  13. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 May 2015 18: 21
    +5
    No one is going to fight in Europe. A certain percentage of marginals is available in any society, but to fight seriously! With these scary Russians! Who eat the liver of an enemy still alive before his eyes ... Let them be afraid, gay men. Do not reassure them.
    1. ALABAY45
      ALABAY45 29 May 2015 23: 09
      +2
      "Who eat the liver of a still living enemy before his eyes .."
      Sinking down with vodka and kicking a half-drunk bear in the ass, demanding to resume tinkling on the balalaika and shouting: "Well, where are these fucking nesting dolls ?!" I, Europe, didn’t scare me so much ?! Ah, here, sometimes I want to, BEFORE SHORTING !!!
  14. AIR ZNAK
    AIR ZNAK 29 May 2015 18: 22
    +3
    I don’t know what the third world will be, but the fourth will be using stone axes and spears
  15. Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 29 May 2015 18: 22
    +12
    Enough to stamp texts with provocative and panic headlines. Either fools or provocateurs. Such things are prepared in a different format.
  16. sania275
    sania275 29 May 2015 18: 28
    +8
    It is possible that in the 1941 year they did not want to believe in the beginning of the war, but to this day we celebrate the beginning of the war and celebrate its end. Alarming time.
    1. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 29 May 2015 19: 27
      +3
      Quote: sania275
      It is possible that in the 1941 year they did not want to believe in the beginning of the war, but to this day we celebrate the beginning of the war and celebrate its end. Alarming time.

      Then the format of the war was not catastrophic for the world's population. Even the fact of war and the presence of the Nazis did not mean the end of humanity.
      1. Alexdark
        Alexdark 30 May 2015 03: 04
        0
        I will tell you more. And the third and fourth, and the fifth, does not mean the end of humanity. This is unreal!
  17. 6 inches
    6 inches 29 May 2015 18: 29
    +1
    and what are they afraid of the mattress? they will be outside the aisles. will poison different Baltic and Polish mongrels. it’s clear that we’ll spread it, but the time and resources will be gone. so they will bite from different sides. the strategy of indirect actions is still valid ..
  18. Dima Čalevo
    Dima Čalevo 29 May 2015 18: 29
    +2
    Wow wow, tie it up with that kind of rhetoric and yellow headlines. No one in the West or in the East wants open war. The economy in our time is a weapon worse than the atomic bomb
    1. 6 inches
      6 inches 29 May 2015 18: 33
      +12
      You tell Gaddafi and Saddam ..
      1. Dima Čalevo
        Dima Čalevo 29 May 2015 20: 36
        +3
        they are not sociable
        1. 6 inches
          6 inches 29 May 2015 21: 09
          0
          therefore, they are silent ..
  19. Alexdark
    Alexdark 29 May 2015 18: 32
    -3
    There will be no war. Bullshit.
    1. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 29 May 2015 19: 30
      +3
      Quote: AlexDARK
      There will be no war. Bullshit.

      And what kind of war will not be? The war has long been going on.
      1. Alexdark
        Alexdark 30 May 2015 03: 03
        +1
        The one that everyone is used to. In any case, not soon and not because of dill. And your line, it's hard to say who did not write it, including me. A hackneyed and worn text, though correct. No need to be clever and write the same thing 200 times. You knew what I mean.
        It’s more convenient for them to use the old and proven method, run in dozens of states, including the USSR.
        Let's move on to another even more worn out text, which flashes here thirty times a day. "The army and the navy are our friends," but the methods are different, and the army will not help. The USSR did not help. And thanks to these methods, even the most "native" army can turn against you. Because she obeys the authority, any authority and any order. (Example of dill)
  20. kotev19
    kotev19 29 May 2015 18: 38
    0
    But it’s a pity, yet the world as it is is peace! We’ll have to make matches, candles, canned food, dry mushrooms and so on ... Well, these scum are ugroginov ... ki! EVERYTHING BECAUSE OF THEM !!! WILL LASERS FROM OUTER SPACE tickle them? hi
    1. 6 inches
      6 inches 29 May 2015 18: 40
      0
      how is it in sofia? warm? I’m going to go.
  21. tol100v
    tol100v 29 May 2015 18: 39
    +2
    Anticipating the imminent arrival of the white northern dog, the SGA can go to any meanness and provocation in order to unleash a full-scale war. But they understand that they can’t sit out in a puddle and try to foment only small regional messes. And as you know - from a spark, all the more uncontrollable, it can flare up that the whole world shudders! If you have time!
  22. atamankko
    atamankko 29 May 2015 18: 40
    +2
    Do not look for someone thicker
    everyone will get to the full.
  23. Check
    Check 29 May 2015 18: 41
    +1
    I’m already tired of these military forecasts, they’ve been scaring me for 10 years already. that's just in trousers a day only in the west, in Russia like everything in a fighting mood, even though no one wants a war.
  24. mihasik
    mihasik 29 May 2015 18: 42
    +3
    In our state there are forces that can wreak havoc on financial scandals, ”said Soloviev

    And can you name them?
  25. Colonel
    Colonel 29 May 2015 18: 45
    +2
    Especially touched:
    The mistakes of the ex-minister Sivkov included the disbandment of tank divisions, the destruction of the military education system, the elimination of the aircraft-based system.

    If these are "mistakes", then I am the Governor of Borneo.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. taram taramych
      taram taramych 29 May 2015 19: 24
      +1
      Congratulations mr
      Quote: colonel
      Governor of the island of Borneo
      ! I will not name the year, the Indian - Pakistani conflict, despite the presence of nuclear weapons, the latter were in the SJ position. It turned out that tank columns would be holed up the streets of Islamobad much earlier than missiles would be prepared for launch. Such are they, boxes laughing
    3. kuz363
      kuz363 29 May 2015 20: 54
      0
      I wonder why the scapegoat was chosen civilian? Wasn’t there specialists from the Defense Ministry, all sorts of institutes and academies, the president and the government, who determine the military doctrine?
  26. aleks3897
    aleks3897 29 May 2015 18: 47
    +1
    Let's go to war if Putin and the Motherland orders! We are not in the first! God is with Us, therefore, neither Napoleon nor Hitler broke us, but we will deal with NATO somehow with God's help!
    1. ivan.ru
      ivan.ru 29 May 2015 19: 15
      -6
      and why are you going to fight? for the homeland? so it will remain Russia. for Putin? so will some neputin. for a 100 meter yacht sechina? so there will be some nonsense on this yacht. and as you lived on the minimum wage, you will live. the only thing is that you will not send taxes to the tax inspectorate of the russian federation, but to tax usa. and that’s it. don't cheek up
      1. aleks3897
        aleks3897 29 May 2015 19: 41
        +4
        I will go to fight for my homeland! Why don’t you go?
        1. kuz363
          kuz363 29 May 2015 20: 50
          -8
          Previously, the Motherland was one and all were as if equal. And now you’ll go to fight for Chubais, Abramovich and other oligarchies? For soft-skinned and indecisive power in the form of Putin, Medvedev and others? Yes, they and all deputies will wait abroad for this war and will be the first to flee. Will you fight for the children of these citizens who are fattening abroad?
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 29 May 2015 21: 13
            +4
            Quote: kuz363
            . And now you’ll go to fight for Chubais, Abramovich and other oligarchies?

            I will not prove anything, just look and think
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 29 May 2015 19: 38
      +3
      Quote: aleks3897
      Let's go to war if Putin and the Motherland orders! We are not in the first! God is with Us, therefore, neither Napoleon nor Hitler broke us, but we will deal with NATO somehow with God's help!

      Yes, we won’t go anywhere to fight. If there is an attack of NATO or just America on Russia, then there will be a global thermonuclear strike on the aggressor. Why climb into radioactive hell, as in 1944? By the way, this radioactive good will be enough in Russia, because no modern air defense or missile defense system is capable of holding an almost simultaneous attack by 7000 - 11000 cruise missiles.
      Therefore, there will be no 3 World War.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 29 May 2015 20: 22
        -2
        Against all these cruise missiles, we have not only air defense and missile defense, but also the air force and electronic warfare troops.
        1. Aleksey_K
          Aleksey_K 29 May 2015 21: 25
          -1
          Quote: Vadim237
          Against all these cruise missiles, we have not only air defense and missile defense, but also the air force and electronic warfare troops.

          You are very mistaken. If Russia had the opportunity to withstand a global non-nuclear strike, then the Americans would not have such a plan. They are stopped from its use only by a retaliatory thermonuclear strike. In Russia, not all directions are still protected by radar systems. Putin is rapidly creating these detection systems, but we do not have enough missile defense systems and many areas and cities are not protected at all.
          1. mihasik
            mihasik 29 May 2015 22: 47
            +3
            Quote: Алексей_К
            Putin is rapidly creating these detection systems, but we do not have enough missile defense equipment and many areas and cities are not protected at all.

            Is there a strategy in the USA to destroy all the cities of the Russian Federation? So they do not have enough missiles for all the cities, 10 rackets for each city, it will not be enough. Don't let the fog here either. This whole strike is designed to destroy command strategic centers and industrial areas, and they are just very well protected. And nobody canceled "Perimeter" with Yellowstone. So here is maibi-meibi!)
            1. Aleksey_K
              Aleksey_K 30 May 2015 22: 41
              0
              Quote: mihasik
              All this blow is designed to destroy command strategic centers and industrial areas, and they are just very well protected.

              You probably read information about missile defense and air defense systems on the Internet. Each installation can accompany and shoot down only a few targets, but they don’t agree that there are only 300 rockets on the C-400, 4. On other systems, about the same. Though for being discovered and followed, there are only 4 missiles in total. Thus, in order to most likely destroy 11000 cruise missiles, you must have 22000 anti-aircraft missiles. This means that you must have 5500 installations on alert. 2000 also needs to be under repair or modernization. There are not so many systems in Russia (cars with missiles in 4 units) - 7500 machines. And they still need radar systems, command and communications. The figure is approaching 10000 special vehicles. I do not yet take into account possible combat losses that can reach 50%. There is no such quantity in Russia. You can reassure yourself as much as you want, but Putin is still building up and increasing their number of all the forces that the military industry is capable of.
          2. Vadim237
            Vadim237 30 May 2015 11: 19
            0
            And they don’t have any plan for delivering a global non-nuclear strike against Russia, and these subsonic cruise missiles can be shot down even from a helicopter, especially since they cannot launch these missiles, it will be necessary to bring the entire US fleet as close to our sea borders as possible - noticeably do not succeed.
    4. kuz363
      kuz363 29 May 2015 20: 51
      -4
      Well, go first and with God.
  27. NDR-791
    NDR-791 29 May 2015 18: 52
    0
    Another round of conversations on the theme of World War III
    Already the Fourth World War. First, missiles and the rest of weapons of mass destruction, and then, according to the classics, a "stone ax"
  28. prishelec
    prishelec 29 May 2015 18: 55
    +1
    There will be no nuclear war, and no nuclear war, at least for the next 15 years.
  29. alkur
    alkur 29 May 2015 18: 59
    +1
    Whoever comes with a sword will perish by the sword. Russia has a defensive position. If a war breaks out, it will be hard for all parties, but after defeating the foe, it is not worth giving away any more "liberated" lands, it is necessary to establish full control over the colonialists.
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 29 May 2015 19: 32
      +3
      Quote: alkur
      but after defeating the foe, it is not worth giving away more "liberated" lands

      What the hell is the earth, what a victory ??? ALL die, some immediately - others torment!
      This is understood by all civilized countries !!! But not all commentators ...
  30. narval20
    narval20 29 May 2015 19: 02
    +1
    "ready", but as always - by someone else's hands
  31. Noncombatant
    Noncombatant 29 May 2015 19: 08
    0
    Quote: Victor the Great
    Why should the West unleash a conflict if they already have an economy everything is excellent?

    We live on different planets, or just seemed to me "a slight touch of delirium"?
    1. ivan.ru
      ivan.ru 29 May 2015 19: 19
      -5
      Of course it seemed. they have an economy, but we have delirium
    2. The comment was deleted.
  32. Balamyt
    Balamyt 29 May 2015 19: 09
    +1
    Yes! Pancake! And then the Hero of Russia, the former Moscow Region, inherited, and shit! Our supreme happiness changed his mind in time, drove this theorist with a broom trash! Ow - whose jurisdiction!
  33. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 29 May 2015 19: 11
    +6
    "The war may begin in the summer"
    Always keep the gunpowder dry
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 29 May 2015 19: 32
      +2
      Quote: vc 72019
      Always keep the gunpowder dry

      Are you all crazy? The losses of the Great Patriotic War nervously smoke aside compared with losses after the collapse of the USSR !!!! fool
  34. aleks3897
    aleks3897 29 May 2015 19: 12
    -2
    NATO has soldiers who can only boogby, but they didn’t smell gunpowder and they don’t know how to dig trenches. The little guy from the village with a shovel will make horror at them that they will run away!
    NATO is the army of GEEV!
    1. ivan.ru
      ivan.ru 29 May 2015 19: 22
      +1
      do you understand what you said?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Bayonet
      Bayonet 29 May 2015 19: 43
      +1
      Quote: aleks3897
      NATO has soldiers who can only bogmbit, but they didn’t smell gunpowder and they don’t know how to dig trenches

      You can bomb the bunker, or you can try to shut up the embrasure with a heroic ass, this is someone who has enough mind or an amateur.
    4. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 29 May 2015 19: 49
      +2
      Quote: aleks3897
      NATO has soldiers who can only boogby, but they didn’t smell gunpowder and they don’t know how to dig trenches. The little guy from the village with a shovel will make horror at them that they will run away!
      NATO is the army of GEEV!

      Hatchery and underestimation of the enemy armies. In 1941, the Germans nearly captured Moscow. The Germans are very stubborn soldiers and very obedient, they carry out orders and do not retreat until they order. And since these are former Slavs, they fight to the last drop of blood. Only after Stalingrad in 1943 did the Soviet troops gradually begin to beat the Germans, and before that they only retreated or barely restrained the onslaught of these unchristians.
      Forgot your story?
  35. Tribuns
    Tribuns 29 May 2015 19: 35
    +3
    What is a simple and weak recipe proposed to enhance the power of the Russian army and navy: “There are forces in our state that can hide behind financial scandals," Solovyov stated. In this regard, the expert called for the strictest control over the expenditure of budgetary funds. "
    And, in our opinion, it is time to abandon the raw material liberal economy and liberal economists in favor of an industrial model of a mobilization economy, which will raise our industry and, accordingly, increase its ability to build up technically advanced military equipment ...
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 29 May 2015 22: 55
      0
      The mobilization economy in our country is possible only under state capitalism or socialism. That, with honest managers, almost the same thing.
  36. kotev19
    kotev19 29 May 2015 20: 40
    0
    You know that the white race in our world came from the Slavs, so nothing bad will happen! laughing
  37. kuz363
    kuz363 29 May 2015 20: 43
    -1
    Ordinary hatred. Even the presence of the S-300 or 400 will not ensure the interception of thousands of cruise missiles or just ballistic missiles. Yes, something will be able to intercept, but most will achieve the goals. And Russia in a conventional war will lose with little mobilization potential compared to the United States, not to mention Europe.
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 29 May 2015 21: 15
      0
      Quote: kuz363
      Russia in a conventional war will lose with little mobilization potential compared to the United States, not to mention Europe.

      explain in detail that there is a small "mobilization potential" in YOUR understanding
      1. Aleksey_K
        Aleksey_K 29 May 2015 21: 37
        +3
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        Quote: kuz363
        Russia in a conventional war will lose with little mobilization potential compared to the United States, not to mention Europe.

        explain in detail that there is a small "mobilization potential" in YOUR understanding

        I will try to explain this idea to you. To successfully fight for a long time, you need a powerful military industry that can replenish instantly combat losses. Modern combat systems are so complex that their release is literally single. Compare the T-34 and T-90MS tank. Never will Uralvagonzavod be able to give the front at least 100 tanks a day. The same goes for missile defense and air defense. These missiles are complex and their production is not even possible dozens a day. I don’t even want to talk about airplanes, God forbid, if they make one airplane a week.
        How can one fight in a conventional war when industry cannot provide one day of war. This is the mobilization potential.
        1. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 29 May 2015 22: 15
          +1
          that is, you want to say that Americans can give 100 abrams a day?
          this is a common problem of technological resources for both the Russian Federation and the United States or the EU, so forgive me for not proving or convincing
        2. TOR2
          TOR2 29 May 2015 22: 16
          +2
          Then a counter question arises. How long will it take our Armed Forces to destroy the German economy? Let's say to the level that there would be no new "Leopards" either.
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 29 May 2015 22: 23
            0
            Quote: TOR2
            Let's say to the level that there would be no new "Leopards" either.

            I would ask the question differently how many tanks per day (week, month) the EU economy can deliver, in addition there is one more point, those who will serve this equipment as it was right, it’s not T34 and not a tiger, you won’t master it in a month
            1. Hariva
              Hariva 30 May 2015 10: 03
              0
              After the "first strike", the survivors will continue the war. And they will fight mainly with a Kalashnikov assault rifle. It is relatively easy to manufacture and quick to learn.
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 30 May 2015 10: 35
                0
                hence the moral of what is considered a small mobilization resource as a tech weapon does not make sense
  38. Straight
    Straight 29 May 2015 20: 51
    +3
    The Serdyukov-Vasilyeva case showed that the basis of our state apparatus is corruption. And with such a basis, nothing will come of it. In general, nothing will come of it. But society was shown, as it were, that it must accept the fact that most of the budget will continue to be plundered. Apparently the fate of the Russian nobility did not teach anything. By the way, it is the violation of God's commandment “do not steal” that does not allow us to pursue a truly independent policy and take a proper place among the industrial powers. But the Serdyukov-Vasilyeva case is the final refusal of the parasites to correct themselves. Or maybe they will come to their senses?
  39. BAIKAL03
    BAIKAL03 29 May 2015 20: 54
    -3
    Quote: aleks3897
    NATO is the army of GEEV!

    I fully support you, but the obama’s army is: fagots, thieves, drug addicts and gays!
    1. 6 inches
      6 inches 29 May 2015 21: 15
      +2
      and in our conscripts, mainly the children of those who could not otmazat.a mobresurs trained-no. last time and when they called for training? and training is very low. contractors are good for peacetime but they will not be enough for a big war. so I do not care about the enemy, but I do not advise underestimating it.
    2. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 29 May 2015 21: 16
      0
      well, this is the same from a series of "little blood on enemy territory"
  40. PRO100CCCP
    PRO100CCCP 29 May 2015 21: 27
    0
    Syria hasn’t fallen yet. But the finale is coming soon ...
  41. Turkir
    Turkir 29 May 2015 21: 35
    0
    Russia clears up Serdyukov's mistakes

    How is it? Serdyukov came and made "mistakes"?
    That is, the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation did everything without control and did not obey anyone?
    Hard to believe.
  42. kotev19
    kotev19 29 May 2015 21: 41
    0
    Quote: kotev19
    But it’s a pity, yet the world as it is is peace! We’ll have to make matches, candles, canned food, dry mushrooms and so on ... Well, these scum are ugroginov ... ki! EVERYTHING BECAUSE OF THEM !!! WILL LASERS FROM OUTER SPACE tickle them? hi

    our
  43. kotev19
    kotev19 29 May 2015 21: 45
    +1
    Quote: kotev19
    You know that the white race in our world came from the Slavs, so nothing bad will happen! laughing

    Snowstorms and laser combat platform "Skif-DM"
  44. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 29 May 2015 22: 19
    +2
    The article is superficial. As authors often sin, firstly by references to little-known specialists, and secondly. hiding behind all kinds of reservations. In fact, the topic is too serious to be discussed in the style of amateurs. I think that even the General Staff cannot answer this question, having at hand a huge array of data.
  45. Yugra
    Yugra 29 May 2015 22: 40
    +3
    Just in the cinemas there is a film about the place where we will hit with "Poplar". Yes, the San Andreas fault. The same Sivkov described the consequences of a blow to this place. From the country of the mattress there will be scraps. And we will finish it off by hitting Yellowstone. I won't say anything to Geyrop, we will erase it on the first day. I'm not delirious. I have a friend, the commander of the nuclear submarine ...
  46. Clone
    Clone 29 May 2015 22: 40
    +3
    Will-not-be ... let the analysts build versions. And everyone else ... whether someone likes Vladimir Ilyich Lenin or not, one should remember and put into practice his wise words - "Learn military science in a real way!"
  47. NordUral
    NordUral 29 May 2015 22: 51
    0
    Soros refutes himself, if you change the PRC to the USA, then this can happen.
  48. lao_tsy
    lao_tsy 29 May 2015 22: 57
    0
    After the third world war, even the cockroaches will not.
  49. kotev19
    kotev19 29 May 2015 23: 24
    -3
    Quote: Clone
    Will-not-be ... let the analysts build versions. And everyone else ... whether someone likes Vladimir Ilyich Lenin or not, one should remember and put into practice his wise words - "Learn military science in a real way!"

    We know how "Wise Ilyich" taught military affairs - in 1917, in the basement of Smolny, he forced old Baltic sailors (honored revolutionaries) to pedal a dynamo non-stop, so that "Ilyich's lamp" was constantly shining over his head! laughing
  50. Zomanus
    Zomanus 30 May 2015 00: 45
    0
    Already described the scenario of the war. And they pointed out that if one of the parties outweighs, the second will immediately use nuclear weapons. So if there is a war, then in the form of mopping up satellites and allies that do not possess nuclear weapons. By the way, the deliveries of sprats and Proebaltics were blocked, dop ... sick.