60 years ago, died a great physicist - Albert Einstein

63
Albert Einstein was born 14 March 1879, in Ulm in southern Germany, died 18 on April 1955, in Princeton, USA at the age of 76. A theoretical physicist is one of the founders of modern theoretical physics; in 1921, he received the Nobel Prize in Physics. A public humanist, in different years he lived in Germany, Switzerland, the United States. He was an honorary doctor at about 20 of the world's leading universities, was also a member of the Academies of Sciences of many countries, including a foreign honorary member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR (1926 year).

The future famous scientist, whose name is remembered today even by those who did not pass physics at school, but passed by physics, was born 14 March 1879, in the small town of Ulm in the south of the German Empire. He was born into a poor Jewish family. His father was Hermann Einstein (1847-1902) co-owner of a small enterprise for the production of bedding for feather beds and mattresses. His mother was Paulina Einstein (nee Koch, 1858-1920), who came from a family of a fairly wealthy corn dealer Julius Derzbacher.

Einstein's ancestors settled in Swabia about 300 years ago, and the famous physicist maintained a soft South German pronunciation until the end of his life, even when he spoke English. The future scientist received his primary education in Munich, where his family moved to the Catholic school in 1880 year. At the age of 11-13 years, Albert Einstein experienced a state of deep religiosity. However, the boy read a lot, reading popular science literature made him a free-thinker, forever instilled in him a skeptical attitude towards authorities.

60 years ago, died a great physicist - Albert Einstein


Beginning with the 6 age, the boy, at the initiative of his mother, was engaged in playing the violin. This hobby Einstein kept throughout his life, playing this musical instrument has become part of the life of a great scientist. Many years later, in 1934, while already in Princeton, Albert Einstein gave his own concert. All fees from this event went in favor of the emigrants from Nazi Germany, cultural figures and scholars. On his violin, the famous physicist performed the works of Mozart, whose passionate admirer he remained throughout his life.

Oddly enough, in the gymnasium, Einstein was not among the first students. Then he excelled in mathematics and Latin. At the same time, Albert did not like a lot in the gymnasium - in particular, the authoritarian attitude of teachers towards students and the well-established system of mechanical learning of teaching materials by students. Einstein believed that excessive cramming causes more harm to learning and the development of creative thinking than good. Because of these disagreements, the future scientist often entered into arguments with teachers.

In the Munich gymnasium, his thirst for geometry and natural science was revealed. Very quickly in the exact sciences, Einstein was able to circumvent his peers. By 16 years he mastered the basics of mathematical science, including integral and differential calculus. In the 1895 year, without graduating from high school, Einstein went to Zurich, where the Federal Higher Polytechnic School was located, which in those years enjoyed an excellent reputation. From the first time, he could not enter this institution, unable to pass the exam in modern languages ​​and stories. The Rector of the Polytechnic School, assessing the applicant’s very outstanding mathematical abilities, sent him to prepare for the cantonal school in Aarau, which in those years was considered one of the best in Switzerland.

In this school, Albert Einstein spent only one year, but this year passed for him with benefit. After graduating from school in 1896, he entered the Zurich Polytechnic. He spent most of his time at this institution in the physical laboratory, and the rest of the time he read the classic works of J. Maxwell, G. Kirchhoff, G. Helmholtz and others. He graduated from the Polytechnic in 1900, but for two years a graduate could not find a permanent job. Until finally, in the year 1902, he received, on the recommendation of friends, the place of technical expert at the Swiss Patent Office located in Bern.



Shortly before that, Einstein changed citizenship, becoming a Swiss national. A few months after he got a job, he first married his former classmate from Zurich, Mileva Maric, who was from Serbia and was older than Albert by 4. In Bern, at the Patent Office, which Einstein himself called the “secular monastery,” he worked for more than 7 years, calling those years the happiest in his life. The position of "patent assistant" constantly occupied his inquiring mind with technical and scientific issues, while leaving enough time for independent creativity. The result was the publication of scientific articles that will change the face of modern physics and bring their author world-wide fame.

1905 has become a truly breakthrough year for Einstein. This year, the Annals of Physics magazine immediately published 3 outstanding articles by a young scientist, which marked the beginning of a new revolution in science, these were materials:

1. "To the electrodynamics of moving bodies." The article was the beginning of the theory of relativity.

2. "On one heuristic point of view concerning the emergence and transformation of light." She became one of the works that laid the foundations of the quantum theory emerging at that moment.

3. "On the motion of particles suspended in a fluid at rest, required by the molecular-kinetic theory of heat." This work was devoted to the Brownian motion and greatly advanced statistical physics.

In 1909, a young scientist visited the congress of naturalists, which was held in Salzburg, Austria. At this congress, it was possible to collect all the elite of German physics. It was in Salzburg that Einstein first met Planck; after three years of correspondence, they became close friends, maintaining friendship until the end of their lives. After the Salzburg convention, Albert Einstein finally got a paid position as a professor at the University of Zurich. In Zurich, he worked for two years. Since the salary of a university lecturer was small, especially for a family that already had two children, in 1911, Albert Einstein accepted without any hesitation an invitation to head the physics department at German University in Prague. During this period, the scientist continued to publish his work on the theory of relativity, thermodynamics and quantum field theory.



A year later, the scientist returned to Zurich, and at the end of the 1913 of the year, on the recommendation of his friend Plank, he was invited to head the Physics Research Institute in Berlin. Later, he was also enrolled as a professor at the University of Berlin. Einstein, without hesitation, accepted the invitation and in the pre-war 1914 year, the convinced pacifist Albert Einstein arrived in the capital of Germany. At the same time, Mileva and her children remained in Zurich, their family broke up, in February 1919, their divorce was formalized.

After the end of the First World War, Albert Einstein, without abandoning his past research, became interested in new fields of physics - the Unified Field Theory and Relativistic Cosmology. The unified field theory was intended by the scientist to unite electromagnetism, gravity, and also the theory of the microworld. His first article on cosmology appeared back in the war years in 1917.

In June, 1919, Albert Einstein married for the second time, this time Elsa Löventhal to his cousin on the maternal side, and he adopted her two children. In the fall of 1919, a solar eclipse occurred. At the same time, British researchers discovered the deviation of light predicted by Einstein in the field of the sun. The value measured by them did not correspond to the Newtonian, but to the Einstein law of aggression. This sensational news very quickly spread throughout Europe, as Einstein's theory of relativity received experimental evidence, the fame of the scientist at that moment reached unprecedented heights.



It is worth noting that in the life of the scientist that period of life was very strange. He was overtaken by several different diseases. In addition to old, but aggravated complications with the liver, Einstein was diagnosed with a stomach ulcer, and then jaundice, and he also had general weakness. A scientist spent several months lying in bed. But even at this time he did not give up his research. Diseases retreated from Einstein only in 1920.

Prior to this, Albert Einstein was nominated many times for the Nobel Prize in Physics, but the theories of the scientist seemed so revolutionary that the members of the Nobel Committee could not decide on awarding them to the author for a long time. As a result, a compromise was found. The 1921 Prize in Physics was awarded to a scientist for the theory of the photoelectric effect, that is, well tested in experiments and his most undisputed work. However, the text of the decision of the Nobel Committee included a diplomatic and neutral addition "... and for other work carried out in the field of theoretical physics."

In the 20-ies of XX century, Albert Einstein was a recognized authority and a person of great importance, he was constantly involved in various political actions. At the same time, a world-renowned scientist spoke in favor of internationalization, the establishment of social justice, and cooperation between states. In 1923, Albert Einstein took part in the organization of the cultural society Friends of New Russia. Repeatedly, the scientist called for disarmament and unification of Europe, called for the abolition of compulsory military service.



In his memoirs, another famous physicist Max Born noted: “Already in the early years, Albert Einstein demonstrated the indomitable will to independence. He hated the game of soldiers, because it meant violence. ” Later, Einstein himself declared that for those people who enjoyed marching to the sounds of the march, the brain was in vain, they could well have done with just one spinal cord.

In 1929, the scientist's 50 anniversary was celebrated pompously all over the world, but the hero of the occasion did not take part in these celebrations. He chose to hide from everyone in his suburban villa near Potsdam, where he had a good time, growing his roses enthusiastically.

All this happened against the backdrop of the growing economic crisis in Europe. At the same time, political instability intensified in Germany, radical nationalist sentiments and anti-Semitism grew in the society. Insults and direct threats against a scientist have become more frequent. It got to the point that once appeared a leaflet in which a large reward in 50 of thousands of stamps was offered for Einstein’s head. After the Nazis came to power in Germany, all the works of the scientist were declared a distortion of true science, while an uncompromising racial purge unfolded in the country.

Albert Einstein was tied to Germany, but he could not be in this country, and already in 1933, he had to leave the country in which he was born forever. With his family, he moved to the United States, and after some time, in a sign of his protest against the crimes of Nazism, he refused membership in the Prussian and Bavarian Academies of Sciences, as well as German citizenship. After moving across the Atlantic, Einstein became a professor of physics at Princeton (New Jersey) at the new Institute for Basic Research. Here he became a real media attraction. Despite the fact that he was known to physicists of world renown, he was a very friendly, modest and somewhat eccentric man, whom you could always just run into on the street. In the hours free from work, Einstein loved to play music. Sometimes he played the violin in an ensemble with other physicists. He also liked sailing, which, in his opinion, contributed in an extraordinary way to thinking about physical problems.



In America, Albert Einstein almost immediately became one of the most respected and famous people, earning the reputation of the most brilliant scientist of our time. At the same time, he had a very colorful appearance and gained the image of a “scattered professor” among the people. In January, 1934, at the invitation of Einstein, visited the White House and met with Roosevelt, with whom he had a long cordial conversation. Every day, the scientist received hundreds of letters of different content, to which he always tried to answer as much as possible. Being a world-renowned scientist, he continued to remain a modest, accessible, friendly, and undemanding person.

In August 1939, he, among others, put his signature on a letter addressed to the President of the United States, drafted on the initiative of the Hungarian physicist Leo Silard. In this letter, Roosevelt’s attention was drawn to the possibility that Hitlerite Germany could acquire an atomic bomb. After several months of thinking, the American president decided to take this threat seriously and created his own project to develop nuclear weapons. weapons. In this case, Albert Einstein did not participate in the work on the creation of the military atom. Later, he was very worried about his signature on this letter, realizing that the new US President Harry Truman would use nuclear weapons as a deterrent tool. Subsequently, Einstein strongly criticized developments in this field, the use of nuclear weapons against Japan, and tests conducted on the Bikini Atoll (1954). His involvement in the acceleration of work on the development of atomic bombs, he considered the greatest tragedy of his life.

Albert Einstein did not give up physics until the very end of his life. In 1955, the health of a scientist deteriorated dramatically. He even managed to write a will, and said to his friends: "I have already fulfilled my task on Earth." His last work, which he did not have time to finish, was an appeal with a call to prevent a nuclear war on the planet. The great physicist died on April 18 1955 in Princeton at the age of 76 from an aortic aneurysm. In the memory of mankind, he will forever remain a great scientist who turned the idea of ​​people about the universe. Einstein wished the time and place of his burial not to be disclosed. 19 April 1955, without any publicity in the presence of all 12 close friends, passed his funeral. The body of the scientist was burned in the Ewing-Simteri crematorium, and the ashes were then scattered to the wind.

Based on materials from open sources
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 18 2015 06: 11
    people like Einstein, Tesla, as if they came from the future ...
    1. nvv
      nvv
      +3
      April 18 2015 08: 10
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      people like Einstein, Tesla, as if they came from the future ...

      Well, Tesla may come from the future.
      But Einstein, definitely from the dark past.

      This world was shrouded in deep darkness.
      Let there be light!
      And Newton appeared.
      But Satan did not wait long for revenge.
      Einstein came
      And everything became as before.
      1. +5
        April 18 2015 09: 05
        Comrade, do you have all the new physicists after Newton - the messengers of Satan, or just Einstein?
        1. nvv
          nvv
          +5
          April 18 2015 10: 17
          Andrei, I think (if of course we think) we will find a lot.
          This is not a witch hunt.
          This is the knowledge of truth.
          Be silent, and Satan will triumph.
          Something like that.
        2. 0
          April 18 2015 10: 43
          Patent Officer Einstein Albert. - A plagiarist, a thief and a parasite. I could not formulate anything after I divorced Milena, who was the author of what he attributed to himself this gigolo by the name of Einstein. And after that, only with the support of Jewish-Zionist patronage from Rothschild and Rockefeller, he grabbed the Nobel Prize for the seventh time and then traded his appearance in various committees of the world and other interlovers.
          1. kompotnenado
            +3
            April 18 2015 14: 33
            Little of. He grabbed the Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect, which, for a minute, was discovered by the Russian physicist Stoletov. Which is never mentioned in connection with the Einstein nobel. The special theory of relativity is Lorenz and Poincare. The general is very doubtful. In general, Nobel’s a banal Jewish tag.
            1. +4
              April 18 2015 19: 26
              Quote: kompotnenado
              The special theory of relativity is Lorenz and Poincare. The general is very doubtful. In general, the Nobel banal Jewish l

              Quote: kompotnenado
              Patent Officer Einstein Albert. - A plagiarist, a thief and a parasite.

              Quote: kompotnenado
              The special theory of relativity is Lorenz and Poincare.

              Where is Paunkare and Lorenz ?? Einstein has repeatedly said that he was based on the work of Poincare, Poincare himself wrote about him
              Einstein is one of the most original minds I knew; Despite his youth, he already took a very honorable place among the most prominent scientists of his time. Most of all, he admires the ease with which he adapts to new concepts and is able to extract all the consequences from them ....

              I wonder how he could steal the theory from Poincare if Poincare himself, almost until the end of his life, did not agree with TO.

              They have already written 100 times that the patent office had nothing to do with the works of Lorentz, Poincaré or Hilbert, whose theft was also blamed on Einstein.
              Neither then nor now did scientific work go through the patent office; other departments did this.

              This is how science works, scientists take interesting ideas and refine them. Einstein did not agree with Poincare and created his theory in which from Poincare and Lorentz only general concepts. So you can blame Newton for plagiarism, because he created the integral calculus, which everyone uses.
              1. +6
                April 18 2015 22: 06
                Quote: Rumata
                So you can blame Newton for plagiarism, because he created the integral calculus, which everyone uses.

                In the same way, any scientist can be blamed, since any scientific work is based on theories, developments and conclusions of predecessors. In our dissertations, there is even a section entitled "Review of Literary Sources".
                1. -5
                  April 19 2015 05: 47
                  they are referenced, Odnobilnikov did not.
              2. Erg
                -1
                April 18 2015 23: 07
                You amuse me more wink
              3. -6
                April 19 2015 05: 03
                Isaac also created almost nothing - he stole mainly from Hooke, Leibniz and Barrow. Worked as a secretary for Hook, then when he himself became the boss, he ordered all his portraits to be burned.
                In addition to the patent office, Albertik was also a laboratory assistant at the University of Berlin, where he spied on the drawings and calculation formulas of YaB, then he tapped on this prezkom.
                So it goes.
                Aristotle, with his "flat earth" (although the ancient Greeks already knew everything), triangular rather than parabolic ballistics, and his boxer shvonder-guards who mutilated all dissent, was an even more interesting pepper.
                1. -3
                  April 19 2015 05: 57
                  How much is "minus"? Which of the following was not true? laughing
                  1. 0
                    April 19 2015 22: 52
                    Quote: Scraptor
                    How much is "minus"? Which of the following was not true?

                    Newton knew mathematics well, for which he became secretary.
                    Cons are not mine. In physics, that's right.
                    1. 0
                      April 19 2015 23: 40
                      actually he was ... an alchemist. and was engaged in the movement of pieces of paper in the office at Hooke.
              4. kompotnenado
                +2
                April 19 2015 15: 07
                Did I say THAT is stolen? I wanted to say that Einstein is by no means a discoverer. THAT did not have any influence on the further development of science and technology. So curious idleness. It was quantum physics that produced a scientific and technological explosion. Einstein simply did not understand her. In physics, the mass of people is an order of magnitude greater than our Odnokamenev. Which of the inhabitants have heard of Paul Dirac? The hype surrounding Odnokamenev is a Jewish promotion.
                1. +4
                  April 19 2015 16: 21
                  kompotnenadoAre you actually aware of the essence of the dispute between Einstein and Bohr about quantum mechanics? What exactly did not suit Einstein and what exactly did Bohr parry? And who told you that Einstein did not understand quantum mechanics or that THAT had no effect on science (I am silent about technology, the time has not come yet)? Or the phenomenon of curvature of light and gravitational lenses (coupled with black holes) as a direct consequence of TO are not established facts? And what kind of "technical" explosion was produced by quantum mechanics? Lasers, in which the phenomenon of forced transition under the influence of photons was also predicted and described by Einstein?

                  Paul Dirac is a theoretical physicist, his physical ideas are so original that, like SRT, even the average physicist is not always clear, not to mention the average people. Poincare and Lorenz, about whom there is so much talk, are also known to the layman no more than Kitaygorodsky or Chernkov, so is this also an argument for greatness or lack thereof? By the way, most ordinary people still believe that Mendeleev invented vodka (otherwise he simply didn’t have it), and at leisure after tasting alcoholic solutions glued suitcases.
                  1. Elk
                    Elk
                    +1
                    April 20 2015 23: 12
                    I’m silent about technology, the time has not come yet)

                    Already come. The effects associated with the curvature of time space have a rather serious effect on the satellites of the global positioning system. This makes you constantly synchronize and check the progress of the clock, which is installed on it.
                    1. +3
                      April 21 2015 15: 48
                      Quote: Elk
                      e has come. The effects associated with the curvature of time space have a rather serious effect on the satellites of the global positioning system. This makes you constantly synchronize and check the progress of the clock, which is installed on it.

                      Well, again I missed something. So, you look, soon we will learn how to make "wormholes" wink ...

                      Of course, the manifestations of relativistic effects are already enough, the same experiments on accelerators, elementary particle physics, nuclear and thermonuclear processes, astronomy of ultra-long objects ... I think that justice and STR, and GR are clear enough, there is simply no arguing (especially with ignoramuses) necessary. I’m more interested in the theory of the Great Unification or the theory of everything will appear or will there be something else? The question, of course, is rhetorical, but interesting.
                    2. -2
                      April 21 2015 16: 20
                      and all this, as well as the precession of the orbit of Mercury, is precisely absorbed by the Poincare formulas, the essence of which is comrade Einstein simply perverted, replacing the essence of things with distortions of observation.

                      Of course, the manifestations of relativistic effects are already enough, the same experiments on accelerators, elementary particle physics, nuclear and thermonuclear processes, astronomy of ultra-long objects ... I think that justice and STR, and GR are clear enough, there is simply no arguing (especially with ignoramuses) necessary. I’m more interested in the theory of the Great Unification or the theory of everything will appear or will there be something else? The question, of course, is rhetorical, but interesting.

                      a lot of buzzwords ... it sometimes affects the young lady who is bored and the man is still gone ... Yes
                      or are they "the same" sad
          2. Erg
            -6
            April 18 2015 23: 04
            Totally agree with you. His name is Judas. Possessing outstanding knowledge in physics, he sold out for green papers ... With his false theory of probability, he "let" fundamental physics go down the wrong path. Thanks to this figure, we are still marking time (burning with wood).
            1. 0
              April 19 2015 05: 39
              That is, one person took to physics, and therefore tens of thousands of scientists around the world on the wrong path?
              1. 0
                April 19 2015 06: 39
                Susanin is resting ... laughing
              2. 0
                April 19 2015 17: 21
                That is, one person took to physics, and therefore tens of thousands of scientists around the world on the wrong path?


                Yes SRT now "tens of thousands of scientists around the world" do not need a fuck. It works in the macrocosm when material objects move at speeds close to light. And we do not reach such speeds. And within the limits of the first-second-third cosmic velocities, it is quite possible to do with Newton's mechanics.
                And in the microcosm, SRT does not work, so they spat at it from the very beginning, and use quantum mechanics.
                That is, SRT in fact is, on the one hand, a beautiful bugaboo with which you can swear, and on the other - Elusive Joe, which no one needs to refute.
                1. -2
                  April 20 2015 13: 39
                  Poincaré calculated the change in the orbit of Mercury in my opinion, Einstein had nothing to do with it. In the microcosm, everything is the same, but for the macrocosm of "potential" functions, as well as "principles of uncertainty", for some reason no one thinks up. feel

                  Uncertainty is all the same not a singularity laughing Well, you can't define - move away, "move over" ...
            2. kompotnenado
              0
              April 19 2015 15: 10
              "The theory of probability". BOTTOM.
            3. +3
              April 19 2015 16: 24
              Quote: Erg
              His deceitful probability theory

              Dear, after this passage, the level of your competence in the matter under discussion simply knocks down.
        3. +7
          April 18 2015 11: 42
          Quote: Dagen
          Comrade, do you have all the new physicists after Newton - the messengers of Satan, or just Einstein?

          Actually, this is the irony expressed in verses. The meaning of allegory is a poetic illustration of the infinity of knowledge and the constant variability of the world, which leads to the inevitability of the emergence of new theories and views on the structure of the world.

          Hope not very difficult?
          1. +2
            April 18 2015 13: 14
            No, actually this is not ironic if you scroll down the page and read other comments from fellow nvv.
            1. +2
              April 18 2015 13: 21
              Quote: Dagen
              No, actually this is not ironic if you scroll down the page and read other comments from fellow nvv.

              I meant this famous poem. And these comments are, of course, quite remarkable.
          2. 0
            April 19 2015 23: 27
            Quote: Alex
            Hope not very difficult?

            Wow, you're so smart.
        4. -1
          April 18 2015 11: 43
          why "after"? bully
        5. 0
          April 18 2015 15: 12
          Quote: Dagen
          Comrade
          ...

          Well, comrade joked !!! Read carefully the first post ... for it is said!
        6. Erg
          -1
          April 18 2015 22: 57
          If you do not think in physics, have a mind so that it does not override
        7. -2
          April 19 2015 09: 22
          ... Einstein is a charlatan from science .. He received the Nobel Prize for the second law of the photoelectric effect stolen from Stoletov ... and his special theory of relativity is a special case when the speed is impossible above the speed of light in the system, although it is known that the propagation speed of gravitational waves exceeds the speed of light 50 million times - a Jew, he is a Jew ..
      2. 0
        April 18 2015 19: 57
        I support our Russian response to Western sabotage. Article on Kramola. Falsification of the periodic table. Http://www.kramola.info/vesti/rusy/falsifikacija-tablicy-mendeleeva
        1. +4
          April 18 2015 22: 18
          Quote: andrei.yandex
          I support our Russian response to Western sabotage. Article on Kramola. Falsification of the periodic table. Http://www.kramola.info/vesti/rusy/falsifikacija-tablicy-mendeleeva

          Ser, before you read the crap, you would have learned chemistry at least in the context of the 7-th high school, or something. As for Mendeleev, great people have great mistakes. However, they are just easy to explain, only Dmitry Ivanovich himself did not live up to this. So there is nothing to speculate on his authority.
          1. -2
            April 19 2015 06: 02
            it’s immediately obvious that you’ve odd the article (unless its first paragraph), but you disapprove in advance.
          2. -3
            April 19 2015 09: 22
            And you still believe in what the Soviet system gave - it is unquestioned authority, and who said that science is not distorted. In general, you first give a refutation. They didn’t give us much in the Soviet school, but even distorted it, including the language. If you are inclined to the Soviet school, give a little explanation on why the Bolsheviks carried out the reform of the language immediately after the revolution, as a result we removed a few letters. And in history, what did you do? So you speculate. And Tesla with his own experiences and developments. The circumcised knowledge gave - this is a fact. So read more, self-educate.
            1. +3
              April 21 2015 18: 48
              andrei.yandex, You are already rather fed up with your righteous anger about the reform of the Russian language. What and why was removed there, I'm not in a big course, but if you think that "yat", "firth" and "fit" were extremely necessary for the Russian language, then to you proto-ukram: they also introduced the second "g" back. True, they did not understand what to do with it later, but elementary school teachers had a headache.

              Now about your remark to me. What did you personally not like about the school chemistry course in Soviet times? What is it specifically cut you (or cut off)? And what to refute? Errors of Mendeleev? So I wrote about them briefly, and to give lectures on the epistemology of the development of views on the structure of the atom and the foundations of the Periodic Law on this site there is no place or sense: this is a subject of separate consideration.
    2. Rif
      -1
      April 18 2015 18: 02
      As "great" as Malevich, as long as there are buying squares, they will dim! And no one has canceled the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", regardless of their authenticity.
      1. +2
        April 18 2015 19: 28
        Quote: Rif
        No one canceled the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", regardless of their authenticity.

        Even so? =)
        1. -4
          April 19 2015 05: 08
          To you on sem40.ru Yes
          1. +1
            April 19 2015 05: 31
            Why didn’t the Jews please you? Poured salt under the tail, or did you study better at school than you? It's not that a Jew or a Chechen or Russian, in any nation there are geniuses and fools, lack of money or ready to strangle oneself for a penny, scoundrels and heroes.
            1. -5
              April 19 2015 06: 34
              This is a non-Jewish site. why didn’t you write about it?
              the fact is that among some there are much more than among others. at school, by the way, they studied worse ... bully and did not please (like, the best is the enemy of the good, well, etc.) laughing
    3. +5
      April 18 2015 20: 04
      Well-oooh ... Einstein was not always considered a genius. Contemporaries had a slightly different opinion about him. For example, Poincare openly accused Bertik of plagiarism.

      ... Working since 1902 in the patent office, Einstein received a lot of the latest and most relevant scientific information, accumulated and used the advanced knowledge of other scientists. He created his special theory of relativity in 1905. But he did not create it from scratch. He took the basic ideas from Poincare, the mathematical apparatus borrowed from Lorentz. A decent scientist is obliged to give references to his predecessors, such is scientific ethics. In his work, Einstein did not give a single link, thereby, passing off other people's discoveries as his own. In the scientific world, this is called plagiarism, that is, intellectual theft. ........

      After the publication of the special theory of relativity, Poincare, having met Einstein once, accused him of plagiarism and scientific dishonesty. Naive Poincare did not understand that plagiarism does not exist for a Jew. Judaism claims that any property of the goyim (including intellectual property) is the property of a Jew who will be the first to seize it. To steal someone else's and pass off as their own is a typical method of Jewish genius. Einstein taught the Jews a lot. After Einstein, all patent offices in the world are crammed with Jews. Patent offices became Jewish thieves' stashes of theft of the ideas of non-Jews.

      The role of Einstein's Slavic wife - Mileva Marić (Serbs by nationality) in the creation of both the special and general theory of relativity is completely hushed up. However, Mileva Marich was a strong physicist, and her role, to put it mildly, is not small. It is enough to note that all three “epoch-making” articles of Einstein were signed by the co-authors of Einstein-Marich (74, p. 128).


      If someone finds such a view of "genius" too radical, google, for example, "Einstein's plagiarism". You will get enough sleep with a link to a bunch of articles and films showing facts from the biography of the "great scientist" that leave no room for doubt.
  2. +8
    April 18 2015 06: 41
    In his memoirs, another famous physicist Max Bourne noted: “Already in the early years, Albert Einstein showed everyone the indomitable will to independence
    He was genius in humor
    Talented person is talented everywhere

    Colleagues

    once
    Einstein walked along the Princeton corridor, and towards him - young and oh-so
    low-talented physicist. Along with Einstein, he famously slammed
    his shoulder and patronizingly asked:
    “How are you, colleague?”
    - A colleague? Einstein asked in surprise. - Are you also sick with rheumatism?

    Einstein's wife

    Einstein’s wife was asked what she thinks of her husband. She answered:
    "My husband is a genius! He can do absolutely everything except money!"

    About great thoughts

    One brisk journalist, holding a notebook and a pencil, asked Einstein:
    "Do you have a notebook or notebook where you write down your great thoughts?"
    Einstein looked at him and said:
    "Young man! Truly great thoughts come to mind so rarely that they are not difficult to remember."
    1. +11
      April 18 2015 11: 45
      Once upon a time beautiful, but rather stupid ( lol ) a Hollywood actress at one of the receptions said to Einstein:
      - Mr. Einstein, you and I must definitely get married. Our children will be as beautiful as I, and as smart as you.
      “Madame, are you not afraid of the opposite?”
  3. +1
    April 18 2015 06: 45
    Such people are born once in an era. hi
    1. +4
      April 18 2015 08: 27
      Quote: Athenogen
      Such people are born once in an era. hi

      I agree with you .. Genius, one word! hi
      1. nvv
        nvv
        -2
        April 18 2015 08: 35
        MIKHAN, every time I pass by and throw a plus in your piggy bank.
        I want you to become a two millionaire.
        Today, the hand did not rise.
        From your words to Athenogeny
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Quote: Athenogen
        Such people are born once in an era. hi

        I agree with you .. Genius, one word! hi
        1. +1
          April 18 2015 22: 31
          I support. Who cares not about verbiage verbiage, but a detailed analysis. He who has eyes, let him see, who has ears ... I apologize for the banality

      2. kompotnenado
        +2
        April 18 2015 14: 35
        You guys are not in the subject. Einstein really did practically nothing in physics. In addition to its popularization.
        1. +3
          April 18 2015 19: 29
          Quote: kompotnenado
          You guys are not in the subject. Einstein really did practically nothing in physics. In addition to its popularization.

          I'm in the subject, let's enlighten me!
    2. -1
      April 18 2015 09: 39
      What about the "professor"?
      1. nvv
        nvv
        0
        April 18 2015 10: 26
        Is it about "our"?
        Look at the nickname, and you will see everything for yourself.
  4. 0
    April 18 2015 07: 00
    There is not so much left for us, or rather a lot - to link weak interactions with the general theory of the field. Three have been resolved, but the fourth ... Here prospects open up which the human mind, taken separately, does not immediately realize. Or maybe the Creator, looking at what his offspring are doing with each other, held on to this very knowledge, to the best, what is called time ??
    1. +5
      April 18 2015 11: 50
      Quote: crasever
      There is not so much left for us, or rather a lot - to link weak interactions with the general theory of the field.

      Weak interactions were linked to electromagnetic ones a long time ago (the theory of electroweak interactions was developed back in the middle of the 70 of the XX century). At the same time, the first steps of unification with the strong ones were outlined, but EMNIP only recently managed to coordinate all the subtleties (I won’t say that, I fell out of the development of science somewhat, however age). The main problems were with gravity, but it seems that there are reports about the development of a unified theory of space, time and field in the framework of string theory. I won’t say for sure, still not a theoretical physicist, but quite interesting.
      1. -3
        April 18 2015 18: 47
        Let me disagree - it was on the weak that they were and are, serious (theoretical, while calculations), but the linkage, say, with the strong (gravitational waves) into a single physical law, they never received, tried in the USSR, to prove, the receivers, perhaps , due to the quality of the construction, did not give correct results for fundamental scientific conclusions. Well, and with the development, or arguing, as it should, the scientist, with Einstein, back in the 80s, Academician Logunov spoke in Science and Life ...
        1. +3
          April 18 2015 23: 51
          craseverQueen of heaven, did you even understand what you wrote? Even I, a non-physicist, have long known that strong interactions are forces acting in the atomic nucleus and responsible for its stability (or not) and limited by distances of the order of the diameter of the atomic nucleus. And gravity is the interaction of the masses, which manifests itself at any distance and has nothing to do with the structure of the atom. Weak interactions also act at the level of atomic nuclei, but are much weaker and are responsible only for beta decay. So study physics (at least school), and at the same time learn grammar - there are so many commas that it’s just right to put them half the word.
          1. +5
            April 18 2015 23: 57
            BM-13, removed from the tongue. I can only add just such a plate - some illustration of the current state of the "theory of everything". As you can see, the theory of electroweak interactions was developed, as I said earlier, quite a long time ago, but with the rest so far the difficulties are more and more at the level of theories and calculations.
          2. -2
            April 19 2015 03: 34
            I would ask you to be more correct in expressions - the Queen of Heaven, it is better to write with capital letters (and so in vain - well, I don’t know, you know better, of course), and it’s better not to neglect the commas, or it will turn out, as in the cartoon "you cannot have mercy "... Dear Alex, it was a plus from me right away, for an informative message, but you should, once again consider, different scientific approaches to the origin of gravity, just related, not only to the structure of atomic nuclei, but even further. .. Yours faithfully .
            1. +4
              April 19 2015 11: 23
              Respected crasever, no such theory of gravitation exists, in any case did not exist until now. This force is so different from all the others that a convincing physical and mathematical apparatus for its existence has not yet been developed. Perhaps (I emphasize, only POSSIBLE) the Higgs boson is the very particle that is responsible for its existence (however, experiments at the LHC did not give an unambiguous answer). So the "theory" of gravity, especially in the popular presentation like REN-TV, is not worth a damn.

              By the way, in theoretical physics, almost a quarter of various theories were considered, all with solid mathematical confirmation, but none of them was accepted, since they did not bring anything essentially new in comparison with GR or Newton's. At the same time, gravity does not make any influence on the formation and life of the atomic nucleus, since the Coulomb interaction alone, other things being equal, exceeds the gravitational order by 10 ^ 42 times.

              You are kindly requested to heed the advice BM-13 regarding raising the level of knowledge in physics (at the same time I leave out the discussion the tone and expression in which this proposal was made - this is a question of personal ethics). Regards and best wishes ...
          3. -2
            April 19 2015 06: 09
            and how do these strong and weak interactions differ in nature? more precisely by the mechanism. somehow it's unscientific so that a kilogram of lead weighs more than a kilogram of water bully
            1. -2
              April 19 2015 06: 30
              Well, a kilogram of lead, of course, cannot be heavier than the same kilogram of water, but it is these bricks that manifest themselves differently, being, say, in the same set physical conditions ... It’s a clue in the periodic table - there is !!! But you need to set up experiments, evaluate mathematically, argue, raise capable children, live and work, in general!
              1. 0
                April 19 2015 06: 48
                Well, that the system of measures and weights in Ukraine is different - I was convinced of this in Russian markets long ago wassat
                probably the LHC had to be built there, Like the Eurosmodrome not in Kura laughing
                it would have happened with the Europeans, since they had forgotten to attach wings to their shuttle.
              2. +3
                April 19 2015 11: 29
                Quote: crasever
                It is in the periodic table, there is a clue !!!

                And what kind of clues are there in the periodic table? All three (or four, as some researchers emphasize) stages of the development of the Periodic Law are well known, the reasons for the error of D.I. Mendeleev and other chemists and physicists of the late 19th - early 20th centuries have long been known, the boundaries and discreteness of changes in properties are explained (the only question is where is its END, not the BEGINNING). Enough speculation on this topic.
            2. +3
              April 19 2015 11: 25
              Quote: Scraptor
              and how do these strong and weak interactions differ in nature?

              This is the central question of the "theory of the Grand Unification", which has not yet been created (at least not presented to the general public).
              1. -4
                April 19 2015 11: 57
                But why is it complicated, I don’t understand? bully in the case of the strong, the matter is apparently in the structure of the particles themselves ...
                1. +3
                  April 19 2015 12: 26
                  Quote: Scraptor
                  But why is it complicated, I don’t understand?

                  Probably, you, like me, are not a specialist, and therefore do not understand.
                  1. -2
                    April 19 2015 12: 55
                    you probably don’t know to whom you are writing, what happened after the emoticon however makes sense ...
                    1. +2
                      April 19 2015 14: 15
                      Quote: Scraptor
                      you probably don’t know who you are writing to
                      Absolutely correctly, nothing can be extracted from your profile.

                      Quote: Scraptor
                      what happened after the emoticon however makes sense ...
                      Nothing, just a few smart words in the style of smart typing texts from gridasova.
                      1. -2
                        April 19 2015 14: 46
                        gridasov? I don’t know - I don’t know.

                        strong interaction has no new forces, it is destruction or the formation of complexes of simpler particles. if nuclear forces were something new, these "strong" fields would be detected in the same way at a distance as "weak" (Coulomb, etc)
                      2. +3
                        April 19 2015 16: 11
                        Scraptor, you can find out what kind of education you have (honestly, without tricks): when and what university did you graduate from and what is your major in diploma? I have the impression that you have no idea at least about the basics of elementary particle physics, but constantly troll some kind of nonsense. I’d just like to understand what’s the matter: either the skis don’t go, or something is wrong with the interlocutor ...
                      3. -4
                        April 19 2015 16: 30
                        No you can not. Does the "nuclear force" have a field?
                    2. 0
                      April 19 2015 22: 20
                      Quote: Scraptor
                      you probably don’t know who you are writing to

                      Is that a threat? ..
                      1. -4
                        April 19 2015 23: 29
                        to whom? one opponent - a moose, the second - a deer, and blacklisted ... and he was just about to open a pandora’s clack bully
  5. +4
    April 18 2015 07: 30
    The basis of the Theory of Relativity is the Lorentz equation, but this is NEVER talked about. Like the work of Russians on the creation of lasers! ..
    1. 0
      April 18 2015 09: 23
      Who does not speak? Well, you do not say that Lorentz developed the Maxwell equations. And Maxwell developed Ampere's law and Faraday's electromagnetic induction. Here we are so selected with the discoveries a century before Einstein, having missed a large number of scientists along the way, who also contributed.

      I agree about Russian scientists, but the problem here is the constant distance of Russian culture from European. However, in most cases, this distance is a plus laughing
      1. kompotnenado
        -1
        April 18 2015 14: 37
        And what did Einstein add to the Lorentz transformations? Nothing.
        1. Elk
          Elk
          +1
          April 19 2015 07: 28
          And what did Einstein add to the Lorentz transformations? Nothing.

          Well, perhaps such a small thing as the justification for combining space and time into a single continuum with a single geometry, as well as the fact that mass and energy are equivalent, therefore the EM field is also matter. And finally, the principle of interaction of matter and space. Here is such a small thing.
          Lorentz carried out the transformation of the Maxwell system of equations, but did not give a physical definition of the result.
          By the way, for the rest of his life, Einstein considered GRT to be incomplete and worked on its development.
          1. -3
            April 19 2015 08: 41
            Quote: Elk
            Well, perhaps such a small thing as the justification for combining space and time into a single continuum with a single geometry, as well as the fact that mass and energy are equivalent, therefore the EM field is also matter. Here is such a small thing.

            and this wrong "little" dislocated almost everyone's brains, or turns normal people away from science (which was all they had to achieve),
            The continuum from space and time connected in one formula "F = ma" somehow does not form, although the length and time in acceleration a = dv / dt, where v = dl / dt in one formula are connected, and matter (m) is mass, but not energy E,
            It is quite an ordinary bazaar gypsy kidalovo with a substitution of concepts at a representative level.
            1. Elk
              Elk
              +1
              April 19 2015 09: 32
              and this wrong "little" dislocated almost everyone's brains,

              I do not know. Somehow, the theory of Relativity has gone to me no more complicated than thermodynamics. I had to work, I do not argue, but there is nothing particularly abstruse there. Quantum mechanics is more fun. But I am not a physicist, therefore I did not tinker in special depths.
              and matter (m) is mass, but not energy E,

              Yeah. But you explain this to the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, who were burned in a nuclear fire.
              And at the same time, since everything is so simple, then give your definition of mass, energy and matter.
              The continuum from space and time connected in one formula "F = ma" somehow is not formed,

              Everything will be formed, if we only accept that Newtonian mechanics is a particular manifestation of the theory of relativity.
              By the way, Newton’s second law just describes the interaction of the continuum with matter, when its energy changes at relativistic speeds.
              1. -3
                April 19 2015 12: 46
                Well, maybe your thermodynamics went under "fire water" as well ... lol

                And what does “atomic fire” have to do with it again? Einstein did not invent the atomic bobma. And there is nothing relativistic - there is about the fission of uranium atomic nuclei.
                Definitions ask him bully Energy in the sense of radiation (like a photon) does not have mass.
                unless it's about kinetic, etc.

                I will now also build a strange-looking "transcendental shed with ghosts" not on sand but on Gukov's "stone" and then I will start ranting about "assumptions" ...
                There are no Newton’s laws in old physics textbooks, there are Newton-Hook’s laws, in even older ones-Hook-Newton’s laws, and in very old ones — guess what laughing
                1. Elk
                  Elk
                  +2
                  April 19 2015 13: 28
                  Well, maybe your thermodynamics went under "fire water" as well ...

                  But to be rude to strangers is not worth it. This is at least stupid.
                  As for the rest ... Take physics textbooks for grades 6-11 of a comprehensive school (preferably Soviet), study carefully, and then try to write something on the forum.
                  So far, you have not demonstrated anything but your own dense ignorance.
                  1. -3
                    April 19 2015 15: 04
                    Well, why? Your demonstrated ...
                  2. +4
                    April 19 2015 16: 33
                    Vyacheslav
                    it looks like the level of degradation of education has reached its historical maximum. This generation of "pi" has long touched me with its dense stupidity and immeasurable conceit. I got a couple of ignoramuses who do not understand anything further than a calculator, but they picked up smart words and acquired intelligent typing systems, so they are clever at all. Drinking with them is as rewarding as trying to explain the basics of geometry to a donkey. I think it's time to finish, because reading the comments of these "specialists" has ceased to amuse me.
                    1. -2
                      April 19 2015 16: 51
                      the field of "nuclear forces" does not tear you apart? they are so strong ... only that's why they act when very close. in such a case, according to what law they decrease when they are spherical, in a vacuum bully there is distance force - there is also its field. its explicit formula here please, as is the case with Coulomb.

                      quarks of different colors already began to draw in a madhouse ...
                    2. Elk
                      Elk
                      +1
                      April 19 2015 21: 46
                      Alexander, this is no longer touching, this already makes the hair stand on end in all places. Not so long ago, purely by chance, I found the Gdrovsky drawing board in excellent condition, and I pinned this dream of my student youth to us. So, he came to us "like an engineer" from those departments (he graduated from the same faculty as me, but 15 years later). He stared at this miracle, and then asked: "What is it?" Well, in general, I had no words, only emotions ... And about the calculator, you are mistaken. Alas, I am not young, retirement is not far off, but sorry muah, I know a compass, solidus and matkad much better than the vast majority of modern graduates.
                      It’s impossible not to occupy oneself, the worst thing is that they don’t want to learn from their mistakes ...
                      1. -3
                        April 19 2015 22: 53
                        the explicit formula of the field of nuclear "forces" of strong interaction here please,
                        any "potential functions" are not interested
                        antworten sie bitte
                      2. +3
                        April 20 2015 12: 25
                        Quote: Elk
                        Alas, I'm not young, retirement is just around the corner
                        As I understand you, colleague ...

                        I know a compass, solid and matkad much better than the vast majority of modern graduates.
                        The trick is that our generation can master a lot, even on the threshold of retirement, but what the current one will do when we are gone, I can’t even imagine. I often ask my students whether they are not afraid to live in the world that they themselves will create. They look, listen, clap their eyes and ... again into their mobile phones. So we have such "specialists" and scientists, for whom gravity is a strong interaction. It's a pity and a shame ...
                      3. -3
                        April 20 2015 14: 22
                        Quote: Alex
                        So we have such "specialists" and scientists, for whom gravity is a strong interaction. It's a pity and a shame ...

                        Yes indeed.
                        They asked about the explicit form of the "strong interaction" (nuclear) forces, about the fact that gravity is a strong interaction - no one wrote, it is force. The power is there. As well as Coulomb.
                        Do not confuse "strong" with power ... you are confused, but you still try not to confuse yourself. laughing Or not confuse others.
                2. +3
                  April 19 2015 16: 28
                  Quote: Scraptor
                  And what does “atomic fire” have to do with it again? Einstein did not invent the atomic bobma. And there is nothing relativistic - there is about the fission of uranium atomic nuclei.
                  Yes, even if the energy release during nuclear decay is the result of a mass defect - a direct consequence of the Einstein relation E = mc ^ 2.

                  Everything else written by you is just nonsense.
                  1. -5
                    April 19 2015 16: 40
                    There is the instability of the nuclei of some isotopes. It's nonsense to bring a product under a more than abstract formula. Moreover, it was not used in its development laughing And to bring it under some anti-flesh theories of the one who spied on this product at a German university and then snitched about it to the American prezik, this is generally "chutzpes" ... But the point is that it goes almost completely ...
                    1. Elk
                      Elk
                      +1
                      April 20 2015 23: 07
                      There is the instability of the nuclei of some isotopes.

                      So what? Well, there is "instability" (by the way, where did it come from?), Well, these atoms collapsed, then what? Where did the energy come from, and in such a wild amount?
                      1. -3
                        April 21 2015 09: 10
                        Instability came from the unstable core design. Since there is energy, that is, strength, in this case, its formula here, please. Once again I ask ... bully
                        A capacitor has energy, there is an electrostatic force.
                        Is it clear now? What is the nuclear force in the nucleus? Outside the core (as inside), it decreases in how?
                      2. Elk
                        Elk
                        +1
                        April 21 2015 10: 37
                        Instability came from the unstable core design.

                        Simple as that! No, I'm wrong, you are not a school, chatterbox, you need to be in a nursery.
                        And energy in a chain reaction is taken from a mass defect. Simply, in nuclear fission, the total mass of the obtained nuclei and emitted corpuscles is less than the mass of the nucleus of the original. And it is this Δm that gives out electromagnetic radiation with energy exactly according to the formula E = Δm * c².
                      3. -4
                        April 21 2015 12: 22
                        Everything is much simpler - after annihilation of the electron-positron pair, the mass is generally absent.

                        You have already been explained at the "manger". If there are some "intranuclear forces", it is "strong interaction", then where is their formula? Forces are F, E - not interested.
                        Formula "F" here come on, elf! laughing
                      4. Elk
                        Elk
                        +1
                        April 21 2015 12: 28
                        You have already been explained at the "manger".

                        Baby, I didn’t drink with you at Brudershaft, therefore, please contact as expected.
                        You have already been explained at the "manger". If there are some "intranuclear forces", it is "strong interaction", then where is their formula? Forces are F, E - not interested.
                        Formula "F" here come on, elf!

                        I repeat, your place in the younger nursery group.
                      5. +3
                        April 21 2015 15: 40
                        Vyacheslav, come on, you prove to this flawed that he is an ignoramus. One can prove something only if the student understands that he does not understand something (does not know). This case is a purely clinical phenomenon, the result is unattainable in principle.
                      6. -2
                        April 21 2015 16: 08
                        do you think you would become

                        some even in the younger nursery group know how F differs from E
                        formula of the nuclear field of the force point here please! bully

                        Quote: Scraptor
                        Alex from Eustace:
                        hid in an emergency - load sunflowers with barrels, and do not stink from there. feel
                      7. -2
                        April 23 2015 11: 56
                        Where does it come from when a capacitor explodes? Non-nuclear EMR bombs still work on this principle.
          2. kompotnenado
            -1
            April 19 2015 15: 15
            Do not confuse SRT and GR. Lorentz Transformation is STO. GR is highly doubtful. Not experimentally confirmed.
    2. +4
      April 18 2015 11: 53
      Quote: Oops
      this is NEVER talked about. Like the work of Russians on the creation of lasers! ..

      This is where and when they do not talk about Nobel Prize winners Academicians Basov and Prokhorov? Yes, any article (from popular to scientific) begins with their classic experiments.
    3. Elk
      Elk
      +1
      April 19 2015 07: 20
      but they NEVER talk about it.

      This is ALWAYS talked about. Moreover, in any textbook (normal) the background of the appearance of SRT is described on the very first pages.
  6. -3
    April 18 2015 07: 35
    Perhaps Einstein’s discoveries are simply inhuman; not everyone understands them.
    1. +3
      April 18 2015 08: 01
      Quote: Semenov
      Einstein’s discoveries are simply inhuman; not everyone understands them.

      Weak to list? wink
      1. -1
        April 18 2015 10: 57
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Weak to list?



        For example, a hand (or rather a head laughing ) attached to the Philadelphia experiment.


        1. +4
          April 18 2015 12: 42
          Quote: Athenogen
          (or rather laughing head) applied to the Philadelphia experiment.

          Cool fairy tale! But it was not Einstein who put his "head" on it, but Paul Ziller! laughing And before him, Stuart Raffill.
    2. 0
      April 19 2015 02: 47
      Quote: Semenov
      Perhaps Einstein’s discoveries are simply inhuman; not everyone understands them.

      Actually, the discoveries of Einstein, like, for example, the discovery of the atomic nucleus by Rutherford or, for example, the discovery of the fission of the nucleus of Otto Gan or Newton’s law of universal gravitation, I honestly don’t know ... But Einstein’s contribution to the explanation of physical phenomena cannot be overestimated. His work on the photoelectric effect is simply brilliant. We were given lectures on earlier, pre-Einstein attempts to explain the phenomenon of the photoelectric effect. It is cumbersome, not strict, not at odds with experiment ... Along the way, Einstein gave birth to a new mathematical method - tensor analysis. I made the whole brain with these tensors at one time sad and more than once cursed this Einstein with his tensorsam...
      1. -4
        April 19 2015 06: 14
        ascribe to him yet that he discovered America ...
  7. nvv
    nvv
    -1
    April 18 2015 07: 49
    Einstein.
    Great and powerful.
    Forger.
    1. +9
      April 18 2015 09: 00
      What is so weak, just RenTV? Give TV3! Einstein will also be an alien there.
      1. nvv
        nvv
        0
        April 18 2015 09: 28
        Quote: Dagen
        What is so weak, just RenTV? Give TV3! Einstein will also be an alien there.

        Shown on RenTV. And Sergey Sall comments.
        Take a look.
        To the best of your understanding, you can learn something new, unknown.
        Believe everything and don’t trust anyone.
        1. +2
          April 18 2015 11: 13
          The nonsense shown in the video, some gang of bankers could financially stimulate their point of view in the West, but in the USSR, with its one of the best physical schools, fuel-free energy did not find something and continued to burn coal and invested in research on thermonuclear fusion considering it the most promising in the field of energy.
          1. nvv
            nvv
            +1
            April 18 2015 12: 04
            Quote: Egorchik
            some gang of bankers could financially stimulate their point of view in the west,

            91st nonsense?
            The fact that they saddled Russia is the same nonsense?
    2. +4
      April 18 2015 13: 25
      Within the framework of the prize “For Fidelity to Science” on February 10, 2015, the REN TV channel won a tight battle with TV-3 and the National Association for Genetic Safety and received the Antipremiya for disseminating pseudoscientific information. As one of the leading television channels said last year, "I have no task of educating the viewer ... We do not misinform, we inform."
      http://geektimes.ru/post/245722/
      You can continue to throw videos with horseradish tv
      1. nvv
        nvv
        -1
        April 18 2015 13: 41
        I can not help but answer. Not in my rules.
        Question.
        When you receive information, do you believe everything?
        Take for example Zhirik. I look, listen, and to the best of my understanding, I am looking for a rational kernel. And I find.
        But this requires at least some initial knowledge in the world order.
        I found them.
        And you?
        If interested, I can help.
        1. +3
          April 18 2015 21: 03
          You understand. For study, you can take textbooks, encyclopedias, books, or you can dig through garbage cans. In the latter case, you will also receive information and experience. But they will be with a shower. I still recommend starting with books, although it’s more difficult.
          1. nvv
            nvv
            +1
            April 19 2015 03: 32
            Quote: clidon
            You understand. For study, you can take textbooks, encyclopedias, books, or you can dig through garbage cans. In the latter case, you will also receive information and experience. But they will be with a shower. I still recommend starting with books, although it’s more difficult.

            I am not a "white bone".
            "Darling" is not a hindrance.
            In a samai reading country, there was tension with cognitive literature.
            I read everything in my spare time.
            90s, completely discouraged the craving for reading, that "literature" that was dumped on the shelves.
            But there was an Internet, as you put it, garbage
            Do not despise dogs, because they are poking around in the trash.

            They don’t eat everything. They find what they need.
            1. Elk
              Elk
              +3
              April 19 2015 07: 48
              "Darling" is not a hindrance.

              This is in vain. The danger of such channels as "RenTV" lies precisely in the fact that they take scientifically grounded things, add their own "zest" sucked from the finger, turn it all inside out and serve it up as truth. As a result, we have porridge in fragile brains.
              But there was an Internet, as you put it, garbage

              The Internet is not garbage, the Internet is a mirror of our world. Yes, there you can find something that sways, but you do not live in a cesspool?
  8. 0
    April 18 2015 08: 11
    Yes, this is one of the brightest talents of the Earth. Thanks to him, the world has looked beyond the new horizons of science.
  9. +2
    April 18 2015 08: 13
    Albert Einstein 1879-1955
    1. nvv
      nvv
      -4
      April 18 2015 08: 23
      Quote: bionik
      Albert Einstein 1879-1955

      The inscription begs.
      "How did I fuck you all? Fuckers"
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      April 18 2015 10: 56
      One minus mine.
  11. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. +5
        April 18 2015 08: 57
        Quote: MIKHAN
        And they are patriots of Russia! T

        Of course! laughing
        1. nvv
          nvv
          +1
          April 18 2015 09: 09
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Quote: MIKHAN
          And they are patriots of Russia! T

          Of course! laughing

          Sad thoughts come. We are run by "Russians", of course with Russian surnames.
          And after a while there will be only "Russians" cut off.
  12. +4
    April 18 2015 08: 24
    Quote: nvv
    Einstein.
    Great and powerful.
    Forger.

    And what can you think of a thread besides frankly Nazi comments, or is it not your opinion to think?
    Yes, and less RENT, look, this threatens with atrophy of the brain, they seriously talked about the development of combat ghosts in the USSR)
    1. nvv
      nvv
      -3
      April 18 2015 08: 59
      Quote: denni
      And what can you think of a thread besides frankly Nazi comments

      And I'm not an anti-Jew.
      I respect as a people.
      I am an anti-Semite.
      I hate lies.
      I don’t watch TV for a long time.
      And a miracle !!! My head began to think.
      1. Shirioner
        +4
        April 18 2015 09: 37
        For some reason, being a Russian patriot almost always means being an anti-Semite. I just saw the headline about Einstein, I immediately thought that now I read Nazi comments in the forum. Hunch did not deceive me, alas ...
        1. 0
          April 18 2015 09: 41
          Yes, indeed, why? bully

          and how is a "Russian patriot" so immediately an "anti-Semite"?
        2. nvv
          nvv
          -1
          April 18 2015 10: 39
          Separate, the word Jew and the words ..... (I can not write this word, look at (9)
          And everything will fall into place.
        3. 0
          April 18 2015 13: 12
          “People who enjoy marching to the sounds of a march have gotten their brains in vain, they could easily get by with one spinal cord.” “That says it all.
          1. nvv
            nvv
            +2
            April 18 2015 14: 02
            Quote: fider
            “People who enjoy marching to the sounds of a march have gotten their brains in vain, they could easily get by with one spinal cord.” “That says it all.

            In. That says it all.
            This is your age-old dream.
            But to your great regret, the roof of knowledge has worn off, and there is nothing left to do but call Natsik and other miscellaneous rubbish.
            Notice, this is not from a big mind. And maybe the essence of the falsifiers is manifested?
          2. 0
            April 19 2015 05: 26
            It is interesting that many who participate in this dispute do not understand the essence of the theory of relativity. In order to understand it, the rudiments of genius are also necessary ... I personally do not understand ...
            1. -4
              April 19 2015 06: 31
              everything is elementary Watson, the point is that you were "deceived"
              confused warm (space) with soft (time)
              if people had only hearing, when explaining (or denying) supersonic phenomena, one could not make tacoe.
              Well, something like this.
        4. +1
          April 18 2015 13: 21
          You are too dubious, comrade, and fixated on yourself and your country.

          Perhaps for the Israelis this is also why the S-300 deal in Iran is also against Israel. Iran (and Russia) in the first line against the United States makes a deal.
        5. kompotnenado
          -1
          April 18 2015 16: 44
          Accusations of anti-Semitism in criticizing any Jew are Jewish hutspa.
        6. +2
          April 19 2015 05: 23
          All these pseudo-patriots are lovers of the nation, and true patriots love their homeland.
          Thanks to them abroad, including Israel, left a lot of smart, energetic, passionate people. Which should have worked for the good of Russia. And these frogs have already gotten their croaking. For a long time in Russia with this approach to people there will be a mess. They do not understand that the main asset of any country is its people.
          Thanks to them, they left the country: economist Vasily Leontyev, composer Sergey Rakhmaninov, philosopher Ivan Ilyin, writer Ivan Shmelev, aircraft designer Igor Sikorsky, inventor of television Vladimir Zvorykin, etc. The list goes on for a long time to come ...
          1. -4
            April 19 2015 06: 23
            True patriots first love their family, then other darling relatives, then the nation, then their homeland.

            These comrades fled from the non-Russian terror of the Bolshevik-Trotskyists.
  13. -6
    April 18 2015 09: 21
    A forger who robbed Mileva, stole ideas at the patent office, a swindler infuriated by the Jewish press.
  14. -2
    April 18 2015 09: 25
    Einstein is the most titled thief. He stole the results from Poincaré, Maxwell, Neviside and passed off as his own, and the Zionists both then and now shut their mouths to anyone who says at least a word of truth. Researchers in the history of science are well aware of this.
    1. +1
      April 18 2015 16: 51
      By the way, with the union at the Academy of Sciences it was forbidden to criticize Einstein.
      1. nvv
        nvv
        0
        April 18 2015 18: 21
        Quote: Rivares
        By the way, with the union at the Academy of Sciences it was forbidden to criticize Einstein.

        Well, find the answer to your koment.
        Only myself.
        Why?
        1. +2
          April 18 2015 21: 31
          Well, I did not pose a question in the comments. Once I looked at materials on the theory of relativity. I came across a ban at the academy to criticize Einstein's theory of relativity. Rather, the postulates of the theory of relativity. By the way, now these postulates are disproved. In particular, the constancy of the speed of light and the rectilinear propagation of light.
          1. Elk
            Elk
            0
            April 19 2015 08: 03
            In particular, the constancy of the speed of light and the rectilinear propagation of light.

            But from this moment in more detail, please.
            1. -2
              April 19 2015 12: 19
              Quote: Elk
              In particular, the constancy of the speed of light and the rectilinear propagation of light.
              But from this moment in more detail, please.

              Contrary to popular belief and despite the well-established name, the theory of relativity is in fact a theory of typical absoluteness, in which new ones were immediately erected in place of the old overthrown absolutes (which is usually preferred to be hushed up). By the way, the founder of quantum theory Max Planck paid attention to this characteristic feature of the scientific brainchild of Albert Einstein: one of his works on this topic was called "From the relative to the absolute"

              http://www.shaping.ru/mku/deminart03.asp

              http://scienceblog.ru/2008/08/25/oprovergnuta-teoriya-otnositelnosti-skorost-vyi
              she-skorosti-sveta /
              1. 0
                April 19 2015 12: 54
                neutrinos fly above the speed of light ... Oops! bully
                1. Elk
                  Elk
                  0
                  April 19 2015 22: 15
                  neutrinos fly above the speed of light ... Oops! bully

                  Well, again. We heard a jingle, but don’t know where it is.
                  About five years ago, there was such a statement, but after verification it was not confirmed.
                  1. -2
                    April 19 2015 22: 56
                    but I think you’re simply deaf ... because supernova explosions pinpoint neutrino bursts and turn the telescope on them until the light has reached them.

                    the neutrino velocity is higher than the speed of a photon in a vacuum.
                  2. -2
                    April 19 2015 23: 21
                    ... years so at least since the 1980s, and that anyone 5 years has not been confirmed is already their problem. bully
                    1. Elk
                      Elk
                      +1
                      April 20 2015 00: 10
                      Read what neutrinos are and stop writing nonsense. By God, you look like a five-year-old child trying to talk about the problems of smelting high-alloy steel by electroslag remelting.
                      http://neutrino-history.narod.ru/
                      1. -2
                        April 20 2015 00: 22
                        explicit formula for the field of strong interaction when will it be?

                        this link is definitely not child pornography?
                        maybe there is something about neutrino astronomy still at the MiR station?
                        you have some kind of fixation on the number 5.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. -2
                April 19 2015 17: 40
                Quote: Elk
                But from this moment in more detail, please.


                http://scienceblog.ru/2008/08/25/
                oprovergnuta-teoriya-otnositelnosti-skorost-vyishe-skorosti-sveta /

                working link
                There still read the comments of scientists.
              4. Elk
                Elk
                +1
                April 19 2015 22: 05
                According to the first article.
                The answer to the question: what is fire (or darkness) cannot be found either in textbooks, or in reference books, or in encyclopedias (with the exception of explanatory or mythological dictionaries, where either an explanation of the terms or information about pre-scientific beliefs and ideas is given).

                After this quote, you can no longer read. For the writer of these things has the same relation to physics as I do to ballet.
                All that is written below is just a word game, not even mathematics, but just words.
                But the theory of relativity and SRT, and GR have experimental evidence. Yes, not everything is so smooth and it seems that they have already felt the limits of applicability of these theories, but this is just the normal process of cognition.
                Regarding the second article.
                It is written by a clearly illiterate journalist, avid for catchy headlines. For one simple reason: neither SRT nor GR are applicable to QUANTUM effects. This is precisely the headache of modern physics, which is so far impossible to combine quantum mechanics and general relativity.
                1. -2
                  April 20 2015 00: 08
                  Quote: Elk
                  For one simple reason: neither SRT nor GR are applicable to QUANTUM effects. This is precisely the headache of modern physics, which is so far impossible to combine quantum mechanics and general relativity.

                  Dear Elk, do you know if physicists have broken so many copies about this theory ... let's leave this process to more prepared people in classrooms so as not to break our fingers on the keyboard (or vice versa) in front of each other, anyway I suspect that we will remain with their opinions. I will give you two links
                  contradictions in the works of Einstein:
                  http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/texsts/rus/stat/st3514.pdf
                  and a funny link about him:
                  http://lurkmore.to/Теория_относительности
                  PS To criticize or defend THEORY is an thankless task. Either life itself will reject the theory by the accumulated facts, or it will translate it into law. And while neither one nor the other has happened, let us take on something more positive.
                  1. Elk
                    Elk
                    +1
                    April 20 2015 13: 14
                    To criticize or defend THEORY is an thankless task. Either life itself will reject the theory by accumulated facts, or it will translate it into law

                    Honestly, I, in general, do not care: Einstein is right or wrong (but most likely right, albeit not in everything), whether he plagiarized his theories or not (most likely not). I don't give a damn about what our country is turning into. Read the comments (and not only on this topic), 75 percent of the people have an absolutely mythologized picture of the world in the absence of critical thinking. Yes, it was not formed on the theory of biblical creation, but this only makes it worse. When "RenTV" programs are presented as an argument, this is already a diagnosis.
                    And about the theories of Einstein ... You know, once, it was a long time ago, I first met them and I didn’t like them. I started digging deeper as my modest abilities began, picking a lot of things, including contradictions, and limitations, but in place the conclusions of these theories have DIRECT EXPERIMENTAL confirmation, but all attempts to conduct an experiment DIRECTLY REFUTING STO or GRT have failed. And do not yell about the Zionist conspiracy, it was not one dozen experiments.
                    We have a clean
          2. nvv
            nvv
            0
            April 19 2015 08: 25
            Quote: Rivares
            Well, I did not pose a question in the comments

            What's up?
            Put it.
            1. -1
              April 19 2015 12: 33
              Well, if you answer more broadly, the development of science and society is governed by the consequence of financing the "necessary" directions and suppressing the "unnecessary" + informational advertising (of the Nobel laureates of physics, everyone knows the hyped Einstein for sure, the less educated will name 1-2 more and that's it !!! Who will name 10 Russian Nobel laureates?)
              Another striking example is the economy! There are so many "great" Americans there, and no one knows what to do in a crisis and when the next one will come.
  15. -4
    April 18 2015 09: 34
    Einstein was a good guy. But the simite circles made an icon out of him (by the way, contrary to his desire). Therefore, now we are reading about the genius of genius.
    1. +3
      April 18 2015 13: 47
      Quote: Yukon
      But simit circles made an icon out of him (by the way, contrary to his desire)

      Announce his "desire" to us, and I, in turn, will smear you on the wall with facts. fellow
      1. -1
        April 18 2015 14: 25
        he had a desire to make an icon of him?
      2. kompotnenado
        0
        April 18 2015 15: 16
        Einstein did not bring anything significant to physics. In addition to its popularization. But the programs that bankers banned broadcast are ridiculous. The foundations of SRT are laid by the Michelson-Morley experience and the Lorentz transformations, which are rumored to have been deduced by Poincare, the teacher of Lorentz. Einstein here in the role of tearing kush, a gesheftik on other people's works. And the nobel for the photoelectric effect is just a Jewish hutspa.
  16. 0
    April 18 2015 10: 24
    I read a lot of options on the topic. I didn’t make up my mind. But it seems, I am inclined to those who suggest not to PR.
  17. -1
    April 18 2015 13: 37
    I am not interested in Einstein himself, as in the time in which he was born. It was this period of time that brought into our world new discoveries and amazing inventions. And the time was hard to say: crises, world and civil wars, revolutions. Still referring to this topic, I am indescribable delight from the unreality of what is happening, what great people, what grandiose deeds! Today, much of what has been predicted in theories and outstanding experiments is becoming a reality, isn't it wonderful!
  18. +2
    April 18 2015 15: 17
    That's what they don't like when they talk about the greats, so that they begin to delve into their personal lives, stir up "milen" ... They (the greats) in everyday life could be notorious abominations (the same Newton, by the way), but how is it changes what they brought to humanity?
    so, here it was necessary to talk about physics, but about "milena" somewhere else.
    1. kompotnenado
      +1
      April 18 2015 15: 35
      I specifically say that Einstein did not bring anything significant to physics. I did not understand quantum mechanics at all. GRT is a very dubious thing. The Nobel Prize for the discovery made by Stoletov is simply arrogance.
  19. -1
    April 18 2015 15: 23
    The great scientists, "on whose shoulders" Odnokamushkin stood, understood that at that time it was impossible to prove something experimentally.

    And, without experiment, there is no science. And, there is also such a thing as reputation in general and scientific reputation, in particular. What Odnokamushkin compiled and voiced could turn out to be "zilch". And, the real great scientists could not afford it, I repeat - without the possibility of real experimental confirmation.
    Let me remind you that these were the times when the electronic lamp was "just about" invented, and no one even had any thoughts about accelerators. Not to mention their practical benefits against the background of the prohibitive cost. You cannot build such a "device" in a room laboratory.

    Odnokamushkin had nothing, no scientific reputation. He was - nobody and, therefore - risked nothing. He stupidly had nothing to lose, which is why he was so brave. In case of failure, he would have remained an unknown employee of the patent office. However, he was lucky - and he "broke the bank".

    The question is - what is his "genius"? A real genius seethes with real ideas and leaves behind a School with a bunch of students. Who were Odnokamushkin's students? What further fruitful ideas did they develop?

    “Al? I can not hear!" ©
    1. kompotnenado
      -3
      April 18 2015 15: 40
      Maybe better Odnokamenev?
      1. -3
        April 18 2015 15: 57
        And, do you think that this will add weight to him in Science?
        1. kompotnenado
          -2
          April 18 2015 16: 35
          But, nevertheless, he should not be completely denied a contribution to the development of physics. The formula for the photoelectric effect is somewhere to be found.
          1. -3
            April 18 2015 16: 42
            Well, yes - the language is long. This cannot be taken away.
  20. -1
    April 18 2015 16: 49
    Albert Einstein - (1879-1955), theoretical physicist, creator of the theory of relativity, author of fundamental works on quantum theory and statistical physics, one of the founders of modern physics, foreign corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences (1922) and foreign honorary member of the USSR Academy of Sciences (1926) .

    Born in Germany, from 1893 he lived in Switzerland, from 1914 in Germany, in 1933 he emigrated to the United States. Created a private (1905) and general (1907-16) theory of relativity. The author of fundamental works on the quantum theory of light: introduced the concept of photon (1905), established the laws of the photoelectric effect, the basic law of photochemistry (Einstein's law), and predicted (1917) induced radiation. Albert Einstein developed the statistical theory of Brownian motion, laying the foundations of the theory of fluctuations, created the quantum statistics of Bose - Einstein. Since 1933 he worked on the problems of cosmology and unified field theory. In the 30s, he opposed fascism, war (World War II), in the 40s - against the use of nuclear weapons. In 1940, he signed a letter to the US president about the dangers of creating nuclear weapons in Germany, which stimulated US nuclear research. One of the initiators of the creation of the state of Israel. The Nobel Prize (1921, for works on theoretical physics, especially for the discovery of the laws of the photoelectric effect).
    And Baba Yaga is against it!
    1. -2
      April 18 2015 17: 54
      The Glorious Olmert Publishing House? "Signed" bully but they spoke no less - invented ...
  21. -2
    April 18 2015 17: 48
    How many read about him like that, and did not understand how great he is, what he invented or invented?
    1. -1
      April 18 2015 17: 51
      He’s just a PR machine, just like he is a Jew.
    2. -1
      April 18 2015 22: 13
      Einshchine drew all the views of the structure of the world
      He showed that:
      - masa and energy are mutually reversible.
      - space and time connected to the continuum
      - this continuum can twist like rubber
      - there is no gravity as a force at all - is the curvature of the continuum
      - body masa is not constant - it grows with the speed of the body
      - time can go at different speeds
      etc.
      All this sounds crazy. What if they say that you are walking along this land not due to gravity, but due to the curvature of the continuum?
      Is Ainshine right? Ask in Hiroshima. They will confirm with Nagasaki.
      1. -3
        April 19 2015 05: 57
        straight quintessence of dope ... space is 3D space and time is time.
        is bent in someone's brain, and YaB is not a "rubber bomb" even once. bully
        1. 0
          April 19 2015 12: 04
          Hiroshimi also thought so ...
          1. -3
            April 19 2015 12: 49
            in Hiroshima they thought that they were fighting with people ...

            the fission of uranium nuclei and their chain reaction, with the precession of the planetary orbits - do not correlate in any way.
  22. +2
    April 18 2015 18: 30
    There are such thoughts that the Morgans and Rotshtlds visited there.
    Ukrainian lands are bought as much as running.
  23. +4
    April 18 2015 19: 06
    And what evidence is there that his theory is plagiarism? Film on Rent and work in the patent office? Not much. When our Mikhail Timofeevich Kalashnikov is accused of plagiarism, we react nervously, because this is a lie, and we offend poor Einstein. I specially re-read his interviews during his lifetime (although I am not strong in science). I was impressed - a smart man, well-read and versatile, like our "Ascetic" smile . And in general, his face is pleasant, even in old age, I think he was a kind person.
    1. +3
      April 18 2015 19: 44
      Quote: Bijo
      And what evidence is there that his theory is plagiarized?

      What evidence can be for this nonsense? Paunkare and Lorentz himself believed that Einstein was wrong, the latter generally explained everything through the ether, which was even called Lorentzov Ether. He finalized the concepts of both scientists, and proved that they are both wrong, or rather his predictions were confirmed experimentally after a few years. They find fault with one formula of the Lorentz transformation and miss the rest of the article, whose ideas do not even come close to what Lorentz and Poincare were convinced of.
      Here is what Lorenz himself wrote
      . Referring to his work in 1904, Lorenz in 1912 wrote: “You can see that in this article I was not able to fully obtain the formula for transforming Einstein’s theory of relativity ... Einstein’s merit is that he was the first to express the principle of relativity in the form of a universal strictly and precisely acting law” Roughly speaking, Lorenz went completely to the wrong steppe, and not the fact that someday he would have come to TO
    2. 0
      April 18 2015 21: 09
      Quote: Bijo
      When our Mikhail Timofeevich Kalashnikov is accused of plagiarism, we nervously react

      Dear, but in more detail? As far as I know, adherents of plagiarism broadcast only about design, and when it comes to the principle of the machine, they pointedly prefer not to notice these differences!

      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Гипотезы_о_создании_автомата_Калашникова
      1. Elk
        Elk
        +3
        April 20 2015 18: 58
        Dear, but in more detail? As far as I know, adherents of plagiarism broadcast only about design, and when it comes to the principle of the machine, they pointedly prefer not to notice these differences!

        Yes, because in order to yell about something other than the appearance and presence of Hugo Schmeiser in Izhevsk (by the way, there are wonderful articles on this very remarkable character on VO), you need to at least know such names as McLean, Lewis, Garand, Holek, Bulkin, Sudaev. But due to the unburdened knowledge (see comments), these characters do not have the slightest idea about them. Those who are in the course understand that there are a very limited number of rational schemes of operation of one or another mechanism, and therefore all machines built according to the same scheme and for solving the same problems will be similar. It's like sharks, ichthyosaurs and dolphins.
        Do you want me to hit the stormtrooper?
        So, the Germans borrowed:
        1. Gas piston combined with the gate frame (McLinn, Lewis)
        2. Locking by a skewed shutter and a gas chamber (Cholek)
        3. USM (the one generally seamless with the ZH-30)
        Well, there you can pick up the little things ...
        1. -2
          April 21 2015 08: 39
          In essence, STG is a re-rotated SVT-40 under a weakened cartridge, with some borrowings from the systems listed above. The Germans really liked her.

          Kalashnikov only borrowed from Bulkin (he was told to do this from the Military Acceptance Office). But apart from the main thing - velograms of the bolt group. Bulkin’s shank is thick, because of this the reliability and survivability of his machine is less. Because of these borrowings, the AK-47 was officially not called the Kalashnikov assault rifle in the USSR, but the Automatic Carabiner. In addition, many more people worked in the Kalashnikov Design Bureau.
          1. Elk
            Elk
            0
            April 21 2015 10: 27
            In essence, STG is a re-rotated SVT-40 under a weakened cartridge, with some borrowings from the systems listed above. The Germans really liked her.

            Don't write nonsense. Stg44 and SVT-40 have completely different operation of the gas engine. The only thing they have in common is locking the shutter by tilting. But here, too, neither Henele's engineers nor Tokarev are pioneers.
            Kalashnikov only borrowed from Bulkin

            Another nonsense. Kalashnikov himself was subject to the fact that he took the scheme of interaction between the shutter frame and the shutter from Garand, only more than seriously modified it. USM AK is also a redesigned USM Garand M1, and that, in turn, is a redesign of the USM Browning Auto-5.
            Because of these borrowings, the AK-47 was not officially called the Kalashnikov assault rifle in the USSR

            Delirium squared. Officially, what semi-literate individuals call "AK-47" was called "7,62 mm Kalashnikov assault rifle, model 1947". And it has been called that since 1949, when it was put into service.
            a Automatic Carabiner.

            As always, they heard a ringing, but don’t know where it is. In 1944, Kalashnikov submitted his carbine to the competition. It was in him that the bolt group was later worked out, later used in the machine, but lost to the competition to Simonov, with his SCS.
            In addition, many more people worked in the Kalashnikov Design Bureau.

            You know, I somehow guessed about it, but your confirmation was not enough.
            1. -1
              April 21 2015 12: 08
              Not so stupid - they could not repeat it under the rifle cartridge, then they went simplifications.

              A comparison of the guns of Bulkin and Kalashnikov shows otherwise.

              Nothing of the kind - until relatively recently, it was called the Automatic Carabiner.

              "bad", "stupidity" - it is understandable, but about the velogram and shanks something will be?
              1. Elk
                Elk
                +1
                April 21 2015 12: 25
                "bad", "stupidity" - it is understandable, but about the velogram and shanks something will be?

                Baby, I could arrange a velogram for you, on an exercise bike, and I can cut a shank even without anesthesia. laughing
                A comparison of the guns of Bulkin and Kalashnikov shows otherwise.

                And what does this comparison show?
                Nothing of the kind - until relatively recently, it was called the Automatic Carabiner.

                Baby, bend over the crustacean, run up and dart up on the wall from all over. This is where foolishness will fly out of you ...
                1. -2
                  April 21 2015 16: 01
                  Quote: Elk
                  I could ...
                  stop littering with antlers, puffy. laughing
                  these shanks are not trimmed but turned.

                  What was written. That is, you tried to argue, as always, not just without a clue in the subject, but still not reading it?

                  Do you work as a teacher in kindergarten for the "new Russians" chtoli, perverted, and children often troll you in this way? bully
  24. +2
    April 18 2015 20: 46
    Scientific theories are not born from scratch. Einstein was lucky. A lot had been done before him. But not all ... The time of his life falls on the period of the greatest revolution in physics. Then this science could be moved while sitting in the patent office. Today his works would simply not be published due to the lack of "belonging" to an academic place. But this does not mean that he is a plagiarist. The fact is that the central question of the observer's motion in the photon's frame of reference arose in him long before he got acquainted with the works of others. It is truly foolish to deny his contribution to the foundations of physics. If you can argue about this in the field of special theory of relativity, then in quantum mechanics, general theory of relativity (the only working theory of gravity for today!), Attempts to quantize the gravitational field - puts it at the very top of physics of the 20th century. As a person, he was full of terrible flaws, which are even unpleasant to recall now because of their vulgarity. But this has nothing to do with science. There are many strange and unpleasant personalities who have done more for physics than all of us put together today. It is necessary to be able to separate it. Willy-nilly, he influenced the emergence of nuclear weapons in the world by foolishly signing a letter to the president. But even in this he is much more human than the ardent Russophobe Edward Taylor, who crippled the fate of his colleagues and the great pusher of the ideas of thermonuclear weapons aimed against the USSR.
    Spitting towards the dead scientists from one side reminds me of attempts to destroy the monuments of the Soviet era in Ukraine. Sorry, but this is shallow and flawed. We study in physics precisely the Lorentz transformation, and not Einstein. In the same place - the coordinates of Minkowski, and not furry Albert. We pay tribute to Mr. Poincare. So you don’t need to erect monuments to Einstein, and don’t need to bring them down later.
    Would there be a theory without it? This question is incorrect. But most likely there would be someone else. Later...
    1. 0
      April 18 2015 22: 27
      Duc, sobsno, no one disputes his priority.

      It’s like with the invention of the radio. Invented - Popov A.S., and patented - Guglielmo Marconi.
      Popova, ess-but in the "free world" - no one remembers.

      How not to recall the wretched Hawking (about whom the film has now been filmed), and who in the 70s still ran quite fast and was at a scientific conference in Moscow. And there the Soviet professor V.N. Gribov shared with Hawking his views on the possibility of quantum tunneling, leading to the possible evaporation of black hole matter. The fact of the conversation that took place is documented. And what? Hawking immediately, upon returning home, embossed an article, as a result of which "the whole world" now knows only "Hawking radiation." Without "some, there" Gribov. Priority is such a thing ...

      Therefore - Odnokamushkin "spun" on time, well ... well done! Who dared - he ate, as they say.

      However - what does genius have to do with it? Genius presupposes the existence of a scientific heritage that Odnokamushkin does not have.

      Even the popularized formula "E is equal to MC square" is the creation of, at least, Oliver Heaviside, and as a maximum - of several more people who came to her much earlier than Odnokamushkin.
      About the conclusion of the rest of the formulas - Odnokamushkin "does not even smell."

      So, the "sons of Israel" can at least "neglect" here, but Odnokamushkin was never a genius. One of his "static Universe" - which is worth it. Well, nothing is static in Nature! It was the ancient Greek Heraclitus who remarked: "Everything flows and everything changes ..." ©

      "Resourceful" is - yes, no one here will argue, however, this is the usual "national" trait, the result of "natural selection". Those who were "not too resourceful" - it was more difficult to survive for 2000 years, in conditions of widespread oppression of the Jews.

      It is not clear, however, why they, "so white and fluffy", were constantly and everywhere oppressed, but this is a completely different story.
  25. 0
    April 19 2015 01: 24
    Not a great and not a physicist, but a pseudo-scientist Euro-Mason !!! The author is strongly recommended to read the books of Georgy Sidorov, as well as recently published scientific works that completely refute the "theory of relativity" - in an experimental way.
  26. Dudu
    -4
    April 19 2015 10: 30
    Tired of singing the "greatness" of worthlessness. His nonsense is completely consistent with the Jewish tricks of the Talmudists - Gematria and Notarikon. Both methods are based on juggling letters and numbers for their own purposes. The same specimen performed groundless juggling with formulas. The well-known formula from the casuist reads E = mS squared. Cool? And this is just a formula for kinetic energy E = mv squared divided by 2. So, the casuist removed the two and that's it. And who and with what device will measure ALL the energy released from the mass? Who will check this formula7 Yes, there is no such device and it will not be soon. Therefore, you can write any nonsense. And he was exalted for such nonsense. Or even cooler: time decreases with increasing speed reaching the speed of light, well, and subsequent tales around this paradox of time. Well, complete nonsense, even this casuist painted the formulas, and besides, no one knows what time is.
    1. -3
      April 19 2015 13: 29
      yes, "weighed" it in full, and made everyone move at the same speed but with different mass belay love
  27. -3
    April 19 2015 10: 53
    Einstein is a dummy. They are worn with this Jew, as with a written bag. Invented nothing, just stole .... hanyga
  28. -3
    April 19 2015 21: 34
    Great quack.
    While studying his theory at the institute, the teachers and I were kidding, because everyone understood that his theory had nothing to do with reality.