Overbomb

8
The entire potential of Soviet science was invested in the product RDS-6С

It is known from published archival documents that in the initial period of the Soviet Atomic Project, two versions of the hydrogen bomb (WB) were developed: a “pipe” (RDS-6T) and a “puff” (RDS-6С). The names to a certain extent corresponded to their constructive structure.

The Yakov Zeldovich group at the Institute of Chemical Physics (ICP), and then the scientists of Laboratory No. 3 and Laboratory B, carried out calculations of the WB RDS-6T in the form of a thin-walled cylinder with a diameter of 50 centimeters and a length of at least five meters filled with liquid deuterium in quantities of 140 kilograms. According to calculations, the explosion of this mass of deuterium is equivalent to one to two million tons of TNT. An atomic bomb in a cannon version is used to initiate an explosion. Between the charge of uranium-235 and deuterium is an additional detonator from a mixture of deuterium and tritium, which reacts faster and at a lower temperature than pure deuterium. The entire system is thermally insulated so that liquid deuterium does not evaporate during transportation. Even from this description, presented by Yakov Zeldovich in the note “Hydrogen Deuterium Bomb” in February 1950, it can be seen that the implementation of the WB RDS-6Т with liquid hydrogen turned out to be associated with great technical difficulties.

The advantage of the "puff"

Igor Tamm, Yakov Zeldovich and Andrei Sakharov indicated in their report “Model of the RDS-6C product” for 1953 that the thermonuclear reaction in deuterium proceeds at the speed required for an explosion only at extremely high temperatures and has not yet proved the practical possibility to maintain them.

Due to the negative results of many years of theoretical calculations carried out, work on the WB RDS-6T was discontinued by the decision of the MSM management of the USSR in the 1954 year.

The decision to create a WB in the form of alternating layers of fissile material and thermonuclear components (hence the “puff”) was proposed by Andrei Sakharov, an employee of the theoretical department of the Physics Institute of the Academy of Sciences (FIAN), headed by Igor Tamm. 2 December 1948 of the year at a meeting of the Scientific and Technical Council (STC) of Laboratory No. 2 held a discussion of the reports of Zeldovich and Tamm on the results of studying the use of the reaction of light nuclei synthesis to create WB of various design schemes.

The minutes of the NTS meeting indicated that the council considered interesting the results of both groups, but especially the system in the form of a column of heavy water and А-9 (symbol of natural uranium), which according to preliminary calculations can detonate when the diameter of the column is about 400 millimeters. The advantage of this system is the possibility of using heavy water instead of deuterium, which eliminates the need to deal with hydrogen at low temperatures.

The decision of the NTS Laboratory No. 2 1948 of the year indicated the need to concentrate the work of Tamm's group on Sakharov's proposal and conduct experiments at FIAN in the team of Ilya Frank to study neutron multiplication in the heavy water-uranium system, freeing the team of scientists from other works.

The results of this review, Igor Kurchatov and Yuli Khariton, reported to Boris Vannikov, Chief of the First Main Directorate (PSU) under the Council of Ministers (SM) of the USSR, attaching a draft resolution of the USSR Council of Ministers, prepared on the basis of a decision of the NTS.

The discussion at the scientific seminar of the Laboratory No. 2 of the reports of Zeldovich and Tamm served as the basis for the broad development of theoretical and experimental work on the creation of the first Russian hydrogen bomb.

Paradise for theorists

WB RDS-6С in official documents was called a product, only sometimes using the true name. The RDS-6C is arranged as follows: in the center of the system of alternating layers of natural uranium and light material consisting of a mixture of deuteride and lithium-6 tritide, a charge of uranium-235 is placed. The surface of the "puff" consists of an explosive (EX) to initiate an explosion of a nuclear (uranium-235) charge, which causes a powerful flow of energy in the form of neutrons, quanta and other particles. This leads to ionization heating (compression) to stellar temperatures of a thin layer of thermonuclear fuel and a layer of uranium. The latter then turns into a plasma with a corresponding increase in pressure, which compresses the adjacent layer of light substance. Due to the combined effects of a nuclear explosion and an ionized layer of uranium, conditions for a thermonuclear reaction are created, resulting in an increase in the intensity of uranium fission by thermonuclear neutrons. A feature of this process is that it takes place in extreme conditions: with a large density of energy release in a small volume of matter at high temperature, all this develops in microseconds, which ultimately leads to an explosive effect. The computational study of the physics of complex processes occurring in the WB is a manifestation of the higher intelligence of scientists, a paradise for theorists, as Andrei Sakharov once said.

Overbomb
The first in the world hydrogen bomb RDS-6С.
Charge test conducted on August 12
1953 of the year at the Semipalatinsk test site.
Charging power - up to 400 kT
Photo: Vadim Savitsky

Thus, in the first sample of domestic WB RDS-6С, besides explosives, such nuclear materials were contained: uranium-235, natural uranium, deuteride, and lithium-6 tritide. This made it possible to ensure the implementation of the following processes: nuclear explosion of a central charge, heating as a result of spherical layers with deuteride and lithium tritide-6, thermonuclear reaction with energy release and formation of fast neutrons, fission of uranium-238 fast neutrons with energy release, lithium interaction 6 with neutrons to obtain an additional amount of tritium and thereby enhancing the primary thermonuclear reaction.

In a hydrogen bomb, numerous nuclear reactions, hydrodynamic phenomena and high-intensity thermal processes occur almost simultaneously. Obviously, due to the lack of methods for analyzing them and reliable information on the interaction constants of particles, the calculation of the explosion of the WB presented considerable theoretical difficulties. Nevertheless, Soviet scientists and engineers managed to create the first domestic WB, which is the most complex technical device in the world.

Principles of work organization

The activities to create the first hydrogen bomb in the Soviet Union had a number of features. First of all, all participants in this work, regardless of their official position, had a high level of responsibility, understanding the exceptional military-political importance of having a super-bomb as one of the effective means of protecting the country from external threats.

Of course, the state centralization and coordination of all enterprises and organizations, as well as the maximum possible financing of work, including generous material incentives for the results, played a huge role in achieving success. And all this with strict control of performance. The high potential of pre-war Soviet science, especially nuclear physics, the presence of a large number of highly skilled scientists and engineers was of great importance.

Achievements of nuclear physics are constantly used to solve actual problems of national defense. In general, without the results of basic research, the creation of such a high-tech product, such as WB RDS-6С and subsequent improved WB samples, would be impossible. It is known that the director of the Leningrad Physicotechnical Institute (LFTI), academician Abram Ioffe, in the pre-war years, was reprimanded for research in nuclear physics as not giving a practical exit. But it was precisely the pre-war fundamental research that allowed the Soviet Union to obtain advanced weapon.

Outstanding scientists of various specialties took part in the creation of the first Russian WB, among which such famous physicists as Igor Kurchatov, Yuli Khariton, Yakov Zeldovich, Kirill Shchelkin, Igor Tamm, Andrei Sakharov, Vitaly Ginzburg, Lev Landau, Evgeny Zababakhin should be mentioned. , Yuri Romanov, Georgy Flerov, Ilya Frank, Alexander Shalnikov, and others.

The principal feature of the work on the RDS-6 was the participation in them of a large number of highly qualified Soviet mathematicians, such as Nikolai Bogolyubov, Ivan Vinogradov, Leonid Kantorovich, Mstislav Keldysh, Andrei Kolmogorov, Ivan Petrovsky and many, many others. All the color of Soviet science was attracted to the creation of the first national WB. The active participation of a large number of scientific, design and production teams of the country with experienced personnel made it possible to solve the most complex high-tech tasks. The appearance of VB would not have been possible without commercially available lithium-6, deuterium, tritium and their compounds — the main components of thermonuclear weapons, methods for isolating tritium from irradiated lithium, etc.

New ideas, designs of plants, research and development plans, reports of directors of institutes on the work performed were discussed at seminars and scientific councils of Laboratory No. 2, NTS PGU and NTS at KB-11, etc. All government decisions were drawn up on the basis of recommendations of NTS PGU and NTS at KB-11 after approbation of the leadership of the PGU and the Special Committee. The practice of constant collegial discussion of new proposals at NTS meetings led to the elimination of a large gap between ideas and their implementation.

The Soviet Atomic Project was distinguished by a broad program of diverse basic research with the construction of experimental nuclear reactors and installations, particle accelerators, etc., the results of which were immediately used in the performance of specific tasks. At the same time, enormous funds were spent on basic research.

Personally responsible

The solution of state tasks on the creation of nuclear-hydrogen weapons was largely made possible by the urgent measures of the Soviet government to organize an effective structure for the centralized management of the Nuclear Project. 20 August 1945 was established by the Special Committee (SC, led by Laurenti Beria) under the State Defense Committee and the First Main Directorate (PGU, headed by former People's Commissar for Munitions Boris Vannikov) under SNK USSR. As a result, the following cycle of management of the Atomic Project was implemented: production enterprises, institutes, design organizations - Scientific and Technical Council (STC) PGU - PSU - Special Committee - USSR Council of Ministers. Work on the creation of WB RDS-6С was constantly monitored by the Special Committee and PGU. After the information letter of Vannikov and Kurchatov about the principal possibility of creating a super-bomb, the Special Committee and PSU repeatedly considered the state of the developments of the World Bank and, if necessary, prepared resolutions and orders of the Council of Ministers. The 1950 – 1953 years were issued by the 26 decrees and orders of the USSR Council of Ministers on scientific, industrial and organizational issues of the development of WB RDS-6С. Such a large number of government decisions in other areas of the Atomic Project were not issued. Most of them belong to the works of KB-11 as the main executing organization, where, over time, the order of work developed, determined by decrees of the USSR Council of Ministers and orders of the management of KB-11. February 8 1949 Head of KB-11 Pavel Zernov signed an order for work at KB-11 on RDS-6, paragraph 1 of which provided for the organization of the group “under the direct supervision of Chief Designer Yu. B. Khariton to further develop questions on creating RDS-6 in the following composition: Yu. B. Khariton (head), K. I. Shchelkin, Ya. B. Zeldovich, N. L. Dukhov, V. I. Alferov, A. S. Kozyrev, E. I. Zababakhin, G N. Flerov, L. V. Altshuler, V. A. Tsukerman, V. A. Davidenko, D. A. Frank-Kamenetsky, A. I. Abramov ”.

A year later, the government appointed a supervisor and his deputy responsible for specific areas of work. The status of the supervisor who was introduced in the Soviet Atomic Project was very high, as evidenced, for example, by Igor Kurchatov’s activities. Clause 2 of the Resolution of the USSR CM No. 827-303cc / op “On works on creating RDS-6” from February 26 1950 of the year: “To approve the corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Y. B as scientific supervisor of works on creating RDS-6С and RDS-6T Khariton, First Deputy Scientific Director for the creation of RDS-6С and RDS-6Т, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, KI Shchelkin, Deputy Scientific Director for RDS-6С products, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR I.E. Tamm, Deputy Scientific Director for the calculated-theoretical part of the RDS-6T of the corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences USSR Ya. B. Zeldovich, Deputy Head of Research for Nuclear Processes of the candidate of physical and mathematical sciences M. G. Meshcheryakov and candidate of physical and mathematical sciences G. N. Flerov.

Also, the resolution approved the personal composition of the accountants, in paragraph 4 of which we read the following: “Organize a theoretical-calculating group in KB-11 to develop the theory of the RDS-6C product under the direction of corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR I. Ye. Tamm Sakharov - Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, S. Z. Belenky - Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Yu. A. Romanov - Researcher, N. N. Bogolyubova - Academician of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, I. Ya. Pomeranchuk - Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences , V.N. Klimova - Scientific Collaboration and, Shirkov - researcher. "

According to the plan 1949 – 1950

Thus, in the works on RDS-6, besides KB-11, the leading scientific experts from the institutes of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR participated. As a result, the following implementing organizations were under the scientific direction of KB-11 for computational and experimental studies in support of the WDS RDS-6C project: Institute of Physics, Institute of Physical Problems (IHF), Laboratory No. 1, Laboratory No. 2, Laboratory B, Mathematical Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences with the Leningrad Branch, Institute of Geophysics of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Scientific research institute-8, Scientific research institute-9, LFTI, GSPI-11, GSPI-12, VIAM, NIIgrafit, and manufacturing enterprises took part in the work on reactor technology and technological aspects of the production of fusion components, as well as manufacturing enterprises: plant No. 817, plant No. 12, plant No. 418, Plant No. 752, Verkhne-Salda Metallurgical Plant, Novosibirsk Chemical Concentrates Plant.

The administrative and scientific leadership of the Soviet Atomic Project energetically set about organizing work to create the first Russian WB RDS-6. The first representative meeting on RDS-6 was held on 9 on June 1949 of the year under the leadership of Vannikov and Kurchatov in KB-11 (Arzamas-16). In addition to leading scientists of the Atomic Project, they invited Sakharov. The meeting participants developed the “RDS-6 Research Plan for 1949 – 1950” (in handwritten form, prepared by Sakharov’s handwriting), which includes the following research areas: nuclear reactions of light nuclei in RDS-6; the possibility of initiating RDS-6 using an atomic bomb and conventional explosives; the use of an atomic bomb explosion to obtain information concerning the creation of a WB; gas dynamics process. Along with theoretical works, the performers and the timeframe for the development of industrial technologies for obtaining tritium, lithium-6, lithium deuteride, and uranium deuteride were also determined, which are necessary for the creation of RDS-6.

The hydrogen bomb model RDS-6С was successfully tested at the Semipalatinsk test site 12 in August 1953.

The capacity of the first Soviet AB RDS-1, which was a copy of the American AB, was 20 thousand tons of TNT equivalent. The total TNT equivalent of AB RDS-2 of the original Soviet design was 38 300 tons. The power of the first WB RDS-6C exceeded the TNT equivalent of AB RDS-2 by almost 10 times, which undoubtedly was a major achievement of Soviet developers of nuclear weapons. Subsequently, the design principles of WB RDS-6С were seriously improved, it allowed to create more powerful weapons.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 12 2015 08: 32
    Sakharov and those who developed this bomb with him were geniuses. A terrible invention of destruction, but at the same time a guardian of the world. Paradox. hi
    1. +3
      April 12 2015 09: 28
      Quote: NEXUS
      Sakharov and those who developed this bomb with him were geniuses. A terrible invention of destruction, but at the same time a guardian of the world. Paradox. hi

      Sakharov called his works "Paradise for theorists!"
      I can imagine what impression the "theorists" got at the sight of tests of their developments and
      their results! No wonder that this could affect the psyche of some creators ...
      Yes, Elena Bonner, as a wife ...
      Sakharov, as I see it, was a very unhappy person ... A brilliant scientist who understood
      the value of peace and human life, not understood by the party elite, and taken under guardianship
      Western special services and "human rights activists" who made him the banner of their struggle ...
      But he turned out to be higher, did not become a traitor, but to the end remained the way he is!
      And unfortunately incomprehensible until the end of life!
      1. +2
        April 12 2015 13: 05
        Quote: AlNikolaich
        Sakharov called his works "Paradise for theorists!"

        ... nevertheless, the ways of creating practical "fusion" went in completely different directions (the so-called "two-stage, three-stage schemes")!

        Sakhorov's Sloika turned out to be the same dead-end branch, limiting itself to the notorious 400kt.

        Sakharov's scheme provided for the use of cheap uranium-238 as an effective nuclear material, which was considered as garbage in the manufacture of the atomic bomb. The cost of a kiloton of TE energy of the working substance decreases many times. The phenomenon of ionization compression of thermonuclear fuel, which became the basis of the first Soviet hydrogen bomb, is still called "saccharification".
        The idea of ​​“puff” was first put forward by Teller, then in 1948 A. D. Sakharov, then British scientists.
        But, being a dead end branch of the development of thermonuclear systems, it died out in the USSR after the American tests of Ivy Mike and Castle Bravo. According to the “puff” scheme, an RDS-6с bomb was created in the Soviet Union. Tested 12 August 1953, 400 ct.

        Tritium-enhanced bomb:
        40 CT - trigger, 60-80 CT synthesis, the rest is the division of uranium shells; 250 CT without tritium.

        In England, this method resulted in the Orange Herald (31 May 1957, 720 ct: 300 ct - trigger), but this is probably almost the ceiling for this scheme.

        By the way, Ginzburg, Aleksandrov and Lavrentiev are called the father of "Russian thermonuclear".

        Further, the development of thermonuclear explosive systems went a progressive way of using radiation implosion and the creation of binary systems. It is based on the remarkable fact that during a conventional atomic explosion, 80% of energy, at the beginning of its development, is released in the form of soft X-rays, and not in the form of fission fragments. This happens due to the very high density of energy release in the explosion zone and, accordingly, the complete ionization of the substance in the explosion zone. Naturally, X-rays are far ahead of expanding ones (at a speed of about 1000 km / s)
        fission products and plutonium residues. This allows the use of x-ray radiation from a nuclear bomb to compress and set fire to a structurally located separately
        from it a thermonuclear fuel (LiD) tank, by compressing it with radiation, before an expanding primary nuclear explosion destroys this tank. A thermonuclear fuel tank is called the second stage and contains a nuclear charge initiated by radiation implosion of x-ray radiation. This charge serves to heat up and additionally compress thermonuclear fuel and initiate it
        thermonuclear reactions.
        Initially, this idea was embodied in the well-known Ulam-Teller scheme. I will not give a detailed description of this scheme, it is in many sources, including on the Internet.
        I will cite only the results: The two-stage Teller-Ulam scheme allows you to create such powerful charges as the trigger power is enough for ultra-fast compression of a large amount of fuel. To further increase the charge, you can use the energy of the second stage to compress the third.
        In general, at each stage in such devices, power amplification in 10 - 100 times is possible. This scheme is used, for example, in warheads of the MX missile with an energy of 450 kilotons of TE and amplification from gaskets of uranium - 238.

        http://profbeckman.narod.ru/Frend4c.pdf
    2. +4
      April 12 2015 18: 37
      "Soviet AB RDS-1, which was a copy of the American AB"

      It seems that without at least some elementary myths about the USSR created by Western propaganda, we can no longer write a single article.

      RDS-1 - AB according to the same scheme as the first American bomb, but nevertheless it is by no means a copy, but our Russian project led by L. Beria and our brilliant scientists Kurchatov, Sakharov, Lange and many others. If we were only capable of stupidly copying what was stolen in the west, as the liberals constantly go on talking about, then it is not clear from whom we copied the same RDS-6с hydrogen bomb from aliens? we ourselves can’t do anything .......
    3. +4
      April 12 2015 18: 42
      Nothing paradoxical. Anglo-Saxons ALWAYS use ANY means to get an overwhelming advantage over us. For what? Remember the 90s and you will understand, for UNPUNISHED robbery and KILLING. But they don’t succeed. They are cowards, by nature and mentality, and cowards are ALWAYS ruthless to everyone else. That's why they come up with new methods of killing. This is their essence, everything else is derived from their thirst for violence and robbery. They have been the sole owners of the nuclear bomb for 4 years, but cowardice and fear of our strength prevented them from using it. When the bomb appeared with us, then nuclear weapons became the guardian of the world. As you can see, colleague, no paradox.
  2. +5
    April 12 2015 08: 38
    I would like to draw the attention of colleagues to a thorough ORGANIZATION of the product creation process with the PERSONAL responsibility of all participants.
    This is so lacking now. It seems that the programs are accepted reasonable. And as for liability for failures, delays or cost overruns - so helpless hands.
    So serious things are not done.
  3. 0
    April 12 2015 10: 55
    I have nothing to add, but if anyone is interested in this topic, watch "Secret Mountain" in the center of Siberia on YouTube. You will not regret.
  4. 0
    April 12 2015 14: 06
    And what does an explosion with a force of 10 to 50 kilotons mean? Yes, we wanted ten, and she would shy away.
  5. +2
    April 12 2015 14: 52
    it would be nice to drop one on Fashington or L (G) ondon! am
  6. +1
    April 12 2015 18: 29
    I would like it even harder! So that there is no stone on the stone from these mattresses! I am 65, I am ready to sit in this bomb so that it gets where it is NECESSARY !!! soldier
  7. 0
    April 12 2015 21: 45
    Quote: AlNikolaich
    Sakharov, as I see it, was a very unhappy person ... An ingenious scientist who understood the value of peace and human life, not understood by the party elite, and taken under the guardianship of Western special services and "human rights defenders" who made him the banner of their struggle ... But he turned out to be higher , did not become a traitor, but remained until the end as it is! And unfortunately, incomprehensible until the end of his life!

    rather, he was born late. therefore, I did not feel the idea properly ...
  8. +1
    April 13 2015 00: 56
    From the article per kilometer it smells of apotheosis. All of the above scientists have really done an incredible amount, have worked hard to create our thermonuclear weapons. But, but there is a small but. In fact, at the beginning, both we and the Americans were not able to solve many problems. The construction, which the Americans call their first thermonuclear bomb, simply could not physically be delivered to the place of use due to the enormity of its size. It is precisely because of these problems that they even curtailed their research in this area. We had exactly the same problems. Hence the famous Sakharov project for the delivery of a thermonuclear charge to the place of use by the sea. Then there was an incredible discovery made by Lavrentiev, without which there would have been no thermonuclear bombs between us and the Americans. But not a word about this in the article. Those. the article is not how it actually was, but as presented by those who took advantage of this discovery. They are great, but great also have weaknesses. They worked so much, but here is some kind of upstart. But the most interesting thing is not even this, but how the Americans got their thermonuclear bomb. After all, they stopped work in this area. This is the biggest taboo for all articles on this topic. The secret, because the leak was specially made, i.e. purposefully just from among these our super scientists. So Lenin’s prizes are Lenin’s prizes, and life is life. But about this episode ordered to forget.
    1. 0
      April 13 2015 19: 57
      Lavrentiev’s puff idea is really brilliant, but it’s dead end
      further development of nuclear weapons went a different way