Loan interest as the basis of world economic and political governance: past and present. Problems of loan interest: historical decisions and the impossibility of their decision in the present and future. The impossibility of further bank lending based on loan interest.
The institute of crediting for a certain percentage, not dependent on the borrower's profit, could not appear before such institutions as state registration of private property, legal proceedings, insurance, notaries and some others, for example, the system of bailiffs and the system of execution of punishment (prisons, hard labor, public executions) without which crediting at the professional level would be very problematic.
So that the scale of property flowing into the hands of usurers does not take on catastrophic scales for the state and population, this not very noble and pious deed was allowed (before the Reformation) to engage a limited circle of “professional financiers” - Jews practicing Judaism and constituting a relative minority of the indigenous population. But such a restriction in the Middle Ages led to mass discontent of the subjects of the European monarchies, which often went out of control and ended with pogroms, which were called “Jewish” (in the Middle Ages, the entire Jewish community was fed by the Jewish community (Jewish quarter) therefore, all members of the Jewish community got it indiscriminately).
Although usurers in particular, and Jews in general, were a constant excuse for discontent of the population of European states (mainly due to the fact that Jews preferred to engage in “chosen” professions and had more income than ordinary urban and rural residents), European monarchs were forced to endure, because the Jews paid a lot of taxes, and with their loans they stimulated trade and crafts, also financed the expenses of European aristocratic houses.
1492 year is officially recognized as the year of the end of the Reconquista and the formation of Spain as a single state. Apparently, on the occasion of this public holiday, the married couple King Ferdinand the Second of Aragon and Queen Isabella of Castile signed the Alhambra Decree on the expulsion of Jews from Spain, Sardinia and Sicily.
“The prerequisite of exile were powerful anti-Semitic sentiments in Spain of the 15th century, which were based on social conflict between the predominantly peasant indigenous population and the small Jewish community, which was actively involved in trade and usury, and also penetrated into many areas of administrative management, including financial management. Usury was forbidden to Christians as a sin, but was widely used by Jews and by the end of the century led to severe social conflict ”(Wikipedia).
The myth that Jews rule the world is just a myth, or at best part of the truth. If Jews ruled the world from time immemorial, then history would not have known such concepts as “the outcome of the Jews”, “Jewish pogroms”, “Holocaust”, “anti-Semitism”, “Judaism”, “Jewish world conspiracy”, “Zionism”, “ beat the Jew - save Russia ”and“ if there is no water in the tap ... ”
No people of the world enjoy such “love” from the side of the indigenous population as Jews. And these are the rulers of the world who own all the riches and destinies of all the peoples of the world! There is clearly some kind of trick, which, however, lies on the surface.
Jews as a world lending institution and his face do not really have the supreme authority over world finances. Just as Western politicians are not the SUPREME political power in their countries. A president or, in other words, a chairman is a person who sits in front, that is, a public person. And the one who controls it is behind it, in the shadow, behind the scenes.
Someone is very convenient that all the bumps got to the Jews. If the Jews really belonged to all (or almost all of the world's finances), then the Jewish image would appear to us not as a comical person in a hat with a beard, facets and glasses. The role of the Jews, more precisely, its world-wide Zionist elite is to be a lightning rod, a global and universal scapegoat (with facets and a beard), which the Jews are quite able to cope with.
If the Jews really ruled the world, the state of Israel would be the oldest and most powerful state in the world with an uninterrupted history. World Jewry and the modern state of Israel is just a financial and military-political tool in the hands of the real masters of the Western world. It can be assumed that the old European aristocratic dynasties have not lost their power in the Western world. And the Jewish banking houses both served them centuries ago and continue to maintain their loyalty to this day.
Of course, among the Jews there are very rich and powerful people. Formally, they own almost half of all that is on the globe. But between the formal and the actual power is a very big difference. Try to make a request in Yandex “Abramovich Kosh ...”, and Yandex will have a hint: “Abramovich Putin's wallet”. What mission does Roman Arkadyevich perform in London and why he needs the English Premier League football club, three giant yachts and several billion dollars, we can only guess.
And if someone thinks that the figures of Rothschilds and Rockefellers are certainly the stars of the first magnitude in the global structure of the world, then it means that someone really needs someone to think so.
There can be no exceptions: the real founders and beneficiaries of the Western world order will not shine either on the political or financial scene. Because the things they do through their "top managers" in politics and economics do not give them the slightest chance to come to the surface from the shadows, at least in daylight.
The problem of loan interest as a global institution of management is that it is not tied to the results of the borrower's activity. The behavior of usurers in the economy is like cancer cells that kill a healthy body. In order to preserve financial management tools based on loan interest and not destroy their national economies, the owners of the Western world had no choice but to organize world wars in foreign territories as a means of writing off their accumulated debts. But the presence of nuclear weapons more than one country has torn this convenient historical way of solving the problems of loan interest.
The example of Russia and China, when the country is governed through the institution of a national leader, is a nightmarish reality for the modern West and its founders. After all, the essence of "democracy" is a departure from personal responsibility through fictitious elections and the nomination of whipping boys as heads of states and governments. With such a scheme, the state cannot accumulate more funds than private financial structures. The state should be subordinate to private capital. Otherwise, what happened in Russia will happen: the state starts to dictate its will more and more firmly to private capital. The institute of lending interest served precisely for dragging cash and financial flows from the state treasury and the pockets of citizens into private banks. And the maintenance of the activities of state institutions and pants among the population was carried out at the expense of loans and a permanent decrease in the loan rate to almost zero, the reserve for reducing which has already been exhausted.
Military debt relief on a global scale is no longer possible.
To abolish the lending rate is the strengthening of the state and the weakening of private financial institutions, which is like death for the West.
To move from a “democratic” management scheme to direct management with the institution of a national leader is no longer a gateway from the point of view of Western civilization.
But in Russia, deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation are already considering bills for the appearance of Muslim banks in the territory of the Russian Federation, which are based on no loan interest. At first, these will be Islamic foreign banks, primarily Arab states on the territory of the Russian Federation, in order to run them into the work of Islamic banking in Russia. And then it will be the law, which will ban the loan interest and its derivatives not only in our country, but also in all countries of the world (including the states of the West as the losing party).
Borrowers of Muslim loans give the bank as a reward for its financial services a portion of the profit on transactions or development projects for which the loan proceeds. And if there is no profit, only losses, then there is no obligatory liability to the bank with its property or the property of the heirs. Muslim banks are not driving their borrowers into debt bondage. In essence, Muslim bank lending is a venture investment with a high degree of risk: you need to work not only with the borrower's documents, but with the person himself, and carefully study his case.
The imminent financial collapse of the Western world (we already see its agony) will entail widespread abolition of loan interest. And this will be followed by the abolition of complex taxes, sharpened by the institutions of loan interest. Most likely, taxes from private business will constitute a smaller part of revenues to the state budget. Because it will be taxes on small and medium businesses. But big business will have only state registration and state financing. The situation when businessmen and citizens pay interest to banks on loans more than taxes to the state is absurd, and this state of affairs cannot last forever.
Loan interest has no prospects for overcoming the crisis. A fairer BRICS bank will tear off third world countries from their former metropolis once and for all. Europe and in the Middle Ages could not live without goods from Asia, and now oil and gas from the Middle East and Russia have been added to Asian goods. It’s time for Europe and America to understand that they have a COMPLETE dependence on the rest of the world, and their global financial institutions of management are only programs in computers and rooms with specially trained personnel. Creating an alternative to these technologies will not be difficult for countries such as Russia and China.
Not ten years will pass, as the loan interest will be finally buried, and the world will become fairer and less bloodthirsty.
History of loan interest: from dawn to dusk
- Aleksandr Tamansky