Libyan National Army home-made systems: AK-230 naval guns mounted on trucks

20


Libya under Muammar Gaddafi was considered one huge warehouse. weapons. In fact, the quantity of weapons in the warehouses significantly exceeded the needs of Libya. This allowed Gaddafi to use part of these weapons for supplying various factions around the world fighting with the West, or donating them to countries in the Middle East and Africa. The latter’s donation of weapons was basically a kind of gratitude in the hope that these countries would later support the idea of ​​the United States of Africa, at the helm of which “of course” Gaddafi would be.

Many armories in Libya have become for many of the forces currently fighting for control of Libya, a generous source of modern weapons. However, the lack of spare parts and technical staff meant that only part of this heavy weapon would go back into service. The arms embargo imposed on the internationally recognized Libyan government does not allow the acquisition of new weapons and spare parts for the Libyan armed forces. However, it is known that one of the many opposition factions "Dawn of Libya" received weapons from several countries in the region of the Middle East and North Africa.

This prompted the Libyan national army (LNA) to look for solutions that could allow the level of firepower for their units to reach the required level. And while during the years of the Libyan conflict, we witnessed the appearance of many completely unusual cars, the LNA in the city of Benghazi took this kind of competition to a whole new level, setting 30-mm ship cannons into trucks.


The first product of this limited series (above) is a two-barreled 6-mm AK-6 cannon mounted on the KAMAZ 30X230 chassis, originally mounted on Soviet speedboats, mine trawlers and frigates. Initially, the AK-230 cannon’s task was to fight off attacking missiles and airplanes with the aid of the “Rys” MR fire control system.

In order to provide access to guns and ammunition, the tower was removed. Two 30-mm guns HH-30 with belt feed, each ribbon is placed five hundred shells. But a huge disadvantage is that reloading two guns takes a lot of time, even with experienced calculation.


The Libyan National Army is currently fighting the “Dawn of Libya” in Benghazi, where the latter has entrenched in the hope of holding this city. Libyan Dawn controlled most of Benghazi, but could never capture the port, which serves as the base for the Libyan fleet.

The Benghazi naval base was home to the Koni class 212 Al Hani frigate, Nanuchka class 416 Tariq-Ibn Ziyad (or Gadfly) corvette, one of the few remaining Natya minesweepers and a Foxtrot submarine that was out of order. However, Al Hani left Benghazi a couple of years ago, and Tariq-Ibn Ziyad was shelled with artillery and subsequently sank.

Due to lack of maintenance, the only mine-sweeper of the Natya class sat on the bottom at the end of the last year, but both his AK-230 cannons, which were later installed on KamAZ and Scania trucks, were removed from it. The remains of the ill-fated mine-sweeper Natya class can be seen in the photo below.


Both trucks are in service with the 309 battalion of the Libyan National Army. The text, written on the armor sheet in front of a Scania truck armed with an AK-230 cannon, reads “Council of the General Staff - National Army K 309”.

Whether the design is more practical or not compared to the 23-mm ZU-23 or 30-mm M1980 installed on the machines, life will show, since both of these guns can have the same rate of fire and have the same effect on the target, but at the same time AK-230 is much more difficult to target.

Libyan National Army home-made systems: AK-230 naval guns mounted on trucks

If a ceasefire agreement or an arms embargo does not end, the Libyan national army could well surprise us with even more interesting “do-it-yourself” crafts.

Materials used:
www.spioenkop.blogspot.ru
www.ru.wikipedia.org
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    6 March 2015 07: 16
    Kulibins are their mother. They would have put ak630.
    1. avt
      +14
      6 March 2015 08: 52
      Quote: Alex_Rarog
      Kulibins are their mother. They would have put ak630.

      wassat Oh no need to show that! Suddenly, the Nikolaev plant, when the season for potbelly stoves passes, will do this, and even in towed, as with the remains of the BRDM earlier version! ?? laughing
  2. +7
    6 March 2015 07: 21
    Very specific cars. Paper in itself, but bite very painfully.
  3. +6
    6 March 2015 07: 39
    Quote: Alex_Rarog
    They would have put a630.

    Yes, also such an idea arose immediately laughing . But there the cargo chassis will not stand, it would be necessary to use MTLB or BMP, and even that ...
    1. +2
      6 March 2015 08: 38
      it is possible on a semi-trailer up to 60 tons. laughing
  4. ICT
    +2
    6 March 2015 07: 40
    Quote: Alex_Rarog
    Kulibins are their mother.


    I would like to see real shooting,
  5. +3
    6 March 2015 07: 41
    Goal for invention is cunning!
  6. +2
    6 March 2015 07: 44
    "Toyota War". Second version. But from the calculation of "scare" shooters. If there is a problem with targeting, then the result of the conversation should not be. especially since 230 that 630 they work better with radar than without them.
    but the very idea of ​​this direction of modernization is good! But, it’s better on a tracked chassis and yet with a radar.
  7. +1
    6 March 2015 08: 19
    They wanted to use it with a radar, but did not. Why?
    1. +1
      6 March 2015 08: 59
      There are no specialists, I see no more reasons ...
    2. 0
      6 March 2015 11: 05
      Probably the same reason why the ZSU is used in Syria without a radar. It is unnecessary. In the city, you don't need to shoot a radar, but in the "field" you need a different chassis. I doubt that they are capable of hitting the target at all - the structure is too unstable. If the Pantsir mazhe, then what to say about it. So, to cover attack aircraft with AK and RPG, no more.
  8. +2
    6 March 2015 08: 32
    Cheerful tachanka ... It seems to me that this is a machine for "designating your presence".
  9. +1
    6 March 2015 08: 38
    Quote: qwert
    They wanted to use it with a radar, but did not. Why?

    It is necessary to pair with a ground-based radar, and most likely there are no such specialists and the radar itself. This is not a gun to put on the chassis, where a competent welder, a locksmith and a couple of assistants are enough.
  10. +1
    6 March 2015 08: 42
    Yes, good. The main thing is that they do not give up and try to win.
    1. 0
      6 March 2015 08: 54
      The guys have no special choice.
  11. +1
    6 March 2015 09: 00
    They shoot according to the principle, about there ....
  12. 0
    6 March 2015 09: 12
    Quote: Belimbai
    They shoot according to the principle, about there ....

    Effectively use the manpower of the enemy, as a fire suppression. Shaitan machine in one word. The use of armored vehicles is problematic due to guidance problems. And at close range it’s like suicide.
    However, AK 230 and 630 installations also had manual fire control posts in their arsenal; if you install such a post on the same chassis, the mixture will be hellish.
    1. 0
      6 March 2015 09: 31
      Here is something similar.
  13. +3
    6 March 2015 14: 08
    This is called a "sighting column". Well, there must also be systems of drives that work out guidance on the sighting column. All sorts of servos and solenoids. It doesn't look like it will all fit.
  14. shura_kuznetsov
    0
    10 March 2015 17: 01
    Very interesting comments on an English article.

    Take a look: http://spioenkop.blogspot.kr/2015/02/the-libyan-national-army-going-diy-ak.html
    1. oleg1970
      0
      12 March 2015 17: 59
      Yes, indeed, our people are doing something. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/11/how-international-divisions-contrib
      uted-to-syrias-war-without-end # comment-48782304

      Congratulations, it’s a good idea to make oil more expensive and close the budget again.

      The most important thing is to get control for deliveries, but it is not necessary to lift the embargo, you can do it differently, we can control everything on our own. :)
    2. Dima-smirnof
      0
      13 March 2015 17: 55
      So many weapons should go through the EU. Since weapons cannot be transported through the Black Sea or ukrov, it must be passed through a small country in central and eastern Europe. About Slovakia seems like a very hospitable country where the government loves Russia. And before there were already deliveries through this country.
  15. 0
    11 March 2015 18: 39
    And what’s cool, like a speaker: if you want to live, you’ll not dodge so bully