The White House commented on the rumors about the supply of arms to Ukraine through the UAE

24
US sells weapon only those buyers who are its ultimate owner and undertake not to transfer the goods to another user in the future, said a White House spokesman, commenting on reports of a possible diversion of American weapons from the UAE to Ukraine. About this newspaper writes Look with reference to tass.

The White House commented on the rumors about the supply of arms to Ukraine through the UAE


The answer of the official of the presidential administration did not clarify the issue of “leaks”. Only one thing is clear from it: it is impossible to transfer weapons to third countries.

“Ukraine is a sovereign country that has the right to enter into agreements with other countries,” he said. “We recommend that you contact the relevant governments for any details of the new trade agreements.” And this comment was followed by the information that Poroshenko entered into some contracts at a military exhibition in Abu Dhabi (UAE).

“In accordance with our law on the control of the export of weapons and its regulations - regulations governing international transfers of weapons - all transactions for the sale of American weapons require the buyer to consent to the final use, i.e. making sure that the buyer is the final recipient of these materials and undertakes not to transfer them to the other party without the prior consent of the US government, ”explained the White House official.

After Petro Poroshenko’s trip to the United Arab Emirates in the American media, there were suggestions that Ukraine “would get American weapons, in many cases purchased by the Emirates”. In this regard, the opinion was expressed: "The United States is leading the matter to the escalation of the Ukrainian conflict and arming Kiev with weapons" washed "through Abu Dhabi."

In late February, the UAE MFA refuted the Kiev authorities' statement about the country's plans to export weapons to Ukraine.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    3 March 2015 17: 52
    Does a black monkey wash his face off white? Somehow funny. ..and can’t believe it. ..
    1. +19
      3 March 2015 17: 53
      In the courtyard under the cantilever, the owner laid out his weapon. Rubs, lubricates, admires ...
      Around revolves a young son.
      Eyes run up, drooling, hands itching ...
      Finally doesn’t stand it:
      - Old Man, but give me a shot from a machine gun!
      - Why? Build but ...
      Sonny presses on the trigger, at first simply dragging from the sound, then he finds himself on the spot fly, a fence, jugs on the fence ... finally, there are live targets - hens. Hens with hysterical clucking scatter, but there it was! Bullets still run faster. Seconds later, a cloud of powder smoke hangs over the courtyard, the courtyard is splattered with blood and strewn with feathers and feathers. The last fat old cock was shot down while trying to fly over the roof of the hut.
      - And sho, a tatka, a file? - the son asks proudly.
      - That fayno, Sinku.
      - Can you throw a grenade?
      - That go, Sink.
      Sonny chooses the largest and throws directly into a wooden toilet. After a couple of seconds, an explosion rattles, the toilet flies up about fifteen meters, somewhere there its half-life begins, and first boards, slivers, pieces of burning newspapers land in the yard, then women's slippers and smoldering scraps of women's clothing and linen. The smoke disappeared, and it smelled of something native and characteristic of the native land. Some strange plaque covered the ground, chicken carcasses, a hut, a stodola, a fence, jugs on the fence, unfolded weapons ...
      - And sho, a tatka, a file? - the son is not very confidently asking, spitting and shaking the poop off his head.
      - Well Faino, Sinku - also spitting and shaking off - otherwise we would see the kind of mother for the chicken ...
      1. +9
        3 March 2015 17: 57
        Selfie with Arabs is the height of Pig-Pedro's political career. One Arab is a security guard at the exhibition, the other is cleaning the floors.
        1. jjj
          +4
          3 March 2015 18: 51
          Quote: Rostov Dad
          One Arab at the exhibition is a security guard, the other removes the floors.

          The Americans themselves wrote that they were camel drivers
        2. +2
          3 March 2015 19: 44
          Poroshenko foolishly blabbed the military secret of the Americans.
      2. +25
        3 March 2015 18: 04
        The United Arab Emirates officially said that they won’t deliver weapons to Kiev, but didn’t specify it on the quiet. Double standards in a word
        1. +4
          3 March 2015 18: 30
          For a long time so sincerely did not laugh !!!
          1. +1
            3 March 2015 22: 22
            Quote: gunter_laux
            For a long time so sincerely did not laugh !!!


            Me too, but still I would like to read the name of this comedian from the "white house" (I wanted to print - "yellow house"). bully
    2. Denis fj
      +6
      3 March 2015 19: 24
      Whatever they say, but the weapon itself can neither go, nor crawl, nor fly to Ukraine. And do not fool us, that they do not know who supplies it! Well, if they demonstrate their abilities to reveal foreign ways of arms trade with such show trials as our Bout, then they are even more versed in their own business. The presence of these weapons in the Ukrainian security forces suggests that they are being supplied. And this fact is confirmed by its captured captures. And this is not some fictitious fact from the Bout case, but the real one - with its real presentation by the militias. Let them investigate their supply channels themselves.
    3. 0
      3 March 2015 21: 49
      No it's cool
      The United States sells weapons only to those buyers who are its ultimate owner and undertake not to transfer the goods to another user in the future, the White House spokesman said.

      Based on this, it turns out that ANY AMERICAN WEAPON DETECTED FROM WHO SHOULD NOT BE SOLD BY THE USA.

      That's for the same "blah blah" mono and to the court to drag laughing
    4. 0
      3 March 2015 23: 13
      The monkey blurted out something again and again not in the case.
  2. 0
    3 March 2015 17: 53
    first, Ukraine pushed them the inheritance from the USSR, and now they themselves will be buying them at exorbitant prices
  3. Aspirin
    +4
    3 March 2015 17: 53
    Come on soar. laughing They sell to final consumers.
    But what about the downed small British plane headed for the IGL? Is Iran a contra?
  4. +2
    3 March 2015 17: 56
    And where did the American ATGM ATGMs come from in Syria - if the United States monitors all buyers and does not allow the transfer of weapons to a third party.
    1. +1
      3 March 2015 21: 24
      Well, they are, well, like the proverb, I'm not me, and the horse is not mine.
  5. +10
    3 March 2015 17: 57
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/033/tlhi588.jpg


    New secret weapon transmitted by Obama through the UAE ... !!!
  6. +2
    3 March 2015 17: 59
    They gave the go-ahead - buy weapons anywhere, from anyone, but the main thing is that it would shoot without interruption.
  7. +12
    3 March 2015 18: 01
    DLNR are waiting for the supply of summer weapons!
  8. kelevra
    +4
    3 March 2015 18: 02
    It seems that recently, at an exhibition in India, the Arabs announced that the parasite was breached! They did not and would not conclude any agreements with him and would not deliver anything!
  9. +6
    3 March 2015 18: 06
    all transactions for the sale of American weapons require the buyer to consent to the assurance of final use, i.e. proof that the buyer is the final recipient of these materials and agrees not to transfer them to another party without prior consent of the US government


    Modest at first glance, but the key phrase - "without the prior consent of the US government." Given the well-known honesty and integrity of the states, they will never agree to such blasphemy. Cut it!
    1. +5
      3 March 2015 18: 50
      Quote: Stinger
      Modest at first glance, but the key phrase - "without the prior consent of the US government"

      And whom to believe? The most corrupt and hypocritical and deceitful pseudo-government of villains unleashing wars around the world ?! Anathema! And they must be destroyed!
  10. +2
    3 March 2015 18: 07
    The answer of the official of the presidential administration did not clarify the issue of “leaks”. Only one thing is clear from it: it is impossible to transfer weapons to third countries.

    the official spins around in a pan ...

    In short, after a while, all the facts will emerge and the American authorities will naively look at the world in Ukraine, which they so wanted to contribute by supplying their weapons ... This is the American axiom - the war ends if you fill up the country with weapons, but only American, for nothing else contributes to the establishment of peace, only the American laughing
  11. +2
    3 March 2015 18: 10
    "The United States sells weapons only to those buyers who are its ultimate owner and undertake not to transfer the goods to another user in the future, said a White House spokesman."
    Actually, this is a standard phrase from the "End User Certificate", but the fact that the US follows it ... not a fact.
  12. +2
    3 March 2015 18: 12
    Rumors are not rumors, but they will stuff Ukraine with weapons .. (naturally, not the Javelins), something simpler from the old warehouses of the former CMEA .. The slaughter of the Slavs must continue! Waltzman and Yaytsenyukh will try ... Nemtsov was overwhelmed I think for this (I’ve sacrificed my own on the board .. and even gave the order posthumously ..))) Well ..
  13. +4
    3 March 2015 18: 14
    Che-e-e-e-e-e feel love ... Directly touched Yes and wept crying .
  14. +4
    3 March 2015 18: 23
    and undertakes not to transfer them to the other party without the prior consent of the US government", - explained an employee of the White House. - For Ukraine, there will be agreement, no doubt ...
  15. +4
    3 March 2015 18: 29
    Here infa, well, almost to the topic .. I hope now all this will look mutually beneficial ..
    MOSCOW, Mar 3 - RIA News. The governments of the Russian Federation and Egypt will sign a protocol on military cooperation, Russian Defense Minister Army General Sergei Shoigu said on Tuesday, opening negotiations with his Egyptian counterpart, Defense Minister and Defense Industry of the Republic of Egypt, Colonel General Sedka Sobhi Said Ahmed.

    According to the Russian minister, "an important result of the joint work will be the signing of a protocol on military cooperation between the government of the Russian Federation and the government of the Arab Republic of Egypt. This document will determine the vector of our cooperation in the military sphere for many years to come."

    "I propose to start filling it with concrete content. We will focus on joint actions to combat terrorism. Of course, the focus will also be on the training of Egyptian military personnel in the universities of the Ministry of Defense and a number of other areas of mutual interest," Shoigu said.

    He said that "today we will analyze what we have managed to do over the past year to build up bilateral ties in the military field."

    In September last year, the head of the FSMTC, Alexander Fomin, said that the Russian Federation and Egypt had initialed arms contracts worth $ 3,5 billion. Earlier, the general director of the state corporation "Rostec" Sergei Chemezov told RIA Novosti that these contracts involve the supply of small arms, air defense and artillery.

    In turn, the general director of RSK MIG, Sergei Korotkov, told Russian media in September that Egypt was interested in purchasing a batch of MiG-35 fighters.

    For the first time, talks about Egypt’s purchase of various types of weapons from Russia were being discussed after the United States refused to provide military assistance to Cairo in connection with the military overthrow of Islamist President Mohammed Mursi in the summer of 2013.

    A serious contract, but this is not the most important thing I think!
  16. +2
    3 March 2015 18: 37
    What kind of Americans are honest and peaceful, for world peace, and "it is impossible to transfer weapons to third countries." And this weapon is so fluid, it flows through the borders of no one knows how.
  17. act
    act
    +2
    3 March 2015 18: 37
    Storytellers, states everywhere supply and sell weapons through private arms firms.
  18. Vezhchel
    +2
    3 March 2015 18: 39
    The monkey gave the grenade to the pig.
    1. +2
      3 March 2015 18: 58
      What will the pig throw to the guarantor? Fling a Piglet!
    2. Denis fj
      0
      3 March 2015 19: 22
      Quote: Vezhchel
      The monkey gave the grenade to the pig.



      Their own fat, in their own face!
  19. +5
    3 March 2015 18: 58
    Neither matasnik nor the Emirates, and even more so Poroshenko can not be trusted. And arms supplies to Ukraine will be without options. Nobody thinks about the world there. Their task is different - the destabilization of Russia. And the junta’s own equipment and weapons are ending faster than they thought.
  20. +1
    3 March 2015 19: 06
    Helicopters with UN recognition - have been noticed, now they will be with a small difference (in one letter) - US. Everything that comes from the State Department is a lie! Without Jennifer Psaki, lies are frank and shameless. With her, a fool, it was possible at least somehow to break off (fend off) in case of a complete jamb.
  21. 0
    3 March 2015 19: 28
    The response of the presidential administration official did not clarify the issue of “leaks”.

    It would be better if Pssaki commented on the situation. We are already used to it wassat
  22. +1
    3 March 2015 19: 29
    Who will believe you, after test tubes ...
  23. 0
    3 March 2015 19: 55
    "... undertakes not to transfer them to the other party without the prior consent of the US government ..." - then the dog rummaged! Agree, Cho is already there ... It is not for nothing that they muddied this whole bodyag.
  24. 0
    3 March 2015 19: 55
    Well, if the White House has commented, then supplies are certainly going. Do not doubt
  25. 0
    4 March 2015 02: 55
    "The United States is leading the case to the escalation of the Ukrainian conflict and is arming Kiev with weapons" laundered "through Abu Dhabi."


    Through whom the United States would not arm Ukraine, as a result, tension remains in this region, which is in the hands of the United States and their singers. But if several ships (planes) with weapons for Ukraine disappear without a trace - this will probably serve as a reason to reflect at leisure on the correctness of their actions.
  26. 0
    4 March 2015 04: 54
    The United States would be stopped only by one thing - the semetric response, the sale of air defense systems to Iran, for example. Supply of modern systems to Syria. Moreover, they would receive real money and show political will. But what is not, is not. The United States does what they want, puts it on everyone and everything, and in return - we think, we add impurities, we do, and truncates in the future tense. By the way, what sanctions did Russia impose against US? Titanium, go, resources go, American plants in Russia are working.