Russian Shield

Original title: Russian Shield
Author and Presenter: Arkady Mamontov
Director: Evgeny Zaichenko
Duration: 00: 43: 39
Manufacturing: Russia
Released: 2015



The film tells about how the United States of America has been actively developing the concept of "Lightning Global Impact" in recent years. Within one hour after receiving a presidential order, Americans can attack targets anywhere in the world.
In the last century, the famous Marshal G.K. Zhukov said: "The grief awaits the country that cannot repel the enemy's air strike."

Will Russia be able to repel possible threats? How weapons do we possess? And what can we oppose to the American concept of a global strike?

Comments

[The Art of War]

The film is excellent, and according to events since Iraq, Yugoslavia and Libya, this is very important.

[Geisenberg]

Quote: The Art of War

The film is excellent, and according to events since Iraq, Yugoslavia and Libya, this is very important.

The film was shot on time. I hope that with air defense everything is just that ... because if otherwise it will be a sad future for us.

[GUKTU]

10 years ago, the country's sky was covered by n 30%, and then mainly over the Moscow region. God bless if the situation has changed now. This information was discussed in the newspaper AiF. You can dig into the archives and see for yourself

[Zhekson]

Do not forget about the underwater wolves, oh boats, which like wolves circle around America.

[Hariton]

there was only a reb to the masses

[Army1]

In addition to defense, I would like to have the means of neutralizing the BSU, they probably are only under 7 seals.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

It is necessary to equip illegal immigrants in the United States with portable nuclear bombs, just in case, and let them live there with them, wait for the time

[atsoctopwaratsoc]

Guys tell me what is BSU?

[The Art of War]

Each of our Russian large cities must be protected by the S-400, and if we take the whole region, the triple ring of air defense is the S-400, S-350 Vityaz and Buk-M3

[Geisenberg]

Quote: The Art of War

Each of our Russian large cities must be protected by the S-400, and if we take the whole region, the triple ring of air defense is the S-400, S-350 Vityaz and Buk-M3

These are unrealistically large resources. The army will consist entirely of air defense if so done.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Sorry cities, millionaires have the right to good air defense / pro and cover aircraft, in addition, they have many defense plants.

[BOB48]

and kraukha for what?

[Lord of the Sith]

The S-300 is now 226 launchers with 4 missiles in each launcher.
S-400 9 regiments / 19 divisions 152 PU, also with four missiles on each. It is planned 28 regiments / 56 divisions of 8 PU in each division.

[Armored optimist]

As the former three-hundredth (not to be confused with the three-hundredth), I believe that every large complex should have, in close proximity to its position, 1-2 TOR, PRR a serious problem. Shooting from them with missiles of large complexes, or turning off radiation during their approach, means reducing the performance of the complex for other purposes.
And also in peacetime, ground protection and defense of the complex should be organized. Adding mouth guard.

[Geisenberg]

Quote: armored optimist

As the former three-hundredth (not to be confused with the three-hundredth), I believe that every large complex should have, in close proximity to its position, 1-2 TOR, PRR a serious problem. Shooting from them with missiles of large complexes, or turning off radiation during their approach, means reducing the performance of the complex for other purposes.
And also in peacetime, ground protection and defense of the complex should be organized. Adding mouth guard.

So now it’s kind of like that? The long-range complex is covered with small-medium complexes. I just have not seen yet the information on stationary complexes. Interestingly, but are there now such people or are they just placing mobiles on caponiers?

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Cities with millionaires should cover stationary complexes. For example, you can place 100 C400 missiles in fixed installations with one array in a military-industrial complex, and cover air defense can be left mobile.

[Ze Kot]

So you should know that turning off "high" does not knock the PRR off the target.

And the initial detection and guidance with RTV comes, not with its own locator.

And why in peacetime "attachment of the mouth of the guard"? They do well on their own.

[Ascetic]

This BSU strategy grew from the beginning of the 80s of the last century from concepts of general conventional warfare, then the concept appeared strategic non-nuclear weapons / SNNO / high-precision air and ground-based systems; reconnaissance-strike and fire systems of increased accuracy, range and striking ability.
The scheme was about the same as now. A disarming strike is being carried out on strategic nuclear forces and command posts, and everything that has taken off is intercepted by missile defense systems and an SDI system, now instead of an SDI, a global missile defense system is used.
At the same time, the 2nd and 4th TsNII MO was given a special R&D "“Studies to ensure the security and survivability of missile systems and strategic missile defense targets under the influence of non-nuclear weapons of a potential enemy”That is an assessment of the effectiveness of our air defense / missile defense in repelling a massive non-nuclear attack. The main headquarters of the Strategic Missile Forces determined the necessary "level of conservation" of the Strategic Missile Forces. He expressed himself in 95% retention of peacetime strategic missile forces.
Then, as a result of modeling, the criteria changed and stopped to ensure the direct defense of all positional areas of the Strategic Missile Forces missile divisions it was recommended to have 10-12 modern S-300 type air defense systems on the defense of each such area. However, subsequent reductions in the appropriations for arms supplies to the 13th and 14th five-year plans (by 30-40%), unilateral reductions in the Armed Forces, and also reductions in conventional weapons under the Paris Treaty did not allow the implementation of these proposals.
The organization of a cover by the air defense forces of the regiment against air strikes looked like this / with the example of the Khmelnytsky division / pictures are clickable

Currently, this is a mystery covered with a gloom of secrecy, Mamontov showed only the tip of the iceberg for work in this direction after the devastation and cuts of the 80-90s is still no end.

[Ascetic]

in Ukraine, to directly cover the position area of ​​the Khmelnytsky missile division (Fig.), air defense forces were allocated only as part of the S-200 anti-aircraft missile of three anti-aircraft missile units - 392 (Uman), 521 (Kamenetz-Podolsky) air defense and 96 air defense missile systems (Kiev ) (only six zrdn). However, in order for the enemy air attack from the west and north-west to break through to the launchers of this missile division, they had to overcome the front-line fire system of anti-aircraft missile forces 28 K air defense (Lvov) 8 OA air defense (Kiev). It was created by the forces of five anti-aircraft missile units (115 air defense units Brest (not shown in the figure, composition: 2 S-200, 2 S-75, 6 S-125), 270 air defense systems of Stry, 540 air defense systems of Lviv, 254 air defense systems of Mukachevo and 521 air defense systems Kamyanets-Podilsky) consisting of ten S-200 hulls, fourteen S-75 hulls and six S-125 hulls. And even if the enemy managed to overcome this firing line, then in the future, for almost a hundred kilometers, he would be attacked by fighter aircraft regiments 28 K air defense (there were more than 400 fighter aircraft in Ukraine). And only after that the antiaircraft forces of the direct cover of this missile division would enter the battle.

[bistrov.]

Quote: Ascetic

And only after that the antiaircraft forces of the direct cover of this missile division would enter the battle.

I would like to supplement your article. As part of the 19th missile division (Khmelnitsky) there was an air defense division armed with manual MANPADS. It was designed to destroy the enemy air assault in the immediate vicinity of the launchers, i.e. breaking through the far, middle and near air defense. In this regard, I consider it expedient to arm the existing guards at silo launchers with manual MANPADS, and the karpoms with stationary automatic air defense systems. Maybe this has already been done.

[Ascetic]

In my days, every rdn was armed with at least two MANPADS about the OS regiments, I don’t know where the emphasis is on the KAZ, at least for now. In our exercises, the tactical aviation counter-action was not in the order of things. The SU-shki periodically searched for air defense and worked out how they have called attack approach there.
Here is the MANPADS last hope.

[pahom54]

Quote: Ascetic

about OS shelves not in the know

There were no MANPADS in the shelves ...

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Good Russia needs 6 aircraft carrier strike groups. 3 at the base, 3 deployed at sea. Two for the Northern Fleet, two for the Pacific Fleet and two for the Mediterranean Sea. With air defense / missile escort ships.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

It is necessary to create river submarines with ballistic missiles, a submarine for hiking along the rivers and reservoirs of Russia, a diesel submarine with 2-3 ballistic intercontinental missiles, a mace.

[sharp-lad]

And deepen all the rivers thoroughly!

[Lt. Air Force stock]

The Volga, Yenisei, Lena, to launch these submarines into three rivers, why not deepen especially, the submarine can be made of a catamaran type, flat so that the draft is small, missiles can be placed in rotary mechanisms, as in Yars or bzhrd. That is, the rockets are in a horizontal position, when you need to launch them a hold opens, the rocket rises and starts.

[Ze Kot]

How will you pass the dam?

[Lt. Air Force stock]

On the Volga, for example, there are locks for passenger ships and for barges. I don’t know exactly how on the Yenisei or Lena, but there are certainly gateways there.

[voyaka uh]

Americans are trying to make hypersonic
cruise missile. This is the only novelty.
"global strike" The rocket flies in the atmosphere and therefore does not hit
under no contracts. She has no warheads - a blank,
kinetic kick.
While development does not work.

[Dazdranagon]

Quote: voyaka uh

A rocket flies in the atmosphere and therefore does not fall under any contracts

- there is no agreement until we have something similar! Perhaps work in this direction is underway! Americans, what to take from them ...

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Finally, Russia needs to create interceptor kenetic missiles. And then the Americans already have SM-3, SM-6, THAAD. And we do not.
SM-3 range of 500 km, altitude 250 km.
SM-6 range of 240 km, altitude 33 km.
THAAD range 200 km, altitude 200 km.
By the height of the interception, we are very far behind.

[Concealer]

A cruise missile is a very difficult target, and in the conditions of electronic warfare, it is generally difficult to find it. Maybe we will develop a lightweight carbon fiber and super-maneuverable "swift" for low flight altitudes at the level of cruise missiles. We equip it with a light rapid-fire cannon with an air blast of a projectile and an optical range aiming system for a confirmed and guaranteed destruction of cruise missiles. We will provide third-party target designation, group interaction and guidance to cruise missiles by air defense systems and satellites. And we will deploy several thousand cheap, lightweight and easy-to-use "swifts" along the border for guaranteed interception of cruise missiles. And in general, light attack aircraft armed with accurate rapid-fire cannons will always come in handy. And if I am able to work directly on the enemy's manpower and light armored vehicles, they will not be worth the price. ;)

[Lt. Air Force stock]

It is better to disguise the rocket as a bird and reduce the flight speed to 100 km / h. Paste the rocket with artificial feathers, etc., etc. And electromagnetic fields to shield. Then it will be very difficult to detect and hit it.

[Rurikovich]

For every tricky ... there is a priest with back streets! Therefore, the development of modern early detection radars, coupled with modern air defense systems, will give a potential enemy time to think once again whether it is worth starting a large-scale mess. And the "Dead Hand" is still alive, at least in the media. And the United States positions itself as almost the only owners of hypersonic missiles, which means that potential radioactive fields in the place of Chicago or New York make the possibility of such a strike ghostly ... If only the authorities are not ...
It's my opinion

[Lt. Air Force stock]

In general, if the Americans withdrew from the treaties on the pro, Russia needs to place anti-missiles on satellites in space, kinetic ones are possible. To in case of which the American nuclear missiles fly directly into our hands.

[sharp-lad]

To our hands? !!! Better let them pour on the sender!

[Umnichka]

To organize the necessary level of protection and replenishment of the RF Armed Forces by ships, planes, missiles, etc. of the required quality and in the required quantity, an appropriate industry is needed in a complex that we currently do not fully have and will not be without breaking the liberal capitalism, by the laws of which we now live. And never in Russia, the interests of the individual were higher than the interests of society, this is also from the same opera. Without breaking this, not returning to the historical path of development both organizationally and mentally, we are DOOMED to destruction, no tricks and mitigations in this assessment are inappropriate. It's time to make decisions.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

It is very difficult to create an impenetrable air defense. If desired, the enemy will concentrate attacks with anti-radar missiles over a width of 100 km along the front and will begin to deplete air defense in this area by quantity, then it will expand this gap until it is completely destroyed.

[sharp-lad]

I totally agree with you. And the enemy will never warn which 100 km. borders he set his sights on!

[sharp-lad]

I totally agree with you. And the enemy will never warn which 100 km. borders he set his sights on!

[Concealer]

Quote: Umnichka

And never in Russia, the interests of the individual were higher than the interests of society, this is also from the same opera.

Thought for reflection:
At the heart of Western liberalism lies a catalytic worldview according to which man is created in the image and likeness of God. And modern liberalism is based on the no less controversial postulate that a person is reasonable, reasonable by himself, apart from society. Here are the dances from these two "holy" dogmas. This is where all the current slogans of "tolerance" and "freedom of self-determination" come from, that now technical progress can make each individual taken a "god", that man is now "completely free" from everything, and absolute freedom is the "goal of historical development" :))))))))))))
It is immediately recalled: If there is no god, then everything is allowed. :))))))))))))
Something I do not believe in the society of "tolerant gods". :))))))))))

[Arktidianets]

Even two centuries later, the words of Emperor Alexander 3 did not lose relevance, but rather, they acquired a new meaning. I believe in the future of my homeland and will do everything in my power so that my beloved Russia flourishes and brings peace to this planet!

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Although our partners convince us that nobody needs Russia, on the territory of Russia 30% of the world's minerals, which over time are gaining more and more value, obviously sooner or later someone will look at them and we need to be prepared.

[fomkin]

An old song about the main thing. And not a single answer is who is to blame and why. The main idea is that we should be touched by Putin's continuous concern for our defense capabilities. As I understand it, the fate of Gaddafi did not like him.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

We are not to blame for the fact that Russia has 30% of all the mineral resources of the Earth. Which in one way or another our partners want to get. I like the Viasat Explorer or National Geographer on one channel, I saw a program like Americans launched their hands in Latin America and Africa, cutting down forests and depleting natural resources. The country is bankrupt, and American bankers tell them to wait, do not declare yourself bankrupt, we can help you, you have something to offer us, for example, rights to extract resources, timber, diamonds, etc. etc. And the country is in a bonded situation.

[bear]

We can do everything and overcome everything !!!!.

[bubalik]

Can Russia repel possible threats? What weapons do we possess? And what can we contrast with the American concept of global shock?

,,, Nobody dares to attack Russia: we have a system that guarantees a retaliatory nuclear strike under any circumstances. In America, it is called the "Dead Hand."


The benefits of fear


We habitually do not notice that the world on earth has been hanging on a thread for more than half a century. Our lives too. It started from the very time that nuclear weapons and intercontinental missiles were created. This thread is called "fear." Fear of receiving a crushing, deadly response. Any karate champion will tell you: no ears and mavash, jumping and screaming “Kia!” Will not save from a furious man with an ax. Especially if the man is in a quilted jacket on a naked body and worn out kirzach.


Today, such a thread - a deterrent to the third world war - is the presence in Russia of a system that allows a retaliatory nuclear strike even with the complete destruction of command posts and communication lines of strategic nuclear forces. In our country, this system bears the name "Perimeter", and in the USA it was called Dead hand - "Dead Hand".


The suitcase behind


A “perimeter” is not a “nuclear suitcase” worn by officers in naval uniforms behind our president. By the way, for the American - too. And they started to do it much earlier than we did. They started it under President Dwight Eisenhower, who knew his crazy generals well. But it ended after the Caribbean crisis, when the thread became thinner than a hair. Then President John F. Kennedy doubted that the nuclear arsenal was personally controlled by him, the supreme commander of the United States of America. The “suitcase” has a weak point: only the living can use it. And we also need communication lines.


Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev did not doubt his marshals and generals. But he could not watch indifferently how a probable adversary is constantly looking for ways to block controls and communications. What if the adversary hits the first and all command posts - to dust? And the colleagues are far from young ... If the duty member of the Politburo (and they had organized such a duty of "those responsible for the Homeland") said that before the fall of the first nuclear missiles the Americans had about seven minutes left, what could happen to him except a heart attack? But it was not good to lock everything on himself: he, the General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee and the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, in spite of the unlimited power, is also only a person in the end, although personal control must be maintained. It was decided to go in two ways.


People, ay!


At the end of the first path to 1984, a “nuclear case” appeared with a control and communication system. On the second path, difficulties immediately became apparent. After all, it was necessary to create a system that would guarantee to bring combat orders to command posts and launchers of strategic missiles without communication channels, making decisions automatically! How to trust a soulless iron decision on life and death on planet Earth?


But the designers found a solution. True, I had to create a system like artificial intelligence. Under normal circumstances, the “Perimeter” is napping, waiting for a command or alarm from the missile attack warning system (SPRN). Having received a command or signal to launch missiles from other countries, this system goes into combat mode. Automation starts monitoring a network of sensors to detect signs of nuclear explosions.

http://vpk.name/news/126932_Mertvaya_ruka_na_strazhe_perimetra_Rossii.html

[bubalik]

Thread thickness


Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense under President John F. Kennedy, deduced the criterion of guaranteed destruction of the United States — “unacceptable damage,” - estimated as the country's loss of half of its population and two-thirds of the economy. MakNamara believed that for this USSR it is enough to deliver megaton class nuclear warheads to the United States 100. In subsequent years, the criterion was repeatedly specified. Estimates of recent years made after the terrorist attack of 2001 of the year that destroyed the twin towers in New York - 150 - 200 UBP. But they still need to be delivered there. Is this possible in the context of the US deployment of a missile defense system? This is what the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Sergey Karakaev, said in an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda on December 16 of December of the year: “Two American missile defense systems are planned for one of our combat units. If in Poland 2011 anti-ballistic missiles are deployed, then their capabilities theoretically - in an ideal situation - to intercept up to 40 warheads. And then, if the Americans can upgrade them so that their flight speed will be comparable to the speed of our missiles. And with only one division we have, say, 20 blocks. ” So the "answer" is guaranteed.


An atomic explosion is accompanied by a shock wave, light, electromagnetic and ionizing radiation, which are detected by appropriate sensors from a decent distance. Having discovered, for example, multiple radiation sources simultaneously with seismic disturbances in the same coordinates, the Perimeter system comes to the conclusion of a massive nuclear strike. But she still does not know whether those who command are alive? Suddenly, the “End!” Command will follow? Therefore, the "Perimeter" first checks the connection with the General Staff. If there is a connection, it is disconnected. If the General Staff does not respond to persistent requests, the Perimeter asks for a system where the top is the “nuclear suitcase”. If they are silent there, artificial intelligence transfers the right to make decisions to any person in their team bunker. Is he silent too? Well, then, with no options ... Whoever didn’t hide is not my fault!

http://vpk.name/news/126932_Mertvaya_ruka_na_strazhe_perimetra_Rossii.html

[bubalik]

To everyone who hears me: take off!


From positions start command missiles. But they are flying not against the enemy, but over Russia. Instead of warheads, missiles carry radio transmitters. They send the “Start!” Command to all available combat missiles - in underground mines, under the wings of strategic bombers, in submarines and mobile soil complexes. The team bypasses all locks. No keys and red buttons rotated at the same time as in a movie. The system is fully automated, the human factor in its operation is excluded. Such an algorithm makes it possible to guarantee a retaliatory strike even with the complete destruction of command and launch calculations. Even its creators did not know how to disable the Perimeter. But how else to ensure a one-hundred-percent “otvetka” ?!


Doomsday Machine


None of the uninitiated would have known about the existence of the “Perimeter” if one of its developers had not dumped in the USA, where he exchanged information about the system with an American passport. In October 1993, the influential newspaper The New York Times erupted in a panicky article entitled "Russia Has a Doomsday Machine." US newspaper men called the system immoral. The "perimeter" carried combat duty until June 1995. And then, under the START-1 agreement, it was withdrawn from it. Our overseas friends applauded: they are champions of universal values ​​and morality, including ... But on December 16 of 2011 in an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda, the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Sergey Karakaev, said: “Yes, the Perimeter system exists today. She is on combat duty. And when the need arises for a retaliatory strike, when it is not possible to bring a signal to some part of the launchers, this command may come from these missiles from the Perimeter. Fearfully? But not only and not so much to us. So the whole thread ...


Parity?


Under the START-3 2010 Treaty, the United States and Russia are required to reduce the number of nuclear warheads (nuclear warheads) to 1500 - 1675, and their carriers (intercontinental ballistic missiles, ballistic missiles in submarines and heavy bombers) to 500 - 1100 units. In practice, at 2013 the year was this: The USA had 792 carriers of 1654 UPS, Russia had 492 carriers and 1480 UPSs. Russia and the United States have relative nuclear parity. Recently, however, a number of experts have said that the US missile defense (ABM) is capable of leveling Russia's nuclear missile potential. At the same time, other experts argue that the American missile defense system is not capable of seriously threatening Russia's strategic nuclear forces.



Mikhail Timoshenko
http://vpk.name/news/126932_Mertvaya_ruka_na_strazhe_perimetra_Rossii.html

[sharp-lad]

There is another guaranteed way to avenge your death, to locate most of the nuclear arsenal in the mines of the Urals, even the planet will not survive the consequences of simultaneously undermining several hundred megatons.

[sharp-lad]

There is another guaranteed way to avenge your death, to locate most of the nuclear arsenal in the mines of the Urals, even the planet will not survive the consequences of simultaneously undermining several hundred megatons.

[Yutas]

Suppose a massive BSU in our territory - if not 5 thousand, but 3 thousand cruise missiles. One S-300, -400 launcher can launch 4 missiles, two per target. Total - 1500 complexes are needed. There will be no time for reloading. And something, I doubt that we have so much. And also ballistic bullets ..... I'm proud, of course, for our army, but can we underestimate the enemy?

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Judging by Wikipedia, Russia has 2100 S-300 launchers of all modifications.
2100 * 4 = 8400 missiles in launchers, plus stocks of missiles in warehouses and in reloading machines.
Russia: 1900 launchers S-300PT / PS / PMU, 200 S-300V (presumably by 2012 all upgraded to B4) as of 2013.

[Ze Kot]

Lt. Air Force stock

The presence of launchers does not mean that they all stand on the database or can be put into combat position in a short time.

And do you know the reload time of one PU? In the SAM, the charging machine is usually one. The life of an air defense system in battle is until the ammunition is fired.

[Ze Kot]

Yutas
The first echelon is air defense aviation. The second air defense system.

And on the other hand ...

1. You are the supreme commander. Intelligence reports: an unprecedented training of strike forces to strike at the country. Your actions ?

2. You have already been informed that the simultaneous launch of 3-5 thousand missiles has been recorded. Your actions ?

[Lt. Air Force stock]

1) Withdraw all submarines that are at the base on alert duty to the seas and oceans, take the ships away from the pier, so as not to cover the entire squadron with rhinestones (no warship should remain in the ports (bring the combat readiness coefficient to 1 (100%) )), Raise all strategic bombers into the air, (if it is known that there is a clock left before the attack, if not, bring all bombers to full combat readiness on the ground, that is, the plane is loaded with weapons, it can fly out 10 minutes after the order is received). Expand all AWACS aircraft, deploy all ground-based radars throughout the country. To remove urban military garrisons from the city limits along with weapons (so as not to cover with a nuclear charge). To bring into full combat readiness all anti-aircraft regiments in Russia. To order the installation of tactical nuclear charges on the Iskanders, the same with the caliber, Granite, Volcano, etc. etc. Destroy enemy satellites with missiles. Activate coastal stationary sonar stations (probably Russia has its own SOSUS system, at least coastal (3000 from the coast) surely exists), and to be surely not mined.) Launch anti-submarine aircraft. Call the US President and warn that this may end badly.
2) Firstly, you can’t launch such an amount unnoticed, a probable enemy does not have such ballistic missiles, and you can’t launch subsonic cruise missiles either, you need to fly close enough. Intercept at long distances using fighters for target designation from land-based stationary radars (before launching missiles, intercept carrier B1, B2, F15, F16, F22 etc., etc.) if they are already disabled to use mobile radars. Interfere. Launch rockets in response.

[Dan Slav]

Right now, sing it! If tomorrow is camping, if tomorrow is war!
Again, continuous enemy environment and continuous enemies around!
But there is no longer a single power, there is no single leadership.
For whom and who will launch rockets? After all, their children and families are there, their real estate and conditions are there?
I wildly mumble that behind this decisive rhetoric is a decisive determination to resolve everyone!
Oh, there are big doubts. Rather, it is a desire to keep rivals away from their piece of cake. Even at the cost of losses in manpower and equipment. They will sit out, but ordinary people (see Donbass) will suffer or die at 100. And for what? Is there an answer to this question for a pensioner who raised this country from ruins or who honestly worked in production for the required years and gets honest 7-10-12 tyr?
And around they pull this country to pieces and ruin it: be patient, otherwise the Nazis will come and take everything away!
Besides rockets and armatures, maybe it’s necessary to root for your people? Pay him a salary and a human pension, and not a beggarly handout. Build housing, kindergartens, schools, clinics and hospitals. Something about this has not been heard lately. Then people will trust the authorities. And the films will be life-affirming, and not just postmen with leviathans or meta with traces.