London supported Paris and is ready to continue the "crusade" of the West against the Islamic world

11
London supported Paris and is ready to continue the "crusade" of the West against the Islamic world

In the West, they do not hide their desire to continue the "crusade", for the complete victory of "democracy" on the planet. In the evening, 3 September, after the “conference of friends of Libya” was held in Paris, according to its “arrangement”, English Prime Minister David Cameron stated that as soon as the “circumstances” allow, the UK is ready to carry out the “next military operation”. Just entered the taste! One gets the feeling that the Western world is so deeply degraded that it cannot offer other options for overcoming the crisis, except to return to times of open colonialism, when the strong eat the weak. Under the "circumstances" Cameron, apparently, means the completion of operations in Libya.

And this statement was made, after the sensational speech of the President of France, which 31 of August reported in the possibility of a preemptive strike on Iranian facilities.

In an interview with English television for the Today program, the head of the UK government emphasized that it was he who, on the basis of "moral obligations", insisted on the establishment of the so-called. “The no-fly zone for flights over Libya” and the provision of comprehensive assistance to the Libyan opposition in overthrowing the Gaddafi regime.

Western political observers are confident that the British prime minister is referring to the likely military strike against Syria, it is there that bloody clashes of the opposition and law enforcement forces are currently taking place. It is against the regime of Bashar Assad that the Western media, human rights organizations, and politicians direct most of their anger. So, events in Yemen and Sudan, where blood is also shed, for example, are almost not covered.

And David Cameron himself made certain reservations, stating that it is London that is “at the forefront of those who advocate a tougher approach” towards the Syrian Arab Republic (SAR).

True, the Briton lamented the fact that it was impossible to start a war to save the “Syrian democracy” without receiving broad support from the world community. According to David Cameron, "due to various circumstances, we cannot even adopt a more severe UN resolution." These circumstances are the position of China and the Russian Federation.

However, the North Atlantic Alliance attack on Yugoslavia in 1999 and the war against Iraq in 2003 clearly demonstrated to the entire planet that the West does not intend to reckon with international law when it comes to the strategic interests of the Western powers. This is confirmed by the war in Libya, when international law was not once violated. And any regime that does not suit the West, which cannot give a guaranteed rebuff, can at any moment be subjected to an armed attack. In this respect, the example of North Korea, which has a powerful army and nuclear weapon, can be tough to the West.

There is no powerful counterweight to the Western world that could restrain its aggressive impulses. The fall of the Soviet Union, completely untied the hands of the Western powers. Even mighty China, which is now on the rise, as long as it can control only nearby regions, it cannot single-handedly restore the balance of forces on the planet. According to experts of the PRC, at present the Chinese military potential is noticeably superior to all the Alliance states (excluding nuclear forces), except for the United States. They believe that now it is about one third of the US military potential. So at the present time, except Iran, right to intercede for SAR to no one.

The severity of the situation is confirmed by another source. Thus, according to Al-Quds Al-Arabi, an Arabic-language publication that is being published in London, during his recent visit to Damascus, Mikhail Bogdanov (Deputy Russian Foreign Minister) conveyed a message from Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to Syrian President Bashar Asad. The newspaper reports that Medvedev warned Assad against excessive actions against the Syrian opposition, as this could be not only a pretext for further tightening of economic sanctions, but also for the start of a "military operation against the Syrian army."

And there are plenty of reasons to launch military strikes on Syria. The country has been swaying for months.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Crazyzy
    +4
    7 September 2011 09: 25
    The vultures smelled of blood.
    1. LESHA pancake
      +3
      7 September 2011 10: 22
      THE NEXT SERIES OF DEMOCRATIZATION OF THE WHOLE WORLD BEGINS. THE SHOW CONTINUES
    2. His
      0
      7 September 2011 21: 48
      Again these colonial wars. The world is a spiral movement only at a new level, and the essence is the same.
  2. hellbringer
    +5
    7 September 2011 11: 13
    Medvedev warned Assad against excessive actions against the Syrian opposition, as this could not only be a reason for further tightening economic sanctions, but also for starting a “military operation against the Syrian army”.

    Ready to hand over Syria after Libya? It’s not clear that the West will eventually spit on the UN’s position in the long run and it will climb even without a UN resolution, but what the hell isn’t joking.
  3. +1
    7 September 2011 13: 33
    World War II began with small, and then millions of victims. Will the West itself be able to stop before such a temptation as a new redivision of the world for itself, because the inevitability of punishment does not exist for them. Only they punish them.
    1. Marat
      +2
      7 September 2011 21: 42
      No wonder they say that absolute power corrupts. Impunity now allows "world rulers" to create complete "lawlessness"

      At the same time, they are also trying to "read the moral" - through their completely controlled media. As Putin once said - "I am no longer surprised by their lies - I am amazed at the scale and insolence of this lie."

      And our liberals even on this site say something about freedom of speech and independent competing media in the west -
    2. Mesniy
      -3
      8 September 2011 22: 58
      "Small" do you call the occupation of Poland by Germany and the USSR, the occupation of the Baltic and Bessarabia by the USSR, the attack on Finland by the USSR?
  4. Patriot
    -1
    7 September 2011 13: 44
    And here we can understand. What is more important for Dima the interests of Russia, no matter how in Syria there is our military base, or to lick the west? And everything will become clear to everyone. But, I think we’ll surrender. For, our power is pro-American. wink
  5. -3
    7 September 2011 19: 45
    Patriot, just licks and even licks.
  6. +4
    7 September 2011 20: 41
    Outrageous !!! Muslims, what are not people? Though I am Russian, but it is wild for me to hear this "crusade against the Islamic world" ... When will these English turkeys be slapped !!! Russia in order to preserve friendship with the Islamic world, we need to prevent in every possible way or finally deliver missile defense and air defense to these countries! If this is not stopped, then these SEEEs will soon roll a barrel at us ...
    Just do not talk about the magistrates' court, The Hague, etc. no need to make fun of this nonsense ...
    1. His
      +1
      7 September 2011 21: 50
      The British are our natural opponents. Since the time of great empires. Once there were two world empires British and Russian.
    2. Mesniy
      -5
      8 September 2011 23: 03
      Yes, the Islamic world does not need friendship with Russia, and it has proved it a hundred times. If we imagine that there is no West, but only Russia and the Musliks, they would break it in a moment like a hot water bottle. they will not see it fiercely, like all the "infidels."
  7. dimarm74
    +1
    7 September 2011 21: 49
    Appetite comes with food .... What do not say .... but from the primitive laws of mankind is not far gone. That's right .... like Krylov’s:
    “Ah, what am I to blame?” - “Be quiet! tired i listen
    Leisure me sort your fault, puppy!
    It’s your fault that I want to eat. ”
    Said and dragged into the dark forest Lamb.
  8. Patriot
    -2
    8 September 2011 12: 23
    Max79

    If our people wanted to put the missile defense and air defense systems on the same Iran, we had already set them up long ago. And, this is so, simple political bidding. In addition, the contract for the supply of S-300 was signed long before the UN sanctions (which the Pindos and the British are lobbying for) and, in principle, nothing prevented us from doing this. Moreover, our military-industrial complex thinks that I would be very happy with this order.

    BUT, DIME AND BOBA in Pindostan were told to go awry. HERE AND THEY AND SIT. DO NOT CRUMP.
    Lord, when will You deliver Our Country from these two bastards and all their anti-people power ???
    1. Mesniy
      -2
      8 September 2011 23: 06
      you are some kind of strange patriot, but Iran is much more dangerous for Russia, and you have to be glad that at least someone bends the muslims.
  9. cVM
    cVM
    0
    8 September 2011 23: 41
    Iran is much more dangerous as Saudi Arabia, but everything needs to be done so that the forces in the Middle East do not decide, a coup took place in Egypt, but ours did not go there, and in vain it was necessary to immediately conclude contracts on the economy, military and political
  10. Patriot
    0
    9 September 2011 13: 52
    Mesniy
    Once again, please draw your attention to the fact that we have not yet switched to you. And, we’re unlikely to move on.

    I don’t know about the whole Islamic world, but personally it seems to me that Iran is much more accommodating and honest in its actions than Israel. And, besides, if Russia sold S-300 to Iran, the world would get a certain balance of power. Why is Israel equipped with this anti-aircraft defense system, and have Iran forbidden us to deploy our S-300s? And one more thing.
    For Russia, even from an economic point of view, friendship with Islamic oil-barrel countries is much more interesting than with Israel. The same Lukoil and Rosneft could be able to take root there and get a lot of contracts. As a result, we pissed away EGYPT, IRAQ, LIBYA, we will soon get rid of SYRIA.
    And, besides, in the event of a collapse of the dollar (which will inevitably happen), we could completely switch to our domestic currencies. And now, because of these S-300s, we are losing all chances to work with Iran. Yes, and Libya, represented by its PMS, has already announced that it completely refuses to purchase our weapons.
    MFA is your complete failure.
    1. Mesniy
      0
      10 September 2011 18: 12
      There are countries that live according to universal values, such as the majority, and Israel enters there. And there are still several regimes in the world that oppose themselves to these universal values ​​and try to spoil the world community in every possible way (terrorism, etc.), including Iran , a wild regime where people are executed in squares, their hands are chopped off, where they are sent to prison for water pistols, stoned for treason and other muck.
      Such regimes must be destroyed. And in any case, do not get under the feet of those who do it. And supplying them with weapons is like giving a shotgun to a neighbor addict, you see, the cops are offending him.