The tests of NATO equipment in Libya are going well.




Since the start of Operation Odyssey. Dawn "in Libya, many began to say not only that the Allies want to take over the" black gold "of the country, but also that NATO is not averse to testing its new weapons. A certain officer of the British Air Force, who did not want to give his name, gave a frank interview to a London newspaper. This interview contains remarks that indirectly confirm the facts of the use by Britain of the latest developments in the military sphere. Naturally, the very command of the operation categorically refutes the words that Libya has become a testing ground. The military and politicians are unanimous in saying that the purpose of the operation is the destruction of Colonel Gaddafi and the democratization of Libya.

Numerous military experts and journalists declare with all responsibility that in the course of several months against the troops loyal to the colonel were used weaponwhich is banned. One of such weapons is depleted uranium bombs, as well as thermobaric warheads. The first leave behind a huge destruction and cause more and contamination of the area. By the way, Ukrainian doctors working in Tripoli, recorded an increase in radiation levels with the help of dosimeters at a time when the city was "cold" after the bombing from British aircraft. In places where the bombs directly hit, the radiation level was exceeded tenfold. The use of thermobaric bombs led to the fact that there were extremely many civilian casualties in the cities of Libya.

The British command is trying to change the terminology used by the media, and instead of thermobaric bombs declares some bombs with enhanced impact. Of course, it is possible to call the gray wolf the Little Red Riding Hood, but from this it will not cease to remain a wolf. So in this situation: the NATO military are trying to replace the concepts and give the public false facts, but the case of the use of depleted uranium bombs can turn into a real scandal. Only someone will have to prove it. So far, in the evolving conditions, there is no need to talk about any independent expertise.

It’s not sad to admit, but in the case of the Libyan armed conflict, the NATO’s new weapon simply breaks the old Russian and Soviet weapons. No need to indulge in the hopes that the Libyan fighters, many of whom are celebrating 20 years this year, would be able to withstand the real NATO air armada. This suggests that if the principle of creating weapons in Russia remains the same as it is now, then in any confrontation with NATO, we will be forced to admit defeat, as Muammar Gaddafi actually did. So far we have to realize that most of what our defense industry produces was designed in the last millennium ... It is enough to recall that in any place where the same British air force fought air defense systems produced in Russia, it was the citizens who celebrated the victory Her Majesty. In Britain, there is even a playful name "Kremlin Regiment" - squadrons of aircraft specializing in the destruction of installations of the type C-200.

Another controversial point in the Libyan operation is the allegedly non-existent NATO ground operation. In other words, they are trying to convince us that it was the rebels who defeated them with their machine guns and grenade launchers. tank parts of Colonel Gaddafi with "little" air support. But in the words of the same British officer leaked to the press, there is information that the NATO uniforms walked on the earth, and not only flew in the sky. That is, NATO forces specifically sent their officers to help the Libyan PNS so that they would command their troops for better consolidation in the confrontation with Gaddafi’s troops.

If such information is confirmed, then the United States and other countries participating in the operation can safely submit to the International Court of Justice with a claim that they violated the UN Security Council resolution. But now it will be easier for anyone to do this - a big question. In the meantime, it remains to wait for the end of the next round of "NATO exercises" in Libya.
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. raf
    raf 2 September 2011 08: 16 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Yes, Her Majesty’s subjects have much to be proud of, especially the Kremlin Regiment. After all, it destroys the S-200 complexes! Only one thing, the author forgot to write that this complex is almost the same age as the mammoths! The last modification of the S-200 was put into service already in 1975! Yes, great valor, there is something to be proud of!
    1. jamert
      jamert 2 September 2011 10: 47 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Well, Tornado fighters are also far from youngsters. And Typhoon, although it has been produced since 2003, is actually only a project of the mid-80s. And by the way, he can work on ground targets very conditionally.
      Just the Libyans, like all Arabs - worthless warriors.
  2. aktanir 2 September 2011 08: 37 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Well, it would not be a sin for us to test our military developments. At one time, Vietnam helped in the fight against the United States. Could have provided secret support to Gaddafi, having looked in the case at the new that is available and is still not tested
    1. jamert
      jamert 2 September 2011 10: 49 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      And how would Russia transport, for example, the S-300 to Libya? By the sea? there are NATO ships. Sushi? are there rebels?
  3. Banshee 2 September 2011 08: 50 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Definitely worth it. Especially if this is a new technique. Both the results would be, and the military-industrial complex supported.
  4. Gur
    Gur 2 September 2011 08: 56 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    And I have long been offering .. as an aid, throw off the container with all kinds of PTs, arrows, flies in general with funny toys .. from Afghanistan to Libya .. those who are opposed to the West and Pendos. Russia tacitly contributes to the expansion of the hotbeds of conflict, if before the USSR acted as a counterweight to all the machinations of the West .. it doesn’t matter if our ally wasn’t ... it means that they will be ... and they acted as a deterrent .. they drove the fleet to help military experts and weapons. and the conflicts were transient and not so widespread .. since pendosy and zapadnuki started to get Lyuli and die .. and this is not included in their plans. And the world was more stable, because before they started something they all looked at each other's reaction. Now, Russia is a milking cow, only mooing and giving out millions of cubic meters of gas and oil, and looks with stupid eyes at everything peacefully chewing green jackets. I don’t know .. whether it comes to a meat-packing shop ... I don’t know, and I wouldn’t like to .. since I personally do not smile at war with amers and Westerners under corrupt government.
    1. strelok-07
      strelok-07 4 September 2011 13: 40 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I agree, but it is not worth scattering containers, they may fall on the territory of the opposing side. It is necessary to prepare for such events in advance, and precisely with the owners themselves and with their wishes.
  5. Varnaga 2 September 2011 09: 20 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Meanwhile, the latest British Eurofighter-Typhoon fighters are experiencing an acute shortage of spare parts.
    Due to the lack of components, the military is forced to dismantle individual fighters for parts in order to provide flight options to other Typhoons. Due to the shortage of spare parts and the reduction in training flights, only 8 of the 48 pilots of these fighters received qualification clearance to participate in ground support operations at the Typhoons.
    1. jamert
      jamert 2 September 2011 18: 42 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Because weak Europeans forgot the basic rule - the larger the series, the cheaper one instance. At first, the British ordered 232 Typhoons, then, in order to save money and in anticipation of the F-35 (which will not be available before 2017) they reduced the order to 160 (to be more precise, they did not sign an option to supply an additional 72) and as a result received a high price for each aircraft . That is, they will receive a batch of 160 fighters for about the same price as a batch of 232.
      Well, not ?
  6. Styx
    Styx 2 September 2011 09: 25 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    GUR support
  7. Siberian
    Siberian 2 September 2011 09: 29 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Quote: "... then the United States and other countries participating in the operation can be safely filed with the International Court of Justice with a claim that they violated the UN Security Council resolution."
    Interesting - who will sue them? Is it not Medvedev, along with Putin?
    1. dmb
      dmb 2 September 2011 11: 24 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Absolutely right. It is also worth recalling that the NATO “dabbled” missiles with depleted uranium back in Serbia, but still no one has fled to the court.
  8. Jarserge 2 September 2011 09: 33 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    According to some reports, in Libya, in addition to the 2000 European Special Forces (not counting the support of the Air Force and Navy), several thousand mercenaries mainly from northern Afghanistan (Uzbeks, Tajiks) fought precisely these fighters and arranged massacres ... I’m glad that the British Air Force, in 2011, have The Kremlin Regiment flying on modern airplanes and armed with modern weapons to destroy the 200 S-1964 complex (armed with the SA since 1967) Fearing a dead lion is nice ... It's a shame that the current ruling regime of the Russian Federation has turned into ordinary six westerns robbers.
    "The USSR has left us a great legacy, and we, its heirs, have blown it all ..."
    1. Dovmont
      Dovmont 2 September 2011 19: 10 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Add nothing!
    2. ballian
      ballian 4 September 2011 19: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Jarserge
      According to some sources

      ----------------------
      easier to say - according to the bank breaches - caddafidrocherov.
  9. lokdok
    lokdok 2 September 2011 09: 45 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It is not sad to admit, but in the event of the Libyan armed conflict, NATO’s new weapons simply completely destroy the old Russian and Soviet weapons.
    And what’s sad about this, the new Russian also beautifully breaks the old western. If the old Russian beautifully smashed the modern Western, then why would anyone buy a new one.

    A redneck Gaddafi, could have ordered 10 years ago and air defense systems and aircraft, but he wanted to be too tricky. There are 2 options - either you buy weapons for a lot of money, or you lie down under the strong one (and then you buy his cars, planes, etc. - whatever they say). So right - a lesson to others. If you want peace for your country, pay either to us, or to the United States, or to Britons, French. I hope all learned a lesson.
    1. Dovmont
      Dovmont 2 September 2011 19: 15 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The phrase in the style of Chernomyrdin !! But the most interesting thing is that the old Soviet and Russian weapons, in able hands, are pretty good at breaking up the new NATO weapons!
  10. wolverine7778
    wolverine7778 2 September 2011 10: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And they said that Tommy was bent))))))))))))))
    1. jamert
      jamert 2 September 2011 10: 50 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Tommy went to work at PMCs
  11. sancho 2 September 2011 10: 51 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Fully join the GUR, reflected all my thoughts. I’ll only add that Gaddafi himself is a mud ... to! He licked F ... pindos for a long time. We didn’t try to buy and update weapons. On this and got. Pindos sensed that Gaddafi ceased to be loyal to them and paid for it. Syria is next in turn. There, the guys practically follow the same scenario. Last year, they refused a contract for the purchase of a series of MIGs, right now the UN military will cut them off, like Gaddafi, and that’s all ...
  12. Ivanych
    Ivanych 2 September 2011 11: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I agree about the pastings of our air defense systems and other weapons .. like in Vietnam .. I wonder how the situation would develop? Could be supplied through Algeria, the next democratization .. By the way, Algeria helped the regime of Gaddafi ..
  13. Ion coaelung
    Ion coaelung 2 September 2011 11: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But the main weapon of the "demon-fold" is the media !!! And they succeeded in this. Which country can not only boast of such, but at least somehow resist the onslaught of false and convenient information for demonocracy ??? Here several "enlightened" ones gathered to one degree or another, and if you take a lot of people from anywhere in the world, the majority will say ??? Democracy is the guarantor of peace and balance of power! Shoot do not shoot your missiles, etc., the US standard, an example of how to live and what it seeks. Probably it is necessary to think about how to deliberate the “enemy" and not destroy it: the wolves will be fed and the sheep will be safe!
  14. Slipfar
    Slipfar 2 September 2011 13: 43 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Here, many write that they should help Gaddafi with weapons. It should be pointed out that in this case it’s a war against NATO from the side of Russia. YOU ARE? Comrade Putin, we are engaged in almost economic crimes against his country, and Comrade Medvedev cannot force subordinates to simply carry out their decrees. What kind of confrontation are we talking about ??? We are weak as never before! Can you imagine a political reaction from Europe and NATO countries?
    1. ballian
      ballian 4 September 2011 19: 42 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Slipfar
      should help Gaddafi with weapons

      Gaddaf does not have money? Again, he needs to "help"? Let MONEY pay - enough for our freebie to live.
  15. Alex_dnepr 2 September 2011 15: 49 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    By the way, a good way to get rid of radioactive waste by dumping it on the heads of "democratized" countries, huh? ;)
  16. figwam 2 September 2011 17: 55 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Depleted uranium ammunition has been used for a long time, we also have such ammunition in service since the Soviet times, they are not used in exercises because of danger. What kind of help do Gaddafi write here? Only the USSR could really intervene in real world politics (like war ). Our possibilities are zero, we can only vote at the UN and that is not adequate.
    1. LESHA pancake
      LESHA pancake 4 September 2011 19: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      WELL ON THE HORRY OF THE UN NECESSARY THEN. EVERYTHING IS EQUAL ALL IMPORTANT DECISIONS IN THE WORLD ARE TAKEN IN WASHINGTON AND BRUSSELS AND THE OTHER COUNTRIES ONLY SIGN UNDER THEM ..
  17. Insurgent
    Insurgent 2 September 2011 18: 10 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    whether these complexes were still in working condition, did the staff know how to use these complexes, give the Arabs and with-400 the result will be the same
  18. spirit 2 September 2011 18: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    the current government can directly intervene in the conflict if only it is on our borders (as in Ossetia), as well as Mr. Lavrov and the medical put will just pi **** with an intelligent face and rub on human rights, even if half the world is on fire ((
  19. Max79 2 September 2011 20: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What world court? Author yes you what?It should be God's judgment, not a world one. !!!Who sits in this magistrate’s court? American henchmen, Western licking ... Let the British now try to break through our air defense. From their “Kremlin Regiment” there’s not even a chip left ...
  20. serezhafedotow
    serezhafedotow 3 September 2011 00: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Are you inadequate too?
  21. strelok-07
    strelok-07 4 September 2011 13: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The controversy went wide, the main idea can be lost. And it consists in the fact that guests of any category should be prepared for a meeting in advance. And Milosevic and Sadam and Gaddafi and Assad, thought that playing in two camps would save them from violent guests, it didn’t work out. Most surprisingly, this situation does not make others think and take adequate measures. Only Ahmadinejad (Iran) falls out of this whole group, takes care of his arsenals, but here is another trick, our kremlins, under any pretexts, delay the supply of S-300.
    1. LESHA pancake
      LESHA pancake 4 September 2011 19: 45 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      OUR OWN TABOOTER EXACTLY SURPRISE TO PREPARE.
  22. matolyan
    matolyan 4 September 2011 20: 28 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    At the moment we do not have the Armed Forces, if there are no Forces, then we stand aside and suck what they will suck .... we are waiting ..... we hope for China .......... Hello everyone! !!!!!!!!!!!and