What is memorable anniversary MAKS

23


So ended so much awaited by many experts and amateurs MAKS-2011 - the same anniversary aerospace show. As the organizers claim this forum attracted a lot more visitors this time than in previous years, and allowed to conclude contracts for a record 10 billions of dollars. However, despite such, at first glance, the rosy results of MAKS-2011, there are people whom this event has brought, to say the least, to joyless thoughts.

So, let's try to sort out in succession the successes and failures of the jubilee tenth MAX. Before the opening of the air show in the press, rumors persisted that the air show was not at all simple. Here, they say, the organizers will show the world real masterpieces of the world aviation and astronautics. But all these wishes and hopes, in principle, were not destined to come true. Yes, we will not deny that the new A380 flew to the air show, which struck everyone present with its size. In addition, the US military “drove” a new transporter into Zhukovsky, which literally crushed the runway under itself. And what about ours?

And our somehow all at once went wrong. It started with the fact that the launch of the most powerful communications satellite in Europe, scheduled for the time of MAKS-2011 operation, turned into a real nightmare for developers. For several days, the Russian tracking systems could not detect where the satellite, insured for as much as 7 billion Russian rubles, had disappeared. In the end, the satellite was not found there and not those. It was recorded by American experts in the place of space, where, as they say, “not reach out” to the satellite. Representatives of Roscosmos called this place an unplanned orbit. Speaking in Russian, the super-expensive satellite simply flies around the Earth with a useless piece of iron.



Further, MAKS-2011 failed to conclude long-awaited contracts between the Ministry of Defense and representatives of the Mikoyan Design Bureau. It was planned that a whole squadron of aircraft would be procured for the aircraft-carrying cruiser, but the deal did not go. Once again, the departments could not agree with each other, and when the next negotiations take place, it is also not quite clear. By the way, India has long and very actively been purchasing these planes, and in our country they have been trying to sign a contract for more than a year. The usual problem that hinders the resolution of this situation is once again money, or rather, the notorious greed of military officials. Now, if the money could be “scrolled” and built with a dozen out-of-town cottages for themselves and their families, then our generals would immediately sign everything, and then, you know, all of a sudden, they would wisely manage the military budget. No wonder ... On MAX, everything is like under a glass cap. Therefore, it is not surprising if the contract will be signed in the near future and without so many witnesses. We have not yet invented a vaccination against corruption, so the officials allow themselves “a little extra” ...

One of the most notorious failures of the anniversary MAKS-2011 was a failed attempt to lift into the air in front of everyone that T-50, which waited like a breath of fresh air. What did they not write about this plane alone: ​​and that this is a vivid answer of NATO to all their developments, and that this is the salvation of domestic aviation, and even that this plane is the best in the world. We will not dispute the possible merits of the T-50, but, as they say, it is not necessary, and the "gop" was screaming until the moment of successful take-off and no less successful landing. Oh, our compatriots love to extol their work until the moment when it is successfully completed.

At first, the aircraft of the new generation successfully showed its flight characteristics to specialists, but on the day when tens of thousands of people came to see it, for some reason he did not want to fly. It may be right, and then, you see, they jinx it ... The test pilot, who was fortunate enough to operate this machine, felt during the take-off that the engines were behaving strangely and decided not to risk, stopping the take-off. The people who were preparing to watch the beautiful flight suddenly saw that two fiery tongues were pulled out of the right engine of the T-50 one by one. Although later the media claimed that Sergei Bogdan, the pilot of the demonstration T-50, made an emergency landing on his plane, in fact, the plane did not even have time to break away from the runway. After the release of the brake parachutes, he calmly rolled to the stop. This is where the plane and the pilot were lucky, because if the runway were shorter, the tragedy would have been unavoidable. And the rest, as they say, everything is fine, everything is fine ...

One can imagine what the aircraft designers felt at that moment, because it indirectly strikes at their prestige, and at the prestige of the entire Russian defense industry. Previously, we were not respected, but thanks to this very "defense industry" at least they were afraid, then they stopped being afraid, but they began to respect at least a little, but now they can begin to not be afraid and not respect. As you do not really want to be a garden scarecrow, which the crows fly around only "just in case" before you start pecking tomatoes in the garden.

In general, MAKS-2011 really gave a lot of surprises. However, many experts are not inclined to dramatize. They argue that even a T-50 take-off failure will not be fatal. The plane needs, they say, to give the opportunity to receive from the designers still a lot of elements of a complete set, which will allow it to show their capabilities to the full. After these words, there remains a kind of ambiguous feeling: on the one hand, the belief in the development of aviation in the country is unshakable, and on the other, some little worm prevents us from calmly continuing to think about it. By the way, foreign analysts also cannot decide whether this is another Russian advertising stunt or a T-50 plane, in fact, has not flown.



One of the few advantages of the 10-th MAX is only that the sales of the “Sukhoi-Superjet” seem to be adjusted. These passenger airplanes have contracts for 1,5 billion dollars. Successfully negotiated and concluded contracts for the implementation of MC-21. The total amount received by KLA when selling MS-21 will be 6 billions of dollars. In general, the light at the end of the tunnel disdains. Let's hope that the difficulties were temporary ...




23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Garfield
    -1
    24 August 2011 11: 22
    For the Su-35 and T-50, it is quite possible to purchase this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3TlOEeb6Bw&feature=related
    1. svvaulsh
      -1
      24 August 2011 13: 57
      And why is the R-27 a Ukrainian rocket? I was still studying the missile in the department of aircraft armament in 87. It is specially designed for the Su-27P developed, and everything else is modernization.
      1. Garfield
        -1
        24 August 2011 22: 22
        "Why is the R-27 a Ukrainian missile? I studied this missile at the Department of Aircraft Armament back in 87. It was specially developed for the Su-27P, and everything else was modernized." wink

        Well, there are complaints against Ukraine, strike with him !, But, freeze the misinformation - wipe the troll !! Did you even look at the performance characteristics? Damn the pilot!
  2. go_by
    -6
    24 August 2011 12: 40
    The roof of the hangar will fall on one prototype T-50. The second will be turned into an attraction. Engine production will be sold to China or the Indians. All this will be covered with a thick layer of PR.
  3. -1
    24 August 2011 13: 06
    Mikhail Zadornov was at this event. His blog on soap is a good description. Who cares, go read. http://blogs.mail.ru/mail/mnzadornov/5FEF6F170053311D.html
    Here is an excerpt "For example, the advertised Superjet. In order to get more kickbacks, the development of its various parts was placed in different countries! As a result, the budget was cut, but the plane was not really assembled. The" puzzle "did not fit together. Yes, it flies , both in terms of characteristics and on paper it is very good, but one day it flies, and then seven he needs to do tuning: tidy it up, "treat", so that next time in flight it does not fall apart.
    ...... But aviation passed into the hands of the capitalists. ... "
  4. mitrich
    -2
    24 August 2011 13: 19
    SOLODOVA,
    it’s time for smart 30-year-old women to read something more serious than similar nonsense in the presentation of the famous comedian.
    It is clear that such an opinion reinforces and strengthens your political views, however, believe in the word you cited below "excerpt" - nonsense from beginning to end ... The last sentence is half true.
    1. -1
      24 August 2011 13: 42
      Well, I won't argue about the characteristics of this aircraft - I am not savvy in this matter, but read the description (not a humorist, but an eyewitness) of the exhibition. Have high-ranking officials come to your city? We agree that by their arrival "order" is being established on the streets, where they seem to be able to drive through, there is a pillar of dust, the roads are blocked, random cars are driven into the yards. The inconveniences that people feel are not taken into account at all, and the event is reduced to a farce?
      And "Superjet", how many of them will we release if they don't sell us at least one of the spare parts?
      1. slan
        -2
        24 August 2011 19: 05
        And if Intel does not sell processors to you, but this one will burn? Not excited about your internet connection?
  5. 0
    24 August 2011 13: 30
    Yes, the Superjet is full of western parts and assemblies, we are told that it’s normal, the whole world builds airplanes like that. And the new TU-334 is completely ours, give it a way, let it develop, it’s an investment in our country, not the west. But our authorities do not want to see him point blank. That's how they love us.
  6. mitrich
    -3
    24 August 2011 13: 57
    SOLODOVA,
    A closed assembly cycle exists in only one country in the world - the DPRK, only this country lives on the principle of self-reliance. And then I’m not sure in all sectors of the economy.
    Do not want to go there? People close to you in spirit and almost communists live and rule there.
    At MAKS, specific machines that flew, by the way, were presented. Of course, if you wish, you can solve everything, but I do not share your pessimism.
    1. 0
      24 August 2011 14: 16
      There is such an expression - hope for the best, prepare for the worst, so this is not pessimism, but doubt. Mitrich, why don’t we think about recognizing that we also have no one to rely on ... This point of view, I think, is shared not only by the Communists. McCain very clearly alludes to a repeat of the Libyan scenario in other countries, including Russia, especially if Putin comes to power. (Although, I think this is a PR premiere).
      In which case we don’t get spare parts for the new aircraft, but what will happen to the old aircraft?
      This is, of course, from the realm of horror, but who knows what is being prepared for Russia?
      Here's the info that seemed to give me hope: "The main direction in the activities of UAC-TS for the coming years and the future is the formation on the territory of Russia of a full cycle of creation of transport aircraft of all classes, ensuring the supply and after-sales service of aviation equipment." If I am not mistaken, the UAC managed to sell a total of about a hundred MS-21, Sukhoi Superjet 100 and Sukhoi Business Jet aircraft.
      So, in the future, all the same, we will assemble the planes ourselves?
    2. -1
      24 August 2011 15: 48
      mitrich, I agree with you, break through. it is not for nothing that the ancients said, per aspera ad astra !!!
    3. -1
      24 August 2011 22: 49
      mitrich, clean your mailbox please.
      1. mitrich
        -1
        24 August 2011 22: 59
        Done.
  7. -1
    24 August 2011 15: 30
    Here is an interesting article from our aviation achievements.
    http://fishki.net/comment.php?id=94402
    ... here are the facts .. and the rest is fantasy
    1. 0
      24 August 2011 16: 01
      Yes, you can shove an iPhone into such slots, let's hope that this will not happen in the future, otherwise it will be shameful in front of people.
  8. 916-th
    0
    24 August 2011 16: 09
    Mitrich + Solodova = compromise :)
    But such a compromise. The closed cycle, which, in fact, our charming fighting friend speaks about, at the global level for Russia is not yet achievable - they are too far behind in several decades of "democratic" development. Thank God, not in everything, the good groundwork and excellent design schools affect.

    Follow the path of China and stupidly copy everything, from the glider to the last technological door - do not respect yourself. And it is necessary to produce equipment, moreover competitive, right now. Hence the compromise solution. We do everything that we can do ourselves. Everything, that while We do not reach modern requirements (avionics, electronics, engines) - we order to global manufacturers. But this is for the time being - until we pull ourselves up.

    Just don't put all the flying eggs in one basket, I mean Sukhoi (both fighter aircraft, strike complexes, and civil aviation), there are also MiG, Tu, Il, which wither without support and are bent. The site recently announced that 35 MiG-60Ds are the last MiG aircraft to be purchased by the Ministry of Defense. Then the whole stake is only on PAK FA (!!! ???).
    1. ESCANDER
      -1
      24 August 2011 18: 55
      By the way, the closed cycle at the world level in our time is a weak link. There is a high likelihood of "go nuts - happy new year." Regarding the global financial soap bubble from Pindos, it will most likely be so. We will see ...
    2. slan
      0
      24 August 2011 19: 09
      Here we are not even talking about "holding out". Subsistence farming in normal societies ended in the Middle Ages. You can certainly follow the example of Yu.Korei, but she is provided with material assistance. And who will do it to us?
      1. -2
        25 August 2011 09: 25
        Incorrect comparison - subsistence farming and a closed aircraft assembly cycle.
      2. -2
        25 August 2011 11: 36
        I put a plus for the expression "who will do it for us."
        A system in which production takes place in different territories is usually driven by cheap labor. It is unlikely that spare parts for the "superjet" are stamped in China, in Europe, right? Our labor force is certainly not more expensive than the European one. Further, the equipment that we do not have (yet) is a weak point that needs to be held out. Technologies - they say, now there is no, but who will give them to us? The latest technology won't sell. The outdated ones will cost us too much and will quickly become uncompetitive. It is necessary to invest in the development of your own. Our people were the first to go into space, ours launched a satellite, our weapons, which have been developed since Soviet times, still do not allow "friends" from abroad to live in peace.

        And then there's the Divide and Conquer principle. Where interconnected Europe has come, the crisis of one country turns into problems for the entire EU. It's a very shaky structure ...
        To assemble such strategic important units as airplanes (you will not argue that civil aviation is also a strategic potential) on a principle with the world by thread is a little frivolous. It costs one plant separately of the country to stand up (strike, accident, emergency) and ...
        As a temporary measure, it will do ... Therefore, I think it’s possible to assemble an airplane from ready-made spare parts, but at the same time you shouldn’t scream out UR and arrange a show.
    3. -2
      25 August 2011 11: 19
      I agree to a compromise. There is nowhere to go. It is necessary to make airplanes. Now the strength is not enough for ourselves, you have to order spare parts on the side.
      Quote: 916
      We do not yet reach the modern requirements (avionics, electronics, engines) - we order world manufacturers. But this is for the time being - until we pull ourselves up.

      I totally agree. Ideally - we will be later.
      As for the reviews of someone who saw close, rumpeljschtizhen gave a link.
      China is not a benchmark. Copying already produced and sold - a step backward and stealing from ourselves - neither development experience, during which new solutions appear, nor respect from the world community.
  9. -1
    25 August 2011 09: 57
    Break through then break through, not the first time ... the whole question: where and at what price?
    Yes, in Zadornov’s blog (I’m a respected person, at least for patriotism) there are a lot of emotions aimed at one person. And it’s not right to judge the state of affairs in our aviation industry.
    So there was a mixture of water and oil. Yes, Putin behaves like a master. But where are the planes?
    By the way, about the collapse. Voronezh plant (VASO) is not in ruin, it works. not in three shifts, as in Soviet times, but not in one every other day, as under Yeltsin. In two. Collect airplanes, as before. For whom I don’t know, the level of information is not the same (I have a neighbor on the entrance where the bus driver works. That is, there are minibuses on the territory, all three routes).
    A closed loop - yes, it would be nice. But now obviously we will not pull. So there is much to strive for. Previously, something to cope. Yes, with the sawing will become more problematic, it already depends on who is in power (attack is not in favor of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, if that), respectively, with the current level of theft and sale of the country no longer in pieces, but hardly, that will improve.
    Yes, I would like to be the first and the best. But you have to be as you are.