In the combined arms army of the Central Military District will receive the latest weapons

71
By the end of the year, the combined army of the Central District will receive about 450 units. weapons and military equipment, the newspaper said MIC with reference to the press service of the Central Military District.



In particular, the peacekeeping brigade will receive modernized armored vehicles BTR-82AM and will create a BLA unit, which will be armed with 13-th unmanned systems, including Orlan-10, Tachyon-3, Leer-3 and Eleron -3.

In the anti-aircraft missile brigade put about 60-KAMAZ-53501 cars. In addition, the connection will receive 30 units of communication equipment, including 8 satellite communication stations "Sphere".
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    19 August 2014 19: 22
    Who wants peace is always ready for war! soldier
    1. +11
      19 August 2014 19: 27
      By the end of the year, the combined arms army of the Central District will receive about 450 units of weapons and military equipment,

      What can I say - handsome ... army men, in the face of the military-industrial complex, keep their word. So keep it up!
      1. +17
        19 August 2014 20: 33
        I can imagine what kind of enthusiasm now reigns in various research institutes, design bureaus, NGOs and other "mailboxes". The growth in defense spending is undeniable. Imagine how many promising developments were gathering dust under the cloth in the shameful 90s, and many of them are relevant to this day. How many projects can be reanimated and brought to the testing stage at the present time !!!. Just tell our defenders that the country needs them again and they will move mountains and do everything that is required of them! And they will do it beautifully, gracefully, practical, cheap and most importantly inimitable. Time-tested!
        1. Leonidych
          +2
          19 August 2014 20: 35
          and what a horror in NATO
        2. +8
          19 August 2014 22: 35
          Yes, this is probably great, but how many enterprises survived, in our city 60% of the factories worked for defense. The instrument factory made electronics: sensors, relays, diodes, etc. etc. they did this from refrigerators to astronautics, a plant in the city center as soon as the director of a veteran and a hero of labor died, and with it the plant flourished, he was immediately bankrupted and a shopping center was built. and our rockets are now falling, and 7 unemployed have increased in the city, it’s great what to say and what’s next, there are no developers, they are now system administrators in banks and they don’t need proprietary devices. Who will do this, buy in China? The last factory did kungs and PfP on the basis of the Urals, if there were orders, its property was sold under the hammer now, thank God it has a state order and did not manage to ruin it. This is how we protect the defense industry. Workers of the first plant, pensioners, honorary citizens of the city wrote THREE times a letter to the president, and even he once promised to figure it out, and still plundered the creatures. So it would be someone to rejoice, by the way, the instruments that our instrument factory produced now are made by China under the brand of the instrument factory, and the missiles are falling. In how.
        3. everest-82
          -4
          20 August 2014 00: 34
          Quote: Stalevar
          how many promising developments were gathering dust under the cloth in the infamous 90s,

          You don’t have a clue in the way you study history. History is not judged, but lessons are learned and there is no subjunctive mood for it - learn the primer. The story was difficult and there was nothing shameful in it, because it was our story - do you understand? This is now all such clever people - with a backward mind.
          1. 0
            20 August 2014 02: 15
            Quote: everest-82
            - do you understand?

            I apologize to you. And I agree with the rest!
          2. +1
            20 August 2014 07: 15
            You don’t have a clue in the way you study history. History is not judged, but lessons are learned and there is no subjunctive mood for it - learn the primer. The story was difficult and there was nothing shameful in it, because it was our story - do you understand? This is now all such clever people - with a backward mind.
            Dear everest-82! Good manners are not your feature! And, judging by your conclusion, you didn't even take the primer into your hands. By the way, are you a historian? And do you have an approach to studying it, or do you just have "concepts"?
    2. MSA
      MSA
      +6
      19 August 2014 19: 29
      Whatever the desire to attack you, one must be strong.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +10
        19 August 2014 20: 06
        COMPLEX "LEER" WITH UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE "ORLAN-10" The multifunctional unmanned complex "Orlan-10" was developed by the enterprise "Special Technology Center". The complex is designed to assess the situation, control and monitor extended and local objects in hard-to-reach areas, including during search, repair and rescue operations. The unmanned vehicle included in the complex has a takeoff weight of up to 11,5 kg and a wingspan of about 2,4 m. The UAV can fly up to 4 hours at a distance of up to 50 km from the ground control station. According to the developers, Orlan-10 can hang in the air for 10 hours. The tested flight range of the Orlan is 1 km one way. The aircraft will have to shoot the terrain at such a distance autonomously - the transmitter works only at 125 km. A wide range of control and measuring equipment can be placed on board the UAV. The presence of a generator on board allows the use of active loads throughout the flight. Video and photography are provided in combination with the registration of current parameters (coordinates, height, frame number, etc.). In January 2012, "Orlan-10" in the GLITS in Akhtubinsk completed state tests - they took place from January 3 to 15. At the same time, representatives of the Ground Forces, who will operate tactical intelligence, were satisfied with the apparatus. The complex is mounted on the basis of a KAMAZ vehicle. It will include at least three unmanned aerial vehicles. From one control point, you can immediately control 4 Orlan-10 UAVs, while one of them can serve as a data relay for the rest, which increases the overall range of the group. The takeoff weight of the UAV is up to 14 kg, of which 5 kg is payload. "Orlan-10" is launched from a collapsible catapult and lands by parachute. It is capable of developing an airspeed of 90-150 km / h, stay in the air for up to 16 hours, overcoming about 600 km during this time, and climb to a height of up to 5 km. COMPOSITION OF THE SET • ground control station • 2 UAVs in transport cases • launcher • set of spare parts and accessories • specialized software • interchangeable payloads INTERCHANGEABLE TARGETS • camera • video camera • gyro-stabilized all-round TV camera gyro-stabilized all-round IR camera radio emission dosimeter TARGET LOAD FUNCTIONS aerial photography, day and night (thermal imaging) aerial video filming and video surveillance, radiation background measurements AREAS OF APPLICATION environmental monitoring, prospecting, mapping, protection of important facilities and public events, patrolling pipelines and power lines, monitoring the development and assessing the consequences of emergencies, monitoring the state of architectural monuments and nature reserves, assessing the state of territories for construction, meteorological reconnaissance, advertising aerial photography.
        1. +6
          19 August 2014 20: 12
          ELERON-3СВ
          Purpose: it is the carrier of the target equipment of television, photo or thermal imaging and serves to deliver it to a given area and return to the landing site in accordance with a given route.
          Manufacturer and country: CJSC "Enix", Russia
          Engine: Electric
          Dimensions: length - 0,635 m, width - 1,47 m
          Weight: take-off weight - 4,3 kg.
          Productivity: speed - 70-130km / h, flight duration: up to 2 h, maximum height - 5000m
          Payload: TV camera, digital camera, IR camera, relay and jamming system, dropable container, weather balloon
          Data Channel: Any for IR transmission
          Take-off: with a rubber harness or pneumatic catapult
          Landing: by parachute
          System components: UAV and NSU
          NSO: ruggedized laptop, ground station software
          UAV "Eleron-3SV" is a special short-range reconnaissance vehicle. The UAV is adapted for the installation of a replaceable modular payload: - a television 10-fold camera in a three-coordinate gyro-stabilized gimbal; - thermal imaging camera 640X520 (Pal) in a gyro-stabilized three-coordinate suspension; - cameras. The glider is sealed. The navigation and flight system is assembled on the latest element base, which made it possible to radically expand its capabilities. Fully updated software. The UAV's payload and climb rate have been increased. Acoustically invisible.
          1. +6
            19 August 2014 21: 08
            Quote: Duke
            ELERON-3СВ


            one to one, German "Horten 229" (Ho 229) ... only German "Horten" with RGD ...
            1. +1
              19 August 2014 21: 46
              Quote: cosmos111
              only German "Horten" with RGD ...

              and with the pilot.
            2. +2
              19 August 2014 22: 07
              Quote: cosmos111
              one to one, German "Horten 229" (Ho 229) ... only German "Horten" with RGD ...

              A modern example.
              Northrop B-2 Spirit (eng. Northrop B-2 Spirit) is an American heavy stealth strategic bomber developed by Northrop Grumman.

              The classic flying wing.
              1. +1
                20 August 2014 02: 23
                Quote: Duke
                a stealth strategic bomber developed by Northrop Grumman.

                Subtle for whom?
            3. +2
              19 August 2014 22: 18
              Horten Ho IX (also Gotha Go 229 - An experimental jet aircraft, the development of which was carried out in Germany during the Second World War. The aerodynamic design is a flying wing. Designed by the Horten brothers since the 1931 of the year. The world's first jet-powered flying wing aircraft.
              At first, a flight simulator was built, which was driven by two As 10c piston engines with pushing screws, had dual controls and was called Ho VII. This aircraft first flew in the 1943 year. To maintain secrecy, the device was officially intended for aerodynamic tests and as a communications aircraft.
              Another team of engineers, led by the brothers, began assembling the apparatus for two jet engines. Officially, neither of the two projects was approved by the Reich Ministry of Aviation, however, the Horten brothers had extensive political connections, and they were able to demonstrate the drawings of the apparatus to G. Goering, who had recently announced a project competition for the 1000 * 1000 * 1000 program (airplane flying at a speed of 1000 km / h, at a range of 1000 km and carrying a bomb load of 1000 kg), after which he decided to make every effort to get the plane into the air as soon as possible [1] [2].
              1 March 1944 year in Gottingen the first flight took place. In total, there were 6 aircraft at various stages of production, and units for 20 machines were ordered for the needs of the Luftwaffe fighter aircraft. Two planes rose into the air.
              On 14 of April 1945 of the year, units of the 8 Corps of the 3 Army of the USA occupied the factory in Friedrichsrode. One of the aircraft was dismantled and transported to the United States.
              1. +2
                19 August 2014 22: 37
                The first Soviet flying wing.
                BEACH-14 is a five-seat passenger "flying wing". The appearance of this aircraft at the end of 1934 was preceded by purges of the BEACH-10 model - the first version of a twin-engine parabola aircraft. Then the project was slightly modified and the aircraft received the designation BEACH-14. It was built in the Central Design Bureau at the plant named after Menzhinsky.
                The first flights of Yu. I. Piontkovsky were at the end of 1934. In 1936, the aircraft was transferred to the Air Force Research Institute for testing. Flew P.M. Stefanovsky, M.A. Nyukhtikov, I.F. Petrov. The plane had insufficient stability and controllability. In the BEACH-14, the aileron flaps and elevators were almost symmetrical in profile and proved to be less effective, requiring a large consumption of rudders for landing. The rudder was off-blown, with propellers from two engines. Apparently, the presence of two star-shaped engines in front of the wing edge was also harmful. Tests continued until 1937.
                The test pilots gave the plane the offensive name "half a blin" and expressed the opinion that this was not a very good joke of aircraft designers. Tests continued until 1937. Ultimately, the tests of the BICH-14 ended in failure. The aircraft had insufficient stability and controllability, and low flight characteristics.
                The construction is wooden with a canvas, with the exception of a five-seat cockpit on a parabola wing, made of duralumin and smoothly turning into a vertical tail. Due to the large scope (16,2 m) and the area (60 m2) in the wing, connectors were made, the center wing span is 33 m. The wing has four spars and 60 ribs of a shaped design. On engines - townend rings.
          2. +2
            19 August 2014 22: 33
            I do not think that drones of this type (Orlan, Aileron) should cross the front line: they do not have means of self-defense, i.e. they are defenseless. They just have to rise in the rear and survey the surroundings for as long as their technical vision is enough. It is very doubtful that the resolution of 640x520 is enough for something sensible. Back in the mid-90s, near-infrared matrices were made on Electron with a resolution of 2048x2048. Alas...
      3. net abortion
        +13
        19 August 2014 20: 21
        Quote: MSA
        to be strong.


        The punitive battalions "Donbass", "Azov" and "Dnepr" are trying to break into the depths of Ilovaisk, fighting with the militia of the DNI.

        Punishers are held back by a unit of the Donbass People’s Militia deployed to the city under the command of Motorola. Resistance fighters conduct street battles, destroying assault groups and firing points of punishers.

        At the moment, ukronazists they make unsuccessful attempts to advance into the city from the side of the railway station and suffer serious losses.
        1. +5
          19 August 2014 20: 41
          Quote: net abort
          The punitive battalion "Donbass", "Azov" and "Dnepr" are trying to break into the depths of Ilovaisk

          And here is what the goats in Makeevka did:
          "An OSCE team went to the site of the kindergarten in Makeyevka, where, according to the militia, as a result of the shelling, at least 10 children were killed.
          Our OSCE is in a very difficult situation. Shells fall next to them - one fell 200 meters away, the other 600 meters away. It is impossible not to notice it. And if they notice, why are these issues not being considered in Europe? ”Purgin said.
          RIA News

          Sorry, not in the middle of the article, but it really revolted me!
        2. Tyumen
          +1
          19 August 2014 21: 17
          Motorola. When, ignoramuses, learn to write correctly?
    3. +20
      19 August 2014 19: 41
      It is very good! But today on the TVCv program "The Right to Vote", some Russians and the invited foreign citizen argued that NATO expansion to the east is not. Fictions are spoken. And there are no NATO bases, not in the Baltics, not in Romania, not in Poland, and American troops are not being sluggishly pulled together in the Baltics, Poland, Romania. They say lies. NATO has some advantages and security not only for Europe, but also for Russia. Absurd - of course, but this is not argued by dill with dill brains, not by a Chinese, but by our Russians. Probably their goal in life is to dismember and destroy Russia for the sake of mercantile goals.
      1. +7
        19 August 2014 19: 50
        Quote: juborg
        It is very good! But today on the TVCv program "The Right to Vote", some Russians and the invited foreign citizen argued that NATO expansion to the east is not. Fictions are spoken. And there are no NATO bases, not in the Baltics, not in Romania, not in Poland, and American troops are not being sluggishly pulled together in the Baltics, Poland, Romania. They say lies. NATO has some advantages and security not only for Europe, but also for Russia. Absurd - of course, but this is not argued by dill with dill brains, not by a Chinese, but by our Russians. Probably their goal in life is to dismember and destroy Russia for the sake of mercantile goals.

        Unfortunately, some journalists, for the sake of pseudo-objectiveness, are damaging their country. The war is going on while it is mainly informational, but it is still impossible to take the side of the enemy.
      2. +6
        19 August 2014 19: 50
        peacekeeping brigade will receive upgraded armored vehicles BTR-82AM
        In anti-aircraft missile brigade will deliver about 60 KamAZ-53501 vehicles
        Things are good . Only Serdyukov's "brigades" are confused. Just like dill. They returned the Taman and Kantemirovsk divisions, and when will the rest be returned? Or will we continue to shrink?
        1. +2
          19 August 2014 20: 21
          Quote: enot73
          Returned Taman and Kantemirov divisions


          Yeah, "returned". Now these are single-brigade divisions.
        2. 0
          19 August 2014 20: 42
          Quote: enot73
          Things are good . Only Serdyukov's "brigades" are confused. Just like dill. They returned the Taman and Kantemirovsk divisions, and when will the rest be returned? Or will we continue to shrink?

          Are you sure that the division is better (division commander - general)? I believe, from "head" to "tail" - a minimum of intermediaries. And you prove your case - they will return.
          1. +3
            19 August 2014 20: 55
            Quote: Waterfowl
            Are you sure that the division is better (division commander - general)? I believe, from "head" to "tail" - a minimum of intermediaries. And you prove your case - they will return.
            IMHO, divisions and brigades are needed to solve various tasks, but in our case, when the army was cutting and selling everything and everything, they simply turned the divisions into brigades.
          2. +4
            19 August 2014 22: 16
            Waterfowl
            Quote: enot73
            Things are good . Only Serdyukov's "brigades" are confused. Just like dill. They returned the Taman and Kantemirovsk divisions, and when will the rest be returned? Or will we continue to shrink?
            Are you sure that the division is better (division commander - general)? I believe, from "head" to "tail" - a minimum of intermediaries. And you prove your case - they will return.

            And I am sure that one reinforced motorized rifle regiment is not able to cope with the tasks previously performed by a motorized rifle division of four regimental composition. At the same time, I am sure that the divisional kit with which this regiment has been reinforced will only hinder the possibility of its movement and maneuver, and increase the time it takes to bring the regiment into combat readiness. In addition, the use in the interests of only three or four battalions of combat, technical and logistical support, designed for sixteen battalions, is an "unnecessary" luxury and makes the formation not a mobile brigade, but a clumsy caterpillar. The meaning of the brigade is maneuverability, mobility and speed. In this case, this is not a brigade, but a mockery of combat tactics and disregard for military science. Just calculate how much this "reinforced regiment" will move to the combat destination area and what amount of extra tasks a modern "regiment" commander will solve without intermediate links "with a minimum of intermediaries" by analogy with the Soviet regimental command? Instead of completing a combat mission with three battalions, he will pull his rear tail along the roads clogged with vehicles for a week. Therefore, with the advent of the brigade, the troops acquired a headache, and not a new look.
        3. s1н7т
          +2
          19 August 2014 21: 40
          Quote: enot73
          Or will we continue to decline?

          No, it's just nowhere. And more - the economy does not allow, probably (I mean its current model). Or politics. Or something else. But our local OMON, for example, is able to take a battle on the defensive against a mechanized brigade - they only have tanks and barrel artillery. The rest is newer than in the army. And then there is SOBR and other "internal" personal belongings. And all this is in almost every decent city. Where does the money for the army come from? laughing Plus the "special forces" of the Ministry of Emergencies, plus the explosives, plus the FSB, plus, plus, plus. An internal enemy is more frightening than an external one. And so, yes, I agree, divisions are more relevant for us than restless brigades. It seems that in the USA and Germany there are also brigades, but as part of the notorious divisions laughing It’s just that ours is read all the way to the middle only, probably laughing
          There were also brigades / corps in the Union, but only where necessary. And these - all under one comb. What is an air base, for example, I still do not understand. Will this base remain a base during the database or fly along the fronts / armies? In any form? reformers!
    4. +2
      19 August 2014 19: 47
      the main thing is not to modernize the army with militarism.
    5. master 84
      +2
      19 August 2014 23: 53
      something like
      Maybe in this way the president decided to celebrate the approaching six-month anniversary of the beginning of the "Crimean Spring", or maybe something else ... the head of state knows better.
  2. +7
    19 August 2014 19: 23
    So again, the good news came, just like a balm for the soul.
    1. +7
      19 August 2014 19: 37
      This is yet another confirmation that the program for the rearmament of the army and navy is on track! Yes, I don’t argue now that the country is in a difficult and sometimes even difficult situation, but at the heart of it remained the old military training "Everything for the front, everything for victory!" And the cold war is in full swing and you need to be prepared that the fire of war can flare up at any moment, and an example of this is non-stale where they are stubbornly trying to inflate it and throw it into our house! They go to all sorts of meanness and tricks to drag us into this cesspool! Since our opponents have very great debts and problems, and only WAR can write off all this! And how in their death throes, falling into their grave, they are looking for someone else to take there with them !!
      1. +1
        19 August 2014 20: 04
        In particular, the peacekeeping brigade will receive

        This is already interesting .. (I hope this is what I think) ... bully
    2. +3
      19 August 2014 20: 15
      And I was upset. Read what BTR-82AM is. In contrast to the BTR-82A, they do not have anti-fragmentation lining, APU, air conditioning and enhanced transmission. But at the same time, the BTR-82A costs 22 million, and the BTR-82AM 20,8 million rubles.

      The Oboronservis guys turned out to be much more greedy than the Arzamas Deripaska guys ...
      1. +2
        19 August 2014 20: 37
        It seems to me that it is necessary to diversify equipment on the 2 TVD - a large-scale classic war (under which the current armored personnel carriers, tanks, infantry fighting vehicles are important, for which low altitude, speed, buoyancy, protection against nuclear weapons, frontal armor, ease of manufacture and low cost are important) and counterguerrilla / terrorist war (which requires all sorts of MPMs, super tanks, South African wheel things, and so on - which do not care about the height of the silhouette, do not need buoyancy, do not need protection from nuclear weapons, do not need special speed to the detriment of the mass of armor, do not need duplicate engines ate and so on, but you need circular armor and comfort)
        1. +2
          19 August 2014 20: 46
          You are somewhat mistaken. All of these MRAPs and stuff are imprisoned for occupation. But in order to begin to implement it, it is necessary to first capture the territory.

          So all these counter-guerrilla and other counter-terrorism stray must be non-staff, stored on the BHVT and given to the units performing the occupation or peacekeeping functions in case of need.
          1. +1
            19 August 2014 20: 59
            I think this is a little mistaken, and I would especially note that they did not even read well what I wrote. I didn’t say the current equipment as a waste and build instead, but I said it was necessary to produce different equipment for different tasks. This means that in the classic war the army will use its own equipment for the army, and for counter-guerrilla and so on related operations will have its own equipment.
            1. +2
              19 August 2014 22: 08
              moreover, trucks in the combat zone must be equipped with armored cabs with mine protection without fail !!!

              and other wheeled chassis, weapon carriers !!!

              SAMIL- 100 South Africa ((load capacity 10 tons

              MLRS "Valkyrie" Mk2 - 127-mm South Africa: on the Samil 100 6x6 chassis
          2. 0
            19 August 2014 21: 59
            Quote: Spade
            All of these MRAPs and stuff are imprisoned for occupation.


            Rather, the rocks of the antiterrorist war (((Chechnya 1,2)))) and keeping the seized territory under control .....
            when the enemy does not have heavy weapons ((tanks, self-propelled guns, etc.)))

            although the army of South Africa, used MRAP and in the war with the regular army of Angola and the Cuban volunteers ..... who had all kinds of weapons + air force ...

            Column Casspir Mk-IV Army of South Africa in Angola in the 80s ...
      2. 0
        19 August 2014 21: 41
        Quote: Spade
        BTR-82AM 20,8 million rubles.


        then it is already BTR-80A and it cost 16 ml .. rubles ...
  3. +4
    19 August 2014 19: 23
    Apparently before the end of the year in Ukraine they plan to restore order! Attention was focused on peacekeepers.
    1. +1
      19 August 2014 19: 50
      Quote: Mole
      Apparently before the end of the year in Ukraine they plan to restore order! Attention was focused on peacekeepers.

      Well, they didn’t decide, but the pacifics clean
  4. +6
    19 August 2014 19: 24
    In particular, the peacekeeping brigade will receive upgraded armored vehicles ...


    What is it for?
    1. +2
      19 August 2014 19: 31
      Quote: Veteran of the Red Army
      What is it for?

      laughing To changes in the staffing.
      From now on, the composition of each combined arms army will include a peacekeeping brigade (WorldBr). soldier
      1. +5
        19 August 2014 19: 41
        Quote: Vasek
        Peacekeeping Brigade (World Br)
        WorldBr ... what... No.
        ICBMs. Yes
        1. +5
          19 August 2014 19: 45
          Quote: retired
          ICBMs

          laughing
          Let the enemies think: an intercontinental ballistic missile!
          good drinks
        2. +6
          19 August 2014 19: 51
          Quote: retired
          WorldBr ... ...
          ICBMs.

          Yeah, that sounds good: ICBM has advanced into the conflict zone. With ten divisions ... divisions.
    2. +1
      19 August 2014 20: 28
      They have long been peacekeepers. Transnistria, Abkhazia ... 15 Motorized Rifle Brigade. There are 138 more Motorized Rifle Brigades, also from 1992 peacekeeping
  5. +3
    19 August 2014 19: 25
    Whatever the day, good news! Always would be! wink
  6. +6
    19 August 2014 19: 27
    Quote: Giant thought
    So again, the good news came, just like a balm for the soul.

    The amount of good news is growing! From all some kind of joyful euphoria. By God, I would love to go to serve in a new way
  7. +5
    19 August 2014 19: 28
    Another great news is 180 kg GNK. Pure heroin detained, well done guys!
  8. +3
    19 August 2014 19: 28
    Quote: Veteran of the Red Army
    In particular, the peacekeeping brigade will receive modernized armored vehicles ...

    What is it for?

    We will not force anyone to peace ... Russia is a peace-loving country!
  9. +3
    19 August 2014 19: 28
    Yes, the situation dictates its own laws. The main thing is to continue to work. It is impossible to sleep RUSSIA. soldier
    1. DDR
      +3
      19 August 2014 19: 33
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      You can’t sleep RUSSIA


      RUSSIA woke up, and some are scared!
      1. Stalker
        +5
        19 August 2014 19: 43
        RUSSIA woke up, and some are scared!

        The West thought that Russia was on its knees, and it turns out to be tied with shirts on berets !!! laughing
    2. FACKtoREAL
      +1
      19 August 2014 19: 36
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      The Commander-in-Chief is to continue to work

      And what did Glafcom mean? what
      ... pokhotnava ali marskova? belay
      1. +3
        19 August 2014 19: 45
        And what did Glafcom mean?
        ....... Vyrkhovnava
  10. Ivan 63
    +1
    19 August 2014 19: 37
    How tired of the cynicism of the West, about ukrov-generally no words.
    1. lord
      +3
      19 August 2014 19: 55
      This is true, from lies already sick ... sad
      The fact that new weapons are entering the army is not euphoria, it should be so! Just unfortunately, we are already accustomed to the collapse of the army, and in Soviet times the army was much more efficient than the present (relative to that time, of course) and the supply of new weapons was the norm.
  11. +3
    19 August 2014 19: 53
    A disgrace. dense as th .. about the mammoth BTR. although how to modify it, one, a corpse. Well, the billions spent on the micro La-7, on batteries with a joystick.
  12. +3
    19 August 2014 19: 55
    BTR-82 is not a new technology. As for drones and vehicles I will not say, apparently for sure new. Like the connection. But here you need to know for sure.
    It’s a pity it still hasn’t come to Armata, Boomerang, Kurgan, Warrior.
    1. +2
      19 August 2014 20: 13
      Well, this is not just about the BTR-82, but about the latest modification of the BTR-82AM, but what kind of modification is not in the know, we are all waiting for 15 years ...
      1. +5
        20 August 2014 00: 13
        In this article, it is generally not clear what this is about! It feels like it was written by another girl in a mini-skirt with white hair, loudly called a "military special correspondent". Recently, the presentation of events on the military topic in almost all media is so amateurish and illiterate that sometimes the expressions used are simply annoying.
        What does the phrase mean: "will receive about 450 units weapons and military equipment "or
        "the peacekeeping brigade will receive modernized armored vehicles BTR-82AM and create a UAV unit in its composition."
        Apparently, the author wanted to convey the following information that "... modernized armored personnel carriers BTR-82AM will be supplied to the armament of motorized rifle brigades performing peacekeeping tasks in zones of military conflicts, in addition, regular UAV units will be formed as part of such formations ..."
        This is the height of illiteracy. At the same time, the person who wrote this article in the military-industrial complex with reference to the press service of the Central Military District is apparently confident that he is presenting information in the correct military language. Otherwise, how to explain such verbiage. When from the TV screen on the central channel the phrase "military operations" is uttered with complete seriousness, instead of "military operations" or "military unit" instead of "military unit" I personally begin to regret that censorship has been abolished in the country. I get the impression that the censorship in the USSR did not so much set limits in the content of the information being conveyed as poked the noses of stupid "correspondents" into mistakes at the level of the school curriculum, excluding the possibility of them disgracing the state with their illiteracy at the world level.
  13. +7
    19 August 2014 20: 05
    It's nice that the army will receive "... 450 units of weapons and military equipment ...".
    It’s unpleasant that it’s even less than a drop in the ocean.
    Help to explain my thoughts.
    Combined arms army is 2-5 divisions, depending on the task.
    The staff number of the division (motor rifle) is approximately 10000 people, the number of tanks in the division is approximately 300 units, and the BMP is not less.
    As indicated in the article, radio stations are also included in the concept of "weapons and military equipment", on my own I will add - a field kitchen too.
    2-5 divisions - 20000-50000 people, that is, in any case, 20000-50000 small arms. Divided by 450 we get a complete replacement in 44 - 111 YEARS.
    It’s time to cry, and not Yury to scream.
    1. +2
      19 August 2014 23: 19
      Well, it’s clear that it’s not a small weapon. Armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, drones, etc.
      No need to make jokes. We are on the verge of either us or us. Both the army and the navy are what does not allow us to "bomb us into the stone age."
      Well and the Strategic Missile Forces, of course.
      1. 0
        20 August 2014 20: 12
        Mountain arrow.
        I do not jerk.
        Most likely, the unknown author of the article believes that the site has a large number of people of little knowledge in the basics of military construction, not construction for the military, but the construction of the armed forces.
        For you, I repeat - only tanks and infantry fighting vehicles (armored personnel carriers) in one division are more than 600 pieces, but this is in units of measurement, and the army even has a bread factory.
        And we do not stand on the verge of either we or us. WE stand on the brink of ANYTHING.
    2. 0
      20 August 2014 00: 50
      You are generally right, except that you assess the situation by Soviet standards. The modern Combined Arms Army is not the 2-5 motorized rifle (tank) divisions, but the 1,5-3 motley brigade. The number of some OA does not even exceed the number of the Soviet motorized rifle or tank division. Rather, it is not an army, but an unfinished corps.
      1. 0
        20 August 2014 19: 48
        figter

        Quote
        "You are generally right, except that you assess the situation by Soviet standards."

        I think that in peacetime the personnel and weapons and equipment of the army are equipped with peacetime staff, and in case of wartime, each army has a mobilization plan that provides for a certain amount of weapons and equipment stored in various warehouses or obtained from national economy and their number is much larger than we imagine and the peace army commander bears responsibility for all this and all this property has storage periods.
  14. +2
    19 August 2014 20: 10
    New technology never hurts
  15. +1
    19 August 2014 20: 23
    Sphere satellite communications station - does anyone know what kind of animal it is? Secret? Information on it is zero ......
  16. +2
    19 August 2014 20: 24
    Quote: rasputin17
    Who wants peace is always ready for war! soldier

    Already getting ready!
    The facts speak for themselves.
    We are restoring the bomb shelters that were abandoned during our rapid reconstruction.
    I am tired of everything!
    21st century - and we are at war.
    Stupidity.
    The court will be for these pid..sov on whose conscience the death of their own people, especially children.
    For a long time they will avenge the death of loved ones.
    Simply, it will not end with a peaceful dialogue.
    1. +2
      19 August 2014 20: 32
      Either humanity will end war, or war will end humanity.

      John Fitzgerald Kennedy
  17. Arh
    +2
    19 August 2014 20: 28
    We will watch and admire the new army of the Russian Federation !!!
  18. +3
    19 August 2014 20: 55
    It will not be enough. Not enough! request
  19. 0
    19 August 2014 20: 57
    If you do not want to feed your army, you will feed someone else's !!!
  20. +2
    19 August 2014 21: 01
    For drones, it is ideal to use recognizable replicas of the Second World War, MB reduced only in size!
  21. +2
    19 August 2014 21: 11
    Time for a change. Not like the nineties.
  22. +2
    19 August 2014 21: 17
    The price of this and other "ahrine" equipment is worthless if Novorossiya does not drive the fascists away.
  23. The Art of War
    +2
    19 August 2014 21: 18
    http://lenta.ru/news/2014/08/19/avto/ Наши новые санкции good
  24. +1
    19 August 2014 22: 22
    anti-aircraft missile brigade - I suppose "alkynskaya", pancake showcases. Better would be Buk-m3 and tor-M2 to the troops. By the way, where are the promised S-300V4 brigades?
  25. +3
    19 August 2014 22: 30
    This is of course good, new equipment is coming in, etc. One nuance - new or "deeply modernized"?
    What about the latest reports on the scrapping of the S300 air defense missile systems in Syria? And Iran? We probably have an overabundance of air defense weapons ?! And this is with the greatest extent of the borders! Let us recall how the last US & NATO wars fought - 1) the destruction of the enemy's air defense 2) with complete air supremacy, swatting everything and everyone on the ground (ground forces, military and civilian infrastructure, etc.) And against this background - our attempt to "cross the snake and a hedgehog "as Prokopenko said (the association of the Air Force and Air Defense) - another stupidity of one of the regular ministers of the Ministry of Defense. I think these S300s would be useful for our army either at not the most important training units or in the 2nd, 3rd echelons of defense.
  26. +1
    20 August 2014 02: 32
    Not in the subject. ONE, only one, supposedly independent Baltic "country" needs to be LOWERED economically to such an extent that the rest of the underdogs forget WHERE RUSSIA IS!
  27. T-44
    0
    20 August 2014 07: 22
    The West is clearly set to war with Russia, judging by the softening of rhetoric, now they still did not dare to do so. It is necessary to take maximum advantage of this time to strengthen the country's defense capabilities.