Svanidze is an ally of Germany
Nikolai Karlovich Svanidze - one of the “talking heads” that often appears on the screen, furiously muddies history their homeland. It is not by chance that the Goebbels Prize was awarded to him. Why is he often invited to radio and TV? That is why. Because it will broadcast a volley of anti-Russian and anti-state cliches and myths. And so valuable.
But recently, on the air of a conscientious television channel with dubious foreign funding called “The Rain”, he said words to which I would like to pay special attention.
In the next program of this TV channel, where a decent person after a blasphemous questioning about the blockade and walking is impossible, Nikolai Svanidze said:
"And everything I have mentioned: the annexation of the Baltic countries, the Finnish war, the invasion of Poland as an ally of Hitler's Germany, this is part of the Second World War."
Recently, liberals have begun to use one trick especially often: to call the USSR an ally of Germany. This is not an accident, this is not a trend. This is a reception. This is the first stage of the Window Overton - the technology of dehumanization. Its meaning is in the consistent and systematic introduction of certain images and concepts into the public consciousness, with the goal of making some previously impossible things trivial and self-evident.
The thesis "The USSR and Germany are allies at the first stage of the Second World War" was removed from the state of "absurdity" to the state of "personal opinion." Moreover, the opinion of the “historian” - and Mr. Svanidze is positioning himself that way, until he is pinned to the wall by uncomfortable questions. Then he admits that he is not a historian and everything that was written and what he said is just his opinion, which has nothing to do with historical science.
The next step is the formation of a sustainable thesis “The USSR, on a par with Germany, is to blame for unleashing World War II.” He was supposedly an ally. And finally - the final. From here, just one step to the accusation of the USSR in the outbreak of the Second World War. And even the Great Patriotic. And what will sound quite logical, if we introduce the original thesis in the category of "undoubted facts." And then - next gloom.
After all, this is exactly how the new generation of Nazis in Ukraine was being raised - a small step here, then another - there ... Here they slightly corrected history, they shifted the accent - and now Bandera is fighting the Nazis and the Soviet army "for an independent Ukraine." And the killer and the terrorist becomes a hero.
And now the historical truth. An ally is not just a term. This is a statement of the existence of a UNION AGREEMENT. Let's set Nikolai Karlovich a direct question: when and where did the Soviet Union conclude an allied treaty with Germany? And we do not need emotions and evasions. Show the union contract.
The historical truth is this - there was no union between the USSR and Germany.
What happened?
1. There was a non-aggression pact, between the two countries from 23 August 1939. Especially for Svanidze cite his text. Let him show lines in which the parties pledge to support each other with armed force.
Nonaggression Pact between Germany and the Soviet Union
Government of the USSR and the Government of Germany
Guided by the desire to strengthen the cause of peace between the USSR and Germany, and proceeding from the main provisions of the treaty of neutrality concluded between the USSR and Germany in April 1926, the following agreement was reached:
Article I
Both Contracting Parties undertake to refrain from any violence, from any aggressive action and any attack against each other, both separately and jointly with other powers.
Article II
In the event that one of the Contracting Parties becomes the object of military action by a third power, the other Contracting Party will not support this power in any form.
Article III
The governments of both Contracting Parties will remain in contact with each other in the future for consultation in order to inform each other about issues affecting their common interests.
Article IV
None of the Contracting Parties will participate in any grouping of powers that directly or indirectly directed against the other party.
Article V
In the event of a dispute or conflict between Contracting Parties on issues of one kind or another, both parties will resolve these disputes or conflicts exclusively by peaceful means in a friendly exchange of views or, if necessary, by setting up commissions to resolve the conflict.
Article VI
This contract is concluded for a period of ten years so that since one of the Contracting Parties does not denounce it a year before the expiration of the term, the contract is automatically renewed for the next five years.
Article VII.
This treaty is subject to ratification as soon as possible. The exchange of instruments of ratification must take place in Berlin. The contract enters into force immediately after its signing.
Compiled in two originals, in German and Russian, in Moscow, August 23 1939.
In the contract, not a word about the union.
What other treaties did the USSR and Germany have before 22 of June 1941 of the year, which Hitler terminated with his attack on a par with the agreement of 23.08. 1939?
The trade agreements and credit texts (Germany gave a loan to the Soviet Union to buy equipment, the latest military equipment, etc. from it). Countries trade, and there’s nothing special about it. No union. On the emotional promise of Svanidze, “that de Hitler was traded,” we will answer that the USSR traded equally with Great Britain and France until its defeat. From trade did not refuse, traded with all countries, remaining in the PART FROM WORLD WAR! Why Svanidze does not call Germany the US ally? After all, the States traded with Hitler until he declared war on them after Pearl Harbor in December 1941.
Why Svanidze does not condemn Ireland? After all, 2 September 1939, the Irish officially declared their neutrality! As a result, virtually the entire Second World War, some hundred miles from the British coast, in Dublin worked the diplomatic missions of Germany, Italy, and Japan. Along with the intelligence services of these countries.
Why does not Svanidze require repentance and punishment for Sweden? That's who exactly, according to the logic of Svanidze, is an ally of Hitler. After all, Sweden supplied the whole of World War II with iron ore. And often was the ONLY source of its receipt. The Swedes would not sell ore, the whole machine of Wehrmacht would have gotten back in 1939. Where are you, Nikolai Karlovich?
But Svanidze does not condemn anyone except the USSR, because the USSR and Stalin must be demonized, and the United States, Sweden and Ireland should not. That's all.
We are interested only in those documents that at least somehow can be pulled “behind the ears” and called “union”.
After August 1939, the USSR concluded with Germany ...
AGREEMENT ON FRIENDSHIP AND THE BORDER BETWEEN THE USSR AND GERMANY.
28 SEPTEMBER 1939
After the collapse of the former Polish state, the Government of the USSR and the German Government are viewed solely as their task to restore peace and order in this territory and to provide for the peoples living there a peaceful existence corresponding to their national characteristics. To this end, they agreed on the following:
1. The Government of the USSR and the German Government establish as a border between mutual state interests on the territory of the former Polish state, which is plotted on the attached map and will be described in more detail in the additional protocol.
2. Both Parties recognize the border established in Article 1, mutual state interests as final, and eliminate any interference by third powers in this decision.
3. The necessary government reorganization in the territory to the west of the line indicated in the article is made by the German Government, in the territory to the east of this line - by the Government of the USSR.
4. The Government of the USSR and the German Government regard the above-mentioned reorganization as a reliable foundation for the further development of friendly relations between their peoples.
5. This treaty is subject to ratification. The exchange of instruments of ratification should take place as soon as possible in Berlin. The contract comes into force from the moment of its signing. Compiled in two originals, in German and Russian.
Mr. Svanidze, please show the article, which is written about the Union between the two countries?
We have a clear desire to carry out forgery - to issue a non-aggression agreement or a border for a UNION agreement. To blacken the Soviet Union, Stalin personally and to launch the process of changing public consciousness on the principle of "Overton Window".
In fact, those myths and lies that Svanidze and his ilk are trying to “squeeze” into the public consciousness are not new. In 1947, the United States launched the first information war against the USSR using precisely these terms. And the very first attack was ... in 1940.
And he broke the myths and lies that are spread today by Svanidze - V. M. Molotov, Commissar for Foreign Affairs. Broke back in February 1940.
21 February 1940, the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs Molotov, sends an indication to the USSR Ambassador to England, May. Its text is written very clearly. Reading it, you catch yourself thinking that they wrote it not only for English diplomats, but also for modern “independent” journalists and “honest” historians. After all, to create the necessary public opinion inside Britain and France, the Soviet Union in the “free press” stubbornly called and represented an ally of Berlin.
“1). We consider it ridiculous and offensive to us not only a statement, but even just the assumption that the USSR supposedly entered into a military alliance with Germany;
2) the economic agreement with Germany is only an agreement on trade, according to which export from the USSR to Germany reaches only 500 million marks, and the agreement is economically beneficial to the USSR, since the USSR receives a large number of machines and equipment from Germany, as well as a fair amount of weapons , the sale of which, as is known, was denied to us both in England and in France;
3) as the USSR was neutral, so it will remain neutral, unless, of course, Britain and France attack the USSR and force them to take up weapon.
Persistently spreading rumors about a military alliance between the USSR and Germany are being heated not only by certain elements in Germany itself to pacify England and France, but also by some agents of England and France themselves who wish to use the supposed “transition of the USSR to Germany’s camp” for their specific purposes in the field of internal politicians". / Source: O. Rzheshevsky, Stalin and Churchill, M, Eksmo, 2010, C.6
In conclusion, a small lesson in “logic from Svanidze”.
Svanidze against Stalin and the Stalinist USSR. Germany was against Stalin and the Stalinist USSR.
Germany led the information war as part of a general war against the USSR and Stalin. Svanidze leads the information war against the USSR and Stalin.
Hitler's Germany and Svanidze have the same enemies. With whom they fought (fight) in the information field.
So - Svanidze and Germany are allies in the information war against the USSR and Stalin.
Svanidze is an ally of Germany.
PS On April 24, 2014, the website of the State Committee for Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine published methodological material on the celebration of Victory Day. (http://comin.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=112237&cat_id=77135).
Nikolai Karlovich Svanidze can be very pleased. This coaching for the celebration of the Victory in Ukraine was written by his associates.
Here and "the USSR - an ally of the Third Reich", and a red poppy instead of the St. George ribbon. And the focus is not on 9, but on 8, May. Here is the “Putin regime”, by the way.
What can I say? The work of dividing our great Russian people, consisting of Great Russians, Little Russians and Belarusians, is continuing. And “Svanidze” makes their own contribution to this work ...
But recently, on the air of a conscientious television channel with dubious foreign funding called “The Rain”, he said words to which I would like to pay special attention.
In the next program of this TV channel, where a decent person after a blasphemous questioning about the blockade and walking is impossible, Nikolai Svanidze said:
"And everything I have mentioned: the annexation of the Baltic countries, the Finnish war, the invasion of Poland as an ally of Hitler's Germany, this is part of the Second World War."
Recently, liberals have begun to use one trick especially often: to call the USSR an ally of Germany. This is not an accident, this is not a trend. This is a reception. This is the first stage of the Window Overton - the technology of dehumanization. Its meaning is in the consistent and systematic introduction of certain images and concepts into the public consciousness, with the goal of making some previously impossible things trivial and self-evident.
The thesis "The USSR and Germany are allies at the first stage of the Second World War" was removed from the state of "absurdity" to the state of "personal opinion." Moreover, the opinion of the “historian” - and Mr. Svanidze is positioning himself that way, until he is pinned to the wall by uncomfortable questions. Then he admits that he is not a historian and everything that was written and what he said is just his opinion, which has nothing to do with historical science.
The next step is the formation of a sustainable thesis “The USSR, on a par with Germany, is to blame for unleashing World War II.” He was supposedly an ally. And finally - the final. From here, just one step to the accusation of the USSR in the outbreak of the Second World War. And even the Great Patriotic. And what will sound quite logical, if we introduce the original thesis in the category of "undoubted facts." And then - next gloom.
After all, this is exactly how the new generation of Nazis in Ukraine was being raised - a small step here, then another - there ... Here they slightly corrected history, they shifted the accent - and now Bandera is fighting the Nazis and the Soviet army "for an independent Ukraine." And the killer and the terrorist becomes a hero.
And now the historical truth. An ally is not just a term. This is a statement of the existence of a UNION AGREEMENT. Let's set Nikolai Karlovich a direct question: when and where did the Soviet Union conclude an allied treaty with Germany? And we do not need emotions and evasions. Show the union contract.
The historical truth is this - there was no union between the USSR and Germany.
What happened?
1. There was a non-aggression pact, between the two countries from 23 August 1939. Especially for Svanidze cite his text. Let him show lines in which the parties pledge to support each other with armed force.
Nonaggression Pact between Germany and the Soviet Union
Government of the USSR and the Government of Germany
Guided by the desire to strengthen the cause of peace between the USSR and Germany, and proceeding from the main provisions of the treaty of neutrality concluded between the USSR and Germany in April 1926, the following agreement was reached:
Article I
Both Contracting Parties undertake to refrain from any violence, from any aggressive action and any attack against each other, both separately and jointly with other powers.
Article II
In the event that one of the Contracting Parties becomes the object of military action by a third power, the other Contracting Party will not support this power in any form.
Article III
The governments of both Contracting Parties will remain in contact with each other in the future for consultation in order to inform each other about issues affecting their common interests.
Article IV
None of the Contracting Parties will participate in any grouping of powers that directly or indirectly directed against the other party.
Article V
In the event of a dispute or conflict between Contracting Parties on issues of one kind or another, both parties will resolve these disputes or conflicts exclusively by peaceful means in a friendly exchange of views or, if necessary, by setting up commissions to resolve the conflict.
Article VI
This contract is concluded for a period of ten years so that since one of the Contracting Parties does not denounce it a year before the expiration of the term, the contract is automatically renewed for the next five years.
Article VII.
This treaty is subject to ratification as soon as possible. The exchange of instruments of ratification must take place in Berlin. The contract enters into force immediately after its signing.
Compiled in two originals, in German and Russian, in Moscow, August 23 1939.
In the contract, not a word about the union.
What other treaties did the USSR and Germany have before 22 of June 1941 of the year, which Hitler terminated with his attack on a par with the agreement of 23.08. 1939?
The trade agreements and credit texts (Germany gave a loan to the Soviet Union to buy equipment, the latest military equipment, etc. from it). Countries trade, and there’s nothing special about it. No union. On the emotional promise of Svanidze, “that de Hitler was traded,” we will answer that the USSR traded equally with Great Britain and France until its defeat. From trade did not refuse, traded with all countries, remaining in the PART FROM WORLD WAR! Why Svanidze does not call Germany the US ally? After all, the States traded with Hitler until he declared war on them after Pearl Harbor in December 1941.
Why Svanidze does not condemn Ireland? After all, 2 September 1939, the Irish officially declared their neutrality! As a result, virtually the entire Second World War, some hundred miles from the British coast, in Dublin worked the diplomatic missions of Germany, Italy, and Japan. Along with the intelligence services of these countries.
Why does not Svanidze require repentance and punishment for Sweden? That's who exactly, according to the logic of Svanidze, is an ally of Hitler. After all, Sweden supplied the whole of World War II with iron ore. And often was the ONLY source of its receipt. The Swedes would not sell ore, the whole machine of Wehrmacht would have gotten back in 1939. Where are you, Nikolai Karlovich?
But Svanidze does not condemn anyone except the USSR, because the USSR and Stalin must be demonized, and the United States, Sweden and Ireland should not. That's all.
We are interested only in those documents that at least somehow can be pulled “behind the ears” and called “union”.
After August 1939, the USSR concluded with Germany ...
AGREEMENT ON FRIENDSHIP AND THE BORDER BETWEEN THE USSR AND GERMANY.
28 SEPTEMBER 1939
After the collapse of the former Polish state, the Government of the USSR and the German Government are viewed solely as their task to restore peace and order in this territory and to provide for the peoples living there a peaceful existence corresponding to their national characteristics. To this end, they agreed on the following:
1. The Government of the USSR and the German Government establish as a border between mutual state interests on the territory of the former Polish state, which is plotted on the attached map and will be described in more detail in the additional protocol.
2. Both Parties recognize the border established in Article 1, mutual state interests as final, and eliminate any interference by third powers in this decision.
3. The necessary government reorganization in the territory to the west of the line indicated in the article is made by the German Government, in the territory to the east of this line - by the Government of the USSR.
4. The Government of the USSR and the German Government regard the above-mentioned reorganization as a reliable foundation for the further development of friendly relations between their peoples.
5. This treaty is subject to ratification. The exchange of instruments of ratification should take place as soon as possible in Berlin. The contract comes into force from the moment of its signing. Compiled in two originals, in German and Russian.
Mr. Svanidze, please show the article, which is written about the Union between the two countries?
We have a clear desire to carry out forgery - to issue a non-aggression agreement or a border for a UNION agreement. To blacken the Soviet Union, Stalin personally and to launch the process of changing public consciousness on the principle of "Overton Window".
In fact, those myths and lies that Svanidze and his ilk are trying to “squeeze” into the public consciousness are not new. In 1947, the United States launched the first information war against the USSR using precisely these terms. And the very first attack was ... in 1940.
And he broke the myths and lies that are spread today by Svanidze - V. M. Molotov, Commissar for Foreign Affairs. Broke back in February 1940.
21 February 1940, the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs Molotov, sends an indication to the USSR Ambassador to England, May. Its text is written very clearly. Reading it, you catch yourself thinking that they wrote it not only for English diplomats, but also for modern “independent” journalists and “honest” historians. After all, to create the necessary public opinion inside Britain and France, the Soviet Union in the “free press” stubbornly called and represented an ally of Berlin.
“1). We consider it ridiculous and offensive to us not only a statement, but even just the assumption that the USSR supposedly entered into a military alliance with Germany;
2) the economic agreement with Germany is only an agreement on trade, according to which export from the USSR to Germany reaches only 500 million marks, and the agreement is economically beneficial to the USSR, since the USSR receives a large number of machines and equipment from Germany, as well as a fair amount of weapons , the sale of which, as is known, was denied to us both in England and in France;
3) as the USSR was neutral, so it will remain neutral, unless, of course, Britain and France attack the USSR and force them to take up weapon.
Persistently spreading rumors about a military alliance between the USSR and Germany are being heated not only by certain elements in Germany itself to pacify England and France, but also by some agents of England and France themselves who wish to use the supposed “transition of the USSR to Germany’s camp” for their specific purposes in the field of internal politicians". / Source: O. Rzheshevsky, Stalin and Churchill, M, Eksmo, 2010, C.6
In conclusion, a small lesson in “logic from Svanidze”.
Svanidze against Stalin and the Stalinist USSR. Germany was against Stalin and the Stalinist USSR.
Germany led the information war as part of a general war against the USSR and Stalin. Svanidze leads the information war against the USSR and Stalin.
Hitler's Germany and Svanidze have the same enemies. With whom they fought (fight) in the information field.
So - Svanidze and Germany are allies in the information war against the USSR and Stalin.
Svanidze is an ally of Germany.
PS On April 24, 2014, the website of the State Committee for Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine published methodological material on the celebration of Victory Day. (http://comin.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=112237&cat_id=77135).
Nikolai Karlovich Svanidze can be very pleased. This coaching for the celebration of the Victory in Ukraine was written by his associates.
Here and "the USSR - an ally of the Third Reich", and a red poppy instead of the St. George ribbon. And the focus is not on 9, but on 8, May. Here is the “Putin regime”, by the way.
What can I say? The work of dividing our great Russian people, consisting of Great Russians, Little Russians and Belarusians, is continuing. And “Svanidze” makes their own contribution to this work ...
Information