Journalist and blogger Maxim Oboltusov on his Facebook analyzed the explanations of the US position, which are posted on the website of the American Embassy in Moscow, on events in Ukraine.
Recall, the US Embassy in Russia the other day published an explanation of the situation in Ukraine, in which it assures that the Agreement concluded between Viktor Yanukovych and the February 21 opposition, was the first to violate Yanukovych. “Within the framework of this agreement, the Rada adopted a law on the return of Ukraine to the Constitution of 2004 of the year. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, Yanukovych had 24 hours to sign this law, after which the protesters had to release a number of government buildings and take other steps to reduce tensions.
Instead of signing, Yanukovych left Kiev and disappeared. It was Yanukovych who failed to comply with the February 21 agreement. The party of Yanukovych also went further, voting for the law to remove him from office and approving the new government. The US Permanent Representative to the UN Power said: “It was Yanukovych who violated the terms of this agreement, having left Kiev, and then Ukraine,” the US embassy said.
Oboltusov step by step analyzed the arguments of the US Embassy and tried to prove that the opposition was the first to violate the terms of the Agreement. We present his arguments without changing their style and vocabulary.
“No, well, this is just some kind of panopticon! Quite a few thinking people put on their pages a“ masterpiece ”from the“ giants ”of legal thought from the State Department, published on the official website of the US Embassy in Russia.
No, I certainly understand that not all people have the time to meticulously understand these intricacies, but how can you take this absurdity seriously?
As I understand it, “this” should be a possible official position of the State Department in support of the Junta. Sorry. And the State Department and the junta. But the truth is more expensive, so I propose to remember. And any news feed will help us in this. For greater persuasiveness, without further ado, we can directly take their own "drain bachOk" - Ukr Pravda, because the facts are facts everywhere, albeit with "racially correct" headlines.
Let's start by simply reading the text of this agreement carefully, point by point. And now - remember the chronology of the events of February 21:
Rybak did not have time in 10: 12 to sign a decree on a cease-fire and the withdrawal of all troops to their places of permanent deployment:
As already in 10: 20 The first requirement from Yatsenyuk appears: The release of Tymoshenko. Rybak, having received such an unexpected “introductory”, wanted to announce a break to discuss actions, but the signatories of the “peace agreement” staged a fight right in parliament. And after he decided not to announce a break, a second surprise had already appeared: the demand for his and Kaletnik's immediate resignation. True while from Lyashka. It was in 10: 38.
Especially hotheads from the PR, who understand that they are simply throwing them, are even called to the parliament building of explosives with machine guns. Again - time 10: 48.
But then, someone very clever (I am ready to kiss this earth, bowing to him on the floor), realizing that there is already a war in the street, and the only important goal now is to deprive the radicals of the opportunity to fight, convinced the parliamentary majority just to vote any " new requirements-initiatives "from the" honest "signatories of the Agreement unanimously, just to not give the Sponsors of the war the opportunity to thwart the signing of this fragile saving World, under which the European Observers had to sign.
We understand why it was Germany, France, Poland and Russia that did the Weimar trio to achieve Peace. Why didn't the United States and Great Britain stand for Peace? Understand or not? I just note an important fact for understanding what was happening then - as of 13: 44 - according to Sikorsky, this Agreement has not been signed yet:
What happened behind the walls of BP? The euroministers went to “roll out” the Rada of Maidan (at least some constructive body that can be referenced), clearly explaining the prospects for not signing the Agreement (fixing the time - 15: 10).
What at this time declared those who played on the side of the War? Everything is stupid to stupidity. The curators of Yarosh did not bother much: the Right Sector stated that the Agreement with Yanukovych is “fraud”, the Revolution continues, only the resignation of the “pseudo-president” demanded the arrest of ministers, commanders of the Berkut, the ban of the Party of Regions and the Communist Party, in short, read for yourself. Control time - 15: 27.
And finally, in 15: 56 - We have a precious document that saved us all from the REAL civil war, so necessary for its sponsors here. From that moment, according to the Agreement, 48 hours should be counted, that is, to 16: 00, 23.02.2014.
But only the tasks of the group called Junta today were completely different, which is why new requirements continued to appear every ten minutes ... For example, write a separate item in the special law on returning to the Constitution of 2004 for the year to secure the authority of the current Verkhovna Rada right up to 2017 year ...
But no matter what, on 16: 53 this law was voted on by 386 with votes. How continued the parliamentary majority will be fulfilled and the remaining paragraphs of the Agreement. Already in 17: 02 - 372, voices for amnesty for all Maidan activists, and amnestied everyone and everything, even those for whom any case may be opened (unprecedented case).
Further more. The future Junta demanded the dismissal of the Minister of the Interior, and already in 18: 12, despite the legitimate argument that it is not within the competence of BP, with a legally absurd wording (and who cares about it at all in the Junta), this bill was voted on. Before Rybak closed the meeting in 19: 00 had time to vote and the release of Tymoshenko and the allocation of assistance to victims on the Maidan. And he closed the meeting at all - under the chant about the resignation of the Prosecutor General. All right, as the Agreement was set forth, right?
So, the troops withdrawn, the law voted. It seems to be the 24 hours to pass weapon and release adminzdaniya? As written in the Agreement, right? So what is the text written in the same embassy Yarosh? Yes, everything is stupid and simple as always - “Those agreements that have been reached do not correspond to our aspirations.” The Right Sector will not lay down its arms. The Right Sector will not lift the blockade of any of the state institutions until our most important thing is fulfilled. requirement - the resignation of Yanukovych. " Well, again, the arrests of the commanders of the Golden Eagle and the rest of the "constructive". That is a clear message from the Maidan scene. No Peace. Only War, only hardcore. Yarosh he is such Yarosh. Nyashka.
We read, we remember the evening of the 21 number: Yanukovych is taken to Kharkov the same evening. Where Yarosh because of the absence in Kiev of the second side for bloodshed, the soldiers of the Right Sector were sent in full maidan ammunition. Yanukovych was not allowed to the congress, because any thinking person understood that now the only formality on the path to legitimize Junta is his life. After all, it is clear to everyone today, right? The congress was condemned, all the separatists were nipped in tongues, explaining that ANY radicalization plays into the hands of the losing sponsors of the Civil War.
At night, Yarosh was clearly reminded that he forgot an important piece of text, and at four in the morning he wrote on Facebook again about the ban on the Party of Regions and the Communist Party.
On the morning of 22, at the opening of the session, Koshulinsky read out Fisherman’s and Kaletnik’s statements about the resignation of communications in connection !!! with a disease. We remember well and know that in the case of the death of the President his duties are performed by the speaker, right? So - already in 12: 30 BP votes for their resignation and election of the new speaker Turchinov:
But then - the most interesting and funny. The junta went peddling. Already in 13: 03 - some act written on the knee is voted, which bypassing the President enacts the Constitution 2004. Be sure to read this "masterpiece". At least to laugh. Obviously was written by drop-in-lawyers at the same embassy. Quote: "during 48 hours, the draft law on the renewal of the Constitution should have been voted, signed and promulgated. This means that Yanukovych was obliged to sign this bill yesterday" Logically? This is it.
We already know for sure that since the signing of the Agreement, the entire 21 hour has passed, and the following requirements have already been put forward and implemented by direct blackmail with bloodshed on the streets:
- Timoshenko released
- Powers of BP extended to 2017 year
- Minister of Internal Affairs dismissed
- Changed Speaker BP with Deputy
Well, in addition - the hunt for Yanukovych is open, many are blackmailed by relatives, beaten ... All these undoubtedly interesting details of the formation of the Junta, we will definitely find out later, but for now let us return to the chronology of events. Rada instructs Turchinov "coordinate the work" of the Cabinet. Like this? We have, if anyone does not know the three branches of government. Independent. With a frightened legislative can control the executive? .. Ah, dreamers.
"Considering the actual self-elimination of many heads of state authorities from fulfilling their powers" - what self-elimination? Time - 13: 23. Formally, just 21 an hour ago, the President signed the Peace Agreement, and is now in Kharkiv, calming the separatists ... Read this “masterpiece” as well. Hardly ever will see such "lawmaking"
The ambassador from this very embassy hurried to somehow legalize all this nonsense already in 15: 30 with greetings to the new speaker. And now for the second time attention: in 16: 17, after just 24 hours after the signing of the Agreement - we formally have a statement by the president that there is no resignation, that his car was shot, and !!! appeal to euro mediators to intervene. Because “Today deputies are beaten, stoned and intimidated at the exit of the parliament. The decisions that are now being taken (in the Rada) are all illegal.”
But at the same time, we remember that there is still a day to sign the Constitution of 2004, and it is still possible to return to the Agreement, having canceled everything that had been “nakonakonorit”. It would be the desire of the signatories. But what does the junta do in return? Already in 17: 12 - Yanukovych’s removal from the post of President of Ukraine is being voted on. And elections are scheduled for 25 May 2014. Exactly as in the Agreement, yes?
But there are still as many 23 hours to think again))) But wherever. The junta is one solid joke. Are there really serious people (except specially gifted employees of the US embassy) who believe that all this can be legally true and legal? We will continue in brief, in 17: 31 BP invented some kind of institution authorized to monitor the Security Service of Ukraine, the GPU, and the Ministry of Defense. A little earlier (we missed), she was still banned by the Prosecutor General.
And already in 19: 30, Yatsenyuk, having thought hard, issued: "according to the Constitution, now the duties of the head of state are performed by Oleksandr Turchinov". Krasava. Kindergarten. “If there is no president” is undoubtedly legally correct. Well, the curators of this idiocy in the White House !!! hurried to bless Junta. The next day, everything went wrong: they voted for the resignation of ministers in turn: Bogatyrev, Kozhara, Tabachnik ...
But what is important to us in the search for Truth: In 12: 38 Turchinov was elected Acting. the president. Let me remind you that before the expiration of 48 hours, according to the Agreement, 3,5 hours still remained. I am separately just happy with the term "elected." Elected "President". What is it like?!? In our parliament now they choose? Or choose io only? Well, then, to the heap, the language law of Kolesnichenko was abolished. And this is already similar to the initiative from the Natsik. As the first Lenin in Kiev. The curator at the embassy will not pat it. Here Turchinov and "not signed" later.
Here, in general, and all the events that occurred during those same 48 hours, allotted in the Agreement, the first item on the adoption of a single law on the return to the Constitution 2004 of the year. After that, according to paragraph 5, 24 hours were assigned for the surrender of weapons and the release of administrative buildings.
After that, there were a lot more "cheerful initiatives" from Junta, but this is not what interests us in our "Truth Detector", is it? While writing this chronopus (on the instructions of Darling, by the way) - finally sensible and finally appeared news. The State Department again gave the back and this “pseudo-legal analysis” will remain, apparently, to roll on the pages of Facebook users who repost it.
Hunt is the end. She stillborn. Was it really incomprehensible when Bulatov was appointed minister? Well, tell me, friends, do you really seriously? In the same place the key was in the very first sentence, well, how can you not notice? I quote (from the website of the US Embassy in Russia !!!):
"Statement: The opposition violated the agreement concluded with Yanukovych February 21.
Answer: Within the framework of this agreement, the Rada adopted a law on the return of Ukraine to the Constitution of 2004. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, Yanukovych had 24 hours to sign this law, after which the protesters had to release a number of government buildings and take other steps to reduce tensions. Instead of signing, Yanukovych left Kiev and disappeared. It was Yanukovych who failed to comply with the February 21 agreement. Yanukovych’s party also went further, voting for the law to remove him from office and approving the new government. ”
Did you read? Again!!! "In accordance with the terms of the agreement, Yanukovych had 24 hours to sign this law." Again!!! 24 hours. I am silent about the legal wording "disappeared" ... Questions remained? And finally, I will finish you.
With love and respect, but still. According to the Constitution of Ukraine: "The draft law on amending the Constitution of Ukraine, previously approved by a majority of the constitutional composition of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, is considered adopted if at least two thirds of the constitutional composition of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine voted for it at the next regular session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine."
Taking into account the fact that the current session of the parliament began in February, in the case of consideration of the bill at this session, it can be adopted no earlier than September 2 of the 2014 year, that is, when the second session of the parliament begins. Otherwise, changes to the constitution can simply not be accepted. They can not, and that's it. If we completely get rid of the coils and decide to simply abolish the entire Constitution, we will still have to vote in TWO sessions. This is a fuse like that. Democratic. From the junta all. So that the Basic Law cannot be changed at the point of the automata ...
Are we still a European country or a banana republic?
Important PS I hope we all carefully watched one conversation and press conference in order to understand that Yanukovych will forever remain an instructive example of the "rat logic of life" and there will be no President at all. "