Impact of a possible global geophysical catastrophe on the military-political situation in the world
It is clear that those behind the visible political figures, the real owners of the Western project, the so-called “financial international”, are well aware of what is happening. They have entire institutions, analytical centers, where the planning of events for years, decades.
Therefore, geoclimatic changes for the “think tanks” of the West are not a secret. Apparently, they decided to solve two problems simultaneously:
- survive yourself;
- and “lower” the rest of the world into a state of “controlled chaos”, reducing to a maximum the number of future refugees.
At present, several regional centers of power have appeared in Asia: the PRC (it can also claim the role of a global leader), India, South Korea, Iran, Libya, and Turkey. Pakistan, Syria, Egypt claim the role of regional powers. Already "lowered" Iraq (Saddam Hussein was one of the leaders of the Arab world), lower Libya, under the blow of Syria, Pakistan.
At present, Asian leaders are losing the “undeclared war to the Western project. But, in order to keep Asia in the future, the West needs to militarize Europe, drastically reduce consumption, tighten laws, and finally turn NATO into a strike offensive mechanism from a defensive mechanism. That is why in the strike against Libya, Washington is initially trying to be on the sidelines, the Europeans should be allowed to feel the "taste of blood." Libya is a testing ground for running into combat cooperation of European countries in order to skillfully suppress the "uprising" of any country. In addition, the Southern Mediterranean will be a zone of resettlement of refugees from Europe, here should be obedient leaders, and not “hairy” like Gaddafi.
An interesting aspect: the wars of the South and the North, the West “burrowed the grave” to itself, pushing the USSR to collapse. The USSR was the most powerful stabilizing factor of the entire planet. Under him, a global war would not have begun, the USSR could restrain the aggressive aspirations of the Western countries and at the same time gave the Third World countries the opportunity for independent development.
The USA and Europe now need Russia, its energy resources, military forces to survive and win. Accordingly, Asian countries also need Russia, if not as an ally, then as a territory with the resources necessary for survival. Therefore, the Russian Federation so hard to drag in Afghanistan, offered to take part in the aggression against Libya.
The bosses of the West did not wait for the climate change to become clear to everyone and the movement of huge masses of people would begin, and they themselves launched "headfire". They set fire to the Arab world, before that they tried in vain to set fire to the Korean Peninsula, to push India and Pakistan (terrorist acts of "Islamic" terrorists in India), to push Israel to strike Iran. With the Arab countries, everything turned out just "excellent."
Why is Libya chosen?
Gaddafi actually became the informal leader of the "resistance." Libya is the vanguard of the Asiatic world against the post-Christian West, Gaddafi himself announced that this is a clash of civilizations, Putin confirmed this in Russia.
The mills of the West have shown with a sharp response that the "rebellion" will be suppressed, they are the "owners of the planet." And appeals to the West that peaceful people are dying are ridiculous - the more they die, the less they will have to be “disposed of”. Libya is very convenient and as the first opponent of Europe: the Europeans have lost morale, the first enemy must be weak so that he cannot “give in the teeth”, by the next Air Force and European Navy will be more experienced, with an increased fighting spirit.
Plus, there are other tasks: oil, uranium, water, the draft gold standard, undermining the position of the dollar and the euro. Clearing the field for future European migrants in the light of the coming cooling and resettlement of Europeans to the south.
Apparently, this was one of the reasons for joining a neutral Sweden to the operation, Scandinavia would be practically unsuitable for life.
Who's next?
Three candidates: Syria, Iran and Turkey, as the most powerful regional powers that can lead the "campaign of Asia" against the West. Ankara seems to be like a member of NATO, but lately it has been pursuing a too independent policy, working on the Ottoman Empire-2 project.
Turkey is being "substituted" in the project plan for the creation of an "independent Kurdistan". The Kurds, according to the plan of Washington and London, should become a “lightning rod”, one already is - Israel, we need a second - Kurdistan. This project will cause hatred of Iran, Turkey, Syria. The Kurds can finance themselves and buy weapons at the expense of oil fields.
Perhaps Kurdistan is needed as a replacement for Israel, there is the possibility of a “complete surrender” of Israel. Israel will not surrender without a fight, the losses will be terrible, given the huge arsenals of the Israeli armed forces. The option of a complete victory of Israel (the project “Great Israel”) and the total destruction of their opponents is unlikely, although it is not excluded. Too many of his enemies, if the Arabs are incapable, that is, Iran is still, and Ankara will not stay away. In addition, in the context of global climatic and tectonic shifts (2010-2011 years - were the first "flowers") Israel can be cut off from international supply channels weapons and ammunition.
Fundamental changes in NATO:
The new strategy of NATO is aimed at covering the entire planet; the interpretation of the main article No. 5 of the military bloc, which defines the conditions for the use of military force, has been significantly expanded. The reasons for the war can be:
- “cyber attacks”, that is, now there is no need to spend money on the organization of serious provocations and events such as Pearl Harbor or 11 of September, we can restrict ourselves to an attack by hackers.
““ ... Illegal disruption of the functioning of critical supply routes ... ”, that is, if the Russian Federation blocks the gas pipeline to non-payers, it can be bombed legally. At this point, you can see and the threat to our Northern Sea Route.
- “Provocative statements”, “political blackmail”, support for “terrorism”, in the end, it turns out that you can legally bomb almost the entire Middle and Near East, especially Iran. For "provocative statements" can "pull up" and Hugo Chávez.
- Ignoring the countries of "global" rules and regulations, that is, it seems, the "bad behavior" of states. That is, countries will not be able to develop nuclear energy (like Iran and Syria), push up the separatist uprising on their territory without "high resolution".
- "... Challenges that do not directly affect the security of the alliance, but ... are important for citizens of NATO countries ..." Apparently, if any country (Russia again) wants to return the resources of their homeland under the control of their people from the control of transnational corporations, then NATO will come and punish the bad guys.
Geoclimatic changes are not the only reason that so intensified the aggressiveness of the Western project.
In the context of the global financial, economic and social crisis There are two main ways to solve problems:
1. Go, on the model of the USSR, the Third Reich, to regulate the economy, abandon market-liberal principles, limit the consumption of the rich, more equitably redistribute resources.
2. Provide an inflow of additional resources to your economy, that is, automatically “rob a neighbor”. But this system is flawed, as soon as the growth of economies ceases, that is, the inflow of additional resources, the collapse is inevitable. This is not only a Western model, but also a modern PRC.
NATO is becoming a tool for maintaining the “metropolis-colony” system; in the conditions of growing independence of Asian countries, only by force can the parasitic system be maintained.
Russia
The Russian Federation is in a very difficult situation, we are not currently dragging on the role of a third force. To do this, you need to create the Russian Union: the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Belarus, Transnistria, possibly Kazakhstan and Armenia. This is the only way to start your Big Game.
Key recommendations:
- Do not go on a strategic alliance with the West (you can separately consolidate only with Germany), or with China, otherwise we automatically become the enemy of Asia or the West, and we will be "crushed" in full.
- Maintain a neutral position.
- To arm and restore strong air defense-missile defense, air force, navy, it is necessary to achieve population growth at the expense of indigenous peoples.
- To restore agriculture, we can supply the countries of Asia with food.
Therefore, geoclimatic changes for the “think tanks” of the West are not a secret. Apparently, they decided to solve two problems simultaneously:
- survive yourself;
- and “lower” the rest of the world into a state of “controlled chaos”, reducing to a maximum the number of future refugees.
At present, several regional centers of power have appeared in Asia: the PRC (it can also claim the role of a global leader), India, South Korea, Iran, Libya, and Turkey. Pakistan, Syria, Egypt claim the role of regional powers. Already "lowered" Iraq (Saddam Hussein was one of the leaders of the Arab world), lower Libya, under the blow of Syria, Pakistan.
At present, Asian leaders are losing the “undeclared war to the Western project. But, in order to keep Asia in the future, the West needs to militarize Europe, drastically reduce consumption, tighten laws, and finally turn NATO into a strike offensive mechanism from a defensive mechanism. That is why in the strike against Libya, Washington is initially trying to be on the sidelines, the Europeans should be allowed to feel the "taste of blood." Libya is a testing ground for running into combat cooperation of European countries in order to skillfully suppress the "uprising" of any country. In addition, the Southern Mediterranean will be a zone of resettlement of refugees from Europe, here should be obedient leaders, and not “hairy” like Gaddafi.
An interesting aspect: the wars of the South and the North, the West “burrowed the grave” to itself, pushing the USSR to collapse. The USSR was the most powerful stabilizing factor of the entire planet. Under him, a global war would not have begun, the USSR could restrain the aggressive aspirations of the Western countries and at the same time gave the Third World countries the opportunity for independent development.
The USA and Europe now need Russia, its energy resources, military forces to survive and win. Accordingly, Asian countries also need Russia, if not as an ally, then as a territory with the resources necessary for survival. Therefore, the Russian Federation so hard to drag in Afghanistan, offered to take part in the aggression against Libya.
The bosses of the West did not wait for the climate change to become clear to everyone and the movement of huge masses of people would begin, and they themselves launched "headfire". They set fire to the Arab world, before that they tried in vain to set fire to the Korean Peninsula, to push India and Pakistan (terrorist acts of "Islamic" terrorists in India), to push Israel to strike Iran. With the Arab countries, everything turned out just "excellent."
Why is Libya chosen?
Gaddafi actually became the informal leader of the "resistance." Libya is the vanguard of the Asiatic world against the post-Christian West, Gaddafi himself announced that this is a clash of civilizations, Putin confirmed this in Russia.
The mills of the West have shown with a sharp response that the "rebellion" will be suppressed, they are the "owners of the planet." And appeals to the West that peaceful people are dying are ridiculous - the more they die, the less they will have to be “disposed of”. Libya is very convenient and as the first opponent of Europe: the Europeans have lost morale, the first enemy must be weak so that he cannot “give in the teeth”, by the next Air Force and European Navy will be more experienced, with an increased fighting spirit.
Plus, there are other tasks: oil, uranium, water, the draft gold standard, undermining the position of the dollar and the euro. Clearing the field for future European migrants in the light of the coming cooling and resettlement of Europeans to the south.
Apparently, this was one of the reasons for joining a neutral Sweden to the operation, Scandinavia would be practically unsuitable for life.
Who's next?
Three candidates: Syria, Iran and Turkey, as the most powerful regional powers that can lead the "campaign of Asia" against the West. Ankara seems to be like a member of NATO, but lately it has been pursuing a too independent policy, working on the Ottoman Empire-2 project.
Turkey is being "substituted" in the project plan for the creation of an "independent Kurdistan". The Kurds, according to the plan of Washington and London, should become a “lightning rod”, one already is - Israel, we need a second - Kurdistan. This project will cause hatred of Iran, Turkey, Syria. The Kurds can finance themselves and buy weapons at the expense of oil fields.
Perhaps Kurdistan is needed as a replacement for Israel, there is the possibility of a “complete surrender” of Israel. Israel will not surrender without a fight, the losses will be terrible, given the huge arsenals of the Israeli armed forces. The option of a complete victory of Israel (the project “Great Israel”) and the total destruction of their opponents is unlikely, although it is not excluded. Too many of his enemies, if the Arabs are incapable, that is, Iran is still, and Ankara will not stay away. In addition, in the context of global climatic and tectonic shifts (2010-2011 years - were the first "flowers") Israel can be cut off from international supply channels weapons and ammunition.
Fundamental changes in NATO:
The new strategy of NATO is aimed at covering the entire planet; the interpretation of the main article No. 5 of the military bloc, which defines the conditions for the use of military force, has been significantly expanded. The reasons for the war can be:
- “cyber attacks”, that is, now there is no need to spend money on the organization of serious provocations and events such as Pearl Harbor or 11 of September, we can restrict ourselves to an attack by hackers.
““ ... Illegal disruption of the functioning of critical supply routes ... ”, that is, if the Russian Federation blocks the gas pipeline to non-payers, it can be bombed legally. At this point, you can see and the threat to our Northern Sea Route.
- “Provocative statements”, “political blackmail”, support for “terrorism”, in the end, it turns out that you can legally bomb almost the entire Middle and Near East, especially Iran. For "provocative statements" can "pull up" and Hugo Chávez.
- Ignoring the countries of "global" rules and regulations, that is, it seems, the "bad behavior" of states. That is, countries will not be able to develop nuclear energy (like Iran and Syria), push up the separatist uprising on their territory without "high resolution".
- "... Challenges that do not directly affect the security of the alliance, but ... are important for citizens of NATO countries ..." Apparently, if any country (Russia again) wants to return the resources of their homeland under the control of their people from the control of transnational corporations, then NATO will come and punish the bad guys.
Geoclimatic changes are not the only reason that so intensified the aggressiveness of the Western project.
In the context of the global financial, economic and social crisis There are two main ways to solve problems:
1. Go, on the model of the USSR, the Third Reich, to regulate the economy, abandon market-liberal principles, limit the consumption of the rich, more equitably redistribute resources.
2. Provide an inflow of additional resources to your economy, that is, automatically “rob a neighbor”. But this system is flawed, as soon as the growth of economies ceases, that is, the inflow of additional resources, the collapse is inevitable. This is not only a Western model, but also a modern PRC.
NATO is becoming a tool for maintaining the “metropolis-colony” system; in the conditions of growing independence of Asian countries, only by force can the parasitic system be maintained.
Russia
The Russian Federation is in a very difficult situation, we are not currently dragging on the role of a third force. To do this, you need to create the Russian Union: the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Belarus, Transnistria, possibly Kazakhstan and Armenia. This is the only way to start your Big Game.
Key recommendations:
- Do not go on a strategic alliance with the West (you can separately consolidate only with Germany), or with China, otherwise we automatically become the enemy of Asia or the West, and we will be "crushed" in full.
- Maintain a neutral position.
- To arm and restore strong air defense-missile defense, air force, navy, it is necessary to achieve population growth at the expense of indigenous peoples.
- To restore agriculture, we can supply the countries of Asia with food.
Information