Military Review

The United States has concentrated in the Pacific submarines with nuclear weapons to deter Russia, China and North Korea

57
The United States has concentrated in the Pacific submarines with nuclear weapons to deter Russia, China and North Korea"More than 60 percent of US submarines with atomic weapons concentrated in the Pacific Ocean, fulfilling the tasks of nuclear containment of Russia, China and North Korea. At the same time, at any time, 4-5 submarines are ready to launch a nuclear strike immediately, " report "US Nuclear Forces, 2014"published in the journal Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.


The document, prepared by two well-known American experts Hans Christenson and Robert Norris, notes that at the moment the United States has about 7400 of various types of atomic warheads. Of these, 2700 are preparing for destruction, according to international agreements, 2530 are in storage, and 2120 are in service. Of the latter, 1152 warheads are deployed on intercontinental missiles on submarines, 470 - on land-based ballistic missiles, 300 - on bomber and less than 200 are tactical nuclear warheads.

As the report shows, the United States, in its strategy of nuclear deterrence, relies primarily on nuclear-powered submarines. At the same time, nuclear-powered submarines "in more than 60% of cases conduct patrol activities in the Pacific region." "This is done in order to launch a nuclear war, if necessary, or to launch retaliatory strikes against China, North Korea or the eastern part of Russia," the document says.

A total of 12 submarines with nuclear weapons are on board for combat patrols. Of these, 8-9 submarines are constantly in strategic areas. At the same time 4-5 submarines, as noted in the report "US Nuclear Forces, 2014", are in a state of constant combat readiness in order to immediately strike at pre-selected targets.

The document also states that, on average, each US Navy submarine with nuclear weapons conducts military patrols per year for 2-3. Each such trip lasts an average of 70 days, but in some cases the duration increases to 100 or more days.

Scientists recognize that recently, in connection with the international agreements concluded, the United States began to reduce its patrol activity with forces capable of carrying nuclear weapons, but the Barack Obama government intends to spend around 30 billions of dollars in 200 years to modernize its atomic arsenals. Experts warn that nuclear weapons in the world constantly threaten all life on Earth, as they can provoke an atomic conflict due to some tragic mistake.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.rg.ru/2014/01/13/podlodki-site-anons.html
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Romn
    Romn 16 January 2014 07: 13
    +5
    No one will tell you how many of our submarines are on combat patrol? It’s just that we seem to focus on the submarine fleet, and as I know (maybe mistakenly, it seems they wrote on the site), we have 1-2 submarines with poison. weapons at the same time doing combat duty in the ocean ?!
    1. avant-garde
      avant-garde 16 January 2014 07: 26
      +9
      Quote: Romn
      No one will tell you how many of our submarines are on combat patrol?

      Who will give you such information ??? The boat on alert is in radio silence mode, communicating only from certain squares at a certain time, and you want to know their number!
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 16 January 2014 07: 28
        +2
        Quote: avant-garde
        , and you want to know their number

        The main thing is that they are!
        1. domokl
          domokl 16 January 2014 07: 32
          +1
          Quote: tronin.maxim
          The main thing is that they are!

          I won’t argue here. But all the same, TF is more surface on Russia. The ocean fleet. And this allows you to control (plus our planes) these submarines almost completely.
          For a nuclear strike from a boat, surprise and secrecy are important .. And this is just not ..
        2. Sirocco
          Sirocco 16 January 2014 09: 24
          0
          Quote: tronin.maxim
          The main thing is that they are!

          The main thing is that the captains of these nuclear submarines do not use drugs, as some officers of the US Army over which the scandal erupted,
          Three of them were on alert at the Malmstrom bases in Montana and Minot in North Dakota, where the Minutemen were stationed with nuclear warheads.
          Otherwise, we will not see good luck.
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 16 January 2014 07: 29
      +1
      Quote: Romn
      No one will tell you how many of our submarines are on combat patrol?

      NONE! Infa vulture, who puts it, he will sit down winked
    3. Civil
      Civil 16 January 2014 07: 36
      +2
      Well, at the expense of the DPRK, they made fun of holding back a barely living country with nuclear missile carriers ...
      1. domokl
        domokl 16 January 2014 07: 42
        0
        Quote: Civil
        , restrain a barely living country with nuclear missile carriers ..

        Well, don’t tell me. The task is not to restrain the country, but to intimidate ... The Japanese can’t be bullied both against the PRC and the DPRK. So, if the Chinese wanted to spit on the American fist, keep it at the nose of the Koreans ... What any help to the allies) ))))
        1. Gluxar_
          Gluxar_ 16 January 2014 13: 18
          +1
          Quote: domokl
          Well, don’t tell me. The task is not to restrain the country, but to intimidate ... The Japanese can’t be bullied both against the PRC and the DPRK. So, if the Chinese wanted to spit on the American fist, keep it at the nose of the Koreans ... What any help to the allies) ))))

          Can the Japanese do anything today? Maybe then with Fukushima at least "can" start?
      2. Gluxar_
        Gluxar_ 16 January 2014 13: 16
        0
        Quote: Civil
        Well, at the expense of the DPRK, they made fun of holding back a barely living country with nuclear missile carriers ...

        Well, she is "barely alive" for the last half a century. Yes, that's just 5 years ago launched a satellite into space, before the Japanese. And they themselves created nuclear weapons.
        1. alone
          alone 16 January 2014 19: 30
          0
          Quote: Gluxar_
          Well, she is "barely alive" for the last half a century. Yes, that's just 5 years ago launched a satellite into space, before the Japanese. And they themselves created nuclear weapons.


          )) As for the ones they themselves created, it sounds illogical. Korea was helped by China, Let's talk objectively, Korea itself is not able to create such a thing.
    4. Scandinavian
      Scandinavian 16 January 2014 07: 41
      +1
      No one will tell you how many of our submarines are on combat patrol? It’s just that we seem to focus on the submarine fleet, and as I know (maybe mistakenly, it seems they wrote on the site), we have 1-2 submarines with poison. weapons at the same time doing combat duty in the ocean ?!


      Turn to a psychic, he will tell you for sure laughing
    5. Rurikovich
      Rurikovich 16 January 2014 07: 53
      +1
      Even standing at the pier counts for military patrols, although recently information about 5 combat exits for the entire fleet has slipped through the year.
    6. FREGATENKAPITAN
      FREGATENKAPITAN 16 January 2014 07: 54
      +1
      At the same time, at any time, 4-5 submarines are ready to launch a nuclear strike immediately..it will not be a big secret if I say that no less than the PKK SN are on patrol and on the database in the bases, we are also ready to launch a few minutes after receiving the signal ...........
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. predator.3
      predator.3 16 January 2014 08: 19
      0
      hell knows, so in the Pacific Fleet there are 2 RPKSN of project 667BDR Kalmar.
      And in which waters those assigned to the Northern Fleet "roam" only God knows.
      1. skiff-xnumx
        skiff-xnumx 17 January 2014 08: 25
        0
        And here you are a little mistaken as part of the Pacific Fleet, three project 667bdr boats and one Borey.
    9. Gluxar_
      Gluxar_ 16 January 2014 13: 14
      +1
      Quote: Romn
      No one will tell you how many of our submarines are on combat patrol? It’s just that we seem to focus on the submarine fleet, and as I know (maybe mistakenly, it seems they wrote on the site), we have 1-2 submarines with poison. weapons at the same time doing combat duty in the ocean ?!

      In 2012, the Americans counted only about 5-6 exits, but then the Shark scandal erupted off the coast of Florida. So no one can ever know exactly how much and where. This is also a military secret.
    10. Poppy
      Poppy 16 January 2014 15: 00
      +1
      rumor has it that not a single crying
      1. Ascetic
        Ascetic 16 January 2014 21: 44
        +2
        Quote: Poppy
        rumor has it that not a single


        The Russian Navy includes 13 nuclear submarines with ballistic missiles, 27 nuclear submarines with missile and torpedo weapons, 19 diesel submarines, 8 nuclear submarines for special purposes and 1 diesel submarine for special purposes.
        SSBN
        project 667BDR "Kalmar".
        K-44 "Ryazan" Pacific Fleet, Vilyuchinsk. The submarine is equipped with 4 mm and 533 mm torpedo tubes. Missile armament - 2 ballistic missile launchers of R-400R. Since 16 is under repair and modernization.
        K-223 "Podolsk" Pacific Fleet, Vilyuchinsk.
        equipped with 4 mm and 533 mm bow torpedo tubes. Ammunition - 2 torpedoes. Instead of part of the torpedoes, it is possible to install up to 400 minutes. Missile armament - 16 launchers of ballistic missiles R-24R. There are launchers for the Strela-16M portable anti-aircraft missile system.
        As of 2013, the 25th EscPL PLF is part of the 16th DiPL, and is based in Krasheninnikov Bay.

        К-433 "Saint George the Victorious"Pacific Fleet, Vilyuchinsk. Military equipment similar to Podolsk
        As of 2013, the nuclear submarine is part of the 25th DiPL Submarine Substation TOF.
        Project 667BDRM Dolphin
        K-51 "Verkhoturye" Northern Fleet, Gadzhievo.
        equipped with 4 bow torpedo tubes (533 mm). Ammunition - 12 torpedoes. Instead of part of the torpedoes, it is possible to install up to 24 minutes. Missile armament - 16 launchers of ballistic missiles R-29RM. There is a launcher for the 9K310 Igla-1 / 9K38 Igla portable anti-aircraft missile system.
        In combat


        To be continued
        1. Ascetic
          Ascetic 16 January 2014 21: 58
          0
          K-84 "Yekaterinburg"Northern Fleet, Gadzhievo.
          4 bow torpedo tubes 533 mm (ammunition - 12 torpedoes SAET-60M, 53-65M, PLUR RPK-6 "Waterfall"), instead of part of the torpedoes, it is possible to install up to 24 minutes.
          Missile: 16 R-29RM ballistic missiles.
          Anti-aircraft: 4-8 portable anti-aircraft missile systems 9K310 "Igla-1" / 9K38 "Igla"
          At the end of December 2011, during a repair work in the village of Roslyakovo, Murmansk Region, a fire occurred on a submarine, as a result of which nine people were injured, and the antenna of the sonar complex of the boat was damaged.
          The return of the boat into operation is scheduled for 2014.
          K-18 "Karelia" Northern Fleet, Gadzhievo.
          equipped with 4 bow torpedo tubes (533 mm). Ammunition - 12 torpedoes. Instead of part of the torpedoes, it is possible to install up to 24 minutes. Missile armament - RSM-54 "Sineva", torpedo-missile system TVR-671RTM. There is a launcher for the 9K310 Igla-1 / 9K38 Igla portable anti-aircraft missile system.
          As of 2012, the boat is part of the 31st DiPL Submarine Submarine SF and is based on Yagelnaya Bay (Gadzhievo).
          K-117 "Bryansk"Northern Fleet, Gadzhievo.
          equipped with 4 mm torpedo tubes. Missile armament - 533 launchers of ballistic missiles R-16 RMU29 "Sineva". On board there are launchers of the 2K9 Igla-310 / 1K9 Igla portable anti-aircraft missile system.
          In combat
          From May to July 2013 she completed the tasks of a long hike.
          K-407 "Novomoskovsk"Northern Fleet, Gadzhievo.
          equipped with 4 mm torpedo tubes. Missile armament - 533 launchers of ballistic missiles R-16RM. On board there are launchers of the 29K9 Igla-310 / 1K9 Igla portable anti-aircraft missile system.
          As of 2013, it is in the combat structure of the Russian Navy. (after upgrading on the Asterisk)
          K-114 "Tula" Northern Fleet, Gadzhievo.
          equipped with 4 mm torpedo tubes. Missile armament - 533 launchers of ballistic missiles R-16 RMU29 "Sineva". On board there are launchers of the 2K9 Igla-310 / 1K9 Igla portable anti-aircraft missile system.
          As of 2012, it was in the combat structure of the Northern Fleet
          1. Ascetic
            Ascetic 16 January 2014 22: 04
            +1
            project 09787.
            BS-64 "Moscow region" Northern Fleet.
            equipped with 4 bow torpedo tubes (533 mm). Ammunition - 12 torpedoes. Instead of part of the torpedoes, it is possible to install up to 24 minutes. Missile armament - 16 launchers of ballistic missiles R-29RM. There is a launcher of the 9K310 Igla-1 / 9K38 Igla portable anti-aircraft missile system
            It is being refurbished in shop No. 15 of the Zvezdochka CS. The date of completion of work on the conversion of the ship is unknown.
            Project 941 Shark
            TK-208 "Dmitry Donskoy" Western Faces, Northern Fleet.
            6 533 mm torpedo tubes
            22 torpedoes 53-65K, SET-65, SAET-60M, USET-80 and rocket-torpedoes "Waterfall"
            20 Bulava ballistic missiles
            8 Igla anti-aircraft missile systems
            As of 2013, he was in the combat structure of the Russian Navy based on Severodvinsk.

            TK-17 "Arkhangelsk" Northern Fleet.

            As of 2013, it was in reserve with its base in Severodvinsk.
            TC-20 "Severstal"Northern Fleet.

            As of 2013, it was in reserve based in Severodvinsk pending decommissioning.
            1. Ascetic
              Ascetic 16 January 2014 22: 15
              +1
              project 955 "Borey".
              "Yury Dolgoruky" Gadzhievo
              armed with torpedoes, torpedo missiles, cruise missiles. The nuclear submarine is equipped with 6 533 mm torpedo tubes, portable anti-aircraft missile systems. The project is to equip with 12 Bulava ballistic missiles.
              At the beginning of 2013, on January 10, a ceremony of raising the Navy flag was held on a submarine. Thus, the first new generation missile carrier was officially accepted into the Russian Navy.
              On September 6, 2013, the submarine arrived at its permanent home in Gadzhievo.

              "Alexander Nevskiy"
              As of 2013, a state testing program is underway.
              6 533 mm torpedo tubes, torpedoes, torpedo missiles, cruise missiles, 16 Bulava ICBMs, portable anti-aircraft missile systems.
              Vladimir Monomakh "
              As of 2013, it is undergoing state tests.
              6 533 mm torpedo tubes, torpedoes, torpedo missiles, cruise missiles, 16 Bulava ICBMs, portable anti-aircraft missile systems.
  2. ZU-23
    ZU-23 16 January 2014 07: 15
    0
    You try to catch Ash first, and then think about the Chinese and Juche.
    1. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim 16 January 2014 07: 24
      +5
      I don’t think it’s worth being scared of American nuclear submarines. They are well aware that at least one launch in our direction and themselves in half an hour will not be in the world. There are no winners in a nuclear war. Let's hope that the Americans have common sense!
      1. ZU-23
        ZU-23 16 January 2014 07: 35
        0
        Yes, of course, nobody needs a nuclear war, it's just that all these missiles are being made to land a potential enemy in the ass and begin to invade without strikes, like we could bomb you like that, but you want to live, but you have to live our own way. Although I read such conversations that Russia will attack with the first nuclear weapons, unless of course the Americans will achieve the best developments and begin to develop them.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. domokl
      domokl 16 January 2014 07: 29
      +5
      Quote: ZU-23
      You try first catch Ash

      laughing Ash ... stump
  3. domokl
    domokl 16 January 2014 07: 19
    +4
    Something smells like ... 12 boats in the Pacific Ocean and what? Why keep so much in the Atlantic? Not to mention the Indian and Arctic ... The Pacific has always been and will be the main one for the United States. And everyone understands this.
    The USSR always had a powerful fleet there. The truth was that we had good memory then, Pearl Harble was remembered, so the submarines were based where it was difficult to get them. And now, besides Russia, the Chinese have come into the game. So the Americans will have a lot of fun .. I don’t know as in Chinese you don’t shoot everyone, but ...
    It seems to me that the message is designed for the Chinese more than for Russia. They scare them. Well, the Japanese are also a little to strengthen morale ...
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 16 January 2014 07: 39
      +2
      Quote: domokl
      Something smells here ..

      Hydrocarbons in the Arctic and associated intimidation of China, with its growing ambitions in the Asia-Pacific region. Alexander, hi !
      1. domokl
        domokl 16 January 2014 07: 45
        +1
        Quote: Tersky
        and in the Arctic and the associated intimidation of China.

        Well, we won’t give up the Arctic ... Putin didn’t just say so ... Yes, and Americans are weak on their knees so far for raids under the ice .. laughing Categorically, Victor drinks
  4. makarov
    makarov 16 January 2014 07: 21
    0
    Or maybe they aimed in advance to spoil the Arctic ??
    1. invisibility
      invisibility 16 January 2014 07: 24
      0
      I would say shit everywhere! "The drums of war cannot be heard only by the deaf"
    2. domokl
      domokl 16 January 2014 07: 47
      +1
      Quote: makarov
      set out to crap in the Arctic ??

      The gut is thin there to spoil ... The maximum is at the White Sea .. Further on the ice, and their vaunted ones are not our submariners to be afraid of as hell
  5. stayer
    stayer 16 January 2014 07: 27
    +1
    Placing the largest possible number of charges on submarines only confirms that submarines remain the most invulnerable carriers.

    Only a quantitative imbalance is depressing. It is necessary to build new submarines. Yes, expensive, but necessary ...
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 16 January 2014 07: 32
      +1
      Quote: stayer
      Only quantitative imbalance is depressing

      And what imbalance, how many boats are now ready to hammer in the USA? We don’t know this, because of this about balance or imbalance, with a pitchfork on water.
      1. stayer
        stayer 16 January 2014 08: 12
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And what imbalance, how many boats are now ready to hammer in the USA? We don’t know this, because of this about balance or imbalance, with a pitchfork on water.

        Duck this info is not secret. Russia has 24 submarines capable of carrying long-range missiles. Of these, only 10 SSBNs, and there are no boats carrying more than 16 missiles.
        US 60 submarines, of which 18 are Ohio type, which carry 24 missiles.
        The average age of Russian submarines is more than 25 years. Here is such an imbalance ...
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 16 January 2014 08: 15
          +1
          Quote: stayer
          US 60 submarines, of which 18 are Ohio type, which carry 24 missiles.
          The average age of Russian submarines is more than 25 years.

          Now name the age of the missiles standing on American boats wink The trash of the 70s, will climb or not fly up. Fly or not fly 50/50. Here is such a balance.
          1. stayer
            stayer 16 January 2014 10: 39
            +1
            So you are trying to say that we do not need new submarines? Did I understand correctly?
            And to check whether it will fly 50/50 to check is also not worth it, it will not seem a little ...
          2. FREGATENKAPITAN
            FREGATENKAPITAN 16 January 2014 11: 21
            0
            *********** Absolutely true .... there can be no imbalance, this is all for unskilled laymen, If someone thinks that the number of Boats or missiles can be deployed at any given time, then he mistakenly deep, All this is stipulated by the SALT Agreements and has not yet been reviewed by any party
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. Onyx
            Onyx 16 January 2014 13: 27
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Now name the age of the missiles standing on American boats. The trash of the 70s, will climb or not fly up. Fly or not fly 50/50. Here is such a balance

            And you do not confuse Trident-2 missiles, which are on Amer’s submarines, which only began to be produced in the early 90s with Minitman-3 mine rockets of really 70s production? Well, and so, even though most of our SSBNs are older than the US, the rockets on them are very fresh - Sineva.
    2. domokl
      domokl 16 January 2014 07: 36
      +1
      Quote: stayer
      Only a quantitative imbalance is depressing. It is necessary to build new submarines.

      I don’t agree. The quality, or rather, the quality is much more important. Old boats are no longer dangerous and will be destroyed in a short time. The appearance of any innovation in this area automatically leads to the development of counter-weapons. And taking into account the time of construction of the boat and the time of its operation, the development of counter-weapons is always more successful ...
  6. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 16 January 2014 07: 32
    +1
    Or maybe one submarine is enough for mess of the world, you’ll release one or two rackets, but how many will split ... and put love there will be no one.
    1. Yuri Y.
      Yuri Y. 16 January 2014 07: 46
      0
      In this regard, the words of GDP are recalled. You, said, will kill us 10 times, well, we will kill you 2 times. In general, enough for everyone.
    2. FREGATENKAPITAN
      FREGATENKAPITAN 16 January 2014 11: 25
      +1
      Quite right, in the tactical manual for the nuclear submarines it is written that one project 667 B boat (in this case only 12 monoblocks) withdraws from the war a Central European country - Germany, France, etc. Displays ....those. completely destroys!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  7. major071
    major071 16 January 2014 07: 37
    +4
    I hope that ours knows the patrol areas of American submarines and carefully monitors them.
    1. SibRUS
      SibRUS 16 January 2014 08: 12
      0
      Well you, why distract the forces of the fleet? It is enough to call experts and specify the location of 4-5 submarines. laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. FC SKIF
    FC SKIF 16 January 2014 07: 38
    +1
    All the same, the doctrine of geopolitics is true - the countries of the sea creep into and attack the land.
  9. Scandinavian
    Scandinavian 16 January 2014 07: 38
    0
    Already painfully busy traffic takes shape in the Pacific Ocean, as if one of the striped Vietnamese diesel strands was cut off ...
  10. Alikovo
    Alikovo 16 January 2014 07: 42
    0
    they would better restrain themselves from the harmful influence on the whole world.
  11. Kunar
    Kunar 16 January 2014 08: 06
    0
    Quote: Scandinavian
    Already painfully busy traffic takes shape in the Pacific Ocean, as if one of the striped Vietnamese diesel strands was cut off ...
    ....... and thank Vietcong bully
  12. Lumumba
    Lumumba 16 January 2014 08: 19
    +1
    By striking a total of 8-10 15A18M (P36M2) missiles in a complete set, 80% of the industrial potential of the United States and most of the population are destroyed (strikes against large cities and industrial centers). In Russia, 58 of these missiles are in service. More than 200 - previous non-modernized modifications (Basic R-36 and previous modification of R-36M).

    Tremble America! Strategic Rocket Forces is watching.
    1. Onyx
      Onyx 16 January 2014 13: 36
      0
      Quote: Lumumba
      More than 200 - previous non-modernized modifications (Basic R-36 and previous modification of R-36M).

      The Strategic Missile Forces are armed with more than 50 R-36m2 and R-36MUTTH missiles. We have no more than 200 missiles of the previous R-36 modification
  13. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 16 January 2014 08: 20
    +1
    I strongly disagree with the "danger of nuclear weapons for the world," but this very weapon has kept it for almost 60 years, there has not been a single large-scale conflict between the "Great Powers", and for Russia it is even more relevant because we have no other means of protection remained, but in information wars, Russia, like France in conventional wars, either surrenders or loses. As for the growth in the number of US missile carriers in the Pacific, it’s natural, because the Pacific region is playing an increasing role pushing the blue and Islamizing Europe to the margins. and more asserts itself and the presence of a couple of extra ships for the Americans will not hurt.
  14. GUARDIAN ANGEL
    GUARDIAN ANGEL 16 January 2014 08: 33
    +3
    To date, there is no power imbalance! Since if the imbalance was on the side of the probable adversary, the question of the expansion of NATO to the east by Western analysts was not discussed on the agenda!
  15. umah
    umah 16 January 2014 08: 49
    +2
    Haha All their Aggis, missile defense systems are just toys (at least for now). The nuclear triad is the real deterrent! Total mutual destruction is a guarantee of peace between nuclear superpowers.
  16. igor.borov775
    igor.borov775 16 January 2014 08: 56
    +2
    The news is why they got excited that changed, Oh, they laid out military secrets, it seems to me that only the sane did not know this, and add the former schoolchildren for them, it’s exactly the suffering as democracy turns out to be different from us like the Yankees and the revolutionaries are completely dead from them the holiday was a success, they gain strength and the rest fell from a chair after reading this news, Well, the trouble is right now they are running in the capital, I mean high-ranking officials like cockroaches and we all will find work in a moment, Don’t tell me military secret garbage in oil but commercial is really a secret, for the older generation there were no surprises and there was no shock for the young people, They were brought up the most important news by this way, this is news from across the ocean and the rest is so-so, here is the Gaidarovskiy forum opened where our economists liberals decide the whole world how to name economic development countries over the past year, This is really a big trouble the word must be chosen so that people will immediately believe it, but It’s much more important to look at the box how smartly they use other people's words, but they can’t say these words in their native language, they say our language is poor and for the economy
  17. kelevra
    kelevra 16 January 2014 11: 34
    +1
    The fools themselves have been stirring up the situation around our countries for decades, and now they are afraid that suddenly Russia will actually attack! We wanted to spit on these "democrats"!
  18. Leshka
    Leshka 16 January 2014 19: 17
    0
    I wonder how many of our squares in the Pacific
  19. alone
    alone 16 January 2014 19: 36
    +1
    Everyone in the world knows how the nuclear war can end. He doesn’t want to die. It’s just talks about where and how much he’s aimed at. He just has to press the buttons and after a while the whole world will die. And if someone survives, we’ll fight the fourth world with stones and sticks.
  20. Bosk
    Bosk 16 January 2014 21: 36
    0
    Something is not believed, because if in the sea more than half of the nuclear weapons carriers this is almost a pre-war situation ...
    1. Know-nothing
      17 January 2014 07: 48
      +2
      For Americans, keeping half of the boats at sea is the norm. In crisis situations (the Caribbean crisis, the collapse of the USSR) they caught up to 80%.

      Let me remind you that Soviet boats went on patrol much less often (according to K Lyabedzka we barely pulled 0,23)
      When the United States in the late 1970s began deploying its Pershing-2 missiles in Europe with a flight time to Moscow of 8 to 10 minutes [...] the operational stress ratio of strategic missile carriers in the Northern Fleet was raised to 0,35 [... ...] it was a gigantic labor and an outstanding feat of the personnel of missile carriers, headquarters, ship repair shops, port workers and logistic support bodies.


      Now KOH of Russian boats does not exceed the Soviet one and is about 0,2.
  21. bob
    bob 31 October 2014 11: 30
    0
    in w o p u them vanzim mace