Military Review

Formation of Russia: possible ways

25
Russia, having been defeated in the Third World War (information war), is rising from its knees.


In the international arena:
we are increasingly beginning to reckon with;
Russia's diplomatic moves relieve international tensions;
the country's defense is increasing;
The Customs Union, the CSTO, the SCO and other organizations created by Russia are gaining ever more significant weight.

In domestic policy:
the economy has stabilized;
incomes of the population do not decrease;
criminalization of society is stopped;
the role of the church in the community has increased;
the emergence (restoration) of civil society and its increasing role in the activities of the state.

We are in the new interwar period. What's next? Where to go, what to strive for?

There used to be goals: to build socialism, to build communism. Then came the goal to build capitalism, a new democratic society. So what is our idea, what should we strive for?

The country's leadership, perhaps because of caution, determines the local (short-term) development tasks of the country. And where is the global task for many years?

Probably, this is the revival of RUSSIA and its role in the world, including territorially. That is, the creation of a union of states: Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Armenia. Many will say: "This is the USSR", others: "This is Tsarist Russia."

Established economic ties, centuries-old история Our state shows that only together we can achieve our independence. What do I need to do?

In foreign policy, based on threats to national security, decisions on neutralization should be based not on economic expediency, but on the achievement of the strategic effect of actions. It is necessary to create a unified national security database and a national security center.

Following the example of the United States, it should pursue an aggressive foreign policy, without neglecting double standards. As an example: why there is still no official appeal to the UN, the Security Council on the interference of a number of countries in the politics of Ukraine, the accusations of the US and NATO in unleashing the so-called revolutions in Arab countries and in contributing to the overthrow of the legitimate leaders of states?

In modern conditions, the UN does not cope with its purpose, and often frankly plays on the side of the United States. There is a need to implement the transformation of the existing world and regional security organizations. For this, it is necessary to develop and adopt a strategy of indirect (asymmetric) actions.

What directions can be:

a) reforming the UN and strengthening the powers of the Security Council. To this end, it is proposed: entrusting the UN with the duties of controlling the main financial (including virtual), migration and resource flows; in opposition to NATO, it is necessary to create regional security systems as an integral part of the UN Security Council in Europe, the Arctic, the Eurasian region and the formation of their power components on the basis of: the European Union, the CSTO, the SCO;

b) actions to transform NATO: Russia, by its consistent and active "introduction" into NATO’s political and military structures, using its influence in them and "delegating" allies to them, must transform the process of NATO expansion eastward to the process of expanding the CSTO collective security system European part) to the west.

At the same time, it is necessary to envisage the development of bilateral military ties between Russia and Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Norway, Sweden, Hungary, Slovakia, Moldova — that is, with those countries that are not significant in the region or in the NATO bloc, at the same time The situation in the region may change.

It may also be advisable to allow the passage of military service under a contract in the RF Armed Forces of citizens of the CSTO member countries, the Customs Union and even other countries of the former USSR (with granting Russian citizenship after 10 or more years of service). At the same time, service is to be held in non-combat units and military units located in other strategic areas. This will create conditions in which the armies of foreign countries will lose their potential military personnel;

c) drawing the US and EU economies into unpromising projects (requiring large financial expenditures): when developing means of transportation (underwater tankers, wireless transmission of energy); development of fuel and energy resources, rare-earth minerals in hard-to-reach areas (Antarctica, Greenland) or not having a state-wide application (shale gas); for “promising” means of warfare (space fighters, weapon force field, androids, geo-weapons);

d) support of the economies of the countries of the former USSR - Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kirghizia, Tajikistan. Just do not consider this support as a simple cash injection into the economy. The need for joint economic projects (including the creation of jobs), some relief in the supply of energy, the development of medicine and education. At the same time, it is possible to consider the renewal of the joint military-industrial complex;

e) support for the Russian-speaking population abroad. This is not necessarily the relocation of former Russian citizens to Russia.

A program for the education of students in Russian universities is also needed. Now a large number of young people from neighboring countries dream of the EU and the USA, one of the reasons is educational grants in the EU and the USA, student exchanges, tourism. And where is our activity in this field, we can lose the Russian-speaking youth!

The policy of supporting the Russian diaspora in foreign countries, primarily in the Baltic countries, Scandinavia and Germany, is necessary, promoting their leaders in political activity, forming public funds and organizations on their basis - that is, the “fifth column”;

f) in foreign economic relations it is advisable to form a system of global transport, communication, energy, information, space and infrastructure projects implemented in Russia, including the main financial world flows, and create conditions for the impossibility (inexpediency) of using military force against us or conquering part of the territory country.

What directions in domestic policy?

In domestic policy it is necessary to solve two main problems: the national and religious issues; social stratification of society.

To solve the national and religious issue, from my point of view, it is necessary to determine the ideology of the state, to conduct cultural and educational reform. The root of all problems is low culture and low education of the population, as well as the absence of a state ideology.

Yes, in these matters one must be tough, and above all in preventing the resurgence of nationalism and the growth of radical currents of religion.

To avoid social stratification: the fight against corruption and bureaucracy; assigning social responsibility to the business.

Now, despite the assurances of the country's leadership, he stole the ruble — you go to jail, squander billions — you will become untouchable. The country should not be untouchable, equality before the law - this is the main ideology.

Every owner of an enterprise, company, commercial organization must be responsible for the standard of living of its employees and their fate, and this, alas, no.

Business does not bear any responsibility, therefore at the present time one of the most common "specialties" is a public servant. This is at least some guarantee ...

For a state of law, a strong and large supervisory body is needed so that no one has the desire to grow fat on the population. So that housing and communal services do not make us pay for air. Only this remains.

At the same time, the bureaucratic body should be reduced. For this it is necessary to form laws so that there is no double interpretation. Yes, it requires qualified lawmakers and managers.

In economics, they talk a lot about avoiding the extractive. Yes, this is correct, but do not forget that mining is different. We need a high-tech mining industry, since we live in a resource-rich country. This will serve for the development of science and technology in industry.

Do not forget about undeveloped territories. Nature does not tolerate emptiness, if we do not inhabit it, do not create infrastructure there, then tomorrow another will come (most likely - Chinese).

The development of remote areas of Siberia, the Far East and the Polar region, including through the resettlement to these regions of immigrants from neighboring countries, forced migrants who have lost the meaning of life (work), miners, etc. - as opposed to guest workers.

Thus, as long as our state does not have a clear program and goal, we will be third, and so on, I will note - not even the second.
Author:
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb 23 December 2013 07: 39
    +12
    There used to be goals: to build socialism, to build communism. Then came the goal to build capitalism, a new democratic society. So what is our idea, what should we strive for?

    To depress liberals from big business, let small and medium ones develop .... if possible.
    Everything else should be transferred to planned rails. Well, do not forget about the social component.
    The fusion of socialism with capitalism is what we need.
    Leave the opportunity to those who can and want to develop a business. And help those who are not a businessman by nature to survive.
    1. Corporal
      Corporal 23 December 2013 10: 00
      +6
      The world needs us as a counterweight to the United States.

      And we need a super-idea. And what you have listed are steps towards the goal.

      The state and people need a clear and understandable reference point, a reference point in order to understand what is right and what is not. What brings us closer to the goal, and what puts us off. So that you can clearly conduct business in politics, society, family.

      Now, we are just trying to look at the reaction of others. We value their assessment of our actions, our past. What will they say. What if they think ?! So we hang out like a guano in the wormwood. Either Stalin is bad or good. Do we need Ukraine and the Caucasus or not? To beat and drive Gaster or to shelter and instill our values?
      Now to democracy, then somewhere else.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 23 December 2013 13: 07
        +2
        Corporal-And we need a super-idea. yes + you need a healthy mind and body nation, and not a generation poisoned by beer ...
    2. sledgehammer102
      sledgehammer102 23 December 2013 10: 09
      +4
      Quote: JIaIIoTb
      To depress liberals from big business, let small and medium ones develop .... if possible.
      Everything else should be transferred to planned rails. Well, do not forget about the social component.
      The fusion of socialism with capitalism is what we need.
      Leave the opportunity to those who can and want to develop a business. And help those who are not a businessman by nature to survive.


      Your words and reality, you very accurately noticed that the development of medium and small businesses improves the living standards of the population much faster than any indexation of salaries and pensions. True, you need to come up with a scheme according to which they could compete with retail chains, since the latter have a huge advantage in terms of pricing policy.
      А for non-businessmen it is even more profitable, since with the advent of IP or LLC, there are an increasing number of jobs, which opens up certain opportunities for them and the main choice.
      Well planning, without it, nowhere, I don’t understand how it was possible to refuse such a necessary thing as strategy.
      1. S_mirnov
        S_mirnov 23 December 2013 11: 37
        +2
        Quote: sledgehammer102
        Well, planning, nowhere without it, I don’t understand how it was possible to refuse such a necessary thing as a strategy.

        They refused to plan in order to destroy the economy of our country - this is obvious.
        The beginning of the article is very funny, the author reads the mantra laughing which she really wants to believe or drive into the heads of readers.
        Very funny is the knee-high measure:
        "the role of the church in the community has increased;" - more and more Russians kneel with candles and pray. The number of churches, mosques is growing (in Moscow they are building a gorgeous mosque near the Olympic sports complex), synagogues! And now also in the army!
        Shopping centers spawn in every city! laughing
        So you sledgehammer102 even attached a SOVIET poster, but you had a RUSSIAN modern manager with a mouse and an iPhone! Or a banker or citizens at an ATM giving a loan!

        Now to the author of the article!
        "The country's leadership, perhaps out of caution, defines local (short-term) tasks for the development of the country. And where is the global task for many years?" - this task is clear to the management and it is even clear why it is not voiced. This goal is to cut the dough in Russia and dump abroad! Look where the children of officials and deputies study and where do they buy real estate?
        if anyone doesn’t believe, then here are the facts ...
        "The Governor of the Krasnoyarsk Territory Lev Kuznetsov was slightly wounded in France from a traumatic weapon, reported the French media.

        The incident took place at the Governor's villa in Cap d'Antibes in France. Two unknown persons broke the door and broke into the house of Kuznetsov and his wife. Armed with traumatic weapons, tear gas canisters and a truncheon, the criminals attacked the owners and stole jewelry worth 200 thousand euros from the house. "
        1. sledgehammer102
          sledgehammer102 23 December 2013 12: 12
          +5
          Quote: S_mirnov
          This goal is to chop dough in Russia and topple abroad!

          This comment will cause many drawbacks, but the overwhelming majority of the so-called traitors were born and educated in the USSR ... How did it happen that their "patriotism" first raised them up together with Yeltsin at the will of the people, and with the real support of the same Soviet citizens, and then they became "traitors."
          Yes, they are traitors, the roots of rotten patriotism and whose honor goes back to the Soviet past. What this poster says about



          Therefore, we can conclude that both in the USSR and in the Russian Federation the problems are the same, it was just submitted to the public for judgment only here. And they stole both here and there, it’s just that their current openness and impudence is simply astounding, and does not cause anything but the desire to put such people on a stake.

          Well, and about education, it’s generally a song, a lot of Soviet people who could send their children abroad did so, or gave them education at the consulate, and the rest did not do this not because they did not want to, but often because that they could not.
          It is a pity that such examples as Stalin and his son during the great Patriotic War are already very few ....
    3. washi
      washi 23 December 2013 11: 13
      +1
      Quote: JIaIIoTb
      To depress liberals from big business, let small and medium ones develop .... if possible. Everything else should be transferred to planned tracks. Well, do not forget about the social component.

      It turns out the Stalinist economy.
      With a developed state. industry and a powerful cooperative sector, including collective farms and artel enterprises
    4. valokordin
      valokordin 23 December 2013 11: 26
      +1
      The fusion of capitalism and socialism is impossible in principle. The experience of the past 20 years says that in our country this type of capitalism is counterproductive. Recently, the condemnation of Soviet power has been reduced, but not quite. Hiddenly this happens in every TV show, at least with one sentence, but a stone or a pebble will be thrown into the past. No matter how the rulers whimper about the effectiveness of private property, or effective managers, it turns out to be a lie. Only state-owned companies are developing, although effective or defective managers will be stolen there, at least for a corporate party. Only a tough and decisive policy in the economy on the basis of social security Russia lives so far only because of the wealth of resources
      1. S_mirnov
        S_mirnov 23 December 2013 11: 46
        +1
        Quote: valokordin
        Recently, the condemnation of Soviet power has been reduced, but not quite. Hiddenly this happens in every TV show, at least with one sentence, but a stone or a pebble will be thrown into the past.

        No less dangerous phenomenon - a distortion of reality, the conviction of the broad masses of the people - that everything is fine, the country is going where it should, led by an experienced and strong leader, so you don’t need to do anything, they will do everything for you, your business is to consume what you feed and do not ask questions. Watch TV, go to religious centers and shopping centers, consume !!! And in the morning to work at the office! Stably so.
    5. The comment was deleted.
  2. makarov
    makarov 23 December 2013 07: 43
    +5
    "Russia, having suffered defeat in the Third World War (information war), .."

    I cannot agree with this author's conclusion. Having indicated Russia as defeated, let the author name the winners .... the so-called "victory" has no statute of limitations, but in this particular case, there was a permanent information war, and it is not over.
    1. sledgehammer102
      sledgehammer102 23 December 2013 12: 01
      +2
      Quote: makarov
      I cannot agree with this author's conclusion. Having indicated Russia as defeated, let the author name the winners .... the so-called "victory" has no statute of limitations, but in this particular case, there was a permanent information war, and it is not over.


      It would be more correct for the author to write something like "The battle is lost, but not the war", since we feel this war even now.
      1. alone
        alone 23 December 2013 19: 01
        0
        The author is mistaken about the CSTO. What is its importance? Well, how can the member countries of the Organization really help Russia? Does the author even know the state of the armed forces of the member organizations?
  3. 020205
    020205 23 December 2013 07: 45
    0
    That bring it all to life, oh let's live laughing
  4. predator.3
    predator.3 23 December 2013 07: 57
    0
    In the international arena:
    we are increasingly beginning to reckon with;
    Russia's diplomatic moves relieve international tensions;
    the country's defense is increasing;



    The Customs Union, the CSTO, the SCO and other organizations created by Russia are gaining ever more significant weight.

    In domestic policy:
    the economy has stabilized;
    incomes of the population do not decrease;
    criminalization of society is stopped;
    the role of the church in the community has increased;
    the emergence (restoration) of civil society and its increasing role in the activities of the state.

    I feel like shouting: "Aliluya!"
  5. saag
    saag 23 December 2013 07: 58
    +3
    There is some alternative history, there is no basis, an alliance of states, the transformation of NATO, bilateral treaties with member-participants, force field weapons, space fighters, the film "Shirley-Myrli" recalls how, thanks to the found diamond, the country could have rest in the Canary Islands for three years
  6. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 23 December 2013 08: 01
    +4
    Incorrect initial settings and generally crazy article. Russia has not yet lost the information war, recent events show that we retreated (as always) almost to Moscow, stopped the enemy and drove him back. Refraction of the situation around Syria and Iran, a split in American society over its "messianism" imposed by Putin's article. Finally, the success of the Russia Today media company. The decision of Russia expressed by Putin on the conservative path of development and on its intention to become a world leader in protecting national and sovereign values ​​indicate that Russia has learned a lot and has launched an information counteroffensive.
  7. Alex_Popovson
    Alex_Popovson 23 December 2013 08: 06
    0
    Wait until the end of the Olympiad, there will be a default, there we’ll see how with the position of Russia in the world.
  8. Very old
    Very old 23 December 2013 08: 07
    +4
    I wonder if there is a ONE body dealing with the prospective development of Russia?
    It seems that the programs adopted by the government are purely declarative;
    "huge plans" is not supported in any way
    Is writing software an end in itself?
    For each item (a.b.vgdede - and this is the author narrowed the list) - a bunch of questions
    a) reform the UN? There, as in an institution, he who pays dances her
    b) transform NATO? Gorbachev, I remember, in words (so gullible) suggested (and received assurances) not to expand
    to the East

    c) no types
    d) and is supported today (although they themselves ...)
    and e) After the collapse of the Union, hundreds of thousands of refugees surged - where? Moscow, St. Petersburg, large cities, southern regions — Krasnodar Territory, Rostov Region, Stavropol — how did they not burst from a sudden influx?
    -and nobody does anything
    But do not invite Plumbing? (where to get it?)
    1. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 23 December 2013 11: 41
      +1
      Quote: Very old
      I wonder if there is a ONE body dealing with the prospective development of Russia?

      I strongly suspect that yes, but my suspicions about this BODIES you are unlikely to like it ... it is rather from the field of anatomy ... what
  9. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 23 December 2013 08: 13
    -1
    from the Don.
    I advise you to read the article by A.Prokhanov.http: //politikus.ru/articles/10111-aleksandr-prohanov-zamkovyy-kamen
    -rossiyskoy-gosudarstvennosti.html
  10. engineer74
    engineer74 23 December 2013 08: 14
    +1
    in contrast to NATO, it is necessary to create regional security systems as an integral part of the UN Security Council in Europe, the Arctic, the Eurasian region and the formation of their power components based on: the European Union, the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the SCO;

    By its consistent and active "penetration" into the political and military structures of NATO, using its influence in them and "delegating" allies in them, Russia must transform the process of NATO expansion to the east into the process of expanding the CSTO collective security system (its European part) to the west.

    Does it seem to me alone that the points are mutually exclusive? wassat The author’s exuberant fantasy however ...
    In general, it does not bother to read: topwar.ru/26312-regata-na-prorzhavevshih-korablyah.html
  11. Orik
    Orik 23 December 2013 08: 29
    +2
    There used to be goals: to build socialism, to build communism. Then came the goal to build capitalism, a new democratic society. So what is our idea, what should we strive for?

    The question is correct, but there is no further narration. Even the unification of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia is not an idea, but a consequence. The author did not give an answer to the question WHAT WE AIM FOR?
    1. baltika-18
      baltika-18 23 December 2013 08: 59
      +6
      Quote: Orik
      The author did not give an answer to the question WHAT WE AIM FOR?

      And because he doesn’t know. Article minus, he wrote garbage, collecting in a heap everything that flashed in the press.
  12. Nitarius
    Nitarius 23 December 2013 08: 43
    +3
    Quote: JIaIIoTb

    To depress liberals from big business, let small and medium ones develop .... if possible.
    Everything else should be transferred to planned rails. Well, do not forget about the social component.
    The fusion of socialism with capitalism is what we need.
    Leave the opportunity to those who can and want to develop a business. And help those who are not a businessman by nature to survive.

    Yes, Capitalism with SOCIALISM --- THAT IS WHICH HYBRID IS NEEDED!
    FROM EVERY IDEA FOR A LITTLE! Take the best
    and return to the PLANNED ECONOMY - THE BEST THAT WAS IN THE USSR! it must be adopted!
  13. officer29
    officer29 23 December 2013 08: 48
    +1
    The article has more minuses than pluses! request Another opus "How to equip Russia". No specifics, sheer "manilovism". fool
  14. shurup
    shurup 23 December 2013 09: 11
    0
    After the demarche of Zhirinovsky on the topic of the abolition of parties not participating in the elections, articles such as this began to appear.
    Talk about the benefits of gymnastics without performing minimal body movements is just talk.
  15. Good
    Good 23 December 2013 09: 33
    0
    Correct and good article. There is something to ponder!
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. mitya24
    mitya24 23 December 2013 09: 36
    +1
    The options proposed by the author of the article are more likely to lead to a nuclear winter than to the formation of Russia.
  18. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 23 December 2013 10: 27
    +4
    Do not forget about undeveloped territories. Nature does not tolerate emptiness, if we do not inhabit it, do not create infrastructure there, then tomorrow another will come (most likely - Chinese).
    The development of remote areas of Siberia, the Far East and the Polar region, including through the resettlement to these regions of immigrants from neighboring countries, forced migrants who have lost the meaning of life (work), miners, etc. - as opposed to guest workers.

    The author of the article does not understand anything in politics, religion, economics and does not know geography, a typical example of a multilateral profane. In order for a country to develop in it, the interests of the government and the people must coincide, no religion and no liberal spells will help.
    Where is the author going to resettle the population and how to feed him on permafrost. If the Russians have not settled in some territories, it means that they have serious reasons for this.
    And where the Russians do not settle, the Chinese and other lazy people and loafers have nothing to catch at all, the 2 / 3 Chinese have not mastered their territory with more favorable natural conditions than Siberia in 5000 years.
  19. Good
    Good 23 December 2013 10: 42
    0
    Quote: baltika-18
    Quote: Orik
    The author did not give an answer to the question WHAT WE AIM FOR?

    And because he doesn’t know. Article minus, he wrote garbage, collecting in a heap everything that flashed in the press.

    The author does not give a solution or answer to a way out and situation. We need to think about where we are going, what is the NATIONAL IDEA, what is the GOAL? I have not heard from the government a statement or state development program. Everything is said, and it turns out that every Russian can interpret what was said, as he understood it? In my opinion this is not right. It turns out like in that fable of Krylov, about a swan, cancer and a pike ....
    1. military
      military 23 December 2013 16: 05
      0
      Quote: Good
      I have not heard from the government a statement or state development program.

      I didn’t hear a intelligible program from the president ... maybe I missed something ... repeat
  20. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 23 December 2013 10: 43
    +3
    Adopting boorish and cynical methods of US action in world politics is not good for us. But to make their ideological work against the West more offensive, more concrete, and extremely necessary. Unfortunately, Russia is often in the role of a defending party. We need to end this situation. Ideological "tolerance" must be unacceptable. Only to advance and win.
  21. olviko
    olviko 23 December 2013 11: 11
    0
    "So what is our idea, what should we strive for?"

    The state, leadership, business is understandable. It is not clear what is the role of the people in all this? Or again, the people-loser, watching from the sidelines how everything is divided and exported around him that, according to the constitution, seems to belong to him, to this very people. The foundation of the idea, in my opinion, should be the building of a state reflecting the genuine interests of the Russian People. the case is everyone who accepts the values ​​of Russian Civilization and Culture, uniting, first of all, on the basis of the Russian World View, Christians, the peoples of traditional Islam, Buddhism, and the peoples of Siberia, i.e., all the indigenous population living for centuries in Russia.
  22. I think so
    I think so 23 December 2013 11: 16
    -1
    A striking example of MANILOVSHCHINA is when to do nothing, and to tell fables to himself and to all those around him ... The initial messages are FALSE, respectively, and conclusions and suggestions CANNOT BE ADEQUATE.
    For example:
    In the international arena:
    we are increasingly beginning to reckon with;

    It’s strange, for example, I don’t know ANY EXAMPLE OF SUCH reading ... If only I would bring one in the article.

    Russia's diplomatic moves relieve international tensions;

    Again, nonsense ... Tension is removed ONLY when the United States and Russia want it at all ...

    the country's defense is increasing;

    Well, this thesis does not cause any other emotions besides a smile. After the defeat of OWN (?) Army, it is simply ridiculous to talk about increasing the defense capability of the old ... Soon there will be no nuclear missiles left in the ranks, but they will talk about "increasing the defense capability" ...

    In domestic policy:
    the economy has stabilized;

    That's exactly "stabilized", almost a complete STABILIZER came ...

    incomes of the population do not decrease;
    And what about expenses? They grow by leaps and bounds ...

    criminalization of society is stopped;
    Much further, if ALL AUTHORITY and PROPERTY already belong to thieves and bandits, where to further criminalize the country?

    the role of the church in the community has increased;
    And does the author consider this a plus? ANTOGANISTIC denominations are growing in the country, and the author cradles us, which is good. Soon, Muslims and Orthodox REALLY start to fight (already fighting in some places) everywhere, the author gives this out as the country's success.

    the emergence (restoration) of civil society and its increasing role in the activities of the state.

    Well, there is nothing to say. ENEMIES OF THE COUNTRY STRENGTHENING svio positions and are preparing to plunge the country into another abyss of revolution, civil war and chaos, and the author found a "strengthening" here too.

    Truly true - if you want to punish a person who is deprived of his mind, if you want to punish a country - put that punished in the lead ...
  23. olviko
    olviko 23 December 2013 11: 19
    +1
    "Spent billions, you become untouchable."

    "Whoever steals from the treasury more than a meter of rope is worth, he will be hanged on this rope."
    Peter I
  24. Song Hu Chan
    Song Hu Chan 23 December 2013 11: 25
    +1
    Landmarks are marked, it remains only to ask the question, who will carry them out? The bulk of the population of Russia, except for megacities, is in prostration, not perceiving the reality of being other than the urgent
    needs of survival. Russian as a defining ethnos in civilization
    process until they are able to unite as a nation. Other nations are clamped
    religion and orthodox mentality, virtually passively
    perceiving civilizational trends.
    Yes, we need a passionate idea that can unite the Russians!
    And here, of course, we need the role of a state capable of supporting progressive directions.
    1. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 23 December 2013 12: 27
      +1
      Quote: Sun Hu chan
      Landmarks are marked, it remains only to ask who will fulfill them? The bulk of the population of Russia, except for megacities, is in prostration, not perceiving the reality of being except fulfilling the urgent needs of survival.

      The Russians, as a nation, rallied over 2000 years ago, and the as yet unshakable unity remains. There is no prosration in megacities; people live and work, as it should be in a normal peaceful country.
      Russia does not need any passionarity, big jumps, jerks and jumps. Russia needs a sound economic and financial policy of the government.
      The government is obliged to protect the domestic market and its businessmen from foreign expansion, to ensure firm protection of industry and agriculture from the arbitrariness of the grabbers of officials and from crime.
      The people should be given the opportunity to work and earn money, and not stick around with their outstretched hand for approvals and permissions from dozens of bureaucratic offices.
      It is high time to destroy the parasites of dealers, intermediaries, racketeers and other scum.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  25. nod739
    nod739 23 December 2013 11: 35
    0
    the economy has stabilized;
    incomes of the population do not decrease;

    where?
    simple example
    a slight glut of the metal market, a slight drop in prices, Mechel graters with debts, a drop in stock prices, resulting in delayed payments of salaries and debts to contractors, which are several million citizens. maybe not all concerns but many, even those who are a little aloof from metallurgy.


    Quote: JIaIIoTb
    To depress liberals from big business, let small and medium ones develop .... if possible.
    Everything else should be transferred to planned rails. Well, do not forget about the social component.
    The fusion of socialism with capitalism is what we need.


    but this is the most sensible thought, +
  26. Mhpv
    Mhpv 23 December 2013 14: 18
    0
    Russia, having been defeated in the Third World War (information war), is rising from its knees.

    This war has no end and edge, so Russia could lose in it, only separately taken episodes, and as in any war there are no victories without defeats.
    People want everything at once, and this is possible only with destruction, but it’s always difficult to revive, you yourself know, ideology existed in the USSR for this, but for now, the cash cult prevails in our country.
  27. Sour
    Sour 23 December 2013 14: 46
    0
    The main thing should be three things - the welfare of the nation and its sovereignty and security.
    These are values ​​not subject to revision in any way. Everything else must be subject to this.
    A nation is first of all those who are ready to connect their destiny with Russia, while not requiring separate preferences for their farm (or village). Either you are with Russia, without any conditions, or you are an outsider. And do not enroll these outsiders into a single people, without even asking their consent.
    Equality of citizens, but not of nations, must be respected. In Russia there are state-forming nations, primarily Russians, and their interests should be considered first.
    Ideology? It is necessary, but good only when it puts the welfare and security of the nation in the first place. All other ideologies, including those advocating "justice" and "brotherhood of peoples," should be placed outside state support.
    Because practice has shown that behind "justice" is the desire of idlers, bawlers and lazy people to make everyone like them, in terms of their standard of living. “Let it be bad for me, but for the neighbor to be no better” - this is the slogan of the supporters of “justice”. And behind the "brotherhood of peoples" is the desire to again put on the neck of the Russians all Russophobes, all haters of Russia. So that they continue to overeat at the expense of Russia, but at the same time they hate and despise it.
    In short - the welfare, sovereignty and security of the nation are above all, and "justice" and "brotherhood of peoples" are in the furnace. This is somehow the case. I am for such a Russia.
    In some ways, the current government suits me, in some ways it doesn't.
  28. Alexey Prikazchikov
    Alexey Prikazchikov 24 December 2013 07: 51
    -1
    supporting the economies of the countries of the former USSR - Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan. Just do not consider this support as just a cash injection into the economy. Joint economic projects are needed (including the creation of jobs), some concessions in the supply of energy resources, the development of medicine and education. At the same time, it is possible to consider the issues of resuming the joint military-industrial complex;


    The author is killed by your stupid head against the wall.
  29. Sed
    12 March 2014 16: 08
    0
    And as you now look at some suggestions in this article. We accept the Russian-speaking population from all CIS countries. Ukraine has shown to many what it is necessary to go and that the Russians, until they show weapons, are not afraid