Military Review

Mikhail Leontyev: “It is beneficial for us to save America”

98
Mikhail Leontyev: “It is beneficial for us to save America”Mikhail Leontyev - about pests in the government and the deal with the USA.


October 7, on his birthday, Vladimir Putin was going to meet on the margins of the APEC summit with Barack Obama. But the crisis in his country prevented him from coming to Indonesia.

Did the efforts of our diplomacy really save Syria from the attack of the West? What is more necessary for America now - a new war in the Middle East or a partnership with Russia? And how strong is Russia itself to play a key role in global politics? We talked about this with the famous TV presenter and publicist Mikhail Leontyev. By the way, October 12 to our interlocutor and author of sharp speakers in AIF marks 55 years.
Jesuit politics

Vitaly Tseplyaev, AIF: Mikhail, you recently returned with armory exhibitions in Nizhny Tagil. Is our defense industry more alive than dead?

Mikhail Leontyev: She is not faster, but absolutely alive! We already have a completely different Armed Forces than 5 years ago. Some aircraft purchased for the army more than 600. Only the United States and China are purchasing more ... Yes, the rearmament program comes with tremendous difficulties, with a screech. But the defense industry is the only thing that lives in spite of that macroeconomic policy, which I consider completely Jesuit and moronic.
What's happening? It seems that the pests are in the government! In a crisis, overestimate the price of the loan, reduce liquidity, wildly overestimate the rate of the national currency can only crazy. In the world, zero rates, we have destroyed the loan market, the loan is available only to privileged recipients. With inflation we are struggling with monetary methods, although this is the inflation of costs that monopolists generate. In Russia, an insane exchange rate policy: if you have a real exchange rate of the ruble with an open economy increases 4 times, you do not need anything else to strangle your own industry.

Russia is still the largest exporter of hydrocarbons. So far, because soon the shale will make such an exporter the United States. But our domestic gas prices are already higher than American. Electricity prices for industry in 3 increased by 80%. We do not have a single department that would be responsible for the competitiveness of the economy! And she falls. And the government arrogantly, shamelessly lies about the "exhaustion of sources of growth." Revenues are declining - it is necessary to cut expenses, and the paw is pulled towards the only source of growth and modernization - towards the defense industry.

While manages to somehow defend himself. The political leadership has an understanding that this is the only working mechanism of growth, and qualitative growth ... After all, we in the defense industry have already created even what the Soviet Union could not. The Bulava missile, for all its problems, will definitely be brought to the end, and this will be a strategic containment resource for 40-50 years. Next is the 5 generation fighter. Today, only two countries in the world - the United States and Russia - can make such planes ... I would pay attention to the words of Dmitry Rogozin: he said that one of the main goals of huge investments in the defense industry is the development of new technologies, which will inevitably flow over on the citizen. That, in essence, the purpose of the State Arms Program is the new industrialization of Russia.

Uncontrollable chaos

- Let's move from our defense successes to diplomatic. The intervention of the West in Syria, the efforts of Russia finally pushed?

- The intervention in Syria is ongoing. All neighboring countries, including Israel, are the source of such intervention. And it's not just about supplying weapons and training militants. We are talking about the actions of special forces that work there - all know this.

But direct external hits are really pushed back. The agreement reached on the chemical disarmament of Syria is rightly perceived as Russia's foreign policy triumph. And then everything played a role - both our military-technical support of Syria, and our significant presence there fleet, and, by the way, the state of our Armed forces. A country that does not have its military potential does not have foreign policy triumphs by definition!
The situation with the United States has changed. With all the tremendous pressure of the cargo of the former American geopolitics, Obama, in general, is looking for a reason to refuse it. He understands the responsibility for the preservation of the country, and the country is burdened with unbearable obligations to maintain its total domination. And the only way for America to get out of the systemic crisis, in which the American model of the world is, is to negotiate. And America is ready to negotiate for the first time in many years. And with Russia, and with Iran. And with whom else to negotiate with her in the region, where it is necessary to stabilize the situation? Not with Qatar! Qatar can be simply closed with an order from British Petroleum - like some factory ...

- As far as a strike on Syria is still likely?

- It is possible at any time. First of all, Obama is very vulnerable in his policy: America is in a rather difficult condition, his desire to demolish is immense. And provocations against Assad are almost inevitable. Even no new charges will be required: Assad has already been declared a villain. And this is a problem. America is a totalitarian ideological country, if Assad was declared a villain, they cannot refuse it. Although there was almost no more adequate, restrained, tolerant, and European-educated politician in the region. He will be more tolerant than Merkel or Cameron ...

Go home

- Do you understand the logic of the Americans? They are fighting with Al-Qaeda together with the Syrian authorities - the one who showed America the gospel of 11 of September 2001. Not bad, sorry, Washington to make an alliance with the terrorists?

- American politics is absolutely cynical. Terrorists, according to this policy, can be bad or good. But the problem is not even that. Yes, we have many reasons to believe that the September 11 attacks, and, by the way, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, were part of a political plan that allowed us to solve American problems. The “opening” of so many states that interfered with certain forces and interests was ensured precisely by the terrorists ...

But it's time for us to stop evaluating American politics from a moral standpoint. It is really beneficial for us to save America, it is beneficial for America to return from absurdity to healthy cynicism.
Even 10, even 5 years ago, no deals for the United States were possible. They could then have either enemies or satellites. Enemies are targets, and satellites are servants with whom no deals are made. Now they feel the need to negotiate, tack. Feel the need for deals. The situation has changed due to the crisis. After all, America is taking tremendous steps to find a way out of this crisis, it is reindustrializing, robotizing, and returning production to its territory at a tremendous pace. Gas prices in the US are lower in 3 than in Europe, and electricity in 2 is cheaper. Imagine what a competitive advantage! But still this is not enough: in order to get out of that colossal macroeconomic loop into which they themselves have driven, they need to drastically reduce their external obligations. Just "go home."

- Stop being a “world gendarme”? By the way, many countries have their own stable image: China is a “world factory”, Switzerland is a “world safe”, etc. And what image, what role should Russia strive for? What services or values ​​can we offer to humanity? In addition to excellent weapons, of course ...

- World conscience. We can offer God to humanity. Which the Western world cannot offer to himself, because he has become disgusting to him. We can and must offer the world a social model, a project of social order, which would resolve the insoluble and incompatible with life contradictions of the current model. This is a political, social, and economic structure. And it will be the new device, we can not pull this model out of the past: it is not there ...
Originator:
http://www.aif.ru/politics/world/943381
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Hleb
    Hleb 14 October 2013 08: 02 New
    +8
    on the one hand, Leontiev is not overjoyed by the defense industry, on the other, he says that the government is lying impudently and cynically, without mentioning specific names. We are already talking about the success of the government on the Syrian issue and, ultimately, we must save America.
    What new things did he say, which he did not say before, and what no one knows?
    1. a52333
      a52333 14 October 2013 08: 09 New
      21
      Separate the flies from the cutlets:
      1) Success Syria GDP (Lavrov)
      2) Stagnation of the economy of DAM. (A control begs for the head) am
      A vote of no confidence in the government!
      In a crisis, to overstate the cost of credit, reduce liquidity, wildly overstate the national currency can only crazy. In the world, rates are zero, in our country the credit market is destroyed, credit is available only to privileged recipients. We are struggling with inflation using monetary methods, although this is inflation of costs that monopolists produce. Russia has a crazy exchange rate policy: if you have a real ruble exchange rate with an open economy increasing 4 times, you don’t need anything else to strangle your own industry.
      1. Hleb
        Hleb 14 October 2013 08: 13 New
        33
        so what is there to separate? ...
        1. Valery Neonov
          Valery Neonov 14 October 2013 08: 43 New
          +2
          No, they did not have time to agree ... it happens, yeah repeat
          1. a52333
            a52333 14 October 2013 09: 07 New
            17
            Quote: Valery Neon
            did not have time to agree

            No, this is a systemic split.
            By the way, guys, pay attention to RISE articles:
            Just the herald (M. Leontiev) of the king of the priest (GDP) announced in the square that the boyars (government) are the guilty parties of confusion ......
            It seemed to me? I wishful thinking?
            1. Ulan
              Ulan 14 October 2013 11: 57 New
              +4
              It did not seem. It seems that the fate of the Medvedev government has been resolved. I recently heard that the Duma will return to the question of switching to winter time in December.
              Since this cannot happen while the government is headed by Medvedev, apparently by December, the issue of resignation will be resolved.
              I also heard that the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court will be combined into one superstructure, which our "genius" will head.
              But rumors are rumors, although perhaps there is a basis beneath them, and Leont'ev only "keeps his nose in the wind." smile
            2. Skiff-2
              Skiff-2 14 October 2013 14: 07 New
              +9
              Quote: a52333
              Just the herald (M. Leontiev) of the king of the priest (GDP) announced in the square that the boyars (government) are the guilty parties of confusion ......
              It seemed to me? I wishful thinking?

              And they decided to restore the monument to Dzerzhinsky on the Old Square - this is a signal to those who understand. Still, the scaffold on the Forehead and the return of the death penalty for treason. Russia needs a purge of "elites", because as Vladimir Vladimirovich said: "the state must be strong," the current is often encouraged to see the word SOVEREIGNTY in its vocabulary.
              1. a52333
                a52333 14 October 2013 15: 08 New
                +7
                Quote: Skif-2
                Leontiev, just "keeps his nose in the wind

                AHA, but with a little correction. Soothes the people. The rating of GDP begins to fall due to the "partisan" activities of the government. And Leontiev gives us an unambiguous signal - we are preparing for a change of office. A little late, I would like earlier.
                You know, on the way to work, I made such an allegory for myself:
                Imagine a lion pride. The dominant male (USA) began to grow old, and the young lion first takes away a piece of meat from the old one (Syria). And now, practically without a break, weave off female hegemon (government) But the old lion is strong. You can grab yourself.
                Allegory. Just a comparison with the natural world. repeat
            3. alekseyal
              alekseyal 14 October 2013 14: 58 New
              +5
              Quote: a52333
              Just the herald (M. Leontiev) of the king of the priest (GDP) announced in the square that the boyars (government) are the guilty parties of confusion ......

              The power in Russia has long been heterogeneous (there is a struggle going on) there are both patriots and an outright fifth column, sometimes this struggle goes out:
              1. Remember the situation with Libya, what Medvedev said and what Putin said.
              2. Evgeny Primakov said last year that the tandem was over.
              3. Putin says we will allocate 450 billion for infrastructure projects, the government (Medvedev) says let's cut budget spending.
              4. Putin speaks of deoffshorization of the economy, the government sells the port of Vanino to Cyprus offshore.
              5. Most of Medvedev’s initiatives have been canceled or quietly sabotaged (cancellation of zero per mille, privatization plan for 2013 is 6% completed)
              And there are many such examples.

              If Medvedev were still the president, or feel the difference. Comparison of the actions of Medvedev (Libya) and Putin (Syria)
              http://nstarikov.ru/blog/30266
              1. a52333
                a52333 14 October 2013 15: 24 New
                +2
                Quote: alekseyal
                2. Evgeny Primakov said last year that the tandem was over.

                Good day. I missed that moment. Share the link. or better yet, throw here the universal.
                link to http://nstarikov.ru/blog/30266 good
                1. alekseyal
                  alekseyal 14 October 2013 18: 20 New
                  +1
                  Scored in Yandex, Primakov about the tandem
                  First link. In January of this year it was.
                  http://www.forbes.ru/news/232038-primakov-obyavil-o-kontse-epohi-tandema

                  More about the difference in Russia's diplomatic position on the Libyan and Syrian issues
                  http://nstarikov.ru/blog/23110
                  1. a52333
                    a52333 14 October 2013 19: 31 New
                    +1
                    Thanks, I read. According to Starikov, I share your thoughts and mood in voting by 100%. I don’t know how to react to Yarosvet. Putin, like a red rag. He argued a couple of times, to no avail. And you do not try.
                    1. Yarosvet
                      Yarosvet 14 October 2013 20: 25 New
                      +1
                      Quote: a52333
                      Argued a couple of times, useless
                      You, Alexei, do not argue - you assert without giving a factual justification.

                      Maybe you are pleased to answer the questions for your namesake? Without speculation - purely by the facts? smile
                      1. a52333
                        a52333 14 October 2013 21: 15 New
                        +4
                        Good evening, Yarosvet. Well, we already argued! Each remained his own. What are we gonna rattle the keys? I believe that at this moment there is no better candidate. I believe that the government, with rare exceptions (Shoigu and Ivanov) receive a second salary from the State Department, and this is, if not a failure, then a deterioration in the internal situation of the Russian Federation.
                      2. Yarosvet
                        Yarosvet 14 October 2013 21: 43 New
                        -1
                        Quote: a52333
                        I believe that at this moment there is no better candidate. I believe that the government, with rare exceptions (Shoigu and Ivanov) receive a second salary from the State Department

                        So the fact of the matter is that you draw conclusions based not on facts, but on speculation - and the conclusions are mutually exclusive:

                        The government works for the State Department, but there is no evidence for this - this is speculation.

                        But suppose that it is so - we get that the government appointed by the president works for the State Department, but the president is clean.

                        The President violates the Constitution by signing and introducing anti-constitutional bills, domestic policy is a failure, but he is the best candidate.

                        Domestic policy is a failure due to work for the State Department of the government appointed by the guarantor, but everything is good in the external one.

                        everything is good in foreign policy, although it should be the other way around, since the government works for the State Department - etc.


                        Where is the logic? request
                      3. 528Obrp
                        528Obrp 15 October 2013 03: 06 New
                        +2
                        Quote: Yarosvet
                        The government works for the State Department, but there is no evidence for this - this is speculation.

                        This is not speculation. These are assumptions based on the connections of liberal shouchers with bankers.

                        Quote: Yarosvet
                        But suppose
                        - let’s lower the rope ... the same from the field of assumptions and, in principle, has the right to life, but

                        three functions of government - in the economic field -
                        -1- maintaining efficiency, which consists in correcting market disruptions caused by monopolies, environmental pollution and cataclysms;
                        -2- maintaining justice, which consists in creating a mechanism of progressive taxation and redistribution of national income;
                        -3- maintaining stability, which consists in using macroeconomic levers to return the economy to its natural level.
                        All three functions must be performed in such a way as not to disrupt the action.
                        market mechanism.
                        The mechanism for fulfilling the points listed above is lobbied by market theorists at the level of Gref and Kudrin and is supported by the iPhone.
                        Foreign policy work is carried out by other government departments, not liberals - hence success.
                        Putin is balancing on a very fine line. The magnitude of his freedom is determined by the circulation of the dollar, hence the compromise. As soon as the scales are tilted towards another reserve currency, the Gref and DAM watches are numbered.


                        Quote: Yarosvet
                        President violates the Constitution

                        What kind of articles?
                      4. Yarosvet
                        Yarosvet 15 October 2013 14: 36 New
                        +1
                        Quote: 528Obrp
                        This is not speculation. These are assumptions based on the relationships of liberal shouchers with bankers
                        What kind of riffraff and which bankers? What is the difference between this riffraff and Putin? On what grounds are conclusions made about the differences, and that it was a ragman who has contact with bankers, and not Putin? What is the manifestation of this connection, what are its mechanisms?

                        -1- maintaining efficiency, which consists in correcting market disruptions caused by monopolies, environmental pollution and cataclysms
                        Performance criteria?

                        -2- maintaining justice, which consists in creating a mechanism of progressive taxation and redistribution of national income
                        Social justice is possible with a flat scale (Putin spoke out against a progressive scale), one of the main redistribution mechanisms is the establishment of an adequate minimum wage, which takes place through a bill signed subsequently by the president.

                        -3- maintaining stability by using macroeconomic levers to return the economy to its natural level
                        Criteria of stability, natural level and list of leverage?

                        The fulfillment of all three functions should be carried out in such a way as not to disrupt the operation of the [/ b] market mechanism
                        With what joy should someone care about maintaining the market mechanism? Which document obliges the government to implement this, and 3 numbered paragraphs?

                        The mechanism for fulfilling the points listed above is lobbied by market theorists at the level of Gref and Kudrin and is supported by the iPhone
                        Signified gentlemen LOBBY 2nd point? !!! belay
                        Maybe it is still blocked?
                        In addition, what are the lobbying / blocking mechanisms? Patriot Putin, pulling an iPhone and making him a warmer for a chair, a masochist?

                        other parts of the government, not liberals - hence success
                        It is illogical - the work on implementing both foreign and domestic policies determined by the president is carried out by people appointed by the president: there are no mechanisms that allow mythical liberals to have weight in domestic politics, but at the same time prevent them from having it in foreign policy.

                        Putin is balancing on a very fine line. The magnitude of his freedom is determined by the circulation of the dollar, hence the compromises
                        What is the relationship between the circulation (spread) of the dollar and Putin’s freedom, the borders of which are determined by the Constitution that he violates?

                        As soon as the scales are tilted towards another reserve currency, the Gref and DAM watches are numbered
                        Mechanism?

                        What kind of articles?
                        h 3 s 80; h 3 with 90; with 2; with 7; from 17; from 18; with 133 shopping mall.
                      5. 528Obrp
                        528Obrp 15 October 2013 18: 04 New
                        0
                        First, it’s stupid to ask questions about the functions of government. This is from the textbook.
                        Secondly, I did not find anything in the articles of the constitution you listed.
                        If you consider marsh planting disturbances, then damn what to do with those people who public toilets smash, sorry.
                        Well, in order to conduct a conversation about a liberal shusher, you need to study the issue of the central bank. Then about the degree of freedom and about the dollar and everything will be clear. If you do not want to look for a link to you, you can read nothing there, take only the articles of the constitution and the Federal Law number. And then we'll talk. http://ajbolit444.livejournal.com/452358.html
                      6. Yarosvet
                        Yarosvet 15 October 2013 20: 50 New
                        0
                        Quote: 528Obrp
                        First, it’s stupid to ask questions about the functions of government. It's from the textbook
                        The functions and powers of the government are determined and regulated not by textbooks, but by the Constitution and legislation.

                        Secondly, I did not find anything in the articles of the constitution you listed
                        Articles 80 and 90 oblige the president to comply with the provisions of the Constitution and federal law.
                        Articles 2, 7, 17, and 18 affirm the Russian Federation as a social state, which implies the establishment of social guarantees on the principle of sufficiency and sufficiency.
                        Article 133 of the Labor Code is part of federal law and states that the minimum wage in the Russian Federation cannot be lower than the subsistence level.
                        Signed by the president 232-FZ of 03.12.12/7633/5205 once again set the minimum wage below the subsistence level (minimum XNUMX, minimum wage XNUMX) - therefore violates the provisions of the Constitution and federal law

                        Well, in order to conduct a conversation about a liberal riffraff, you need to study the issue of the central bank. Then about the degree of freedom and about the dollar and everything will be clear
                        I studied the Central Bank issue very well, the question of Fedorov's delusional statements about Putin's canceling PSAs, etc.

                        If you do not want to search
                        Open the Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and carefully re-read part 2 of 1 - in what and from whom the Central Bank is independent.
                        If something is not clear - write in a personal.
        2. a52333
          a52333 14 October 2013 21: 21 New
          +3
          I read it, thanks. Well, Primakov is a spider beetle. He has a diplomatic language, but you can’t say that he is a scout!
    2. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 14 October 2013 18: 22 New
      -2
      Quote: alekseyal
      The power in Russia has long been heterogeneous (there is a struggle going on) there are both patriots and an overt fifth column, sometimes this struggle goes out
      What is this struggle, how is it manifested, what mechanisms are used?

      Remember the situation with Libya, what Medvedev said and what Putin said
      Evgeny Primakov said last year that the tandem was over
      And that is why the iPhone again shut up the prime minister? laughing

      Putin says we will allocate 450 billion for infrastructure projects, the government (Medvedev) says let's cut budget spending.
      Putin talks about deoffshorization of the economy, the government sells the port of Vanino to Cypriot offshore
      At the same time, not a single member of the government formed by Putin, by the way, was hurt - which suggests that noodles in the form of conversations and real affairs are two different things.

      Most of Medvedev’s initiatives are canceled or quietly sabotaged (canceling zero ppm
      Are there any serious examples?

      privatization plan for 2013 is implemented at 6%)
  • Vadim-Skeptic
    Vadim-Skeptic 14 October 2013 09: 16 New
    +5
    Why should they wedge - Russian citizens will be unemployed, migrants from solar Churkestans will work for them. So GDP and DAM have peace and harmony. They have been together for so long - they need to legitimize their relationship, especially GDP in a divorce)))
  • Revolver
    Revolver 14 October 2013 09: 50 New
    +9
    Quote: Gleb
    so what is there to separate? ...

    In America, there are many dirty nasty heavy low-paying jobs that Americans, even Negros African Americans do not want to go. But illegal meks go for it, and very happy. And in Russia, it seems, Tajiks and other Central Asians play this role. When was the last time you saw a Slave janitor? It seems that even under the Soviet regime.
    1. Reddragon
      Reddragon 14 October 2013 12: 41 New
      +9
      LIES! In any city where there are more or less few migrant workers - you will see the janitor of Slavic affiliation!
      1. kush62
        kush62 14 October 2013 14: 54 New
        +4
        LIES! In any city where there are more or less few migrant workers - you will see a janitor of Slavic affiliation!

        Still look at his appearance.
        1. bif
          bif 15 October 2013 01: 22 New
          +1
          Quote: kush62
          Still look at his appearance

          Normal view.
      2. 311ove
        311ove 14 October 2013 16: 37 New
        0
        Right! Today I went to work, I saw 7-8 people ..... hi
    2. abdrah
      abdrah 14 October 2013 19: 03 New
      0
      Ilf and Petrov even had a character such as a janitor Tikhon. It was just that there were no guest workers, otherwise Ostap da Kisa would not live at the beginning of his journey in a janitor but in a booth where they make shawarma.
    3. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 14 October 2013 20: 27 New
      +1
      Quote: Nagan
      When was the last time you saw a Slave janitor? It seems that even under the Soviet regime.


      You apparently do not know, but in any city in Russia, most janitors are of Slavic nationality.
      1. Pilat2009
        Pilat2009 14 October 2013 20: 35 New
        0
        Quote: Ruslan_F38
        You apparently do not know, but in any city in Russia, most janitors are of Slavic nationality.

        While
  • Horla
    Horla 14 October 2013 14: 36 New
    +1
    Dimon is right! He and his government are throwing down the country's economy, there will simply be nowhere to work soon.
  • zub46
    zub46 14 October 2013 17: 48 New
    +1
    He went to ...
    1. alone
      alone 14 October 2013 20: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: zub46
      He went to ...


      he would certainly go, but a GDP decree is needed. he is not at a step without his decrees
  • Ulan
    Ulan 14 October 2013 11: 51 New
    +3
    There is not a vote of no confidence ... it’s high time to plant it there. (VV Putin- "where is the landing?")
    And put someone against the wall.
    You cannot fool folk wisdom - the fish rots from the head.
    1. Starfish
      Starfish 14 October 2013 13: 16 New
      +4
      There is not a vote of no confidence ... it’s high time to plant it there. (VV Putin- "where is the landing?")
      And put someone against the wall.
      You cannot fool folk wisdom - the fish rots from the head.

      firstly - now is not the 37th year, and secondly they correctly said about the fish and its head, it remains only to decide - who is this mysterious head?
  • Very old
    Very old 14 October 2013 13: 35 New
    0
    Not those times. The government can be criticized. And only. Leontyev M: "the impression is that pests have settled in the government" - they won’t harm themselves!
  • krasin
    krasin 14 October 2013 08: 17 New
    10
    Under the USSR, they told the people to be patient - arms race, USA, international situation. Now it’s about the same thing, some global problems, to save now, their own relatives, some global problems: forgive one debt, we need to arm the army (well, this is sacred), we need to pull science, problems of migration, corruption. The only question is WHEN WILL WE LIVE FOR HUMAN? Or is all life in the struggle ????
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 14 October 2013 08: 25 New
      +7
      this question constantly arises. On the one hand, Russia is the last bastion, but on the other, when will we not only think about saving the world, but also about our people
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 14 October 2013 16: 56 New
        +7
        Quote: Gleb
        this question constantly arises. On the one hand, Russia is the last bastion, but on the other, when will we not only think about saving the world, but also about our people
        - the joke is that they won’t give you. Ok, let’s imagine the following: Russians, having decided that everything is tired, want to live for themselves, send everyone and Syria too, in short, we live for themselves.
        First, they forget about Russia, the world is learning to live without Russia, its political weight is falling, here it’s lost, a good gas field is turning up, Gazprom has these technologies, a solvent country decided to build ten nuclear power plants, Rosaotm sharpened his ears ... Schazz, they gave contracts to a country that has no political weight! Let the sausage roll along Malaya Spasskaya and Kazi along Kurmangazy!
        The second - in Russia again the Swamps are activated to the extreme, already approaching the walls of the Kremlin insolently. The outraged Russian people are demanding to put things in order; according to this demand, riot police are pulling up to the Kremlin. But here - the political weight of Russia is insignificant, they listen to it a little, the UN Security Council cries out about possible "terrible" repressions against protesters near the Kremlin walls ... The Russian Government is trying to object to something in this Security Council, but it wasn’t there - who is listening to her there? There is no political weight!
        Thirdly, on the political agenda in Kazakhstan, the question arises of finding an ally for Kazakhstan, an ally who would have sufficient authority in the world. In other words, it would have sufficient political weight. Russia does not meet this criterion, it makes no sense to continue all these CSTO and Customs unions ...
        In general, something like this, and this is only a small fraction of what can happen, but no, what will happen at the very moment when you decide to LIVE FOR YOURSELF. laughing At first they would be puzzled by the question - but will they let you live for yourself? 1,8% of the total population of the planet STILL themselves 40% of all world wealth of the planet and want to live for YOURSELF! laughing laughing SHCHAZZZZ! laughing You can minus, from this the truth that I posted right now will not become a lie, but will remain true. Try thinking at least occasionally.
  • ben gun
    ben gun 14 October 2013 08: 45 New
    +5
    Quote: Gleb
    What new things did he say, which he did not say before, and what no one knows?


    But what can you say new to this? if you follow the news from this topic and the type of analysts from these areas - what new can you tell? that the defense is struggling but breathing? that the crisis is coming and (according to Khazin) has already come and will be strong and long? or that the government, with its economists and the HSE, is moving anywhere but doesn’t seem to be looking in the whole direction useful for the country? wink
    1. Ulan
      Ulan 14 October 2013 12: 01 New
      +2
      HSE the serpent's nest of liberalism.
  • Ascetic
    Ascetic 14 October 2013 11: 49 New
    +6
    Quote: Gleb
    What new things did he say, which he did not say before, and what no one knows?


    Apparently, the Medvedev government did not stay long. After the Olympics, changes must occur. While American-Israeli agents of influence participate in one way or another in one form or another, an economic course favorable to America will continue. All these characters, headed by Medvedev, are well-known. Leontyev is a biased pro-Kremlin journalist and it’s just that there will be no pests in the government. Moreover, America will apparently be unable to maintain its fifth column as it was in the 90s. Although they will strive at least to maintain their liberal wing in power by any means once they have rocked the Orange Revolution under the leadership of McFaul and transferred power completely to their agents, they did not succeed.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 14 October 2013 12: 06 New
      +6
      Quote: Ascetic
      . After the Olympics, changes must occur.

      Stanislav, and if there were no Olympics? If Sochi did not choose?
    2. Starfish
      Starfish 14 October 2013 13: 21 New
      +4
      After the Olympics, changes must occur.

      just like on the Mayan calendar - only there in 2012 they seemed to promise the end of the world.
      now there is a sacred date "after the Olympics" - and then they will solve the problems with migrants, the Caucasus, corruption. economy, etc. etc.
      But only in 2012 the end of the world did not come, and in 2014 will they begin to solve these problems seriously? that's the question...
  • Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 14 October 2013 12: 29 New
    +4
    and about 600 purchased new aircraft ... what is it? where is it? request
    1. military
      military 14 October 2013 14: 42 New
      +2
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      and about 600 purchased new aircraft ... what is it? where is it?

      it's ... there ... winked
    2. Pilat2009
      Pilat2009 14 October 2013 20: 37 New
      +2
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      and about 600 purchased new aircraft ... what is it? where is it?

      I would like a breakdown by years and types
  • Very old
    Very old 14 October 2013 13: 28 New
    +1
    M. Leontyev: "it is really beneficial for us to save America." Yes, it is profitable, but until we deflate from it the billions that our highly educated economists put into its jaws. Who remembers us, sc. "Dough" from the "airbag" our scientist financiers threw overseas? And where is this pillow today? Themselves were at the line of a real crisis.
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 14 October 2013 18: 08 New
      +1
      Well yes. It is beneficial for us to save America exactly until the moment when something can be deduced from there. You cannot blame Leontiev for naivety, but ...
      What will we encounter when the SGA re-equip the economy, rake up political blockages, push the blacks into Liberia and drive someone who knows stinky under the bench? Yes, and restructure debts ?! Modern American dictatorship will seem to us then in an advisory voice.
      Because in this case, only two countries will remain on the planet, capable of implementing the full production cycle of modern technologies on its territory. China? There are some doubts ... In general, updated SGA will not tolerate us, and will no longer need us. No need to negotiate with them. Oh no ...
  • Botanologist
    Botanologist 14 October 2013 13: 41 New
    +5
    Quote: Gleb
    and in the end, we must save America.


    Something I did not understand Leontiev. Who was he going to save there? America? And how, interesting? Again all the money in US bonds? Not really, she died so she died.
    And in Syria it is somehow inarticulate. "foreign policy victory." We need Syria so that at the time of the collapse of the United States, all eastern oil kings will not rush to sell oil and gas to Europe, while our Gazprom is holding a bump. Let him talk about this, and not some "victories."
  • honest jew
    honest jew 14 October 2013 13: 43 New
    +2
    Still not save when about 600 Russian billion gold and currency invested in American securities. The next trindun this Leontiev, as the authorities will tell him, so he gives the people the news !!!
    1. Very old
      Very old 14 October 2013 15: 41 New
      0
      Itzik, good YOU are mine. Is this really the only time that I agree with you? However, this is the "concern" of Chubais.
    2. SPACE
      SPACE 14 October 2013 18: 43 New
      0
      Quote: Old very
      Who remembers us, sc. "Dough" from the "airbag" our scientist financiers threw overseas?


      Quote: honest Jew
      About 600 Russian billions of gold and currency are invested in American securities.


      Well, Russian gold is in Russia, but about green paper, do you seriously believe that you will be able to maintain its purchasing power by keeping it under your pillow? So the best place for them is where they came from, and investments in American securities can be perceived as a contribution to the future return of Alaska.
  • zub46
    zub46 14 October 2013 17: 47 New
    0
    In the closing lines, he said that Russia in relation to its citizens should behave according to "concepts", that is, in fairness. Most likely, this is a new (old?) Model for the development of Russian society along the socialist path.
  • alone
    alone 14 October 2013 20: 50 New
    +2
    Quote: Gleb
    on the one hand, Leontiev is not overjoyed by the defense industry, on the other, he says that the government is lying impudently and cynically, without mentioning specific names. We are already talking about the success of the government on the Syrian issue and, ultimately, we must save America.
    What new things did he say, which he did not say before, and what no one knows?


    in my opinion he was already confused like the old general Ivashov. can he give Leontev a vacation so that he could rest? this is not his only puncture.

    I don’t like journalists who pretend to be self-conscious. He’s not a member of the Russian Security Council.
  • MolGro
    MolGro 14 October 2013 08: 04 New
    13
    Leontiev with the slate is wrong!
    If this were beneficial, then there would be no such debts for shale companies.
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 14 October 2013 10: 13 New
      +7
      Quote: MolGro
      Leontiev with the slate is wrong!

      I completely agree. Like Misha is an informed guy, and he retells such tales aloud. Another tale in the spirit of SOI. Shale gas horror stories were invented specifically to contain the rise in world gas prices, since growth is beneficial primarily for Russia.
      But our domestic gas prices are already higher than American. Electricity prices for industry grew by 3% over 80 years.

      I have no words. One mate ... am
      1. Ulan
        Ulan 14 October 2013 12: 05 New
        +1
        And how to compete with our domestic industry? What are the powers that be called for? As if we are deprived of perhaps one of the few, our natural advantage?
        But energy monopolists are getting richer at an accelerated pace.
        "Energy superpower" however, the president’s task is completed. sad
    2. 528Obrp
      528Obrp 14 October 2013 11: 06 New
      +2
      Quote: MolGro
      If this were beneficial, then there would be no such debts for shale companies.

      Shell sells shale assets.
      http://minprom.ua/news/134366.html В принципе это так. Запасы gas lower than expected. But there is also shale oil. That’s the highlight. They reduce the supply of crude oil, increasing its production volumes. And, thereby, dating the gas. According to various estimates, it is profitable to produce it at the price of oil on the foreign market from $ 85 to $ 90 per barrel (I don’t remember exactly). And while oil prices high states receive real money from the sale of oil products from this oil.
      But the question is: what will happen if oil prices fall? Saudis for example flirt
      Or (completely sedition) ours will throw her down? It seems stupid, but look 2008-2009. Recovery in Russia began at an oil price of $ 76 per barrel.
      1. a52333
        a52333 14 October 2013 11: 19 New
        +2
        Quote: 528Obrp
        Saudis for example flirt
        Or (completely sedition) ours will throw her down?
        It is unprofitable for us to drop the price for us. We would have a GREAT CHOCOLATE if Iran mated with the Saudis and Qatar. Price to heaven, China will anchor.
        1. 528Obrp
          528Obrp 14 October 2013 11: 41 New
          +2
          Quote: a52333
          It is unprofitable for us to drop the price

          This is so.
          But! Low oil prices - "Control shot" and the "shale revolution".
          1. a52333
            a52333 14 October 2013 12: 12 New
            +5
            Yes, there is no shale revolution. This is the usual DESA. Cost is high + environmental damage. This is just a bidding technique to lower natural gas.
            1. 528Obrp
              528Obrp 14 October 2013 12: 29 New
              +3
              According to the "shale revolution" - a bubble inflated to fight our oil and gas expansion - definitely! Without a doubt! I know very well what is hydraulic fracturing and the whole subsequent technological chain. This is not about that. The shale bubble is a means of political blackmail, which is used by Ukraine and Poland ... etc.
              Significantly blowing off this bubble means winning another game in geopolitical chess.
              1. 528Obrp
                528Obrp 14 October 2013 13: 02 New
                +1
                http://www.forbes.ru/sobytiya/ekonomika/240808-neftyanoi-puzyr-pochemu-slantseva
                ya-revolyutsiya-v-ssha-blizka-k-provalu

                On the topic of reducing the cost of oil.
        2. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 14 October 2013 14: 34 New
          +1
          Quote: a52333
          We would have a GREAT CHOCOLATE if Iran mated with the Saudis and Qatar.

          + good
    3. Russ69
      Russ69 14 October 2013 11: 39 New
      0
      Quote: MolGro
      Leontiev with the slate is wrong!
      If this were beneficial, then there would be no such debts for shale companies.

      And at the same time, companies producing shale gas in the United States have large tax breaks.
  • alexng
    alexng 14 October 2013 08: 05 New
    +9
    “It’s beneficial for us to save America”

    Yes, but she will still remain ungrateful trash.
  • tronin.maxim
    tronin.maxim 14 October 2013 08: 05 New
    17
    It seems that the government has pests! It really is! But we have democracy, so we threaten only with a finger (ayayai can’t do this, bad!) And no more. Viewers of the right are violated! Ah Stalin, dear, you are ours, how you are missing!
    1. military
      military 14 October 2013 14: 46 New
      +3
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      It seems that pests have settled in the government!

      hi and the Kremlin, of course, is defending itself? ... heroically ... wink
      By the way, I even know who "planted" these enemies there ...
      1. michajlo
        michajlo 15 October 2013 00: 21 New
        0
        Quote: military
        Quote: tronin.maxim
        It seems that pests have settled in the government!

        hi and the Kremlin, of course, is defending itself? ... heroically ... wink
        By the way, I even know who "planted" these enemies there ...

        Hello dear!

        Your thoughts and conclusions, I like. good But I would like to read the ending of the conclusions?

        Or is Aesop's best tongue for meaningful "blowing her cheeks"? smile
  • Sergeant
    Sergeant 14 October 2013 08: 08 New
    +4
    ... It seems that pests have settled in the government!


    Judging by the many financial and economic perversions that are happening in the country - the way it is!
    1. korotkov2033
      korotkov2033 14 October 2013 22: 57 New
      0
      I propose that Mikhail Leontiev first choose in the government. But there and in the presidency and life in the country I feel like a storm, industry will work, etc., etc.! What if my dreams come true?
  • Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 14 October 2013 08: 11 New
    14
    We already have completely different Armed Forces than 5 years ago. One aircraft purchased for the army more than 600.
    So I want to ask Misha-Sikoko, Sikoko purchased planes laughing Okay, trolling, so trolling ... We bought 1600 aircraft. And it is more than in the USA winked

    And the government is brazenly, shamelessly lying about the "exhaustion of sources of growth." Incomes are reduced - it is necessary to cut costs, and the paw reaches out to the only source of growth and modernization - to the defense industry.
    Well, why lies, it does not lie. They just picked up boys with European diplomas for work, and that’s the result. As they were taught there, they work like that.

    - World conscience. We can offer God to humanity. Which the Western world cannot offer itself

    Not a conscience, not God, perverts are not needed! For a start, we ourselves need a thread of both.
    1. SPACE
      SPACE 14 October 2013 19: 37 New
      0
      Quote: Leontiev
      World conscience. We can offer God to humanity. Which the Western world cannot offer itself

      Leontiev ran into the lyrics, ec kumarat himlaughing
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Not a conscience, not God, perverts are not needed! For a start, we ourselves need a thread of both.

      Quote: Leontiev
      And to what image, what role should Russia strive for? What services or values ​​can we offer humanity? Besides excellent weapons, of course ...

      Well, Lenya unconsciously and answered this question, Russia needs to deal with the global LAW! And to pay for it.
  • bomg.77
    bomg.77 14 October 2013 08: 38 New
    +8
    All this honey, Leontiev pours for a couple of spoons of tar! And he scolded the government and praised (a la objectivity), and all this is an interview, for the sake of this phrase
    But it's time for us to stop evaluating American politics from a moral point of view. It is really beneficial for us to save America, it is beneficial for America to return from the absurd to
    1. Valery Neonov
      Valery Neonov 14 October 2013 08: 51 New
      +3
      hi Ugly, agree ... phrases.
      1. bomg.77
        bomg.77 14 October 2013 09: 34 New
        0
        Quote: Valery Neon
        hi Ugly, agree ... phrases.
        I agree Valery! hi
  • Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 14 October 2013 08: 49 New
    +6
    hi “It’s really beneficial for us to save America, it’s beneficial for America to return from the absurd to healthy cynicism.”- here I don’t agree; the Americans fell into the pit, here and let them crawl out of it themselves, they have enough helpers: the Anglo-Franco-Japanese-Koreans, will throw off their gilt and ... let's see what happens.
    1. Danilka
      Danilka 14 October 2013 09: 28 New
      +2
      like in a fairy tale, in the pit a wolf is a bear and a hare. And then I wanted to eat ... bully laughing
    2. a52333
      a52333 14 October 2013 09: 39 New
      +5
      Quote: Valery Neon
      here let them crawl out of it themselves


      So what? Will we sit passively and watch? belay no They pushed us into the pit and dug. It's time to repay debts !!!
      1. Botanologist
        Botanologist 14 October 2013 23: 44 New
        0
        Quote: a52333
        It's time to repay debts !!!


        What are you going to take? They have debts only state 17000000000000. And with the internal ones for 200. They will give ... bonds wassat
        1. 528Obrp
          528Obrp 15 October 2013 03: 15 New
          0
          Quote: Botanologist
          What are you going to take?

          In kind
    3. Ulan
      Ulan 14 October 2013 12: 08 New
      +3
      Exactly. Many who saved us. On the contrary, they all strove to push us into the pit.
      Let them get out and slurp the hole they dug for others.
  • SolomonSS
    SolomonSS 14 October 2013 08: 57 New
    13
    My opinion, let America sink in its "shit."
    1. Strezhevchanin
      Strezhevchanin 14 October 2013 11: 05 New
      0
      Quote: SolomonSS
      My opinion, let America sink in its "shit."

      Of course, I agree with you, and all the other friends from a dashing team, where ??? Russia will not act patriotically (unfortunately), but it is true that there is a way out !!!
  • Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 14 October 2013 09: 11 New
    +4
    Well, if the modern Russian leadership is a conscience, then I am a soloist of the Bolshoi Theater, just I still don’t suspect about it, how can a swindler and thief be a “conscience?” And of course, it’s profitable for us to “save” America, because we have to save the “master” that’s what our “government” was set up for, now the Americans will take advantage of their investments made in Russia after 1991. How can modern Russia oppose the USA when it cannot do anything even to stoned Holland? “We demand an apology!”, but the Dutch government the jamb will pull out and lay out a bunch of apologies to you, you need to bend at least the Dutch ambassador, and give the pendal so that it flies to Holland itself.
  • morpogr
    morpogr 14 October 2013 09: 18 New
    +3
    I would like to see how America will live within its means without loans and credits. If you also pay off debts, then probably the level of Africa is sorry sorry for African America.
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 14 October 2013 10: 22 New
      +2
      Quote: morpogr
      I would like to see how America will live within its means without loans and credits

      I would also look at this show. They somehow remained without light for a couple of hours, so their panic began in the style of the World Warrior Z. And if you cancel the loans, I’m afraid to imagine what will happen.
    2. Botanologist
      Botanologist 14 October 2013 23: 48 New
      +1
      Quote: morpogr
      I would like to see how America will live within its means without loans and credits.


      In its modern form, nothing. It will fall apart, then they will create some sort of YUSHA (southern states), and they will leave debts in the state of Maine. And the whole Middle East, by the way, will instantly turn into chaos - to whom will they sell oil? That is why such a struggle for Syria - while it is with us, transit routes to Europe are difficult.
  • Danilka
    Danilka 14 October 2013 09: 26 New
    +4
    Quote: alexneg
    “It’s beneficial for us to save America”

    Yes, but she will still remain ungrateful trash.

    Englishwoman crap wassat and so, if we save, the drowning man will sink to the bottom bully
  • Vadim-Skeptic
    Vadim-Skeptic 14 October 2013 09: 31 New
    +5
    Minus article. Why Russia again has to save someone - they tell us that it’s supposedly beneficial for us. Rave. If the states default, the world will not collapse and the economies of the countries will not fall apart. Yes, the situation will be difficult until normal economists replace current speculator financiers. This cartoon has been specially invented to keep the whole world in demand for the dollar, while the states are still standing in the shade and will solve their problems.
  • Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 14 October 2013 09: 32 New
    19
    It seems that it is time to introduce a military dictatorship in the country.
    And, apparently, it's time!
    The government resigned, and even better - in court.
    Censored in print and on television.
    Soviet model of education.
    Return confiscation of property.
    Return the articles of execution.
    Control of wages, including in private structures (minimum wages must exceed the cost of living by 2 times.

    Introduce significant benefits (the northern ones it was called before) to the settlers of the North, Siberia, and the Far East. Tax incentives (up to 100% of incentives) for small businesses organized in these territories

    and yes, the most important thing is that all enterprises operating in Russia are within the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation. Year to issue. Then - nationalization.
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 14 October 2013 10: 24 New
      +2
      Quote: Silkway0026
      It seems that it is time to introduce a military dictatorship in the country.

      It is high time. Only no one.
    2. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 14 October 2013 13: 02 New
      0
      Quote: Silkway0026
      It seems that it is time to introduce a military dictatorship in the country.
      And, apparently, it's time!

      And who do you think to appoint a dictator - the one who the current government has appointed?
      1. kavkaz8888
        kavkaz8888 14 October 2013 14: 29 New
        +4
        Write out Old Man from White Russia. Let it dictate.
  • SAG
    SAG 14 October 2013 09: 32 New
    0
    Leont'ev, as always, respect! The prophet of our time ...
    1. BBM
      BBM 14 October 2013 09: 59 New
      +3
      Quote: SAG
      The prophet of our time ...

      yeah, only from the circus.
    2. military
      military 14 October 2013 14: 56 New
      0
      Quote: SAG
      The prophet of our time ...

      - Cancer Matkin. "Crotch" ... Ugh, you ... Mark Fradkin. "About tenderness" ...
      1. zub46
        zub46 14 October 2013 17: 54 New
        +1
        Good little thing!
  • SvetoRus
    SvetoRus 14 October 2013 09: 48 New
    +2
    It’s really beneficial for us to save America
    I, personally, see more benefits from her death. At the same time, the theme of "shale gas", so beloved by Mikhail and, perhaps, with our government, so Mikhail not beloved, will be covered. smile
  • The comment was deleted.
  • BBM
    BBM 14 October 2013 09: 57 New
    +4
    Misha Leontev once again proved that he was a good score. In order to save someone, you need to find funds and resources from somewhere. Therefore, an attempt to save America (and this is more than two Russia by population and a dozen by appetite) for the Russian Federation = suicide :(
  • The comment was deleted.
  • a52333
    a52333 14 October 2013 10: 04 New
    +2
    Quote: BBM
    In order to save someone you need to find funds and resources for this from somewhere. (
    US salvation in this context implies “a”
    a) give the opportunity to quietly step aside, cleanse the intestines and stomach, undergo intoxication, and we stand and wait
    b) a control to the head during this process
    1. BBM
      BBM 14 October 2013 10: 45 New
      +2
      Quote: a52333
      ) give the opportunity to quietly step aside, cleanse the intestines and stomach, undergo intoxication, and we stand and wait

      in this case, option a) does not roll because without the Russian Federation there are those who wish to implement option b)
      So the option of salvation - in the form of standing on the sidelines is completely unrealistic. If you just stand it = conscious complicity in the murder (from the point of view of the Americans)
      So the situation looks according to the ancient Russian-Chinese proverb, either you are with us or against us.
      1. a52333
        a52333 14 October 2013 11: 05 New
        +3
        I would divide weighty players into piles.
        a) vassals who are afraid to be left without an umbrella.
        b) Japan and Katai - a separate group - the largest creditors who do not want, to put it mildly, instant death.
        c) the Russian Federation and Germany, in my opinion, are ready to drive a stake.
        1. zub46
          zub46 14 October 2013 17: 57 New
          0
          Good thing. But what about the huge billions that Russia has invested in US Treasury securities and other US assets?
  • explorer
    explorer 14 October 2013 10: 20 New
    +4
    It is really beneficial for us to save America, it is beneficial for America to return from the absurd to healthy cynicism.
    NO!! stop it’s profitable for them to descend at a constant speed to a disaster, so that they squabble among themselves, draw new players into this game (without us). And we quietly rebuild the POWER again, gain strength and then we can:
    "To propose to humanity of God .... a social model, a project of a social structure that would resolve the insoluble and incompatible with life contradictions of the current model"
    - so that the WORLD could no longer from this proposal refuse. laughing
  • explorer
    explorer 14 October 2013 10: 20 New
    +1
    It is really beneficial for us to save America, it is beneficial for America to return from the absurd to healthy cynicism.
    NO!! stop it’s profitable for them to descend at a constant speed to a disaster, so that they squabble among themselves, draw new players into this game (without us). And we quietly rebuild the POWER again, gain strength and then we can:
    "To propose to humanity of God .... a social model, a project of a social structure that would resolve the insoluble and incompatible with life contradictions of the current model"
    - so that the WORLD could no longer from this proposal refuse. laughing
  • major071
    major071 14 October 2013 12: 13 New
    +4
    It is really beneficial for us to save America, it is beneficial for America to return from the absurd to healthy cynicism.

    And what to save her - der.mo does not sink. If only hold at the bottom with your hands. angry
  • vedmeddd
    vedmeddd 14 October 2013 12: 25 New
    0
    "World conscience" - I liked it! But, if you think about it, the whole history only in Russia had a conscience!
    1. Essenger
      Essenger 14 October 2013 12: 53 New
      0
      Are you serious? lol
  • vedmeddd
    vedmeddd 14 October 2013 12: 26 New
    +1
    "World conscience" - I liked it! But, if you think about it, the whole history only in Russia had a conscience!
    1. Strezhevchanin
      Strezhevchanin 14 October 2013 12: 48 New
      0
      Quote: vedmeddd
      all history only Russia had a conscience!

      And if you recall which nations just had a similar concept?
    2. zub46
      zub46 14 October 2013 17: 58 New
      0
      Only not the last 22 years!
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Grandson of Veteran
    Grandson of Veteran 14 October 2013 13: 03 New
    +1
    Quote: Valery Neon
    hi “It’s really beneficial for us to save America, it’s beneficial for America to return from the absurd to healthy cynicism.”- here I don’t agree; the Americans fell into the pit, here and let them crawl out of it themselves, they have enough helpers: the Anglo-Franco-Japanese-Koreans, will throw off their gilt and ... let's see what happens.

    I’m afraid that in fact they will turn the printing house back on at full capacity and print a couple of trillion candy wrappers, but the rest will be told that it’s exactly the “Wedding in the Robin” Papandopulo-Take it, darling, I’ll draw it for myself! ”
  • Starfish
    Starfish 14 October 2013 13: 13 New
    0
    “We already have a completely different Armed Forces than 5 years ago. More than 600 were purchased for the army alone.”

    if I understood him correctly, then over 5 years, 600 new aircraft were purchased. who knows the exact numbers tell me - is this true?

    "What is happening? It seems that pests have settled in the government!"
    these pests have been living there since at least 1985 and are not going to leave at all, only their names and surnames are changing, but the goals are the same

    "- How likely is a blow to Syria?

    “It is possible at any time.”

    the blow will most likely be after the complete elimination of chemical weapons in Syria. for this, it is being carried out so that Israel, in case of an attack on Syria, feels more secure
  • Archibald
    Archibald 14 October 2013 13: 56 New
    -1
    In the future, the South is still more dangerous than the West. The conflict of civilizations has not yet been canceled. As if someone didn’t like it, we’ll have to, someday, unite with the West and Israel. Everything goes to this. Sorry, not everyone understands this yet.
    1. Starfish
      Starfish 14 October 2013 14: 04 New
      +3
      the west is much more dangerous than the south.
      in the south it is possible to resolve issues in a bloody battle, and from the west there is a decay of the people in general and man in particular, and when allied with him, this will be inevitable in our country as well. in this case, we won’t cope with the south - mutual destruction will take place for the joy of the west
  • i_vam_ne_hvoratj
    i_vam_ne_hvoratj 14 October 2013 14: 54 New
    +1
    Dear Colleagues. My opinion on the article is purely subjective. You have the right to disagree with him. I do not pretend to be true in the first instance (But I hope that my opinion will be useful to someone.) Let us from the very beginning. 1. We have two industries that are really developing: heavy machine building (More specifically, the sector called the “defense industry”, thanks to which our armed forces have taken a significant step forward in five years.) Let's face it. Everything is known in comparison ... (http://topwar.ru/34549-korotchenko-panciri-it-90-imeyut-shansy-na-uspeh-v-braz
    ilii-i-peru.html Carefully read the title of the article and feel not pride, but bitterness. Let us recall the “Bulava”, the space program and the ex-Minister of Defense.) Show me those developments that can be implemented in the civilian sector of industry (Better - on the example of specific enterprises.). Let's talk about the export of hydrocarbons. I do not consider the advertising of Gazprom on TV as a mockery. As the immortal Gogol Viy said: “Raise my eyelids” - Like, show me the sources of growth. 2. Let's think a little about uncontrollable chaos. I agree, the only legitimate and sane leader of Syria is Assad. And now about the desire of the United States to agree ... What kind of friend is he who behaves like a student in critical days? (Today, he slams Qatar, which behaves like a train station ... ha. Then it will decide that it is the turn of my homeland. This is wrong.). I want to say thank you to our Sailors, who over the past half century for the third time did not allow to unleash a great war. 3. Now about "Go Home." I can not agree with the author. Any mercantile union is fraught with consequences. Make friends with someone, not against someone. We have been friends with the United States. They look at the rest of the world through two large moats (Pacific and Atlantic), as some of our rulers (………. Fill in the points yourself) at Russia through the MKAD. 4. Draw your own conclusions.
  • 528Obrp
    528Obrp 14 October 2013 16: 09 New
    +1
    Interesting news (for me personally). Finns are getting used to the ruble. Getting ready ...
    http://yle.fi/uutiset/rubli_prinimayut_v_magazinakh_severnoi_finlyandii/6870775
  • patriot2
    patriot2 14 October 2013 16: 39 New
    0
    Michael, I think everyone in the country for this:
    World conscience. We can offer God to humanity. Which the Western world cannot offer itself, because it has become disgusting to him. We can and should offer the world a social model, a project of a social system that would resolve the insoluble and incompatible with life contradictions of the current model. This is a political structure, and social, and the structure of the economy. And it will be just a new device, we cannot pull this model out of the past: it is not there ...
    It’s only in the country that there will be order when both above and below, but it’s a pity that we don’t have to live at this time ...
  • Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 14 October 2013 18: 13 New
    +1
    Russia is so far the largest exporter of hydrocarbons. Bye, because soon thanks to such a shale the USA will become an exporter. But our domestic gas prices are already higher than American. Electricity prices for industry for 3 years increased by 80%. We do not have a single agency that would be responsible for the competitiveness of the economy!

    It would be better for Leontyev not to chat about what he does not understand. The US is more likely to become exporters of biogas and fecal effluents than shale gas, unless, of course, they want to go broke.
    In our country, all departments serve only the oligarchs, since they manage all the financial and natural resources of Russia, and they manage very poorly, without any profit for Russia and its people.
  • USMC
    USMC 14 October 2013 22: 20 New
    +1
    Russia gives the impression of a great power. But she doesn’t produce anything else. (A. Murtazaev)
  • APASUS
    APASUS 14 October 2013 22: 24 New
    +2
    And to what image, what role should Russia strive for? What services or values ​​can we offer humanity? Besides excellent weapons, of course ...
    - World conscience. We can offer God to humanity. Which the Western world cannot offer itself, because it has become disgusting to him. We can and should offer the world a social model, a project of a social system that would resolve the insoluble and incompatible with life contradictions of the current model. This is a political structure, and social, and the structure of the economy

    Sometimes Leontiev rushing so that the thought comes ......... did he smoke?
    An oligarchic, paramilitary state that loses an ideological war to the West can offer the world a social model.
    He can smoke himself ........ then we will stand on an equal footing!
  • understudy
    understudy 15 October 2013 00: 43 New
    0
    Profitable? But only to whom? Those who fired their "hard earned" over the hill, and at the same time all the budget "stabilization" funds?