Leonid Ivashov: "Israel and the United States control the Russian arms trade"

64
Leonid Ivashov: "Israel and the United States control the Russian arms trade"The head of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Leonid Ivashov, in the Pravde.Ru interview, shared his opinion on possible supplies of Russian weapons Iran.

Leonid Ivashov: “There is no problem, do you understand? That's just the route will be a little further, there, but what problems bring weapons to the Iranian port? No problem. And problems are created, in my opinion, by orders from Tel Aviv. Tel Aviv does not want us to deliver to Iran, does not want us to deliver to Syria, but here they just take the visor and answer: "Yes!" That's all. Our military technical cooperation with these countries is fully controlled from Tel Aviv. This is still Ariel Sharon said, as Minister of Defense. Then, in my opinion, somewhere at the end of 90, he, as an inspector, came, figured out who, what, whom you were teaching, and so on.

Therefore, it is necessary to recognize, it is better then, to open a branch of the Israeli Ministry of Defense or Ministry of Commerce, and declare that everything. We, our authorities, while playing with routes, have some difficulties. Two sovereign states! Yes, it is possible somewhere always, and in Soviet times it was always ensured that the balance of forces in this or that region was not upset. Because the balance of power is a guarantee of security in one and the other country. But Tel Aviv, after all, today it surpasses Iran in many parameters, in almost all military-technical parameters. Surpasses

So, in order to prevent the war, you need to put the appropriate weapons to Iran. This is our interest. Thus, we will push the threat away from the Caspian Sea, move the threat away from our borders, move millions of refugees to our country and so on. But, you see, for some reason, our national interests are not in the foreground. I will tell you more than that, what I’ll find out now - even over the summer - you know, frankly, not something that angers - I want some kind of repression against those who, in fact, create.

Look, today, in fact, on the verge of bankruptcy will be the famous firm "Mig",

because through the corruption schemes Mr. Poghosyan pushes Sukhoi planes everywhere. Worldwide, the ratio of light and heavy fighters 70 / 30 in favor of light fighters. Today, light fighters and production, and the development of the general cover. We shove only heavy ones. The infantry will cover and conquer airspace.

I was at the International Nuclear Center in Dubna. You understand, they let me in - he is international. There Americans dominate today. For the Ministry of Defense, we cannot not only nuclear but also conventional weapons, some projects, to be implemented without the permission of this international community. Well, what is this going on? The Ministry of Defense can not enter into a contract.

I visited a surprisingly interesting enterprise - this is the State Research Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Elemental-Organic Compounds. You know, I saw miracles there. Miracles! And including - in the defense sphere. Miracles are simply done — they create composite materials, technologies, and, let's be frank, straight defense products of the second half of the 21st century. Appeals to an American company to cooperate with them. Naturally, closed topics - refuse. Appeals another firm - on the other hand come - refuse. What do our Russian technologies do then? They remove the directors, declare that all the enterprises of Russian Technologies should make a profit, and today they are already walking around, that it is necessary to build a shopping center on the basis of this non-profit institution - there will be a profit tomorrow. Is this not a crime? This is not a betrayal of the motherland? This is a betrayal of the Motherland, you can’t call it another way.

And those who do it, they still hope to escape punishment, to escape, somewhere in the West to hide. First of all, let them look at all these defectors: they will be given away, they will find and put up against the wall for these things. I am convinced of this. And not in any century - this decade will be. Therefore, it is difficult to talk about defense and security today. On the one hand, there was hope that Sergei Kuzhugetovich would come and put things in order, and he started, but we see, but we see how everywhere, everywhere today, obstacles are being put.

The Ministry of Finance does not finance those contracts that the Ministry of Defense was ready to conclude, for example, with Mig. Does not finance simply. This enterprise, which works for the defense industry, for the military space industry of ours, for the same Bulava, for our ship fleet, is working quite successfully, is not able to defend the Defense Ministry, but there is no one else. There is no one in our country to defend - everything is bought, everything is sold, and so on. Therefore, I would like to hope that at least Syria will not surrender - the last ally in the East. ”
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    2 October 2013 07: 50
    About arms control and so it is visible. as soon as we are going to sell something to the Arabs, then the Jews fly in and that's it !. Already no one is selling to anyone. And the damage is billions of rubles. Who will answer?
    1. +9
      2 October 2013 08: 56
      But nevertheless, the Pantsiri and the S-300 still ended up in Syria, and the Novorossiysk Express (a large landing craft with weapons from Novorossiysk to Tartus) runs as if on schedule ...
      After all, not all of our "burnt friends" control ?!
      Comrade Ivashov has always been distinguished by his alarmist statements. But often the questions are raised by the right ones, but you don’t have to paint all the "black color" ... otherwise, as you listen to it, there is so much hopelessness.
      Nevermind, break through! True, as usual, not thanks, but in spite of everything and everyone. But break through! it was worse in our history ...
      1. +3
        2 October 2013 09: 22
        lol Ivashov’s brain periodically turns off. But publishes his opinion regularly.
        Israel and US control Russian arms trade
        Now in a state of "brainOFF"what did you write? belay Leonid Grigorievich, now the president is no longer Medvedev.
        1. +6
          2 October 2013 11: 42
          Quote: a52333
          Leonid Grigorievich, now the president is no longer Medvedev.

          Well, we also heard a tale about a bad and good cop. Do not forget that they are both police officers. Regarding the MIGs, he is right.
        2. skif33
          +1
          2 October 2013 11: 51
          He probably never turned on. If the US and Israel controlled the Russian arms trade, then Russia would not be in the first place in exports, but in the hundred and first. Citizen Ivashov needs to have a bite.
          1. +2
            2 October 2013 12: 06
            Yes, we sell weapons to Venezuela and Syria. And it turns out with the permission of the United States and Israel. Grandfather burns.
            1. +7
              2 October 2013 12: 34
              the wrong term was used by the general, they do not "control", but "exert influence"; Naturally, until Russia has risen to its full height in the international arena, we have to correlate our actions with other centers of power ..... otherwise, we can also slip a hedgehog under the tail and put Georgia's Patriot or even medium-range missiles, bring some nasty stuff to Poland ... so you have to take into account the interests of the opposite side, in order to maintain an international balance
              1. 0
                2 October 2013 22: 59
                put no. Georgia "Patriot"


                Where to get the money, genatsvale?

                They press the Javelins to them, and you are the Patriots. And if ours capture them?
                And the money is gone and technology is revealed?
              2. timer
                0
                3 October 2013 00: 00
                First of all, I agree on the term-really affect.
                Secondly, this is already annoying Poghosyan. Sukhoi never engaged in civilian aircraft manufacturing, there was no superjet imposed on the project. The Union had a clear division in the industry, everyone was doing his own thing. And now, is Poghosyan driving everything and there is nobody else besides dry? Or bought Poghosyan officials from the Ministry of Defense in bulk? Skews will always harm the country's defense capabilities. And our bureaucrats do not give a shit about the defense ?!
            2. 0
              2 October 2013 20: 40
              Head of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems Leonid Ivashov in the interior of Pravda.Ru

              Quote: 31231
              Wow, we sell weapons to Venezuela and Syria. And it turns out with the permission of the United States and Israel. Grandfather burns.

              "Grandfather" decided to follow the "footsteps" of the old senile McCain, who is also an "amateur" to post articles in Pravda.Ru laughing And their style is very similar, both are "pro-Russian politicians" wassat
              Quote from McCain's article:
              "I believe in the greatness of the Russian people and their desire to live in a society of justice, open opportunities and have a government worthy of its aspirations and sacrifices. When I criticize your government, I do not do this because I am opposed to Russia. I do this because you deserve a government that believes in you, respects you and is accountable to you. I hope to see the day when this happens .... I am not anti-Russian. I am pro-Russian, more pro-Russian than the regime that badly controls you today."Compare the above text by Ivashov, the impression that Speechwriter they have one for two hi
          2. +1
            2 October 2013 20: 08
            Quote: skif33
            then Russia would not be in first place in exports

            -on the second. On the first - the United States, they are still significantly higher than Russia, unfortunately. And they have very solvent customers - Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Qatar, Australia and someone else there.
          3. +1
            3 October 2013 06: 08
            Do you really consider yourself more knowledgeable than L.G. Ivashov? or smarter than the Head of the Academy of Geopolitical Issues? Ivashov is a very reasonable person, and his opinion is worth listening to ... hi
        3. -1
          2 October 2013 18: 21
          Quote: a52333
          Ivashov’s brain periodically turns off. But publishes his opinion regularly.

          Quote: a52333
          Now in a state of "brain OFF" what did you write?

          Excuse me, but this is your "mozkh" not to turn on! Do you feel reality at all, or are you in prostration ?? It’s time to take off the pink glasses, and that’s all ... the Kremlin and Putin are living. And the country is bending!
          1. 0
            3 October 2013 17: 13
            Have you tried to include your own?
            China has removed Britain from the fifth largest arms exporter, according to a report released on Monday by the Stockholm Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Interfax reports.
            The first place in the export of arms from 2008 to 2012 was taken by the United States. They account for about 30% of world arms exports.
            In second place is Russia with an indicator of 26%. India has become the largest importer of Russian weapons; China, Algeria, Vietnam and Venezuela are also among the five largest importers of Russian military equipment.
            In the list of the largest arms exporters, Russia is followed by Germany and France with 7% and 6% respectively.
            Finally, China, for the first time since the end of the Cold War, managed to take fifth place among the largest arms exporters with a share of 5% of world arms exports.
            According to SIPRI, over the five-year period considered in the report, the volume of exports of Chinese weapons increased by 162%. The largest buyer of Chinese weapons was Pakistan, which accounts for 55% of arms exports from China.
            China has taken the place of Great Britain, which for the first time since 1950 has not entered the top five largest exporters of military equipment in the world.
            It is noteworthy that in the period from 2008 to 2012 of the year, the countries of Asia and Oceania accounted for about 47% of arms imports, and all five largest importers of arms are in Asia. These are India with 12% of world arms imports, China with 6%, Pakistan and South Korea, which account for 5%, and Singapore with 4%.
            1. 0
              3 October 2013 17: 15
              2008 - 2010 year!
        4. +4
          2 October 2013 19: 20
          Quote: a52333
          Leonid Grigorievich, now the president is no longer Medvedev.


          And the Minister of Defense is not Serdyukov, in which the influence of the Israeli and Zionist lobby in the Defense Ministry is just going through the roof. The lobbyists of the Israeli lobby, both in Russia and in other countries, are not necessarily Jews, but civil servants who receive benefits from the lobby either in the form of money, or appointment or concealment of crimes committed in public office.
          1. 0
            3 October 2013 01: 06
            Quote: Ascetic

            But the Minister of Defense is not Serdyukov, in which the influence of the Israeli and Zionist lobby in the Defense Ministry simply went wild ..

            I don’t know about the lobby, but Israeli and Zionist are one and the same. For Israel is a Zionist state in its essence and any Jew living in it from the prime minister to the janitor are Zionists, even if they don’t think about it at all.
        5. +2
          2 October 2013 19: 59
          Quote: a52333
          Leonid Grigorievich, now the president is no longer Medvedev

          As if Russia made it easier.
      2. +2
        2 October 2013 17: 08
        C-300 from where in Syria? It seems that all of ours have already admitted that they delayed deliveries ...
        1. 0
          2 October 2013 21: 25
          Quote: torry
          C-300 from where in Syria? It seems that all of ours have already admitted that they delayed deliveries ...


          Well, some of our members of the forum there have already sent poplar-m. Do not bother comrades dreaming wassat
      3. 0
        2 October 2013 21: 38
        I wonder where we will break through - the establishment is under the Americans, the economy is under them, we keep the money in their banks. Name at least one ruler to keep "money" in other people's chests. It turns out and we trade at their behest. I am silent about the subsoil - most of everything is mined by foreign companies. They did not notice how we were sold, but we all consider slaves not we. Gazprom is a national treasure, whose question is it?
    2. +3
      2 October 2013 21: 34
      Quote: Oberst_71
      About arms control and so it is visible. as soon as we are going to sell something to the Arabs, then the Jews fly in and that's it !. Already no one is selling to anyone. And the damage is billions of rubles. Who will answer?


      Article button accordion. Re-posted.

      If the Jews controlled our arms export, then all the money would have sailed to Israel.
  2. +11
    2 October 2013 07: 50
    Is this not a crime? This is not a betrayal of the homeland? This is a betrayal of the homeland, you cannot call it any other way.
    All things and actions are called by their names, it remains only to understand, and WHO is able to change the situation ...
    1. +1
      2 October 2013 09: 27
      Stalin would have changed the situation.
      1. +2
        2 October 2013 09: 35
        A plus. Stalin would not have allowed such a situation.
        1. 0
          2 October 2013 23: 23
          All right ..! A court of three judges and shooting in the basement. Plus the confiscation of all property and the loss of the rights of the whole family.
    2. +1
      2 October 2013 10: 25
      Quote: svp67
      able to make a difference ...

      In our country, in our conditions. Only the President of the Russian Federation .V.V. Putin can change the situation. He has all the levers of power. If he wants, he can turn the tide.
      No one else. Let's hope for the best.

      The Ministry of Finance does not finance the contracts that the Ministry of Defense was ready to conclude, for example, with Mig. Doesn't finance just

      The entire government, plush is a complete betrayal of Russian interests.
      V.Vladimirovich, without changing this anti-people government, there will be no progress in the social sphere or in the economy. The choice is yours.
      Russian interests.
      1. s1н7т
        +2
        2 October 2013 20: 55
        Quote: cosmos111
        Only the President of the Russian Federation can change the situation .V.V. Putin

        Change what I created myself? Do not tell my sneakers!) Putin is a man of the "family", he can change everything only for the worse.
    3. -1
      2 October 2013 10: 30
      from the Don.
      It seems to me that the hope is for the GDP, that with a change of power, he has a joker in his sleeve!
      1. Airman
        +5
        2 October 2013 11: 16
        Quote: borisjdin1957

        It seems to me that the hope is for the GDP, that with a change of power, he has a joker in his sleeve!

        Even if the blind can see, and the deaf hears the demand of the people to change the government, but the GDP does not, there is only one conclusion - this government suits him, because it dances to his tune. And about the "ignorance" of the GDP about the situation in the country I DO NOT BELIEVE!
        1. The comment was deleted.
  3. +3
    2 October 2013 07: 51
    Corruption is everywhere you look.
  4. +1
    2 October 2013 07: 57
    Insanity was strong ...
  5. +2
    2 October 2013 07: 59
    Our military-technical cooperation with these countries is fully controlled from Tel Aviv. This is another Ariel Sharon said, as Minister of Defense. Then, in my opinion, somewhere at the end of the 90's, he came as an inspector, sorted out who, what, whom you were teaching, and so on.


    Jews and Jews in Africa, where without them.

    So, in order for war not to take place, it is necessary to supply the appropriate weapons to Iran. This is our interest. Thus, we will move the threat away from the Caspian Sea, move the threat away from our borders, move millions of refugees to our country, and so on. But, you see, for some reason our national interests are not in the foreground.


    And in order to comply with our Russian interests and principles, it is necessary to push the Jews out of this market for the supply of our weapons to Iran. The task is not easy, but NECESSARY.
  6. +15
    2 October 2013 08: 13
    Too primitive. If Tel Aviv could have done so, Assad would have long followed Gaddafi and Hussein. It’s a lot more complicated here. In politics, trade is whiter than in another eastern bazaar. That's just who sells what and at what price, often remains a secret behind seven seals.
  7. ReifA
    +2
    2 October 2013 08: 19
    Russia sells where America "niasilila" and not only. Therefore, the "pointer" of America and others like them, what to sell to Russia and to whom, looks ridiculous, such was the opinion. Israel and the S-300. How many Israelis flew to bow to Russia, begged, the author probably forgot a little. + Leonid Ivashov himself is a little nervous, judging by the emotionality of what he wrote, IMHO.
  8. +3
    2 October 2013 08: 26
    Therefore, we must admit, it’s better then, to open a branch of the Israeli Ministry of Defense or the Ministry of Commerce,

    And it’s easy to pick up staff - even in the State Duma, representatives are with Israeli passports!
  9. +2
    2 October 2013 08: 45
    and all this is in the country because there is no statesman at the helm of the state
  10. +7
    2 October 2013 08: 56
    And again "academician" Ivashov. And again the Jews, the corrupt Poghosyan, all "pribali" (in the original, respectively, "lost"), "but I warned you" .... And the main trump card, of course, is that Syria cannot be surrendered. The general has an autumn aggravation. Well, how can he know all the political games in the current situation? Well, he does not have access to information of this level and cannot be. To make a clever face and broadcast common truths and his own inventions, passing them off as a "thorough" analysis, he had long learned. "Head of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems Leonid Ivashov" - what's this? I have the impression that Ivashov is the only member of this "Academy". And his articles are monotonous and dull ...
  11. +3
    2 October 2013 08: 56
    The supply of S-300 to Iran could cause immediate aggression by the United States and Israel. At the same time, the personnel serving the air defense system will not have time to properly train, keeping Russian specialists in the war is also not the best option and, as a result, the amers will have a chance to say that the S-300 is an outdated and low-power complex. We must start by teaching the Iranians how to work with air defense systems.
    1. +1
      2 October 2013 13: 28
      It seems that the topic of replacing the S-300 with the Antey-2500 was discussed.
  12. -2
    2 October 2013 08: 58
    Ivashova for the presidency! I do not see a more patriotic and understanding geopolitics in the vastness of Russia. And the situation is getting worse. war for water and air will soon begin. For oil and other things, they have long been conducted by the United States under the leadership of Israel. Well, say the nation! their Soviet Union saved from complete extermination and they are in every possible way spoiling the Slavs. It seems to me the time will come back in this century that some people will say Hitler was right about the Jews. And Zionism as an ideology many times surpasses it in cynicism of cruelty, treachery of arrogance of cunning in the same nationalism and threats to humanity.
  13. +2
    2 October 2013 09: 11
    Unfortunately, we inherited from the USSR the system of pushing "our" enterprises. Some praise Sukhoi's firm, others are trying to get MIG out of the hole. There is no one to objectively assess what the state needs, everyone pulls the blanket over himself.
    1. 0
      2 October 2013 21: 50
      There were at least specialists in the USSR, now only managers. Even we have a piss manager.
  14. -4
    2 October 2013 09: 20
    I agree with Mr. Ivashov. At all times in Russia, we harness for a long time ..... History lessons do not teach us!
    1. +5
      2 October 2013 09: 27
      Quote: nazgul-ishe
      The lessons of history do not teach us!

      Quote: Budilnik
      Ivashova for the presidency! I do not see a more patriotic and understanding geopolitics in the vastness of Russia.

      Why doesn't he teach? There is no need to canonize balabols who are trying to play on patriotism and quickly earn political capital for themselves. What "patriotic" and "understanding" Gorbachev and Yeltsin were — people were drooling with delight and emotion ... Talkers ...
      1. -1
        2 October 2013 22: 00
        So this is what it says - more noodles on the ears and everything will crawl through, nothing has changed. Yesterday - I’ll dunk in the outhouse, now - a question with an edge. And tomorrow? Everyday, all is well, a beautiful marquise.
  15. +5
    2 October 2013 09: 39
    And those who do this, they still hope to avoid punishment, to escape, to hide somewhere in the West. Firstly, let them look at all these defectors: they will give out, find and put to the wall for these things. I am convinced of this. And not in any century - in this decade will be.
    These words pleased. It’s high time that some politicians from politics were put up against the wall, shot, or at worst imprisoned for life, for others to think about. It's just that our politicians live by the principle: I live in a country that can and must be stolen, and my homeland is in another place on the globe.
    1. 0
      2 October 2013 19: 30
      they have a homeland where it’s warmer than the back seat, otherwise you might think that it’s just that a foreigner got us
  16. -1
    2 October 2013 09: 40
    Quote: IRBIS
    Quote: nazgul-ishe
    The lessons of history do not teach us!

    Quote: Budilnik
    Ivashova for the presidency! I do not see a more patriotic and understanding geopolitics in the vastness of Russia.

    Why doesn't he teach? There is no need to canonize balabols who are trying to play on patriotism and quickly earn political capital for themselves. What "patriotic" and "understanding" Gorbachev and Yeltsin were — people were drooling with delight and emotion ... Talkers ...

    What we want is what we have.
  17. Valery Neonov
    0
    2 October 2013 10: 13
    ... you need to put the appropriate weapons to Iran. This is our interest.- that means we will deliver, just to sort out the claims from Iran; Russia does not intend to surrender Syria, so Mr. Ivashov's "fears" are out of place ... hi
  18. +6
    2 October 2013 10: 26
    .
    Ivashov is Nemtsov from the army. Fuck to listen to him ?!
    Learn his biography ....
    .
    1. avt
      +4
      2 October 2013 10: 50
      Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
      Ivashov is Nemtsov from the army. Fuck to listen to him ?!
      Learn his biography ....
      And a little Nevzorov.
  19. +4
    2 October 2013 10: 28
    Israel is not controlling the arms trade in the Russian Federation, but the LION SHARE of BUSINESS AND FINANCE.
    + The lion's share of the media.
    I say, I was once in a synagogue on Maryina Roshcha (in Moscow), on a Jewish holiday, in the fall, when the old people are given something there, and almost everyone who came was with the packages "Union of Journalists".
  20. +3
    2 October 2013 11: 41
    Ivashov, in recent times began to weird. It really says the right things, then it’ll be crap out of school, at least stand, at least fall ...
  21. skif33
    +1
    2 October 2013 11: 50
    Quote: a52333
    Ivashov’s brain periodically turns off.

    He probably never turned on. If the US and Israel controlled the Russian arms trade, then Russia would not be in the first place in exports, but in the hundred and first. Citizen Ivashov needs to have a bite.
    1. +4
      2 October 2013 14: 00
      Quote: skif33
      Citizen Ivashov needs to have a bite.

      He, after the first, does not bite, does not want. After the second - it can’t, the age is not the same.
  22. Belogor
    0
    2 October 2013 12: 07
    I wonder who finances this Academy of Geopolitical Problems? This question always arises after reading their publications.
  23. 0
    2 October 2013 13: 20
    Ivashov is furious and understandable. He sees what is happening well, and sees the only explanation, in his opinion. But this explanation, unfortunately, is not the only one. Ivashov looks like the driver we've all seen. The same guy who growls furiously at the newbie (blonde girl) "What's so hard about that !!" Yes all. Everything is difficult for someone who cannot and cannot learn.
    Comrade Ivashov, they are not traitors. Well, that is - not all laughing It's just that their thinking, in comparison with yours, resembles the power of seven-year-old narrow-minded children. You see this in the institutes you visit, perspectives, directions, great products ... These people do not see anything there, because they do not understand. They are concerned only with concealing this utter misunderstanding of theirs, the terrible fact that they sat on top government posts without a tenth of the mind required for this. Therefore, they angrily suck their eyebrows and in those rare cases when they cannot get away from visiting all these incomprehensible institutions, they are "very unhappy". Since no one will bother the disgruntled bosses with incomprehensible conversations.
    And they turn to experts to explain to them. And then ... they cannot turn to you, comrade Ivashov. Because then you instantly calculate their intellectual ceiling ... They can appeal only to those who with a two percent guarantee will not chat. Who is it? Patriots of their country, honest people, rooting for her? So after all, they may well decide that a blockhead in a leadership position is a threat to the Motherland! (and they are, as it were, right) Who remains? Remain completely dependent on them ... shameless, unscrupulous, not having even a drop of patriotism thieves. Which deeply slander both the Motherland, and the government, and everything that does not prevent them from stealing.
    These guys tell the authorities - so give us these institutions! We will figure it out! And it begins .... Sometimes I think that the traitors are better, the damage from them is much less ....
    1. 0
      2 October 2013 22: 22
      No, not fools go to power, they just have a perverted mind. We think straightforwardly - good for the state, good for me. They are better for me than for the state. Another thing is that they look half-educated in our eyes, so maybe it's a joke, with a fool and there is no demand.
  24. faraon
    +5
    2 October 2013 13: 31
    I read the article, I didn’t understand and where does the USA and Israel, What kind of control are we talking about, are sovereign countries with their own economies and strategic plans. America cannot compete with Russia, realizing that even though it’s economically strong, it doesn’t take into account the opinion Russia can’t, what the latest events in Syria showed. How it can control the arms market of the Russian Federation. It’s the utopia of a respected academician. As for Israel, Yes, it’s a technologically advanced country that offers (sells) its technologies around the world, including and ro In 2010, an agreement was signed on the transfer of technology to UAVs, the first batch was assembled from Israeli components, all the technical documentation for this UAV model was transferred, specialists were trained in Israel, now everything is said to be in the hands of Russia. Accordingly, Russia went for some kind of concessions to Israel. Like the fact that they refused to supply strategic arms to Syria and Iran. But there are agreements between the two countries. So here is the betrayal of the interests of the Motherland. Tavrisch Ivashov clearly dramatizes the situation,
  25. Peaceful military
    -2
    2 October 2013 13: 37
    It is very sad to read all this.
    Gorlopany grief hurray-patriots, ala football fans grief, tearing throat "Russia forward, we will tear everyone!" and put downsides to this article.
    Of course RUSSIA FORWARD! But read these lines:
    Therefore, it is difficult to talk about defense and security today. On the one hand, there was hope that Sergei Kuzhugetovich would come and put things in order, and he began, but we see, but we see how everywhere, everywhere, they put obstacles.
    The Ministry of Finance does not finance the contracts that the Ministry of Defense was ready to conclude, for example, with Mig. Doesn't finance simply. This enterprise, which works for the defense industry, for our military-space industry, for the same Bulava, for our naval fleet, is working quite successfully, the Ministry of Defense is unable to defend, and there is no one else to defend. There is no one to protect in our country - everything is bought, everything is sold, and so on.
    This is very sad, but it should not be a sentence. To do this, we must stop being indifferent and actively express our civic position while supporting sound patriotic forces, such as air defense and GCD.
    1. Peaceful military
      -1
      2 October 2013 21: 13
      Gorlopany, grief hurray-patriots, a la football grief fans, tearing their throats "Russia forward, we will tear everyone!" put cons NOT ARGUMENTING... ignoramuses, howeverlaughing
      1. 0
        2 October 2013 21: 26
        What a curious word you used as a curse word. This word is used by very interesting people ....
        1. Peaceful military
          0
          2 October 2013 22: 06
          This word is used by very interesting people ...

          And what people the word I use (which, by the way?) hurts?smilehi
  26. +2
    2 October 2013 13: 55
    What then do our Russian Technologies do? They remove the directors, declare that all Russian Technologies enterprises should be profitable, and today they are already walking around, that it is necessary to build a shopping center on the basis of this unprofitable institution - tomorrow there will be profit. Is this not a crime? This is not a betrayal of the homeland? This is a betrayal of the homeland, you cannot call it any other way.

    If such an official as Leonid Ivashov cannot be courageous and express in an open letter to the President, then I don’t know who to hope for? Then it turns out that everything is so rotten that we have no future ..........
  27. honest jew
    +3
    2 October 2013 14: 38
    Quote: skif33
    If the US and Israel controlled the Russian arms trade, then Russia would not be in the first place in exports, but in the hundred and first.



    The first places are still unchanged. The leader is the USA with a market share of 30%, the second place in Russia is 26%. Then Germany (7%) and France (6%) go with a big lag. But instead of traditional Great Britain, China is now in fifth place with a share of global arms exports of 5%.
  28. Arabist
    +3
    2 October 2013 14: 44
    Again Ivashov. And the article is exactly the opposite of the previous one. What, they paid more here? Yes, this "patriot" comes out even more corrupt than I thought. Fair man? Well, go to Solovki!
  29. gameover65
    -2
    2 October 2013 14: 59
    I don’t really trust Ivashov, but with this:
    And the problems are created, in my opinion, by orders from Tel Aviv. Tel Aviv doesn’t want us to deliver to Iran, doesn’t want us to deliver to Syria, but here they simply take it under the hood and answer: “Yes!” That's all. Our military-technical cooperation with these countries is fully controlled from Tel Aviv.

    I can not agree.
    what is happening now? disarmament of Syria by the hands of Russia. for Syria, weapons of mass destruction, it’s like for Russia nuclear deterrence forces. Jews wake up that at the beginning of the attack on Syria, the Syrians will strike at them, so they came up with such a move. as soon as Syria disarm her kirdyk.
    and ours will say that they tried, they tried, but they just wanted the best, but it turned out as always.
    zh.i.dovskoe yoke in Russia!
    1. Arabist
      -1
      2 October 2013 15: 25
      And against whom would Syria use chemical weapons?
      1. gameover65
        -1
        2 October 2013 19: 22
        in the event of an attack, Syria would use WMDs, at least against Israel.
        so disarming Syria now is just playing for time and ensuring the safety of "God's chosen people."
        1. Arabist
          -1
          2 October 2013 19: 24
          Would apply. Are you nasty? A bad joke.
  30. 0
    2 October 2013 16: 08
    “I was at the International Nuclear Center in Dubna. You understand, they let me in - it’s international. The Americans dominate there today. We cannot, for the Ministry of Defense, not only nuclear, but also conventional weapons, projects of any kind, carry out without the permission of this international community. Well, what is this going on? The Ministry of Defense cannot sign a contract. "
    At the last air defense exercises in which I participated in 1975, a nuclear bomb was nevertheless dropped on Dubna. Our unit was located not far from Dubna, and therefore the exercises ended for us. The rest "fought" for several more days. wink soldier
    And now the Americans do not need nuclear weapons against us?
    1. Arabist
      +2
      2 October 2013 16: 14
      Yes, it’s just that Leonid once again felt like Leonid and decided to show how smart he is, understanding and suffering for Russia, although this is not close.
  31. chushoj
    0
    2 October 2013 17: 05
    They not only oversee the sale, but also keep an eye on the development of weapons. And this is much more important. It's time to take a break from your trough, who was put more in the bowl today. There is not only control over the development, but also over the growing personnel who have a chance to become designers - their activities are directed in the wrong direction. It is enough for a young armament specialist to "pull by the nose" for 5 years, and for the rest of his life all his abilities will go down the drain. This is Yeltsin's legacy.
  32. +5
    2 October 2013 18: 30
    The article is a set of nonsense starting in Ivashov, depending on the time of year or lack of vitamins. Not further. as 3 days ago there was absolutely the opposite article signed by him. I don’t even want to leave comments on this nonsense. And from all these pseudo-academies with a single employee and academician in one person - already sick. Do not look at any program. there is sure to be another academician in it, the head of an institute or academy with a name that can hardly fit into 4 lines. And this is nonsense. what do you think . escaped from a closed dispensary or treated on an outpatient basis?
    Kakademiki !!!!
  33. honest jew
    +3
    2 October 2013 19: 42
    Head of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems Leonid Ivashov


    The All-Russian Public Organization "Academy for Security, Defense and Law Enforcement" (ABOP) is a public organization that existed in Russia in 2000-2008. It was liquidated on December 10, 2008 by a decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, upheld by the cassation court on February 19, 2009. According to a court decision, the organization illegally issued professors, corresponding members, and academicians that looked like state certificates.

    Among the numerous awards established by the organization were orders named after Peter the Great, Alexander Nevsky, Catherine the Great (all three degrees), George Zhukov, Yuri Andropov, Mikhail Lomonosov, Admiral Kuznetsov, Nikolai Pirogov, as well as the Order of Great Victory and " Patron of Russia. " The organization also awarded prizes with medals named after Yuri Andropov, George Zhukov, Mikhail Lomonosov, Peter the Great.

    The organization also awarded the honorary titles “Honored Worker of Science ABOP” and “Honored Lawyer of ABOP” with the presentation of the corresponding badges and certificates.

    The report of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation says: “... In particular, ABOP and the National Committee, contrary to the current legislation, established 73 types of state decorations that are identical to those of the state, including orders, medals, badges, and also established degrees, introduced uniforms similar to military uniforms , as well as military ranks ... " “... Samples of diplomas and certificates issued by the Academy are similar to state diplomas and certificates, which does not exclude their use as such ...” All this, according to the prosecutor's office: "... creates the conditions for corruption and discredits the government ...".
  34. Ivan Denikin
    0
    3 October 2013 00: 05
    good article, in my opinion, the cry of the heart of a professional. in ukraine the same thing is happening. "Ukroboronprom" and "Ukrspetsexport" are headed by dudes who report to the "Mossad" and the CIA. many of them wrote as advisers and deputies. all contracts go through the Jewish Masons. that's terrible. even there are homosexuals, who are intermediaries of Ukrainian pounds with Americans and Jews, that's what they have lived to see.
  35. 0
    3 October 2013 08: 27
    Judging by the minuses, someone doesn’t like something! But after carefully reading the article and comments everything falls into place: it seems that the article is not Ivashov or someone edited (castrated) in the right direction. Pay attention to some points of elementary illiteracy, I haven’t found such turns of speech in articles before! What else catches the eye is that the article seemed to be translated from Russian into English, and then from English into Russian. All this is strange and looks like a provocative attempt to discredit a smart and decent general. Yes, he who has eyes will see!
  36. skif33
    0
    3 October 2013 14: 32
    Quote: aksakal
    on the second. At the first - the USA, they are still significantly higher than Russia
    I do not deny. But if you take away the American "gifts"
    and the mandatory "sell-off" to the NATA and Pacific Rim countries is debatable.
  37. i-gor63
    0
    3 October 2013 17: 46
    Ivashov has a lot of empty gap. Not so simple and not so bad.