Is Russia again trying to become a world gendarme? ("JOL Presse", France)

41
Is Russia again trying to become a world gendarme? ("JOL Presse", France)Chemical weapon in Syria was the reason for the large-scale changes in the balance of power around the world? It is precisely this impression that has emerged in recent days with many observers and the media. The “retreat” of Barack Obama and Francois Hollande in the matter of military intervention and the diplomatic consensus proposed by Vladimir Putin put Russia at the center of attention. Perhaps she becomes a new "world gendarme"?

“The retreat with his head held high - this is how Le Figaro described the support of France and Germany to Russia's proposal to transfer the Syrian chemical arsenal under international control with its subsequent elimination:“ In some cases, the art of diplomacy is to save a person. The fighters Barack Obama and Francois Hollande with amazing speed seized upon the opportunity offered by Russia. But can you blame them for it? Even in the end, all this will turn out to be a dry and dead branch, it is enough to get out of the quagmire in which they found themselves to be their own fault. ”

Putin hurry to help the West

11 September, when the Americans and the French accepted the principle of a sweetheart agreement to "punish" the regime of Bashar al-Assad, who in the West is accused of chemical attack 21 of August, the French press in one voice dubbed the reaction of Paris and Washington "retreat".

“The idea proposed by Putin makes it possible in the first place to unclench the clutches around Damascus and weaken the already shaky determination of the French and American commanders,” writes Libération. “Putin understood very well that Obama could take his proposal as an opportunity to save face in the face of non-acceptance of the operation in Syria in public opinion and indecision in the US Congress.”
“Putin made a brilliant move,” says Le Midi Libre. - He not only strengthens Russia's position in the political game in the Arab world, but also suddenly becomes the savior of the world who did not allow war. It is difficult after this to seriously consider the use of force. In addition, sincere this initiative or not, but it was approved by the main actors. "

Diplomacy against weapons

When the West goes through the back door, through the front comes to someone else, and in the Syrian issue Russia (perhaps herself unwillingly) workshop held true combination.

The West behaves extremely belligerently and is not ready to negotiate with the “monster” Assad. And then peace-loving Russians appear at a crucial moment with a compromise in their hands, which, as soon as Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov presents it to the public, admires all the actors, starting with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Everyone seems to forget that the game of Russia from the very beginning of the conflict was invariably aimed at finding a political solution ... But what difference does it make? Russia emerged victorious from a duel with the eternal American enemy. The balance on planet Earth is shifting to the east, and the cards are going to a new distribution. The last few days, the media are actively discussing the new trend: will Russia become a new world gendarme?

Russia has no imperial ambitions

The site Rue89 tried to give an explanation for the sharp rise in the power of Russia, which in just a few years had overcome the path from the thaw to diplomatic victories. Astounding story Vladimir Putin, a former KGB officer who has been at the head of this mysterious Russia for 13 for years, “including the period when he was Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev,” Rue89 said. To reach a key position, "which belonged to the country during the Soviet period (...), the Russian president relied on three main points: an aggressive foreign policy, an authoritarian domestic policy and a strong personal image."

Nevertheless, as Rue89 notes, “Vladimir Putin is not driven by the imperial ambitions of the USSR, and he does not export the social model. There are no former opportunities at its disposal when the Soviet Union supported the Cuban revolution, the African and Asian regimes, and wiped the United States in the nuclear field. (...) However, Boris Yeltsin’s successor became the author of the “Russian Renaissance”, establishing a number of new alliances: with still communist China, with the developing BRICS powers, such as Brazil and India, and states that are rising against the new world order with the American domination ".

Today, Russia offers a new path, different from democratic imperialism and the West-centric world order. “In part, this strategy is built on an anti-American and generally anti-Western stance,” writes Rue89. As noted on the site, this strategy made Russia "a natural ally of all those who believe that the domination of the West has dragged on too long, and that its weakening after the 2008 crisis of the year represents a long-awaited opportunity to put an end to it".

Vladimir Putin becomes "peacemaker"

Whether it is about restoring the power of Russia in the international arena, which underestimated France and the U.S.? This is the conclusion Rue89. In any case, in the Syrian issue Russia offered a way out of the impasse, writes in his blog Ryufol Ivan (Ivan Rioufol):

“Barack Obama and Francois Hollande had nothing to do in this civil war, because their intervention threatened only to complicate the lives of the Christians protected by Asad. Both of them owe much to Vladimir Putin, who on Monday offered to transfer the illegal Syrian arsenal under international control and thus made the prospect of military strikes unlikely. ”


"This turn of events turns the Russian president into a peacemaker and seriously strengthens his position towards the United States,"
- emphasizes the journalist, predicting "a change in the balance of power in relations between Russia and the West."

Be that as it may, in the first place “the fiasco of the Franco-American adventure means the end of the rule of the West in the international arena. If you think this is even for the better. The rise of the developing powers means that the West is no longer alone in the world. The US must give up its claim to the status of a world gendarme. As for France, it needs to recognize that its capabilities no longer correspond to the dreams of greatness. The punitive expedition was really just a snag, designed to conceal the strongest internal weakness. The priority of the West today is not to disperse its strength, but, on the contrary, to restore them on its own territory. ”

Multipolar world

So maybe the new cold war is starting? This is the question that the Lebanese newspaper L'Orient Le Jour raises.

“Everything leads to just such a thought. Russia is no longer a “colossus on clay feet,” but a full-fledged power, which is experiencing a boom and strengthens its position in the international arena, the newspaper writes. - It has become noticeable by no means now. (...) It was possible to start with an analysis of international relations in which the United States ceased to be the only superpower, along with their European followers. The confusion of the United States is due to the fact that they now have to share the world with another bloc, the BRICS, of which Russia is the cornerstone. ”


A multipolar world is taking shape on our planet, says L'Orient Le Jour: “In the future, it will be impossible to do anything without taking into account the position of Russia and BRICS. The new world order, of course, does not like the United States, because they are no longer the absolute master in the world and can not act on the international arena without taking into account the interests of the gaining powers. ”

"America is above all"

But how will the Americans accept this “new world order”? Someone succumbs to nostalgia, and someone on the contrary pragmatically approaches the situation.

La Voix de la Russie quotes American politician Patrick Buchanan, who on the eve of the 2012 elections of the year noted that America no longer needs “neo-imperial nonsense”

“Our country is embraced by biblical complacency. America needs a new foreign policy that is based on the realities of the modern world, and not the remnants of the Cold War and the dreams of democracy, he said. - We need to again be guided by the slogan "America is above all." For us, it does not really matter what is going on in the rest of the world, because we must adhere to enlightened nationalism. ”
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. serge-68-68
    +14
    16 September 2013 06: 21
    The title is incorrect. An international gendarme is both the ability and the willingness to use force when necessary. Russia is deprived of all this. It should be called "Russia is trying to become the conscience of the world" - but this, of course, is too much.
    It is more correct to say that Russia is trying to enter the world stage using available means - diplomacy. The output this time turned out spectacular and, most likely, effective. The real basis for a multipolar world, which everyone has been talking about for about 15 years, has finally appeared. Whether the Russian Federation is able to not lose enough unexpectedly acquired capital - we'll see.
    1. MG42
      +4
      16 September 2013 06: 31
      Is Russia again trying to become a world gendarme? ("JOL Presse", France)

      After the USSR ceased to exist and the Cold War ended, the role of the gendarme was played as before by the United States and the French did not particularly squeak about it ..

      Multipolar world
      So maybe a new cold war begins?

      The fact that the world has changed = fact, the US itself spat on the UN several times violated the veto unleashing wars, so the other poles did not put up with the outrage of such a world cop, and now the world is becoming a multipolar Russia + China as a counterweight to the USA, will there be a new cold war? she already invisibly started from the Syrian events ..
    2. +4
      16 September 2013 06: 34
      The “retreat” of Barack Obama and Francois Hollande on the issue of military intervention and the diplomatic consensus proposed by Vladimir Putin put Russia in the spotlight.

      The first time I read how The “OBLIGATION” of Barack Obama and Francois Hollande on the issue of military intervention and the diplomatic consensus proposed by Vladimir Putin put Russia in the spotlight.
      1. +7
        16 September 2013 06: 45
        The title is invalid. The international gendarme is both an opportunity and a willingness to use force when necessary. Russia is deprived of all this.


        Everything is correct. This is a French newspaper. In France, the word "gendarme" does not carry a negative connotation as it does in our country. There, on the contrary, it is to represent the rule of law, designed to protect the rule of law. So the French are essentially complimenting us ...
      2. +12
        16 September 2013 07: 58
        Giant of thought, father of (homosexual) European democracy. Do you seriously think that he is in danger of being "stupefied"?
        1. +3
          16 September 2013 09: 00
          Yes, it’s good to live with such an unmarked face of wisdom! At all times, fools were treated condescendingly.
          1. Hudo
            +2
            16 September 2013 09: 11
            Quote: omsbon
            At all times, fools were treated condescendingly.


            This is as long as he was engaged in his direct business - he amused the people. But when he tried to poke his unwashed nickel out of his business, he, as a rule, unceremoniously, was put in his stupid place.
          2. +1
            16 September 2013 11: 37
            Quote: omsbon
            Yes, it’s good to live with such an unmarked face of wisdom! At all times, fools were treated condescendingly.

            But this one, like a miracle, became the president of France! Apparently I caught a goldfish!
            Where the world is heading!
        2. 0
          16 September 2013 09: 40
          Quote: siber
          Do you seriously think that he is in danger of being "stupefied"?

          They say that "infection does not stick to infection." In this case, further dullness is clinical idiotism requiring hospitalization
        3. RA77
          +1
          16 September 2013 11: 16
          Oh damn it, please remove it someone !!! Today I read on RT that this amoeba Hollande does not stop all. Insists that the possibility of a military strike be provided for in the document of a resolution on Syria. The main thing is that the bitch himself is afraid of getting into a mess alone, only behind the back of the United States, but he wants all of a military strike. Pascuda. Probably the French themselves already hate it.
        4. +1
          16 September 2013 12: 24
          Quote: siber
          Giant of thought, father of (homosexual) European democracy. Do you seriously think that he is in danger of being "stupefied"?

          You are, however, a pessimist, I personally believe that human capabilities are not limited, especially in the process of further stupefaction !!!!
        5. Che
          Che
          0
          16 September 2013 18: 34
          Such a feeling - the dumber the better. But for whom. Puppeteers or something?
          Spengler read - Sunset of Europe.
    3. +2
      16 September 2013 07: 30
      Very correct. Exactly so, obviously the author wanted to say that Russia had power. Yes, it was able to influence the policy of the leading powers, but not by the military force of the "world gendarme", but by a successful diplomatic maneuver. Lavrov is a great fellow, I was always amazed, what a fine fellow he is!
      But Russia uses affordable means - that is, it acts as it should, correctly, wisely.
    4. +3
      16 September 2013 07: 58
      serge-68-68, you absolutely rightly noticed: it is "conscience". And this is not overkill. In many ways, for the West, our people are so mysterious, because we have a conscience, and we are often guided by it in making decisions, so that later we will not be ashamed. They do not understand this: how can you act in any situation without fully satisfying your selfish interests? At the same time, without squeezing the last of the one with whose help they make money.
      They never had a conscience. And partly, therefore, they have fagot and creeps out of all the cracks and into each crevice.
    5. 0
      16 September 2013 10: 02
      Quote: serge-68-68
      . The real basis for a multipolar world, which everyone has been talking about for 15 years, has finally appeared

      Is it good or bad, do you think, or is bipolar better?
      1. serge-68-68
        +1
        16 September 2013 13: 16
        "Bipolar" is a rather conventional name. Even in the best times of the USSR-USA, firstly, there was a bloc of non-aligned, and secondly, the leaders had to take into account and sometimes coordinate the interests of the satellites.
        I suppose that for the current state of the Russian Federation, a multipolar world is more profitable - the more players, the more difficult it is for them to conspire against one ... Banal calculation. :)
  2. +6
    16 September 2013 06: 27
    Is Russia again trying to become a world gendarme? ("JOL Presse", France)
    Not. There is the USA and NATO for this.
    Russia wants to become a good gentleman - an arbitrator.
    How are the classics?
    "When the master comes - the master will judge us"
    And it turns out. Hot heads cooled, besieged the impatient ...
    They also made it possible to preserve physics.
    1. +1
      16 September 2013 11: 01
      "When the master comes, the master will judge us." Doubtful argument for. In Nekrasov's poem, the master did not judge anything, only there was a lot of rent-seeking.
      After the collapse of the USSR, or rather, even earlier, because Gorbachev began, the country lost almost all friends, under the guidance of advisers from the states, traditional ties with other countries were turned off, they surrendered everything that supported the status of a great power. Strong support for Syria is necessary for both Syria and Russia itself, which means you can deal with it.
  3. +4
    16 September 2013 06: 27
    All of this is certainly correct, only
    illegal Syrian arsenal

    why not the American illegal nuclear arsenal ???
  4. +5
    16 September 2013 06: 29
    Not a gendarme, but an arbiter. The gendarmes love no one, and the referees are held in high esteem.
    1. Hudo
      +1
      16 September 2013 09: 18
      Quote: FC Skif
      Not a gendarme, but an arbiter. The gendarmes love no one, and the referees are held in high esteem.


      But how can I tell you, the phrase "The judge (in the sense of the arbiter) for soap" takes place. To be an arbiter in the international arena, you need to have a strong diplomatic corps (to write yellow cards) and a strong Army and Navy - to write out red cards for especially stupid and dull ones and others of the same kind.
  5. +3
    16 September 2013 06: 34
    Russia has shown that her intellect is significantly higher than that of France and the States, that is, significantly higher than the stool. Intellect in the international arena. And no gendarme. And in the West, some did not understand where they were sitting head over heels, and let out a break.
  6. Valery Neonov
    +3
    16 September 2013 06: 36
    hi "... at the decisive moment, peaceful Russians appear with a compromise in their hands ..."- that’s exactly what peace-loving; after all, in fact, none of those who wanted to bomb Syria did not offer anything but the use of force ... So there is nothing to blame for the mirror if the face is crooked! wink
    It's time to get used to the Anglo-Saxons that Russia will have to reckon with as in the days of the USSR. hi
    1. eplewke
      +1
      16 September 2013 11: 32
      Damn it, damn happy about the news! I don’t remember the last time I was so happy for my country and for my president! Ave Putin! Ave strategist!
  7. +3
    16 September 2013 06: 37
    Is Russia again trying to become a world gendarme?
    Someone must be a gendarme, if there is a bullish infinite tribe around. Russia will drive you to the stall.
  8. +6
    16 September 2013 06: 38
    Again, the paddlers say that Russia is becoming a full-fledged power, and Russia has not ceased to be French. Look at yourself better. You are no longer a power and your entire rear-wheel drive Europe, the used condom of America!
  9. +2
    16 September 2013 07: 15
    Is Russia again trying to become a world gendarme? ("JOL Presse", France)
    Well, not all of NATO and the United States alone, to protect their interests, it is time for Russia to declare its interests and show how it is ready and able to protect them ...
  10. +2
    16 September 2013 07: 18
    from the Don.
    The West will come to its senses for a long time and get used to new realities. Although many people cannot change their brains. They still live in the past century. what an interesting time! For foreign policy I am proud of Russia and GDP !!!
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. Old bear
    +2
    16 September 2013 07: 22
    Greetings to all members of the forum! First thoughts after reading the article, what if (God forbid) there was a calm in Syria before a big storm? No doubt the hotheads have been cooled down, but is this not just another trick designed to relax our diplomats? number of thrown on war. Everything is still very fragile and prone to any provocation that our "partners" will gladly accept. Here is another piece of news - the National Coalition of the opposition and revolutionary forces of Syria asked the world community to ban Bashar al-Assad from using military aircraft and ballistic missiles in cities. Agence France-Presse reported on 15 September.

    The rebels also want government forces to be prohibited from using tanks and other heavy equipment in human settlements. According to the opposition, these measures, together with the destruction of chemical weapons, will stop the mass killings of Syrians.
    As they say insanity grows stronger sad the next proposal to take any weapon from the army to distribute petroleum jelly and ban any resistance to wrestlers? Well, as they say there are no words.
  13. Belogor
    +2
    16 September 2013 07: 23
    The West is becoming smaller, except for the thirst for profit at the expense of other peoples and hypertrophied tolerance there is nothing for the soul.
  14. Valery Neonov
    0
    16 September 2013 07: 41
    Quote: Belogor
    The West is becoming smaller, except for the thirst for profit at the expense of other peoples and hypertrophied tolerance there is nothing for the soul.

    That's just tolerance for some reason is not to those ..., laughing and as for profit, here is really age-old hypertrophy. hi
    1. +3
      16 September 2013 08: 26
      quote- “The idea proposed by Putin allows first of all to unclench the clutches around Damascus and weaken the already shaken determination of the French and American commanders,” writes Libération. - Putin perfectly understood that Obama could accept his offer as an opportunity to save face in the face of rejection of the operation in Syria in public opinion and indecision in the American Congress. "

      that’s exactly what Vladimir Putin did. Now Obama owes his reputation only to him and to no one else.
    2. HAM
      +1
      16 September 2013 09: 48
      Well, you know that the fraera ruined ..
  15. +2
    16 September 2013 09: 08
    Obama should be grateful to Putin for the fact that he "preserved his image" in front of allies and in front of the whole world to him and his "tobacco" Olandu. Oland himself with his "military ambitions" does not mean anything even against Syria without the United States. But he also strongly wants to "go down in history."
    The “retreat” of Barack Obama and Francois Hollande on the issue of military intervention and the diplomatic consensus proposed by Vladimir Putin put Russia in the spotlight. Perhaps she becomes the new "world gendarme"?

    It seems to me that there is nothing insulting in comparison with the "world gendarme" for Russia. It's just the way of thinking of the West, they don't know how to think differently, if you look into their centuries-old history. The fact of recognition of Putin's merits makes the world look differently at external relations between countries, the onset of multipolarity:
    Be that as it may, first of all, “the fiasco of the Franco-American adventure means the end of the supremacy of the West in the international arena.” If you think about it, it’s even for the best. The rise of developing powers means that the West is no longer alone in the world. The United States must abandon claims to the status of world gendarme.
  16. +2
    16 September 2013 09: 17
    on the Syrian issue, Russia (maybe without wanting it) had a truly masterful combination.


    (+) smiled, "accidentally" so, the crisis was resolved and Obamka shit on his head, publicly, and an article in the New York Times is generally an accident.
    1. +1
      16 September 2013 09: 45
      Really. The best impromptu is prepared in advance. In world politics, such things "accidentally" do not happen all calculated and laid out on a silver platter at the most opportune moment.
      And the word "gendarme" does not fit Russia in any way. This is an American prerogative; peacemaking is more appropriate in this case.
  17. HAM
    +1
    16 September 2013 09: 37
    Unfortunately, France is turning into a sexless mongrel. At least its last steps (Libya, Syria) look just like that-bark louder than the owner.
  18. 0
    16 September 2013 09: 49
    Russia is not a gendarme and never will be. Originally, Russia is a peacemaker!
  19. +3
    16 September 2013 10: 10
    During the Cold War, only the power of the Soviet Union held back the US gendarmerie ambitions. After the collapse of the USSR, America completely unbelted. There was no longer any force in the world that could curb a potential aggressor. And the blood of the Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Egyptians flowed like a river ... the list is endless. All these troubles of the peoples were the result of the so-called "unipolar world", when one country, the United States, the world's gendarme, decided to whom, with the help of bombs and missiles, "bring" democracy. Events that unfold around Syria indicate that the times of a unipolar world are a thing of the past. The voices of Russia, China, and South American states are sounding louder on the world political arena. This is a good sign!
  20. 0
    16 September 2013 11: 27
    Yeah .... the foolishness of the French, something new was invented, otherwise the tsar also called the world gendarme ....
  21. +1
    16 September 2013 12: 10
    Kerry hurries to the rescue. laughing
  22. 0
    16 September 2013 19: 58
    11 September, when the Americans and the French accepted the principle of a sweetheart agreement to "punish" the regime of Bashar al-Assad, who in the West is accused of chemical attack 21 of August, the French press in one voice dubbed the reaction of Paris and Washington "retreat".

    The Yankees and the paddling pool imagined themselves to be the most intelligent, cunning and dexterous, gave a blunder and fell into their own trap. It’s too late to change the charges against Assad, and there’s nothing to punish him for.
    Chemical weapons are not democracy; you can see, touch and control them.
    This is how the watchdogs are cut, by the tail and by the corner.
    Obama would not hurt to take a vacation with grief, swim in the sea, sunbathe on the beach.
  23. Bashkaus
    0
    16 September 2013 22: 33
    I don’t know if my homeland is trying to become a world gendarme, or is simply defending itself from scumbag-chaos, but the likelihood that our friends from the 5th republic will capture strong lyuley is clearly increasing.
  24. kelevra
    0
    18 December 2013 19: 23
    Indeed, the title does not fit, Russia is simply tired of looking at the atrocities of America and decided to intervene more radically in the world order!