Military Review

World media and experts commented on the interview with Vladimir Putin

76
Russian President Vladimir Putin gave an interview to Channel One and the AP agency, in which he did not rule out that the Russian side would agree with the military operation in Syria, but stressed that the sanction to use weapons in the SAR can only give the UN Security Council. World media and political analysts commented on the words of the Russian leader.


British media reaction

The Independent newspaper highlighted Putin’s comments that Moscow “does not exclude” support for an international military operation if full-fledged evidence is presented to the UN Security Council and the world organization gives the green light to such measures. According to the publication, these words "will be considered as a conciliatory step in the run-up to the G-20 summit."

As noted, Putin “added that he considered the idea that the regime / president of Syria Bashar / Assad could have recruited sarin nerve agents or other chemical weapons” as “ridiculous”. “Putin said that it’s still too early to talk about possible actions of the Russian Federation if the United States attacks Syria,” noted the Independent. "However, the general tone of his comments paves the way for one-on-one talks with US President Barack Obama this week," she said.

The Daily Telegraph He called Putin’s words that the Russian Federation does not exclude its agreement with the military operation in the SAR, "a possible dramatic change in the Kremlin’s position on Syria." “Although it is unlikely that Russia will attack its Syrian ally, Putin’s comments will raise hopes among diplomats at the G20 summit, that the Kremlin can be persuaded to abandon the veto in the UN Security Council in voting on a military operation,” she writes.

According to the publication, despite all the pressing economic issues on the summit’s agenda, Putin’s and Obama’s speech on the Syrian issue “will be the most closely followed topic of the meeting.” "If it is destined to be mutual understanding on Syria, it will be developed at one-on-one meetings on the margins of the summit," it predicts, pointing to mediation options, in particular, German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

with the BBC drew attention to the "mostly very tough" position of the Russian leader in any military operation against Syria. “But President Putin left open a small chance of changing the Russian position — something he hadn’t done before,” the corporation said, speaking of words that support for measures “is not excluded” under certain conditions. According to her, "of course, this is a high bar", but opening up some room for maneuver.

Agency Reuterspeaking about Putin’s words that he is counting on negotiations with Obama on the margins of the G20 summit, said: “Putin’s comments seem to be aimed at demonstrating his readiness to preserve the constructive nature of Russian-American relations, despite Obama’s decision to abandon holding a bilateral meeting of leaders. "

Newspaper The Times also paid attention to the readiness of Putin to meet with Obama at the summit. According to her, in the light of the fact that “Washington took a step closer to approving the attacks unilaterally,” Putin was told in an interview with a “carefully coded message”: “he voiced a pragmatic and conciliatory note to Obama,” that Russia can approve a military operation with the support of the UN. "

All media stressed Putin’s warnings to the United States against the unilateral use of force against the SAR.

American expert does not hope that Russia will support a resolution on Syria in the UN Security Council

Professor of Columbia University Kimberly Martin (who until recently headed the Harriman Institute of Columbia University - one of the largest political science centers in the United States) highlighted the position of the President of Russia on Syria. She highlighted the words that "the use of means of mass destruction of people is a crime."

“President Putin said that he would consider whether Russia could support the UN Security Council resolution, which provides for the use of force against the regime of Bashar al-Assad, if there is convincing evidence of the use of chemical weapons. Arguments for strikes based only on wiretapping are not enough. The Russian leader proposes to wait for the results of the examination carried out at the site of the tragedy by UN inspectors, "said the professor.

However, Kimberly Martin "does not have high hopes for Russia's approval in the UN Security Council of attacking Syria."

Canadian TV: President of the Russian Federation warned the United States that it should not resort to action against Syria

Vladimir Putin "clearly warned" the United States that one should not resort to unilateral military action against Syria. This was emphasized today by leading Canadian TV companies CBC and CTV, commenting on the statements of the Russian leader in an interview with Channel One and the AP.

“According to President Putin,” CBC notes, “striking at Syrian targets will become an act of aggression. He called the West’s assertions that / Syrian President / Bashar Asad used chemical weapons against his people,“ ridiculous. ” If there is any evidence of chemical weapons used by the Syrian government army, they should be presented to the UN Security Council. And this evidence must be convincing, he added. "

“President Putin also said,” the TV company continues, “if such evidence is presented to the UN, then Russia will take decisive steps towards Syria. Some observers express the opinion that he may be leaving the door open for possible support of some sanctions The UN is against Syria. But now the Russian leader is taking a tough stance: he is not convinced that the Syrian regime used chemical weapons, as the West claims, and that Damascus should be punished for it. "

CTV also points out that President Putin "once again insistently demanded: before starting military actions / against Syria / Barack Obama must receive the approval of the UN Security Council." "He noted that even in the US there are experts who believe that the evidence presented by the Obama administration is not convincing, and does not exclude the possibility that the Syrian opposition held a provocative action trying to give the West a reason for military intervention," the broadcaster said.

Bulgarian political scientist: Putin’s arguments are strong, but are unlikely to be heard

Putin presented convincing arguments against the intentions of the US administration to launch a military operation in Syria. About this in an interview with the correspondent. ITAR-TASS was announced by well-known Bulgarian political scientist and sociologist, one of the founders of the Gallup International - Bulgaria company Kancho Stoychev.

The Bulgarian expert called the President’s statement on Syria “acute”, in which he accused US Secretary of State John Kerry of lying. "I am convinced that in this case Kerry’s lies are evident, because the belief that there are no representatives of Al-Qaida in Syria is untrue," said Stoychev.

“Another strong part of Vladimir Putin’s interview is the demand for convincing evidence of the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian authorities. These words should be taken seriously, because, in my opinion, Russia has reliable sources of information in Syria,” the political scientist said. in an interview with the President of Russia, this is a requirement for evidence of the participation of the official Syrian authorities in an attack against civilians using chemical weapons, in which Russia would support the Security Council resolution the United Nations on the use of military force. These are very strong moments in the statement of the Russian president. "

“Unfortunately, in my opinion, these demands / of the President of Russia / will not be heard. It is worth noting that not only Putin, but also other world leaders have a similar opinion. Moreover, according to recent studies, the majority of the US population is against this war,” - added a Bulgarian expert.
Originator:
http://www.itar-tass.com/c11/864866.html
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. VasDA
    VasDA 5 September 2013 07: 40
    24
    Once again he lit up a hornet's nest ... laughing Now, interpreters, sign language readers, interpreters will come out ... It’s for God, sometimes it seems that we need to speak with the West very monosyllabic so that they understand ... Type: I'm going, I'm sitting, I'm eating, etc. etc. And then there will be doubts about their adequacy ... KVM
    1. Crocodile
      Crocodile 5 September 2013 08: 33
      16
      Quote: VasDA
      Now interpreters, sign language readers, interpreters ...

      Everyone hears what he really wants to hear. GDP, as a good diplomat, has given room for action to the United States and Europeans - the ability to preserve the remnants of its popularity. At the moment, you can’t drive them into a corner very tightly - they may not be able to withstand someone’s nerves and start shooting. A bad world is better than a good quarrel, and while the diplomats are saying, the guns should be silent - which is good for us ...
      1. Mikhail3
        Mikhail3 5 September 2013 15: 30
        +2
        Putin wins time for Syria. Tears out day after day. Increments by the hour ... You are absolutely right, I think. It gives them a chance, demonstrates readiness for negotiations ...
        "Good diplomacy is good. Bad diplomacy ... also good, because if not diplomacy, then war, but war is bad." I don’t think we will be able to wrap everything up. But there are still chances to prepare better. And our VVP intends to pull everything into this matter until the very last second.
    2. artemiy
      artemiy 5 September 2013 08: 39
      +2
      The Yankees are dumb! If we attack only Alkaida!
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Lapotnik
      Lapotnik 5 September 2013 10: 23
      +4
      And what is there to interpret, everything is clear and understandable. Only amers are trying to interpret the words of the GDP in their own way, like he almost gave the green light to the intervention, but it was in vain that they lowered his limitations on this issue, and it is from them that the question arises - if Russia advocates military intervention, then against whom will it be directed?

      Amer themselves have come up with excuses, fantasies and follow them. Oh well.
      1. alex13-61
        alex13-61 5 September 2013 11: 01
        +3
        Quote: Lapotnik
        Russia will advocate military intervention, then against whom will it be directed?

        The pepper is clear: if the "opposition" arranged a provocation with chemical weapons, then they should be hammered. wink
      2. cdrt
        cdrt 5 September 2013 13: 20
        0
        Amer themselves have come up with excuses, fantasies and follow them. Oh well.

        Moreover, if you read the most respected newspapers in the states - NYT, WP, and especially comments on everything that is happening, then you can see quite clearly, and the population, and almost half of those holding power, are not at all sure that it is necessary to start a war.
        Apparently, the US Arab allies clearly "drew the line", or support for the rebels in Syria, or an alliance.
    5. Russ69
      Russ69 5 September 2013 11: 41
      10
      Quote: VasDA
      Now interpreters, sign language readers, interpreters will come out ..

      Somewhere, a year ago there was a report on REE-TV. GDP answered some stupid question and scratched his head before answering. Based on what, the correspondent concluded that the head was scratched not like before, which means there will no longer be democracy in the country ... smile My wife still remembers this incident. He will see that I am watching the news, and asks; "How did Putin itch?" ... smile
      1. kush62
        kush62 5 September 2013 13: 11
        +3
        asks; "How did Putin itch?"
        It's time to scratch in another place, so that they would understand - they were sent!
    6. Val_y
      Val_y 5 September 2013 13: 44
      +1
      So this is their essence, they are unicellular in 99% of cases fool and 1% who can interpret and listen (the task of 1% is to debilitate 99% and vparivat them everything you want).
  2. vasiliysxx
    vasiliysxx 5 September 2013 07: 43
    27
    Obama doesn’t want to talk face to face, even though the presidents, as well as people, you can get to the black tower behind closed doors. (I really want to repeat)
    1. afire
      afire 5 September 2013 08: 55
      10
      and get the ipon by throwing this black picket through yourself
      1. denson06
        denson06 5 September 2013 10: 40
        +3
        Quote: afire
        and get the ipon by throwing this black picket through yourself

        So ironically and categorically supplemented the thought of the interlocutor, Lieutenant General afire .. laughing
        But he said just like Marshal .. laughing good
      2. karbofos
        karbofos 5 September 2013 13: 50
        +1
        afire i patstalom. strongly said laughing sorry plus you can put one.
    2. Akhtuba73
      Akhtuba73 5 September 2013 09: 42
      +3
      Lay the ruberoid on the floor ...
    3. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 5 September 2013 09: 48
      10
      As a diplomat, Putin is stronger than Obama. Therefore, Obama is unlikely to discuss the topic of Syria tête-à-tête with the GDP, as he will arrange the snares and Obama will have nothing to clearly present in favor of his tough position. That does not go to dialogue. But Obama proposed to meet with the Rassian homosexuals, it’s like a balm on his heart.
      1. afire
        afire 5 September 2013 10: 45
        +2
        Quote: Black Colonel
        with rasseyskih
        .
        and how to understand this? didn’t get anything in the letters?
      2. cdrt
        cdrt 5 September 2013 13: 22
        +1
        How diplomat Putin is stronger than Obama

        Putin really now Bismarck recalls the year so in 1870.
      3. Check
        Check 5 September 2013 13: 45
        +2
        Good day!
        for me, Obama does not want to meet since he stupidly does not solve anything, everything is decided for him, and he is just a performer.
        Israel decided Qatar and the UAE paid. Obama fulfilled.
        What should he talk about GDP?
        it seems to me that everything has already been decided, but now they are playing the play, where the audience is the whole world.
        1. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 5 September 2013 15: 31
          +3
          Quote: Check
          Israel decided Qatar and the UAE paid. Obama fulfilled.

          Yes, I finally hu..yu without button accordion!
          Not a fig for a business - "I'll buy a war based on" All inclusive ""!
    4. xan
      xan 5 September 2013 12: 05
      +3
      Quote: vasiliysxx
      Obama doesn’t want to talk face to face, even though the presidents, as well as people, you can get to the black tower behind closed doors. (I really want to

      after the war 080808 read on the Internet open spaces a discussion of some article
      there one Georgian wrote that there was a rumor in Tbilisi that before the war Putin gave Lyuli Saakashvili in a literal sense of the word at some party in Kazakhstan
      maybe not lyuli, but obviously there was some kind of skirmish, and not in favor of Sahaki
    5. EtickayaSila
      EtickayaSila 5 September 2013 12: 14
      +2
      HaHaha, it’s really really interesting to take a look at it ... it’s a pity that the dream is impossible angry
    6. Val_y
      Val_y 5 September 2013 13: 48
      0
      Yes, not only to the tower, but also to the black currants, he knows that the GDP of the MS in combat sambo can fall on the ground, black board on the floor laughing Yes, and twist the black bent hands in the scrap ones, as then the shed will be wiped laughing
    7. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 5 September 2013 15: 33
      0
      Very much a different class. Not Putin’s caliber, the enemy will fall from the first click ...
  3. mak210
    mak210 5 September 2013 07: 45
    21
    Apparently the government has accurate information about Syria’s non-use of chemical weapons, and therefore makes such statements. And if applied: will we also take part in the swotting? And in the ground operation?

    In addition, the lack of information about the chemicals used is surprising. Syria has chemical weapons reserves and does not hide it, so there must be appropriate diagnostic tools. Such an analysis takes several minutes and does not require any qualifications: a pump and a test tube. If the test is positive, urgently introduce the antidote that is available on sarin (if it is sarin). Having the qualifications of a military chemist, I would be careful not to stand next to the injured without a full set of chemical protection: the exhaled breath of air, earth, dust may well contain a lethal dose. The affected people have an inadequate response to light, but here they lie in the sun itself. Very strange.
    1. LaGlobal
      LaGlobal 5 September 2013 08: 32
      +5
      Western statements that / the President of Syria / Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against his own people are "ridiculous". As Putin said


      I wonder how long the United States will act with impunity.

      - maybe I'll ask "like a child": but why can't this org. UN, move to another country, along with the monetary fund and other organizations ???

      PS and the end of the us would come!
      1. afire
        afire 5 September 2013 08: 56
        +3
        how can organizations controlled by the usa be transferred?)))
        1. LaGlobal
          LaGlobal 5 September 2013 11: 55
          +2
          Quote: afire
          how can organizations controlled by the usa be transferred?)))


          Yes, all this is clear. BUT I feel like it, it itches drinks
      2. Black Colonel
        Black Colonel 5 September 2013 10: 03
        +3
        For example, on about. New Earth?
    2. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 5 September 2013 08: 49
      +7
      Ghbdtn !! Here you miss or don’t notice one thing, Mr. Lavrov also spoke about it, Combat Poison Agent has distinct characteristics and it is not difficult to find them, If they are present it means they have used ammunition, And as far as the information skips so far it’s no longer looked like samopal , This very much worries the Yankees all this fuss is crashing down, Putin simply stated clearly give these testimonies and we will immediately think what to do, while judging by the information there is no such thing, Putin is right by and large, I wrote that they don’t hear us, but he makes you involuntarily look around to Russia this is also a small step to ensure that our interests are taken into account,
      1. baltika-18
        baltika-18 5 September 2013 08: 58
        +3
        Quote: igor.borov775
        I wrote that they don’t hear us, but it makes us involuntarily look back at Russia, this is also a small step towards taking our interests into account,

        It is unlikely that they are looking back. Two facts. The first delegation of the Federation Council was refused a meeting with congressmen.
        The second Lavrov refused to connect with Kerry by phone.
        1. igor.borov775
          igor.borov775 5 September 2013 10: 03
          +7
          Yes, don’t worry, in 2008 almost everyone in the UN did not pay attention to us, they were against us, but now they’re completely different, they don’t hear us, but they look around, Or they forgot how President Medvedev champed with Obama and was happy with the gift of IPhone, and at that time our arrests scouts How quickly it is forgotten, Now we are different and you won’t just throw us away, Yes Obama relies on his economy before they didn’t even look at us, but something still happens, And moreover, no more than a hundred states approve of them and it’s very disappointing to have to persuade to look for at least the slightest opportunity to win over to your side, the Yankees faced this and this is a completely different matter, I have to make excuses before this was not the case, we decided to spit on everyone, but here you need to maneuver, Didn’t you even notice this , Yes, the Yankees will use force, but escort on the world stage may be different, this is what worries them, and of course, Russia makes its contribution to this as far as its strengths are concerned, and its state interests appeared Really did not notice, But in vain
        2. cdrt
          cdrt 5 September 2013 13: 32
          0
          The second Lavrov refused to connect with Kerry by phone.

          You can’t say that Kerry is lying and call up right away.
          It does not happen wink
          neither in the ordinary world, nor in the diplomatic. Putin first crossed a protocol (regardless of the fact of the presence / absence of lies).
      2. 77bor1973
        77bor1973 5 September 2013 09: 24
        +1
        That's right, but was it generally a chemical warfare agent, and not "dichlorvos".
    3. fedorru
      fedorru 5 September 2013 10: 22
      +5
      Maybe we’ll take part in the operation. Only missiles will fly not through Assad’s army, but through militants.
    4. denson06
      denson06 5 September 2013 10: 45
      +4
      My comrade is a graduate of the Saratov Military Institute for Chemistry and Biology, also a military chemist and with serious experience .. so, when he saw the video, he immediately cited the same facts and said that this is a theatrical production of the "West", the purpose of which is to form public opinion and fool masses and off persons.
    5. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 5 September 2013 21: 15
      0
      Apparently the government has accurate information about Syria’s non-use of chemical weapons, and therefore makes such statements Even last year, there was an opinion that the Russian Federation could take control of the Syrian chemical weapons, I even thought that ours could publicly declare that they had already "taken away" Obama's chemical weapons and the problem was settled, but then this topic somehow faded away.
      That rzhaka will begin if it suddenly becomes clear that the C300 was delivered to Syria all this time, and vice versa, by definition, for a long time now, by definition, it’s simply NO
  4. Ivan79
    Ivan79 5 September 2013 07: 46
    +7
    Vladimir Vladimirovich, as usual - not in the eyebrow, but in the eye. Foreign media will hum for a long time ...
    1. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 5 September 2013 21: 18
      0
      Vladimir Vladimirovich, as usual - not in the eyebrow, but in the eye.
      Unfortunately, the world situation requires a "machine"
  5. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 5 September 2013 07: 47
    +7
    from Don. A 20-summit is one of the possibilities of the GDP to convince Obama not to unleash aggression against Syria. But, in my opinion, Barak bit his lot! He said: A:, you need to say: B :!
    1. alexng
      alexng 5 September 2013 11: 16
      +1
      Most likely, until they receive a "zapatka", they will not calm down, or rather they will rest.
  6. aksakal
    aksakal 5 September 2013 07: 51
    -10 qualifying.
    Heard and discuss only what they wanted to hear. They dream of "joining" Russia in a military action against their own ally - and in all seriousness they have already started laughing I don't understand Putin - why would such Freudian slips be allowed? Drain - Drain! And then, like a maid for marriage - "maybe I will, but maybe I won't." Have Western tolerasts picked up? I would have had less time with them am
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 5 September 2013 08: 06
      18
      And eat a fish ... Although how to look. This is not a reservation. Like, you’ll prove that I’ll walk this girl with you. And it’s unrealistic to prove, everyone knows who has the stigma in the cannon. This is an eye-catching game. He’s a GBeshnik, it’s not customary to play with open cards.
    2. lewerlin53rus
      lewerlin53rus 5 September 2013 08: 12
      18
      Quote: aksakal
      I do not understand Putin - why should such reservations on Freud be allowed?

      Putin generously gives Batraq Abram the opportunity to save face and not plunge into Syria. Diplomacy, however.
      1. SPACE
        SPACE 5 September 2013 20: 52
        0
        Quote: lewerlin53rus
        Putin generously gives Batraq Abram the opportunity to save face and not plunge into Syria. Diplomacy, however.

        Of course, but will they understand his generosity? Yes, and why drive the rat into a corner and provoke it, it is better to let it go and let it die on its own. But I believe that there is something else in the words of GDP, this is an alternative opportunity and an attempt to go to the world with the aim of delaying the decision on the strike and, therefore, to get extra time ...
    3. Crocodile
      Crocodile 5 September 2013 08: 39
      +7
      Quote: aksakal
      I don't understand Putin - why would such Freudian slips be allowed? Drain - Drain! And then, as a maid for marriage - "maybe I will, but maybe I won't." Have Western tolerasts picked up?

      While draining it is a little like. Rather, there is some kind of lethal information that amers will be very difficult to kill! And no one canceled the amendment for the mysterious Russian soul! what The main thing is not to lose the information war!
    4. tungus
      tungus 5 September 2013 08: 59
      16
      Quote: aksakal
      I do not understand Putin - why should such reservations on Freud be allowed? You merge - merge! And then, like a wench

      Newspapers cite only the first part of Putin’s remark and in no way comment on the second. When asked by the journalist whether Russia will take part in the war against Assad, if it is proved that the chem. he used weapons, Putin did not rule out this possibility, saying that he considers the use of weapons of mass destruction against civilians to be inadmissible. Then he added that he was convinced that Assad simply had no reason to use chemical weapons, but the militants had a reason for this. And he asked what the Americans would do if it was proved to be a chem. guns used by militants? Who will they bomb then? And what will those who arms and finance the militants do in this case?
      In general, this was the answer to a provocative question, and the answer was in the case. Well, when Putin convicted Keri of a lie, and all over the world, he did not leave amers any hope of at least some kind of change in our position. For those who do not understand, the accusation of lying a second person in the state is in politics akin to declaring war. In fact, Putin burned down the bridges. Well, and again, the nomination of the BDK to Tartus speaks for itself.
      1. Black Colonel
        Black Colonel 5 September 2013 11: 27
        +2
        "... that was the answer to a provocative question."
        The answer was also provocative (reap what you sow). The GDP is able to conduct a diologist with opponents. good
  7. Floock
    Floock 5 September 2013 08: 06
    +6
    It's all bullshit. Putin knows that the possible "evidence" will not hold water. So he backed down a little so that Obama would not seem completely helpless in case of something. :)
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 5 September 2013 11: 45
      +3
      Quote: Floock
      So he passed a little back so that Obama, in which case, does not seem completely helpless. :)

      In politics, the enemy must be given the opportunity to retreat without losing his face.
  8. engineer74
    engineer74 5 September 2013 08: 12
    10
    Western interpreters of Putin's words are striking in their naivety! The GDP did not say against whom Russia would support the military operation, if it is proved that the opposition applied chemistry, then everything will fall into place.
    IMHO.
  9. StrateG
    StrateG 5 September 2013 08: 19
    +7
    Putin only spoke out that if Assad’s guilt was proved, he would loosen his grip. However, he noted that the evidence must be convincing. The whole point is that the West is unlikely to provide him with such evidence. And therefore, I believe that no changes are expected in the position of Russia.
  10. Egen
    Egen 5 September 2013 08: 28
    0
    "Putin said that it is still" too early to talk about the possible actions of the Russian Federation if the US attacks Syria,
    - these are the times, and when it will be "not early", as with Libya?
    1. afire
      afire 5 September 2013 09: 04
      +7
      it may be too early because Syria has something that should stop hotheads and then Russia's obvious intervention will not be necessary yes
      1. VDV 80-82
        VDV 80-82 5 September 2013 09: 34
        +6
        yes ... both Putin and Assad are suspiciously calm. We can prepare some surprises for the "empire of good."
    2. Russ69
      Russ69 5 September 2013 11: 47
      0
      Quote: Egen
      Putin said that it is still "too early to talk about the possible actions of the Russian Federation if the US attacks Syria - these are the times, and when it will be" not too early ", as with Libya?

      And why put all the trump cards at once.
      Yesterday, in an Arab newspaper, they wrote that Putin signed a decree on Tuesday to attack Saudi Arabia in the event of an attack on Syria ... smile
      1. afire
        afire 5 September 2013 15: 40
        0
        Doesn’t it seem strange to you that such a decree is not on the Kremlin’s website?
        who are the distributors of Putin signing a decree to attack the Saudis -

        1) Domain Name: JOINFO.COM
        Name Servers:
        ns1.imena.com.ua
        .... / server is in Ukraine
        ns2.imena.com.ua
        ns3.imena.com.ua
        Registrant Contact Details:
        Private person 00889
        Vitalij Nebylica (@ list.ru)
        ul. Verkhnjaja, 3, kv. 26
        Kiev, 01011
        UA Tel. +380.2098411

        2) Domain Name: GEWORLD.NET
        Name Server: NS1.SERV.GE
        .... / server is in Georgia
        Name Server: NS2.SERV.GE
        Administrative Contact:
        Irakli Nozadze (@ intellcom.net)
        995.32757897
        Intellcom Ltd.
        varketili, zemo plato 51a
        Tbilisi, TBILISI 380008
        GE

        3) Domain Name: ADAMALLA.COM
        Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
        Admin Name: Registration Private
        Admin Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
        Admin Street: DomainsByProxy.com
        Admin Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
        Admin City: Scottsdale
        .... / server is in the usa
        Admin State / Province: Arizona
        Admin Postal Code: 85260
        Admin Country: United States
        Admin Phone: (480) 624-2599
        Admin Fax: (480) 624-2598
        Admin Email: @ domainsbyproxy.com

        4) Domain ID: D155469497-LROR
        Domain Name: ODNAKO.ORG
        Created On: 26-Feb-2009 10:09:27 UTC
        Last Updated On: 19-Apr-2013 00:20:28 UTC
        Expiration Date: 26-Feb-2015 10:09:27 UTC
        .... / server is in the usa
        Sponsoring Registrar: PDR Ltd. d / b / a PublicDomainRegistry.com (R27-LROR)

        DO NOT LOOK AT THIS Nonsense, IT WOULD BE AGGRESSION, only on our part, which is unacceptable
  11. 128mgb
    128mgb 5 September 2013 08: 31
    +7
    Russian President Vladimir Putin gave an interview to Channel One and the AP agency, in which he did not rule out that the Russian side would agree to a military operation in Syria, but stressed that only the UN Security Council could authorize the use of weapons in the ATS.
    If the UN gives sanction, if the Moon falls to the Earth, if the Sun goes out .. In this case, Russia will help to bomb Syria. And Western journalists should learn Russian, and not blurt out that without hitting.
  12. ed65b
    ed65b 5 September 2013 08: 34
    +3
    Words about supporting the Russian operation against Assad are taken out of context, Putin made it clear that those who used the chemical. weapons should be punished, and also noted that if this is the opposition then will the US bomb it? And Qatar, the Saudis and the Turks will continue to supply them with weapons? Putin is clearly convinced that this is not Assad, but an opposition provocation. And in him it was possible to make any statements on this subject, even to use nuclear weapons. Analysis of components will easily show the country of production and it will not be the USSR and Syria.
    1. afire
      afire 5 September 2013 09: 06
      +4
      knowing these barbarians, they could well have found sarin made in the USSR, but there’s no bald one on the black market
  13. pensioner
    pensioner 5 September 2013 08: 38
    11
    The Daily Telegraph called Putin's words that the Russian Federation does not rule out its consent to the military operation in the SAR, "a possible drastic change in the Kremlin's position on Syria." "While it is unlikely that Russia will attack its Syrian ally, Putin's comments will raise hopes among diplomats at the GXNUMX summit that the Kremlin can be persuaded to abandon the UN Security Council veto on the military operation," she writes.
    For some reason, no one noticed that Putin dropped the phrase that Russia has options for armed response to events. So briefly, without accenting, but you dropped it! What did he mean, no one knows of course. But he is such a person that he just doesn’t say anything, he doesn’t even remove the dust particles from his suit ...
    1. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 5 September 2013 11: 32
      +4
      "For some reason, no one noticed that Putin dropped the phrase that Russia has options for an armed response to events."
      In whose address he dropped, they probably noticed and correctly understood what GDP wanted to say. am
  14. fzr1000
    fzr1000 5 September 2013 09: 29
    +2
    Russia has developed a predominantly negative image abroad. Most of all, they dislike our country in Israel (77% of negative assessments), Jordan (70%), Turkey (66%), France, Japan and Egypt (64% each). This is evidenced by the results of a survey by the Pew Research Center, writes Kommersant.
    According to the results of the survey, it was possible to find out that in general, 39% of respondents have a negative attitude towards our country, and 36% are positive. Positive feedback from the Russian Federation was awarded only in Greece (63%) and South Korea (53%).

    In the USA, a break has been outlined: 43% of Americans feel negative, 37% of respondents sympathize with us. Despite the geographical proximity, European countries emotionally fenced off from Russia: more than half of the population of Germany, Italy and Poland have a negative attitude to the eastern neighbor.

    And here's what about the United States, what about Germany ... the same thing. There are plenty of other worries and thoughts. Well, maybe they have nothing else to do, so they "treat" Russia badly.
    And yet, it seems to me that Kommersant prints such materials on purpose. It seems as if he is just giving information, and he himself has nothing to do with it, but the sediment remains from such "publications".
    1. goldfinger
      goldfinger 5 September 2013 09: 58
      +1
      The explanation is very simple - "living in a glass house, do not throw stones at your neighbors." Pindo stan, Geyropa, zh idy are frequent words in Runet. And they are read not only in Russia. And by reading, they draw conclusions. May be wrong. Help them figure it out so that they understand that Russia is "white and fluffy". If you still have a "sediment". By the way, we have the same sediment, from "we feed you", "frost-resistant Tajiks", "bulbashi", etc. And if you are of the same name, as you gracefully put it, continue in the same spirit.
      1. Stas
        Stas 5 September 2013 11: 30
        +2
        goldfinger

        You are only partly right. Actually, the Russian people have seen enough of the peddlers of "democracy", family values ​​and other delights of Western "civilization". Most of the Russian people have made the right conclusions and call everything by its proper names: white-white, black-black, and terrorists-bandits. And we are not going to bend under anyone, let the world bend under us better. Sincerely.
    2. matross
      matross 5 September 2013 11: 48
      +3
      Quote: fzr1000
      results of a survey by the Pew Research Center, writes Kommersant.

      A tendentious survey of a biased center.
      64% in Egypt - sheer nonsense ...
      Quote: fzr1000

      goldfinger


      Quote: fzr1000
      "bulbashi"

      You pulled it by the ears. We have no more fraternal people than Belarusians! And the attitude is appropriate
    3. Russ69
      Russ69 5 September 2013 11: 50
      +2
      Quote: fzr1000
      Russia has developed a predominantly negative image abroad.

      In relation to the USA, according to similar polls, it looks even sadder.
    4. kush62
      kush62 5 September 2013 13: 19
      +5
      Another would be to poll how much of the population the "merchant" himself can not stand, in addition to the "echo of Moscow
      " in Russia.
    5. cdrt
      cdrt 5 September 2013 13: 44
      0
      But to me, here's what the United States, to Germany ...... monotonously.

      False at the root.
      In any war, support for the public opinion of key countries is no less important than military successes.
      In fact, the Vietnam War has shown how to wage war without public support.
      The wars in Iraq (all from 1991 to 2012), Afghanistan had quite full support of people (in half of Europe, in the USA).

      Now, despite the presence of the same brainwashing apparatus, more than half of the inhabitants, even in the USA, do not support the war.

      Moreover, despite the rather traditional and historically justified Russophobia (Russia and the United States are still historically on opposite sides of the world table), they treat us positively almost as much as negatively.
  15. serzhserzh86
    serzhserzh86 5 September 2013 09: 50
    +4
    why doesn’t anyone demand the use of force against the rebels if the UN commission concludes that they are involved in a chemical attack?
  16. GRDS
    GRDS 5 September 2013 09: 51
    0
    Quote: vasiliysxx
    Obama doesn’t want to talk face to face, even though the presidents, as well as people, you can get to the black tower behind closed doors. (I really want to repeat)


    It has long been an impression that Maxim is very afraid of Vladimir Vladimirovich, all the more so, to have a one-on-one dialogue with him. Therefore, he hides as best he can, looking for prepositions so as not to meet and not talk. More and more reminiscent of a naughty boy.
  17. Igarr
    Igarr 5 September 2013 09: 54
    +5
    Such thoughts are interesting, brothers.
    I read it with pleasure.
    As for me, I understood that Putin has a clear conviction that OS was not used by Assad. In this case, we can say what the GDP said.
    In addition - "... if the UN Security Council decides ...". Will accept, but how. And China will veto. And the whole decision.
    ....
    I am of the same opinion - Vladimir Vladimirovich reassures Obama before meeting in Leningrad. So as not to piss.
    And it gives the opportunity - not to lose face.
    there is still time to work out the reverse.
  18. andrey1508
    andrey1508 5 September 2013 10: 04
    +2
    That's right, it was the reverse: OMs were used by the rebels - let's gouge them together, since the groups were assembled.
    1. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 5 September 2013 21: 39
      0
      Ha, cool said, plus))
  19. KazaK Bo
    KazaK Bo 5 September 2013 10: 18
    +6
    Putin presented convincing arguments against the intentions of the US administration to launch a military operation in Syria.

    I listened to almost the full text of the interview twice. The impression of a calm, without nervous and extreme attacks, the interview leaves the impression that Putin has a joker up his sleeve and he will definitely use it. The first "knockdown" has already taken place - calling publicly and reasonably the US Secretary of State Mr. KERRY is a liar, VVP brought him out of the game, since he refused to go after that and disgrace himself to PETER! This was the first warning. Apparently there are others ... At the GXNUMX summit, where they were going to "smear PUTIN and RUSSIA with a face on a table," the GDP found very weighty arguments ... And everything turned out on the contrary. Now OBAMA does not have any arguments ... therefore, he is simply afraid to meet ... so that the GXNUMX summit does not repeat itself.
    But the most interesting thing is that today TV news footage showed the same KERRY, who admitted in the Senate that the Sunni Arab billionaires simply paid for the upcoming US aggression against SYRIA. And that the USA will accept this money! This is a sensation! The United States is just dirty Mercenaries and their soldiers will fight, as it turns out, not for the interests of the Amer, but for the confessional interests of the Arab Sunnis from Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
    That would be to competently and quickly beat these recognition of the US Secretary of State!
    1. fedorru
      fedorru 5 September 2013 15: 35
      0
      Or it could outbid the US Army, and then the missiles will fly to Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
  20. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 5 September 2013 10: 28
    +2
    Behind Abram are people. You have to negotiate with them,
    I hope this happens, and this is all - clowning for the TV.
  21. Stavr
    Stavr 5 September 2013 10: 39
    +3
    Quote: vasiliysxx
    Obama doesn’t want to talk face to face, even though the presidents, as well as people, you can get to the black tower behind closed doors. (I really want to repeat)

    Still)) because Obama knows that GDP is our judo fighter ..... this is not for him Dima with badminton))
  22. Max_Bauder
    Max_Bauder 5 September 2013 10: 41
    -11 qualifying.
    Quote: VasDA
    Once again he lit up a hornet's nest ... laughing Now, interpreters, sign language readers, interpreters will come out ... It’s for God, sometimes it seems that we need to speak with the West very monosyllabic so that they understand ... Type: I'm going, I'm sitting, I'm eating, etc. etc. And then there will be doubts about their adequacy ... KVM


    What to interpret? all clear! He passed! back included! Arctic fox! now wait for experienced self-confident fighters after their victory, after they have washed Syria with blood, otherwise, after the massive carpet bombing, the poor fellows of Damascus will have no resistance, and these brutes will finish them off. I'm sorry, very sorry, really the Syrians have sinned so much that God punishes them so, I don’t know his will at all, but the main thing is I am sure that although they will die, they will try to make the world a better place, they will fight for the good. As one philosopher said: For evil to exist, it is necessary that good people do nothing, and now the next "good" will do nothing.

    Only the dead saw the end of the war (Plato)
  23. olviko
    olviko 5 September 2013 10: 46
    +3
    Putin’s interview was held in the spirit of martial arts principles:
    1. An attacking push, a falling push.
    2. "Use your opponent's momentum against him."
    3. In polemics, it is not recommended to beat off an energetic attack "head on". It is necessary to stretch the enemy around you and turn him 180 degrees - using his own arguments.
    It seems that Kerry has already been deployed, she won’t go to the summit. And rightly so, don’t lie to hell when crowded!
    1. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 6 September 2013 11: 49
      0
      Again lying, just like the historians of Russia

      Kutuzov flees from Napoleon, and everyone is looking for some idea in this that they say a specially planned retreat, and the hell was grumbling there! he just cowardly fled, and if only he could not have surrendered Moscow, than to burn.

      and here the same Putin (for obvious reasons) says that he will not fight on the side of Syria, and here again: oh! he specifically said this to deceive the Americans!

      Are you blind? from each conversation in the Pentagon conclude when to start the operation
  24. Cormorants
    Cormorants 5 September 2013 11: 02
    +1
    Very interesting interview. GDP is a very smart politician.
    1. America says they don’t need UN consent, Congress will decide
    2. UN stands for a political decision, but at the same time does not want to meddle in US internal affairs
    3. Syria asks UN for help
    4. Russia agrees to the bombing of Syria if the UN decides on the basis of evidence the use of chemical. weapons of Syria.
    1. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 6 September 2013 11: 52
      0
      Quote: Cormorants
      Very interesting interview. GDP is a very smart politician.


      still would! only the foolish on the side of the weak fights, and the smart gives him up for cowardice or for profit, the latter is preferable, for this the story does not kick much
  25. michajlo
    michajlo 5 September 2013 12: 04
    +5
    Good morning everybody!

    Let's leave aside tidbits for prizes and many speculations of capable Western journalists.

    It has been said and shown a lot, even more so far it is a secret, both from the side of special services of the West and from the part of some parts of the Syrian army and Russian military experts.

    Perhaps we should try to calm down, although it is difficult for people who think and doubt, and just wait, although sometimes it is very difficult.

    Since none of us here on the site is currently in Syria, helping the cause of the Syrian army and ordinary people, we can only in our thoughts and words support and spread the truth about the Wahhabi intervention in Syria, which it will develop into an act of direct foreign aggression with unpredictable consequences.

    And now I want to say that it is quite possible over time, some of us, including myself, will regret that we personally did not take part in the real defense of Syria ... And we limited ourselves to virtual assistance to the Syrian ally.
    1. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 6 September 2013 11: 53
      0
      Quote: michajlo
      And now I want to say that it is quite possible over time, some of us, including myself, will regret that we personally did not take part in the real defense of Syria ... And we limited ourselves to virtual assistance to the Syrian ally.


      one is not a warrior in the field, you know that? we are not Achilles, in a crowd, or rather an army, we could
  26. crot
    crot 5 September 2013 13: 32
    0
    And here is the version of Marat Musin to Obama’s sharp reaction to bomb Syria as a witness of events that took place in those areas of Damascus where allegedly government troops used a chemical. weapons.
  27. URAL72
    URAL72 5 September 2013 14: 02
    +6
    Quote: GRDS
    Quote: vasiliysxx
    Obama doesn’t want to talk face to face, even though the presidents, as well as people, you can get to the black tower behind closed doors. (I really want to repeat)


    It has long been an impression that Maxim is very afraid of Vladimir Vladimirovich, all the more so, to have a one-on-one dialogue with him. Therefore, he hides as best he can, looking for prepositions so as not to meet and not talk. More and more reminiscent of a naughty boy.


    Putin is an excellent diplomat, but even harsh, not diplomatic statements sometimes slip through him. He is a very frank person, restrained only by the framework of the diplomatic protocol and professional duties. Imagine how he cuts the truth-uterus at a one-on-one meeting ... There’s nothing to hide the beaver, all their evidence is from the category of professional lie of lawyers. I think Putin in a personal conversation will talk about specific countermeasures of Russia, which cannot be declared openly in order to maintain the country's image.
  28. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 5 September 2013 19: 36
    +2
    I agree with my colleagues, Babama just doesn’t want to talk with Putin, she knows that one-on-one can’t fornicate, like they are fornication in Congress or on TV screens.