Military Review

Syrian hot news: legal hooks justify invader Obama

155
This review is a summary of the latest News about the situation around Syria.


According to "Russian newspaper" With reference to ITAR-TASS, Carla del Ponte, a member of the UN commission to investigate possible human rights violations in Syria, claims that sarin was used by the Syrian opposition.



The testimony of witnesses and victims of a chemical attack near Damascus suggests that the nerve gas was used precisely by armed rebels.

Carla del Ponte also stated:

"The expert committee has not yet found any evidence of the use of chemical weapons by the government army weapons».


The representative noted that the commission continues to investigate the use of chemical weapons.

In another material "RG" it is reported that the report of chemical weapons experts may be given in the coming days. As ITAR-TASS reports. This was said at the headquarters of the UN Security Council. The inspectors will arrive in New York and will report on the results of the investigation in Syria already 1 or 2 September.

According to Ban Ki-moon, the head of the group of experts on chemical weapons, Mr. Selstrom will arrive in New York on Saturday.

In addition, according to Alexander Gasyuk ("RG"), a UN expert group investigating the use of chemical weapons, has obtained evidence that official Damascus did not use toxic substances. As Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mikdad told reporters, Syrian government forces "never used chemical weapons." “We have evidence of this, we handed them over to the commission of UN inspectors,” the diplomat added.

As noted by Evgeny Shestakov ("Russian newspaper") neither the United States nor the United Kingdom provided the UN with evidence of the involvement of the Syrian authorities in the chemical attack near Damascus. This was stated by the special representative of the UN Secretary-General for Syria Lakhdar Brahimi. According to him, “some substance was used that killed a lot of people. The numbers are called 300 or 600 people, maybe a thousand. "

Nevertheless, London demanded to convene an emergency meeting of the Security Council to discuss a resolution condemning the Assad regime for ... the use of chemical weapons.

It became known that the administration of Barack Obama announced to the US Congress that there was “indisputable” evidence that the use of chemical weapons in Syria was coordinated with official Damascus. About this reports the agency "Reuters" with reference to a member of the committee of the House of Representatives on Foreign Affairs Eliot Angel. As notes "Lenta.ru"A White House spokesman said on a conference call that reports by Syrian senior officials intercepted by US intelligence testify to Damascus’s responsibility. Of course, the names of the officials are not called. Earlier, American media claimed that intelligence intercepted a telephone conversation between Syrian Defense Minister Fahad Jassim al-Freij and the head of the chemical forces on the day of the attack.

Congress was also told that before the attack near Damascus, a movement of government troops was recorded, indicating "preparation of something serious like a chemical attack."

The statement about “something serious like,” we add from ourselves, is, of course, an excellent and comprehensive argument. And the boys and girls from the UN - so, extras, a little bit beyond their third-role roles.

But that's not all. The press also writes about Obama's speech, who gave an interview to the PBS channel and stated - no more, no less - that the Syrian government was behind the recent chemical attack near Damascus.

"Available US data indicates that opposition forces do not possess chemical weapons and the means of their delivery," Obama quotes. "RT". Then the president turned to the method of evidence, which is a favorite of Americans: “analyzing information”: “Analysis of information showed that this was the work of the Syrian authorities. And if so, there must be international consequences. ”

However, he added that "has not yet made a decision."

Next - just guard. These are not double or even triple standards. This is the newest postmodern international law. In the end, Obama is rightly familiar with, tea, he studied at a prestigious institution of higher education.

But the official representative of the White House came out to the public - and stated that the legal circumstances, I mean the legal justification of the military strike on Syria, will be presented after the final decision of Obama.

As transmits RIA News" With reference to Reuters, the United States will independently develop a legal rationale for a military strike on Syria in the event Barack Obama decides to conduct such an operation.

Answering a journalist’s question about the legal viability of a military operation in Syria, White House spokesman Josh Ernest said:

“When the president is finally determined with the appropriate decision, then we will develop and present the legal justification for the legally justifying circumstances.”


This is how it is, comrades and gentlemen? .. It's very simple: the president will decide, and we will legally justify it. The law is that the pole: where he turned, it went there. Like this. Before this statement, even the award in the 2009 year of Obama's Nobel Peace Prize fades.

And so that the inspectors from the UN did not go into the matter, they were told to cover the investigation.

In the article "The Americans asked the UN not to continue the investigation in Syria" ("Le Figaro", France; source of translation - "InoSMI") Georges Malbruneau writes that the American operation against the Syrian regime seems inevitable.

"US officials told the UN that it is better for inspectors not to continue the mission," said an informed diplomatic source. And he continues: “The US did not openly ask them to leave Syria, but they reported that the intelligence services had evidence that the regime’s forces used chemical weapons last week in Damascus and that they no longer need to continue the investigation.”

“As it was already in Iraq in December 1998 of the year, the departure of the mission of the UN inspectors from Damascus will be a sign of the imminent military strikes on the Bashar al-Assad regime. In 1998, the United States bombed the symbols of Saddam Hussein’s power for four days, who was accused of concealing chemical weapons. The operation began only a few hours after the UN mission left Baghdad. On Tuesday, a group of UN inspectors remained at the Damascus hotel, as its security was not adequately ensured. ”


The same diplomatic source notes that “the Russians said they were not going to fight, and thereby agreed to a limited American strike” on the Union regime.

However, Obama pulls back. He does this because Congress demanded an explanation from him.

The terms of armed intervention by the US and its allies in the Syrian conflict may be revised: lawmakers demanded from the president detailed and motivated explanations of the need to participate in the next military campaign, the channel said "RT" with reference to the Wall Street Journal.

John Bochner, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, sent a message to Obama, which requires clear explanations about the military actions against Syria - before they are taken. In this letter, the President of the United States criticized: he did not consult with the legislators on this issue.

By the way, the message was signed by 116 members of the House of Representatives.

Bochner recommends that Obama "inform the Americans and Congress about the objectives, goals and a comprehensive strategy for Syria before its first missile is launched."

As for ordinary Americans, they do not want the US invasion of Syria at all. The original open letter titled “Dear World, Americans Do Not Want War with Syria” (by Eric Blair) published on activistpost.com (translation source - Mixednews.ru).

Here are text snippets:

“... After Gadhafi’s corpse was dragged through the streets of Libya, our Foreign Minister told you with a demonic grin:“ We have come. We saw. He died". I realized: they want to put us all bloodthirsty thugs.

Perhaps you believe that we all agree with the endless wars and illegal drone attacks. Maybe you think we justify indefinite detention or torture of other people. You may think that we support the role of a gendarme and a spy network funded by our taxes. Perhaps you believe that we support the arrogant feigned courage of our government regarding the conquest of the world. You might even hate us for all this.

Despite the fact that they tell you from a bilateral television screen, we are not satisfied with the actions of our government. Our government has completely gone AWOL. They do not represent us. We do not share their enthusiasm for blood. They disgust us ... "


The author adds:

“Like you, we just want a peaceful and productive life with hope for a better future for our children. We want joy, peace, love, and freedom to make our dreams come true. Obviously, our government does not represent these values, since we have no power over it. It rules over us.

Our representatives long ago ceased to represent our interests ... "


And more:

"We are told that our president is meeting with his military team to think about the attack on Syria, another independent state that has never harmed or even threatened to harm the Americans - like all other recent victims ..."


Finally:

“Announcing the war of Obama against Syria, the article on the Associated Press did not receive a single comment in support of military intervention. Not a single one. Instead, all comments add up to a story about cynicism, conspiracy, and corruption. This is a sign that Americans are rapidly awakening ... "


As for an American ally such as Britain, the House of Commons of the British Parliament rejected a resolution on a possible military operation against Syria, reports newsru.co.il with reference to the BBC TV and Radio Corporation.

After the debates on the night of 30 August, a vote was taken, during which 272 MPs voted in support of the document proposed by the government, and 285 deputies voted against it.

After the vote, David Cameron said that the British parliament made it clear that he was opposed to military action in Syria, and promised to "act accordingly."

The decision of Parliament makes it impossible for British troops to participate in the US-led operation against Bashar Assad.

As reported today RIA News" With reference to Reuters, Pentagon chief Chuck Hagel said that, despite Britain’s refusal, the United States will seek to create an international coalition for military intervention in Syria.

But not only Britain abandoned the war with Syria.

As writes today "Russian newspaper", at least twelve NATO countries refused to participate in a military operation against Syria, unless it is sanctioned by the UN Security Council. It is reported by ITAR-TASS, citing an informed source in Brussels.

The agency’s interlocutor said: “The countries that have already refused, with all certainty, any form of participation in the hostilities in Syria without the sanction of the UN Security Council, are in fact much more;

Thus, Barack H. Obama will have to work hard to make an anti-Syrian coalition. In addition, Obama is dissatisfied with his native Congress.

The situation around Syria perfectly shows two turning points in the newest stories and geopolitics: 1) The United States is no longer pulling the hegemon and the world gendarme, only one puff remains of its political determination; 2) the Syrian war revealed a serious split in NATO, which indicates a crisis in the organization. It should be added here that Washington was left at the most inopportune moment without its key ally, Britain.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
155 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. GreatRussia
    GreatRussia 30 August 2013 09: 46 New
    20
    According to Rossiiskaya Gazeta, citing ITAR-TASS, Carla del Ponte, a member of the UN commission to investigate possible human rights violations in Syria, claims that sarin was used by the Syrian opposition.


    Next - just guard. These are not double or even triple standards. This is the newest postmodern international law. In the end, Obama is rightly familiar with, tea, he studied at a prestigious institution of higher education.


    bully

    Comments I think will be redundant here. And so everything is clear.


    1928 year.
    "Cat and People" (M Zoshchenko)


    My stove is very bad. My whole family will always die through her. And the devil’s jacket refuses to make repairs. Saves. For another waste.
    They examined this stove of mine just now. The views looked. They dived inward with their heads.
    “No,” they say. “You can live.”
    “Comrades,” I say, “it’s a shame to say such words: you can live.” We will always burn through your stove. Just now, the cat was even mad. She was sick right now by the bucket. And you say - you can live.
    The chairman of the jakta says:
    “Then,” he says, “we will arrange an experiment now and see if your stove burns out.” If we’ll eradicate after the furnace now - we will shift your happiness. If we do not erase - we apologize for the heating.
    We flooded the stove. Settled around her.
    We are sitting. Sniff.
    So, by the viewer, the chairman sat, so was the secretary Griboedov, and so, on my bed, the treasurer.
    Soon, of course, fumes began to sweep around the room.
    The chairman sniffed and said:
    - Nope. Not felt. There is a warm spirit, and nothing more.
    Treasurer, toad, says:
    “It’s a great atmosphere.” And you can smell it. The head through this does not weaken. I, - says, - in the apartment the atmosphere stinks worse, and I, - says, - I will not whine in vain. And here the spirit is absolutely equal.
    I say:
    - But how, have mercy, smooth. Avon is flowing like gas.
    The Chairperson says:
    - Call the cat. If the cat sits quietly, it means that there’s not a damn thing. The animal is always selfless in this. This is not a man. You can rely on her.
    A cat comes. Sits down on the bed. Sitting quietly. And, of course, quietly - she is somewhat accustomed.
    “No,” says the chairman, “we apologize.”
    Suddenly the treasurer swayed in bed and said:
    “I need, you know, to hurry on business.”
    And he comes to the window and breathes into the crack.
    And he stands green and sways right on his feet.
    The Chairperson says:
    - Now let's go.
    I pulled him away from the window.
    - So, - I say, - it is impossible to build an examination.
    He says:
    - You are welcome. I can move away. Your air is quite useful to me. Healthy air. I can’t do the repair for you. The stove is normal.
    And half an hour later, when this same chairman was put on a stretcher and then pulled the stretcher into the ambulance, I talked to him.
    I say:
    - Well, how?
    “No,” he says, “there will be no repair.” You can live.
    They didn’t fix it.
    Well what to do? I'm getting used to it. Man is not a flea - can do anything
    get used to it.


    1. Retx
      Retx 30 August 2013 10: 46 New
      55
      August 29, Riga
      The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops
      In this regard, the Latvian naval raft and air kite are put on high alert.
      1. Refund_SSSR
        Refund_SSSR 30 August 2013 10: 48 New
        29
        From Wikipedia Latvian Air Force:
        The Air Force has 319 troops, three aircraft (one L-410 and two An-2) and six helicopters (four Mi-17 and two Mi-2)

        From Wikipedia of the Latvian Navy:
        The naval forces consist of 587 troops [7] and five ships, the main task of which is the clearance of territorial waters.

        Where?! Where are they going ?!
        Parade of crazy laughing
        1. Raptor75
          Raptor75 30 August 2013 11: 12 New
          +6
          It was a joke of humor ...
        2. denson06
          denson06 30 August 2013 11: 35 New
          16
          In Syria, after such a statement, everyone in the army will lose heart, kneel down and say: "Only not Latvia .. please don’t" .. laughing
          Here you can immediately see who creeps before whom ..
        3. Wedmak
          Wedmak 30 August 2013 11: 39 New
          16
          No, well, An-2 is a great power ... and then there are TWO of them! I can imagine how the Americans were laughing at the Americans over this statement.
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 12: 02 New
            10
            Quote: Wedmak
            Imagine laughing

            apparently they are not laughing, with the allies a complete bummer, one hope, for sprats, zheks and Georgians
            1. Vadivak
              Vadivak 30 August 2013 12: 06 New
              12
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              with the allies a complete bummer about


              Even Karl’s mother claims that sarin was used by the Syrian opposition, striped are bad
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 12: 08 New
                +4
                Quote: Vadivak
                Even Karl’s mother claims that sarin was used by the Syrian opposition, striped are bad

                well, for the sake of truth, she said that there is no confirmation that Assad used it
            2. Wedmak
              Wedmak 30 August 2013 12: 15 New
              +7
              one hope for sprats, zheks and Georgians

              Now I won’t get out of the table for a long time ... laughing
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 12: 19 New
                +6
                Quote: Wedmak
                Now, long from under the table

                is it scary?
                Can you imagine what poor Assad is?
                Well, of course, if he knows where this Latvia is
          2. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 12: 14 New
            12
            Quote: Wedmak
            well an-2 great power


            tremble the enemy
            and after the old goats and young goats, they will be thrown from the AN-2 and all Assad will sign surrender with a fright

            1. Wedmak
              Wedmak 30 August 2013 12: 20 New
              +7
              Pl..y ... I here after a picture of "goats" almost returned the eaten lunch back. Pancake...
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 12: 32 New
                15
                Quote: Wedmak
                nearly returned the eaten lunch back. Pancake...

                ohhh than not WMD
                and now imagine that this is not a picture, but it’s being poured live on your head from 2 ANushki, and even with dildos outweighed, the whole war is lost
                1. novobranets
                  novobranets 30 August 2013 12: 47 New
                  +7
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  It pours on your head from 2 ANushki, and even with the dildos to the advantage, the whole war is lost

                  Monstrous, inhuman weapons, all defense will be demoralized and the staff writhes in gagging spasms.
                  1. rus9875
                    rus9875 30 August 2013 13: 42 New
                    +6
                    especially if they start to fight with daisies and say, how nasty you are "
                2. Polytechnic
                  Polytechnic 30 August 2013 15: 50 New
                  +3
                  no no no, defending troops with great frenzy will defend themselves, fearing for their honor more death!
                  1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                    Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 16: 13 New
                    +1
                    Nuuu, too, may be, although they may escape despite all the detachment obstacles, all the same, it will take horror
                3. FATEMOGAN
                  FATEMOGAN 30 August 2013 18: 24 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  ohhh, than not WMDs now imagine that this is not a picture but live it pours on your head from 2 ANushki, and even with dildos to the advantage, the whole war is lost


                  Then it would be quite nice if the mighty Latvian air force goes astray a bit and puts these mmmm ... cyber soldiers on jihadists wassat
                  1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                    Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 18: 45 New
                    +2
                    Quote: FATEMOGAN
                    Then it would be really nice if the mighty Latvian air force goes astray a bit

                    and you, my friend, are a sadist
                    1. FATEMOGAN
                      FATEMOGAN 30 August 2013 18: 56 New
                      +8
                      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                      and you, my friend, are a sadist


                      No, I think that some, that others, will be glad to each other bully
                      Now, according to the latest news, we landed, even a video was sent ... bully

            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. loft79
              loft79 31 August 2013 02: 31 New
              +2
              Video: "Parade of Latvia"

              Aaaaa ... I almost died laughing. Watch the passage of technology and listen to the commentator, choke on laughter)))

              - "Here are our border guards, it’s not strange with the Kalashnikovs ..."
              - "And here is the powerful artillery ......"
              - "Here are two powerful Swedish trucks ....."
              - "Here are two powerful Mercedes"
              - "And we also have 3 tanks, but they don’t take part in the parade ...."

              And all this in a very serious voice.
              good good good
            4. Demetrius29
              Demetrius29 31 August 2013 08: 57 New
              +2
              This is the third time I've watched this video and I can’t understand everything. The operator is joking or seriously commenting on what is happening)))
        4. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 12: 01 New
          0
          The Air Force has 319 troops, three aircraft (one L-410 and two An-2) and six helicopters (four Mi-17 and two Mi-2)

          and "turboletter" how did it get into military aviation?
        5. Humen
          Humen 30 August 2013 12: 01 New
          +4
          But they managed to show the full loyalty of the USA =) As Krylov’s fable expects from all the phrases: "Ay, Pug! She is strong to know that she barks at the Elephant!"
        6. alex13-61
          alex13-61 30 August 2013 12: 03 New
          +4
          Quote: We refund_SSSR
          Where?! Where are they going ?!
          Parade of crazy

          So fidelity to the cartridge needs to be demonstrated, otherwise they will inadvertently be forgotten ....
        7. Tuzik
          Tuzik 30 August 2013 13: 59 New
          +1
          and the United States needs a legal coalition, not an actual coalition, it’s suitable for them and San Marino, just to sign up, and they will write off the tomahawks from the budget.
        8. _Forgiven_
          _Forgiven_ 31 August 2013 01: 30 New
          0
          The parade of Latvian clowns on the Cossacks decided to show their power)))
        9. papas-57
          papas-57 31 August 2013 04: 38 New
          +2
          After such statements, Obama needs the Latvian contingent to be placed on the front line of the attacking forces. The whole world will laugh for a long time.
        10. Ulysses
          Ulysses 31 August 2013 11: 55 New
          0
          Select dangerous toys.
          And then inadvertently break something in his Baltic sandbox.
      2. avant-garde
        avant-garde 30 August 2013 10: 53 New
        14
        Quote: RETX
        In this regard, the Latvian naval raft and air kite are put on high alert.

        mood lifted laughing
      3. Docent1984
        Docent1984 30 August 2013 10: 59 New
        +7
        At this point, apparently, everyone should put on his pants))))
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 11: 13 New
          +3
          Quote: Docent1984
          At this point, apparently, everyone should put on his pants))))

          Yeah, Assad is copying. laughing
      4. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 11: 12 New
        +3
        Quote: RETX
        August 29, Riga
        The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops

        Bugaga wassat wassat wassat
      5. stroporez
        stroporez 30 August 2013 12: 53 New
        0
        Quote: RETX
        The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops
        Well, all ------- PPC Asad ........ the unstoppable Latvian warriors show --- "sho for what" ....... wassat
      6. rus9875
        rus9875 30 August 2013 13: 39 New
        +1
        Assad is probably in a panic - hot Latvian guys are going to overthrow him
        1. FATEMOGAN
          FATEMOGAN 30 August 2013 18: 28 New
          0
          Quote: rus9875
          Assad is probably in a panic - hot Latvian guys are going to overthrow him


          And since you go far and gather for a long time, you should wait for them no earlier than the next century, and then if you don’t make a mistake laughing
      7. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 13: 46 New
        +8
        Quote: RETX
        The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops

        “America presented the Lithuanian army with 40 thousand decommissioned M-14 rifles. In Lithuania, they thought for a long time how to divide all the rifles into 16 thousand army. As a result, a truly ingenious decision was made. Each soldier was given three rifles. One to shoot. Second "to shoot if the first sticks, and the third is given in the teeth to shoot from it, if all the previous ones fail."
        Armed to the teeth, Lithuanians are a terrible thing!
        1. novobranets
          novobranets 30 August 2013 18: 14 New
          +1
          "Gentlemen, it seems to me it was a comedy" laughing
      8. Scoun
        Scoun 30 August 2013 16: 53 New
        +2
        Quote: RETX
        The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops

        Actually .. the main "product number 1" of Latvia is another indicator of lice
        The situation around Syria perfectly shows

        who is who ... Actually, Babamka needed to say "thank you" .... it immediately became clear who the United States was licking the fifth point ... Davut and Erdogan - Turkey ... "cunning boy" Netanyahu - Israel, the feathered representative of France - Oland, another "cunning boy" Cameron - England well, other other mongrels ...
        and it became clear Countries that still have a sense of dignity Egypt, Austria, Germany and others ...
      9. Garrin
        Garrin 30 August 2013 18: 15 New
        0
        Quote: RETX
        The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops

        Well, how much cooler it would have sounded: "The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to destroy the al-Assad government forces on its own."
        It seems that the difference is small, but the nuances ...
      10. APASUS
        APASUS 30 August 2013 20: 16 New
        +3
        Quote: RETX
        In this regard, the Latvian naval raft and air kite are put on high alert.

        The corn truck is fueled and all the ground forces (2 people) are fed before a long flight !!!
      11. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 21: 00 New
        0
        Quote: RETX
        The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops

        Americans are wondering what to call the joint armed forces of Lithuania,
        Latvia and Estonia. Either as an enlarged company, or as
        understaffed battalion!
      12. Curculum
        Curculum 30 August 2013 22: 28 New
        +1
        Quote: RETX
        The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops

        The motto of the President of Latvia: the main thing is to lick the asshole on time!
      13. _Forgiven_
        _Forgiven_ 31 August 2013 01: 30 New
        0
        Navy it is said a lot!))) God grant that the amers reduce their ardor and crap on the shore. I hope this will not come to an intervention, otherwise the consequences of these actions will be simply unpredictable ...
    2. Crocodile
      Crocodile 30 August 2013 10: 53 New
      +5
      Wolf and Lamb

      The strong is always powerless to blame:
      In the story we hear the darkness of examples
      But we don’t write stories
      But how they say in fables ...

      On a hot day, the lamb went to the stream to get drunk:
      And I need to happen,
      What about those places hungry wolf Wolf.
      He sees the lamb, seeks prey;
      But, to give the case, although a legitimate view and sense,
      Shouts: "How dare you, insolent, with an unclean snout
      Here net stir up drink My
      With sand and silt?
      For insolence
      I'll rip your head off. "-
      "When the brightest Wolf allows,
      I dare to bring that down the stream
      From the lordship of his steps I drink a hundred;
      And he must be angry in vain:
      I can’t stir up a drink for him. "-
      "Therefore I lie!
      Worthless! Was such audacity heard in the world!
      Yes, I remember that you are still in the summer before
      Here I was somehow rude;
      I haven’t forgotten that, buddy! "-
      "Have mercy, I’m also no longer a year old." -
      The lamb says. “So it was your brother.” -
      "I have no brothers." - "So this is Kum il Swat.
      And, in a word, someone from your own family.
      You yourself, your dogs and your shepherds,
      You all want me to be evil
      And if you can, then always harm me;
      But I’m for you to divorce their sins. "-
      "Ah, what am I to blame?" - "Be quiet! I'm tired of listening.
      Leisure me sort your fault, puppy!
      You are to blame for the fact that I want to eat. "
      Said and dragged into the dark forest Lamb.


      The strong is always powerless to blame ...
      Did you go to school, will we go in life?
      Well, actually, what can Syria prove to the Amers?
      But to the Shtatovs, on the contrary, it would be worth thinking about, it’s not an hour’s time to find the strength, it’s painful to bite.

      Today, while the United States still has power and enjoys its position, it shows in its own words disregard for the rules and understanding of its own impunity, shows rudeness and anger in turning to the world. But, and the meaning, as always - “You are to blame for the fact that I want to eat” - arrogance and shamelessness that has not been covered up.
      According to RIA Novosti with reference to Reuters, the United States will independently develop a legal justification for a military strike against Syria if Barack Obama decides to conduct such an operation.
      It is clear that the force acting as she pleases is difficult to stop. Here amers and are surprised that it turns out you still need to make excuses! am
      1. zanoza
        zanoza 30 August 2013 13: 11 New
        +4
        Quote: Crocodile
        ... The strong is always powerless to blame ...

        Listening to the sayings and opinions of Western leaders on the issue of events in Syria, I personally create an opinion, that the "guys" smoked something, went through alcohol and chewed on hallucinogenic mushrooms. wassat And all this was accepted at once. They confuse the "white" with the "black", something seems to be, cajole and cherish a certain Syrian opposition, judging by the names of howling groups, these "brothers" are not Syrians and not from these places. The frank intervention of external terrorist forces is perceived as inside the Syrian "popular" resistance. The army is fighting these cannibalistic invaders, the West is shouting that they are destroying civilians (?) fool
        А the aggressiveness of these leaders West and USA in general beyond. At the time, compare with the cannibalistic inclinations of a number of representatives of the external "Syrian opposition."
    3. Suhov
      Suhov 30 August 2013 15: 13 New
      +2
      How is it, comrades and gentlemen? .. It’s very simple: the president will decide, and we will justify him legally.
      Law that drawbar: where I turned, it turned out there. Like this. Before this statement, even the award in 2009 of Obama's Nobel Peace Prize fades.

      Или:
      The law is that shaking
      How will give - so wow!
      sad
  2. Tatarus
    Tatarus 30 August 2013 09: 47 New
    +6
    They create what they want. It is necessary to rest against the horn. It seems to me that in Syria we have a chance to break the US ridge. Which is already cracking.
    1. Igor39
      Igor39 30 August 2013 10: 26 New
      +8
      The US government understands that not hitting Syria is showing its weakness, rapidly advancing, but hitting is accelerating the weakening of its military and economic power, Obama has something to think about, and Putin is mysteriously silent, who knows how he will respond, intrigue however.
      1. AleksUkr
        AleksUkr 30 August 2013 11: 46 New
        +3
        US President Barack Obama believes that the "fundamental interests" of the country are at stake in Syria. LET AND FURTHER THINKS. We do not bother him.

        And that Putin speak. He had already spoken with Cameron and Merkel. Respecting himself and his country should not make unnecessary statements. And silence, often, can be interpreted in the right direction by enemies and friends.
      2. FATEMOGAN
        FATEMOGAN 30 August 2013 18: 47 New
        +1
        Quote: Igor39
        The US government understands that not hitting Syria is showing its weakness, rapidly advancing, but hitting is accelerating the weakening of its military and economic power, Obama has something to think about, and Putin is mysteriously silent, who knows how he will respond, intrigue however.


        Amer drove themselves into a trap, while not having any trump cards in their hands for the 20 Summit other than some mysterious audio recording, which, like Obama, no one had heard. And there, our group of the Navy (not Lithuanian understandable) near the coast of Syria monitors the airspace on any. At the same time, the Russian military can also transmit information received during monitoring to the Syrian air defense calculations - this is a sharp fork in Amer’s fat ass. And according to the latest data from the Russian Navy, the aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov is going to Tartus, Russia is taking a curious alignment, this is a strong move for any reason, there’s still gunpowder in the powder flasks !!!
    2. CTEPX
      CTEPX 30 August 2013 10: 32 New
      +4
      Quote: Tatarus
      in Syria, we have a chance to break the US ridge.

      Yes, if we manage to sign a financial agreement with China, despite the threat of an attack on Syria)).
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 11: 13 New
        +6
        Quote: ctepx
        Yes, if we manage to sign a financial agreement with China, despite the threat of an attack on Syria)).

        In any case, it will be signed, Syria is not a bargaining chip.
        1. CTEPX
          CTEPX 30 August 2013 11: 17 New
          +2
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          It will be signed anyway

          God grant)).
      2. T-130
        T-130 31 August 2013 20: 51 New
        0
        This is not breaking a ridge, but cutting off a head!
    3. SPACE
      SPACE 30 August 2013 12: 19 New
      +1
      Quote: Tatarus
      They create what they want. It is necessary to rest against the horn. It seems to me that in Syria we have a chance to break the US ridge. Which is already cracking.

      Now is the most convenient moment for force impact, or rather presence! It is urgent to pull off the surface and underwater strike forces into the eastern Mediterranean, into the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. Strike while the iron is hot. It is necessary to help the gentlemen sober up from the west ...
      1. T-130
        T-130 31 August 2013 20: 52 New
        0
        why is everything so complicated? just need to make it clear to the guys that if they climb, their financial system will collapse!
    4. Donvel
      Donvel 30 August 2013 12: 34 New
      +3
      It is possible that they will break it. The only question is whether the government forces have enough to resist the best army in the world. It seems that their strength is running out. The UN is most disappointing - it seems to have been created to "maintain world peace," and as a result, it is discussed at the meetings on whom and in what composition to attack and what time to come up with an excuse
  3. shinobi
    shinobi 30 August 2013 09: 47 New
    +7
    The French would still be in place and Syria would be another half a year, a year of time to finish off the cannibals
    1. il grand casino
      il grand casino 30 August 2013 09: 48 New
      +9
      French migrants should be helped to start the struggle to overthrow the dictatorial government in Paris. Joke smile
      1. Apollo
        Apollo 30 August 2013 09: 52 New
        +5
        theme infographics

        1. alone
          alone 30 August 2013 10: 08 New
          +4
          Well, anti-aircraft guns are not a serious tool against the fight against NATO, but those 900
          80% of old systems that can be easily damped. The exception is beech and shells. It will not be easy to repel an attack, it remains to be hoped that there will still be no impact.
          1. Retx
            Retx 30 August 2013 10: 15 New
            +3
            I agree, there is enough strength to snap back, but to be saved - alas, no.
          2. Scoun
            Scoun 30 August 2013 17: 06 New
            0
            Quote: lonely
            It remains to be hoped that

            the frostbitten position will give its coordinates and rockets on their heads will fall ...
            Quote: RETX
            I agree, snap back enough, but save yourself

            In the future, Israel will have to save.
            Quote: Pimply
            The possible participation of Arabs is not taken into account

            Not taken into account the possible participation of not only Arabs but also Iran, and the possibility of being drawn into the conflict of Egypt with all the ensuing
        2. Pimply
          Pimply 30 August 2013 11: 37 New
          0
          The possible participation of Arabs is not taken into account
      2. Pit
        Pit 30 August 2013 09: 56 New
        11
        Quote: il grand casino
        French migrants should be helped to start the struggle to overthrow the dictatorial government in Paris. Joke

        Well then you are a joke right away. It is said to help is to help. And they themselves will joke when the old guillotines from museums are being dragged to the palace squares.
        And also it would not hurt to help the Irish and the indigenous peoples of America liberate their lands from occupants.
      3. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 11: 14 New
        +1
        Quote: il grand casino
        . Joke

        Pity that joke wink
    2. Retx
      Retx 30 August 2013 09: 52 New
      +8
      The French will also run away. Citizens are not happy that France is again sending troops somewhere and do not understand why. I can even argue that the candidate from the National Front, most likely Marine Le Pen, will win the next election.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 12: 12 New
        0
        Quote: RETX
        I can even argue that the candidate from the National Front will win the next election, most likely Marine Le Pen.

        Yes, it seems like a sewing business request Yes, and it is necessary to live up to the elections, otherwise the whole world is in ruin with such democrats, how can I not do FIG belay
      2. Mikhail3
        Mikhail3 30 August 2013 13: 11 New
        +2
        Nineteen lesbians and a transvestite will perform, tell a teardrop about how Marina raped them. At the same time ... I wanted to write "in a perverted form", but there are no more of those in the geyrop. So what's even worse is not paying !!
        They will not allow this woman to win the election, for nothing. Not for such people, democracy was built ...
  4. Ruslan_F38
    Ruslan_F38 30 August 2013 09: 52 New
    +1
    "The Syrian war revealed a serious split in NATO, which speaks of an imminent crisis in the organization. We must add here that Washington was left at the most inopportune moment without its key ally, Britain." - the United States apparently does not give a damn about the opinion of its allies, they can strike without allies, and then the allies will "catch up." In extreme cases, they will arrange another provocation - maybe in Europe and the allies will immediately "jump".
    1. Refund_SSSR
      Refund_SSSR 30 August 2013 10: 08 New
      10
      In this case, Russia and China should declare themselves a peacekeeping contingent and knock down the Yankers tomahawks with a missile defense, than with anything ship-based :)
      It does not seem to be a war, but at the same time, assistance to Syria.
    2. Artyom
      Artyom 30 August 2013 10: 11 New
      +6
      of course they can hit, but I do not really want the amers of guano to take responsibility and criticism alone, and it seems like I'm not the only one like me with many more people, looking back, and there is already nobody there. And one is kind of sycotic. bully
      1. Muadipus
        Muadipus 30 August 2013 14: 05 New
        0
        of course they can hit, but I do not really want the amers of guano to take responsibility and criticism alone, and it seems like I'm not the only one like me with many more people, looking back, and there is already nobody there. And one is kind of sycotic. bully
        The Yankees are those Gopniks. alone never attack, only by the crowd.
    3. seller trucks
      seller trucks 30 August 2013 10: 18 New
      +4
      Quote: Ruslan_F38
      the Syrian war revealed a serious split in NATO, which indicates an overdue crisis in the organization. It should be added here that Washington was left at the most inopportune moment without its key ally, Britain. "


      Yesterday, the proof was thrown out: http://www.gegenfrage.com/russland-droht-mit-militaerschlag-gegen-saudi-arabien/
      "Russia threatens a military strike against Saudi Arabia" hat is not a hat, the second question. I read user comments (via Google translator), BB in authority:
      Phoenix
      28. August 2013 of the year at 16: 04
      I am sure this statement by Putin beeintrugt there are more people than we can imagine, a small ignorant citizen can only be made with such statements

      grillbert
      28. August 2013 of the year, at 18: 40
      ... One can only hope that Russia and China demonstrate strength.
      This is really the only US / UK / Israel Einleken way to bring fire to avoid!

      Despite all the modern (hochgestochener) knowledge in the sciences, there seems to be no peaceful coexistence.
      As Georg Schramm says, greed, thirst for power and greed are diabolical impulses.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urvK7_OCpjQ

      Pathfinder
      28. August 2013 of the year, at 18: 45
      I also like Putin, we are only here for the stupid sold there upstairs Bilderberger, Rockefeller and co.

      meckimercedes
      28. August 2013 of the year at 20: 10
      Judeo - Anglo-Saxon Saubande is the ultimate crazy!

      Peter Gudrun
      28. August 2013 of the year at 20: 35
      Heartfelt Thank you Mr. Putin. Allow yourself militaristic not embarrassed. This idiotic action of the West must be prevented. Saudi Arabia is sponsoring No. 1 of radical Islamists. And now let the West Assad rush regime? The subject stinks to heaven
    4. alone
      alone 30 August 2013 16: 14 New
      0
      Quote: Ruslan_F38
      the United States apparently does not give a damn about the opinion of its allies, they can strike without allies, and then the allies will "catch up." In extreme cases, they will arrange another provocation - maybe in Europe and the allies will immediately "jump".


      absolutely right. Considering the economic situation, provocations can be economic in nature. then they will definitely catch up.
    5. 31231
      31231 30 August 2013 19: 49 New
      0
      When will you already understand that sequestration is not a joke and amers cannot jump over it ?! So they are looking for someone to spin on waste.
  5. a52333
    a52333 30 August 2013 09: 57 New
    +3
    Yes, this is not a victory (no, well, let's say this is a small victory, and I like the trend) = this is a respite that needs to be rationally. The war is ahead.
  6. vezunchik
    vezunchik 30 August 2013 09: 58 New
    +3
    west like all jackal cowards. attack the weak in bulk. And they will feel rebuff to the bushes ....
  7. AleksUkr
    AleksUkr 30 August 2013 10: 06 New
    17
    Congress was also told that before the attack near Damascus, a movement of government troops was recorded, indicating "preparation of something serious like a chemical attack."
    And what will they say on such movements?
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 1 September 2013 20: 11 New
      +1
      Quote: AleksUkr
      And what will they say on such movements?

      Alexander Borisovich! good
  8. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 30 August 2013 10: 07 New
    +4
    Now we are witnessing a turning point in the recent history of world politics and the stakes are very high. The truth is on the side of Russia and many (in the west) are finally beginning to understand this, thank God.
  9. JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb 30 August 2013 10: 14 New
    +7
    Didn’t the “conscience" wake up among the British? Hardly. They had no conscience. But with the brain, everything is fine so far. And this is good. Because there is nothing worse than an unscrupulous and stupid government.

    Sincerely.
    1. alone
      alone 30 August 2013 10: 23 New
      +7
      any military operation requires certain expenses. no one wants to threaten so much money. It’s worth it now to tell the Americans that they will take all the costs for themselves, they’ll at least catch those who want to attack. Arab sheikhs can cover part of the costs. The fall of Syria will bring them a huge profit. And about conscience, in order to wake up, you must first have it)) the British did not have and will have no conscience
    2. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 30 August 2013 10: 32 New
      +6
      In English, there is no word conscience. No word, no conscience. They just want to keep a good face in a bad game.
      1. DEfindER
        DEfindER 30 August 2013 12: 27 New
        +1
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        In English, there is no word conscience. No word, no conscience.

        For the sake of interest, I found the word conscience in English, that is, the word is, but it means both “consciousness” and “conscience” .. for us, these are completely different concepts ..
    3. novobranets
      novobranets 30 August 2013 12: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: JIaIIoTb
      But with the brain, everything is fine so far. And this is good.

      In my opinion, an unscrupulous and cynical, but smart and cunning government, such as England, is much more dangerous than a dumb one. hi
      1. Just Vasilich
        Just Vasilich 30 August 2013 16: 51 New
        +3
        Gentlemen washed their aristocratic hands and offer Obama to drink a basin of dirty water himself. Obama is facing a Shakespearean question - drink or not drink?

        Russian folk tales warn: Don’t drink, Obama, you’ll become a kid! African American scapegoat of the Anglo-Saxon establishment.
  10. lexat7
    lexat7 30 August 2013 10: 19 New
    +1
    "Next, the president moved on to the American favorite method of evidence:" information analysis ":" An analysis of the information showed that this was the work of the Syrian authorities. And if so, there should be international consequences. " "So you, dear Obama, will decide whether this is so or not! Blaming the other window, you still leave for yourself."
  11. Krsk
    Krsk 30 August 2013 10: 21 New
    +5
    Well, Gauleiter of America Obersturmbanführer Barack Obama has opened. And it’s possible to play ahead of schedule not to let him go to St. Petersburg for the summit; these “supermen” were not allowed to enter there at 41 and now they have nothing to do there.
    1. dmit-xnumx
      dmit-xnumx 30 August 2013 10: 40 New
      +4
      That is, declare-for the whole world-Obama "persona non grata"? This, of course, is tempting, and if Obama begins military operations without the approval of the UN, then Putin can afford to "slap the slamming boorish boob".
      1. CTEPX
        CTEPX 30 August 2013 10: 44 New
        +4
        Quote: dmit-52
        That is, declare-for the whole world-Obama "persona non grata"?

        It is better to use the violation by the attackers of the foundations of international law on Syria to freeze a number of international treaties imposed on Russia)).
      2. Krsk
        Krsk 30 August 2013 11: 33 New
        0
        And it’s possible not in fact, but with a lead so that you don’t open your mouth for the future without thinking
  12. Lawless
    Lawless 30 August 2013 10: 41 New
    0
    2099? Will live?
  13. ReifA
    ReifA 30 August 2013 10: 44 New
    10
    “First we’ll plant, and there it will be seen for what” - approximately such associations are caused by the behavior of America, akin to a gangster in law. IMHO, if the blow takes place, on the UN, and on world politics you can put an end to. The medieval law of the strong taxis, the rest is for averting eyes. In such an environment, there can be no predictions for the future, because it is impossible to understand the sound mind of the abnormal.
    1. alone
      alone 30 August 2013 16: 07 New
      +2
      Quote: ReifA
      if the blow takes place, on the UN, and on world politics you can put an end to


      this cross has been put up for a long time. it’s just the whole office, which serially issues papers with resolutions that do not solve anything.
      1. fero
        fero 30 August 2013 18: 58 New
        +1
        It is true that the UN has not been deciding anything for a long time in serious situations. The American military uncles wanted to chatter for all these UN stuff, if politicians and the bourgeoisie would be profitable - they would be happy to spend part of the ammunition on another adventure, so that the defense industry would continue to pump up the budget, for example.
        1. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 19: 32 New
          0
          the same ass was with the league of nations, it ended all fucking
    2. Krsk
      Krsk 30 August 2013 19: 00 New
      0
      Quote: ReifA
      IMHO, if the blow takes place, on the UN, and on world politics you can put an end to.



      If Toko yet another cross on the belly to draw everything so formidable ("excited" lackeys, that their "great and terrible" pissy lord would grin on Syria), it would be seen. So there is a cross since 1999 standing with Yugoslavia ...
  14. Docklishin
    Docklishin 30 August 2013 10: 45 New
    +5
    I agree with MIKHAN 100% !!! hi Bold +. Indeed, it seems to me that a turning point is coming, which could radically change the world politics. As for England, Cameron landed a little and this cannot but rejoice. As for France, I really liked the idea of ​​activating residents from Algeria and other Muslim countries. And I think a lot is not necessary for their activation. It can concoct some provocation. Well, what ... if others can ... Starting cars will burn in the suburbs of Paris. You look, and there the French legislator will think about it. Statements in the Western press are also changing somewhat in favor of giving up hostilities, which is good news. It seems to me that, to complete the picture, a couple of demonstrations and news broadcasts in Europe are not enough to urge the UN and the inspectors to an objective investigation. The same slight pressure. Well, if ... what if ... there really is a thing in the world, and the UN recognizes that Assad did not use chemical weapons ... Then the GDP should be repeated like a Munich speech. It is advisable to compare the striped with the Nazis. This will be a BLOW. Ehh ... hi
  15. andrei332809
    andrei332809 30 August 2013 10: 45 New
    +1
    wash the black male to white - this is the whole way of Britons and their last
  16. deman73
    deman73 30 August 2013 10: 47 New
    0
    Honored Peacemaker decided to work out the Peace Prize
  17. Fornit
    Fornit 30 August 2013 10: 49 New
    +6
    It is necessary to begin a new Nuremberg trial about Adolf Obama ... And to the heap there of all the previous mattress "peacekeepers" - there are all kinds of Bush. Dracula, damn it, their tudes in a swing ... Why did the whole world put their tongue in the ass? Few all Yugoslavia with Iraq?
    I support the proposal to deploy an anti-ballistic shield in neutral waters of Russia and China, at the same time getting rid of obsolete ammunition (following the example of amers) and try a new one ... An unexpected move. This is not a war, but definitely a humanitarian mission!
    1. CTEPX
      CTEPX 30 August 2013 10: 53 New
      +3
      Quote: Fornit
      I support the proposal to deploy a missile shield in neutral waters of Russia and China

      This is not an offer, this is a fact)). Warships are required to destroy, flying in their direction, means of destruction)).
      1. novobranets
        novobranets 30 August 2013 12: 30 New
        0
        Quote: ctepx
        Warships are required to destroy, flying in their direction, means of destruction)).

        If the attacker warned these ships that they were not the target of the attack, and that these ships would use weapons to destroy these weapons, then this could be regarded (and most likely will be) as an armed intervention, otherwise a declaration of war. hi
        1. CTEPX
          CTEPX 30 August 2013 16: 04 New
          +2
          Quote: novobranets
          If the attacker warned

          You know, we have a connection - a weak spot)).
          1. novobranets
            novobranets 30 August 2013 17: 51 New
            0
            It's not gonna go. They will not answer the radio request (which cannot be), the attackers will push forward something fast (a boat, a light destroyer) and duplicate it with a semaphore. Not everyone on the ship is blind.
            1. CTEPX
              CTEPX 30 August 2013 18: 00 New
              0
              Quote: novobranets
              Not everyone on the ship is blind.

              There is such Russian fun - drunken walk)). There would be strong eggs, but we can beat the rockets flying at us)).
              1. novobranets
                novobranets 30 August 2013 18: 16 New
                0
                If only an empty container. laughing
                1. CTEPX
                  CTEPX 30 August 2013 18: 42 New
                  0
                  Quote: novobranets
                  If only an empty container.

                  I will convey your words to our sailors)).
    2. igor06161
      igor06161 30 August 2013 18: 54 New
      0
      Well Well, it's time for the Chinese to overpower the land of America!
  18. Paul
    Paul 30 August 2013 11: 05 New
    +3
    Obama’s stalemate: hit - bad, don’t hit - bad too, Dove of Peace
    1. Andrew 447
      Andrew 447 30 August 2013 11: 25 New
      +2
      allow myself a remark on your post "HAWK OF THE WORLD"
      1. Anatolich
        Anatolich 30 August 2013 13: 54 New
        +1
        blue of the world
  19. Docklishin
    Docklishin 30 August 2013 11: 07 New
    +1
    Unfortunately we do not have time to set the ships. And without China and Iran, this will lose all meaning. I am very sorry about this. Ps on the theme of Adolf Obama +. Why they do not reckon with the UN, if someone affects their interests. Here are the Saudis, for example, our interests have long been affected. Well, so, for consideration.
  20. komsomolets
    komsomolets 30 August 2013 11: 08 New
    +2
    It seems like it’s gone ... Americans give in, they are disgraced all over the world, they were not lucky with the black president, in their entire history no one has been so stupid as Barack. They forgot the old truth-waved-beat.
    1. Alan
      Alan 30 August 2013 18: 01 New
      +1
      Quote: komsomolets
      no luck with the little black president

      for them it’s bad luck .. but for us, the hunchbacked tragedy became am
      Although it’s possible, it’s not yet evening.
  21. Evgeny_Lev
    Evgeny_Lev 30 August 2013 11: 12 New
    0
    “Most likely, when the guilty, perhaps not quite sure, and we know it for sure, then the world community must definitely be confirmed by 100% reliable sources who prefer to remain anonymous, we will bomb anyway !!!”

    This is a fantasy on the subject of substantiation of the decision to start the bombing by the "world peeders".
  22. SvetoRus
    SvetoRus 30 August 2013 11: 15 New
    +2
    Since the Mess of Deception will still meet with Putin at the G20 summit. That is expected to publicly drag the "black kitten", with his face poked into his own "puddles" and a statement to the whole world that -Fu so be !!
    1. Fornit
      Fornit 30 August 2013 11: 23 New
      0
      Yeah, dreaming ... How would Vovchik drag out for obstinacy ...
      The West is even more subtle than the East ...
      1. SvetoRus
        SvetoRus 30 August 2013 11: 34 New
        0
        They tried already in Ireland. However, it was unsuccessful. laughing
      2. an_ursus
        an_ursus 30 August 2013 11: 36 New
        +3
        What is it to him? ... Like water from a goose ... Behind him is the truth and the whole World ...
  23. wax
    wax 30 August 2013 11: 21 New
    +4
    Test tube powell - The beginning and end of US hegemony for collecting, interpreting and evaluating evidence. We are present at the moral bankruptcy of the United States, which is stronger than the failure of the Yankees on one or another front. This is a sure sign of the beginning of sunset.
    See also http://warfiles.ru/show-37559-ardzhil-terner-himicheskaya-ataka-v-sirii-pozornyy
    -proval-specsluzhb-ssha-i-britanii.html
    1. sarmat-4791
      sarmat-4791 31 August 2013 22: 51 New
      0
      Yes, I remember how it was shown on TV - they waved a test tube with something white to the UN (like - they brought WMDs directly from Iraq 2 hours ago), but now they don’t wave something (apparently they lost the treasured test tube)
  24. Proximo
    Proximo 30 August 2013 11: 28 New
    +3
    the states have already gone too far and are now unlikely to back down from a strike on Syria. True, it will sooner be an exponential strike and not very powerful. Such a strike will not break the general picture and the army will be able to complete the headquarters plans. The main thing is to close the border tightly. God help Syria, the Army Assad!
    1. CTEPX
      CTEPX 30 August 2013 11: 42 New
      +2
      Quote: Proximo
      True, it will likely be a show blow and not very powerful.

      Demonstration blow will not save them. They need to reformat all BV states. To start)).
  25. USNik
    USNik 30 August 2013 11: 42 New
    +2
    The "allies" have only "clownish" attempts to justify the invasion, for example, to lure some corrupt Syrian military man to his side, who will say with foam at the mouth that with these hands he sprayed sarin on the direct personal order of Assad. no
  26. KOH
    KOH 30 August 2013 12: 07 New
    0
    Quote: RETX
    August 29, Riga
    The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia was ready to help on its own in the destruction of al-Assad government troops
    In this regard, the Latvian naval raft and air kite are put on high alert.


    Well, neighing ... thanks.
    1. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 30 August 2013 12: 15 New
      +1
      Akhtung, Akhtung latvshe Zmei in der luft-Assad, come on!
  27. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 30 August 2013 12: 13 New
    +2
    Ah da Carla, ah yes del Ponte ah yes well done. Well, after all, maybe when you need to stand up for justice, for real justice!
  28. Bambino
    Bambino 30 August 2013 12: 18 New
    +1
    In the process, Obama will chew on a tie like Mishko and while away long evenings in splendid isolation.
  29. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 30 August 2013 12: 19 New
    +1
    This planned mess poses a direct threat to our people vacationing in Turkey. Why are they still not being saved?
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 12: 21 New
      +3
      Quote: Sergey Medvedev
      Why are they still not being saved?

      so it will be necessary to save the Turks from ours, and if they still bring up beer, they will definitely be our straits
  30. Curt
    Curt 30 August 2013 12: 25 New
    +8
    I have been reading this site for a long time and registered just recently to express my opinion) Maybe it already sounded somewhere in some form, but still: why do all the same Americans get into Syria?
    The site had many articles about the fact that with a “clean face” the United States could not get out of the Syrian conflict. They planned that at the end of their geopolitics on bl. in the east there will be a barrel with oil, gas, and a row of puppets near it, and before going out you need to plunge into it) Now there is a barrel with, excuse me, shit, and you still need to swim. What Americans are trying to do now is to dip only part of their face. I will explain. Here they have 2 exits -
    1) The Americans promised to help the rebels. Rebels lose, help ("non-lethal" aha) - doesn't work, Russia and China block all resolutions. To retreat is to throw the rebels to their fate and therefore ditch the money and 2 years spent on Syria = plunge into that very barrel and again lose to Putin who has already turned his nose next to the barrel (the situation with Snowdem) and a bunch of all kinds of other goodies like Magnitsky’s list / law Dima Yakovlev.
    2) Help the rebels - again pour a lot of money into an unnecessary war - but to some extent save face and at least not let Putin dip himself into the barrel again. War is war, but not Putin! wink But there is no money, the people are against, NATO, too, doesn’t want it, and Britain - I think that for the United States it is for us Belarus will not participate either!
    And then I had an interesting thought about what the USA really wants to do:
    They have already said that the war will be different from the wars in Iraq and Libya. And they said that their goal was not to kill Assad, (since this would greatly worsen relations with Moscow), therefore, help the rebels, as they promised them. They really will help - well, they will send 300 axes to military facilities - "have we all helped you? You helped. Then you yourself." There are also additional advantages for America: from the situation with Syria came out almost without losing face, did they help the rebels? helped. Moscow ally spoiled life? spoiled. Helped the gun lobby in the US? helped. Are you scared of Putin? they intimidated him because he hasn’t been giving a pass recently. Have you got any military experience? received . Well, let it flew a pretty penny - the person is the main thing, but we owe a lot of money - to the heap, and what are we going to give away? :))))) But no, so if anyone wants to return their money or gold let him tell us about it in the face of 1500 warheads.
    Like this . Now about Putin, who is "silent" in the Far East. There was an article that he is in geopolitics like a fish in the water - is repelled by events, decides not often, but correctly. Right now, just the moment when the event has not yet occurred, there is nothing to start from, therefore, as soon as the first tomahawk arrives on Syrian land, we should wait for statements from Putin. So far, everything that Americans do — they scratch their tongue, and in my opinion — they do it better than all the nations. "Champions of chatter" schob them .. Thank you for reading) albeit clumsily, but 1 time)

    ps Yes, and about the Saudis and Turkey, other under-arms - Here they can just arrange a full-scale war like jackals to prey, and the US will “protect” them from aircraft carriers, and if something is not us, they’re all there and we’re here by no means
    1. KG_patriot_last
      KG_patriot_last 30 August 2013 13: 13 New
      +1
      You're right. On two conclusions for the United States, but did not draw conclusions for Russia.

      But tomahawks just the same for Russia in principle means a loss, because the position is: NOT interference. Bombing is any interference. So for Russia there is no difference: the land part of the operation will be or not. There is a difference for the USA, but not for Russia.

      So Putin, if he wants to make something positive for Russia out of this whole situation, he must definitely make sure that there is no bombing.
      Otherwise, it will still mean the US leadership in the world again and they will spit on the UN Security Council and international law. Russia will lose allies by agreement - after all, international law does not work, why negotiate with someone, if it doesn’t work in a critical situation.

      For example, why should the Kyrgyz Republic close Manas in exchange for finances if, when attacked and dismembered by US-sponsored terrorists, we still lose this money? And we have a bunch of politicians and hucksters for a long time not steer - we will throw off anyone who will act not in the interests of our people.
      1. CTEPX
        CTEPX 30 August 2013 16: 23 New
        0
        Quote: KG_patriot_last
        But tomahawks just for Russia in principle means a loss

        For Russia, there is one gain - time)).
        The Anglo-Skuns, in aggregate, lose, for every day of life in today's reality, 1 billion cut paper. So far no one has asked - this is paper.
        If the tomahawks bring us time - this is not a loss)).
  31. Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 30 August 2013 12: 34 New
    +1
    Amers really need Syrian gas, oil, territory. Gas and oil are understandable, but the territory, which would stretch its branch to Europe. But there will come a moment when they choke, completely.
  32. pensioner
    pensioner 30 August 2013 12: 34 New
    +4
    Thanks Oleg!
    1) The USA is no longer pulled by the hegemon and world gendarme, even one zilch from the former political decisiveness; 2) the Syrian war revealed a serious split in NATO, which indicates an overdue crisis in the organization. It should be added here that Washington was left at the most inopportune moment without its key ally, Britain.- That's right. but I want to add more from myself. But they began to reckon with Russia! I recall how in 99, before the bombing of Yugoslavia, our leaders would not say anything, but they did not even pay attention to them. Type: "These are our European affairs. And who are you?" Complete disregard for the opinion of not the latest country in resolving world issues. And now, who only did not communicate with Putin about Syria! And not for proforma ... And yet. I do not exclude that the GDP regarding Syria has something in reserve. And he shared something with someone ... As a result, half-NATs went into denial ...
  33. novobranets
    novobranets 30 August 2013 12: 39 New
    +6
    Well, dad. have you killed many other dads?
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2013/680/slgj754.jpg Этой девочке повезло, её папа вернулся живым. Но это не может продолжаться бесконечно. Однажды домой привезут гроб накрытый полосатой тряпкой. Грёбанный черномазый клоун, когда нибудь проклятья сирот и вдов его настигнут. am
    1. CTEPX
      CTEPX 30 August 2013 16: 11 New
      0
      Quote: novobranets
      Fucking black clown

      Not these chuvachkov need to run into)). Especially in the photo - pale-faced)).
      Say something about politicians)).
      1. novobranets
        novobranets 30 August 2013 16: 34 New
        0
        Quote: ctepx
        Fucking black clown

        Obama is implied, I thought, and so it is.
        1. CTEPX
          CTEPX 30 August 2013 16: 51 New
          +1
          Quote: novobranets
          Implied obama

          Yes, and Obama is similar to these ... The order is the order)).
          1. novobranets
            novobranets 30 August 2013 17: 54 New
            0
            Obama has a greater degree of freedom.
            1. CTEPX
              CTEPX 30 August 2013 18: 05 New
              0
              Quote: novobranets
              Obama has a greater degree of freedom.

              Oh, do not tell)).
  34. akreworpa
    akreworpa 30 August 2013 13: 03 New
    +1
    I believe that the amers are still afraid to attack alone. But they have Saudis. In the event of our attack, in order to save face, we must at least shoot down missiles.
    1. KG_patriot_last
      KG_patriot_last 30 August 2013 13: 21 New
      0
      It seems that Jordan and Iraq have closed terrorism to attack Syria. The Saudis and aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf can not do anything in this situation ...

      But instead of the Saudis there are Ottomans. Northern and marine directions from Cyprus are more real.
  35. Kovrovsky
    Kovrovsky 30 August 2013 13: 27 New
    +2
    Quote: We refund_SSSR
    From Wikipedia Latvian Air Force:
    The Air Force has 319 troops, three aircraft (one L-410 and two An-2) and six helicopters (four Mi-17 and two Mi-2)

    From Wikipedia of the Latvian Navy:
    The naval forces consist of 587 troops [7] and five ships, the main task of which is the clearance of territorial waters.

    Where?! Where are they going ?!
    Parade of crazy laughing

    Latvia wants to admonish and become Uncle Sam's "beloved wife". When will such an opportunity be presented! wassat
    1. rus9875
      rus9875 30 August 2013 13: 51 New
      +4
      Just yesterday, a bunch of people were barking at Putin - like, he surrendered Assad, Syria and in general, like, disappeared somewhere at the most crucial moment of the Criticism ay, where did you go? Doesn't he call Merkel, Kerry
      They call him the Iranian Prime Minister. And he went to the Far East to deal with the flood. Guys have reason to be proud of our president and our country - just look how skillfully he put Obama in a puddle again
  36. de bouillon
    de bouillon 30 August 2013 14: 05 New
    +7
    August 29, Riga
    The President of Latvia at the next meeting said that Latvia is ready to help on its own in the destruction of the Assad government forces

    In this regard, the Latvian naval raft and air kite are put on high alert.
    1. novobranets
      novobranets 30 August 2013 17: 59 New
      +1
      laughing laughing laughing Already the heart stops, looking at entomu power ... Or power? wassat
    2. Proud.
      Proud. 30 August 2013 19: 50 New
      +2
      Weak. In the 30th heap we had:
  37. Micex
    Micex 30 August 2013 14: 30 New
    +2
    It looks like nonsense. If we assume that the amers did not want to attack Syria at all, but only tried to scare Russia before 20k and use this moment as a bargain, now they don’t even bargain, well, this is nonsense - they all unanimously say that this is not Assad is to blame, and the militants, the British are trying to drag out time or jump off altogether, and the hut is looking for allies. Who will he take as allies, the Baltic governments, or what ??? it's crazy. There’s nothing to bargain with; their own allies are disowning amers. I have 2 thoughts:
    1) or the amers have finally moved their minds, stopped thinking, swept over and do not have any idea what to do next (which I strongly doubt)
    2) either they are plotting a specific dirty trick, but now they just put to sleep vigilance. Here is an important point - Putin’s actions - he escaped as far as possible during the escalation - to the Far East, like, move your boats / planes, I don’t pay attention to you. It certainly impresses.
  38. gregor6549
    gregor6549 30 August 2013 15: 55 New
    +4
    The situation of those that "if you can’t, but really want, then you can." And the saddest thing is that a person who poorly understands what he is doing, but who imagines himself that he understands everything, is trying to steer the situation. As a result, instead of secular and more or less adequate power in Syria, the world can get such a headache in that region that it cannot get rid of for decades.
    It seems to me that the only way out in this situation would be the signing of an agreement on mutual assistance, including military, between Syria and Russia. This will not lead to a war between the USA and Russia, but it can very well cool someone’s kinky head in a barracks.
  39. Curt
    Curt 30 August 2013 16: 00 New
    +3
    Quote: KG_patriot_last
    You're right. On two conclusions for the United States, but did not draw conclusions for Russia.

    But tomahawks just the same for Russia in principle means a loss, because the position is: NOT interference. Bombing is any interference. So for Russia there is no difference: the land part of the operation will be or not. There is a difference for the USA, but not for Russia.

    So Putin, if he wants to make something positive for Russia out of this whole situation, he must definitely make sure that there is no bombing.
    Otherwise, it will still mean the US leadership in the world again and they will spit on the UN Security Council and international law. Russia will lose allies by agreement - after all, international law does not work, why negotiate with someone, if it doesn’t work in a critical situation.

    For example, why should the Kyrgyz Republic close Manas in exchange for finances if, when attacked and dismembered by US-sponsored terrorists, we still lose this money? And we have a bunch of politicians and hucksters for a long time not steer - we will throw off anyone who will act not in the interests of our people.



    For Russia, as I believe, as soon as the United States starts a war, it is necessary to start supplying Assad with modern weapons, even at a loss, it is also necessary to provide Assad with satellite information and intelligence as the United States did for Georgia in the war on 08.08.08/2/1. Why are we worse? Russia said that it wouldn’t fit into the war itself, and that’s just so - we have nothing to do there, but to support Assad is necessary in full, and if someone speaks we have warned you for 2 years - now do not blame me. Ideally - (but this is out of my imagination) to sink 1-5 warships, and preferably an aircraft carrier with all the stuffing, after that the United States will have to intervene in this war on a large scale with a ground operation, and arrange for them there in Afghanistan Syria for the USSR they did. Of course, many people will die. But will this be the first time that human lives have been brought to achieve the goals of the States? Yes it is in any war. For them, wars are now humanitarian interventions because they haven’t been given a nose shot for a long time. They need to be weaned out to conduct such operations, otherwise they have completely lost their fear and forgot what war is (like in Vietnam, which they still remember shuddering.) The last XNUMX lines are already a cry of the soul)

    and accordingly, in addition to material losses, it is necessary to wage an information war - like from the Tomahawk bombs and so on. Masses of people are dying - let the people of the United States know what their democracy really brings, not to stop constantly incriminating the United States in murders and so on. Let the power of the Information War feel on your own skin, the benefit of RT is now there)
    1. KG_patriot_last
      KG_patriot_last 30 August 2013 17: 55 New
      +1
      You are right about everything again. Absolutely. But again they ignored that Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and France, for example, want to invade the land. They do not want to fight a strong army alone. But if:
      1) Assad’s positions will be damaged, possibly with the elimination of key commanders
      2) Syrian air defense will be suppressed
      3) Syrian military airfields will be bombed, possibly with a fleet of vehicles
      4) Artillery positions will be bombed

      That is, Syria will be equalized in capabilities with the militants and the opposition (which they have and they have territories), there will be no restraining factors for the neighbors. They will not need a UN mandate. Perhaps their mission will even be called peacekeeping or peace enforcement.

      De facto, it will be the liquidation of the current authorities and the dismemberment of Syria. Accordingly, the damage to Russia's position in the world. Russia has very few leverage over Saudi, Qatar. For Turkey there is, but the backward lever is greater.
  40. Luga
    Luga 30 August 2013 16: 08 New
    +2
    According to the changed tone of comments, as I understand it, the forum users have relaxed and are already expecting almost a complete military-political collapse of the drums and everything connected with it. It's too early, bye, IMHO. Europe, of course, did not support these gopniks, but it’s still very, very far from any major changes, significant shifts in the centers of power. PoloSaty are quite capable of resolving the "Syrian issue" and alone, if they have bitten a bit, they will trample on a buffet. Neither Russia nor China will enter into an open conflict (and rightly, IMHO), and despite all the protests of the "world community" Assad will turn his neck and impose his government in Syria. Pickets near the white house will be dispersed by water cannons and they will begin to prepare the same for Iran. The worst thing is that they can afford it. The only thing they cannot afford is to stop, that’s how their economy, their consciousness, their way of life are arranged — that’s all.
    They need to be beaten. By all means and means. And now, unfortunately, there is no one to do this.

    Special thanks to the author of RETX for the raft and the snake. Until now, as I recall, smiles :-)

    PS
    And I'm a little sorry for the drums. I can imagine how he doesn’t want to fight and what pressure is exerted on him from all sorts of Lokhids, etc. But still he burned in hell, along with all the creatures that stood behind him and pulled the strings.
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 30 August 2013 16: 30 New
      +1
      PoloSaty are quite capable of resolving the "Syrian issue" and alone, if they have bitten a bit, they will trample on a buffet.

      There are buffets that can be broken forehead. If aid to Syria comes with weapons and ammunition, blocking sea approaches, economic sanctions against the United States, the latter will not be able to crank out their scam. Just not enough strength and money. Coffins delivered to the United States by conveyor will undermine the already shaky, trust of ordinary Americans. And let thunder strike ....
    2. 31231
      31231 30 August 2013 20: 11 New
      +1
      Where are the trampled striped ?! What are you about?! The money for a full-fledged war is dumb, Obama's leadership rating is the same as that of his protégé Navalny. Citizens of NATO countries tasted the "feats" on the video of the opposition. And they formed an opinion for whom their leadership wants to harness themselves. For the first time after Vietnam, we can say that in the West there are more and more citizens, not vegetables.
  41. Vorkot cat
    Vorkot cat 30 August 2013 16: 09 New
    +3
    Everything secret sooner or later becomes apparent. We are well aware of how our "partners" from the so-called "civilized" countries decide their geopolitical interests. Chemical weapons cannot be found in Iraq until now. Lack of ingenuity and imagination leads to the fact that British private military corporations, by order of powerful forces, decided to "find" ancient chemical weapons from the USSR, which supposedly the Russian military had to put in Syria and, completely "accidentally" burned in this matter. But before all the well-known handshake media holdings had sharpened the barrel of the lens, something happened that disavowed the "civilized" thugs ...

    The other day, mail was hacked by the British private military corporation Britam Defense, which provides the military interests of firms such as British Petrolium and HALLIBURTON. It turned out that smartly impossible British mercenaries decided to take advantage of the corrupt citizens of Ukraine, dress them in Russians and suddenly expose them with chemical weapons in their hands in Syria. How about you, huh?

    How to prepare a provocation against Russia in Syria ...

    A great war always begins with provocation. Remember the Nazi invasion of Poland or the assassination of Prince Franz Ferdinand on June 28, 1914 in Sarajevo.

    Britain has never been an ally or partner of Russia. She always just pretended, because Britain has no permanent friends - only permanent interests.

    For hundreds of years of its existence, the mercenary empire has driven itself elbows into the blood of other nations. She doesn’t get used to it. And all this in white gloves and a grimace of a smile on his face.

    The so-called "world community" once again showed its true face. Worthy students of Dr. Goebbels. It is not for nothing that the majority of the SS personnel mysteriously scattered across Western countries, avoiding the Nuremberg process.
  42. Fastblast
    Fastblast 30 August 2013 16: 25 New
    +3
    Great Britain refused attack on Syria

    The inhabitants of London defended their position regarding military intervention in Syria. For two days, they held rallies organized by the Stop the War movement. And although British Prime Minister David Cameron advocated the need for military intervention in the internal affairs of Syria, the parliament ...
  43. JonnyT
    JonnyT 30 August 2013 16: 50 New
    0
    It’s strange like that ....... did they really turn on the shit-screeners?
    Or are all these provocations and high-profile statements just a way to probe the Russian Federation and China?
    One thing is for sure - everything is going according to plan - according to the plan of controlled chaos. Somewhere war, somewhere epidemic, somewhere economic ruin.

    All the same, a blow to Syria will be dealt. The United States will bomb the Tomahawks (unless of course the Tomahawk boats go to the bottom of the sea). The USA, as it were, provokes other countries to be the first - to be meat and bear the burden of expenses. But no one wants to bring Assad heroically overwhelming Assad with the corpses of his soldiers and the wreckage of his equipment .... plus the whole gop company “pours” Russia and China.
    For them, in order to make at least some decision, it is necessary to calculate the reaction of the Russian Federation and China, create instructions for their aircraft, calculate all possible options
  44. dojjdik
    dojjdik 30 August 2013 16: 52 New
    0
    the split in NATO is nonsense; and Obama is all deprived of the "scapegoat" in the capture of Syria; behind him is financial capital; Of course, the switchman Obama will be to blame; although all state condoms have six big business capital and the heads of other states will find it useless to meet them; The UN has long become obsolete and needs to be disbanded
  45. Irokez
    Irokez 30 August 2013 17: 24 New
    +3
    A split in a wolf pack is good of course, but nothing has been specifically decided yet, and you can expect anything from an angry beast and he can perform the most inappropriate actions purely instinctively without thinking about the consequences.
    It is necessary to delay time for Russia from the US strike on Syria and during this time more weapons and ammunition to be put there, because if a small attack with cruise missiles starts, it is not known whether it will stop and whether it will continue under various pretexts.
    I would like for Syria to have more air defense systems and updated versions of the old air defense, but more effective. In addition, several anti-satellite missiles and anti-ship, electronic warfare systems of various systems for the disorientation of homing bombs and missiles, unmanned reconnaissance vehicles to identify fighters in cities and fields. To help a little Kurds in the north with conventional small arms because they are the shield of the north.
    It would be nice to come to an agreement in Lebanon and put your own radar there to illuminate everything that moves and is immovable, to support Egypt in its endeavors by taking a step towards any help, to remind Iraq of the supply of arms as well, and to Turk a little to besiege the Kurdish problem as in Turkey itself and in Syria and Iraq, promising to recognize Kurdistan if proclaimed.
    There are many levers of pressure and intervention in different situations, the main thing is not to go too far and not refuse your offers and promises in the future creating an image of a judicious, executive and demanding state working in the UN legal field. That is, everyone sees who is either talkers and jackals, or sober people firmly walking through life and who can always be relied on. Right now, you can rely on Russia rather than on the USA and Europe with most of Asia. And the image just doesn’t come, it is necessary to earn and work it out. Even ordinary people in the West see in the GDP, and therefore in Russia, a growing and establishing pole as a counterbalance to tolerant obscurantist Europe, and if Russia on this wave does not give slack in the information and nervous struggle, then the BRICS will stretch towards us by our modern country, and therefore and there may be a new currency a competitor of the current, the collapse of the old and the emergence of new political and military alliances and blocs.
    So much for Vanga’s predictions and the rise of Russia, not as the strongest in economics and armaments, but as the most balanced and spiritual country in politics and affairs, and in this showing the whole world in which direction we need to move in the future, with whom to make friends and from whom to step aside . That is, Russia turns out to save the world and show the path on which to go.
    Even if Syria falls in front of the enemy, it will show who is worth what and it will be a rethinking throughout the world of how democracy is being done throughout the world and those who are uninterested in this problem will suddenly see and draw their conclusions. But after Syria, most likely no one will climb on Iran because Iran is not Syria and the methods of influence will be well known and, accordingly, counteraction will be much more effective than right now.
    In general, you can’t relax and you need to support Syria as long as possible until a strike is launched against the SSA and the militants if they cross the line with chemical fuels.
  46. Djubal
    Djubal 30 August 2013 17: 59 New
    +1
    Quote: Fastblast
    Great Britain refused attack on Syria

    Oh, my feeling is unkind ... the mattresses alone are robbing ... the geyropeyts turn away in embarrassment ... So they will be persuaded, there will be "Assad's sarin attacks" already in Europe ... the crushmen will get away ... I sincerely hope to make a mistake in the forecasts ...
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 30 August 2013 18: 05 New
      0
      Quote: Djubal
      ... So they will be persuaded, there will be "Assad's sarin attacks" already in Europe ...

      the main thing is not on the northern border of pshekia, otherwise it is 20 km from me
    2. The comment was deleted.
  47. kotvov
    kotvov 30 August 2013 18: 08 New
    0
    Yes, they are feminine dogs, and I hope all this spills out, the ruling elite of the Americans.
  48. saag
    saag 30 August 2013 18: 11 New
    0
    there will be frames on YouTube like rockets start in the night sky, video of fireballs of explosions, tracers of anti-aircraft guns, etc.
  49. The comment was deleted.
  50. fero
    fero 30 August 2013 19: 09 New
    +1
    In the case of attacks on Syria, it would not be bad for Russia, but what thread is it better for a third-party state ... for example, Iran UN General Assembly to raise the issue of condemning the United States and its policies. It is clear that such a decision essentially does not mean anything, unlike the UN Security Council resolution, but the political slap will be strong laughing