Military Review

Dr. Abbas Khalaf: “The West Put Iran on the“ Little Fire ”

6
Dr. Abbas Khalaf: “The West Put Iran on the“ Little Fire ”

At the presidential elections, the people of Iran supported the candidature of Hassan Rouhani by a majority of votes. More than 50% votes were cast for him.


Adhering to moderate views, Hassan Rouhani managed in the first round to leave behind his conservative rivals and avoid the second round of voting.

Last Saturday, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seid Ali Khamenei approved Rouhani in office.

An internationally known international politician, Middle East specialist, diplomat, former Iraqi ambassador to Moscow, a member of the Association of Iraqi Translators, Writers and Journalists, who has worked as a direct translator and adviser to Saddam for 20 years, shared his opinion on the policy of Iran Hussein, Dr. Abbas Khalaf.

Dr. Abbas, in your opinion, why did the Iranian people vote for Rouhani?

- The Iranian people went for Rouhani, in the hope that it will normalize relations with neighboring countries, will correct the mistakes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s tough policy. The economic situation of Iran is largely dependent on imports, and exports have decreased by almost half. As a result of the rule of the previous president, Iran was completely isolated. Hassan Rouhani in his official speech outlined, one can say, the main aspirations of the people: economic recovery, constructive cooperation with other countries and, as he put it, “the return of ethics to politics”. According to him, the Iranian people "want a decent life and are tired of poverty and corruption."

But here, as they say, time will show what Rouhani’s actions will be, not in words, but in deeds.

Rouhani, in his inaugural speech, proclaimed a course of detente, negotiation and reduction of tension. The essence of his speech was that the basis for minimizing confrontation is a constructive dialogue, that is, Rouhani, as the new leader of Iran, positions himself as a moderate politician. Dr. Abbas, do you agree with this?

- This is his official statement ... I think he wanted to show his flexibility as a politician, to emphasize that his course will differ from the course of his predecessor, who went to confrontation not only with the West, but even with Arab states. I believe that despite such a confident statement by Rouhani, America and the West will wait for concrete cases and continue to put pressure on Iran to give up its nuclear program and, as they say, “interfere” in the internal affairs of other countries.

In his official speech, the new Iranian president did not say anything about the nuclear program ... In your opinion, this was done intentionally, thereby emphasizing that Iran’s political course is peacefulness, pliability and prudence, or Rouhani will still keep Iran’s nuclear program and all the geopolitical advantages gained since the time of the US invasion of Iraq?

- I think Iran will not abandon its nuclear program, especially since this program has advanced, and Iran is on the verge of obtaining a nuclear weapons. Although Rouhani and bypassed this issue in his official speech, he believes that the nuclear program is a guarantee of preserving the integrity and independence of Iran, especially since he has a bitter example of Iraq that does not have nuclear weapons, which led to American expansion. Considering my diplomatic experience, I believe that if Iran will make concessions on some issues, then this program will never. And another very important, we can say the main point in this matter: the decision on the nuclear program does not belong to Rouhani, but belongs to the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who, by the Iranian system, is the first person in the state, and the president is the second.

Dr. Abbas, do you think that with the coming to power of Rouhani the end of the Islamic revolution in Iran came?

- The fact is that a spiritual Islamic system is already working in Iran, and the president, as I said, is the second person in the state. The word of the people is what the spiritual leader said. Therefore, to talk about the end of the Islamic era in Iran is too hasty conclusions. I want to note that there is still a confrontation in Iran: on the one hand, the United States and the West with economic sanctions, on the other hand, Iran supports Bashar Assad. In addition, the Hezbollah party in southern Lebanon is an integral part of the weapons of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, and the fighters of this party are fighting on the side of Assad. Iran has serious problems with neighboring countries, for example, with Iraq, the countries of the Persian Gulf.

Causes?

- The fact is that Iran is an apologist for the ideology of Ayatollah Khomeini - the leader of the Islamic revolution 1979 of the year in Iran. For example, the events in Bahrain ... Iran sided with the Shiite rebels, and the predecessor of Rouhani Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, being president, announced that Bahrain is part of Iran. Further, Iran spreads Shiism in Yemen, Iran has problems with the north, because it supports Shiites in Sudan, Iran tries to spread Shiism even in Egypt. For this reason, in due time, diplomatic relations between Tehran and Cairo were interrupted, and only after the coming to power of Mursi, the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, were these relations resumed. And immediately the confrontation began, because the majority of the population of Egypt is Sunni Muslim.

And at the same time, one of the first statements by the new Iranian President Hassan Rouhani was the frank support of the Syrian regime. At a meeting with Syrian Prime Minister Wael al-Halki, Rouhani stated that "no force can destroy the friendship of the two countries ..."

- I think that the reason for such support of the Bashar Assad regime from Iran is that it considers Syria as a front in the fight against the United States. Iran does not want to fight on its territory. Most recently, Tehran provided Syria with a loan of 3,5 billion dollars, and this despite the difficult situation in Iran itself. Iran understands that if the end of the ruling regime in Damascus comes, sooner or later it will be a turn to become hostage to the United States or terrorists. In addition to financial support, Iran has a very strong military lever in this region - the Hazballa party, which is fighting on the side of the troops of Bashar al-Assad.

Iran’s chairman of the expediency council, Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, noted that a new era had begun in Iran’s foreign policy based on mutual respect and trust. Judging by the speech of Rouhani, he is ready to make concessions even from the USA. In your opinion, how will the new Iranian relations with the West?

- The United States and the West put Iran, figuratively speaking, on a “small fire”.

What does this mean?

- The fact is that now in Iran there are very serious social problems. The United States and the West are planning to tighten economic sanctions, and then, taking their policies in Iraq as an example, will take control of the country. The West hopes for the continuation of the same course that they used in Iraq, justifying their actions by the 7 chapter of the UN Charter. But now China and Russia have not allowed to adopt this resolution in relation to Iran. Today, Washington does not have, as politicians say, an international umbrella.

How will Rouhani’s election affect bilateral cooperation with Russia? What are the prospects for Russian-Iranian relations? Your opinion…

- Iran has always been and remains for Russia an important partner in this region. In September, Russian President Vladimir Putin is scheduled to visit Iran, and there is hope that cooperation will be established on many issues, including the construction of nuclear power plants. Tehran held consultations with Moscow, and in the near future an agreement on the construction of a nuclear power plant in Iran will be signed. Iran has very few allies and the establishment of normal relations with Russia for the development of bilateral economic relations is the right way to solve many social problems in the country. I think the Iranian leadership is well aware of this.

Dr. Abbas, thanks for the chat.
Author:
6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. experienced
    experienced 16 August 2013 16: 31 New
    +4
    The burner with the "big fire" is occupied by Egypt, the oven is occupied by Syria. Culinary specialists am
    Maybe turning to the kitchen language, it’s time to put Europe in the “refrigerator” (by turning off the gas in winter) ... winked
    1. Denis
      Denis 16 August 2013 16: 53 New
      0
      Quote: seasoned
      it’s time to put Europe in the “refrigerator” (turning off the gas in winter) ...

      It’s better that the grandmas pay us, but in a pinch, I think it’s not rusting for us ..
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. a52333
    a52333 16 August 2013 16: 43 New
    +3
    They will overturn this brew on themselves someday.
    1. experienced
      experienced 16 August 2013 16: 46 New
      +1
      Quote: a52333
      They will overturn this brew on themselves someday.

      While from the scum "the whole stove" burns and the fire flares up more and more. True "cooks" brew their own brew in someone else's house, nothing threatens their homes yet hi
      1. a52333
        a52333 16 August 2013 17: 07 New
        +1
        Iran has a tap from this "gas stove" at hand (Strait of Hormuz). I just want to cover it up right.
    2. alone
      alone 16 August 2013 16: 48 New
      +1
      wait and see
  3. Arabist
    Arabist 16 August 2013 17: 42 New
    +1
    I do not think that Iran will abandon its nuclear program. In Iran, the main thing is not the president, but the spiritual leader. Ali Hosseini Khamenei said that Iran will continue to work despite all IAEA protests. After all, a nuclear baton is a guarantee of independence.
  4. Vtel
    Vtel 16 August 2013 20: 21 New
    0
    - The United States and the West put Iran, figuratively speaking, on a “small fire”.


    This is how to look, rather the opposite. Time will tell.
  5. individual
    individual 17 August 2013 07: 29 New
    +1
    Iran is another hot spot in the Middle East.
    Therefore, even in the conditions of the blockade by the West and internal economic difficulties, Iran is forced to finance Syria, realizing that Iran will be the next objectionable to Islamic terrorists and the West.
    The more militants grind in Syria, the less threat to Iran’s statehood.
  6. gregor6549
    gregor6549 17 August 2013 11: 46 New
    0
    Who thought that Hassan Rouhani held moderate views? Rhetoric may be more moderate, unlike Akhimejan, since Akhmedijan began to annoy even his puppeteers, but Rukhani’s views are the same, if not tougher. The mere appointment of the chief creator of Hezbollah as Minister of Defense says a lot.
    Those. Rukhani is one of those politicians who lay softly and with whom it is hard to sleep. And this is even more dangerous than the belligerent statements of Ahmidejan, which forced the entire civilized world to be wary of monitoring Iran’s "vigorous" program and taking at least some measures to restrain this program. And Rukhani lulls everyone with his sweet and "peace-loving" speeches, not canceling and even more accelerating Iran’s preparations for a great war in the Middle East and not only him. The Russian Ministry of Defense, by the way, clearly understands this, strengthening its military potential in the region bordering Iran, but at the same time, some people in Russia are trying not to miss the chance to cut down "unnecessary" grandmas by selling to Iran something that could soon be turned against Russia itself. The only problem is that some Russians cut the headstock, but other Russians will shoot from the sold weapons. Everything has happened more than once. and not only with Russia, but who is learning from their lessons. Everyone wants to teach a lesson to someone else, but they get a ruler, usually on their nose.
  7. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 18 August 2013 21: 28 New
    +2
    the president in Iran is the same as the president in the US: they themselves do not decide anything. In Iran, Ayatollah Khomenei always has the last word. In the USA - the last word is always for the Fed owners. And the presidents are allowed to chat in public, they say, democrat-a-ah, you know ...