LewRockwell.com: US is sure - Russia and China will not have time to answer

137
“We are dealing with the neoconservative American military, who have gone out of control and endanger the Americans and the whole world,” writes Paul Craig Roberts, former economic policy aide to the US Treasury Secretary in the administration of Ronald Reagan. So he commented on the publication in the American media about the preparation of a plan of war against China and a preemptive strike on Russia.

LewRockwell.com: US is sure - Russia and China will not have time to answer


China is undoubtedly aware of Washington’s preparations for war. And China most likely realizes that the US government plans to launch a preemptive nuclear strike. “According to Washington, no other method of warfare makes sense. The “superpower” was never able to capture Baghdad, and in Afghanistan after the 11 years of war, it was defeated by a couple of thousands of lightly armed Taliban militants. Engage in the war with China using the usual weapons for Washington, it will mean the end of everything, ”the author writes.

Back in the days when China was a backward third world country, they were able to stop US forces in Korea. Today, China is the second economy in the world, and it is rapidly catching up with a weakening US economy.

In fact, the Pentagon’s plan is a pretext for multibillion-dollar injections into the military and security sectors, of which most will be wasted. At the same time, it is clear that China alone cannot win. But this “saber-rattling” can lead to war. “And if Washington turns out to be so stupid as to unleash a war, then the only way to defeat it is to use nuclear weapons. Of course, radiation will kill Americans at the same time, ”writes Roberts.

During the Cold War, nuclear weapons were a means of protection. The point was that both the USA and the USSR had sufficient arsenal to ensure mutual guaranteed destruction. Nuclear weapons did not give anyone an advantage in the attack.

The collapse of the USSR and China’s focus on economic development gave Washington a nuclear advantage. According to experts, the author of the article notes, this advantage gives America the possibility of delivering a preemptive nuclear strike. They said that neither China nor Russia would be able to strike back.

Publications in the media made it clear to Russia and China that the United States plans to launch a preemptive strike on both countries. In addition, in order to completely eliminate the possibility of a retaliatory strike from Russia, the US is trying to deploy missile defense systems near the Russian borders, bypassing agreements between the US and the USSR, Roberts notes.

"Due to the fact that the American press is a corrupt tool of government propaganda, the American people have no idea that neoconservative Washington is planning a nuclear war," the author writes. They are also not aware of the recent statement by former President Jimmy Carter that the United States no longer has a working democracy.

The possibility of starting a nuclear war was laid 11 years ago, when US President George W. Bush signed the Review of the State of Nuclear Weapons. This document launched the new arms race. Russian President Vladimir Putin immediately declared that the country is ready to allocate any necessary amount to maintain the ability to strike back.

China also demonstrated what it can do by shooting down its satellite with a ballistic missile. The mayor of Hiroshima said that the nuclear non-proliferation treaty is under threat because Washington announced the possibility of a warning strike. He stated that “the United States seems to be worshiping nuclear weapons like a god.”

Surveys conducted around the world show that Israel and the United States are considered the most important threats to peace and life on Earth. “Yes, the governments of these two countries do not comply with the laws, and they proudly call themselves“ the greatest democracies of the world, ”the author writes and adds that they do not observe either international laws, nor human rights, nor Geneva conventions, nor even their own laws.

No other country has imperialistic ambitions. China has not captured Taiwan, although it can do so at any time. Russia did not capture the former Soviet republics, such as Georgia, which, provoked by Washington, began hostilities, and its armed forces were immediately suppressed by the Russian army. “Putin could have hung up a Georgian puppet of Washington and brought Georgia back to Russia,” the author writes.

Over the past 68 years, most armed conflicts have been somehow provoked by Israel and the United States. However, they make sacrifices of themselves. But Israel has an illegal nuclear arsenal. It was Washington that developed the plan for a preemptive nuclear strike. “The rest of the world rightly regards the irresponsible governments of these two countries as a direct threat to life on earth,” the author concludes.
137 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +35
    1 August 2013 07: 59
    An objective article, Bush is the youngest bright representative of today's American elite - with low intelligence but arrogant and completely confident in his impunity and infallibility.
    God forbid, all this will end with a big schucher ........
    1. +6
      1 August 2013 11: 18
      They said that neither China nor Russia will be able to strike back.

      I think it’s not worth checking))))
      1. orkibotu
        +4
        1 August 2013 11: 58
        apparently they forgot about "Boreas" and "Bulava"
        1. -11
          1 August 2013 14: 24
          Is Chernobyl not enough for you?
          1. +7
            1 August 2013 14: 41
            Quote: Vasya
            Is Chernobyl not enough for you?


            Rather, Fukushima. After all, the USA does not have a continental missile defense system. And even if it was - the sense of it at the finish of the trajectory ...
            1. +1
              1 August 2013 17: 36
              Quote: Botanologist
              After all, the United States does not have a continental missile defense system

              Yes, it’s not even about the global radionuclide pollution, although there are neutron weapons
            2. +3
              1 August 2013 20: 03
              Quote: Botanologist
              After all, the United States does not have a continental missile defense system. And even if it was - the sense of it at the finish of the trajectory ...

              AMERS has a continental missile defense system ... We have it around Moscow as a control center, and they have it around the starting positions of ICBMs.
              A range of 2 km at altitudes of up to 000-500 km is far from the end of an ICBM flight. But they are insured by the deployment of their new missile defense sites in Europe (Poland, Romania ...).
              There is one universal law determining the preparation for war - this is the withdrawal of finance from the economy of the future target of the attack. So far, America is investing more than it is withdrawing ... so let's hope for the best ...
              THEY REALLY WANT TO LIVE ALSO !!! And they know that we will have time to strike back ... even if at the time our ICBMs arrive at their destination, most of Russia will not. BUT THERE WILL NOT BE AND ... AND LIKE EVERYONE WOULD LIKE THIS !!!
              1. +3
                1 August 2013 21: 17
                Quote: KazaK Bo
                While amers invest more than they withdraw ...

                Tell me, how much money did they invest in our economy?
                Considering that they print them freely, we work for them for free
              2. +10
                2 August 2013 01: 00
                Quote: KazaK Bo
                There is one universal law determining the preparation for war - this is the withdrawal of finance from the economy of the future target of the attack.

                There is one universal law conditionality of war for economic reasons. And they are presently present: the USA is a bankrupt state, the state debt of which exceeds the country's annual GDP by 1,5 times.
                The states have tested the method of avoiding debt payments by starting world wars. Twice they have already done so, why not try a third time?
                Who does it depend on? - From the super magnates of the Bilderberg group.
                They believe that the Earth is overpopulated. Human life is worthy of the “golden billion” of Western civilization, and the remaining 3-4 billion will serve them. Russia plans to leave 15-20 million people for mining. War is a way to radically reduce the population of the Earth.
                When can this happen? - When they will be confident in the impunity of their adventure.
                It is necessary to achieve overwhelming superiority over the enemy. To do this, through mn public opinion, it is necessary to force the Russian Federation to abandon tactical nuclear weapons as weapons of the battlefield. Freeze the development of strategic nuclear forces. Create an 100% missile defense system that guarantees a retaliatory strike against the aggressor.
                What do you need? - Weapons, which the enemy has no equal, and the political will of the ruling elite.
                It will be a high-precision hypersonic weapon. Nuclear weapons based on short-lived elements with mini-capacities, of the order of 0,1-1 ct. This is a laser weapon in space and on the battlefield. Electromagnetic guns and drones are battle drones. Etc.
                Now the question is: What are the staff members missing, or what are they not working on now? Who is going to attack them? Against whom is all this? Against Guatemala?
                The conclusion of the article is correct. But time is lost. Z. Brzezinski openly announced this to the President when he reproached him for being the old anti-Soviet and Russophobe Zbigniew, who advocated the destruction of Russia as an enemy of the United States by military means, warned him against an adventure. - "It could have been done in the 90s, now it is not." So the will of the "owners" of amers is needed to arms. And this is strongly influenced by the power of the opposing alliance between the Russian Federation and the PRC. Suicides have not yet been observed among them. Apparently, they will intrigue with the aim of undermining the military-economic potential, the collapse of the coalition, provoking conflicts and "revolutions" of white-ribbon workers and nationalists, etc.
              3. elmonje
                +1
                2 August 2013 03: 51
                There is one universal law determining the preparation for war - this is the withdrawal of finance from the economy of the future target of the attack

                Maybe you have links / documentation / statistics on this topic? Several times already met mention of this law, but he himself could not get the information to dig up adequate. The situation in the oil and gas sector is just interesting (I mean prices for raw materials) - is it possible to consider raising prices as one of the ways to pump money into our economy?
            3. -5
              1 August 2013 22: 54
              Botanologist

              North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is a joint aerospace defense system of the United States and Canada, the main tasks of which are to ensure control of the air and near-earth space of North America, early warning of an aerospace attack, anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense of the two countries. " (VKP).
              1. +2
                2 August 2013 04: 55
                it is so smooth on paper, but in fact zilch.
                1. 0
                  2 August 2013 15: 49
                  dmitrich

                  Are you sure?

                  Are you a great specialist in missile defense and air defense?

                  Then enlighten us - what, in your opinion, "zilch"?
                  1. 0
                    4 August 2013 02: 52
                    if the Yankees were sure of an unpunished nuclear strike, they would have done it a long time ago no doubt, but they know that their missile defense is zilch, a fairy tale like Reagan's SDI.
      2. +7
        1 August 2013 14: 23
        Nobody will even check this. SASHA has nothing and, most importantly, no one to fight. They are economically tied to China and Russia. It’s easier for them to buy leadership, opposition, enterprises for candy wrappers. And already fighting drugs, swine and other flu, the media. They turn Russians into listless Europeans and Americans.
        Russia, more an Asian country, despite centuries-old attempts to make us homosexuals and consumers (similar to Europeans), this has not yet succeeded in all regions.
        Give the goal and IDEALOGY to the country, change the Constitution, which is constantly violated by liberals.
        Article 7, Article 9, paragraph 1,
        Article 13
        1. The Russian Federation recognizes ideological diversity.
        2. No ideology can be established as a state or mandatory.
        3. The Russian Federation recognizes political diversity, multi-party system.
        4. Public associations are equal before the law.
        5. It is forbidden to create and operate public associations whose goals or actions are aimed at forcibly changing the foundations of the constitutional system and violating the integrity of the Russian Federation, undermining the security of the state, creating armed groups, inciting social, racial, national and religious hatred. (But what about some NGOs?)

        Article 14
        1. The Russian Federation is a secular state. No religion can be established as state or mandatory. (And Orthodoxy, robbing museums and taking hospitals and schools?)
        2. Religious associations are separated from the state and are equal before the law. (Pay and settle)

        Article 15
        1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force, direct effect and applies throughout the territory of the Russian Federation.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Andrey312
          +1
          2 August 2013 09: 50
          Why does the US need a world nuclear war? Here, after all, you can get it for soup ... Or do they live poorly? Or do they lack resources? National debt? So what? Well, there he is ... nothing to worry about ... There will be little money - they will also print and buy whatever they want. The economy, though slowly, is growing. So they will maintain global instability, fighting a obviously weak enemy with the help of a UAV to cut the military budget ....
    2. +3
      1 August 2013 12: 19
      We need to collect them all
      into one big herd!
      And a nuclear bomb -
      wipe out! am
      1. 0
        2 August 2013 04: 57
        but why collect them, they already live in heaps.
    3. +5
      1 August 2013 12: 21
      Quote: ziqzaq
      God forbid, all this will end with a big schucher ..

      I am afraid that it will not be otherwise. Until the beast is destroyed in its hole, there will be no peace on earth.
      1. Natalia
        +3
        1 August 2013 14: 26
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        I am afraid that it will not be otherwise. Until the beast is destroyed in its hole, there will be no peace on earth.

        Hi Sasha!) Well, these balwans (USA) do not live in peace on earth, they strive to destroy someone. Interestingly, they roughly imagine how much radiation they will later haw. They probably prefer to die slowly and to suffer.
        Indeed, one disaster at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant did not deliver weakly to the whole world, but how much nuclear weapons should be used to destroy Russia and China ...
        ... after this, they will no longer need shale oil, and all the MacDonald’s will close ... they’ll have to live in the subway as in that game (Metro) and go to the surface with a gas mask.
      2. 0
        2 August 2013 13: 32
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        God forbid, all this will end with a big schucher ..

        The gun hangs on the wall for a long time, but someday it will fire, sadly!
    4. +5
      1 August 2013 12: 49
      Quote: ziqzaq
      Bush is the youngest bright representative of today's American elite - with low intelligence but arrogant and completely confident in his impunity and infallibility

      The number of idiots in society directly depends on the ideology of the current
      authorities. And the less power is engaged in ideology, the more it
      forced to engage in idiots.
      1. Natalia
        +2
        1 August 2013 14: 48
        That's very right here they started talking about the Perimeter.
        The Perimeter system launches an automatic massive nuclear strike. It guarantees the launch of underwater, airborne and silo-based ballistic missiles in the event that the enemy destroys ALL the points capable of giving an order for a retaliatory attack. It is completely independent of the remaining communications and command systems, even from the notorious “nuclear suitcase” of the Kazbek system.
        the Perimeter system, which received the chilling name of the Dead Hand in the Western press, the last argument of the Soviet (and now Russian) state. Despite the large number and variety of “Doomsday Machines” invented by science fiction writers, guaranteeing retaliation to any enemy and capable of getting and guaranteed to destroy him, only the “Perimeter” apparently exists.


        So the Americans have no chance to survive in the event of an adventure.
    5. +1
      1 August 2013 22: 41
      As long as the USSR existed, so many USA made plans for its destruction. It will also be the same with China and Russia. Under no circumstances will the United States launch a full-scale war with China and Russia, because they understand that this is suicide. If not from retaliation, then from a nuclear winter, and maybe from volcanic activity, which can begin due to the use of a large number of nuclear stocks.
    6. 0
      1 August 2013 23: 27
      I would clarify a little - as objective as an article written by an American can be objective.

      Back in the days when China was a backward third world country, they were able to stop US forces in Korea

      Well, let's say in Korea, the USA was stopped not by China, but by the USSR and China, and China made a much smaller contribution to this.
  2. +23
    1 August 2013 08: 12
    nobody canceled a dead hand. America will not endure anything good from the next war. Technologies after 2wows went far ahead, the whole world was in ruins for an hour. Striped as if forgot about it. And as a preventive strike, it is necessary to dash the Iskander on the Bilderberg assembly. The world will be cleaner for generations
    1. +6
      1 August 2013 10: 00
      Quote: vadson
      Striped as if forgot about it

      more surprising is the confidence of the Yusovites that Russia will not be able to answer wassat . very bad steel (or really imagined themselves superhuman) fool God forbid, the "big fuss" begins, no missile defense system will help the Stars and Stripes to avoid retaliation.
      «“Superpower” was never able to capture Baghdad, and in Afghanistan after 11 years of war it was defeated by a couple of thousand lightly armed Taliban militants. Engaging in a war with China using conventional weapons for Washington will mean the end of everything
      - here you have the most warring power. only they can offend someone weaker (and even that is not always effective). were jackals, jackals, and will end their days!
      1. +1
        1 August 2013 12: 24
        Quote: self-propelled

        more surprising is the Yusovites' confidence that Russia will not be able to respond

        Hitler was also sure, one powerful blow and that’s all. Also, by the way, he put technological Russia on backwardness and delivered
        1. 0
          1 August 2013 14: 54
          NATO base in Ulyanovsk, flights of THEM aircraft on our territory, joint exercises on our territory, smoldering Caucasus, Gaster and representatives of foreign firms in Moscow, etc. And how many percent are you sure that enterprises created with foreign money are guarded by people who are loyal to the Russian Federation, and are not the 5th column?
          Are you still sure that a surprise attack will not work? Given the venality of former criminals (deputies of all levels) and policemen (not in vain renamed) ...........
          Acting in the role of offended (not legally subjected to aggression) will not work. Offended cockerels in full. And there are a lot of people who want to avenge the "occupation".
          And in the armed forces nothing and nobody was left (window dressing does not count). Several units, parts, problems will not be solved.
          Again the militia? So NVP, as an object, is absent. Even our forests will not save (lack of camouflage skills from detection tools).
          In my opinion, it's time to do what SASHA does. Terrorism and the destruction of those who are not acceptable and traitors.
          He betrayed the state, robbed him, work against him - send a wreath in advance and let them be afraid
          1. -4
            1 August 2013 20: 02
            NATO base in Ulyanovsk, flights of THEM aircraft on our territory, joint exercises on our territory, smoldering Caucasus, Gaster and representatives of foreign firms in Moscow, etc. And how many percent are you sure that enterprises created with foreign money are guarded by people who are loyal to the Russian Federation, and are not the 5th column?
            Are you still sure that a surprise attack will not work? Given the venality of former criminals (deputies of all levels) and policemen (not in vain renamed) ...........

            Worth considering!
            1. 0
              2 August 2013 09: 44
              "It is worth considering!"
              Do not break the thought)))))))))))))
          2. +1
            2 August 2013 04: 58
            Don’t be sad, we’ll find you a woman.
    2. fedorovith
      +3
      1 August 2013 12: 22
      In this club there are some decrepit senility who have been looking in boxes for a long time, but what about the rest with heads?
    3. +1
      1 August 2013 12: 23
      Quote: vadson
      Technology after 2wows went far ahead, the whole world in ruins for an hour

      Well, in an hour, we won’t waste the whole world, it will take three days, so that everything is in ruin.
      Damn, then there will be no Internet, all servers in the USA laughing
      1. +11
        1 August 2013 12: 43
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Damn, then there will be no Internet, all servers in the USA

        Nothing, but the birth rate will increase wink
      2. +4
        1 August 2013 12: 44
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Damn, then there will be no Internet, all servers in the USA

        Sasha, hello !! For the sake of a good deed, you can also consume an Internet, but the world will become a hundred times easier ..
        1. -8
          1 August 2013 15: 02
          You already have pigs poisoned, then they will take over people. Medvedev wanted to replace pigs with sheep in all private farms, but do you only care about the Internet?
          Well, yes: again, as in the case of the tsar, the peasants themselves will figure it out, but we will remove the tax for the use of Cossack lands
    4. -1
      1 August 2013 14: 29
      AND WHO WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF HUMANITY?
      1. +4
        1 August 2013 14: 33
        I am ready to answer for the destruction of "American Humanity" in the Basmanny Court of Moscow, since I am a citizen of the Russian Federation, and I will be responsible at the place of registration.
        1. -2
          1 August 2013 23: 00
          tilovaykrisa

          How bloodthirsty you are! ...
          1. +1
            1 August 2013 23: 06
            The death of American humanity for the Life of the rest of Humanity, and after such sacrifice on my part do you call me bloodthirsty ?? Yes, I'm just darling.
        2. 0
          5 August 2013 15: 55
          Americans do not belong to humanity, as well as some representatives of the so-called. "Russian" ethnos. But, as I understand it, EVERYONE agrees to strike nuclear weapons against the USA? Not many of those who expressed their opinion on the site will be able to survive after a retaliatory strike. Which one of you are kamikaze? Who will be able to survive in the fields, the surviving forests? At the same time, it is necessary to save the survivors, kill the marauders, inflict maximum damage on the invaders.
          Fumble do not toss bags.
          Nuclear weapons - the last chance.
      2. -1
        2 August 2013 05: 00
        everything shows that you are with Barack and McCain, no one else
        1. 0
          2 August 2013 15: 47
          dmitrich

          You're wrong!

          But mountains of corpses do not inspire me! Let it be the corpses of enemies! As well as their elderly, women and children.
          1. 0
            2 August 2013 16: 04
            dmitrich

            There is a huge difference between a soldier and a killer! Do not find?
            1. 0
              4 August 2013 02: 56
              I agree, an example of Syria.
  3. +9
    1 August 2013 08: 17
    Write, write gentlemen Americans, but pay more attention of your citizens to the fact that in the event of the use of nuclear weapons against Russia, America and its brainless satellites will be destroyed, and that it is better to consider their nuclear weapons as a deterrent weapon as before, if there is not enough intelligence to understand that no one on our planet, neither the United States nor their friends are needed, that people have something to do besides hatching plans to attack the United States for no reason at all. Although, "a humpbacked grave will fix it, but stupidity is for a long time (read forever)."
    1. +4
      1 August 2013 19: 49
      Quote: Jura
      write to the Americans, but pay more attention to your citizens that in the case of the use of nuclear weapons against Russia, America and its brainless satellites will be destroyed

      AMers understand ... they know ... they have long calculated on their super computers that in the event of a preemptive strike, the United States will still receive unacceptable damage to all areas of its existence and as a state they will cease to exist.
      Their intelligence ... space ... electronic intelligence is at a high level and they reliably know that in spite of the general, sometimes, collapse and fermentation in Russia, the level of SPRN, PKO and missile defense is always at the proper level and can open in any case launches of ICBMs, KR ... and Strategic Missile Forces - to manage to launch our ICBMs for an adequate response.
      1. +1
        1 August 2013 20: 36
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        AMers understand ... they know ... they have long calculated on their super computers that in the event of a preemptive strike, the United States will still receive unacceptable damage to all areas of its existence and as a state they will cease to exist.

        Yes, this is true when it comes to the ruling class. Do their people know this, and if he knew what he would say? Although I have a feeling that the American people are already irrevocably transformed into an everlasting one, which will have a drum that will happen to them and other people on the planet, if only there is always a hawk at the stall, and besides, most of them for some reason believe that they anyone will go to heaven.
        1. Misantrop
          +2
          2 August 2013 10: 01
          Quote: Jura
          if only at the stall in the trough there was always a hawk,

          Despite the fact that almost all production of consumer goods was moved to China, what are they going to eat and wear? And do they remember how many Chinese are in the US right now? In any situation, the Russian Federation will be able to respond to the blow, and the Chinese emigrants will finish off the survivors in the United States. They were late with missile defense ... request lol
          1. +1
            2 August 2013 12: 03
            Quote: Misantrop
            and the Chinese emigrants will finish off the survivors in the USA. They were late with missile defense ...

            I agree with every word of your comment.
  4. +3
    1 August 2013 08: 19
    No well that's am they consider themselves the most fearless campaign in this life, one gets the feeling that in front of them are children with toy weapons angry
    1. +1
      1 August 2013 08: 26
      Quote: starmos
      Not well, it’s am they consider themselves the most fearless campaign in this life, one gets the feeling that in front of them are children with toy weapons

      The militants have seen enough with Chuck Norris, and they think that they are, forgetting that they themselves are just spectators.
    2. -8
      1 August 2013 15: 14
      Are you children at all?
      When you fuck - you grow up and feel like living on the pasture in a hostile environment (called Americanism)
      Who and how protects Our "retaliatory strike"? You know?
      Want to give out military secrets: how to neutralize the Strategic Missile Forces?
      Read the chronicle of 1941. Everything is described there.
      Only the number of traitors will be greater.
      On the country and fellow citizens do not care. Save yourself. Egoism is the official ideology of the state and its citizens.
      Siberia lasts the longest. But there were no troops left.
      1. +3
        1 August 2013 21: 05
        Quote: Vasya
        When you fuck - you grow up and feel like living on the pasture in a hostile environment (called Americanism)

        Vasya (Vasya), I understand your position, but you also understand that the relations of our country with the USA and the West are almost fatal at present, and the outcome of these relations is almost one hundred percent not dependent on Russia but on them, well, they don’t want to understand what we don’t want to be their appendage raw, territorial, cheap slave by force, the dump of their surrogates. Centuries have passed and they hope to break us off. And in some of the most difficult crises, I fully admit that they can go on a life-threatening gamble, and here I am not going to cry and whine if this happens it will happen for them, too, without options. Above Vasya’s head, we hold the tail with a gun, we work and build our life further, we hope that their militaristic-p.i.d.r.p.a.s.actic fumes will subside and they will be able to really think.
        1. 0
          5 August 2013 15: 43
          I'm a pessimist by nature. Yes, and read a lot of alt. Literature (he served). Everywhere in the literature there are questions: Who, how and how will avenge the death of Our people. There is no hope of leading the country (in most cases). There is an option to return to the Stalinist policy. GDP will return the death penalty, nationalization of large-scale industrial enterprises, etc. Don't give a damn about Western values. Russia is the recipient of Russia - collectivism, community. Democratic values ​​appeared in our country earlier than in the "tribal" west.
      2. Misantrop
        +1
        2 August 2013 10: 06
        Quote: Vasya
        Read the chronicle of 1941. Everything is described there.
        Only the number of traitors will be greater.

        But only in 1941 there were NO SUCH means for the soldiers of the Red Army, as they are now in service ... wink
        1. 0
          5 August 2013 15: 33
          There is application literacy. You may be able to work. And the fooled youth? Will some veterans and pensioners fight? I swore allegiance to the USSR. It's my duty. And the rest? I would like to have a shoulder nearby and a rear.
  5. +15
    1 August 2013 08: 26
    No other country has imperialistic ambitions. China has not captured Taiwan, although it can do so at any time. Russia did not capture the former Soviet republics, such as Georgia, which, provoked by Washington, began hostilities, and its armed forces were immediately suppressed by the Russian army. “Putin could have hung up a Georgian puppet of Washington and brought Georgia back to Russia,” the author writes.

    The whole essence of the article in these lines! Yes, we could destroy the Baltic republics, bang Georgia! But we are peaceful people, we don’t need a stranger, but we will protect our own to the last. (An exception is the list of Forbes with non-Russian surnames, these themselves, if possible)
    1. +5
      1 August 2013 13: 21
      "We don't need someone else's ... But we will take ours, no matter whoever it is!" wink
      1. -6
        1 August 2013 15: 22
        Where is your own?
        To be honest, then Schleswig and Holstein, Hokaydo, Manchuria, Malta, Germany to the Oder, Finland, Stogolm, Paris, Korea, Cote d'Azur, Iran, Palestine, Israel, etc. Hawaii
        There is a contract.
        But they forgot about some.
        1. 0
          5 August 2013 16: 01
          Someone denies that the named territories are ours?
          Where the Russian flag was hoisted, the boot of a Russian soldier stepped, Russia cannot leave from there. Paid that territory and the blood and sweat of Russian people.
  6. +1
    1 August 2013 08: 32
    He commented on publications in the American media about the preparation of a plan of war against China and a preemptive strike against Russia.
    This is clear evidence that former greatness by amers has already been lost. They cannot imagine life in a different world order. And the usual funds are not enough. So they rush in anger from one extreme to another. And the world’s device is slowly but surely changing. And not in the direction of strengthening America. And they will not attack. Not quite the same with their brains ...
  7. 0
    1 August 2013 08: 33
    The article reflects reality well, but they forgot about the satellite of the weak-willed and thoughtless.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +5
    1 August 2013 08: 41
    The article is interesting. But it seems to me that Amer is bluffing ... Here, they will pit someone they are experts!
    1. +3
      1 August 2013 12: 42
      Quote: MIKHAN
      But it seems to me that Amer is bluffing .. Here's to pit someone they are masters!

      They do not bluff Vitali, they do not bluff after they have acquired nuclear weapons from year to year, over and over again they work out the scenarios of bombing Russia, and the only thing that keeps them from implementing their plans is that Russia has time to prepare for an adequate retaliatory strike.
  10. Gur
    +10
    1 August 2013 09: 12
    Yeah! The world is on the brink of disaster (my opinion) as a symptom of sheer insanity in everything, from religion to human morality. Gays and lesbians are becoming the norm, the Pope is the defender of the faith and he sees nothing wrong with this, pedophilia and incest are enshrined in law. Thugs and assassins are the defenders of democracy. Nuclear weapons as a deterrent can now be freely used as an offensive factor. This planet dies or will die as a result of such insanity. Indeed, the whole world is in dust, is the half of the world of the blind? does "dedicated Europe" not see and understand where the world is heading, is it possible that there are no healthy people in the United States?
    1. +4
      1 August 2013 09: 27
      Quote: GUR
      Yeah! The world is on the brink of disaster (my opinion) as a symptom of sheer insanity in everything, from religion to human morality. Gays and lesbians are becoming the norm, the Pope is the defender of the faith and he sees nothing wrong with this, pedophilia and incest are enshrined in law. Thugs and assassins are the defenders of democracy. Nuclear weapons as a deterrent can now be freely used as an offensive factor. This planet dies or will die as a result of such insanity. Indeed, the whole world is in dust, is the half of the world of the blind? does "dedicated Europe" not see and understand where the world is heading, is it possible that there are no healthy people in the United States?

      I completely agree with you, Europe, and with it the United States, have forgotten the lessons of their own history, everyone remembers Rome - great and powerful, "a ray of light in the dark kingdom", a stronghold of enlightenment and civilization, as historians like to say about it. Perhaps this was so at the beginning of its heyday, but when the elite, and after it the whole society, started playing debauchery, incest, homosexuality and other things, then decline soon came. Doesn't it remind anyone of anything ???
    2. +3
      1 August 2013 10: 51
      They also have intelligent people, and it is thanks to them that this scenario did not begin to be realized. But another thing is alarming - never before after the collapse of the USSR did you come across references to similar messages from the USA about preventive strikes, this is already something new. And warlike rhetoric from the United States sounds louder, and more and more people who begin to use it. On the one hand, this is a sign of weakness, but on the other, complete insanity. It seems that for many in the United States, the trend in the development of the situation in the world came as a shock, and they simply were not ready for them ...
  11. +2
    1 August 2013 09: 18
    Mattresses are primarily the heirs of the British Empire, and they are used to fighting not with their own, but primarily with the wrong hands. They crawl into the fray last, and then they scream the loudest than anyone and they will attract more than anyone. Plans to strike at the USSR began to be built during WWII, but now 60 with more than one year remains only on paper. Every country has plans for a war with a likely adversary, and this is normal, generals always prepare for future wars, but at the same time dream that the war would not happen ...
  12. xmike
    -4
    1 August 2013 09: 26
    Superficially and not justified, the article did not like .....
  13. _Igor_
    +5
    1 August 2013 09: 32
    “The rest of the world rightly considers the irresponsible governments of these two countries as an immediate threat to life on earth,” the author concludes.

    +100500

    they think they’ll sit in their same-sex bunkers
  14. +3
    1 August 2013 10: 06
    Yesterday, in the "Geopolitical Mosaic", I read about how an American journalist teaches Obama how to shit on us. How to put pressure on us. Is this article not a continuation of the words of the journalist? Inveterate warriors, there are enough everywhere. Well, those who always offer - "ZHAHNUT". Only now they lost sight of the financial elite. But without their knowledge, in the same States, no one can fart. Bunkers are good, but now I strongly doubt that the elite wants to live in these bunkers. Even if such a scenario happens (mind you). two gigantic territories, will be able to radiate all over the world (air and sea currents, precipitation). Global climate change. But what about the villas on the "paradise" islands? What about a luxurious life? And most importantly, these two territories will immediately be joined by a third - the United States itself. All these tales from the fact that we may not be in time - we will have time, even as we have time. In short, another attempt to catch up on us with horror. The elites have something to lose, and they are clearly not suicidal. Although ...., maybe they have already built bases on Mars :-)
  15. +2
    1 August 2013 10: 21
    Plans for an attack on the USSR with the use of nuclear weapons of the United States have been planned since the late 40s, at least updating them every 5 years, there is nothing new, but at the moment the American elite is not the same as before and over the past 20 years this new generation of American politicians is used to that the us are doing what they want and nothing else, they do not know and do not understand what a world war is, all their examples are wars such as Iraq, they really have no fear of nuclear weapons, and for the most part the people are stupid foolish to inspire something they just don’t spit and have no idea what will happen to their country, they don’t even think that they could be damaged in their territory, because they never fought on their land, except for civil wars.
  16. +3
    1 August 2013 10: 27
    US policy is a new generation of fascism .... not for nothing that all the Nazis hid from them.
  17. +3
    1 August 2013 10: 34
    It’s time for Putin to gather some UN Security Council or some other organization there and bring up the issue of transferring all US nuclear weapons under international control, the reason is the loss of adequacy by the US leadership and the lack of competent support staff.
  18. +2
    1 August 2013 10: 46
    Time to reply. The ruins of Washington are satisfied!
    1. -1
      1 August 2013 12: 46
      Or quotation marks ...
      or, whatever .. "or remove the cross or put on panties .."
      Or - direct speech?
      And then where is the regiment with a singing squadron?
      ...
      I liked it.
      I would have sung it myself. Together.
    2. +1
      1 August 2013 20: 14
      Quote: shark
      Time to reply. The ruins of Washington are satisfied!

      .. a sob soldier
      A tear rolled ...
      Played a trophy saxophone,
      And on the chest a medal hung
      Out of town WASHINGTON ....
  19. Gur
    +4
    1 August 2013 10: 52
    Now I think whether to make repairs in the apartment, or to lower the money to a thread for fun?)) UN? this organization must be dispersed, it has outlived itself, since it (the organization) has no principles left, and the will to adhere to that charter, under the carpet game of the USA and Europe at the UN, is worse than open aggression.
  20. Kostya pedestrian
    +1
    1 August 2013 11: 17
    not that mascot in the USA - some kind of Celtic-British faded clover and three petals besides. The United States would have won for a long time if it had looked right in the eye: Why would one of the richest countries in the world with an established model of self-government within the country play a biblical character. In addition, I won’t be surprised if I find out that the role of the USA is assigned to some kind of queen who is overthrown in the Ocean.

    Precisely, the masses, the progenitors of German-Japanese imperialism, took power not only in the United States but also in the world. Even if he takes a closer look at the new tower in New York and the anti-mausoleums - exactly the Masonic symbol. One world means one misfortune at all or what? I personally do not agree with this. My people are a winner! We don’t even carry crosses, but on tanks we drive up to the Reichstag itself.
    1. Gur
      -1
      1 August 2013 13: 31
      Again some sort of insanity, dear express yourself more clearly ..
      1. 0
        1 August 2013 13: 39
        This is not insanity; this translator translates. laughing
  21. Arabist
    +2
    1 August 2013 12: 06
    The United States is seriously exaggerating its security and its capabilities. In fact, they want to destroy the two superpowers of the PRC and the Russian Federation, but they themselves can not dare to attack the unfortunate Syria, which is much weaker than us.
  22. +2
    1 August 2013 12: 18
    Hiroshima Mayor said the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is in jeopardy because Washington announced the possibility of a warning strike.
    And indignantly shook the tentacle.


    Interestingly, while planning a preemptive nuclear strike, these same neoconservatives from Washington did not forget about our Perimeter system?
  23. +4
    1 August 2013 12: 22
    I would say that we need to talk about the world triangle of evil: Israel, the USA and England.
  24. Taurus
    +4
    1 August 2013 12: 27
    Oh, nah. And if we have time? Russia and China. And, what then will be left of the torn to pieces geyropov and the former continent like America? Where will the nuclear clouds swirl Who are you scaring tiger hares here? The time for usaika and others to scare Russia has passed. We’re somehow afraid of it. First interesting, but then annoying. And we will break the mouth of America for any reason.
  25. 0
    1 August 2013 12: 36
    I support the idea that World War 3 will be due to America in an indirect or direct sense !!!
  26. Gadsnz
    0
    1 August 2013 12: 38
    USA dies like a wounded beast, realizing the approaching end of its influence in the world! Inappropriate plans cited in this article are direct proof of the irreversible process that has begun. We need to continue to engage in the development of our state and to defend our own political interests.
  27. Grigorich 1962
    0
    1 August 2013 12: 44
    The USA is an empire of evil and violence, hypocrisy and demagogy !!!!
  28. +1
    1 August 2013 13: 46
    The dog breaks, and the caravan moves on.
    "We must live, we only need to live correctly ..." V.M. Shukshin.
  29. +1
    1 August 2013 13: 49
    Everything is much worse than in the article.

    Question amateur. How is a nuclear warhead different from a conventional projectile?
    1. poccinin
      +3
      1 August 2013 14: 00
      A NORMAL APPLIANCE IS SIMPLY A - BOOM! - A NUCLEAR WARHEAD IS A - MEGABUM TO SEE AND IMMEDIATELY THAT GOD COME FOR YOU.
      1. 0
        1 August 2013 14: 30
        Quote: poccinin
        A NORMAL APPLIANCE IS SIMPLY A - BOOM! - A NUCLEAR WARHEAD IS A - MEGABUM TO SEE AND IMMEDIATELY THAT GOD COME FOR YOU.

        Fine. Immediately clear. The main thing is intelligible. :-)

        The second question is amateur. How long can a conventional projectile and vigorous warhead be stored?
        1. 0
          1 August 2013 14: 35
          The megabum is stored up to 30 years, the microbum is a little longer, but there is also a megabum, there those services are needed more often.
          1. -4
            1 August 2013 14: 50
            We will not pull the cat for a causal place :-)

            An ordinary shell is inexpensive to manufacture and keeps its properties in principle forever. In any case, the old shells and mines explode.

            Nuclear ammunition is short-lived due to the laws of physics. The half-life has not been canceled. And it may happen that they do not explode.

            Russia has practically stopped producing "weapons-grade plutonium." The stocks accumulated by the labor of our fathers and grandfathers were sold ... to the States. Nobody knows the market value of what was sold, as there is no official radioactive market. According to experts, the cost went off scale in trillions of dollars. The Yeltsin-Chernomyrdin government sold, it seems, for 100 billion. And then, the money went in parts and whether it got there is unknown.

            Today, Russia hardly supports the combat readiness of nuclear weapons. There are no uranium reserves for the production of warheads. And by 2015, Russia's nuclear arsenal could turn into zero.

            The American missile defense is not able to intercept a massive attack on ICBMs. But those single missiles, which will still be able to take off, will be intercepted by missile defense. And then the conditions of surrender will dictate.

            Dixi
            1. Arabist
              +3
              1 August 2013 15: 14
              You from Baku certainly see our nuclear shield and sword better. The United States sold spent fuel with an enrichment rate of 2%, to make an atomic bomb enrichment should be 90%. How is your forecast for 2015 proved? Both uranium and plutonium can be shoved into warheads. The US missile defense rarely intercepts even one single missile 50 years ago. And take off so much more than single missiles
              1. -1
                1 August 2013 15: 26
                From the side is always more visible. :-)

                Google "uranium deal". We sold highly enriched uranium. I'm not proving anything. I just use Russian sources. Hearings on the "uranium deal" were held in the Russian State Duma. During the "uranium deal", until December 31, 2008, Russia sold to the USA - 352,3 tons (out of 500 tons agreed) highly enriched weapons-grade uranium in a low enriched form. Nuclear charges were processed into low enriched ones and sold. The deal (now looked) amounted to 11,9 billion dollars. According to experts, 1 ton of enriched uranium costs more than $ 10 billion.

                The date in 2015 was given by foreign experts.

                I do not mind that Russia's nuclear shield is preserved. But is there this shield?
                1. Arabist
                  0
                  1 August 2013 19: 49
                  There is a shield, otherwise they would have attacked a long time ago. Do not want to believe in it, this is your right to that is the pluralism of opinions. A foreign experts can fully believe only a person with a level of infantility close to fatal. Is Russian sources an echo of Moscow?
                  1. 0
                    1 August 2013 19: 55
                    I believe there is a shield. But for how long? Physics, she and in Africa, physics. Foreign experts sometimes need to be trusted. Not to newspaper men and other magazines. And, for example, to analysts. This is their finest hour. Wait for the disarmament of Russia.

                    The first time I read about a uranium deal was 10 years ago. I’ve not specifically looked for it now, but here is the first link:

                    http://www.na-front.narod.ru/operations/nuclear/sdelka.htm

                    Honestly, I do not know what is written there. Look if interested. I know that several unexplained deaths took place there. By the way, the deal was 500 tons of enriched uranium. On the Internet it is written that hundreds of nuclear warheads have been disarmed. Not a specialist can not say anything.
                    1. Arabist
                      +1
                      1 August 2013 20: 17
                      I read about this deal, and it was discussed twice on this site. Modern analysts are often in terms of competency just above journalists. Economists who write when Russia goes bankrupt confuse inflation and deflation, the military doesn’t even see what they are writing in the photographs, political scientists don’t know which secular state in the East which is not. Although they write about elementary things in school textbooks, it seems that few people read them, and even fewer people who remember understood what they read.
                    2. 0
                      1 August 2013 21: 24
                      the Russian Federation has at least 2000 nuclear weapons charges, all of them were produced in the USSR for at least 30 years, it is possible to extend this period by diagnosing and replacing some elements, namely the detonator, for another 30 years, so that uranium from TNW can be taken.
                  2. 0
                    1 August 2013 20: 05
                    I apologize for the repeated letter.

                    The fact is that I'm on the site for only 3-4 days. Now, delving into a search engine, I discovered that this topic was already discussed on the same site in 2010.

                    http://topwar.ru/2575-uranovaya-sdelka-xronologiya-prodazhi-rossijskogo-oruzhejn

                    ogo-urana-v-ssha-za-1995-2008.html
            2. +1
              1 August 2013 21: 10
              Quote: Bakht
              There are no uranium reserves for the production of warheads. And by 2015, Russia's nuclear arsenal could turn into zero.


              Stop eating from aluminum utensils.

              You want to argue with you on the liquor box that by 2015 the Nuclear Shield will not go anywhere.
              1. +1
                1 August 2013 21: 19
                A SHIELD is A SHIELD, but you sold all the uranium and that’s a fact, thanks to the hunchback with EBN, this information is not a secret, we completely disguised it to the state of fuel and sold it to the United States, but we also did not have production capacities, the question is what we will we equip new poplars, brd, maces, etc. ??? Yes, and there is one more point about which practically nothing is written, I, as a person connected with this, dare to assert that all nuclear weapons charges from the 80s are made exclusively from theoretical calculations without practical testing, which means that far from 100% that they will work in right time, the USSR did not test nuclear weapons out of love for art or a spectacular show, and therefore we can only rely on products made to the maratorium for nuclear weapons tests.
                1. +1
                  1 August 2013 21: 42
                  I agree, a lot of things were pumped up during that period, but missiles will definitely not be loaded with felt boots. Sometimes a theoretician is better to never become a practice.
                  In general, I am surprised by the fighting impulse of individual idiots-Americans, well, not at that time we live so that we can rattle with weapons.
                  1. 0
                    1 August 2013 22: 13
                    Quote: poquello
                    I agree, a lot of things were pumped up during that period, but missiles will definitely not be loaded with felt boots. Sometimes a theoretician is better to never become a practice.
                    In general, I am surprised by the fighting impulse of individual idiots-Americans, well, not at that time we live so that we can rattle with weapons.

                    Judging by the numerous disasters and failures of American missiles, the state of their carriers is far from ideal and not accurate.
                    1/3 of the USA ICBMs will not take off or explode at the start, 1/3 will fly in the wrong direction, and those that go to the target will be mostly shot down, Russia also has air defense and guidance satellites, we are not Iraq or Libya.
                    And for a retaliatory strike, Russia has enough stationary and mobile ICBMs. And if China also kicks in, then the next "flight to the moon" can be filmed throughout the YSA.
                    1. 0
                      1 August 2013 22: 19
                      They don’t care much, they don’t plan to attack us with the help of their ICBMs, they need them for status, just in case they are already dying to shit, because they have such an attitude, they don’t modernize them and they’re not building new ones (almost), they have different strategist, namely, a massive strike by high-precision missile launchers with TNW warheads, here they are developing them, constantly updating, both the missile launchers themselves and the carriers for them. As soon as they can throw us 2500-3000 pieces at a time, then it’s worth it to sound a real alarm.
            3. 0
              2 August 2013 05: 05
              dream out loud.
            4. 0
              2 August 2013 08: 45
              You also know that
              The Russian state corporation Rosatom controls 20 percent of all uranium reserves in the United States. This was announced today by the head of the corporation Sergey Kiriyenko to the State Duma deputies.

              According to him, Rosatom not only managed to restore work at the fields of the Soviet era, but also expanded the range of fields it controls. “We have restored all the / uranium / deposits in Russia. In addition, we were able to collect uranium deposits in Kazakhstan, Australia, and recently received a license for a deposit in Tanzania,” the head of the state corporation said.

              “I can report to you,” he addressed to the deputies, “today we control 20 percent of uranium in the United States of America.“ If we need this uranium, we can use it at any time, ”Kiriyenko noted, adding that very serious investments have been made in the Russian Federation and today Russia has come to the second place in the world in terms of natural uranium reserves. "
            5. 0
              2 August 2013 10: 59
              Quote: Bakht
              Today, Russia hardly supports the combat readiness of nuclear weapons. There are no uranium reserves for the production of warheads. And by 2015, Russia's nuclear arsenal could turn into zero.

              Can share a source of information? Or in a dream dreamed?
  30. poccinin
    0
    1 August 2013 14: 03
    YES AND NO ONE CANCELED THE "PERIMETER"!
  31. Tolik.Skiff.
    +1
    1 August 2013 14: 32
    America has long been needed and it is time to break up from within, with the help of the media controlled by us, into independent States ... They are already ready for this ... hi
  32. 0
    1 August 2013 14: 43
    The article is so-so ... How much can you try about nuclear weapons? Other types of impact on the enemy - climatic, biological,
    1. 0
      2 August 2013 10: 36
      Quote: hoot
      The article is so-so ... How much can you try about nuclear weapons? Other types of impact on the enemy - climatic, biological,

      It's fantastic. Sensations for the profane.
  33. +1
    1 August 2013 14: 53
    Maybe they will hit us, maybe we won’t be able to answer, maybe many, but not all, will die, and those who remain will take up arms and Anger that will be in their eyes it will be the most terrible weapon that will be impossible to stop and what difference does Europe or We will reach America everywhere, our grandfathers and great-grandfathers have beaten enemies hundreds of times and we will not be disgraced.
  34. +2
    1 August 2013 16: 52
    As soon as the pissies start their br, you can burn old maps and globes because the concept of North America will cease to exist and the Rockefellers are well aware that a show called the White House will be arrested and crucified on the steps of the Capitol. Just one warhead in Yellowstone and ... Goodbye aaamerika oooh ...
    1. +2
      1 August 2013 21: 27
      Quote: KrSk
      As soon as the pissies start their br, you can burn old maps and globes because the concept of North America will cease to exist and the Rockefellers are well aware that a show called the White House will be arrested and crucified on the steps of the Capitol. Just one warhead in Yellowstone and ... Goodbye aaamerika oooh ...


      + and a lot of everything tasty, they won’t survive, only part of them are optimistic hawks. For such it is necessary to wave a big club otherwise they do not believe.
  35. +1
    1 August 2013 16: 54
    keep in mind the unpredictable greed of countries such as Israel and the United States; and the future military bloc India-Russia-China is defensive and I think it will be impenetrable
  36. Bashkaus
    +2
    1 August 2013 18: 17
    I don’t know what the Americans are planning there, but I think that attacks on us are impossible.
    If it were possible, in principle, to deliver a preemptive strike on us and China so that we couldn’t respond, we would have dealt a long time ago. And at the same time to climb on us with the Chinese - I honestly want this, I am purely interested to see.
    Let’s fantasize: Everyone says that the United States will deliver a disarming strike, and then set up an ultimatum to Russia - that’s not so. It is not strange, but in the threatened period, literally in a matter of hours or even minutes, Russia will be the first to strike at the missile defense system in Europe and Turkey by issuing an ultimatum. Further, in any case, a dumb scene happens, the world wakes up to digest what happened. Americans will be in an extremely difficult situation. On the one hand, an open attack on American military facilities is a 100% declaration of war, but on the other hand, the preventive destruction of missile defense facilities will deprive the United States of any hope of protection and pull the United States without the right to change something from their side to the threshold of a reciprocal nuclear strike, and this is how you already know a completely different matter;) Moreover, the complexity of the United States lies in the fact that they have an extremely meager choice:
    1-accept an ultimatum and put up with defeat and loss of image (whether it was a joke, they destroyed a military facility, but they can’t answer), or freak out (which is likely with a high degree of opportunity) and go to all the costs. But here, too, it doesn’t matter, either immediately beat each other to slaughter nuclear weapons, or arrange a public in the form of a small battle of fleets or a land invasion, though one fig will end in nuclear weapons and mutual destruction.
    And what about China, I think our US armies will not touch them at first, they will throw them a couple of nuclear missiles, well, Israel too, and then we’ll go on to teach Europeans tolerance. Of course, I’ll have to start additional trains along the Beijing-Paris route, but I think if you organize a roundabout (along the BAM, trains go only to the east, along the transibu only to the west), in a week only Chinese will be in Europe.
    1. +1
      1 August 2013 19: 54
      Quote: Bashkaus
      in the threatened period, literally in a matter of hours or even minutes, Russia will be the first to strike at the missile defense system in Europe and Turkey by issuing an ultimatum.

      Sergei! An extremely interesting and not an ordinary thought, a * la "Kursk Bulge-2". But there is something in this! +)))).
  37. +1
    1 August 2013 18: 19
    Quote: Vasya
    Are you children at all?
    When you fuck - you grow up and feel like living on the pasture in a hostile environment (called Americanism)
    Who and how protects Our "retaliatory strike"? You know?
    Want to give out military secrets: how to neutralize the Strategic Missile Forces?
    Read the chronicle of 1941. Everything is described there.
    Only the number of traitors will be greater.
    On the country and fellow citizens do not care. Save yourself. Egoism is the official ideology of the state and its citizens.
    Siberia lasts the longest. But there were no troops left.

    So far, only talk has not been blown away, but you already have a panic! negative
  38. Taktumma
    -4
    1 August 2013 18: 20
    In my opinion you commit an error. I can defend the position.
    1. Cpa
      +1
      2 August 2013 01: 44
      If you are not a "bot", go on, defend your opinion!
  39. +2
    1 August 2013 19: 30
    Let them not worry at the PENTOGON - WE SUCCESS !!!
    Today, China is the second economy in the world, and it is rapidly catching up with the weakening US economy.

    Yes ... China is becoming a priority first enemy for the United States ... because they encroach on the most valuable thing that aMers have - their economic power. Such actions are not forgiven. And no matter how aMera contacted and revolved around China, Beijing would not make concessions to the Americanos. And this means - there will be a serious conflict ... just God forbid "HOT!".
    ... the media made it clear to Russia and China that the United States plans to deliver a preemptive strike to both countries. In addition, in order to completely exclude the possibility of a retaliatory strike from Russia, the United States is trying to deploy missile defense systems near Russian borders, bypassing the agreements between the USA and the USSR

    Everything is verified by practice. But this is the case when it is better to never arrange such a check. The only one is 100% sure, as a former officer of the country's missile and space defense units, that a preemptive strike will not remain with impunity and those who start a nuclear war will receive an adequate response. Yes, after a preemptive strike, a very significant blow can be inflicted on our country. But we will be helped to withstand our long distances. For aMers, our retaliatory strike can inflict "unacceptable damage" ... the location of both the population and economic capacities is painfully concentrated.
    In my opinion, the goal of such an article in the Western media is to stir up excitement and knock out extra money for the military-industrial complex ... after all, the OBAMA administration plans to reduce the budgets of all ministries ... most of all through the Pentagon.
  40. ninemids
    -2
    1 August 2013 19: 57
    I consider what is it very interesting topic. Give with you we will communicate in PM.
  41. Skassy
    -2
    1 August 2013 20: 07
    I consider that you are not right. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM.
  42. 0
    1 August 2013 21: 55
    The collapse of the USSR and China’s focus on economic development gave Washington a nuclear advantage. According to experts, the author of the article notes, this advantage gives America the possibility of delivering a preemptive nuclear strike. They said that neither China nor Russia would be able to strike back.

    Hitler was also sure that the USSR would not be able to strike back, and died in the bunker, like a rat.
  43. +1
    1 August 2013 22: 22
    Normal article. One question - what will happen if China detonates its nuclear arsenal at a time?

    And if anyone does not know.
    Snowden has gone from the airport to Russia in an unknown direction, the social network "in contact" is already offering him a job.
    The Americans believe that Israel didn’t blow up some yachts, or at least not all.
    1. +1
      1 August 2013 22: 28
      Quote: poquello
      One question - what will happen if China detonates its nuclear arsenal at a time?

      But there WILL BE NOTHING, not people, not the Earth ...
      1. +1
        1 August 2013 23: 09
        Here they are following the owner of the earth.
        1. 0
          2 August 2013 10: 41
          Quote: tilovaykrisa
          Here they are following the owner of the earth.

          Among the people there are also bastards resistant to radiation and bacteriological weapons, this was established during accidents at nuclear power plants and during epidemics.
  44. Arrimaro
    -2
    1 August 2013 23: 07
    In it something is. Earlier I thought differently, many thanks for the information.
    1. Cpa
      0
      2 August 2013 01: 58
      Allways wellcome, read some more on our site, and maybe, world will change in yor eyes.Who may thinks, that somebody, english talking men, will read our posts and even agree with any points.I hope, this is new start! (Instead "peregruzka")
  45. mihasik
    0
    2 August 2013 01: 17
    The impression is that amers' brains are completely filled with fat and this fat presses on inadequate points on their brain. We must somehow "treat" them, otherwise these psychopaths will really start a nuclear war, but we will not be able to judge them, they are crazy ...)))
  46. The comment was deleted.
  47. 0
    2 August 2013 04: 35
    amers do not know what war! Hollywood brought up a bunch of morons for whom the realities of life look gloomy and you need to add colors! but you just have to gasp and there will only be a peep
  48. Aquady
    -4
    2 August 2013 05: 10
    You have quickly thought of such matchless phrase?
    1. +2
      2 August 2013 07: 41
      And you are not too lazy to register under five different nicknames
  49. essenger
    +2
    2 August 2013 05: 15
    What's wrong with ukrainians? They became americans?
  50. 0
    2 August 2013 08: 15
    Well, how much hysteria can you be hysterical about American plans? Yes, all their lives they do nothing but plan any dirty tricks against us, and as a result, "the point is not iron." All this is very similar to another "test for lice": how will they react Russians? Yes, we will react normally, and we are already responding adequately. And the stench was raised by them because of the fear that soon it will be possible to paste over water closets with their wrappers (if we take into account their real cost). Let’s say, maybe Russia and China will become more accommodating. Yes, they have frightened us more than once, and where are these "scarecrows" now. And the article, in principle, did not say anything new: we already know and understand a lot in US policy, over the past decades it has practically not changed.
  51. V. Ushakov
    0
    2 August 2013 08: 48
    They will have time, they will have time. And Russia will be in time, and China will be in time, and India will be in time, even Pakistan will be in time. They managed to harm everyone with their injections of shitcracy. They won’t count warheads... If they don’t believe it, let them try...
  52. 0
    2 August 2013 09: 05
    Well, of course, the Yankees can make any plans, no matter what the child amuses himself with, as long as he doesn’t stick his fingers in the socket, as they say. To inflict severe economic losses on America, it is enough to detonate a 200 megaton charge over it at two points at an altitude of 1,5 km .The entire infrastructure of the continent based on electricity and computer technology will burn out. And what’s funny is that for us the lack of light and internet is unpleasant but not fatal, for the Americans it’s a disaster. All nuclear powers have had a plan for such a dirty trick since the mid-80s. For the complete exterminus of the United States only 120-160 warheads of 125 kilotons are required. This is a full salvo of just two not very modern Dolphin class boats. It’s too early to talk about new boats, their capabilities are still vague. But according to preliminary data, one seems to be enough. Naturally, they remain operationally outside the brackets tactical boats with cruise missiles, of which there are also quite enough. I won’t talk about tactical nuclear weapons; even the military cannot say exactly how many of them there are and where they are hidden. Their entire preventive strike strategy is designed for silo weapons and for some reason, as of 90 years of combat readiness .

    To summarize: Although the article is sensible, it is entirely for their internal consumer.hi
  53. 0
    2 August 2013 09: 18
    The Yankees are stupid and arrogant. We lost all fear. They have watched enough of their films and think that they are the superior race that will save the world. It just won’t save you, it will destroy you. Perhaps they want to sit out in a bunker? That's where they go. Let them climb in and wait. Look, they will do hara-kiri to themselves out of boredom laughing
  54. +1
    2 August 2013 09: 33
    The real danger does not come from the Yankees, who are only cutting their budget and selling their equipment to the allies. They will not agree to a nuclear conflict. Without nuclear weapons, a war with Russia or China would mean huge losses in manpower and enormous costs, which would lead to the failure of the administration.
    They will crap, they will test our strength, as without this.

    The real danger comes from the bearded ones, who will not calm down until everyone goes to a better world, or the whole world turns it into a trash heap.
    The USSR also could not do anything in Afghanistan, it had to leave, and greatly harmed itself.

    An even more real danger from their officials and those who are at the same time with them is stealing our money, selling strategic enterprises to foreign investors, withdrawing money to offshore companies, corrupting the country, corrupting the youth. They are all on the hook of external intelligence services, and not only Western ones, the same Chinese and Georgian and Islamic ones. They are the biggest danger to the country.
  55. KononAV
    0
    2 August 2013 10: 14
    People don't live peacefully
  56. 0
    2 August 2013 10: 22
    Peace to your home, gentlemen!!! Much ado, about nothing!!! The Yankees have been dreaming of using nuclear weapons against us since the creation of this weapon!!! BUT from that very moment, it was used once! The only time, on globe!!! A lot of time has passed since then..... The Americans are weakening, and they feel it and understand it!! So they are showing off about some kind of blows.. In fact, there will be no blows!!!! China, and especially RUSSIA, will be able to respond! Yes, so it is not known who will be in the red from all this mess!!!

    Regards to you !!!!
  57. 0
    2 August 2013 10: 52
    Our History comes to mind. How many times have they tried to exterminate Us???
  58. 0
    2 August 2013 10: 55
    Over the past 68 years, most armed conflicts have been provoked in one way or another by Israel and the United States. However, they pretend to be victims. But it is Israel that has an illegal nuclear arsenal. It was Washington that developed the plan for a preventive nuclear strike. “The rest of the world rightly views the irresponsible governments of these two countries as an immediate threat to life on earth,” the author of the article concludes
    Let me remind you once again, the guys have forgotten history, for example - the Roman Empire, it also fell from the onslaught of its neighbors because it simply fed up everyone with its democracy! bully hi
  59. sonik-007
    +1
    2 August 2013 11: 09
    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
    What is needed for this? – Weapons that the enemy has no equal, and the political will of the ruling elite.
    It will be a high-precision hypersonic weapon. Nuclear weapons based on short-lived elements with mini-capacities, of the order of 0,1-1 ct. This is a laser weapon in space and on the battlefield. Electromagnetic guns and drones are battle drones. Etc.


    Wake up, it's the 21st century. Psychological, biological and geodetic weapons are in use.
    By the way, psychological weapons are ALREADY being used - in the form of an information war against Russia and China. Read against Putin, his government and the Russian Orthodox Church.
  60. 0
    2 August 2013 13: 46
    Quote: Max Otto
    It’s time for Putin to gather some UN Security Council or some other organization there and bring up the issue of transferring all US nuclear weapons under international control, the reason is the loss of adequacy by the US leadership and the lack of competent support staff.
    Take away dangerous toys from nutcases, and hit the butt, or better yet, the neck, only sick people!))
  61. 0
    2 August 2013 15: 45
    The other day I read Kolentyev’s book “The Third World War”. I recommend reading it. This is one of the most likely options in the event of war. Sincerely.
  62. sonik-007
    0
    2 August 2013 16: 02
    Quote: suharev-52
    The other day I read Kolentyev’s book “The Third World War”. I recommend reading it. This is one of the most likely options in the event of war. Sincerely.


    So what is the option?)
  63. High speed
    +1
    3 August 2013 15: 57
    Actually, we have two options for attacks:
    - traditional - counter-reciprocal, this is when they had enough, according to this fact, ours flew away in response until theirs arrived;
    - and I also like the newer option - preventive.
    That’s why they are leaning on the Kyrgyz Republic, starting a war with conventional weapons, crushing our strategic nuclear forces, and then do what you want.
  64. Michael ZM
    +1
    3 August 2013 17: 23
    The States will not risk attacking Russia themselves. Most likely they will want to pit a couple of countries against each other, dragging us into the conflict, as was the case in World War I. Sponsoring both sides to brew again. They are unable to boost the economy of their country in any other way.
    However, this time God is with us. This return to faith, incredible in scale and power, is not just an accident. We will stand. And the rest will have to be patient, judging by the prophecies.
  65. 0
    3 August 2013 18: 47
    By the time I read everything my brain began to boil wassat Once again the states are muddying the waters angry they won't succeed anyway tongue
  66. 0
    3 August 2013 21: 43
    It is necessary to create new, fundamentally different from existing, ultra-clean nuclear weapons. fired such a charge - and within a day you can walk around the source of nuclear damage without anti-radiation suits. Or behave the same way as they do - shoot the unwanted ones, bring the adequate ones to power in your own interests. I’m not a pessimist, however, God forbid, something short-circuits in the Amers’ brains or the next president turns out to be a fascist...
    1. 0
      5 August 2013 16: 04
      They are already fascists and Nazis at the same time. And their next president will either be appointed, or there will even be a dictatorship.
  67. Victor 4
    0
    26 August 2013 22: 26
    It is stupid and scary for them to dream about a nuclear war. But they are better at trade and information warfare. And plus there are many more permanent wars along the perimeter of our borders. It is necessary to activate cyber warfare means - this is the most vulnerable point in their armed forces. Destroying their toys at the right time... guaranteed. Send the Cossack programmers into the den and prepare hour X at the right time