Guaranteed self-destruction mechanism
20 years ago, the USA introduced a mechanism of guaranteed self-destruction into the state system of the Russian Federation. Today, this mechanism is running at full capacity.
Only now the US State Department officially recognized that in 1993, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, like a number of key laws of our country, was written by American advisers. Nobody could have imagined at that time what catastrophic consequences inevitably entail the inclusion of two fundamentally new provisions in the basic law of a state defeated in the Cold War: the 13 articles, 2 and 15 articles, 4. Only two articles of the American version of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: the refusal of the Russian state to protect its traditional values (ideology) and the recognition of the priority of international law over domestic law, today allowed outside to launch the mechanism of guaranteed self-destruction of our thousand-year state.
The winner always dictates his laws to the vanquished. The coup d'état of 1993 of the year in Moscow was no exception to this rule. Under the terms of the surrender, a classic raw materials colony was to appear on the spot of the second industrialized country of the world. Hitler, shedding a sea of blood, was so unable to achieve this strategic goal. It was an external enemy. But what the external enemy could not achieve, in only twenty years, achieved an internal one. Yeltsin and Co., with the support of the American "fifth column", were able to destroy not only the USSR, but also all the competitive domestic industry, in practice having de-industrialized Russia.
But has the thousand-year civilization code of Russia changed? Has the faith, morality, and cultural orientation of the majority of the people, the fundamental foundations of our entire existence, changed? No, not changed. Moreover, our people for the most part did not accept the “reforms” imposed from the outside, perceiving everything that is happening as the deliberate destruction of the country, outright plunder and illegal seizure of the national property by criminal elements and compradors.
But why did the Americans undertake to rewrite our laws, it turned out just now. It was not at all that their advisers were concerned about building a democratic free Russia. The United States pursued a more ambitious goal than the destruction of the material bases of the national economy and ousting its main industrial competitor from world markets.
Their main goal was to obtain a guarantee that Russia could never be reborn. To this end, the externally controlled mechanism of guaranteed self-destruction of Russia as a civilized multinational state, ensuring the destruction of the fundamental humanitarian foundations of our entire existence, was built in advance into the Russian state machine. This time bomb should have worked in the event of a weakening of the United States or the emergence of any serious problems for the Americans in order to eliminate any potential possibility of revenge on our part. And this moment seems to be coming. The second “Great Depression” is not far off, which inevitably entails a global redivision of the world.
The specificity of the world repartition and the 21 wars themselves lies in the art of waging war with others. Today, global transformation strategists simultaneously use two forms of forceful influence on resource-rich countries: external and internal. At the same time, the “internal” unrest is intended to destroy the fundamental foundations of society, creating a nutritive protest environment for the supply of “cannon fodder” to Islamist radical networks for the implementation of an “external” aggression.
External force today it is carried out in the traditional form of direct military aggression, but without the use of its own armies, with the exception of their intelligence, communications, transportation, logistics and management resources, including military instructors. In some cases, such as, for example, it was in Libya, using bomber and cruise missiles from the Air Force and Navy from a safe distance.
At the same time, the main focus of the external attack is on the use of cannon fodder from the ideologically motivated army of international Wahhabi terrorists (Salafis), formed from the totalitarian sects in Islam historically controlled by the Anglo-Saxons and their network combat structures.
Internal destructive effect based on the launch from the outside of the mechanism guaranteed self-destruction through the purposeful use of the force of state coercion and the institution of law. What is enough to reorient the national legal system and the state’s repressive mechanism ensuring it to the destruction of traditional spiritual-moral and national-cultural values, including the institution of the family. Instead of the primacy of collectivist principles, the principles of individualism must be built at the forefront. Old truth: it is difficult to break a bundle of brushwood, but breaking the twig behind the twig is easy to achieve.
The substitution of domestic law by falsely understood international law is, in fact, the process of replacing it with a special type of domestic colonial law imposed on the victor by the defeated party. The legalized priority of “international law” and the thoughtless borrowing from it of norms and customs that are alien to our people while the state refuses to defend its own traditional values (national culture and ideology) allows the power of the repressive apparatus of the state to be used to destroy the very foundations of society. After that, the final destruction of the basic traditional values, the institution of the family, motherhood and childhood will, in fact, be carried out by our own hands - by the hands of the duped and disunited compatriots.
Given the special role and capabilities of the national legal system in the destruction and preservation of the country, only proven and loyal people were to be in charge of it. Because of this, it is not surprising that the legal and judicial system of the state was left to Dmitry Medvedev and his people, as well as the memorable reform of the system of national education and science. In this regard, far from being random and not so innocuous today are the statements of Dmitry A. Medvedev, who, when he was president of the Russian Federation, said that story Russian state has only ... twenty years. The predictable failure of his affordable housing program. The list can be continued.
I do not think that this statesman is so naive that he sincerely believes in the transmigration of souls or the possibility of changing national identity, demonstrating the desire of his team to forcibly Europeanize Russian and other indigenous peoples of Russia with all his actions. In essence, to make us Germans or Anglo-Saxons so beloved by their hearts ...
This is the fundamental difference between Medvedev's position and that of Putin, who in 2007 almost included our arguments in his message to the Federal Assembly when he spoke about the essence of the national idea. Then we openly warned liberals in the Kremlin that for years already 90 both Marxists and liberals chopped bitches under themselves, trying to impose on our people alien spiritual, moral and cultural values, which bears unacceptably high risks of destruction of our state. But the right words from the high Kremlin tribune were not followed by any real actions.
But, after all, it was our country that, with all its tragic history after 1917, helped discover and formulate the law of the irreducibility of social norms, paying for it with a lot of blood. The law is formulated as follows: A social norm of a higher order cannot be replaced by a norm of a lower order. However, only the entire set of social regulators (1. Religious 2. Moral 3. Culture as the positive experience of ancestors and the institution of the family - language, folklore, education, science, the institution of the family, etc. 4. The right of 5. Politics) together with the economic regulator of the lowest, the sixth level, in their inseparable unity, they allow to harmonize and harmonize relations in society.
It is completely obvious that the purposefully destroyed ideals, the values of the intangible order and the national traditions proven by centuries will not replace anything new and cannot come. Breaking is not building. How can you never make a Russian German or an Englishman replace the Orthodox ethics with the Protestant, and replace the unknowable Russian soul, divine love and Christian morality with a bare rational calculation. After all, what is good for the Russian is death for the German. And no one has proven that the opposite is not true. With the British it is still more poorly and neglected.
Unlike these “advanced” bearers of island ideology, our “backward” men would never have guessed to do with their women what the “enlightened” Britons did to their trouble in practice when in the heat of fighting witches burned at the stake their beautiful women. But after all, as the classic said correctly, it is beauty that will save the world. Therefore, it is not surprising now that all subsequent generations of English men gave up on themselves and transferred relations with each other on a rational monetary basis, sincerely considering any local confused real lady, and an attractive-looking gay - her full-fledged and full-fledged, as it now turns out substitute. Having included their own bachelor's ideas and principles of behavior in the basic law of our country, the Anglo-Saxons, it seems, may soon try to require us to repeat their historical “feat” with regard to their better half, in order to force them to switch to same-sex marriages from hopelessness. Immediately make a reservation that this will not happen, because our beauties can enter the burning hut, stop the galloping horse, and sink any Briton into the hole. It is not them, the poor deprived, to teach us how to love women and have children.
Speaking seriously, the following is absolutely clear: if the state does not defend its values, including the institution of family, motherhood and childhood, others will do it (or will hypocritically declare what they will do). Moreover, when the state itself begins to destroy the basic values, then all those who disagree will begin to go over to the side of its enemies.
Our geopolitical opponents understand and use all this perfectly. Thus, the inevitable mass protest against the destruction of the very foundations of our existence, caused by the Anglo-Saxon “mine” laid down in the system of Russian domestic law, will create the necessary nutrient medium for filling the network of Wahhabi terrorist organizations spread by the same players with irreconcilable fighters.
External form of military aggression determines the need for constant replenishment of terrorist units with cannon fodder. War requires young fighters. Therefore, ideologists of totalitarian sects seek to attract young people to their ranks. Desirable obstinate, dark and uneducated young men and even adolescents, in work with whom it will be easy to reduce everything to primary human instincts and base passions.
Note that the principle of creating totalitarian extremist sects in different religious denominations is the same and is based on the pride of the fragile mind. The trap for young minds is the use by radicals of the same deceiving Protestant proposal to directly know the truth through the Quran or the Bible, eliminating the influence of all intermediaries (spiritual and moral authorities, the institution of a church or monasticism, icons, monuments of material culture and historical traditions, parents and loved ones ... ). Just as today, in different countries of the world, the Anglo-Saxons and the Israelis are trying to distort and destroy the meaning of basic social norms and regulators, focusing on the destruction of the institution of family, motherhood and childhood, morality and spirituality. After that, the young man easily becomes an object of ideologically motivated manipulation with a direct appeal to his basest instincts.
It is easy to seduce an impatient and intolerant young arrogant person by instilling in him the illusion of instantly resolving the most complicated contradictions with the help of ... the physical elimination of dissidents. No need to learn and work, especially to think. Kill the wrong, and all the problems accumulated in society will be resolved by themselves. Here, an alternative bet is placed on the instinct of domination - on the right of force for a person with a low educational qualification. The machine gun in his hands gives him the full right to dispose of the life and death of all infidels or their loved ones. And murder and violence, impunity quickly turns a person into a wild beast. The eternal human laziness, unwillingness to learn and work, a lot to master the profession of labor, contributes a lot to self-deception of neophytes.
A special role in attracting young people to Islamist radical networks is given to the free satisfaction of their sexual needs. The cynical use of the primary instinct of procreation in all its traditional and non-traditional forms and manifestations is carried out under the guise of "religious" fatwas (free sex, pedophilia, sodomy, violence against women and men ...). And here the well-known weakness of Islam plays into the hands of his and our enemies.
The rate of the Anglo-Saxons precisely on the radical currents of Islam is due to the varying degree of stability of traditional denominations - Orthodoxy, Catholicism and Islam - to the penetration of a particular kind of extremist heresy among believers.
It is known that totalitarian sects practically do not take root in Orthodoxy. History has convincingly shown that it is the most resistant to external influence religious faith. That is why they beat Orthodox Serbia, Greece, Cyprus, the cradle of Russian Orthodoxy in Syria ... Unlike Orthodoxy in Catholicism, it was possible to do this in previous centuries. In medieval Europe, Protestants and Catholics with weapons in their hands they took to the streets of cities and began mass-cutting each other. But today, even a sophisticated provocation with Breivik, in the draft of which an obvious Israeli trace can be traced, did not allow to model and launch the Christian version of jihad into a series.
And only in Islam - in the youngest world religion - totalitarian sects of Islamic radicals are now experiencing their rebirth. Perhaps this is the effect of the historical influence that British intelligence agencies have always had on the process of the formation and development of these radical movements. Let me remind you that back at the end of the 18 century, a close friend of the founder of Wahhabism, Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab, was a British spy, Mr. Humper, whose advice he always listened to. Many researchers point out that the Muslim Brotherhood organization, founded in 1928, with its institute of fidais (Islamic militants), as well as a number of its modern branches, was also always in the zone of strategic interests of Britain.
Today, the basis of both internal and external forms of power pressure on sovereign states is the same method. The enemy purposefully tries to discredit and destroy the three main social regulators of the traditional civilized state: religion, morality and culture (including language, folklore, literature, education, science, family institute, etc.). Replace the true values of artificial, frankly cannibalistic surrogates, putting the ideology of individualism, permissiveness, sexual freedom and licentiousness at the forefront.
Under the pretext of the primacy of universal values, the absolutization of individual rights and the priority of international law, both Western and Russian countries were hit by a shaft of destructive legislative initiatives: juvenile justice, legalization of same-sex marriages, marriages with inanimate objects, with oneself or animals, legalization of pedophilia, the Bologna process destruction of national education systems and its “ill-conceived” reforms, the destruction of science, the law on culture, etc., etc.
The International Youth Forum “Moral imperatives in law, education, science and culture”, organized by the professor, Dr. of Law, passed the 16-17 in May of 2013 in Belgorod. Elena Safronova and her colleagues, perhaps for the first time, visibly and vividly revealed the presence of a dangerous systemic defect of our state machine - the presence in it of a mechanism of guaranteed self-destruction of the fundamental foundations of society and the state twenty years ago consciously incorporated by Americans into our domestic legal system, as well as numerous signs of the beginning start this dangerous process. The conference participants carried out a detailed analysis of various aspects and facets of the problem, which at the system level revealed the following. Today, in virtually all strategically important humanitarian areas and spheres of our life, an internally coordinated process of their conscious deformation is being launched by methods of state coercion. What contribute to the new rules of the Russian legal system, borrowed from the system of international law.
Thus, in just one package of legislative initiatives, experts Lyudmila Ryabichenko immediately discovered 9 bills aimed at destroying the institution of family, motherhood and childhood (on the initiative of B.Altshuller, two laws: No.1 and No.2. No.1. Law No. 42197-6 of the Federal Law “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation on the Implementation of Social Patronage and the Activities of Trusteeship and Guardianship” for the forced control of families and the removal of children from any family. No.2. Law No. 3138-6 of the Federal Law "On Public Control for Ensuring the Rights of Orphans and Children Left Without Parental Care". On the initiative of E.Lahova (with 2003) and E.Mizulina (with 2008), Law No. 3. Law No. 284965-3 of the Federal Law "On State Guarantees of Equal Rights of Women and Men" ("On State Guarantees of Equal Rights and Freedoms of Men and Women and Equal Opportunities for Their Implementation"). Where the very concept of gender is blurred, like the concept of parenthood. No.4. Law No. 617570-5 FZ "On Culture in the Russian Federation"designed to destroy the moral component of culture and replace it with any abstract delights and distortions in the style of Marat Gelman, in order to replace culture with anti-culture. No.5. Law No. 38463-6 “On the accession of the Russian Federation to the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Performance and Cooperation Regarding Parental Responsibility and Measures to Protect Children” (The Hague Convention 1996 g.). No.7. Agreement between the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the CIS Interparliamentary Assembly on cooperation in promoting reproductive health and rights with its line of population reduction. No. 8. Model Reproductive Health and Rights Act - the scandalous sexual education of schoolchildren, abortion. No.9. Draft Law of the Federal Law "On the Ombudsman for Children's Rights"). The list can be continued.
1. The Russian legal system has revealed a hidden, deliberately organized systemic defect that has an unacceptably high level of risk of starting the process of guaranteed self-destruction, the destruction of the fundamental foundations of our society and the state. Self-destruction begins with a targeted attack on the institution of family, motherhood and childhood.
2. A direct connection has been established between the process of the destruction of our traditional spiritual and moral and national cultural values by methods of state coercion, with another negative process - the spread of terrorism and radical Wahhabi Islam in Russia.
To minimize the negative effects of these processes, it is necessary to make the appropriate changes to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, suspend the process of thoughtless borrowing of new norms of international law in the system of domestic law of the Russian Federation and conduct a thorough analysis of the risks of possible negative consequences of such borrowings; taking into account the problems identified above, create a system of interdisciplinary comprehensive examination of new legislative initiatives and law enforcement practice.
In conclusion, I repeat the obvious thought: if the state does not protect our traditional values, then its process will be headed by its implacable opponents.
Information